<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>M. Kowsari, M. Garousi, Edutainment games and mental skills, Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. &amp; Hum.,.</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Online Communication Simulating Spaces for Teaching Effective Foreign Language Communication</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Antonina Badan</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nataliia Onishchenko</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Oleksii Zeniakin</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Olha Yanholenko</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>2, Valentynivska str., Kharkiv, 61168</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Kyrpychova str. 2, Kharkiv, 61002</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Vasyl Karazin National University Kharkiv</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>4, Svobody Sq, Kharkiv, 61022</addr-line>
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>2018</issue>
      <fpage>2279</fpage>
      <lpage>2298</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>education. The digital era of online foreign language learning soared with the complete shift towards distance communication under pandemic, and for Ukrainian education further on with the start of the Russian war in Ukraine, and is in its full swing nowadays. A team of scholars from two Ukrainian-based universities joined their efforts in analyzing and developing innovative computer-mediated technologies to provide efficient and sustainable online This paper is the third in a row following two previous studies of online communication, namely, of multimedia technologies and communication simulation published in 2021 and 2022, and examines the impact of introducing newly developed simulating platforms in the domain of foreign language learning. The article presents the results of the conducted experiment based on the use of digital simulating tools to improve effective communication online. It describes in detail the two surveys conducted at the end of the semester and compares the extent to which the new simulating platforms raised communicative competence in a foreign language of both students and teachers and conditioned the positive academic outcome despite various globaland national-scale challenges. The hypothesis put forward at the beginning of the semester that teaching of effective communication in foreign languages online can most efficiently be achieved through modern digital tools that the young generation is so familiar with was completely supported by the survey answers at the end of it. Furthermore, the research revealed some important issues to be given a deeper insight, like ecolinguistics, non-verbal communication, generation gap and media competence that outline the prospective research in the given area. Communication simulating spaces (CSS), digital tools, ecolinguistics, edutainment, effective communication, E-learning, foreign language communicative competence, movement COLINS-2023: 7th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems, April 20-21, 2023, Kharkiv, Ukraine ORCID: 0000-0001-5898-4397 (A. Badan); 0000-0002-9387-4991 (N. Onishchenko); 0000-0001-8937-6044 (O. Zeniakin); 0000-00017755-1255 (O. Yanholenko);</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Online communication is a multiple indicator of the modern technological era in education,
business, and country development. It is an indispensable element of all spheres of human
development and is an absolute must to be considered by governments, academics, and technicians
alike. ‘Communication’ as such has been long ousted in scholarly studies by more detailed and
sophisticated ‘effective communication’ in all spheres of human activity and is now being studied and
developed on a par with the constantly evolving digital tools to support its numerous needs in
teaching and learning at large.
EMAIL:
(N.</p>
      <p>Onishchenko);</p>
      <p>2023 Copyright for this paper by its authors.</p>
      <p>
        Our primary concern in the present study is to analyze how digital tools can facilitate and provide
for further development of effective online communication in dangerous environments, namely, under
recent pandemic [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] and the current most challenging for Ukraine war-time period of the Russian
aggression. In fact, the present study continues the previous research in the field of developing
massmedia technologies by a team of collaborating scholars in Ukraine of National Technical University
‘Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute’ and Vasyl Karazin Kharkiv National University, both Ukrainian-based
and doing research predominantly in the field of foreign language learning.
      </p>
      <p>Both universities have been fully immersed in online learning for quite a number of years due to
the challenges of the Covid isolation only to continue online education even on a greater scale with
the start of the Russian invasion which dispersed both teachers and the students throughout Ukraine
and the European Union.</p>
      <p>
        However, the shift from blended learning or combination of traditional and online [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref2">1, 2</xref>
        ] to
complete distance learning (E-learning) has been nothing but smooth and less painful than before just
as a result of the previous experience of extensive use of modern digital tools under the Covid
pandemic.
      </p>
      <p>The issue of effective foreign language learning continuously arises in the course of technological
improvement of digital tools and online platforms and the development of innovative teaching
methods alike. Consequently, the study under question tackles the spheres of modern educational
activities to identify both breakthroughs and shortcomings in the merge of tangible (digital tools) and
intangible (human relationships in communication) worlds.</p>
      <p>
        To be more exact, the present research being the continuation of the previous explorations of 1)
multimedia technologies integrated into traditional and blended learning [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] and 2) the introduction
of newly-developed simulating platforms [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] is due to concentrate further on the nature and the
assignments of incorporating real-life and online effective communication features aimed at building
up-to-date scholarly approach of facilitating online foreign language learning with the help of
digital simulators.
      </p>
      <p>It was also important to support the vision of innovative blended approaches (media
communication, online communication simulation and the development of simulating digital
platforms) with the results of students’ and teachers’ surveys on the subjects of the study. All of the
above allowed us to create the new approach and teaching technology of effective communication
skills described below.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Related Works</title>
      <p>To start the description of the present state of affairs in the modern trends of effective
communication research, that is nowadays closely connected with different interdisciplinary fields of
science like ecolinguistics, or multimodal studies covering non-verbal means of message transmission
as well as their simulation in online academic environment, be it via such applications like
SpatialChat, or others, it is of paramount importance to specify what exactly is meant by ‘effective
communication’ in this paper.</p>
      <p>
        As a matter of fact, all of the environments and domains mentioned here adhere to the principle of
cooperation by H. Paul Grice [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], supplemented by 4 maxims of communication:
 The Maxim of Quality (you should only say things you believe to be true; you should not say
things that you cannot back up with evidence).
 The Maxim of Quantity (you should make your contribution to the conversation as
informative as necessary; you should not make your contribution more informative than
necessary).
 The Maxim of Relevance (you should only say things that are relevant to the conversation).
 The Maxim of Manner (you should avoid obscurity or ambiguity; you should be brief and
orderly; you should try and be as clear as possible).
      </p>
      <p>For successful communication, these maxims must be observed by all participants in the
communicative situation.</p>
      <p>
        Modern theories of practical business communication [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] point to 7 principles, based on Grice’s
maxims and ensuring successful interaction in a professional environment. This is the aim of teaching
students at the Department of Business Foreign Language and Translation of the University.
      </p>
      <p>‘The 7Cs of Communication’ (alliteration as a memo-technique allows students to easily
remember these rules) are:</p>
      <p>Clarity. The communicators have to be clear about the goal and the purpose of their message and
deliver it in a right understandable way.</p>
      <p>Conciseness. The communicators have to keep to the point and keep it short and simple without
using unnecessary words and structures.</p>
      <p>Concreteness can be achieved by using enough detail to get the message across. Using less detail
than necessary makes the message ambiguous, too much of that produces communicative noise and
distracts the recipient from the point.</p>
      <p>Correctness. The content of the message must be transparent for the recipient, so that the addresser
has to avoid grammar, spelling, or pronunciation mistakes.</p>
      <p>Coherence. The message must be well-structured and laid out logically, its tone remains the same
throughout.</p>
      <p>Completeness of the message means that the recipients have everything they need to understand
the message and are not left with many questions to ask. It is important for the addresser to check for
understanding.</p>
      <p>Courtesy means the message is polite, friendly, professional, open, and honest. The addresser
should check the message from the recipient’s point of view to be empathetic towards the recipient’s
needs.</p>
      <p>Following the 7Cs of communication makes delivering the messages much more effective.</p>
      <p>Compliance with these rules in their combination leads us to the ‘eighth C’ – Communicative
Competence.</p>
      <p>
        Generally speaking, the competence itself as both the scientific term and phenomenon has long
been debated within the specialized scientific literature [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6 ref7 ref8">6, 7, 8</xref>
        ]. Being a real scientific issue, it
attracts numerous scholars to solve the main problem about its final definition: whether it is a part of
something bigger that can be roughly called professionalism, or is it professionalism in any given area
itself but dubbed in another way [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]?
