<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Social Media as Communication Channels of Academic Libraries During the Covid-19 Pandemic</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Alina Petrushka</string-name>
          <email>alina.i.petrushka@lpnu.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ivanna Kozhushana</string-name>
          <email>Ivanna.Kozhushana.DK.2018@lpnu.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Elena Manach</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Bordeaux</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>France</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Bordeaux University Law, Political Science and Economics Library</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>4 avenue Denis Diderot, 33600 Pessac</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Lviv Polytechnic National University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>S. Bandery st. 12, Lviv, 79013</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Social media</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Facebook, Instagram, university library, Covid-19</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The communication interaction of Ukrainian academic libraries with the target audience regarding the formation and use of information space is an actual scientific problem. It gained particular importance in remote work conditions during the Covid-19 pandemic. The study aims to develop a methodology for analyzing the communication interaction of academic libraries and the target audience in social media. Achieving the set goal involves the implementation of tasks: to identify the dominant social platforms used by the analyzed university libraries; to determine the quantitative indicators of posting of the dominant social platforms used by the analyzed university libraries; to identify adaptive changes in the information presentation of university libraries to meet the situational information needs of the academic community in social media. The research methodology includes methods of analysis, visualization. Results. The dominant social media in the information presentation of Ukrainian university libraries are Facebook and Instagram. The proposed methodology makes it possible to carry out a diachronic analysis of the functioning of the dominant social media of Ukrainian academic libraries. Quantitative indicators of coverage, posting, feedback and topics were chosen as criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of identified social media libraries. The use of coverage coefficient (CC), number of posts per day (NPD) and feedback coefficient (FC) is proposed to stratify the social media of academic libraries by levels. The remote work format in quarantine conditions led to the formation of a multi-platform information presentation of Ukrainian university libraries on social networks. The analysis of the posts' subject dynamics shows adaptation to the new conditions of communication interaction with the library's target audience. Activation of the communication interaction of the target audience and university libraries should provide for the actualization of information presentation, taking into account the features of meeting users' basic and situational information needs.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>synthesis</kwd>
        <kwd>comparison</kwd>
        <kwd>content analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>grouping</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>In the conditions of digitization and rapid development of Internet technologies, Ukrainian
university libraries are undergoing significant transformations in their functional purpose. They are
gradually acquiring the status of academic information-analytical and information-communication
centers. Implementing bibliometrics and scientometrics in the arsenal of traditional library technologies
allows for high-quality cooperation between the library and the scientific and pedagogical staff.
Ukraine
(E. Manach)</p>
      <p>2022 Copyright for this paper by its authors.
University libraries of Ukraine actively implement various services for multifaceted information
support scientific activities.</p>
      <p>Communication interaction of Ukrainian academic libraries with the target audience regarding the
formation and use of information space is an actual scientific problem. It gained particular importance
in remote work conditions during the Covid-19 pandemic.</p>
      <p>The academic community actively uses social networks as an alternative tool for establishing
communication interaction. The development of an effective content strategy for posting on library
social media involves a complex approach, which consists of the implementation of several mandatory
stages:
 analysis of the state of communication interaction;
 planning;
 practical implementation;
 evaluation of results.</p>
      <p>An analysis of the state of communication interaction between university libraries and the target
audience on social media reveals their weaknesses and strengths. The incompleteness of studies on the
evaluation of the effectiveness of the information presentation of university libraries on social media
creates informational and competence barriers to developing and implementing a content strategy. The
study aims to develop a methodology for analyzing the communication interaction of academic libraries
and the target audience on social media. Achieving the set goal involves the implementation of tasks:
 to identify the dominant social media used by the analyzed university libraries;
 to determine the quantitative indicators of posting of the dominant social media used by the
analyzed university libraries;
 to identify adaptive changes in university library information presentation to meet the academic
community's situational information needs on social media.</p>
      <p>It will make it possible to open the prospect of identifying priority directions for the modernization
of academic social media, taking into account the positive experience of authoritative academic
communities and quantitative and qualitative indicators of feedback from the target audience.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Review of Literature</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>2.1. Use of social networks to promote library services during the Covid-19 pandemic</title>
      <p>
        The Сovid-19 pandemic has caused significant changes in the activities of university libraries. The
remote format of the work helped to improve the monitoring of digital services and intensify posting
on social networks. In particular, the growing number of registered profiles on the social media of USA
university libraries was used as alternative communication channels to inform users about changes in
services and promote other library information resources [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Researchers point to a shift in priority roles in implementing online learning in university libraries
due to Сovid-19. The authors define the combination of adaptive content of the website and social
networks as the optimal model for Nigerian university libraries in remote work conditions. Researchers
emphasize providing new skills to academic librarians to implement the library model [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Brazilian researchers point to the need for new skills and knowledge of librarians as one of the
challenges of establishing university libraries in the Covid-19 pandemic. At the same time, researchers
have identified social networks as the dominant information and communication technologies for
providing reference services and disseminating information [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Spanish academic libraries have also actively reoriented their activities and services during the
Covid-19 crisis. Analysis of 11,867 tweets and retweets from 56 libraries based on particular thematic
categorization confirmed the primary role of these institutions as important information and
communication centers in conditions of isolation and lack of reliable information [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        A comparison of Polish library approaches to using social media for adjusting communication and
collaboration with customers during the Covid-19 pandemic shows that Facebook, Instagram, and
Twitter are the most frequently used social media platforms. Much less often, university libraries use
YouTube in their information presentation. At the same time, the author points out the heterogeneity of
social media involvement in Polish university libraries, despite the communication benefits of these
resources [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        During the pandemic, an investigation of the online learning environment’s structure of Arab public
universities discovered commonly used online learning social media platforms: Youtube, Whatsapp,
presentation tube, Google classrooms, Zoom, Blackboard, and Facebook [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Thus, Covid-19 accelerated the implementation of social media and other information and
communication technologies in the everyday work of university libraries. The most popular social
media platforms are Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and WhatsApp.
