<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal
of Electrical and Computer Engineering</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1613-0073</issn>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2022/3594256</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Method for Parametric Adaptation Helicopters Engines On-Board Automatic Control System</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Serhii Vladov</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Yurii Shmelov</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ruslan Yakovliev</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Maryna Petchenko</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>L. Landau Avenue, 27, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61080</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Kremenchuk Flight College of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Peremohy street, 17/6</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Kremenchuk</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Poltavska Oblast, Ukraine, 39605</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>10</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The work is devoted to the improvement of helicopters turboshaft engines closed onboard neural network automatic control system by introducing a program module for parametric adaptation with submodules of linear and custom models. A mathematical description of the problem of parametric adaptation is given, which consists in calculating a modular similarity criterion. To ensure the desired behavior of the automatic control system, dynamic compensation of the free turbine speed controller was applied and replaced with a controller of a similar structure tuned in the desired way. For parametric adaptation, PID neuroregulators are used, which are an artificial neural network of the perceptron architecture with two neurons in the hidden layer. It has been experimentally proven that the optimal neural network training algorithm for solving the parametric adaptation problem is the use of a neural network training algorithm developed on the basis of the Nelder-Mead method. Primary and secondary checks of the parametric adaptation module with submodules of linear and adjustable models were carried out, the results of which showed that the maximum improvement in the quality indicators of adaptation of transient processes in helicopters turboshaft engines closed onboard neural network automatic control system by 30 % was achieved in relation to standard regulators. Helicopters turboshaft engines, neural network, training, automatic control system, Nelder-Mead method, PID neuroregulators, parametric adaptation module COLINS-2023: 7th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems, April 20-21, 2023, Kharkiv, Ukraine 5717 (M. Petchenko) ORCID: 0000-0001-8009-5254 (S. Vladov); 0000-0002-3942-2003 (Yu. Shmelov); 0000-0002-3788-2583 (R. Yakovliev); 0000-0003-1104-</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Automatic</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Currently, the problem of developing automatic control systems (ACS) for dynamic objects is
characterized by the transition from the adaptive control paradigm to the intelligent control paradigm,
while adaptive control methods are components of intelligent ACS [1, 2]. This is caused both by the
continuous complication of control objects and the conditions for their operation, the emergence of new
classes of computing tools (in</p>
      <p>particular, distributed computing systems), high-performance
telecommunication channels, and a sharp increase in the requirements for the reliability and efficiency
of control processes under conditions of significant a priori and a posteriori uncertainty. Taking into
account the above factors is possible only on the basis of the transition from "hard" algorithms of
parametric and structural adaptation to the anthropomorphic principle of control formation.
(R. Yakovliev);</p>
      <p>2023 Copyright for this paper by its authors.</p>
      <p>Aircraft gas turbine engines (GTE) ACS, including helicopters turboshaft engines (TE), is one of
the main systems that determine their efficiency and reliability. ACS GTE engines includes a number
of automatic regulation systems (ARS) designed to maintain and change controlled parameters
according to a given program. ARS of modern engines are becoming more and more complex, with the
inclusion of a large number of adjustable parameters and regulatory factors, more complex control
programs, the implementation of which requires the introduction of a new element base [3, 4].</p>
      <p>At present, electronic digital ACS [5, 6] are being intensively introduced, which have higher
accuracy and wide opportunities for optimizing of GTE controlling process. At the same time, much
attention is paid to the development and research of intelligent algorithms for monitoring and
diagnostics the operational status of GTE ACS using neural network technologies [7, 8]. At the same
time, due to a number of reasons (closedness of works, narrow specialization of the tasks being solved,