      </p>
      <p>In this paper, we will refer to the competence as a sum of all the knowledge and skills (both hard
and soft ones) that can be applied in a particular area to achieve a positive result. We do not level
professionalism and competence for it is our firm contention that professionalism is a skill of using
your competence in an adequate way. On a par, it becomes clear there is a very long list of
competencies that are connected with various spheres of human’s life. For us, however, the most
important one is the aforementioned communicative competence.</p>
      <p>
        Recently, both foreign and national scholars alike have widely covered the subject in their works
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref9">9, 10</xref>
        ]. Still, there is something that can be deduced from the great variety of viewpoints. First, it is
the language that basically affects the formation of communicative competence, since a big part of
communication is done verbally. Second, the definition of this competence is obviously very clear and
easy to conclude: this is a skill of communication (N.B.: not the ability to communicate).
Consequently, provided we speak about students mastering a foreign language, then they participate
in the process of their foreign language communicative competence formation being done by
university specialists via honing learners’ skills which condition positive communicative outcomes.
      </p>
      <p>The skills that ensure following the principles were included in the teachers’ and students’ surveys
with the analysis presented below.</p>
      <p>
        The 7Cs were further implemented in a number of training practical courses for all interested but
in a reduced form of 5Cs: clear, correct, complete, concise, and compassionate, as recommended by
one of the most up-to-date practical courses of effective communication [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]. It is clear there is no
contradiction between the two definitions, however, strengthening of the ‘courtesy’ principle and even
extending it to ‘compassion’ or even ‘empathy’ seems more appropriate for analyzing challenging or
dangerous environments, as in our case of the war-time emotions of both communicating sides, or
even previously under pandemic.
      </p>
      <p>
        The C-principles unavoidably examine and foster human behavior which in its turn involves the
tone of voice (even in telephone conversation) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]. The same author cites S. Ober’s view: “Tone in
writing refers to the writer’s attitude towards the reader and the subject of the message. The overall
tone of a written message affects the reader just as one’s tone of voice affects the listener in everyday
exchanges” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ]. Your tone can be brusque or subtle, courteous, respectful or indifferent, and in this
paper we mostly refer to our written comments on the students’ ensuing essays in the corporate
emailing or oral communication in computer-mediated classes. Both serve as communication
simulation and suitable practical tools for the students themselves as well.
      </p>
      <p>
        As a rule, scholars normally point out the differences in the peer and teacher-student
communication, as online learning involves both: when teachers talk to students, and when
communication among students occurs either sporadically or under the teacher’s guidance. According
to the authors of studies in this field, control, trust, and intimacy are essential in any kind of
interpersonal relationship [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ]. In addition, the development of teacher-student relationship is closely
linked to a number of factors:
1. whether they met before online learning face-to-face;
2. whether they feel comfortable with each other online;
3. whether they have contacts outside online classes (by email correspondence or under their
teacher’s guidance for their internet home-based work or to prepare online presentations);
4. whether the teacher and the students are participants of any kind of out-of-class activities
which is of crucial importance to establish trust, control and intimacy in their mutual efforts to
achieve the results ;
5. whether the peer relationships in a class are healthy and productive;
6. and, finally, whether both students and the teacher enjoy identical proficiency of using digital
tools.
      </p>
      <p>Here, the fifth factor reflects the state of affairs when communication in any environment must be
harmonious.</p>
      <p>The harmony within the communicative environment is currently being studied by the new
linguistic discipline formed by blending linguistics proper and ecology which is known under the
umbrella term ‘ecolinguistics’. Although disputed concerning the differentiation of various terms, in
this paper, we will refer to this new interdisciplinary scientific flow as both ecolinguistics or the
linguistic ecology. As visible from the name of ecolinguistics itself, this science is concerned
primarily with studying the connection between ecology and communication, for the language
(lingua) is the main instrument of its construction.</p>
      <p>
        The research area of ecolinguistics is very broad covering issues from cognitive underpinnings of
human’s perception of the world which then results in their practical attitude towards the nature
(cf. global warming triggered by enhanced human activities) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ] to analyzing media framing of the
nature which conditions the position of environmental safety in the system of human values
(cf. anthropocentrism vs. ecocentrism) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        It is noteworthy that one can see an interesting division of research strands in the modern
ecolinguistics that can be easily described as the binary opposition the West vs. the East (the latter,
namely, Post-Soviet countries). The former flow of the linguistic ecology is mainly connected with
the analysis of how the nature is mirrored in the system of human language [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17 ref18">17, 18</xref>
        ], whilst the latter
discuss the processes in the language itself holding that it is also an ecosystem where natural laws and
principles can and, more importantly, are to be observed [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>In this regard, especially important becomes the nature of ecological communicative contact that
can be achieved precisely by using effective communication maxims [ibid.]. Such a shift towards the
analysis of the language in its own environment seems to be the revival of the initial research strand in
ecolinguistics when Einar Haugen was studying the correlation of different languages within the mind
of a bilingual person. Also, it demonstrates the cyclical nature of scientific investigation signifying
that ecolinguistics is a dynamic and developing linguistic discipline.</p>
      <p>The ecological focus of communication and learning is impossible without taking into account its
material basis – the neurophysiological characteristics of a human as a biological species. The
implementation of the ecological (harmonizing) approach to the communication problems also means
a need for humanists and linguists to work with scientists such as biologists and ecologists [20]. In our
study, we use the achievements of neurophysiologists who suggest that motion is one of the factors of
a person’s well-being, their motivation, activity, and happiness – respectively, harmony.</p>
      <p>Many learning activities (especially in online classes during the pandemic) are now carried out
sitting with just little movement or totally still. On the one hand, this leads to numerous painful
consequences for a person's health in the long-term perspective; on the other hand, it provokes the
feeling of monotony, lack of concentration right away, which causes an early loss of motivation to
study. These effects make movement a necessary part of the learning process.</p>
      <p>In addition to other known motivation-enhancing teaching tools, the movement activities create a
physiological balance, activate blood circulation, increase blood oxygen, stimulate thinking activities
through the production of the BDNF protein (brain-derived neurotrophic factor), and bring
competition into play 21, 22.</p>
      <p>Movement in the broadest sense not only trains the body but also develops the adaptability and
thus the plasticity of the brain 23. Numerous experiments on animals 24, 25 have shown that
physical activity significantly increases the release of the neurotransmitters (messenger substances)
serotonin (happiness hormone), dopamine (reward hormone), and noradrenalin (stress hormone).
