<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>European Management Journal</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>its impact on the buying behavior - an Empirical Study</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Valerie Busse</string-name>
          <email>valerie.busse@hm.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Christine Strauss</string-name>
          <email>christine.strauss@univie.ac.at</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vienna</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Austria</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Metaverse, Online Buyer Behavior, BPM Model</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Virtual Reality</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Munich University of Applied Science, Department of international Management</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Am Stadtpark 20, Munich</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>University of Vienna, Department of Marketing and International Business</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Oskar Morgenstern Platz 1, 1090</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2017</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>32</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>0009</fpage>
      <lpage>0009</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Metaverse represents a novel iteration of the future internet which currently features various technologies. This makes the scope of applications extremely broad. An important B2C application refers to online shopping. A survey is conducted to analyze the possible influence of the attitude-behavior relationship of buyer behavior. Based on the classic behavioral perspective model of purchase and consumption (BPM developed. The survey (i) investigates to what extent a selected part of the Metaverse, namely virtual reality (VR), affects the buyer behavior based on the BPM according to Foxall, and (ii) provide insights into the changed buyer behavior of digital natives aged between 20 and 25 years.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Metaverse is a three-dimensional virtual world inhabited by avatars of real people based on Neal
Stephenson’s novel published in 1992 “Snow Cash” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. It is known as a virtual world where one can
dive in via virtual reality (VR) glasses and create her or his own personal dream environment. The term
“Meta” got viral as Facebook’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced that his company will now be called
as “Meta” or “Meta Platforms” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>The new platform combines technologies and apps under one new umbrella brand. Metaverse seems
to merge the entire technological advances of Web 1.0, the internet, and Web 2.0, smart phones, social
media, and virtual/augmented/mixed reality, into a new area of Web 3.0. For this reason, Metaverse
most likely affects a wide range of online activities. As online shopping has gained tremendous
relevance worldwide, the study at hand aims to analyze if and how Metaverse has an impact on the
purchasing behavior of digital natives, which refer to people aged between 20 and 25 years. The
hypotheses, which form the basis of the survey, were formulated using the classic behavioral
perspective model of purchase and consumption according to Foxall [20,21].</p>
      <p>The remainder of the paper is structured as follows: Fist of all, the customer behavior in Metaverse
will be clarified including changes in current customer demands, the different application areas of
Metaverse and potential risks. Secondly, the theoretical background will be explained. Then, the
behavioral perspective model of purchase and consumption will be applied and hypothesis formulated.
Followed by the design and results of the empirical study. Finally, a conclusion will be derived based
on the results.</p>
      <p>2023 Copyright for this paper by its authors.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Metaverse and Customer Behavior</title>
      <p>The corona pandemic has forced companies to digitalize their processes rapidly. It has also forced a
rethinking of the importance of customer care. Suddenly, the study of customer journeys and
satisfaction metrics to shed light on what customers want, has given way to an acute urgency to meet
customers' needs and preferences.
2.1.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Changes in current Customer demands</title>
      <p>Current changes of customer needs can be observed in terms of behavior, expectations and requests
and can be summarized as follows:</p>
      <p>
        Increased online purchasing behavior: Customers are becoming more convenient, and therefore
online shopping and home delivery will increase. The pandemic has shown that the concept is being
embraced and is making life easier. As a result, it is crucial for any business to effectively implement
online sales and marketing strategies to keep up with the competition [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3">2,3</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Increased customer need for social experiences: Beyond the usual purchases, customers want to
have an experience and connect with others as the demand for interaction with others has peaked due
to pandemic isolation. This presents a major opportunity for companies to rethink their shopping
experiences for customers [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Higher demand for transparency: Customers today are demanding a higher level of transparency.