etc.), most publications lack theoretical and practical recommendations for solving the above problems,
which leaves a wide field of activity for conducting scientific research in this direction.</p>
      <p>Within the framework of this work, an urgent scientific and practical problem is being solved to
modernize the closed neural network on-board helicopters TE ACS [9, 10] by introducing a parametric
adaptation module into it, which will improve the quality of control of the main control channels of
helicopters TE compared to the use of standard regulators.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Related works</title>
      <p>The helicopters TE reliability operating in conditions of external and internal interference is largely
determined by the quality of the ACS, for the optimal implementation of the functions of which it is
necessary to obtain real-time reliable information about the current engine characteristics (fuel
consumption, temperature and pressure at the engine inlet / outlet subsystems, gas-generator rotor
r.p.m., free turbine rotor speed rotation, etc.).</p>
      <p>The features of onboard GTE ACS (including helicopters TE) are: high algorithmic complexity,
large number of calculations, high-speed information exchange in real time, diversified requirements
(reliability, functionality) for individual nodes and information transmission channels [11].</p>
      <p>It is known [12] that the validity of the input (measured) information is important for the quality of the
onboard ACS. At the same time, since the dimension of the state space of a modern aircraft GTE
significantly exceeds the dimension of the vector of parameters measured on board, it is difficult to establish
a deterministic one-to-one correspondence between them, and in some cases, it is impossible [13, 14].</p>
      <p>In this regard, the solution of the issues of adapting the onboard ACS to the action of external and
internal interference, as well as monitoring and diagnostics of GTE operational status, inevitably
requires the use of identification methods [15, 16]. In modern digital systems for automatic control of
aircraft engines, an increase in reliability in flight modes is achieved through the creation of algorithmic
information redundancy using the onboard mathematical model of an aircraft gas turbine engine built
into the ACS [17, 18]. At the same time, the accuracy of the engine model operating in real time under
operating conditions largely determines the quality of the current identification of engine parameters
and the reliability of the ACS as a whole [19, 20].</p>
      <p>Since the developed helicopters TE closed on-board ACS [9, 10] operates in conditions of
interference in the channel of the mathematical model (“noise” of the model) and in the channel of
measurement (“noise” of measuring sensors), an important task is to increase the accuracy of model
identification of engine parameters, taking into account current on-board measurements. This
determines the relevance of the proposed study aimed at creating adaptive algorithms for monitoring
helicopters TE, which make it possible to identify engine parameters with high accuracy under
conditions of external and internal interference.</p>
      <p>The scientific novelty of the proposed study lies in the further development of the solution of the
problem of parametric optimization of helicopters TE closed on-board ACS of civil and military
aviation, construct into the electronic controller, aimed at automatic parametric monitoring of the
gasair path of helicopters TE [21]. The advantage of the proposed approach is reliable real-time operation
on board a helicopter in the event of a change in its state and the action of external interference.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Methods and materials</title>
      <p>The helicopters TE closed on-board ACS was developed in [9, 10] and is shown in fig. 1, where TE
– helicopter TE, TE Model – model of helicopter TE, LB – logical block, FMU – fuel metering unit, FMU
model – model of fuel metering unit.</p>
      <p>Y0 = (nT0C , nF0T ,TG*0 )</p>
      <p>Regulator
u
u*</p>
      <p>FMU
FMU
Model</p>
      <p>GT</p>
      <p>Y = (nTC , nFT ,TG* )
TE</p>
      <p>TE
Model</p>
      <p>TE
Model</p>
      <p>LB
mod
 FMU
TE</p>
      <p>Modification of helicopters TE closed on-board ACS (Fig. 1) consists in supplementing with
modified compared to [9] software modules that implement adaptive control methods:
– signal adaptation module with submodules of linear and customizable models;
– parametric adaptation module;</p>
      <p>In this paper, using as a basis the results of Ivan Bakhirev's research for a ground-based gas turbine
plant, we consider the addition of the developed helicopters TE ACS with a reference or custom model
module, a parametric adaptation module (fig. 2). The vector x is presented in the following form:
x1 = nFT – free turbine speed, x2 = nTC – gas generator rotor r.p.m., x3 – gas metering regulator integrator,
x4 – nFT regulator integrator, that is, the input data vector Y0 is supplemented with the free turbines
speed parameter nFT and, accordingly, is converted to the form Y0 = (nF0T , nT0C ,TG*0 ) .
