<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>COVID-19 Vaccine Stance and Symptom Reporting from Tweets using Contextual Embeddings</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Akshit Bansal</string-name>
          <email>abansal2_be19@thapar.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Rohit Jain</string-name>
          <email>rjain1_be19@thapar.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Jatin Bedi</string-name>
          <email>jatin.bedi@thapar.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Thapar Institute of Information and Technology</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Patiala, Punjab</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Determining sentiments of the public with regard to COVID-19 vaccines is crucial for nations to efifciently carry out vaccination drives and spread awareness. Hence, it is a field requiring accurate analysis and captures the interest of many researchers. Microblogs from social media websites such as Twitter sometimes contain colloquial expressions or terminology dificult to interpret making the task a challenging one. In this paper, we propose a method for multi-label text classification for the track of ”Information Retrieval from Microblogs during Disasters (IRMiDis)” presented by the ”Forum of Information Retrieval Evaluation” in 2022, related to vaccine sentiment among the public and reporting of someone experiencing COVID-19 symptoms. The following methodologies have been utilised: (i) Word2Vec and (ii) BERT, which uses contextual embedding rather than the fixed embedding used by conventional natural language models. For Task 1, the overall F1 score and Accuracy are 0.503 and 0.529, respectively, placing us fourth among all the teams, while for Task 2, they are 0.740 and 0.790, placing us second among all the teams who submitted their work. Our code is openly accessible through GitHub. 1.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Contextual Embeddings</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>We all have just faced a life-threatening world pandemic, and the only long-term remedy seems
to be through society-scale vaccination drives. Researchers from all over the world have created
a number of vaccines to combat the COVID-19 virus. Covaxin, Covishield, and Spikevax are
some of the well-known vaccines. Many people, however, are dubious about the use of vaccines
for a number of reasons, including the politicisation of the issue and the hasty development
of vaccines. There is reluctance among some people to get vaccinated since they believe that
vaccines have not been tested and there have not been enough trials to make sure they are safe.
To make the vaccination drive a success, it is imperative to understand the sentiments of the
public towards vaccines. This task can be accomplished using data from social networking
websites like Twitter because most of us use social media to communicate our views and opinions
in today’s world. In Task 1, data from social media and microblogging websites like Twitter
was obtained to understand people’s sentiments on vaccinations. The tweets are classified into
three categories: “ProVax”, “AntiVax”, “Neutral” based on their willingness to get vaccinated as
1https://github.com/RohitJain001/FIRE-Conference-BERT-Natural-Language-Preprocessing
analysed from their tweets.</p>
      <p>
        Using tweets gathered between February 2 and March 15, 2020, Abd-Alrazaq et. al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]
used topic modelling and sentiment analysis to identify the critical conversation subjects and
sentiments surrounding COVID-19. However, the use of colloquialisms, lack of structure and
having to analyse a large amount of data makes the task quite dificult for humans to accomplish.
As a result, the classification of tweets about vaccination is a challenging NLP task. Shamrat et
al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], used NLP to preprocess the data and then applied the KNN classification algorithm to
classify the tweets for three diferent vaccines into “Negative”, “Positive” and “Neutral”. Multiple
hashtags were utilised by Jia Xue et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] to collect data for experiments from Twitter. Then
the LDA machine learning algorithm was employed to do sentiment analysis on this data. Fear
was discovered to be an important characteristic in the discussion of COVID-19.
      </p>
      <p>In task 2 of the “Information Retrieval from Microblogs during Disasters” track, we specifically
explore if tweets that report someone experiencing COVID-19 symptoms can be automatically
identified. It focuses on classifying these tweets into four categories: “Primary Reporting”,”
Secondary Reporting”, “Third-party Reporting” and “Non-Reporting”. Our team has contributed
to the problem as part of the shared task efort by cleaning the tweets and trying various NLP
models including BERT and Word2Vec to classify the tweets.</p>
      <p>We have made the following contributions in context of the problem of the shared tasks:
• A transformer model i.e. BERTl which uses bidirectional word embeddings as opposed
to the fixed embeddings used by traditional Natural Language Processing models is
implemented to accurately identify the target tweets class.