2.2.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Research on the quality of library websites</title>
      <p>
        Study of the quality of the websites of top QS medical university libraries showes the absence of
libraries that meet all the criteria. Almost half of the analyzed libraries do not use modular applications.
Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn are the most popular information dissemination
tools [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. Research on the quality of university library information resources indicates that Malaysia’s
public university institutional repositories that use hyperlinks and promote university publications
through academic community pages on social networks are more visible [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Analysis of the popularization and promotion means of the Spanish scholars in the field of library
and information (LIS) discovered the use of digital platforms such as personal blogs, personal websites,
ORCID, Twitter, Linkedin, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Mendeley, and the Exit
Directory. The study results show that ResearchGate and Google Scholar are the most popular platforms
for managing scientific reputation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        A study of Web 2.0 tools implementation by Indian university libraries indicates that social networks
Twitter, Facebook, and Youtube are the most popular Web 2.0 tools for rapidly disseminating news and
announcements about new library resources and services. Pinterest, Flickr, RSS, and Blogs are less in
demand among Indian university libraries. The authors point to the lack of policies and planning, lack
of funding, and staff qualification level as the main problem areas in the implementation of Web 2.0
services by university libraries [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Exploration of recent trends of using Web 2.0 applications by academic libraries in Asia through
their library websites shows similar results. The most widely used Web 2.0 applications are Facebook,
RSS, Twitter, and YouTube [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        At the same time, researchers emphasize the need to optimize social networking services to
communicate between university libraries and users. Understanding users' information needs and
setting goals, indicators, and strategies for each social network is the key to developing the social
networking services of libraries [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Consequently, research showed no strategy or method for conscious management of digital
platforms and academic reputation and the need to implement updates and restructuring. University
libraries' most popular Web 2.0 tools are Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and Linkedin.
2.3.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Updating the library for modern standards</title>
      <p>
        The definite trend of the current state of scientific communication is the implementation of open
access to scientific information. Research results on the performance by the University of Manchester
Library of an innovative project to expand the target audience of consumers of scientific content through
the non-academic community show that developed open access services systematically allow simplified
short research expressions in English via Twitter [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        An increasing number of resources in university libraries and diversifying users' information needs
make it challenging to find the necessary resources. Researchers propose a hybrid book
recommendation algorithm based on contextual awareness and social networking to solve this problem.
The proposed algorithm demonstrates the advantages over the traditional co-filtering algorithm in
accuracy and response speed [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Thus, with the help of new ideas and their realization, scholars enable libraries to improve their
internet skills and attract new audiences.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Perception of libraries’ social networks by students and researchers</title>
      <p>
        Despite the popularity and convenience of using social networks in everyday communication, the
adoption and use of social media for scientific communication remain ambiguous. In particular, a study
on the acceptance of Belgian students' use of social media, namely Facebook and Twitter, in an
academic library based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)
demonstrates that university libraries' introduction of social media is positively influenced by the
expected duration of efforts, expected productivity, and social impact. At the same time, the problem
areas are poor access to the Internet and students' rejection of Facebook and Twitter for scientific
communication [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The content analysis of information resources of The Hong Kong University Library revealed that
both Facebook and Instagram received low user engagement. Dissatisfaction with library social media
is uninteresting content about library news and events. At the same time, respondents recommend
diversifying the posting topic and more actively using the style and features of social media to attract
the audience [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The study of the effectiveness of the Facebook page of The Hong Kong University Library was
conducted based on comparisons of the involvement of students and faculty members. The obtained
results concluded that the level of audience involvement in the social media of the university library
depends on the number of library services used by this audience [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The study results confirm such conclusions regarding Assam Central University's social media
library's effectiveness in meeting scholars' information needs. The study's authors point out that topical
information about library services is the primary motivating factor for using a library's social media by
researchers [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Consequently, most of the respondents congratulate the use of social media. However, they illustrate
poor activity through site style, content, and internet access.