As many companies in various industries have betrayed customer trust through scandals, customers
today demand a clear picture of the supply chain, processes and ingredients [5].</p>
      <p>Increased focus on sustainability: Clean energy has been a trend before, but this year it will grow
exponentially as we clearly recognize the damage we have done to our planet. As consumers demand
more environmentally friendly products, suppliers will produce more, further driving demand. Demand
for electric vehicles, solar panels and vegan meat will be higher than ever before, and more and more
companies will adapt to this trend [6,7]</p>
      <p>Omnichannel communication: customers expect a coherent brand experience and 24/7 customer
service across all channels whenever it is convenient. AI and bots in the form of customer service will
lead to all channels being controlled [8].</p>
      <p>Stronger human element in customer interactions: customers expect a greater "human" element
in their interactions. Virtual meetings and the absence of gatherings make people eager for meaningful
conversations in real time [9].
2.2.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Application of Metaverse</title>
      <p>Metaverse can be applied in a wide range of possible applications and sectors:</p>
      <p>Work, Collaborate: The Metaverse could facilitate the transition to hybrid forms of work by
providing people with virtual work environments that enhance interaction. Imagine virtual meetings
where participants show up with their avatars and have conversations that are more lifelike than current
video conferencing capabilities allow [10, 11].</p>
      <p>Manufacturing, logistics: Companies can use digital twins to emulate manufacturing and logistics
processes in the metaverse, which can enable more cost-effective predictive planning and maintenance.</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Industrial engineers can test product designs in a mixed reality launch pad, for example [10].</title>
        <p>Education, training: Online experiences combined with avatars could expand opportunities for
learning and collaboration. A single avatar could move fluidly between different spaces, from the
lecture hall to the science lab to the operating room. Medical students could practice on a single avatar
before applying their skills to real patients [11].</p>
        <p>Consumer: Businesses and consumers could operate in a space where people live, work and shop
in a virtual world, which could expand the potential scope of interactions and transactions [10].</p>
        <p>Government, public sector: The Metaverse provides a platform for civic engagement and for
government officials to be more accessible to their constituents. Town meetings and public events can
be held virtually. Even city halls and embassies can be virtualized. This could lead to far-reaching
questions about how organizations can deliver services cost-effectively and where physical structures
are even necessary [12].</p>
        <p>Adventures, Experiences: Metaverse offers a huge range of virtual theaters and concerts around
the globe [10].</p>
        <p>Well-being, health, sports: the current focus on telehealth may evolve into virtual care to replicate
the in-person experience. The metaverse could spawn innovations in healthcare, from mental health and
pain management to surgery, fitness and physical therapy [10].
2.3.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Potential Drawbacks in Metaverse</title>
      <p>In addition to the advantages of Metaverse, different risk categories can be identified. These relate
not only to the technical data of the platform, such as energy waste and data garbage, but also to the
issue of users. The following example is intended to show a risk. For example, in the health care sector,
barriers and misunderstandings can arise between providers and users. For instance, risks for incorrect
medication and diagnosis can potentially lead to significant health damage [13, 22, 23].</p>
      <p>Another risk category is psychological risks. Here, racist, sexual harassment, mobbing, criminality
and irrationality can lead to depression in real life for users of the Metaverse. The generation Z is
particularly at risk here, as they have never experienced a reality without digitization and therefore place
greater trust in platforms and providers. The Metaverse cannot replace human communication and
haptic experiences [14, 15].</p>
      <p>Entry barriers can be considered a further risk category: These result from the fact that access to the