Thus, the brain processes dependent on the transmitters are positively influenced. These study results
can also be transferred to humans. The described positive effects of physical activity on various
neurobiological processes in the brain make it clear how important regular body exercise is for
emotional processes, memory, and learning performance 26, 27, 28.</p>
      <p>The sixth observation, according to [29, 30], is of paramount importance, since “…the needs and
desires of today’s students tend to be more pleased with the use of technology because they have
become part of the digital generation…so…the role of educators to update technology should be
pursued as seriously as possible…” [30]. This statement calls for realization of the ‘generation gap’
pointed out by a number of authors [29, 30, 31] as a result of communication among representatives
of the following groups of people:
 The Baby Boom generation (born 1946-1964);
 Generation X (born 1965-1980);
 Generation Y (born 1981-1999);
 Generation Z (born after 2000).</p>
      <p>It goes without saying that there is a substantial gap in different generations’ skills of handling
upto-date digital tools, so that the further the distance between the generation of the teacher and their
students, the bigger the gap in their ability to skillfully operate the modern technological tools. For
example, the Baby Boom generation would have to take much more effort in mastering online
platforms than, say, even generation Y.</p>
      <p>However, there are other important factors to be taken into account in predicting how big the gap
might be. Among them is the motivation of the older generation, their values to stay in the job, and
the environment they are working in, which may be either supportive of their strive to master new
technologies and competitive, or suppressive. Another factor is the kind of environment they are
working in.</p>
      <p>The motivation may stem from the institution authorities and the equipment available in the
working place, either at work or at home. The environment is made up of the country’s development
and the individual’s own experience and access to the up-dated tools. Thus, the generation gap might
shrink with the favourable factors for overcoming the teacher’s lack of necessary skills of
digitallymediated performance: namely, positive orientation and requirements of the authorities, the
availability of the equipment, the individual’s personal environment and the teacher’s motivation.</p>
      <p>In Lancaster and Stillman’s view, it is the Y and Z generations that are characterized by specific
learning styles, namely, learning from experimentation, preferring visual learning, preference of team
work, multitasking and educational fun [30]. From this study it is obvious that students representing
generations Y and Z, require the same or higher mastership of computer proficiency from their
educators, as well as interactivity and fun games. These requirements found complete confirmation in
the students’ survey described later on.</p>
      <p>Furthermore, communication between teachers and students can be extended beyond online classes
in the written form which involves other digital technologies (email, chat-rooms, text messaging,
telephoning, etc.).Each of the types mentioned makes communication more complete and efficient:
“What I hear, I forget; what I see, I remember; what I do, I know” [32].</p>
      <p>From what we have mentioned above, communication among students, or peer communication,
belongs to an environment completely different from the adult world with different values, both
online and the real world. No wonder that the researchers of adolescent values claim that “…for
today’s youth, media technologies are an important social variable and that physical and virtual
worlds are psychologically connected; consequently, the virtual world serves as a playing ground for
developmental issues from the physical world…” [33].</p>
      <p>Even though online communication levels up a number of differences, they persist in the
background of any form, oral or written, and cannot be ignored if educators aim at efficient
teacherstudent communication. The generation gaps (mostly between Baby Boom /X and Y/2000
generations) are to a great extent different in placing importance on intrinsic values, such as
Achievement, Altruism, and Autonomy by the youth that comes in contrast with Comfort and Status
values for senior people [29].</p>
      <p>This conflict of values among representatives of different generations reflects the impact of age on
the participants’ skills and abilities in using digital tools as well. In order to adjust to the challenges of
the digital era, “…the role of educators to update technology should be pursued as seriously as
possible” [30]. Moreover, this is the responsibility of the academic community to lead in this pursuit
of using updated technology and include in Foreign Language programmes to achieve the desired
results in students’ mastering effective foreign language communication. The efforts taken to this
effect are presented here in the form of new educational digital platforms later on.</p>
      <p>It is quite evident that the teaching process may either enforce or disrupt the principles of
effectiveness, and in this way serve the starting point in analyzing what exactly is needed for effective
communication in the real world (even though communication simulation online is a ‘playground’
for generations Y and Z).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Materials and Methods</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>3.1. Research Design</title>
      <p>The methodological basis of the study is formed by three groups of theories – the theory of
communication, the theories of linguistic ecology, and the basic provisions of neurophysiology.</p>
      <p>The design used for this research study is a mixed method approach based on modeling a
communicative environment with the help of digital tools combined with communication simulating
spaces providing close-to-life communicative environments. The survey results contain qualitative
data in form of CSS toolkit and quantitative data obtained from 2 questionnaires (students’ and
teachers’ ones) of a survey carried out in two stages.
3.2.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>The Context of The Study</title>
      <p>The scientific approach in [29] emphasizes the need in foreign language effective communication
learning for methods in the form of:
 observing (watching multimedia pieces in the practices described below);
 questioning (or problem-solving) advisable to be used as much on the part of the students as
the teachers themselves;
 reasoning (not so frequent in our practices but can be substituted by online after-presentation
discussion);
 experimenting (the study of the material can be completed by home assignment of writing an
essay on the basis of active vocabulary);
 networking (creating special chat-groups for out-of-class teacher-student communication).</p>
      <p>
        Here, we stand by the simplified definition of effective communication as “…the process of
exchanging ideas, thoughts, opinions, knowledge, and data so that the message is received and
understood with clarity and purpose. When we communicate effectively, both the sender and receiver
feel satisfied” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>So far, we have outlined the possible online communication environments of online classes and
beyond. No less important is mentioning the two major formats of communication, verbal and
nonverbal. The importance of the latter, according to Albert Mehrabian [34], communication is 55 percent
non-verbal, 38 percent vocal (tone and inflection), and 7 percent words. Despite the fact that modern
scientists dispute these figures [35], everyone agrees that the share of non-verbal communication is
high, and its factor should be taken into account. As the authors in [36] stress, “Communication can’t
be effective with one form excluding the other, that is, both forms of communication (verbal and
nonverbal) are extremely needed to carry out communication successfully… Very much often,
paralinguistic characteristics like stress, intonation, volume, passion, and rate convey different types
of meanings without involving words per se”.</p>
      <p>How to further develop skills in the non-verbal domain is also presented in the description of
innovative online teaching platform SpatialChat which proved that, surprisingly, effective non-verbal
communication found its place among the traditional studies of the verbal communication forms.</p>
      <p>In sum, the present study reduces the range of communication environments to two major areas of
teacher-student and peer communication multiplied none-the-less by oral (presentational) and
written forms and verbal vs. non-verbal communication, each of them possessing their own specificity
in teaching effectiveness. In addition, the areas mentioned should also be studied from two other
perspectives: teaching effective communication in a particular foreign language (either English or
German in our case) and improving communication between educators and learners, as well as among
the peers themselves. The former involves rules and patterns which are tangible, while the latter to a
great extent is based on psychology and human relationships which are intangible. And these new
challenges unavoidably “…refocus our scholarship from the devices to the human-based processes
being explored.” [37].</p>
      <p>
        One of such intangible patterns is the ecology of communication. We hold that communication is
ecological, that is harmonious, when it bears no harm or malice to its participants. Deriving from this,
one can observe strict connection between the state of homeostasis in the organisms united in an
ecosystem (and we consider communicators to be such ones in the whole environment of
communication) and harmonious outcome of effective communication when all the goals of the
communicative interaction are reached via enriching the interlocutors, not depriving them of positive
nature of communication itself. This contention is supported by the aforementioned thesis that both
interlocutors find communication to be a pleasant experience [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Thus, in this paper, we will adhere to ecological communicative paradigm of analysis which
stipulates usage of the following ecolinguistics method emerging from it:</p>
      <p>To determine whether the communication is effective, one needs to process the utterance through a
sieve of ecology which operates based upon the mechanism of logical implication and can be
pronounced the following way: ‘Should an utterance adhere to all the 7Cs, then it is ecological, id est,
it allows for effective communication’. In a formalized way, this operation can be described using
such a formula:</p>
      <p>If U = 7Cs then U= UEco = UEcoEff, where
If/then are logical operators of implication,
A is an utterance,
Eco signifies the feature of the utterance, its being ecological,
Eff marks that the utterance is effective.</p>
      <p>Nonetheless, the ecology of an utterance, according to our viewpoint, is merely its feature, not the
default mode. It can be easily explained by taking into account the fact that sometimes blunt speaking,
which can have a lower level of courtesy or lack it at all, still preserves its effectiveness. However, if
we speak of the academic communicative environment, then the ecology of an utterance conditions its
effectiveness by default for correctness, and politeness of the academic speech is inherent in this
functional style. In short, the ecology of communication correlates with the effectiveness of
communication on a meronymic basis.</p>
      <p>Still, as we know that communication is simultaneously happening in different ways (various
modes), it is our strong belief that non-verbal mode of communication, that is primarily connected
with movement, can also be part and parcel of its ecology provided we focus on the very pragmatic
feature of effectiveness – the message can be clearly understood and reproduced since memory
catches it easily and quickly.</p>
      <p>The effects of movement on learning performance initiated the emergence of TPR technique in the
1960s. TPR stands for Total Physical Response, and it was developed by James Asher and his
adherents [38]. His basic idea is that new words and phrases are better remembered if new knowledge
is reinforced with actions. The practice of TPR outlined the classes of language units that can be
successfully learned with the help of this technique: verbs (mainly denoting movement), adverbs and
adjectives, tenses (past/present/future, simple and continuous aspects), classroom routine phrases,
imperatives (instruction routines). Also storytelling and reading, songs and chants can be practiced.
