=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-3402/short04 |storemode=property |title=How do Albanian Biology Student-Teachers make use of ICT during their master studies? |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3402/short04.pdf |volume=Vol-3402 |authors=Eliana Ibrahimi,Jona Saliaj,Sara Berberi,Enejda Damzi |dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/rtacsit/IbrahimiSBD23 }} ==How do Albanian Biology Student-Teachers make use of ICT during their master studies?== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3402/short04.pdf
How Do Albanian Biology Student-Teachers Make Use of ICT
During Their Master Studies?

Eliana Ibrahimi1, Jona Saliaj1, Sara Berberi1, Enejda Damzi1
1
    Department of Biology, University of Tirana, Bulv Zogu I, 25/1, Tirana, Albania


                Abstract
                With the development of information and communication technologies (ICT) and the
           increasing of online teaching materials, ICT is becoming an essential aspect of teachers’
           education and competencies. This paper aims to investigate how and why Albanian biology
           student-teachers use ICT during their master studies. The study method involved a survey (n =
           56) of second-year biology student-teachers studying at the Faculty of Natural Sciences in two
           consecutive academic years, 2021-2022 and 2022-2023. The survey explored several topics,
           including general characteristics (age, gender, academic performance), access to digital
           equipment, digital competence, and the use of ICTs during studies. Our results show that
           students have low access to digital equipment. Students with high and average academic
           performance spent more time using ICT for study purposes than those with low academic
           performance (p<0.05). More than 90% of students emphasize that access to digital equipment
           and training is crucial to help them integrate ICT in their classes as teachers.


                  Keywords
                  Student-teachers, ICT, Computer-assisted learning, Digital competence


       1. Introduction
   Technology was an important development of                                                 To properly implement ICTs in their classes,
the 19th century, which brought substantial                                                   teachers have to own some primary competencies;
change in education and society. Technology and                                               one of them is digital competence.
biology are considered a “fantastic duo” because                                                 In Albania, technology reached the peak of its
both brought different perceptions, new                                                       use during the COVID-19 pandemic. During
developments in science, education, and                                                       isolation, lessons needed to take place online with
innovation in learning methodology.                                                           different programs. Technical problems are
   Technology offers many options to make a                                                   always present during online teaching, and
lesson attractive and friendly for students. So the                                           teachers should be able to deal with them to
teachers don't have to be limited to traditional                                              implement ICT properly in their classes [3]. In
teaching, and they may create engaging lectures to                                            this case, it is essential to train teachers and future
facilitate students' learning process [1]. It is also                                         teachers to own digital competence, including
essential that teachers use various tools during the                                          information, collaboration, communication with
learning process. In this way, they stimulate active                                          others, digital space, privacy security, and
learning, and students share their thoughts with                                              problem solution.
others [2].                                                                                      Student teachers face               personal and
                                                                                              environmental challenges in developing their ICT
Proceedings of RTA-CSIT 2023, April 26–27, 2023                                               skills. Research has shown that students’
Tirana, Albania.                                                                              perception of the importance of ICT in education
EMAIL: eliana.ibrahimi@fshn.edu.al (A. 1)
jona.saliaj@fshnstudent.info (A. 2)
                                                                                              and their confidence in using ICTs plays a vital
sara.berberi@fshnstudent.info (A. 3)                                                          role in the motivation of students to use ICT [4].
enejda.qama@fshnstudent.info (A. 4)                                                             Based on other studies, student-teachers have a
ORCID: 0000-0003-0956-215X (A. 1); 0000-0002-3464-9022 (A.
2); 0000-0001-5230-5058 (A. 3); 0000-0002-4969-8521 (A. 4)                                    positive attitude toward the use of ICT in teaching
              ©️ 2020 Copyright for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative
              Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
                                                                                              and learning. They are generally motivated to
              CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)                                         implement it when they become teachers [5, 6, 7].
   This paper aims to investigate how and why
Albanian biology student-teachers use ICT during
                                                              What kind of technical equipment is
their master studies in the teacher education
program.                                                       accessible for you as a student
                                                                 teacher at the institution?