metaverse is only available to privileged groups of the population. This means that regions with
inadequate Internet coverage in particular cannot be reached by the metaverse, creating imbalances
between current and potential users [14, 15].</p>
      <p>In addition, there are the barriers to entry due to the user costs that arise from the virtual reality usage
conditions such as the virtual reality glasses and the virtual reality glove [13, 14].</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>3. Theoretical and Conceptual Background</title>
      <p>The Metaverse currently features various technologies such as virtual reality mixed reality, extended
reality, whatever reality, avatars digital twins, fast network, blockchain and smarts contracts
(nonfungible token, NFT) [10]. In the following analysis, based on the Behavioral Perspective Model of
Purchase and Consumption according to Foxall (BPM Model), it will be investigated to what extent a
selected part of the Metaverse, namely in this case virtual reality, affects the buyer behavior. The
analysis is to gain insights through a survey of digital natives. With a market volume of approx. 800
billion USD expected for the year 2024, the analysis is highly relevant [16].</p>
      <p>In order to place the empirical study on a profound scientific theoretical basis, the theory of buyer
behavior, the behavioral perspective model of purchase and consumption according to Foxall (BPM
Model), is taken as a basis [17].</p>
      <p>Scientific research has developed a number of theories to determine consumer decisions. The BPM
model of Foxall as well as the well-established tricomponent model of Rosenberg and Hovlands and
Fishbein-Aizen’s theory of reasoned actions are still the most common used theories of behavior
orientated decision making processes [18, 19].</p>
      <p>The focus of the BPM Model lies in an analytical approach to explore the possibilities of buyer
behavior explicitly focusing on the perspectives: Feeling, behavior and their influences.</p>
      <p>“A comprehensive account will eventually incorporate both cognitive and behavioral source of
explanation but, as a prelude to such synthesis; the BPM explores the implication of radial
environmental perspective on choice” (Foxall 1992, 189) [20].</p>
      <p>The BPM Model is based on two fundamental theses:
1. The expression of current customer behavior is a function of customer behavior in the past
2. Determinants of customer behavior must therefore be identified more in the customer's
environment than in the customer's personality itself</p>
      <p>Customer behavior itself is differentiated in the BPM model into role behavior (rule-governed
behavior) and random behavior (contingency-based behavior) [21].</p>
      <p>The current characteristics of the theories of buyer behavior developed in the past are fundamentally
changed by the Metaverse. This will be illustrated by the following example:</p>
      <p>If the buyer behavior is divided into a presale and an after sale, it is already recognizable, due to the
extreme growth of online trade, that almost 60% of the entire purchase process lies in the pre-sale
activities. The information search and product and detail research, as well as the product
recommendations of other customers that are publicly accessible are simplified and detailed by the
Metaverse. This raises the question of analyzing buyer behavior and the buying process under the
influence of Metaverse, especially for companies. The analysis of the behavior of ideal customers under
the influence of the Metaverse goes so far that salespeople have to penetrate the brain of ideal customers
in order to anticipate their behavior. The Metaverse offers excellent possibilities for this, especially
through avatars.</p>
      <p>Due to the broad application of the Metaverse from medical technology to hybrid work models
educational training to gastronomic application, the analysis will be limited in the following to the
purchase of durable consumer goods. This will also be the main focus of the survey. The survey is
conducted exclusively among digital natives between the ages of 20 and 25. The educational
background of all respondents is a bachelor's degree in business administration and international
management.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>4. Application of the Behavior Perspective Model</title>
      <p>In the following section the hypothesis are presented followed by the description of the categories
of buyer behavior.
