=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-3309/paper19 |storemode=property |title=Information-measuring Technology for Buildings Enclosing Structures Thermal Resistance Control |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3309/paper19.pdf |volume=Vol-3309 |authors=Oleg Dekusha,Svitlana Kovtun,Vladyslav Romanenko,Stanislav Sozonov |dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/ittap/DekushaKRS22 }} ==Information-measuring Technology for Buildings Enclosing Structures Thermal Resistance Control== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3309/paper19.pdf
Information-measuring Technology for Buildings Enclosing Structures
Thermal Resistance Control
Oleg L. Dekushaa, Svitlana I. Kovtuna, Vladyslav V. Romanenkoa , Stanislav V. Sozonova
a
     Energy Monitoring and Diagnostics Department; Institute of General Energy of NAS of Ukraine; 172, Antonovich
     str.,03150 Kyiv, Ukraine
                Abstract
                Improvement the heat-protective properties of the enclosing structures of buildings conducted mainly
                by introducing new building and heat-insulating materials and products that meet the increased
                regulatory requirements compliance with which allows minimize the level of heat losses. For
                calculation of heat losses one of the main informative characteristics is thermal resistance. Information-
                measuring technology for buildings enclosing structures thermal resistance control proposed which
                based on a combination of thermal imaging of the surface temperature for quality analysis and
                quantitative contact measurements of surface temperature and heat flux values. Shown advantages of
                this technology such as reduced the influence of the subjective factor on the control process, ability to
                identify local defects in thermal insulation, carry out control of enclosing structures that have a complex
                design, numerical thermal resistance values of the enclosing structures with accordance to metrological
                requirements. Presented practical application of information-measuring technology for control the
                thermal resistance of the buildings enclosing structures.

                Keywords 1
                Information-measuring technology, thermal resistance, temperature and heat flux sensors

1. Introduction
    The growth of energy production and consumption in the conditions of constant depletion of relevant resources brings
to the fore questions about their rational use and wide implementation of resource-saving measures. Currently the one of
the ways for solve this problem is to improve the heat-protective properties of the enclosing structures of buildings mainly
by introducing new building and heat-insulating materials and products that meet the increased regulatory requirements
compliance with which allows minimize the level of heat losses. For calculation of heat losses one of the main informative
characteristics is thermal resistance [1].
    For qualitive analysis used method based on thermal imaging technology. This method is regulated in standards ISO
6781 [2] and EN 13187 [3]. Thermal imaging method allows to identify local defects in thermal insulation by comparing
the surface temperature of different sections but does not make possible to determine the numerical values of the thermal
resistance of the enclosing structures and the heat losses of the building as whole.
    For buildings enclosing structures heat losses numerical analysis used methods based on the principle of heat balance
[1] and on contact measurements of heat flux [4-6].
    First one [1] allows determine the total transmission loss through the building enclosure constructions but in same time
not reveal defective or poorly insulated areas of enclosing structures.
    The method based on contact measurements [4-6] of heat flux through the building enclosure and the temperatures
provides the numerical thermal resistance values of the enclosing structures. Disadvantages of the method are difficulty
to detect local defects and large labor costs for fixing primary sensors on surfaces of various sections which manifested in
the inspection of large buildings enclosing structures with large heat exchange surfaces and thermal fields that are non-
uniform in space. Based on contact method proposed different approaches for calculation of thermal resistance [7-9].
    Also important to analyze systems for measuring the thermal characteristics of buildings and structural elements based
on contact measurements [4-6]. For this task we compare five measurement systems by such well-known firms as
Hukseflux (TRSYS01 High-accuracy building thermal resistance measuring system with two measurement locations)