xм</p>
      <p>x
step, s</p>
      <p>Parametric
adaptation
module
Δki, Δkp, Δkf</p>
      <p>The input of the module is the step of solving differential equations that describe the dynamics of
the main processes of the engine [9, 10], xM – state vector of the reference or custom model, and x is
the reduced state vector of the control object. Based on the obtained data, the mismatch vector is
calculated. After that, the weighted sum of the mismatch vector is calculated. Then the increments of
the controller coefficients Δki, Δkf, Δkp are calculated. The increments of the controller coefficients Δki,
Δkf, Δkp are output variables of the module. The adaptation subsystem will work in accordance with the
algorithm shown in fig. 3. Description of the modules of the custom and reference models, respectively,
is given in [9].</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Getting operational status vector</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Model operational status vector calculation</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Mismatch vector calculation</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>Calculation of the weighted sum of the mismatch vector</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-5">
        <title>Calculation of the increments of the coefficients of the free turbine speed controller</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-6">
        <title>Finish</title>
        <p>The task of parametric adaptation [22] of helicopters TE closed on-board ACS is to determine the
parameters of its mathematical model that provide the greatest similarity of the responses of the model
and the object to the same input action. The problem is solved with the help of specialized software
based on the selected similarity criterion. The simplest similarity criterion q is the modular criterion,
which is determined according to the expression:
q (t ) = Yexp (t ) − Y (t ) ;
(1)
where Yexp(t) – helicopters TE output parameter experimental value; Y(t) – helicopters TE output
parameter value.</p>
        <p>Since the experimental values are most often presented as an array, the following notation of the
similarity criterion is used:</p>
        <p>n
q (t ) =  Yexpi (t ) − Yi (t ) ; (2)</p>
        <p>i=1
where Yexpi (t ) – helicopters TE output parameter experimental value at the i-th time point; Yi(t) –
helicopters TE output parameter value at the i-th time point; n – dimension of the experimental data array.</p>
        <p>With a normal distribution of the random error of the experiment, the use of a quadratic criterion
gives the greatest accuracy:
settings; WF−T1R – transfer function compensating the free turbine speed controller.</p>
        <p>2. Parameters of the tuned model: WFTR – free turbine frequency controller transfer function; WGDR
– gas dispenser regulator transfer function.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Experiment 4.1.</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Analysis and preprocessing of input data</title>
      <p>Helicopters TE mathematical model the input parameters are the atmospheric parameters values (h –
flight altitude, TN – temperature, PN – pressure, ρ – air density). The parameters recorded on board of the
helicopter (nTC – gas generator rotor r.p.m., nFT – free turbine rotor speed, TG – gas temperature in front of
the compressor turbine) reduced to absolute values according to the theory of gas-dynamic similarity
developed by Professor Valery Avgustinovich (table 1). We assume in the work that the atmospheric
parameters are constant (h – flight altitude, TN – temperature, PN – pressure, ρ – air density) [10, 22].</p>
      <p>Analysis and preprocessing of input data (table 1) are described in detail in [22]. For the purpose of
establishing representativeness of the training and test samples, a cluster analysis of the initial data was
performed (table 1), during which eight classes have been identified (fig. 5, a). Following the
randomization procedure, the actual training (control) and test samples were selected (in a ratio of 2:1,
that is, 67 % and 33 %). The process of clustering the training (fig. 5, b) and test samples shows that they,