4.1.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Formulating the Hypotheses</title>
      <p>First consequences and questions from the scientific-theoretical anchoring of the BPM model for
buyer behavior for durable consumer good under the influence of the Metaverse. Based on the theory
theses the following hypotheses can be derived in table 1:</p>
      <p>Customers buy durable consumer goods in the Metaverse because they have already
bought in the past in this medium (see thesis 1 BPM model)
Customers buy durable consumer goods in the Metaverse because they encounter
their experiences of other customers
Customers buy durable consumer goods in the Metaverse according to the pure
random principle (contingency based behavior)
Customers buy durable consumer goods in the Metaverse because they are close to
the role behavior of other personalities in their environment (ruled-governed
behavior)
Customers buy durable consumer goods in the Metaverse because they like the sales
setting
Customers buy durable consumer good in the Metaverse because they like the sales
setting and because they can transfer the product setting into their own environment
through virtual reality (see theses 2 BPM model)
Customers buy durable consumer good in the Metaverse because it exerts a
reinforcing advertising influence on buyer behavior directly next to the products
(see these 2 BPM model). Examples are celebrity endorsement and influencer
marketing.</p>
      <p>Hypothesis 8:</p>
      <p>Hedonic reinforcers affect buyer behavior in the Metaverse as important influencing
factors in the future</p>
      <p>In the BPM Model, the situation analysis shows that the customers behavior is determined by five
factors (i.e., current behavior setting, consumer’s learning, hedonic reinforcement, aversive stimuli and
informational reinforcement) as depicted in figure 1.</p>
      <p>Already in advance it is clear that the Metaverse influences current behavior setting and customer
learning history sustainably and significantly. Foxall sees further influencing factors on buyer behavior
in the form of hedonistic amplifiers. These are for example fantasy feeling fun amusement arousal
sensory stimulation and enjoyment (Foxall 1992, 191) [20].</p>
      <p>Such hedonistic amplifiers are offered in particular by the Metaverse, for example VR. Furthermore,
Foxall distinguishes four categories of buyer behavior accomplishment pleasure accumulation and
maintenance (see figure 2).</p>
      <p>From these theoretical principles, the following four questions can be addressed by focusing on the
changed buyer behavior of Metaverse.</p>
      <p>1. Customers buy consumer goods in Metaverse because their behavior conveys status symbol
character (accomplishment)
2. Customers buy consumer goods in the Metaverse because they feel great pleasure, high hedonic
(for example via VR)
3. Customers buy consumer goods in the Metaverse because they are bargain hunters
(accumulation high influence of prices at purchase)
4. Customers buy consumer goods in the Metaverse because they do it routinely and regularly
every week</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>5. Empirical Study: Design and Results</title>
      <p>The following survey was acquired with 53 students (digital natives) from Munich University of
Applied Science faculty of business administration Bachelor 4th semester. The results are as followed:</p>
      <sec id="sec-9-1">
        <title>Positive</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-9-2">
        <title>Negative</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-9-3">
        <title>Indifferent</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-9-4">
        <title>Median</title>
        <p>14.Can you imagine that Metaverse is able to
create desire for products (piece of furniture at
the beach under palm trees)
15.Can you imagine that the Metaverse
promotes bargain hunters?
16.Rate 7 Factors of influencing customer
behavior with scores and their influence by the</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-9-5">
        <title>Metaverse: (Intensity of Influence by the Metaverse in points) (1=weak, 5=high) 35 24</title>
        <p>The main results of the survey show that 94 % of the participants know the types and appearances of
Metaverse (Question 1). On the subject of influencing the Metaverse on buyer behavior the participants
answered as followed: 22% positive, 11% negative and 19% indifferent (Question 2). To the question
To which extent will customer behaviour change as a result of Metaverse(1 = not at all, 10 = immensive)
the mean value is 6.06 (Question 3). Pre-sale activity percentage of entity purchase process is up to
60,4% (Question 7). 45,8 % of the participants are scared of the development of Metaverse (Question
8). 67 % of the participants can imagine that avatars create status symbols that which can influence the
buying behavior (Question 13). 79 % of the participants are convinced or can imagine that buying
durable consumer goods in the Metaverse can promote bargain hunters (Question 15).
In the following the results are presented for each single hypothesis:</p>
        <p>Hypothesis 1: Customers buy durable consumer goods in the Metaverse because they have
already bought in the past in this medium (see thesis 1 BPM model).</p>
        <p>Hypothesis 1 cannot be confirmed, as only 17% of the participants have purchased in the Metaverse.
However 63% of the participants inform about durable consumer good via. VR in the Metaverse
(Question 4 and Question 5).</p>
        <p>Hypothesis 2: Customers buy durable consumer goods in the Metaverse because they
encounter their experiences of other customers
Only 29 % are buying durable consumer goods by imitating personalities in the Metaverse. Therefore
this hypothesis cannot be confirmed (Question 11).</p>
        <p>Hypothesis 3: Customers buy durable consumer goods in the Metaverse according to the pure
random principle (contingency based behavior)
The results show that 60% buy actually or potentially according to the pure random principle. The
hypothesis is therefore confirmed (Question 6).</p>
        <p>Hypothesis 4: Customers buy durable consumer goods in the Metaverse because they are close
to the role behavior of other personalities in their environment (ruled-governed behavior)
The results are as followed: 71% do not buy used goods because the imitate personalities in Metaverse.