• Word2Vec was also implemented as a part of the efort. The results showed that models
using contextual embeddings give relatively better results when compared to models
using fixed embeddings.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Related Work</title>
      <p>
        On the basis of tweets and facebook postings, several analyses of the public’s opinions on
the COVID-19 vaccination have been made. Samuel, et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] use Naive Bayes and Logistic
Regression techniques to classify tweets based on public sentiment insights from the COVID-19
dataset. They used a set of 24000 tweets based on news about COVID-19 vaccines in India
and the Naive Bayes model provided a classification accuracy of 91% while logistic regression
achieved an accuracy of 74%. The SAB-LSTM model developed and used by Kumar et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]
is an original bidirectional LSTM extension (SAB-LSTM)-based multi-class sentiment analysis
model.
      </p>
      <p>
        About 4.5 million tweets from the COVID-19 pandemic were the subject of a research in
Europe. Multilingual language embeddings were used to do sentiment analysis using neural
networks [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. To identify anti-vaccination tweets, the performance of Bidirectional long
shortterm memory networks with pre-trained GLoVe embeddings (Bi-LSTM) and the BERT model
were evaluated by Quyen et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ] in comparison to traditional machine learning techniques like
Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Naive Bayes. Their results show an accuracy of 91.6% and a
F1 score of 95.5% with BERT. Bi-LSTM model performance showed an accuracy of 89.8% and F1
score of 45.5% . Support Vector Machine and K Nearest Neighbour machine learning models
are employed by Adamu et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ] to categorise and assess the tweets into three categories:
“positive, “negative,” and “neutral”.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Dataset</title>
      <p>3.1. Task 1
The dataset provided contained 4392 tweets for training and 717 tweets for testing. Every tweet
in the dataset was labelled as one of the 3 stances related to vaccine sentiment expressed in the
tweet, as explained below:
1. AntiVax - The tweet expresses reluctance on the part of the user who tweeted it to get
vaccinated against COVID-19.
2. ProVax - The tweet endorsing or promoting the use of vaccinations.
3. Neutral - The tweet does not clearly reflect any opinion about vaccines or has nothing
to do with vaccines.
3.2. Task 2
The dataset provided contained 1574 tweets for training and 400 tweets for testing. Every tweet
in the dataset was labelled as one of four classes, which identifies reporting of COVID19, as
explained below:
1. Primary Reporting - The tweet’s submitter is outlining personal symptoms.
2. Secondary Reporting - The user is outlining the symptoms of a friend, family member,
neighbour, or recent acquaintance.
3. Third-party Reporting - A third party or famous person’s symptoms are being
referenced by the user.
4. Non-Reporting - The user is not claiming that anyone is displaying COVID-19 symptoms
and is instead utilising symptom-words in a diferent context. This collection of tweets
only ofers general information on COVID-19 symptoms; no specific people who may be
experiencing these symptoms are mentioned.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Methodology</title>
      <p>The tweets contain some colloquial expressions and terminology which might be dificult to
interpret; because of which, it could be challenging to determine the stance of a tweet. Hence,
an eficient method is to be established so these kinds of tasks can be accurately performed.</p>
      <p>We use a method which focuses on learning the semantic relationships between the sentence
tokens of tweets and map them with the given label. The work was seen as an extension of a
multi label phrase classification problem. Task 1 required the prediction of three labels linked
to public opinion on vaccines, and Task 2 required the prediction of four labels pertaining
to the reporting of someone who had COVID-19 symptoms. After analysis of data during
text Exploratory Data Analysis, the model’s accuracy was improved with efective stop-word
removal including removal of all special characters and website URLs.</p>
      <p>We used these preprocessed tweets to train specialised algorithms such as Word2vec and
BERT (as shown in Figure 1) to eficiently handle sentence classification. The process of a
deep learning-based transformers technique was applied. It helped in getting the correct
interpretation of the tweets and eficiently classifying them as one of the labels. For getting
optimised results from the BERT model, we tuned the hyperparameters including the max
length limit of the tokens, the training batch size parameter to determine how many tweets
were processed at once before the model was updated, the validation batch size and the learning
rate of the model. We chose the max length parameter to be 256, train and valid batch size to be
32 and the learning rate is 10-5. We chose BCE with Logits Loss in Pytorch, a combination of a
Sigmoid layer and BCE Loss into a single class which is numerically stable, as our loss function
and kept saving the checkpoint at each epoch if the accuracy improved. Using the best saved
model that we obtained after running the epochs, the tweets were classified into respective
labels.</p>
      <p>In Word2Vec methodology (as shown in Figure 1), initially a unique word dictionary was
created using the Keras Tokenizer() and the text_to_sequence() function was used to get a list