ITTAP’2022: 2nd International Workshop on Information Technologies: Theoretical and Applied Problems, November 22–24, 2022, Ternopil, Ukraine
EMAIL:olds@ukr.net (A. 1); sveta_kovtun@ukr.net (A. 2); vlad.romanenko.24@gmail.com (A. 3); swiftpolyscientist@gmail.com (A. 4)
ORCID: 0000-0003-3836-0485 (A. 1); 0000-0002-6596-3460 (A. 2); 0000-0002-3227-4183 (A. 3); 0000-0002-7584-4529 (A. 4)
             ©️ 2022 Copyright for this paper by its authors.
             Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
             CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)
 [10]; Green TEG AG (gO Measurement-System for the assessment of U-value, humidity and further parameters) [11];
 FluxTeq (FluxTeq R-value measurement System) [12] and Information-measuring system created by scientists group of
 NASU [13]. Technical characteristics presented in table 1. The disadvantage for measuring systems were considered the
 use the heat flux sensors one type and size, which makes it impossible to conduct studies of various elements of the
 building and small number of measuring channels, which limits the number of control zones, does not allow monitoring
 of complex form building enclosures.
     The aim of the work is to create an information-measuring technology for control the thermal resistance of the buildings
 enclosing structures of any scale and configuration. Analyze approach for metrological characteristics determination and
 verification. Check practical application of information-measuring technology for control the thermal resistance of the
 buildings enclosing structures.
 Table 1.
 SYSTEMS FOR MEASURING THE THERMAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS

                           TRSYS01              FluxDAQ         Heat Flux           gOMS                        NASU
                           Hukseflux                             Meter           greenTEG AG
                         (Netherlands)            (USA)          (USA)           (Switzerland)                (Ukraine)

 Number of                        6                  8                 8                  5                    8 … 160
 channels
 Measuring                        2                  2                 2                  2                    2 … 40
 zones
 Type of heat                HFP01            PHFS-01e            HFP01                  No                with thermal
 flux sensors                                                                       information            correction

 Range of heat flux        1 … 2000            1 … 150           1 … 2000                No                   1 … 2000
values, W/m²                                                                        information
 Relative error                ±3%                ±3%               ±3%                 ±3%                   ± 1.5… ± 3%
 of heat flux
 measuring, %
 Temperature                Thermo-       Thermo- couples Thermistor              No information          Thermo-couples,
 sensors                     couples                                                                           Pt100

 Range of                  -30 … +70          -50 … +120        -30 … +70          -30 … +70              -30 … +100
 temperature
 values, °С
  Absolute error of               1                  1                 1                  1                    0.5 … 1
temperature
measurement, K
 Method of research        ISO 9869           ISO 9869           ISO 9869           ISO 9869                ISO 9869


 2. Theoretical basis and methodology for determining thermal resistance through
    the enclosing structures
         For realization information-measuring technology required a set of measurement methods and hardware-software
 modules integrated for the purpose of collecting, processing, storing and using measurement information. Also important
 part is metrological analysis determination and verification of sensors used in systems [14]. Constituent elements of
 information-measuring technology is presented in figure 1.
                 Hardware                                     Software for registration
           implementation of the                                 and processing of
             thermal resistance                                    measurement
               control system                                       information



                                   Information-measuring
                                         technology


                                                                    Methodology of the
                                                                    thermal resistance
           Metrological analysis                                    control of enclosing
                                                                        structures
Figure 1: Constituent elements of information-measuring technology

          Methodology of the thermal resistance control of enclosing buildings proposed to base on a combination of
thermal imaging of the surface temperature of enclosing structures which provides qualitive information according to ISO
6781 and with numerical contact measurements of surface temperature and heat flux values in accordance with ISO 9869
[6]. This gives possibility to identify local defects in thermal insulation by comparing the surface temperature of different
sections and make possible to determine the numerical values of the thermal resistance of the enclosing structures and the
heat losses of the building. In figure 2 presented Methodology of the thermal resistance control of Enclosing Structures
(ES). The methodology demonstrates a step-by-step control procedure. For each stage, the input data necessary for
carrying out the relevant procedures at a certain stage are shown. In particular the conditions of conducting the experiment
and the applied instrumentation. Also, the output obtained at each stage are shown.
    The thermal imaging survey of the entire building is carried out in accordance with ISO 6781 [2]. This makes it possible
to identify the features of the internal structure and composition of the fragments of the enclosing structure being examined
(the presence of areas with unequal technical characteristics, heat-conducting inclusions, assemblies, butt joints, hidden
manufacturing defects, etc.) which lead to thermal heterogeneity. Thus, representative areas are defined and areas with
anomalous temperature distribution for this type of design.
    At the second stage, in representative areas, measurements are carried out with the use of temperature and heat flux
sensors. This allows us to obtain a quantitative estimate of local heat losses, as well as to calculate the thermal resistance
of the enclosing structures.
    When installing heat flow sensors at the appropriate location of the object being inspected, the following rules must
be followed:

─ the location of the installation of heat flow sensors must be selected in the area corresponding to the one-dimensionality
  of the measured heat flow at a distance from units that have high thermal susceptibility (eg metal mortise parts,
  ventilation system elements, etc.);
─ the surface at the location of the heat flow sensors must be cleaned prior to removal of appreciable roughness and free
  from curvature;
─ there must be no air in the plane of contact with the object;
─ heat flow sensors must be shielded from any external influences that cause a temperature gradient to appear on the
  surface of the heat flow sensors;
─ emissivity coefficient of the heat-sensing surface of the heat-flow sensors must be close to the degree of blackness of
  the surface being examined. Its value should not differ from the value of the blackness of the surveyed surface by more
  than ± 0,03.




Figure 2: Methodology of the thermal resistance control of Enclosing Structures (ES).

        For processing of measurement information used next method based on [1,15,16,17].
         The current values of the measured heat flux density q (W/m2) by the secondary measuring devices, is calculated
                                                                      і

as a product of current readings of measured the signals of heat flux sensors Е (mV), with calibration coefficient of heat
                                                                                         і

flux sensors K sensor (W/(mV·m2)) by the formula:
                                                              qі = К sensor  Еі ,                                          (1)

         According to the results of measuring the current values of heat flux q , the temperature of surfaces Ti and Te
                                                                                         і                          i        i
                         Air        Air
, the air near them Ti         and T
                                   ei     for each n-type zone of the N obtained by the contact method and calculate averaged
                      i

over a period of time values.
   These values are averaged over a single full day (24 hours) or over several full days. For the averaged of the listed
values, the arithmetic means of the current values of each quantity, measured at regular intervals, should be taken. Also,
possible to apply wavelet analysis [18].
   Next, for each n-type zone of the N surveyed calculate for all-averaged values of the measured values, the averaged
values of such parameters:
         • the temperature difference by the formula:
                                                              Tstructuren = Tin − Ten ;                                    (2)
   where n = 1, 2, …, N;
      • the temperature head by the formula:
                                                              T Air = TinAir − TenAir ;                                    (3)
        •   the temperature difference between the environment and the adjacent surface of the zone, i.e. at the
            corresponding boundary layer, by the formulas:
                                                        Tint ernaln = TinAir − Tin ,                                       (4)

                                                        Texternaln = Ten − TenAir .                                        (5)
    For each n-type zone of the N surveyed, the average values of the basic thermal characteristics of the enclosing
structures are calculated, namely the thermal resistance, based on formulas (2) and (1):
                                                              Rstructuren = Tstructuren q n ,                              (6)

   Given the known average values of the coefficients of heat transfer  i ,  e and thermal resistance Rstructure , the
                                                                                                                        n


average value of the resistance to heat transfer R n through the n-type section is calculated by the formula:

                                                                          Rn = 1/  i + Rstructuren + 1/  e .             (7)
         For specific types of enclosure structures, as known values of heat transfer coefficients  i and  e , as a rule, its
take regulatory data:  e = 23 W/(m2·K) and  i = 8 W/(m2·K).
   Scheme of determining thermal resistance through the enclosing structure is shown on figure 3.




Figure 3: Scheme of determining thermal resistance through the enclosing structure.
        According to standard [15,16,17], for each of the building components of the building enclosing, the thermally
homogeneous areas that make up their structure must be indicated (for example, for a building wall fragment, these are
brickwork, reinforced concrete floors, panels, joints of panels, etc.). The following information should also be provided:
                                        N
─ the total area of zones of each type  An ,
                                       n =1
                                                         M
─ the total length of all heat-conducting inclusions  l m ,
                                                         m =1

─ the total area of all surveyed building elements A .
    If, for any characteristic zone, measurements are made at several points (for example, three in the height of the room),
the average arithmetic values of thermal resistance and heat transfer resistance are recorded.
    The average values of the reduced thermal resistance and the reduced thermal transfer resistance through the building
elements of the building envelope must also be calculated:

─ the average value of the reduced thermal resistance calculated for a thermally non-uniform building element of a
  building envelope containing N types of characteristic thermally homogeneous sections is calculated by the formula:

                                                                       (                       )
                                                   N            N
                                            Ravg =  An          An Rstructuren ,                                             (8)
                                                  n =1          n =1


─ the average value of the reduced resistance to heat transfer through a thermally inhomogeneous enclosure structure (or
  inhomogeneous envelope element) containing N types of characteristic thermally homogeneous sections is calculated
  by the formula:

                                                                                       (                   )
                                                                    N           N
                                                   R avg =  An /  An / R n ,                                               (9)
                                                                 n =1           n =1


─ the average value of the reduced resistance to heat transfer through an inhomogeneous enclosure structure, which
  contains in addition to N types of characteristic thermally homogeneous sections of M linear thermal conductive
  inclusions with known values of the linear coefficients of heat transfer U l m , calculated by the formula:

                                                              N                              
                                                                                (
                                                  RrrПР = А   An / R n +  (U l m  lm )  .  )
                                                                               M
                                                                                                                              (10)
                                                               n =1          m =1
                                                                                              
    Additionally calculate the value of the reduced heat flux density through a thermally inhomogeneous zone containing
in addition to N types of characteristic thermally homogeneous sections of M linear thermal conductive inclusions:
                                                                           Т Air  N
                                                                                           (                   )
                                                                                                          ( lm U l m ) .
                                                                                                      M
                                                             rr
                                                           q avg =                    A  R        +                         (11)
                                                                            А  n =1
                                                             f                          n   avg n
                                                                                                     m =1               
    According to these estimates, as needed the following values can be further calculated the average value of the
transmission coefficient of heat transfer through the enclosing structures of the building (structure) by the formula:
                                                              N
                                                                                (                
                                                     Т Air =   An / Ravgn +  ( lm  U l m )  А ;)
                                                                                 M
                                        U tr = q avg
                                                 rr
                                                 f                                                                            (12)
                                                               n =1            m =1
                                                                                                 

3. Metrological characteristics studding

     For studding metrological characteristics of control system by the heat flux density used a radiation comparator [14]
at two values of normalized surface density of heat flux: (250 ± 10) W/m2 and (500 ± 20) W/m2. The advantage of using
radiation comparator is ability to study sensors in any shape but condition is ensuring the same emissivity of the heat-
sensing surfaces of the investigated and reference sensors. The results were obtained by comparison of the output signals
of the investigated sensors with the signal of the reference sensor [14]. The maximum values of the heat flux density
measurement errors are given in Tables 2 and 3. The main relative error when measuring the surface heat flux density
does not exceed a limit of ± 3%.
Table 2.
Results of experimental studies of the metrological characteristics of the developed system in the mode of
measurement of heat flux at a heat flux density ≈250 W/m2.
                                                 Heat flux density       Heat flux density
   Channel,            Conversion                                                          Relative error of
                                                 measured by the         measured by the
   sensor      number, coefficient                                                         heat          flux
                                                 reference sensor        studied    sensor
   designation         [W/(m²·mV)]                                                         measurement   [%]
                                                 [W/m2]                  [W/m2]
  25, №16793, q1          1.60               249.7                246.2                –1.40
  26, №16794, q2          1.78               249.5                251.6                0.84
  27, №16795, q3          1.58               249.6                251.8                0.88
  28, №16796, q4          1.52               249.8                247.5                –0.92
  29, №16797, q5          1.59               249.4                246.9                –1.00
  30, №16798, q6          1.99               249.3                246.1                –1.28
  31, №16799, q7          1.66               249.6                247.2                –0.96
  32, №16800, q8          1.73               249.7                247.1                –0.99
Table 3.
Results of experimental studies of the metrological characteristics of the developed system in the mode of
measurement of heat flux at a heat flux density ≈500 W/m2.
                                            Heat flux density Heat flux density
  Channel,      sensor Conversion                                                      Relative error of
                                            measured by the measured by the
  number,                coefficient,                                                  heat           flux
                                            reference, sensor studied         sensor
  designation            [W/(m²·mV)]                                                   measurement   [%]
                                            [W/m2]                [W/m2]
  25, № 16793, q1        1.60               495.7                 493.1                –0.56
  26, № 16794, q2        1.78               496.0                 493.2                –0.56
  27, №16795, q3         1.58               495.8                 497.1                0.26
  28, №16796, q4         1.52               495.7                 497.8                0.42
  29, №16797, q5         1.59               495.6                 497.5                0.38
  30, №16798, q6         1.99               495.7                 495.2                –0.11
  31, №16799, q7         1.66               495.6                 493.1                –0.50
  32, №16800, q8         1.73               495.5                 495.8                0.06