    2. Methods
                                                           Projection system         32.1            48.2           17.9
 This study took place at the Department of
Biology, University of Tirana, Albania. The                    Digital camera           55.4                39.3      5.4
cohort being evaluated were second-year biology
                                                                        LMS             58.9                 33.9     7.1
student-teachers (N=56) in two consecutive
academic years, 2021-2022 and 2022-2023. The              Video-conferencing            53.6                33.9     10.7
student-teachers were invited via email to fill out
                                                          Personal computer      21.4        28.6            50
an online questionnaire composed of closed
questions (i.e., Likert scale and frequency of use)    Interactive whiteboard               58.9          17.9 19.6
and one open question.
 After consulting the literature on this topic, the                             0%                  50%              100%
questionnaire is formulated and organized into                                                      %
three sections. The first section included questions              No access      Limited access             Full access
on the students’ general characteristics, such as
age, gender, and academic performance. The
second part had questions covering access to           Figure 1: Access of biology student-teachers to
digital infrastructure (equipment, internet            technical equipment at the university.
connection). The third section asked students
about their digital competence and the use of ICTs     performance spent more time using ICT for study
during their master studies.                           purposes than students with low academic
  The data preprocessing and analysis are              performance (p<0.05). No significant difference
performed in SPSS 28.0. The data exploration is        is observed between students with high and
based on frequencies, descriptive statistics, and      average academic performance (p>0.05), see
visualizations. The relationships between selected     Figure 2. Also, there was no statistically
nominal variables in the questionnaire are tested      significant difference between different levels of
using the Chi-square test for independence. We         academic performance for the time spent using
used the Chi-square goodness-of-fit test to test       ICT for other purposes (Kruskal-Wallis test
whether the cases in a single categorical variable     X2(2)=5.33; p=0.07).
were equal across categories. To compare the           About 32.8% of students state they were involved
level of numerical variables within groups, we         in projects focusing on ICTs integration in
used the Kruskall-Wallis test.                         teaching processes by their professors during their
                                                       studies.
    3. Results                                           Half of the students use ICTs almost always for
   Survey results on student-teacher access to         communication and networking, their own
digital equipment show that only half have             development and learning, work organization,
personal computers. More than half of the              keeping records, and preparing projects and
students did not access interactive whiteboards        lessons. More than 60% of the students use ICT to
and video conferencing during their studies. A         find digital learning resources (Figure 3).
learning management system (LMS) was not                 Concerning the future integration of technology
accessed for practice by 58.9%, and a projection       in their work as teachers, 66.10% of students state
system by 32.1% of respondents (Figure 1).             that to be confident and very confident to use it to
   Student-teachers use technology for study           support the teaching of specific concepts or skills,
purposes 6.55 (±4.44) hours/week on average,           69.6 % to support various student learning styles
while the use of ICT for other purposes was 7.86       and to personalize learning, 64.3 % to enable
(±6.85) on average. Time spent using ICT for           teaching pupils with disabilities, and 74.8 % to
study purposes was related to academic                 foster pupils’ ability to use technology in their
`performance (Kruskal-Wallis test X2(2)=14.7;          education.
p<0.001). Based on pairwise comparison tests,
students with high and average academic
                                                                    To what extent have you used the ICT
                                                                     for the activities below during your
                                                                               master studies?

                                                                                 40
                                                                                 35
                                                                                 30
                                                                                 25
                                                                                 20
                                                                                 15
                                                                                 10
                                                                                  5

Figure 2: Mean (95% CI) of time (hours per                                        0
week) student-teachers spend using ICT for
studies and other purposes based on academic
performance.