Despite sustainable positive results, TPR technique demonstrates a number of disadvantages and
restrictions while using it: not all necessary words and structures can be transferred through
movements (especially abstract ones), the implementation takes a lot of time in the classroom with
much space needed; besides, the technique can provoke a negative psychological response by adult
learners.</p>
      <p>The advantages of TPR can be used even under pandemic and state of war in terms of online
classes (E-learning). To answer the question how it is possible to reach motion brain centers without
moving we must appeal to the term mirror neurons, first mentioned by neuropsychologist Giacomo
Rizzolatti in 1992. His observations confirmed by the following experiments demonstrate paradox
ability of human brain: certain cells in the motor and premotor cortex discharge not only when
performing an action, but also when one only observes the same movement in others [39]. This
function of mirror neurons makes it possible to simulate movement online by watching/ listening
video/ audio files during online classes. Using elements of virtual reality constructed on co-working
online platforms makes it possible to involve the participants deeper and more impersonally into
action.</p>
      <p>To overcome the disadvantages of TPR the teacher can use elements of edutainment (education
plus entertainment). This approach implicates a wider range of educational elements you can learn
with, and more brain structure involved, first of all those responsible for hedonistic effects.</p>
      <p>That reduces the problem of low motivation and static during E-learning. So, edutainment as a
modern method of the educational process, focused on the entertainment component, helps the
students independently satisfy their needs in learning without losing interest in the subject [40]. It has
been systematically implemented at the National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic
Institute” since 2020 with the start of blended learning. While implementing the method and
conducting the research on its effectiveness, we followed such principles as: variability of means,
psychological comfort, and the principle of systematicity.
3.3.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>The Material of the Study</title>
      <p>The edutainment activities during the classes included the use of multimedia boards, audio and
video files in the original language, numerous presentations and quests made up for deeper immersion
in the material, division into session rooms, which enabled students to freely perform creative tasks.
The most interesting for the students was the processing of the material with the involvement of
interactive online platforms. The conducted experiments outlined the 5 most effective platforms for
the edutainment principle, which serve to practice the material when learning a foreign language:
LearningApps, Quizizz, Padlet, Quizlet and ThingLink [41], but its number constantly grows and is
enhanced by newly emerged platforms. The material of the study was learning activities on these and
other educational platforms like Virtual Speech, Small Talk, Explain Everything, Word Wall etc.
3.4.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>The Sample of The Study</title>
      <p>All the samples (total 77) belong to the EFL-community at the National Technical University
‘Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute’ and form two focus groups: English major students and English
teachers at the Department of Business English and Translation. There were 59 1st-5th year students
(bachelor and master level, English as the first foreign language and German as the second foreign
language), aged17-22, and 18 teachers, aged 24-69 with 2-45 years of work experience. All the
teachers have more than 2 years of online teaching experience, and all students have more than one
year of E-learning experience.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Research Instruments</title>
      <p>The instruments of the research are both modeling and evaluative. The methodic-didactic potential
of the online educational digital tools like Quizlet, Quizzizz, LearningApps, Kahoot etc. was used to
construct exercises or tasks integrated into CSS aiming at the development of the students’
communicative skills. The input data for constructional steps is obtained from the students’ and
teachers’ interviews before using modeled CSS (September 2022) in the first part of the research. The
second part of the survey was conducted after CSS classes during the winter semester 2022/2023
(January 2023) to prove the effectiveness of the method.</p>
      <p>Both interviews were conducted asynchronously via Google Forms. All the data are used with the
permission of the participants. All the interviews were taken by the authors of the research.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>4. Experiment</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>4.1. Initial data for the experiment</title>
      <p>
        With the total change of a learning format from traditional via blended (traditional and online
combined) to complete digitally-mediated learning, there appeared a new image of communication
channels (hearing, sight and touch [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]. Although the roles of listening and visual image have retained
their paramount importance, non-verbal communication in the form of spatial cues has disappeared.
The lack of the spatial cues, however, immediately launched the search for its replacement online on
the part of educators and their technical counterparts alike, and finally resulted in communication
simulating spaces (CSS) like SpatialChat, Wonder.Me, HyHyve, which have already been widely
used in the project under discussion [45, 46, 47].
      </p>
      <p>To receive the initial input data, there was conducted the first stage of the survey when both
educators and learners were offered to answer multiple choice questions altogether with writing their
own opinion. As has been stated above, there were 59 students (ranging from freshmen to seniors of
the 5th year of study) majoring in English and German as well as 18 professional educators who
specialize in teaching these languages, translation, and interpretation, and other language- or
arearelated disciplines. It is notable that many educators hold PhD in philology or are working as senior
lecturers. For readers’ convenience, we are attaching the full list of questions below (see Table 1).
Here, we will dwell upon the most prominent results of the initial questionnaire that are closely
connected with further parts of the paper as well as the problem under scrutiny.</p>
      <p>Thus, the majority of educators rendered by figure of 50% have stated that provided they had the
opportunity to choose the teaching mode, they would choose blended classes which combine online
and offline educational activities. If it goes down further, 27.8% voted in favor of online classes only
with 22.2% of those for whom it does not matter. The last figure is noteworthy, for it shows a
moderate adaptivity level of educators which is of paramount importance since one of the key
competences selected for survival in a rapidly-changing world is the ability to put up with fluctuating
circumstances.</p>
      <p>Talking about students’ answers, one can see that when answering question o, the main aim of
foreign language acquisition, 74.6% of those asked said it is merely interesting, a little bit smaller
number responded that it could help them succeed in life. Only 5.1% stated they have to do it. Should
we judge by the numbers, it becomes crystal clear that modern youngsters are highly motivated to
reach success in life, and foreign languages are to help them in this matter. They connect the concept
of SUCCESS with the concept of FOREIGN LANGUAGE ACQUISTION.</p>
      <p>However, going deeper into the analysis of the learners’ answers, we encountered a problem which
later we tried to solve: motivation for communication. Although 45.8% of students say that online
classes motivate them to communicate, 44.1% stated they are not sure – the gap between definite
‘yes’ and vague ‘no’ is very narrow meaning there can be a fragile balance, and any of the opposite
parties can take the majority at any moment. To give the full picture, only 8.5% said they are
definitely not motivated. This situation is very close to elections: these 44.1% are ‘swing states’ in the
run for superiority.</p>
      <p>Generally speaking, the aforementioned challenge has provided us with one of the starting points
of the second stage of our experiment that is described in-depth in a further section of this paper.</p>
      <sec id="sec-10-1">
        <title>Students’ Survey Teachers’ Survey</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-2">
        <title>How long do you experience online classes in foreign languages?</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-3">
        <title>What is the aim of your studying foreign languages at the university?</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-4">
        <title>Can you say that the current online communication under E-learning is harmonious*?</title>
        <p>*Harmonious means ecological that is full, adequate, and effective</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-5">
        <title>Can you say that online communication under E-learning can still prepare for real life conversation?</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-6">
        <title>Do the current online classes at the university How would you rate the following characteristics</title>
        <p>motivate you enough to communicate? of students' communication skills at the
beginning of the current academic year? (5
superior, 4 - good, 3 - satisfactory, 2 - low pass, 1</p>
        <p>- low failure) *
*repeated after the winter semester</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-7">
        <title>How would you describe your experience with online platforms?</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-8">
        <title>How much time does communicative interactivity among the students during an average class take?</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-9">
        <title>How much time does communicative Which online platforms do you find more interactivity between the teacher and the efficient for communication? students during an average class take?</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-10">
        <title>Are you bored during an ordinary class under</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-11">
        <title>E-learning?</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-12">
        <title>What kind of classes would be preferable for you if you would be able to choose at the moment?</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-13">
        <title>What aspects of the classes in a foreign What could level up the motivation of the language would you change to achieve better students to communicate in foreign languages? results for improving your communication skills?</title>
        <p>4.2.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>Digital tools involved in the experiment</title>
      <p>
        The application of the results of the research on the effectiveness of interactive platforms [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref3">1, 3, 41</xref>
        ]
in blended learning under the pandemic/ E-learning under the state of war allowed us to use these
tools to improve the communicative competence in its aspects taken separately. The most effective
online tools applied to the 7 C’s are as follows in Table 2:
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-11-1">
        <title>Correctness</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-11-2">
        <title>Coherence</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-11-3">
        <title>Completeness</title>
        <p>Courtesy
following the rules of the
language norms
logical flow of speech, public
speaking topics
giving all the information
needed, high level of detail
following the rules of the social
interaction</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-11-4">
        <title>Testing tools (Quizzizz, Kahoot,</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-11-5">
        <title>LearningApps, Word Wall)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-11-6">
        <title>Virtual Speech App, Small Talk App</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-11-7">
        <title>ThingLink, virtual whiteboards</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-11-8">
        <title>Avatar platforms (ReadyPlayer.Me etc)</title>
        <p>The latter point of courtesy must be emphasized because of the specifics of the mentioned tool.