like the original sample, contain eight classes each. The distances between the clusters practically coincide
in each of the considered samples, therefore, the training and test samples are representative [22].</p>
      <p>An important issue is the assessment of the homogeneity of the training and test samples. To do this,
we use the Fisher-Pearson criterion χ2 [24] with r – k –1 degrees of freedom:</p>
      <p> 2 = min =r1 i  mi n−pni(pi () ) ; (8)
where θ – maximum likelihood estimate found from the frequencies m1, …, mr; n – number of elements
in the sample; pi(θ) – probabilities of elementary outcomes up to some indeterminate k-dimensional
parameter θ.</p>
      <p>The final stage of statistical data processing is their normalization, which can be performed
according to the expression:
yi =</p>
      <p>yi − yi min ;
yi max − yi min
(9)
where y i – dimensionless quantity in the range [0; 1]; yimin and yimax – minimum and maximum values
of the yi variable.</p>
      <p>The specified statistics χ2 allows, under the above assumptions, to test the hypothesis about the
representability of sample variances and covariances of factors contained in the statistical model. The
area of acceptance of the hypothesis is  2   n−m, , where α – significance level of the criterion. The
results of calculations according to (8) are given in table 2.</p>
      <p>Calculating the value of χ2 from the observed frequencies m1, …, mr (summing line by line the
probabilities of the outcomes of each measured value) and comparing it with the critical values of the
distribution χ2 with the number of degrees of freedom r – k –1. In this work, with the number of degrees
of freedom r – k –1 = 13 and α = 0.05, the random variable χ2 = 3.588 did not exceed the critical value
from table 3 is 22.362, which means that the hypothesis of the normal distribution law can be accepted
and the samples are homogeneous [22].</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>4.2. Development of a neural network and the choice of an algorithm for its training</title>
      <p>For parametric adaptation, it is proposed to use PID neuroregulators, which are an artificial neural
network. The most common and simplest version for PID neuroregulators [25, 26], shown in fig. 6, was
chosen as the architecture of the neural network, where Ni – neurons of the hidden layer (i = 1…n), w11,
w12, …, w1n, w2, n+1, w3, n+1, …, wn+3, n+1 – weight coefficients forming weight matrix W.
ε(t)
ε'(t)
 (t ) dt
w22
w11
w3,n</p>
      <p>N1
N2
Nn
w5,n+1</p>
      <p>N0</p>
      <p>I</p>
      <p>As an assessment of the work of helicopters TE closed on-board ACS an integral criterion of the
form is adopted:</p>
      <p>
I ( W) =  F ( H (t, W)), (t, W) dt; (10)</p>
      <p>0
where x(t, W) – system output coordinate; ε(t, W) – system error; F – some convex function.</p>
      <p>The task of helicopters TE closed on-board ACS parametric adaptation is solved using a neural
network training algorithm based on the Nelder–Mead method [27], proposed by Professor Innokenty
Igumnov, which requires setting the following parameters: reflection coefficient α, stretching
coefficient γ, compression coefficient β.</p>
      <p>The operator of the control object (helicopters TE) Gp(p), taking into account the transfer function
that compensates the free turbine speed controller, is represented as:</p>
      <p>Gp ( p) = 1  ki + p  1  e− p ; (11)</p>
      <p>kp ki + k f  p (T1  p +1)  (T 2  p +1)
where Tμ1, Tμ2 – small uncompensated time constants of the object; τμ – small uncompensated delay time.</p>
      <p>The adaptation criterion is presented as:</p>
      <p>L
I ( W) =  2 (t, W) dt;
0
(12)</p>
      <p>Description
Formation of a set of initial simplices with point coordinates m (nm = 4n) (the number of
weight coefficients, which is determined by the fact that the neural network output, taking
into account the neural network architecture, reflects the response to values from a
separate synaptic weight).</p>
      <p>Equating to zero the value of all synaptic weights at the point m+1.</p>
      <p>Variation of entire set synaptic weights sign of their possible values at simplices points.