  More than 90% of students emphasize that
access to digital equipment is important to very
important to help them integrate ICT into their
future work as teachers (Table 1). Similar results
are observed for the importance of training and
courses to help in ICT integration.
  Students think that including ICT in the                         Never                     Rarely
curriculum would impact ICT’s implementation
                                                                   Less than half the time   About half the time
in teaching processes. Time to practice is another
important factor that would help student-teachers                  More than half the time   Almost always
to improve their skills and incorporate ICT in their
classes (Table 1).
                                                              Figure 3: Use of technology for specific study
Table 1                                                       activities by biology student-teachers.
How significant are the following to help you as a
future teacher in integrating ICT into teaching?
                                                                  4. Discussion
              Not         Somewhat    Important   Very          The recent decade's teaching and learning
              important   important   (%)         important   methods have changed how teachers and students
              (%)         (%)                     (%)
                                                              practice their study sessions. Nowadays, the
 Access to                                                    education system does better combine classic
 digital
                                                              learning with e-learning. The perception and
                 7.2         1.8       44.6        46.4       inclusion of technology by student-teachers can
 equipment
                                                              be impacted by various factors, which according
                                                              to Ertmer et al. [8], were categorized into first and
 Training        3.6        12.5       42.9        41.1       second-order        barriers.    Although         this
                                                              categorization is outdated, the ideas still apply
 ICT in the                                                   today, with instances of these obstacles being
                 5.4         8.9       48.2        37.5
 curriculum                                                   referred to as school or teacher-related barriers,
                                                              respectively, as described in [9].
 Time to                                                        Our study shows that the most frequent
                 1.8        16.1         50        32.1
 practice                                                     drawback to technology integration is a need for
                                                              more digital equipment, which would constitute
an example of a first-order or school-related           purposes state that to be confident enough to use
barrier. Hew & Brush [10] report that the use of        technology to teach specific concepts and skills or
ICT in teaching practices depends on the                integrate different learning styles. In the case of
availability and access to digital equipment, time      ICT, younger student teachers will grow up with
constraints, and adequate technical support. Lack       extended experience in using new technologies in
of access to personal computers could be a              their daily lives [14].
problem regarding the student teacher’s ICT                 The results of this short study indicate that
literacy and the subsequent integration into            student teachers’ engagement with ICT is worthy
teaching [11]. However, this effect should be           of further critical investigation.
accounted for by guaranteeing appropriate
infrastructure such as interactive whiteboards,
projection systems, and video-conferencing,             5. Acknowledgments
among others, responsibility for which falls               We are grateful to the students who
mainly on the institution. Low access rates to          participated in the study.
technical equipment could be the direct
consequence of the scarcity of said equipment or
the poor organization of resources. The school
could possess the right amount of equipment but         6. References
has not yet ensured success for all its users. Time       [1] Valtonen, T. Kukkonen, J. Kontkanen, S.
is also a factor that impedes the access and further            Sormunen, K. Dillon, P. and Sointu, E.
use of ICT for teaching purposes. Student                       The impact of authentic learning
teachers, similarly to teachers, should be granted              experiences with ICT on pre-service
enough time to not only access but also acquaint                teachers' intentions to use ICT for
themselves with hardware and software to be able                teaching and learning. Computers &
to work their way around equipment and fully                    Education 81         (2015)       49-58.
prepare materials for their lessons, particularly               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.
online and multimedia content, as this would be                 09.008
much more engaging to students.                           [2]   Reinholz, DL. Stone-Johnstone, A.
    So-called blended learning, which has                       White, I. Sianez, Jr LM. Shah, N. A