Creating avatars that visually replace participants in virtual communication helps to overcome the
language barrier, relieve stiffness in communication, but it can not solve the problem of politeness
holistically. The development of this skill is not possible with the help of a single tool, apart from
other skills, and most importantly, in isolation from the communicative context.</p>
        <p>The novelty of our approach lies in the integration of well-known tools into simulators of the
communicative environment, represented in the study by three CSS platforms: SpatialChat,
Wonder.Me, HyHyve (see below)
4.3.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-12">
      <title>Communication Simulating Spaces</title>
      <p>Online workspaces built on the principle of dynamic circles with close to life backgrounds are a
relatively new phenomenon becoming popular since the pandemic in early 2020. The first platform of
the kind acknowledged worldwide and used by remote teams to get synchronous work done
anywhere, anytime is SpatialChat (2020, Limassol, Cyprus), followed by Wonder.Me (2020, Berlin),
HyHyve (2021, Berlin) with similar functions and interface. The creators of the SpatialChat suggest
that their innovation helps to overcome the problems of static one-to-one or one-to-all communication
offered by other communication platforms like Zoom, Skype and others [42]. A distinctive feature of
the service is that the volume of the sound you hear depends on the distance of your avatar from its
source, such as a posted video or the avatar of a speaking user (proximity sensors automatically adjust
volume levels).</p>
      <p>The other advantages include customized settings including changeable 3D backgrounds,
expressive and personalized avatars (a feature developed by SpatialChat in cooperation with the
gaming platform ReadyPlayer.Me), messaging and presentations, adding information to profiles,
embedding static images and gifs, videos, and even separate browser tabs into a common space.</p>
      <p>In SpatialChat for educational purposes the teacher can create a virtual space where invited
students navigate using their avatars in a themed space with different areas or ‘rooms’ set up for
exercises, quizzes, quests or discussions, as well as open zones for more free-flowing interaction, so
as the participants move their avatar icons around and leave/join conversations to focus on the chat
needed at the moment. The teacher can arrange a lexical or grammatical, country-study oriented quest
so that in each room a mini-test or a riddle awaits the participants, and the correct answer is the
password to enter the next zone. SpatialChat is very convenient for online speeches with reports and
presentations. The speaker can go up to the virtual stage, display an image of his screen for those
present and demonstrate any media content It is possible to arrange performances of the student
theater in it, especially using the function of customizing avatars which can become the nearest
objective for the departmental out-of-class activities with the still functioning Theater of English
miniatures at the Department of Business Foreign Languages and Translation.</p>
      <p>A normal SpatialChat séance includes up to 50 participants which is the company’s policy: the
developers claim, handling even 50 simultaneous video connections (and video circles moving) is a
technology challenge (“hard to decode so many video streams by average CPUs or handle video data
streaming on non-5GHz WiFi connections” [42]). Nevertheless, newer SpatialChat’s counterparts
offer their solutions for up to 100 in HyHyve or even 500 participants in Wonder.Me.</p>
      <p>Still, on smartphones and tablets, CSS features are significantly limited. So, from a mobile device
the user will not be able to watch videos, attach media files and share the screen.</p>
      <p>Despite the cons CSS offer close to a real-life experience – they recreate “the feeling of being in a
room, milling about and choosing who you’d like to talk to, and for how long. It enables spontaneous
flow and is much less formal and controlling than other platforms” [43].
4.4.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-13">
      <title>Modeling effective communication training in CSS</title>
      <p>The experimentally proven model of communication skills training (CSS based toolkit) includes
edutainment exercises that are effectively used in offline learning and cannot be implemented on
static online platforms (or can be implemented with some restrictions). The CSS tools can be divided
into 3 groups according to the stage of the class:</p>
      <p>CSS on the warming up stage
“Ice Breaker Bingo”. For a limited period of time students must interview the maximum number
of interlocutors and write down the players’ reaction to the statements. In the CSS it is important for
participants to think over the trajectory of avatars in order to interview the maximum number of
participants in a limited time without interfering with the communication of other pairs and groups,
formulating the question as briefly and clearly as possible.</p>
      <p>“Letter Salad“. Each team member is assigned a letter of the alphabet by renaming the
participant's avatar or via a built-in chat. The participants must make words from this set of letters
either on a given topic (active vocabulary training) or as many words as possible (spelling training).</p>
      <sec id="sec-13-1">
        <title>Reproductive stage</title>
        <p>“Pick Up Words”. The basis of the exercise is a set of language units, active lexical or
grammatical phenomena that are included in the media text (audio or video) chosen by the teacher.
When playing the media file, students must identify the words they heard with those written on the
cards. In the online version of CSS, they must move their avatar to the desired card first.</p>
        <p>“Fly Swatting” is another test for checking active units. In the online version of CSS, the answer is
selected by rapidly moving the avatar towards the answer suggested to be correct (“hitting” it with a
“fly swatter”).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-13-2">
        <title>CSS on the productive stage</title>
        <p>The exercises mentioned above are primarily receptive in their nature, and training the
communication skills for reproduction. However, more complex, multi-stage communicative actions
are also possible in CSS.</p>
        <p>“Speed dating” means conducting a dialogue on a given topic in a given period of time with
different interlocutors. To do this, the participants (in the online version – their avatars) form 2 circles
– an internal motionless and an external, moving clockwise. After the first set period of time, the outer
circle moves and the participants get a new interlocutor. “Four Corners” can act as a tool for forming
teams (groups of interest), as well as independent activity in the lesson. The teacher offers a
discussion question and 4 possible answers. Each answer has its own corner of the offline room or its
own subspace of the virtual platform. Adherents of one or another point of view gather in “their”
corner and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of their position, in order to defend it later in a
plenary discussion or in the jigsaw groups (see below).</p>
        <p>The integrative technique of “Jigsaw groups” develops a set of reading and/or listening, speaking,
summarizing skills. At the initial stage of this activity, primary groups (jigsaw groups) are formed,
their number and the number of their participants are determined by the size of the academic group,
but the number of participants must be equal. The groups get a text to read or listen to, divided into
segments according to the number of participants. After working on their segment of the text,
“experts” on the same segment of the text from different groups are gathered in temporary expert
groups, where they discuss the learned information. At the third stage, the experts return to their
jigsaw groups and present their part of the information. The task of the jigsaw group is to restore the
complete picture of the original text. Control of understanding of the entire text is carried out using a
quiz or test.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-14">
      <title>5. Results</title>
      <p>To prove the effectiveness of the CSS based toolkit, there was the second stage of the surveys
featuring transformed versions of students’ and teachers’ questionnaires among both groups of
participants (students and teachers). The students’ after-questionnaire contained items 3-5, 8 from the
before-questionnaire plus an additional item: “How do you rate your digital competence after winter
semester 2022/2023?” The teachers’ after-questionnaire contained a transformed version of item 4
“How would you rate the following characteristics of students' communication skills after the winter
semester of the current academic year? (5 - superior, 4 - good, 3 - satisfactory, 2 - low pass, 1 - low
failure)”.</p>
      <p>In brief, most educators – 66.7% – stated that online communication under e-learning can still
prepare for real-life conversation with 27.8% denying it. If we talk about whether the online
communication under e-learning is harmonious, 67.8% of students and 88.9% of lecturers claim it is;
however, a third of both educators and learners add that it might be better leaving room for
improvements to follow. At the same time, the absolute majority of teachers (94.4%) say their
experience of using online platforms is positive with the others dubbing it as neutral, and nobody (!)