Calculation of the values of criterion (12) in each simplex for all points; in this case, it is
denoted as Iij, where i = 1, 2, … is the number of the simplex, j = 1, 2, … is the point of the
ith simplex.</p>
      <p>Definition I – characteristic number of a simplex – as I = min ( Iij ) . Below, we consider
only those simplices for which</p>
      <p>I
min ( I )</p>
      <p>  , μ ≥ 1.</p>
      <p>Performing the main operations of the Nelder-Mead method [27] with selected simplices:
"sorting", "reflection", "stretching", "compression", "truncation", "checking the fulfillment
of the search terminating criterion".</p>
      <p>Comparison of the results of the algorithm, which is understood as the search for points
with the smallest criteria I, for each simplex. By finding the Euclidean distance between
these points, the neighborhood of local extrema is determined, their set is formed, and
among it the point with the smallest value of criterion I is selected. Its values of synaptic
weights are considered optimal.</p>
      <p>Thus, when the criterion for terminating the search is met, the point with the smallest value of
criterion I will be considered a solution for this simplex.</p>
      <p>The neural network of the perceptron architecture consists of two neurons in the hidden layer, this
number is due to preliminary studies that showed an acceptable quality of regulation with this
architecture of the neural network.</p>
      <p>Reflection coefficient α = 1, stretch coefficient γ = 2, compression coefficient β = 0.5, truncation
coefficient d = 2 [27] are parameters of the neural network training algorithm that characterize the main
operations of the Neldra-Mead method.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>5. Results</title>
      <p>According to the research of Professor Innokenty Igumnov, since the neural network training
algorithm developed on the basis of the Nelder-Mead method has the ultimate goal of including it in
the algorithmic support of automatic systems, it is necessary to check its performance, which means the
convergence of the algorithm in the range of parameters, which is determined by practice automatic
regulation. In this work, such a check is based on a well-established method that uses modulation
characteristics [28].</p>
      <p>Due to the fact that γk – duty cycle of the k-th pulse, determined using a neural network, does not
use the modulation characteristic, then, based on the foregoing, we introduce the concept of a
pseudomodulation characteristic, the meaning of which is similar to it. This characteristic is construct by
feeding a control error to neural network input. Fig. 7 shows pseudomodulation characteristics for the
power activation function, where 1 and 4 – pseudomodulation characteristics, each of which belongs to
different initial simplices and is built from a point (a set of synaptic weights) that provides the minimum
value of criterion (3); 2 – pseudo-modulation characteristic obtained as a result of the neural network
training algorithm, launched from the initial simplex, which has pseudo-modulation characteristic 1 in
its composition; 3 – pseudomodulation characteristic, respectively, obtained from the initial simplex,
which has in its composition a pseudomodulation characteristic 4.</p>
      <p>Thus, fig. 6 shows the algorithm results convergence to one form of pseudo-modulation
characteristic (pseudo-modulation characteristics 2 and 3 coincide on the interval e є [0, λ] with
sufficient accuracy for practice). Similar results have been obtained for other activation functions.</p>
      <p>The numbers 1' and 2' in fig. 8 represent the dependencies of I on the number of neural network
training epochs, constructed from the initial simplices, which include pseudomodulation characteristics
1 and 4, respectively. The coincidence of dependencies 1' and 2' with sufficient accuracy for practice at
75 epochs of neural network training illustrates additional proof of the convergence of the algorithm.</p>
      <p>The researches were carried out in a fairly large range of helicopter TE parameters, for which
</p>
      <p>  1,
T
where T = max (T1;T 2 ) . As is known, with such a ratio, the acceptable quality of transient processes
is provided by impulse control laws.</p>
      <p>As an illustration, the results of the researches are given for kp = ki = kf = 1; Tμ1 = 10; Tμ2 = 40; τμ = 50
and the pulse repetition period T = 25 with a master action λ(t) = 0.5 · 1(t) and restrictions under which
the duty cycle γk obtained using the neural network lies on the segment from 0 to 1. Proceeding from
Based on the literature analysis [29, 30], the following activation functions for neurons in the hidden
layer were selected: logistic, power, hyperbolic tangent, sigmoidal (rational), and sinusoidal.</p>
      <p>Based on the results of the neural network training algorithm, the values of synaptic weights were