of lists where each value represent the index of that word in a unique word dictionary. Now as
every row has a diferent dimension, so the pad_sequences() method is used to add paddings
and generate an embedding matrix. The embedding matrix was fed to embedding layers in
Keras as weights. The input dimensions of the embedding layer is the total number of unique
words, and the output dimensions are the embedding vector dimensions. We received the word
embeddings as the output from the Keras embedding layer. Furthermore, the Long Short Term
Memory, Recurrent Neural Network Model was trained with the word embeddings and output</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Technique 1: BERT</title>
        <p>Input data
Pre Processing
[CLS] Don't trust vaccines [SEP] Not enough
trials [SEP]
Token Embeddings
Segment Embeddings
Position Embeddings</p>
        <p>E[CLS]</p>
        <p>EDon't</p>
        <p>Etrust Evaccines E[SEP] ENot Eenough
Etrials</p>
        <p>E[SEP]
EA
E0</p>
        <p>EA
E1</p>
        <p>EA
E2</p>
        <p>EA
E3</p>
        <p>EA
E4</p>
        <p>EB
E5</p>
        <p>EB
E6</p>
        <p>EB
E7</p>
        <p>EB
E8</p>
        <p>Transformer Blocks
Pretrained BERT base-uncased</p>
        <p>Output Label</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>Technique 2: Word2Vec</title>
        <p>Input Tweets
Keras Tokenizer()</p>
        <p>Preprocessing</p>
        <p>Unique Word Dictionary
text_to_sequence() &amp;
pad_sequences()
Keras Embedding Layer
Embedding Matrix
Word embeddings
Recurrent Neural Network</p>
        <p>LSTM
Output Label</p>
        <sec id="sec-4-2-1">
          <title>4.1. Data Preparation</title>
          <p>Before training the model, the data was thoroughly cleaned for the right text analysis and to
remove noise. For preparation, we used stop-word removal and tokenization. The words were
initially divided up into smaller parts called “tokens.” The text was changed to lowercase, the
urls were taken out, and words like “the”, “a”, “and”, “is”, and “will”—common stopwords in
English—were removed. This was done since none of these help to the goal of text classification.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-2-2">
          <title>4.2. Modelling</title>
          <p>
            BERT [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
            ] is a bidirectional language model that utilises the transformer architecture to learn
the contextual relationships between words. We make use of pre-trained models that have been
oficially released. BERT accepts either a single sentence or a text pair as input. The special
categorization token [CLS] comes first in each sequence, then WordPiece tokens for the first
text, a separator token [SEP], and (not mandatorily) WordPiece tokens for the second text. BERT
uses positional embeddings along with token embeddings to indicate where a token is in the
sequence. During training, BERT employs the Masked Language Modeling (MLM) and Next
Sentence Prediction (NSP) objectives.
          </p>
          <p>
            Word2Vec: Mikolov [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
            ] proposed the Word2vec word embedding technique in 2013 for word
expression, which takes into account the context and meaning of words in a text. It includes
continuous bag-of-words (CBOW) and skip-gram learning methods. It is employed in numerous
investigations, including emotion analysis, emotion categorization, and event detection because
word2vec’s cosine similarity of word vectors contains the meaning of words in the document
more than other word embedding approaches do. Convolution Neural Networks performs
exceptionally well for categorization in the field of natural language processing.
          </p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Experimentation and Results</title>
      <p>The test data was tested using the proposed methodology and multiple runs were submitted.
We experimented with various models including BERT and Word2Vec; and also tested for
varying number of epochs and learning rates for the BERT model. After a thorough analysis of
the test dataset processed by our proposed methods, the best results were obtained on using
BERT; with the optimal hyperparameters coming out to be 15 training epochs and a learning
rate of 10−5. As mentioned earlier, multiple runs were done using diferent learning rates and
number of epochs, but BERT outperformed Word2Vec every single time and generated optimal
results. BERT performs better as compared to Word2Vec since it uses a bidirectional transformer.
As compared to traditional language models like OpenAI GPT and Word2Vec which take the
previous ‘n’ tokens and predict the next token, BERT trains in such a manner which takes into
account both the previous and the next tokens making it deeply bidirectional. Word2Vec uses
ifxed word embeddings, not taking into account its neighbouring tokens, which hinders its
ability to capture the contextual understanding of the sentence.</p>
      <p>As mentioned in Table 3, training and validation accuracies for Task-1 turned out to be 0.986
and 0.942 respectively with BERT and in case of Word2Vec, training and validation accuracies
were 0.582 and 0.524 respectively. Similarly, as mentioned in Table 4, we achieved a training
accuracy of 0.991 and validation accuracy of 0.975 with BERT for task 2. With Word2Vec, the
training accuracy was 0.534 and validation accuracy was 0.480.</p>
      <p>For Task-1, Word2Vec gave an accuracy of 0.402 and a macro F1 score of 0.401 on the test
dataset (shown in Table 5). Observing the results of Task-1, when we compare the best run of
BERT (with 15 epochs) which gave a F1 score of 0.503, with the run with 20 epochs which gave
a macro F1 score of 0.482, we can observe a direct improvement of 4.35% has been achieved.