2.5.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Twitter as a Library Marketing Strategy</title>
      <p>
        Analysis of the use of Twitter as a digital marketing strategy for the library system of the Federal
University of Sergipe concludes that increasing the effectiveness of digital marketing strategies in social
networks by university libraries requires the creation of particular policies. It will ensure the appropriate
level of interaction of the library with users, dissemination, and exchange of information [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Researchers also compare the content of academic and public library profiles on Twitter to assess
posting and audience engagement. The results show that the posting of public and academic libraries
differs by topic, and the level of engagement is a factor in the number of tweets in any case [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Thus, the results showed insufficient awareness of promotion on Twitter. The topics of posting and
the number of tweets are crucial for establishing informational interaction with the audience via Twitter.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>2.6. Components of successful promotion of library services on social networks</title>
      <p>
        Research on the individual abilities of librarians as an integral component of the effective use of
social networks in libraries of Iranian State University founds that the skills of establishing
communication through social networks, familiarity with the social network, and cognitive skills to
meet users' needs in information have the most significant impact on the quality of marketing activity
in academic libraries [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        A survey of librarians showed that most librarians mainly use social media platforms to provide
library services. With the help of social media platforms, librarians raise their awareness of library
resources and services and disseminate library news and events. Based on the results, researchers
recommend that library management provide opportunities for librarians to train and retrain in social
media skills and new technologies as a tool to increase their effectiveness [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Researchers offer a detailed quantitative and qualitative data analysis on posting libraries at the Josip
Juraj Strossmayer University in Osijek on Facebook. Researchers point out that the popularity of
Facebook pages largely depends on the type and content of posts, the number of photos, videos, and
events. The library's Facebook page of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences has the best
feedback. Libraries can use the results of this study as a guide for implementing strategic planning and
monitoring the audience's information needs [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Consequently, having analyzed the activities of libraries on Internet platforms, researchers showed
such regularities of success: individual abilities of librarians, assistance to readers in awareness of
library resources and services, as well as the spread of library news and events, feedback as preferences.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>3. Methodology</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>3.1. Sampling for analysis</title>
      <p>
        The sample of libraries was formed by stratometric selection from the general number of all
university libraries in Ukraine. The Consolidated Ranking of Higher Education Institutions 2020 was
taken as a basis [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>
        ]. The analyzed sample consists of libraries of Ukrainian universities that are in the
top 10 of this ranking. That is, the sample size is 10 libraries that are units of the Taras Shevchenko
National University of Kyiv, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, National Technical
University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Ivan Franko National University of
Lviv, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University,
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University, Bogomolets
National Medical University and Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of
Ukraine.
3.2.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>Analysis of information representation of Ukrainian university libraries</title>
      <p>Analysis of the information representation of university libraries on the Internet involves the
following stages:
 identification of names of social media platforms in the system of information representation
of university libraries and determination of dominant platforms;
 correction of the sample of university libraries;
 content analysis of specific dominant social media platforms of the corrected sample of
university libraries.</p>
      <p>Identification of names of social media platforms in the system of information presentation of
university libraries is to find active pages of libraries on social media and record their names. We define
social media platforms as dominant information resources if they are used by at least 80% of selected
university libraries.</p>
      <p>Correction of the sample of university libraries is to ensure the completeness of content analysis and
comparability of data. Criteria for selecting university libraries to correct the sample determine:
 the simultaneous use of defined dominant social media;
 the active use of certain dominant social media during the statistical period from January 1,
2019, to December 31, 2020.
3.3.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-12">
      <title>Content analysis of dominant social media</title>
      <p>Content analysis of the dominant social media platforms of Ukrainian university libraries involves
determining the quantitative indicators of coverage, posting, and content topics for 2019-2020.</p>
      <p>Quantitative coverage indicators are calculated for a corrected sample of university libraries that
simultaneously use certain dominant social media. Quantitative indicators of coverage include:
 number of subscribers to the university library account on social media;
 coefficient of coverage (CC) of the university library account in social media. CC is the ratio
of the total number of subscribers to this account to the average number of subscribers of all accounts
in the dominant social media of the corrected sample of university libraries.</p>
      <p>Quantitative posting indicators are calculated for a corrected sample of university libraries that
actively use defined dominant social media during the statistical period 2019-2020. Quantitative posting
indicators include:
 the total number of posts of the university library on social media for 2019-2020;
 the average number of posts per day (NPD) is the ratio of the total number of posts of the
university library on social media for 2019-2020 to the number of calendar days for this period (731
days);
 the total number of likes of university library posts on social media for the selected period;
 the average number of likes per post is calculated as the ratio of the total number of likes for
the selected period to the number of posts for this period;
 feedback coefficient (FC) is the ratio of the average number of likes per post to the total number
of subscribers of library account on social media and multiplied by 100 percent. Therefore, FC is
the percentage of followers actively interacting with library social media posts.</p>
      <p>Coverage coefficient (CC), the number of posts per day (NPD) and feedback coefficient (FC) are
tools to stratify the social media of academic libraries by coverage, posting and feedback levels.</p>
      <p>The topics of the content of the dominant social media of academic libraries were studied by
identifying the subject of the posts, grouping and generalizing according to the proximity of the
subjects, and formulating topics of posts. We determine the adaptability of social media in academic
communities by the dynamics of the topics of posts during 2019-2020.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-13">
      <title>4. Results</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-14">
      <title>4.1. Analysis of information representation of university libraries in social media platforms</title>
      <p>Analysis of the information presentation of 10 libraries of top universities in Ukraine showed that
100% of libraries have official autonomous websites and actively use various social media platforms.
