AgriDiverCluster: An Innovative Cluster for the Utilization of Greek Biodiversity and Plant Genetic Resources Georgia Koutouzidou 1, Athanasios Ragkos 2, Ioannis Ganopoulos 1, Eleni Maloupa 1 and Katerina Grigoriadou 1 1 Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources, Hellenic Agricultural Organization – DIMITRA, P.O. Box 60458, Thermi, Thessaloniki, 570 01, Greece 2 Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Hellenic Agricultural Organization – DIMITRA, Terma Alkmanos, Athens, 115 28, Greece Abstract The last fifteen years, policy-makers deal with the importance of developing policy frameworks for innovative collaboration systems. The Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources of Hellenic Agricultural Organization-DIMITRA took the initiative, as a facilitator, to create a vertical cluster for the sustainable exploitation of Greek flora and the production of natural products, consisting of fourteen companies and nine cooperatives (representing more than 10,000 farmers) and other research institutes and universities. The aim of this study is to indicate a rational way of creating a vertical cluster and the SWOT analysis in which could be based, focused on five important elements for the - management of genetic resources: a) protection of biodiversity and genetic resources, b) sustainable utilization of the biodiversity and genetic resources of the country, with emphasis on the species that can play a special functional role in human and animal nutrition, c) support and development of enterprises, active in various ways on value chains of agri-food sector, through the transfer of knowledge and training, -by carrying out joint research programs, product promotion actions and utilization of common infrastructure, d) collaboration with similar clusters in Greece and abroad and e) gradual transformation of the current conventional production process into a process of intensive knowledge, innovation and high technology. The final result is the extroversion of the sector’s enterprises, with the ultimate goal of developing new products of high value, with international competitive advantages and export potential in European and world markets. Keywords 1 SWOT analysis, industrial modernization, innovative products, Greek native flora 1. Introduction In the modern globalized and borderless food market, the competition has changed. This competition is expressed in terms of cost, quality, speed, flexibility and innovation of products and services provided, thus reinforcing the need to develop modern innovation collaboration systems. As the innovation activity increases, the need in increasing the marketing activity in order to ensure the market readiness to consuming new products grows as well [1]. Collaborative innovation systems are key to entrepreneurship and R&D activities, as they combine resources and knowledge to enable their members to cooperate on common strategies and activities towards their mutual benefit – especially of small and medium enterprises. To increase the innovation activity, but also to overcome obstacles, such Proceedings of HAICTA 2022, September 22–25, 2022, Athens, Greece EMAIL: koutouzidoug@gmail.com (A. 1); ragkos@elgo.gr (A. 2); giannis.ganopoulos@gmail.com (A. 3); maloupa@bbgk.gr (A. 4); grigokat@outlook.com (A. 5) ORCID: 0000-0002-6077-0504 (A. 1); 0000-0002-7247-6118 (A. 2); 0000-0001-7967-5702 (A. 3); 0000-0001-5754-3127 (A. 4); 0000- 0002-8000-9982 (A. 5) ©️ 2022 Copyright for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org) 440 as climate changes, reduction of pesticides and sustainable use of resources, clusters can facilitate the link between research and knowledge for members and associator’s. Clusters defined as groups of firms, related economic actors and institutions that are located near each other and have reached a sufficient scale to develop specialized expertise, services, resources, suppliers and skills [2,3] They bring together businesses and potentially other relevant entities in order to pursue common goals relating to better research opportunities, increased marketability of products, resolution of structural issues and any other objective which can be hard to achieve by one firm due to small size and limited resources. This short paper provides an outline of the process of establishing AgriDiverCluster in Greece, which is a collaborative innovation system, working as a cluster, bringing together companies and research institutes specializing in the sustainable exploitation Greek biodiversity and the production of natural products. 2. Creating Process of AgriDiverCluster The Greek plant biodiversity (national phytogenetic resources) is particularly rich (6,764 native species and subspecies) and of unique identity (22% of indigenous endemic plants, found nowhere else). These species are useful and valuable in various ways (aromatic-pharmaceutical-cosmetic-dye properties, agro-food interest, floricultural-ornamental value, felled species, etc.) [4]. According to the priorities of the European Union, which place research and innovation at the core of the future European strategy, the Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources (IPBGR) of Hellenic Agricultural Organization-DIMITRA took the initiative, as a facilitator, to create a vertical cluster for the sustainable exploitation of Greek flora and the production of natural products, consisting of fourteen companies and nine cooperatives (representing more than 10,000 farmers) and other research institutes and universities named AgriDiverCluster. The AgriDiverCluster aims to create new roadmaps directed towards the valorization of biodiversity and the development of natural products, as well as improving the interconnection