obtained, which correspond to transient processes (fig. 9, where 1 – result with a sinusoidal activation
function of neurons in the hidden layer of the neural network; 2 – power activation function; 3 –
activation function in in the form of a hyperbolic tangent, 4 – sigmoidal (rational) activation function,
5 – logistic activation function). The values of criterion (12) when using these activation functions are
given in table 4.</p>
      <p>To prove the correct choice of the number of neurons in the hidden layer and the activation function
of neurons, the sigmoid, an experimental addiction E = f(N) was built, shown in fig. 10.</p>
      <p>Fig. 10 shown: E – neural network training error; N – number of neurons in the hidden layer, where
1 – dependence of the network training error when using the sigmoid activation function of neurons; 2
– dependence of the network training error when using the logistic function of neuron activation; 3 –
dependence of the network training error when using the tangential (hyperbolic tangent) neuron
activation function; 4 – dependence of the network training error when using the sinusoidal activation
function of neurons; 5 – the dependence of the network training error when using the exponential
activation function of neurons.</p>
      <p>To prove the correctness of the choice of the neural network training algorithm, a comparative
analysis of the results of neural network training by various methods is given (table 5). From table 5
shows that the smallest root means square error (1.86835) with the least number of training epochs of
the neural network (200), as well as the smallest (given) number of neurons in the hidden layer (2) is
provided by the selected neural network training algorithm developed on the basis of the Nelder–Mead
method.</p>
      <p>Thus, the expediency of using two neurons in the hidden layer, as well as the selected neural network
training algorithm developed on the basis of the Nelder–Mead method, has been experimentally proven.</p>
      <p>The conducted studies of the performance of the neural network allow us to preliminarily state:
– PID-neuroregulators can be effectively used as regulators in helicopters TE closed on-board ACS,
which is confirmed by the results of the research of the convergence of modulation characteristics;
– the selected neural network training algorithm, developed on the basis of the Nelder–Mead
method, solves the problem of parametric adaptation with the best accuracy for practice;
– it has been proven that the best version of the neural network in the case of using the integral
quadratic criterion is the neural network of the perceptron architecture with the sigmoid activation
function of neurons.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>6. Discussions</title>
      <p>Let us consider the process of parametric adaptation with a tuned model without dynamic
compensation for a nonlinear model of TV3-117 aircraft engine (initial check). At the initial moment
of time, the state vectors of the linear adjustable model and the nonlinear model of TV3-117 aircraft
engine are equal. The transient process at the initial moment of time is due to the mismatch of the initial
conditions, together with a change in the load power, which is a complex mode of operation and is
similar to a change in load during the transient process.</p>
      <p>Fig. 11 shows the transient processes, where: 1 – tuning model (using a neural network); 2 – system
with a standard regulator. Fig. 12 shows the change in the values of the coefficients of the free turbine
frequency controller.
c d
Figure 11: Diagrams of change: a – free turbine speed; b – gas-generator rotor r.p.m.; c – dispenser
controller integrator; d – free turbine regulator integrator
c
Figure 12: Diagrams of change in the values of free turbine frequency controller coefficients: a –
diagrams of the change in the integral coefficient; b – diagrams of the change in the proportional
coefficient; c – diagrams of the change in the forcing coefficient</p>
      <p>By parametric tuning, quality indicators such as maximum deviation are improved. The results of
improving quality indicators during transients are given in tables 6 and 7.</p>
      <p>Table 4
Quality indicators for nFT of the reference model with a signal regulator</p>
      <p>Regulator type Maximum deviation, rpm Transient process time, s Number of vibrations
Regular 2200 10.5 2
Adaptive 1320 4.3 1</p>
      <p>Let us consider the process of parametric adaptation with a customizable model [10] for a non-linear
(element-by-element) model of TV3-117 aircraft TE [31]. At the first stage, the custom and
elementby-element models are compared. The element-by-element model controller coefficients are not
adjusted. The mismatch of the initial conditions causes a transient process up to the 15th second. Fig. 13
shows the results of the experiment, where: 1 – element-by-element model; 2 – tuned model [10].