Seven names of social media platforms where university libraries present their content were identified
(Tab.1).</p>
      <p>Dominant social media platforms used by Ukrainian university libraries as their information
presentation are Facebook and Instagram. 90% and 80% of selected libraries, respectively, prefer these
social networks. Using YouTube video hosting libraries, where 70% of the analyzed libraries have their
channels, is unexpected. In parallel, the components of information representation of Ukrainian
university libraries are Telegram (40%), Twitter (20%), LinkedIn (10%), and TikTok (10%).
M. Maksymovych Scientific Library Taras</p>
      <p>Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy</p>
      <p>Library
The Scientific and Technical Library named
after G.I. Denysenko of National Technical
University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv</p>
      <p>Polytechnic Institute”
Scientific Library of Ivan Franko National</p>
      <p>University of Lviv
+
+
+
+
5
6
7
8
9
10
Central Scientific Library of V. N. Karazin</p>
      <p>Kharkiv National University
Library of Danylo Halytsky Lviv National</p>
      <p>Medical University
Scientific Library of Lviv Polytechnic National</p>
      <p>University
Scientific Library of Odessa I.I.Mechnikov</p>
      <p>National University
Library of Bogomolets National Medical</p>
      <p>University
Scientific Library of Dnipropetrovsk Medical
Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine
+
+
+
+
+
+
+</p>
      <p>Thus, selecting university libraries to correct the sample is the simultaneous use of Facebook and
Instagram as the dominant social media platforms. According to the chosen research methodology, we
are forming a sample of 7 university libraries.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-15">
      <title>4.2. Content analysis of university library pages on Facebook and Instagram</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-16">
      <title>4.2.1. Quantitative indicators of posting</title>
      <p>The level of activity of use and demand for library pages on Facebook and Instagram is determining
by quantitative indicators of posting: coverage, posting and feedback. Coverage is the number of
subscribers of libraries' pages on Facebook and Instagram as of February 17, 2022 (Fig. 1).</p>
      <p>There is a significant spread in the number of active subscribers both on Facebook and Instagram of
one library and in general among social media of all analyzed libraries. We determine coverage levels
by setting the coverage coefficient CC as a comparison tool. The coverage of social platforms divides
into three levels according to the CC coefficients (Tab. 2).</p>
      <p>Quantitative indicators of the coverage of university library pages on Facebook (number of
subscribers and coverage coefficient) allowed us to highlight the social media of Ukrainian university
libraries of high and low levels of coverage (Tab. 3).
СС
3,04</p>
      <p>The Scientific and Technical Library named after G.I.</p>
      <p>Denysenko of National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor</p>
      <p>Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”
National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Library
M. Maksymovych Scientific Library Taras Shevchenko</p>
      <p>National University of Kyiv
Library of Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University
Central Scientific Library of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National</p>
      <p>University
Scientific Library of Lviv Polytechnic National University</p>
      <p>Scientific Library of Odessa I.I.Mechnikov National</p>
      <p>University
Library of Bogomolets National Medical University
5948
5633
2060
1645
1644
1198
875
2,59
2,46
0,90
0,72
0,72
0,53
0,38
Low</p>
      <p>In contrast to Facebook, the pages of Ukrainian university libraries on Instagram show other levels
of coverage. According to the total number of active subscribers and the coverage coefficient, we
highlight the pages of university libraries on Instagram with medium and low coverage (Tab. 4).