      Metrological characteristics of 22 thermoelectric temperature sensors (thermocouples) of the system was determined
by comparing temperature values obtained by the corresponding channels of the developed system with the working
standard: RTD thermocouple Pt-100 in U2C ultra thermostat. The absolute value of the temperature measurement error
was performed at two temperature values: 0 °C and +50 °C. The absolute error of temperature measurement in 22 channels
of the developed system was experimentally determined. The values of the temperature measurement errors are presented
in Tables 4 and 5.
     The absolute error of temperature measurement does not exceed the set limit of ± 1 °C.
Table 4.
Results of experimental studies of the metrological characteristics of the developed system in the
temperature measurement mode at ≈0 °С.
                         Temperature measured by the Temperature           Absolute
  Channel,       sensor working reference thermal- measured by the temperature
  number, designation    resistance   sensor   Pt-100 studied sensor measurement
                         №1332 [°С]                     [°С]               error [°С]
  1, №2893, T1           0.5                            0.8                –0.3
  2, №2894, T2           0.5                            0.37               0.13
  3, №2895, T3           0.5                            0.58               –0.08
  4, №2896, T4           0.5                            0.65               –0.15
  5, №2897, T5           0.5                            0.91               –0.41
  6, №2898, T6           0.5                            0.82               –0.32
  7, №2899, T7           0.5                            0.74               –0.24
  8, №2900, T8           0.5                            0.7                –0.2
  9, №2901, T9           0.5                            0.47               0.03
  10, №2902, T10         0.5                            0.67               –0.17
  11, №2903, T11         0.5                            0.83               –0.33
  12, №2904, T12         0.5                            0.63               –0.13
  13, №2905, T13         0.5                            0.36               0.14
  14, №2906, T14         0.5                            0.72               –0.22
  15, №2907, T15         0.5                            0.45               0.05
  16, №2908, T16         0.5                            0.63               –0.13
  17, №2909, T17         0.5                            0.77               –0.27
  18, №2910, T19         0.5                            0.56               –0.06
  19, №2911, T19         0.5                            0.43               0.07
  20, №2912, T20         0.5                            0.59               –0.09
  21, №2913, T21         0.5                            0.83               –0.33
  22, №2914, T22         0.5                            0.8                –0.3
Table 5.
Results of experimental studies of the metrological characteristics of the developed system in the
temperature measurement mode at ≈50 °С.
                       Temperature measured by Temperature              Absolute
  Channel,    sensor
                       working reference thermal- measured by the temperature
  number,
                       resistance  sensor   Pt-100 studied sensor, measurement
  designation
                       №1332, [°С]                   [°С]               error, [°С]
  1, №2893, T1         49.92                         49.72              0.2
  2, №2894, T2         49.92                         50.14              –0.22
  3, №2895, T3         49.92                         49.62              0.3
  4, №2896, T4         49.92                         49.55              0.37
  5, №2897, T5         49.92                         50.06              –0.14
  6, №2898, T6         49.92                         49.82              0.1
  7, №2899, T7         49.92                         50.11              –0.19
  8, №2900, T8         49.92                         49.74              0.18
  9, №2901, T9         49.92                         50.03              –0.11
  10, №2902, T10       49.92                         49.81              0.11
  11, №2903, T11       49.92                         50.05              –0.13
  12, №2904, T12       49.92                         49.79              0.13
  13, №2905, T13       49.92                         49.99              –0.07
  14, №2906, T14       49.92                         50.02              –0.1
  15, №2907, T15       49.92                         49.83              0.09
  16, №2908, T16       49.92                         50.1               –0.18
  17, №2909, T17       49.92                         49.68              0.24
  18, №2910, T19       49.92                         49.82              0.1
  19, №2911, T19       49.92                         50.01              –0.09
  20, №2912, T20       49.92                         49.62              0.3
  21, №2913, T21       49.92                         49.72              0.2
  22, №2914, T22       49.92                         50.14              –0.22