as negative. Nonetheless, 71.2% of learners state they feel bored during an ordinary online class. We
consider this figure to be a warning signal for us as teachers because being interested in the very
process of learning is one of the key triggers of aspiration for knowledge.</p>
      <p>Also, there was a question with no limitations for the answers: students were supposed to write
themselves what their contention is. Basically, when looking through students’ response on how they
see the process of improvement of their communicative skills, one can note five main strands of their
opinion: a) they are completely okay with education they receive and see no need in alterations; b)
students say they would like to have classes with native speakers; c) they would like to have more
modern textbooks because they think their input is obsolete; d) learners want more interactive
authentic input such as films, books, and songs; e) students merely want more speaking practice that
involves slang and everyday language, not only its literary standard.</p>
      <p>Educators, when asked what techniques they use to boost students’ motivation during online
classes, share different ideas; however, in some points they are literally unanimous: regular training
and challenging tasks. On a par, they name the following: usage of multimedia tools, additional tasks
like home reading or film watching, showing career prospects rooting from knowledge of foreign
language. In addition, amongst the very few but still existing are the following motivation techniques:
setting small goals, involving native speakers, fostering students’ own research, etc.</p>
      <p>Table 8 below shows how educators assessed their students’ communicative skills at the beginning
of winter semester before the application of CSS. As you can see, there is no indication of low failure
signifying that students still are able to communicate to this or that extent, if we consider their initial
proficiency. At the same time, the superior level is also a rare thing to encounter, with the majority
having ‘good’ or at least ‘satisfactory’ grades. Nonetheless, it is noteworthy that the correctness of
students’ communication is quite high, reaching 10 points of ‘good’ score making it the maximum.
However, there are skills that lacked proficiency at the beginning of the semester, namely – coherence
and completeness being evaluated as ‘satisfactory’.</p>
      <p>When compared to the aforementioned initial data to the result at the end of semester, one can note
a significant increase in all of the parameters as demonstrated in Figure 9. It is important that
students’ skills rose in the areas where their advanced proficiency (‘superior’ grade) was initially very
low: clearness, conciseness, and concreteness (cf. 1 ‘superior’ grade in Figure 8 in clearness vs. 8
‘superior’ grade in Figure 9 within the same skill). Coherence and correctness also enjoyed a
moderate boost. It is interesting that in after-the-term assessment ‘satisfactory’ grades nearly
disappeared, appearing occasionally in a very scarce number. ‘Low pass’ was almost reduced to zero
level as well. Overall, after the implementation of CSS into the process of teaching effective foreign
language communication the gap between advanced proficiency of 7Cs skills and ‘good’ level of their
usage narrowed (cf. e.g. Figure 8 clearness skill vs. the same skill in Figure 9).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-15">
      <title>6. Discussion</title>
      <p>The results of the CSS toolkit implementation during the English classes featured above show that
some typical difficulties emerging during E-learning can be overcome with the help of the offered
digital tools. First of all, the difficulties in communication in any language, but primarily in a foreign
one, arise at the stage of acquaintance in a new team, or after a long break in communication (for
students, for example, after holidays). For such cases in the practice of offline communication there
are icebreaker exercises designed to mediate the exchange of personal information between
communicants in a game form. The digital game “Ice Breaker Bingo” represents a field with personal
questions prepared in advance by the teacher taking into account the specifics of the audience (age,
level of knowledge, personal background).</p>
      <p>Icebreaker-type exercises develop the ability to plan communication, form the skills of courtesy
and clarity. Warm-up exercises such as “Letter Salad” provide a wide field of variation in the number
of participants and the skills developed with their help. These games develop the communicative
aspect of correctness, make it possible to transfer a passive vocabulary into an active one, and
contribute to forming the skills of teamwork and brainstorming. Reproductive exercises such as “Pick
Up Words” develop listening skills and the speed of perlocutionary reaction to a language message,
“Fly Swatting” trains the speed of the language reaction, creating a waking up effect due to active
movement or movement simulation.</p>
      <p>Productive activities like “Speed Dating” serve to train communicative formulas, promote the
conscious use of language variability, the development of soft skills of cooperativeness, and empathy
to individualize the approach to the interlocutor. “Four Corners” helps to maximize the sensitization
of the principle of cooperativeness in communication. The most complex activity of “Jigsaw Groups”
develops not only language skills, but also the general communicative ability to clearly and briefly
convey a piece of information. Also, students develop their soft skill of personal responsibility – each
of them is in his or her jigsaw group the only expert on his/her piece of information.</p>
      <p>
        When analyzing in a critical way the result of the survey, one can see that some points provide for
a wider discussion. For instance, it is the educators’ viewpoint that online communication training
prepares for real life conversation. Valuable indeed is the fact that it is the teachers’ viewpoint, and
there is a significant reason for it: it is quite obvious that educators are much older than their students,
and it means teachers possess a wider experience of real-life conversation in everyday routine for they
could practice it for a longer period of time (some of them – for almost all of their life). Thus, they
could compare the modern situation with something they used to experience before which is no longer
available for the youth. The enormous numbers from 67.8% to 88.2% of those who claim their
learning process is harmonious and they are satisfied with the usage of online platforms offered
denotes that the firm basis set by previous scientific investigations [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref3">1, 3</xref>
        ] is operating correctly and
shows a high level of resistance towards numerous challenging factors.
      </p>
      <p>In addition, even though the number of students who feel bored sometimes is rather high (71/2%)
when in a virtual classroom, the percentage of those who say it occurs often is incomparably low –
13.6%. This allocation is really meaningful because it is a big gap between ‘often’ and ‘sometimes’
both in the language itself (cf. grammar theme ‘Adverbs of frequency’) and in the consciousness of
the student. If we reframe it, learners are rather bored sometimes than often. Such a formulation
provides for a further logical conclusion: sometimes is not permanently; thus, most of the lesson time
the students are engaged and not distracted. This is another advantage to the approach applied and
tested.</p>
      <p>Surely, when asked about improvements, obviously everyone will say something because the
question itself contains a presupposition: if one needs to improve something, they are not content with
the current state of affairs. Naturally, there were numerous answers that partially coincide and
partially vary. Nonetheless, there was something quite peculiar about these responses that drew our
attention: amongst the most popular strands of students’ opinion there was the following one – ‘I am
okay with what is being done right now.’ We know that modern generation is far more demanding
than most of us used to be, for they are far more aware of their rights and opportunities. Still, they say
that they are satisfied and merely offer some variants of alterations to be made. This designates that
university lecturers did succeed in not only maintaining the level of education under martial law,
which cost them a great deal of efforts, but also in boosting it higher. They managed to adapt to the
new circumstances, and this is one of the most positive outcomes.</p>
      <p>If we talk about 7Cs skills, we can observe that the students’ proficiency level is rising, while the
number of those who are assessed as ‘low pass’ or ‘satisfactory' is decreasing dramatically leaving
room for changing for the better. This can be concluded by looking into the frequency of ‘superior’
and ‘good’ grades: good results can be easily turned into superior provided teachers keep on going.