Central Scientific Library of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National</p>
      <p>University
Library of Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University</p>
      <p>The Scientific and Technical Library named after G.I.</p>
      <p>Denysenko of National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor</p>
      <p>Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”
СС
1,68
0,84
0,33
Coverage
level
Low
Scientific Library of Lviv Polytechnic National University</p>
      <p>National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Library</p>
      <p>Library of Bogomolets National Medical University
M. Maksymovych Scientific Library Taras Shevchenko</p>
      <p>National University of Kyiv</p>
      <p>The sample of university libraries has to be corrected due to the criteria of using Facebook and
Instagram during the selected statistical period from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020, to ensure
the completeness of the analysis of posting and comparability of data. To this end, we identify the
registration dates of library accounts on these social media (Tab. 5).</p>
      <p>Thus, the finalized sample of university libraries includes four institutions: M. Maksymovych
Scientific Library Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla
Academy Library, The Scientific and Technical Library named after G.I. Denysenko of the National
Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, and Library of Danylo
Halytsky Lviv National Medical University. We define the posting of university libraries on Facebook
and Instagram as the total number of posts for 2019-2020 (Fig. 2).</p>
      <p>Comparing the features of posting on Facebook and Instagram, we find patterns inherent in all
analyzed libraries. In particular, there is a dominance in using Facebook by university libraries. The
total number of posts of the analyzed university libraries on Facebook exceeds the total number of posts
on Instagram by 7-11 times for the same period. As a comparison tool, we determine the posting levels
by the average number of posts per day.</p>
      <p>The posting of university libraries on social media platforms is divided into three levels according
to a certain average number of posts per day (Tab. 6).</p>
      <p>The general indicators of posting of university libraries on Facebook (total number of posts and
average number of posts per day) allowed identifying social media platforms of university libraries of
medium and low levels of posting (Tab. 7).</p>
      <p>Unlike Facebook, the pages of university libraries on Instagram show only a low level of posting by
the total number of posts and the average number of posts per day (Tab. 8).</p>
      <p>Library title</p>
      <p>The Scientific and Technical Library named after G.I.</p>
      <p>Denysenko of National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor</p>
      <p>Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”
M. Maksymovych Scientific Library Taras Shevchenko</p>
      <p>National University of Kyiv</p>
      <p>National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Library
Library of Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University</p>
      <p>Library title</p>
      <p>The Scientific and Technical Library named after G.I.</p>
      <p>Denysenko of National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor</p>
      <p>Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”
M. Maksymovych Scientific Library Taras Shevchenko</p>
      <p>National University of Kyiv</p>
      <p>National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Library</p>
      <p>Library of Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University
Posting</p>
      <p>level
Facebook</p>
      <p>Trends in the implementation of information interaction between university libraries and the
academic community during the Covid-19 pandemic are determined based on the analysis of posting
dynamics for 2019-2020. Posting dynamics will provide a picture of the adaptation of university
libraries to the new conditions of operation and communication with users.</p>
      <p>The posting dynamics of the analyzed university libraries on Facebook is ambiguous. Posting for
2020 compared to 2019 of The Scientific and Technical Library named after G.I. Denysenko of the
National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” and the Library
of Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University decreased by 4% and 18% respectively. At the
same time, the posting of M. Maksymovych Scientific Library Taras Shevchenko National University
of Kyiv and National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Library increased by 3% for the same
periods (Fig. 3).</p>
      <p>The posting dynamics of the analyzed university libraries on Instagram are also different. The
increase in posting in 2020 compared to 2019 is observed only for the Library of Danylo Halytsky Lviv
National Medical University and is 63%. At the same time, posting of The Scientific and Technical
Library named after G.I. Denysenko of the National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky
Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, M. Maksymovych Scientific Library Taras Shevchenko National
University of Kyiv, and National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Library decreased by 24%, 9%
and 71% respectively (Fig. 4 ).</p>
      <p>Thus, the results of the posting analysis showed that university libraries used Facebook much more
intensively than Instagram both before and after the pandemic, despite the general dynamics of posting.</p>
      <p>The dynamics of posting levels on Facebook during 2019-2020 indicate the absence of posting shifts
in the analyzed libraries through the levels (Tab. 9).</p>
      <p>There were also no shifts in the posting levels on Instagram of university libraries after the beginning
of the Covid-19 pandemic (Tab. 10).
The Scientific and Technical Library named after
G.I. Denysenko of National Technical University of
Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”</p>
      <p>M. Maksymovych Scientific Library Taras</p>
      <p>Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy</p>
      <p>Library
Library of Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical</p>
      <p>University</p>
      <p>Library title
The Scientific and Technical Library named after
G.I. Denysenko of National Technical University of
Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”</p>
      <p>M. Maksymovych Scientific Library Taras</p>
      <p>Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy</p>
      <p>Library
Library of Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical</p>
      <p>University</p>
      <p>Feedback on Facebook and Instagram is defined as the number of likes of posts published during
2019-2020 (Fig. 5).</p>
      <p>Due to the significant spread in the total number of likes and the different levels of posting of
university libraries on Facebook and Instagram, it is advisable to compare feedback by the number of