Therefore the hypothesis 4 cannot be confirmed (Question 11).</p>
        <p>Hypothesis 5: Customers buy durable consumer goods in the Metaverse because they like the
sales setting
The results are as followed: 67% confirm the hypothesis. Therefore the hypothesis is confirmed
(Question 12).</p>
        <p>Hypothesis 6: Customers buy durable consumer good in the Metaverse because they like the
sales setting and because they can transfer the product setting into their own environment through
virtual reality (see theses 2 BPM model)
The results show that 67% of participants are buying or expected to buy durable consumer good in the
Metaverse because they like the sales settings specially via VR. Subsequently, the hypothesis is
confirmed (Question 14).</p>
        <p>Hypothesis 7: Customers buy durable consumer good in the Metaverse because it exerts a
reinforcing advertising influence on buyer behavior directly next to the products (see these 2 BPM
model). Examples are celebrity endorsement and influencer marketing
The results are as followed: Only 41,2% support the hypothesis. Therefore, it cannot be confirmed
(Question 10).</p>
        <p>Hypothesis 8: Hedonic reinforcers affect buyer behavior in the Metaverse as important
influencing factors in the future
The bar chart in figure 3 of responses shows predominantly a strong influence of hedonistic
determinants on buyer behavior by the Metaverse. Subsequently, the hypothesis is confirmed (Question
16)</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>6. Conclusion</title>
      <p>A survey was conducted to analyze possible influence of the attitude-behavior relationship of buyer
behavior. Based on the behavioral perspective model of purchase and consumption (BPM model) eight
hypotheses have been developed. Within the survey digital natives were asked to what extent their buyer
behavior is influenced by the Metaverse. A priori, it could be assumed that this target group in particular
has a strong influence on purchasing decisions in the Metaverse.</p>
      <p>A posteriori, it can be determined that influences on buyer behavior will increase. For instance, it
is noticeable that only 22 % of the participants of the survey have made purchases in the Metaverse
already and with the help of VR. It is also noticeable that 45,8 % of the survey participants showed
skepticism on the future development of the Metaverse. Out of eight hypotheses based on Foxall's BPM
model, four were confirmed and four hypothesis had to be rejected.</p>
      <p>Further research could be done in using a higher spread target group in terms of demographic factors
as this research only focuses on german survey participants. Other limitations are that only young people
were asked while older ones might have a different point of view on the development of Metaverse.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stephenson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Snow crash (Bantam Spectra trade paperback reissue)</article-title>
          .
          <source>Random House</source>
          , New York, NY,
          <year>2003</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Flint</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Woodruff</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gardial</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Customer value change in industrial marketing relationships: A call for new strategies and research“ Industrial Marketing Management</article-title>
          , Volume
          <volume>26</volume>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Issue</surname>
            <given-names>2</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>1997</year>
          ,
          <fpage>163</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>175</lpage>
          , doi.org/10.1016/S0019-
          <volume>8501</volume>
          (
          <issue>96</issue>
          )
          <fpage>00112</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>5</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ślusarczyk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hajizada</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kovalyova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sakhbieva</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Online Consumer Purchasing Behavior</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res</source>
          .
          <year>2021</year>
          ,
          <volume>16</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>2263</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2281</lpage>
          , doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16060125.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Handarkho</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Impact of social experience on customer purchase decision in the social commerce context</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Systems and Information Technology</source>
          , Vol.
          <volume>22</volume>
          No.
          <issue>1</issue>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          ,
          <fpage>47</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>71</lpage>
          , doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-05-2019-0088.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>