The result for the model with 20 epochs is low in comparison since the model is a victim of
over-fitting. As mentioned in table 4, for task 2, we attained an accuracy of 0.790 and a macro
F1 score 0.740 on a test dataset using BERT with 18 epochs which again turned out to be better
than Word2Vec due to its ability to better understand the contextual meaning of the sentence.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. Conclusion</title>
      <p>Task 1 of the challenge aimed to classify tweets based on sentiments for vaccination against
COVID-19 into three categories, namely “ProVax”, “AntiVax” and “Neutral”. For Task 2, our
aim was to classify whether a tweet was reporting symptoms of COVID-19 into four categories
- “Primary Reporting”, “Secondary Reporting”, “Third-Party Reporting” and “Non-Reporting”.
After preprocessing the tweets and implementing stop word removal, we applied the BERT
model which makes use of contextual embeddings to classify the tweets. In addition, we also
implemented the Word2Vec model which makes use of fixed embeddings for labelling the tweets.
We conclude from our experiments, which were carried out on corpora of around 4300 tweets
for Task1 and around 1600 tweets for Task2, that BERT is the superior algorithm for analysing
and classifying tweets based on COVID-19 and is significantly more capable of capturing the
underlying meaning in the best way possible. Multiple labels in the corpus make it challenging
for diferent models to perform well. However, the task was made easier to tackle by the use of
deep learning techniques and the bidirectional embeddings of BERT. In further work, we aim
to augment our current work with better hyperparameter modelling (RoBERTa, ERNIE) and
optimization techniques such as Bayesian Optimization and Population based Training.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Abd-Alrazaq</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Alhuwail</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Househ</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Hamdi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Shah</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Top concerns of tweeters during the covid-19 pandemic: infoveillance study</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of medical Internet research 22</source>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>e19016</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Shamrat</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Chakraborty</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Imran</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. N.</given-names>
            <surname>Muna</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M. M. Billah</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>P. Das</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rahman</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Sentiment analysis on twitter tweets about covid-19 vaccines using nlp and supervised knn classification algorithm</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science</source>
          <volume>23</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>463</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>470</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Samuel</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Ali,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Rahman</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. Esawi,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Samuel</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Covid-19 public sentiment insights and machine learning for tweets classification</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Information</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>314</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Kumar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Chinnalagu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Sentiment and emotion in social media covid-19 conversations: Sab-lstm approach</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: 2020 9th International Conference System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends (SMART)</source>
          , IEEE,
          <year>2020</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>463</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>467</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Kruspe</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Häberle</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Kuhn</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X. X.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Cross-language sentiment analysis of european twitter messages duringthe covid-19 pandemic</article-title>
          , arXiv preprint arXiv:
          <year>2008</year>
          .
          <volume>12172</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q. G.</given-names>
            <surname>To</surname>
          </string-name>
          , K. G. To, V.-
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
            <surname>Huynh</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N. T.</given-names>
            <surname>Nguyen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. T.</given-names>
            <surname>Ngo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Alley</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
            <surname>Tran</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
            <surname>Tran</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N. T.</given-names>
            <surname>Pham</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. X.</given-names>
            <surname>Bui</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Applying machine learning to identify anti-vaccination tweets during the covid-19 pandemic</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International journal of environmental research and public health 18</source>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>4069</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Adamu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M. J. B. M. Jiran</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.-H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Samsudin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Text analytics on twitter textbased public sentiment for covid-19 vaccine: A machine learning approach</article-title>
          , in: 2021
          <source>IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Engineering and Technology (IICAIET)</source>
          , IEEE,
          <year>2021</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>6</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Devlin</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M.-
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Chang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Toutanova</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Bert:
          <article-title>Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding</article-title>
          , arXiv preprint arXiv:
          <year>1810</year>
          .
          <volume>04805</volume>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Mikolov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Corrado,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Dean</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Eficient estimation of word representations in vector space</article-title>
          ,
          <source>arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781</source>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>