likes per post. Comparing the feedback, we observe an interesting phenomenon. Despite the significant
advantage of Facebook by posting, the pages of all analyzed university libraries on Instagram dominate
in the number of likes per post.</p>
      <p>The feedback may indicate a more active target audience, visibility, and relevance of the content of
library Instagram pages to the information needs of users (Fig. 6).</p>
      <p>The dynamics of likes on Facebook indicate a decrease in the target audience's interest in the content
of the analyzed university libraries during the Covid-19 pandemic by 16-33%. At the same time, the
page of M. Maksymovych Scientific Library of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv on
Facebook shows an increase in interest of the target audience by 23%, with an increase in posting by
only 3% (Fig. 7).</p>
      <p>There is a similar situation with the dynamics of likes of university libraries on Instagram. The
decrease in the target audience's interest in the content of the analyzed university libraries on Instagram
during the Covid-19 pandemic is 16-28%. At the same time, the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla
Academy Library's Instagram page shows a 49% increase in the target audience's interest, despite a
71% decrease in posting (Fig. 8).</p>
      <p>An increase in the number of likes may indicate a rapid adaptation of the library to the new
conditions of communication with users and the presentation of content that meets the basic and
situational information needs of the target audience.</p>
      <p>Differences in the dynamics of the number of likes on Facebook and Instagram may indicate the
lack of a comprehensive policy of parallel development of all information resources of Ukrainian
university libraries, which are finding and establishing optimal channels of communication with the
target audience.</p>
      <p>The feedback of university libraries on social media platforms is divided into three levels according
to corresponding to the effect of the feedback coefficient (FC). Stratification of feedback on the level
involves the following approaches:
 100% of library social media account followers can potentially like posts;
 the average number of likes per post reflects the average number of active subscribers
interacting with library social media;
 the percentage of subscribers actively interacting with library social media is the ratio of the
number of likes per post to the total number of followers. The resulting percentage of active
subscribers is the feedback coefficient.</p>
      <p>We define three levels of feedback as thirds of 100%, which is the maximum value of the feedback
coefficient (Tab. 11).</p>
      <p>The dynamics of feedback levels on Facebook during 2019-2020 indicate the absence of feedback
shifts in the analyzed libraries through the levels. All analyzed library Facebook pages are characterized
by low levels of feedback. Only M. Maksymovych Scientific Library Taras Shevchenko National
University of Kyiv shows a positive trend in the growth of the feedback coefficient (Tab. 12).</p>
      <p>Feedback
level
Low</p>
      <p>Library title
National University of
Kyiv-Mohyla Academy</p>
      <p>Library</p>
      <p>The Scientific and
Technical Library named
after G.I. Denysenko of</p>
      <p>National Technical
University of Ukraine</p>
      <p>“Igor Sikorsky Kyiv
Polytechnic Institute”</p>
      <p>M. Maksymovych
Scientific Library Taras
Shevchenko National</p>
      <p>University of Kyiv
Library of Danylo Halytsky</p>
      <p>Lviv National Medical</p>
      <p>University</p>
      <p>Number of
subscribers
5948
6973
5633
2060
The distribution of feedback by level on Instagram of university libraries differs significantly. We
observe university library Instagram pages in all three levels of feedback. Also, after the beginning of
the Covid-19 pandemic, there has been a shift between the levels of feedback. Interesting results
regarding the feedback coefficient were obtained by M. Maksymovych Scientific Library Taras
Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. The FC=103.5% indicates interaction with all subscribers
and not-subscribers of the library's Instagram (Tab. 13).</p>
      <p>Thus, with a much smaller number of followers, Instagram of university libraries is characterized
by a higher level of feedback than Facebook. It characterizes Instagram's target audience as more active
interacting with library posts.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-17">
      <title>4.2.2. Analysis of posting changes during the Covid-19 pandemic</title>
      <p>Content analysis of 2333 posts of the selected sample of Ukrainian university libraries on Facebook
and Instagram for 2019-2020 allowed us to identify 12 specific posting topics. An analysis of library
social media content changes after the start of the Covid-19 pandemic is presented in Table 14 and
Table 15.</p>
      <p>Dominant topics in the posting of Ukrainian university libraries during 2019-2020 are the library
and its activities, book collections and new arrivals, calendar of significant dates and greetings, famous
personalities, event announcements and descriptions, information for researchers, information for
students and communication with users. The presentation of topics on general-purpose information and
academic integrity becomes selective. It is important to note that since the beginning of the Covid-19
35
63
23,7</p>
      <p>medium
high
103,5
high
52
53
35,4
87,3
pandemic, all analyzed university libraries have supplemented the topic of posting on Facebook with
relevant information materials about Covid-19 or advice on rational organization of study, work, leisure
in quarantine (Tab. 14).</p>
      <p>At the same time, the posting topics on Instagram do not have an utterly dominant core. Posting
topics of the analyzed university libraries are presented in different combinations. A significant part of
the posting is devoted to the library's activities, the coverage of book collections and new arrivals, the
calendar of significant dates, and information for students. There is little or no information for scientists.
This shows the orientation of university libraries on Instagram to the youth audience. Posting topics on
Covid-19 and advice on the rational organization of study, work, and leisure during quarantine are
presented by three of the four analyzed Ukrainian libraries. It evidences the adaptability of university
libraries posting on Instagram (Tab. 15).</p>
      <p>LDHLMU</p>
      <p>NUKMAL</p>
      <p>MSLTSNU</p>
      <p>STLDKPI
2019</p>
      <p>Thus, Ukrainian university libraries within both social platforms tried to adapt their information
presentation by publishing posts on the features of distance work and learning, leisure in self-isolation,
announcing a large number of online events, and current information about Covid-19. We should note
that the peak of posting on the topic of Covid-19 fell on March-May 2020 and then fell to almost zero.