advantages in the execution of a lesson that may                pandemic crash course: Learning to teach
be carried out electronically or in person, is one of           equitably in synchronous online classes.
the lesson models that can be used for                          CBE—Life Sciences Education 19
technological advancement [12]. Therefore,                      (2020) ar60. Doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-06-
students can engage in learning and access                      0126.
assigned lesson materials or assignments [13].            [3]   Ames, K. Harris, L.R. Dargusch, J.
Using a wide range of scientific materials, diverse             Bloomfield, C. So you can make it fast or
knowledge, and studying strategies offered online               come up: K-12 teacher’s perspectives on
due to information and communication                            technology's affordances and constraints
technology can highly represent a more                          when supporting distance education
qualitative learning process for a better                       learning.      Australian     Educational
performance of students who know how to benefit                 Researcher,      48    (2021)   359-376.
from it. However, to learn how to use media,                    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-
students must be able to improve their                          00395-8.
independence first. As our study shows, even              [4]   Hammond, M. Crosson, S. Fragkouli, E.
though students tend to use more online hours for               Ingram, J. Johnston‐Wilder, P.
other purposes than for studying, they still                    Johnston‐Wilder, S. Kingston, Y. Pope,
manage to incorporate ICT for their development                 M. Wray, D. Why do some student
and learning, for keeping records or preparing                  teachers make very good use of ICT? An
projects and lessons, as well as for finding digital            exploratory case study, Technology,
learning resources, regardless of the lack of                   Pedagogy and Education, 18 (2009) 59-
appropriate digital devices. As reflected in our                73, doi: 10.1080/14759390802704097
results, learning to use technology opportunities         [5]   Maaike, G. Michiel, V . Rube, V.
and self-build new skills greatly impacts a student             Declercq, L. De Wever, B. A systematic
teacher’s academic progress [13]. Almost the                    review of teacher roles and competence
same amount of students who use ICT for learning                for teaching synchronously online
     through videoconferencing technology.               https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-
     Educational Research Review 37 (2022).             0043-4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.10      [13] Sayaf, A.M. Alamri, M.M. Alqahtani,
     0461                                               M.A. Alrahmi, W.M. Factors Influencing
[6] Timothy, T. Zhou, M. Explaining the                 University Students’ Adoption of Digital
     intention to use technology among                  Learning Technology in Teaching and
     university students: a structural equation         Learning. Sustainability 14 (2022), 493.
     modeling       approach.     Journal     of        https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010493
     Computing in Higher Education 26              [14] Simpson, M. Payne, F. Munro, R.
     (2014) 124-142. doi:10.1007/s12528-                Hughes, S. Using Information and
     014-9080-3                                         Communications Technology as a
[7] Alamri, M.M. Almaiah, M.A. Al-Rahmi,                pedagogical tool: who educates the
     W.M.Social        Media       Applications         educators? Journal of Education for
     Affecting        Students’      Academic           Teaching: International Research and
     Performance: A Model Developed for                 Pedagogy        25    (1999)    247-262.
     Sustainability in Higher Education.                https://doi.org/10.1080/02607479919538
     Sustainability     12     (2020),     6471.
     https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166471
[8] Ertmer, P. A. Paul, A. Molly, L. Eva, R.
     Denise, W. Examining Teachers’ Beliefs
     About the Role of Technology in the
     Elementary Classroom. Journal of
     Research on Computing in Education, 1
     (2009)                              54–72.
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1999.1
     0782269
[9] Mulhim, E. A. The Barriers to the Use of
     ICT in Teaching in Saudi Arabia: A
     Review of Literature. Universal Journal
     of Educational Research, 6 (2014) 487–
     493.
     https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.02060
     6
[10] Hew, K. F.         Brush, T. Integrating
     technology into K-12 teaching and
     learning: current knowledge gaps and
     recommendations for future research.
     Educational Technology Research and
     Development, 3, (2006) 223–252.
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-
     9022-5
[11] Xhelili, P. Ibrahimi, E. Rruci, E. Sheme,
     K. Adaptation and perception of online
     learning during COVID-19 pandemic by
     Albanian         university       students.
     International Journal on Studies in
     Education, 3(2), (2021) 103-111.
[12] Kintu, M.J. Zhu, C. Kagambe, E.
     Blended learning effectiveness: the
     relationship        between         student
     characteristics, design features and
     outcomes. International Journal of
     Educational Technology in Higher
     Education 14 (2017) 7.