c d
Figure 13: Diagrams of change: a – free turbine speed; b – gas-generator rotor r.p.m.; c – dispenser
controller integrator; d – free turbine regulator integrator</p>
      <p>The element-by-element model of TV3-117 aircraft TE is much more complicated than the custom
model [10], so the accuracy in identifying the custom model is worse than in the previously given cases.
Also, this may be due to the fact that the calculated value of the moment of inertia of the free turbine
and the equivalent time constant of the linearized model turbocharger were obtained from an insufficient
number of experiments, and, therefore, are not accurate enough.</p>
      <p>At the second stage, the regulator coefficients are tuned according to the current tuned model [10].
Fig. 14 shows diagrams of transient processes, where: 1 – element-by-element model; 2 – custom
model. Fig. 15 shows the change in the values of the coefficients of the free turbine frequency controller.
c d
Figure 14: Diagrams of change: a – free turbine speed; b – gas-generator rotor r.p.m.; c – dispenser
controller integrator; d – free turbine regulator integrator
c
Figure 15: Diagrams of change in the values of free turbine frequency controller coefficients: a –
diagrams of the change in the integral coefficient; b – diagrams of the change in the proportional
coefficient; c – diagrams of the change in the forcing coefficient</p>
      <p>The improvement in the quality indicators of transient processes occurs despite the fact that the
correspondence between the adjusted model and the object (TV3-117 aircraft TE) is not as high as in
the previous cases. The maximum improvement in quality indicators during transients is given in
tables 8 and 9.</p>
      <p>As can be seen from fig. 15, the values of the coefficients kp, ki and kf are close to 1, which indicates
the correct choice of their values, while at kp = ki = kf = 1, the maximum improvement in the quality
indicators of adaptation of transient’s processes in helicopters TE closed on-board ACS by ≈ 30 % is
achieved in relation to standard regulators (tables 6 and 8).</p>
      <p>A comparative analysis of the accuracy of the classical and neural network methods for controlling
helicopters TE (on the example of the TV3-117 aircraft TE) is given in table 10, which displays the
probabilities of errors of the 1st and 2nd kind in determining the optimal parameters nTC and nFT.
7. Conclusions</p>
      <p>1. The method of adaptive control with a customizable (or reference) model and parametric tuning
has been further developed, which makes it possible to automate the process of controlling helicopters
turboshaft engines at flight modes.</p>
      <p>2. The neural network method for monitoring helicopter turboshaft engines operational status at
flight modes has been improved through the use of a PID neurocontroller construct on the basis of a
neural network of the perceptron architecture with two neurons in the hidden layer, which led to a
decrease in errors of the first and second kind in determining the optimal engine parameters.</p>
      <p>3. It has been proven that the use of parametric tuning units with a customizable (or reference) model
in helicopters turboshaft engines closed on-board automatic control system improves the quality of
recognition of transient processes by an average of 30 % compared to the use of standard regulators.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>8. References</title>
      <p>[2] J. Zhao, Y.-G. Li, S. Sampath, A hierarchical structure built on physical and data-based
information for intelligent aero-engine gas path diagnostics, Applied Energy, vol. 335 (2023)
120520. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120520
[3] C. Weiser, D. Ossmann, Fault-Tolerant Control for a High Altitude Long Endurance Aircraft,</p>
      <p>IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 55, issue 6 (2022) 724–729. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.213
[4] J. Zeng, Y. Cheng, An Ensemble Learning-Based Remaining Useful Life Prediction Method for
Aircraft Turbine Engine, IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 53, issue 3 (2020) 48–53.
doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.11.00
[5] H. Sheng, X. Qi, Application of new digital signal processing technology based on distributed
cloud computing in electronic information engineering, Future Generation Computer Systems, vol.