There was a slight increase in posting about Covid-19 in October 2020 due to the second wave of the
pandemic (Fig. 9).</p>
      <p>The adaptation of the information presentation took place by changing the content of the posts and
registering new library pages on various social media platforms or activating the content of
preregistered but empty Instagram pages. Libraries that have both Facebook and Instagram pages do not
duplicate content. In general, the topics of the posts are combined and supplemented on different
platforms.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-18">
      <title>5. Conclusions</title>
      <p>The dominant social media in the information presentation of Ukrainian university libraries are
Facebook and Instagram. The proposed methodology makes it possible to carry out a diachronic
analysis of the state of communication interaction between Ukrainian academic libraries and the target
audience in the dominant social media. Quantitative indicators of coverage, posting, and topics were
chosen as criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of identified social media libraries. The use of
coverage coefficient (CC) and number of posts per day (NPD) is proposed to stratify social media of
academic libraries by levels. It has been determined that Facebook significantly outperforms Instagram
in terms of coverage of followers and terms of posting. Facebook has been an integral component of
the information space of most Ukrainian university libraries for a long time. At the same time, both
stylistically and chronologically, Instagram is just beginning to enter the library's information toolkit
fully. However, Instagram shows a significant advantage over Facebook in feedback, which indicates
its potential as a promising and used information resource for academic communities.</p>
      <p>The adaptability of the functioning of libraries and their information presentation on social media
serve as a measure of the quality of meeting the information needs of the target audience. The remote
format of work in the conditions of the Covid-19 pandemic contributed to the diversification of posting
topics and the multi-platform nature of the information environment of Ukrainian university libraries
due to the activation or creation of new library pages on various social media.</p>
      <p>Information presentation of university libraries in social media in the conditions of the Covid-19
pandemic has undergone certain transformations. It is evident that before the pandemic, social media
served as a tool for informing users and promoting Ukrainian university libraries' activities. In the
conditions of the pandemic, there was a need to ensure quality communication and fill the information
vacuum caused by the isolation of the academic community. 50% of analyzed libraries on Facebook
and 25% on Instagram followed the path of increasing posting. However, the increase in the number of
likes during the pandemic was observed regardless of the level of posting, which was obviously caused
by the relevance and demand for library content on social media.</p>
      <p>The creation of high-quality content in social media today is a separate competence segment of the
professional profile of librarians. The maximum involvement and expansion of the target audience in
the information environment of the library require creating original content following the basic and
situational information needs of users.</p>
      <p>The proposed methodology of analysis of libraries' social media provides an opportunity to open the
perspective of determining the priority areas of modernization of the academic virtual information
environment.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-19">
      <title>6. References</title>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1] E. de los Á.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ortega-Martínez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pacheco-Mendoza</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H. E. García</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Meléndez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ortiz-Díaz</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Saavedra-Alamillas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Digital services adapted by libraries in Mexico to COVID-19 pandemic: a critical review</article-title>
          ,
          <source>DLP</source>
          <volume>37</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>3</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>17</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1108/DLP-07-2020-0063.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Ifijeh</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Yusuf</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Covid
          <article-title>- 19 pandemic and the future of Nigeria's university system: The quest for libraries' relevance</article-title>
          ,
          <source>The Journal of Academic Librarianship</source>
          <volume>46</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.acalib.
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <volume>102226</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>F. de S. C. Tanus</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Sánchez-Tarragó</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Activities and challenges of Brazilian university libraries during the Covid-19 pandemic</article-title>
          , Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la
          <source>Salud</source>
          <volume>31</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). URL: http://rcics.sld.cu/index.php/acimed/article/view/1615.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Martínez-Cardama</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Pacios</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Twitter communication of university libraries in the face of Covid-19</article-title>
          , EPI (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3145/epi.
          <year>2020</year>
          .nov.
          <volume>18</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Gmiterek</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Polish university libraries social networking
          <article-title>services during the COVID-19 pandemic spring term lockdown</article-title>
          ,
          <source>The Journal of Academic Librarianship</source>
          <volume>47</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.acalib.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>102331</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Mansour</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Utilization of Online Learning Platforms by LIS Arab Faculty Members during the Coronavirus Outbreak</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Library &amp; Information Services in Distance Learning</source>
          <volume>15</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>18</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>40</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1080/1533290X.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>1896619</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Rafiq</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Ashiq</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. Ur</given-names>
            <surname>Rehman</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Yousaf</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A Content</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Analysis of the Websites of the World's Top 50 Universities in Medicine</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Science &amp; Technology Libraries</source>
          <volume>40</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>260</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>281</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1080/0194262X.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>1889446</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Ismail</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N. I.</given-names>
            <surname>Ramzi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. E. N.</given-names>
            <surname>Mohamed</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. S. H.</given-names>
            <surname>Razak</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Webometric Analysis of Institutional Repositories of Malaysian Public Universities</article-title>
          ,
          <source>DESIDOC Jl. Lib. Info. Technol</source>
          .
          <volume>41</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>130</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>139</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .14429/djlit.41.02.15649.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B. S.</given-names>
            <surname>Calvo</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Arquero</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Avilés</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Plataformas digitales y reputación académica: análisis del área de Biblioteconomía y Documentación en España</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Ibersid</source>
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>69</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>77</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .54886/ibersid.v14i1.