4. Practical application of information-measuring technology for control the
   thermal resistance of the buildings enclosing structures
       The study of a sixteen-storey residential building was conducted.
       The building structure is a precast concrete frame with precast ceilings and precast foundation slab. The exterior
walls of the building are made of reinforced concrete 100 mm thick, expanded clay concrete 200 mm thick, and 100 mm
thick plaster layer. The attic and technical floor are cold. There is piping in the attic. Translucent structures (windows,
balcony doors) made of double-glazed windows in wooden dividing frames. The building has water heating, hot water
supply, which is connected to the district heating system. The total number of apartments is 112. The total height of the
house is 52.605 m, the height of the basement is 2.7 m. The building has one stairwell and two lifts. The heated area of
the building is 9021 m2. The heated volume of the building is 27064 m3. The total area of external envelopes is 7065 m2.
       At the first stage, a thermal imaging survey of the entire building is carried out according to ISO 6781 [2] and EN
13187 [3]. Thermal imaging allowed to obtain qualitative detection of thermal irregularities in building envelopes [2] and
locate areas with uniform temperature distribution where temperature and heat flux sensors can be placed.
       The photographs and thermal images of the building envelope are presented below. Line and dot markers represent
areas with a higher temperature than the entire wall. These are heat loss zones that require special attention. A dot marker
also indicates the area with normal surface temperature.
       Figure 4 shows the zones of significant thermal heterogeneity of the side wall.
Figure 4: Thermal image of the side wall of a 16-storey building

    In Figure 4 the joints of floors and walls are marked with the increased heat losses in the area of the panel perpendicular
to the facade.




Figure 5: Thermal image of joints of the 16-storey building facade
   In Figure 5 shown cold bridges on joints witch requires attention. Figure 6 shows that the envelope, which is
perpendicular to the building facade, is a cold bridge and requires insulation.




Figure 6: Thermal image of the face-wall of the 16-storey building
       The thermal image in Figure 7 shows the areas with high heat losses at the entrance to the building.
Figure 7: Thermal image of the building entrance

    The thermal image shown in Figure 8 markers indicate the areas where heating appliances (heating system radiators)
are located. As it can be seen from the temperature indicators the lack of thermal insulation in these zones leads to increased
heat losses.




Figure 8: Thermal image of zones with high heat losses

    At the second stage, the measurements with the use of temperature and heat flux sensors are carried out according to
ISO 9869 [6]. This allows us to obtain a quantitative estimate of local heat losses, as well as to calculate the thermal
resistance of the envelope structures.
    Not all required building envelope elements, for example such as overlapping of the 16th floor, overlapping of the
ground floor, can be studied with in-situ measurement of thermal resistance. For these envelope elements representative
samples were taken and thermal conductivity was measured with the device described in [13]
    The third stage is calculation of thermal resistance based on obtained results. The results of determining the geometric
and thermal characteristics of the envelope structure according to [6] are shown in table 6.
        By using thermal imaging of the surface temperature of envelope structures in accordance with ISO 6781 we
managed to detect local structural defects and identify certain location of the installation of heat flux sensors, making the
measurement process more effective.
        During the experiments up to 8 zones were monitored simultaneously using the measurement units connected via
RS-485 and radio frequency modules which made it possible to monitor whole buildings in the same conditions. If we
used a monitoring system with only two measurement zones for this task, it would lead to a significant increase in
measurement time.
Table 6.
The results of determining the geometric and thermal characteristics of the building envelope
  Building envelope element       Area of elements of the envelope        Thermal resistance (R)
                                  structure, m2
  Facade walls                    2699                                    0.81
  Windows                         303                                     0.3
  Loggias, including:
  - external panel                1106                                    0.24
  - loggia glazing                1567                                    0.18
  - the inner wall                1792                                    0.81
  - internal glazing              883                                     0.42
  Technical floor:
  - outside walls                 325.9                                   0.81
  - roofing                       648                                     0.26
  - overlapping of the 16th floor 648                                     0.44
  Underfloor:
  - outside walls                 139.7                                   0.81
  - overlapping of the ground 648                                         0.4
  floor                           784.7                                   4.2
  - envelope on soil