128 (2022) 443–450. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2021.10.032
[6] A. M. Rojas, S. P. Amaya, J. M. Calderon, PBR Compiler: Automatic system description generator
software, IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 55, issue 4 (2022) 219–224. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.06.036
[7] S. Kiakojoori, K. Khorasani, Dynamic neural networks for gas turbine engine degradation
prediction, health monitoring and prognosis, Neural Computing &amp; Applications, vol. 27, no. 8
(2016) 2151–2192. doi: 10.1007/s00521-015-1990-0
[8] Y. Shen, K. Khorasani, Hybrid multi-mode machine learning-based fault diagnosis strategies with
application to aircraft gas turbine engines, Neural Networks, vol. 130 (2020) 126–142.
doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.001
[9] S. Vladov, Y. Shmelov, R. Yakovliev, Helicopters Aircraft Engines Self-Organizing Neural
Network Automatic Control System. The Fifth International Workshop on Computer Modeling
and Intelligent Systems (CMIS-2022), May, 12, 2022, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, CEUR Workshop
Proceedings, vol. 3137 (2022) 28–47. doi: 10.32782/cmis/3137-3
[10] S. Vladov, Y. Shmelov, R. Yakovliev, Modified Searchless Method for Identification of
Helicopters Turboshaft Engines at Flight Modes Using Neural Networks, 2022 IEEE 3rd KhPI
Week on Advanced Technology, Kharkiv, Ukraine, October 03–07, 2022 (2022) 57–262.
doi: 10.1109/KhPIWeek57572.2022.9916422
[11] M. T. Yildirim, B. Kurt, Aircraft Gas Turbine Engine Health Monitoring System by Real Flight
Data, International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, (2018) 1–12.
doi: doi.org/10.1155/2018/9570873 URL: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijae/2018/9570873/
[12] V. Avgustinovich, T. Kuznetsova, The validation algorithms for input information of an onboard
mathematical model built into the automatic control system of an aircraft engine, Journal
Information-measuring and Control Systems, vol. 13, no. 9 (2015) 19–26.
[13] K. B. Liu, S. Huang, Integration of data fusion methodology and degradation modeling process to
improve prognostics, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 13 (2016)
344–354.
[14] M. Soleimani, F. Campean, D. Neagu, Diagnostics and prognostics for complex systems: A review
of methods and challenges, Quality and Reliability Engineering, vol. 37, issue 8 (2021) 3746–3778
doi: 10.1002/qre.2947
[15] M. Zagorowska, O. Wu, J. R. Ottewill, M. Reble, N. F. Thornhill, A survey of models of
degradation for control applications, Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 50 (2020) 150–173.
doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.08.002
[16] F. Lu, Y. Huang, J. Huang, X. Qiu, Gas turbine performance monitoring based on extended
information fusion filter, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 233, issue 2 (2018)
doi: 10.1177/0954410018776398
[17] B. Li, Y.-P. Zhao, Y.-B. Chen, Unilateral alignment transfer neural network for fault diagnosis of
aircraft engine, Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 118 (2021) 107031.
doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107031
[18] H. Chen, Q. Li, S. Pang, W. Zhou, A state space modeling method for aero-engine based on
AFOS</p>
      <p>ELM, Energies, vol. 15 (11) (2022) 3903. doi: doi.org/10.3390/en15113903
[19] S. Pang, Q. Li, B. Ni, Improved nonlinear MPC for aircraft gas turbine engine based on
semialternative optimization strategy, Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 118 (2021) 106983.
doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106983</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>