between research and entrepreneurship at European level. AgriDiverCluster, as a vertical cluster, consists of all or part of the successive stages of production from upstream to downstream and is composed of technical relationships [5,6], consisting of enterprises, which are active in different links of the value chain of natural products, The common characteristic of all participating entities is their significant activity in sectors relating to the sustainable exploitation of Greek flora Partnerships through this cluster focus on creating joint actions, investment plans and on a sustainable relationship for participating in common priority areas of smart specialization linked to industrial modernization. In order to ensure the smooth process of creating a collaborative innovation cluster with the main mission and priority of the development prospects for the production of Greek products with a distinct identity and certification, training, communication and co-development processes between the members were initially followed and alongside a SWOT Analysis was realized. A bottom-up approach was proposed [7], picked by a common forum for communication and exchange of views between actors and included 1. identification of the willingness of entrepreneur to participate, e.g. by performing SWOT, 2. cost-benefit analyses, through a future business plan and 3. identification of priorities and directions. 3. Results and Discussion The research and development activities on which AgriDiverCluster focuses are in accordance to the Nagoya protocol [8]: 1. Protection of the national biodiversity and phytogenetic resources. 2. Sustainable utilization of the national biodiversity and phytogenetic resources, focusing on species that can play a distinctive functional role in human and animal nutrition (native aromatic / medicinal plants, traditional fruit varieties, small fruits, etc.) 3. Support and development of enterprises active on value chain of the agri-food sector, through knowledge transfer and targeted training, but also through the creation of networks for dissemination of information and interaction between cluster participants, by carrying out joint 441 research projects, undertaking common actions of product promotion and utilization of common infrastructure. 4. Collaboration with similar clusters in Greece and abroad. Collaborative innovation clusters are key players in entrepreneurship and research and development, providing a significant boost to competitiveness and innovation by playing a role in identifying, designing and implementing policies that often support job creation, development and investments. 5. Extroversion and gradual transformation of the current conventional production process into a process of intensive knowledge, innovation and high technology while promoting/enhancing the extroversion of the sector’s enterprises, with the ultimate goal of developing new products of high value, with international competitive advantages and export potential in European and world markets. The need to outline the problems and weaknesses faced by the business sector in relation to Greek biodiversity is demonstrated. On this basis, using simple established tools research, such as SWOT analysis, were presented briefly the main characteristics of AgriDiverCluster indicating a framework within can be examined which the impact of exogenous factors on the creation and improvement of the functioning of this specific innovation collaboration system [9]. A classic SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats Analysis) is usually considered as a good start for further Strategic Planning efforts and analysis. The carving of any strategy presupposes the understanding of the relations between the members of the AgriDiverCluster, but also of the relations with its external factors. At this point the shot analysis played a decisive role. The application of SWOT analysis assists the strategic planning process [10], describes the existing situation and examines the advantages and weaknesses concerning the cluster as well as the opportunities and threats that exist and reflect factors of its external environment. [11,12]. Therefore, the SWOT analysis (table 1) approach is intended to: • determine the comparative advantages/Strengths that distinguish AgriDiverCluster and highlight the strategies that must be taken to secure it. • identify any Weaknesses recorded in existing cluster and address their causes • investigate the Opportunities that are expected to arise for the members and • highlight the Threats that are expected to occur and to take appropriate measures for future consequences. 442 Table 1 Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats of AgriDiverCluster Strengths Weaknesses 1. Strong cooperation between the wider public 1. Lack of time of the involved people and sector, research organizations and enterprises members for the cluster 2. Special interest and resources from IPBGR for 2. Differences in member sizes – enterprises the establishment of the cluster 3. Decreased interest from some enterprises 3. IPGRB plays the role of facilitator and it is an 4. Lack of human resources by some initial important link for its members members for active participation in cluster 4. Intense and sustained interest from someone 5. Business culture of non-cooperation and members to establish the cluster consequently absence of experiences from 5. Participation of a relatively large number of respective collaborations businesses in the sector, originating from 6. Limited financial possibilities of very small different size and places in the value chain enterprises - members 6. Geographical dispersion of members 7. Acts as an intermediary agent for collaborations