5. Conclusions
        Information-measuring technology for buildings enclosing structures thermal resistance control proposed which
based on a combination of thermal imaging of the surface temperature for quality analysis and quantitative contact
measurements of surface temperature and heat flux values. Advantages of this technology are: reduced the influence of
the subjective factor on the control process; ability to identify local defects in thermal insulation; carry out control of
enclosing structures that have a complex design; numerical thermal resistance values of the enclosing structures with
accordance to metrological requirements.
        Presented practical application of information-measuring technology for control the thermal resistance of the
buildings enclosing structures on example of sixteen-storey residential building. It is shown that the modular construction
of the system gives possibility to carry out control of enclosing structures that have a complex design.

6. References
    [1] ISO 6946, Building Components and Building Elements – Thermal Resistance and Thermal Transmittance – Calculation
Method, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.
    [2] ISO 6781-2015. Thermal performance of building – Qualitative detection of thermal ir-regularities in building envelopes –
Infrared method..
    [3] EN 13187-1998, Thermal performance of buildings - Qualitative detection of thermal irregularities in building envelopes -
Infrared method.
    [4] ISO 8301, Thermal Insulation – Determination of Steady-State Thermal Resistance and Related Properties – Heat Flow Meter
Apparatus, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1991.
    [5] ASTM C 1155-95, Standard practice for determining thermal resistance of building envelope components from the in-situ data.
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, 2001.
    [6] ISO 9869-1, Thermal insulation–Building elements–In-situ measurement of thermal resistance and thermal transmittance–Part
1: Heat flow meter method, International Organization for Standardization, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
    [7] P. Biddulph, V. Gori, C. A. Elwell, C. Scott, C. Rye, R. Lowe, & T. Oreszczyn, Inferring the thermal resistance and effective
thermal mass of a wall using frequent temperature and heat flux measurements. Energy and Buildings. 78 (2014) 10–16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.004
    [8] Yanxiao Feng, Qiuhua Duan, Julian Wang, Stuart Baur, Approximation of building window properties using in situ
measurements. Building and Environment. 169 (2020) 106590 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106590
    [9] G. Baldinelli, F. Bianchi, Windows thermal resistance: Infrared thermography aided comparative analysis among finite volumes
simulations and experimental methods. Applied Energy. 136 (2014) 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.021
    [10] TRSYS01       building     thermal     resistance    measuring     system     brochure.   Hukseflux      Termal      Sensors,
https://www.hukseflux.com/uploads/product-documents/TRSYS01_v1807.pdf.
    [11] GоMeasurement-System: greenTEG AG, https://www.greenteg.com/template/MM-U-Value/gO-Measurement-Brochure-
Engl.pdf.
    [12] FluxDAQ, http://www.fluxteq.com/heat-flux-thermocouple-data-logger.
    [13] V. Babak, O. Dekusha, S. Kovtun, S. Ivanov, Information-measuring system for monitoring thermal resistance. CEUR
Workshop Proceedings. 2387 (2019) 102-110. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2387/20190102.pdf
    [14] O. Hotra, S. Kovtun, O. Dekusha, Analysis of the characteristics of bimetallic and semiconductor heat flux sensors for in-situ
measurements of envelope element thermal resistance, Measurement 182 (2021) 109713
    [15] ISO 14683, Thermal bridges in building construction -- Linear thermal transmittance -- Simplified methods and default values.
ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
    [16] ISO 10211-1, Thermal bridges in building construction – Heat flows and surface temperatures – Part 1: General calculation
methods. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1995.
    [17] ISO 10211-2, Thermal bridges in building construction – Calculation of heat flows and surface temperatures – Part 2: Linear
thermal bridges. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001
    [18] Hotra, O., Kovtun, S., Dekusha, O., Grądz, Ż. Prospects for the application of wavelet analysis to the results of thermal
conductivity express control of thermal insulation materials, Energies, 2021, 14(17), 5223