          <fpage>4692</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Ali</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Nabi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Gul</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Jan</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Web
          <volume>2</volume>
          .0 Tools in Indian University Libraries, Library Philosophy and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Practice</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). URL: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4432.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B. P.</given-names>
            <surname>Balaji</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
            <surname>Vinay</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Shalini</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
            <surname>Mohan</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Raju</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Web</source>
          <volume>2</volume>
          .
          <article-title>0 use in academic libraries of top ranked Asian universities</article-title>
          ,
          <source>EL</source>
          <volume>37</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <fpage>528</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>549</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1108/EL-12-2018-0248.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>K. C. H. Fong</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Au</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E. T. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lam</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>D. K. W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chiu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Social network services for academic libraries: A study based on social capital and social proof</article-title>
          ,
          <source>The Journal of Academic Librarianship</source>
          <volume>46</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.acalib.
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <volume>102091</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Taylor</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Open Access+
          <article-title>Service: reframing library support to take research outputs to nonacademic audiences</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Insights the UKSG journal 33</source>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>7</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1629/uksg.499.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Jiao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A Hybrid</given-names>
            <surname>Book</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Recommendation Algorithm Based on Context Awareness and Social Network</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Advanced Electronic Materials, Computers and Software Engineering (AEMCSE)</source>
          , IEEE, Shenzhen, China,
          <year>2020</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>554</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>561</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/AEMCSE50948.
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <volume>00122</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
            <surname>Williams</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I. P.</given-names>
            <surname>Saunderson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Dhoest</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Students' Perceptions of the Adoption</article-title>
          and
          <article-title>Use of Social Media in Academic Libraries: A UTAUT Study</article-title>
          ,
          <year>Communicatio</year>
          .
          <volume>47</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>76</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>94</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1080/02500167.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>1876123</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. T. W.</given-names>
            <surname>Chan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. H. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Lam</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. K. W.</given-names>
            <surname>Chiu</surname>
          </string-name>
          , From Facebook to Instagram:
          <article-title>Exploring user engagement in an academic library</article-title>
          ,
          <source>The Journal of Academic Librarianship</source>
          <volume>46</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.acalib.
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <volume>102229</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W. W. H.</given-names>
            <surname>Cheng</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. T. H.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lam</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>D. K. W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chiu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Social media as a platform in academic library marketing: A comparative study</article-title>
          ,
          <source>The Journal of Academic Librarianship</source>
          <volume>46</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.acalib.
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <volume>102188</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Neog</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Library Services Through Social Networking Sites: Perception and Attitudes of Research Scholars of Central Universities of Assam, Library Philosophy</article-title>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Practice (</surname>
          </string-name>
          e
          <source>-journal)</source>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). URL: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4585.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <surname>V. de J. C. Pinheiro</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P. B. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Paixão</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>C. de A. V. C.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Barroso, Evaluation of the use of twitter in the library system of the Federal University of Sergipe digital marketing strategies</article-title>
          ,
          <source>RDBCI: Rev. Digit. Bibliotecon. Cienc. Inf</source>
          .
          <volume>18</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .20396/rdbci.v18i0.
          <fpage>8661193</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          [20]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Alsuhaibani</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>One hundred tweets from library land: A case study of RMIT University Library (academic library) and State Library of Victoria (public state library) in Australia</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Librarianship and Information Science</source>
          <volume>52</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>197</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>207</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1177/0961000618792367.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          [21]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Hassanzadeh</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Saberi</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Doroudi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The Impact of Librarians' Individual Abilities on Using Social Networks in Iranian Libraries</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM) 18</source>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>65</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>72</lpage>
          . URL: https://ijism.ricest.ac.ir/index.php/ijism/article/view/1629.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          [22]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Ogunbodede</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Ivwighreghweta</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Librarians Use of Social Media in Promoting Effective Library Service Delivery in University Libraries in Edo and Delta States, Library Philosophy</article-title>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Practice (</surname>
          </string-name>
          e
          <source>-journal)</source>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). URL: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4577.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          [23]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Zobundžija</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Dragun</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Libraries of the university of Osijek on Facebook:
          <article-title>Why liking is important to us?,</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vjesn. bibl. Hrvat.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (Online)
          <volume>63</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>227</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>252</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .30754/vbh.63.1-
          <fpage>2</fpage>
          .
          <fpage>815</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          [24]
          <article-title>Konsolidovanyi reitynh vyshiv Ukrainy 2022 roku [Consolidated ranking of Ukrainian universities in 2020], Оsvita</article-title>
          .UA,
          <year>2021</year>
          . URL: http://osvita.ua/vnz/rating/51741/. i LDHLMU - Library of Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University ii NUKMAL - National University of Kyiv-Mohyla
          <string-name>
            <surname>Academy Library iii MSLTSNU - M. Maksymovych</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Scientific Library Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv iv STLDKPI - The Scientific</article-title>
          and Technical Library named after G.I. Denysenko of National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>