Although the stability of the growing trend can seem a bit debatable, we are sure of the future growth,
for the frequency of failures is going down with success growing much faster.</p>
      <p>The majority of those who answered the questions about the platforms for E-learning and “boring
effect” of online classes recognized the advantages of CSS saying that the authors’ hypothesis about
high efficacy of CCS as an instrument that triggers students’ interest is right. When looking for
causeand-effect connection between the increase of interest and E-learning, we reckon this is significantly
conditioned by a boost in students’ media competence that has rocketed since 2019.</p>
      <p>Partially, it can be accounted for by the aforementioned typical feature of the new generation that
acquires practical skills of using digitized tools more quickly. In the world full of electronic media
used for gaming, exchanging messages, and so on, it is quite obvious that for the youth surrounded by
all of this digital matter at home and beyond the classroom – be it an offline regular classroom or a
virtual one – it would be easier to use the same technology in learning new material, foreign
languages, for instance. Thus, they will be involved in what all of us are aspiring after – lifelong
learning and sustainable education.</p>
      <p>As it can be observed from the diagrams shown below in Figure 10, in the year 2019, the media
competence slightly exceeded 2 points because, like any skill regardless of its character, media
competence takes time to master. It took one year to skyrocket up to 8.48 points in 2020; the
Covid19 pandemic contributed to it as well with those quarantine restrictions and first full online mode
worldwide ever.</p>
      <p>The year 2021 demonstrated another increase but a bit moderate one that can be explained easily
by general laws of education: when a person solidifies its basis in any area under scrutiny, he/she
becomes a professional. After that, they can continue professional development which might not lead
to a very big boost if compared to the initial, pre-basis level; however, it can happen provided the
subject or profession changes completely. Hopefully, CCS remained rather stable giving both
educators and learners time to adapt. Finally, as the war began, the dynamics did not stop; on the
contrary, it developed and reached almost half a point during the wartime. The war did not manage to
ruin the firm and resistant educational environment. Of course, it is thanks to educators’
professionalism and students’ eagerness to learn because education is a bilateral process where only
the cooperation between teachers and students can show the highest result.</p>
      <p>Dynamics of student's media competence 2019-2022
8,48
9,1</p>
      <p>9,46</p>
      <p>Self estimated level of media competence</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-16">
      <title>7. Conclusions</title>
      <p>Given the scope of attention to the results of the surveys conducted among teachers and students
involved in the introduction of the new digital products online, the preliminary observations are as
follows:
1. The majority of both students’ and teachers’ answers stress the improvement of effective
communication skills at the end of the experiment (1 semester – 85%)
2. The teachers’ surveys emphasized their preference of blended to overall to acomplete online
forms (80%).
3. The analysis of particular students’ answers to the question ‘interesting – boring” revealed
that the percentage of students’ negative attitude (;being bored’,’bored sometimes’, or, more
interestingly, ‘I am bored but I have to learn’) are strongly connected to their typical classroom
face-to-face communication: too shy to speak up, frightened to make mistakes, ‘leave me alone’
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
2,24
2019
2020
2021
2022
types, indifferent to any kind of activities or those whose performance used to be unsatisfactory
due to low foreign language proficiency and inactive stand in life.
4. On the other hand, all those who performed brilliantly,or were active learners in face-to-face
or blended learning, overwhelmingly revealed strong positive attitudes (100%) emphasizing
‘harmony’, lack of boredom’, excitement/fun’ features which strongly reflect their psychological
behavior in real life.
5. This fact calls for further research of effective communication as part of learners’
relationships (soft skills) and generation gap values (reflecting their motivation and eagerness to
become achievers as compared to their senior counterparts’ in communication online (teachers)
whose aims online are different of being strong leaders, active, armed with effective
communication skills (teachers) or’ confident-unconfident’, ‘interested – uninterested, bored,
‘leave me alone’ type, or just low –rate learner who may well turn into a an active learner with
high prospects of command under the teacher’s guidance.
6. It is obvious, though, that provided the teacher is well equipped with the soft skills of
differential approach to all types of students’ behavior, he/she can adopt the appropriate attitude to
solving the above-mentioned problems.
7. This is a long-range objective of the study under question still unsolved including generation
gap values and their differences, ice-breaking the former typical students’ behavior in class (the
relationship issue), and the search for innovative technologies to be used online in order to ma ke a
breakthrough in the students’ attitude to learning, whereas most of the students are fast learners of
new digital tools and challenging them would play the trick.</p>
      <p>To summarize, effective online communication has been studied in the two major areas of the
actual teacher-student and peer communication, with concentration placed on the contents of the
online courses in foreign languages with rules and recommendation of conveying the right tone, the
right vocabulary selection, the knowledge of the proper sentence structure and stylistic cues.
Nonetheless, the aims of improving communication in the two areas are different. Communication
among teachers and students may serve a practical pattern by itself and is focused to a greater extent
on effective human relationship or interpersonal relationship among the peers themselves online in
challenging times, whereas teaching foreign language communication involves other tools beside
choosing the right tone: sentence structure, grammar pragmatics, vocabulary choice, bits of
crosscultural knowledge and indispensable fundamentals of country-study in learning foreign languages.
Thus, intelligent computing systems are incorporated in interpersonal communication to achieve and
teach effectiveness in online communication to assist students in the most challenging time of all, the
war-time, in particular.</p>
      <p>When drafting perspectives for the future scientific investigations, we are of the opinion that
determination of media competence level of teachers may be of great interest for it will provide for
the opportunity to compare the results of educators and learners because lecturers are to have more
indepth knowledge in order to teach others.</p>
      <p>Also, more attention ought to be paid to the ecology of communication amongst teachers and
students with special attention being paid to the process of ecological communicative competence
formation – the sixth ‘C’ in Grice’s taxonomy called ‘courtesy’ – within the framework of different
learning modes. Still, there remains one point that gives a starting point for involvement of all the
aforementioned ideas – the dialogue of generations and generation gap. It is natural that the time of
peer communication during the lesson should be expanded. However, the question n whether leveling
the time spent on teacher-student vs. student-student, or even alteration to the lesson structure when a
teacher speaks less leaving more time for students’ communication, will be more efficient, remains a
very promising issue for further research.</p>
      <p>Another perspective study is the assessment of teachers’ media competence and their pace of
mastering new technologies; it would unavoidably involve the study of the generation gap in terms of
their differences of values and in digital skills.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-17">
      <title>8. References</title>
      <p>[20] W. Zhou, Ecolinguistics: A half-century overview, Journal of World Languages, 7.3 (2021):
461–486. URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0022.
[21] J.D. Omura, D.R. Brown, L. C. McGuire, Ch. A. Taylor, J. E. Fulton, S. A. Carlson,
Crosssectional association between physical activity level and subjective cognitive decline among US
adults aged ≥45 years, 2015, Preventive Medicine, 141:106279 (2020). URL:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106279.
[22] M. M. H. van Swieten, R. Bogacz, Modeling the effects of motivation on choice and learning in
the basal ganglia, PLoS Computational Biology, 16.5 (2020): URL:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007465.
[23] M. Miranda, J. F. Morici, M.B. Zanoni, and P. Bekinschtein, Brain-derived neurotrophic factor: a
key molecule for memory in the healthy and the pathological brain, Front Cell Neurosci,
13(2019). doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00363.