with other clusters in Greece and the EU 8. Importance of Greek biodiversity, as a link of potential members 9. Biodiversity and research on it 10. Growing trends in local cultivation varieties 11. Rise in the production of innovators natural products 12. Need for modernization and alignment with European and international practices of partnerships for benefit entrepreneurship Opportunities Threats 1. Cooperation between enterprises and 1. Gradual withdrawal of members due to institutes reduced interest, or opportunistic treatment 2. Possibilities and context of cooperation with 2. Inability to find common ground and vision, or others Greek, European or international clusters potential membership conflicts 3. Access to European funding programs 3. Failure to build relationships and trust issues 4. Increase funding for initiatives cluster in the between members new period 2021-2027 4. Failure to achieve partnership 5. Modern trends in nutrition 5. Little availability of opportunities funding in 6. Business networking with other value chains the initial phase (e.g. tourism) 6. Financial distress of members, particular in 7. The objectives of the new CAP and the very small enterprises European Green Agreement, which are aligned 7. Ensuring the equal participation of members with AgriDiverCluster 8. Possible changes in the political agenda 8. The EU Biodiversity Strategy 9. Incomplete National Policies for biodiversity 9. Possibility of institutional intervention in 10. Bureaucratic cluster establishment national and also European level procedures 10. Increasing research initiatives in European 11. Extension of the covid19 pandemic and world level 12. Uncertain economic environment 443 4. Conclusion Significant development prospects for the production of Greek natural products with identity and possibilities of authentication still remain unused, while at research level is achievable. This gap comes to be covered, in part, by the creation of the innovation collaboration system AgriDiverCluster. The cluster brings together, for the first time, enterprises and their representatives from Greece to exchange experiences and collaborate on issues related to biodiversity and plant genetic resources. The specific - study made to record the initial process for the creation of an innovation collaboration system, using as a first step the SWOT analysis. The SWOT analysis - provided the material for the members to drew and to better understand the level of cooperation and mutual assistance, both among themselves and with other carriers and clusters. 5. Acknowledgements This research has been co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call "Innovation Clusters/ 1st call: Facilitator (Acronym: AgriDiverCluster, project code: ΓΓ1CL-0057916). 6. References [1] Yuriy Petrovich Aniskin, Nina Konstantinovna Moiseeva, Dmitriy Borisovich Rygalin and Olga Valeryevna Sedova. Innovation and Marketing Activity of High Technology Companies in Business Management. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(3S), 25– 33(2015). doi: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/1685. [2] Michael Eugene Porter. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90 (1998). [3] Michael Eugene Porter. Clusters, innovation, and competitiveness: New findings and implications for policy. European Cluster Policy, Stockholm, Sweden (2008). [4] Panayotis D. Dimopoulos, Athanasios S. Kallimanis and Gail Schofield. National Biodiversity Strategy & Action Plan, 1st ed., Ministry of Environment, Energy & Climate Change, Athens, Greece, 2014. [5] Christian Ketels. European Clusters Structural Change in Europe 3 – Innovative City and Business Regions. Harvard Business School, Boston MA, USA., Hagbarth Publications (2004) [6] Jean-Luc Gaffard. Vertical networks or clusters: what tool for industrial policy? 2013. URL: https://www.ofce.sciences-po.fr/blog/vertical-networks-or-clusters-what-tool-for-industrial- policy/. [7] Athanasios Ragkos, Georgia Koutouzidou, Christos Christodoulou and Athanasios Batzios. Which orientation for strategies and policies for local animal breeds? The role of ICT and novel technologies, 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Agriculture, Food and Environment (HAICTA 2017). Chania (Crete), (21-24 September, 2017). [8] Official Journal of the European Union, REGULATION (EU) No 511/2014 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL (2014). [9] Anna Beloborodko, Francesco Romagnoli, Marika Rosa, Carmen Disanto, Riccardo Salimbeni, Eva Næss Karlsen, Marianne Reime, Tobias Schwab, Jonas Mortensen, Mikel Ibarra, Dagnija Blumberga. SWOT Analysis Approach for Advancement of Waste-to-energy Cluster in Latvia, Energy Procedia, Volume 72, June 2015, Pages 163-169, Part of special issue: International Scientific Conference “Environmental and Climate Technologies (2015). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.06.023 [10] Konstantinos Terzidis. Management - Strategic Approach. Modern Publishing, Athens, (2004). (In Greek) 444 [11] GSRT (General Secretariat of Research and Technology). Agri-Food Platform Description of ETAK Strategic Actions in Livestock Production for the years 2016-2017. Livestock Production Sector Coordinator: Georgios I. Arsenos, Professor A.U.TH. (2016). (In Greek) [12] Athanasios Ragkos, Georgia Koutouzidou, Stavriani Koutsou, and Dimitrios Roustemis. “A New Development Paradigm for Local Animal Breeds and the Role of Information and Communication Technologies”. International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Agriculture, Food & Environment (HAICTA): Innovative Approaches and Applications for Sustainable Rural Development, pp 3-21, Springer Earth System Sciences book series (SPRINGEREARTH) (2017). 445