[24] J. P. Wisor, Dopamine and Wakefulness: Pharmacology, Genetics, and Circuitry. Sleep-Wake
Neurobiology and Pharmacology. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology / H. P. Landolt,
D. J. Dijk (eds). Springer, Cham., 2018, Vol. 253. https://doi.org/10.1007/164_2018_95.
[25] E. Hasegawa, A. Miyasaka, K. Sakurai, Y. Cherasse, Y. Li, T. Sakurai, Rapid eye movement
sleep is initiated by basolateral amygdala dopamine signaling in mice, Science, 375.6584 (2022):
994–1000. doi: 10.1126/science.abl6618.
[26] B. F. Haverkamp, J. Oosterlaan, M. Königs, E. Hartman, Physical fitness, cognitive functioning
and academic achievement in healthy adolescents, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 57 (2021).</p>
      <p>URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102060.
[27] T. M. Wassenaar et al., The effect of a one-year vigorous physical activity intervention on
fitness, cognitive performance and mental health in young adolescents: the Fit to Study cluster
randomised controlled trial, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity,
18 (2021), 18. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01113-y.
[28] S. Belić Malinić, Growth mindset: neurotransmitters in the science of learning, K12 Digest.</p>
      <p>Balkan Special Edition, 2022, URL:
https://www.k12digest.com/growth-mindsetneurotransmitters-in-the-science-of-learning/.
[29] J.-I. C. Hansen and M. E. Leuty, Work values across generations, Journal of career assessment,
20.1 (2012): 34–52.
[30] D. Sudrajat, Effective English learning through scientific approach in the era of digital
technology, International Journal of Global Community, 2.3 (2019): 223–236.
[31] L. C. Lancaster, D. Stillman, When generations collide: who they are, why they clash, how to
solve the generation puzzle at work, Harper Collins New York, 2002.
[32] D. R. Prozesky, Communication and effective teaching, in: Teaching eye health, 13.35 (2000):
44–45. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1705977/.
[33] K. Subrahmanyam, P. Greenfield, Communicating online: adolescent relationships and the
media, The Future of Children, 18.1 (2008): 119–140. URL:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265435982_Communicating_Online_Adolescent_Relat
ionships_and_the_Media_Communicating_Online_Adolescent_Relationships_and_the_Media.
[34] A. Mehrabian, Silent messages: implicit communication of emotions and attitudes, Wadsworth</p>
      <p>Pub. Co., Belmont, Calif., 1981.
[35] J. Michail, Strong nonverbal skills matter now more than ever in this "New Normal", Forbes
Coaches Council, Council Post, 2020. URL:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachescouncil/2020/08/24/strong-nonverbal-skills-matternow-more-than-ever-in-this-new-normal/?sh=4a4a90625c61.
[36] M. K. Al-Alawneh, M. Sh. Hawamleh, D. A. H. Al-Jamal and G. S. Sasa, Communication skills
in practice, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18.6 (2019):
1–19. URL: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.6.1.
[37] M. Z. Yao, R. Ling, What is computer-mediated communication? An introduction to the special
issue, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25.1 (2020): 4–8. URL:
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz027.
[38] E. Walton, An introduction to Total Physical Response (and four activities to try), 2020. URL:
https://teacherblog.ef.com/total-physical-response-efl-classroom/.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Badan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Onishchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Zeniakin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Digital Technologies for Communication Simulation in Foreign Language Learning under Pandemic</article-title>
          , in: V.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lytvyn</surname>
          </string-name>
          et al (Eds.),
          <source>Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems</source>
          , volume
          <volume>3171</volume>
          <source>of COLINS-2022</source>
          , Gliwice, Poland,
          <year>2022</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1160</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1180</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Hrastinski</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>What Do We Mean by Blended Learning?</article-title>
          , in: TechTrends,
          <volume>63</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <fpage>564</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>569</lpage>
          . URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Badan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Onishchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Multimedia technologies in foreign language learning under pandemic</article-title>
          , in: V.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lytvyn</surname>
          </string-name>
          et al (Eds.),
          <source>Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems</source>
          , volume
          <volume>2870</volume>
          <source>of COLINS-2021</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Lviv</given-names>
            <surname>Ukraine</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>642</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>656</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H. P.</given-names>
            <surname>Grice</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Logic and Conversation, in: P. Cole and
          <string-name>
            <surname>J. L.</surname>
          </string-name>
          Morgan (Eds.),
          <source>Syntax and Semantics</source>
          , volume
          <volume>3</volume>
          of Speech Acts, Academic Press, New York,
          <year>1975</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>41</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>58</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Brown</surname>
          </string-name>
          , 7 Cs of Effective Communication with Example,
          <year>2022</year>
          . URL: https://www.invensislearning.com/blog/7
          <article-title>-rules-of-effective-communication-with-examples/.</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Schneider</surname>
          </string-name>
          , What Does Competence Mean?,
          <source>Psychology</source>
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <fpage>1938</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1958</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .4236/psych.
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <volume>1014125</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Schaffar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Competent uses of competence: on the difference between a value-judgment and empirical assessability</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy 7.2</source>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ): pp.
          <fpage>55</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>64</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1080/20020317.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>1958993</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Kiessling</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Fabry,
          <article-title>What is communicative competence and how can it be acquired?</article-title>
          ,
          <source>GMS J Med Educ. 38.3</source>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3205/zma001445.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.-U.</given-names>
            <surname>Sandal</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Detsiuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Kholiavko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Developing foreign language communicative competence of engineering students within university extracurricular activities</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Advanced Education 7</source>
          .14 (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>19</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>28</lpage>
          . URL: https://doi.org/10.20535/
          <fpage>2410</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>8286</lpage>
          .
          <fpage>192411</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. T. S.</given-names>
            <surname>Ahmed</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. V.</given-names>
            <surname>Pawar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Communicative competence in English as a foreign language: its meaning and the pedagogical considerations for its development</article-title>
          ,
          <source>The Creative Launcher 2.6</source>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ):
          <fpage>301</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>312</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Grossman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>The cost of poor communications</source>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          . URL: https://www.provokemedia.com/latest/article/the-cost
          <article-title>-of-poor-communications.</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Betts</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Lost in Translation: Importance of Effective Communication in Online Education,
          <source>Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration</source>
          ,
          <volume>7</volume>
          .2(
          <year>2009</year>
          ). URL: https://www.academia.edu/59407167/Lost_in_Translation_Importance_of_Effective_Communic ation_in_Online_Education.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Ober</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Contemporary Business Communication, 2nd ed.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Houghton</surname>
            <given-names>Mifflin</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Boston, MA,
          <year>1995</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N. D.</given-names>
            <surname>Dobransky</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. B.</given-names>
            <surname>Frymier</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Developing teacher‐student relationships through out of class communication</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Communication Quarterly</source>
          ,
          <volume>52</volume>
          .3(
          <year>2004</year>
          ):
          <fpage>211</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>223</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1080/01463370409370193.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Stibbe</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live by</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Routledge</surname>
          </string-name>
          , New York and London,
          <year>2021</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Zeniakin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Framing environment under pandemic: the anthropocentric perspective (a case study of British online media)</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Language &amp; Ecology</source>
          ,
          <year>2022</year>
          . URL: http://ecolinguisticsassociation.org/journal.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Penz</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Fill</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Ecolinguistics: History, today, and tomorrow,
          <source>Journal of World Languages, 8.2</source>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ):
          <fpage>232</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>253</lpage>
          . URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2022-0008.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. F.</given-names>
            <surname>Fill</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H. Penz (Eds.),
          <source>The Routledge handbook of Ecolinguistics</source>
          , Routledge, New York,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Samokhina</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Shpak</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Pasynok</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The ecology of communicative contact in Englishspeaking discourse</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Theory and Practice in Language Studies</source>
          ,
          <volume>12</volume>
          .1 (
          <year>2022</year>
          ):
          <fpage>170</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>177</lpage>
          . doi: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1201.21.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>