<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>International Journal on Advanced Science</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su13031127</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Model of Educational Process Intelligence Technologies Organizing Using Artificial</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Lviv Polytechnic National University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Stepan Bandera str, 12, Lviv, 79013</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Oleh Karyy</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Ihor Novakivskyi, Yaroslav Kis, Ihor Kulyniak and Alexander Adamovsky</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2023</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>2022</volume>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>27</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>An overview of common artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, as well as the main trends of their application in the field of education, was carried out. The perspectives of personalization of lifelong learning have been analyzed. The prospects of modern LMS universities' implementation in globalized educational intellectual ecosystems are revealed. The results of a survey of higher education institutions teachers regarding the expected increase in the efficiency of LMS use due to the implementation of AI elements were analyzed. An analysis of the possibilities of modeling the educational environment in higher education institutions was carried out. It is proposed to use the triad of models “student educational subject - educational process” to analyze the application of AI technologies in education. Based on the model of organizing the educational process, a scheme for calculating the AI use effectiveness integrated indicator is proposed. An approach to choosing the optimal knowledge assessment system based on available opportunities is suggested. A mathematical model of the generalized knowledge assessment algorithm is given. At the level of the student model, an optimization model of student training has been developed in the phase space of knowledge, taking into account the possibilities of applying AI technologies.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>1 Education</kwd>
        <kwd>learning management system (LMS)</kwd>
        <kwd>artificial intelligence (AI)</kwd>
        <kwd>efficiency</kwd>
        <kwd>mathematical model</kwd>
        <kwd>personalized learning (PL)</kwd>
        <kwd>model of the student</kwd>
        <kwd>model of the educational process</kwd>
        <kwd>model of the educational subject</kwd>
        <kwd>optimal learning trajectory</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>The middle of the 20th century was marked by the beginning of the intensive development of the
global electronic information environment. The widespread of high-speed computer technology and
the rapid development of ICT has opened fundamentally new broad horizons for the innovative
development of human society in general. In the 21st century, the expansion of the Internet of Things
[1] created prerequisites for the creation of digital copies of the real society in every segment of
human activity, from production to finance, health care, education, transportation, robotics, etc. The
availability of access to all information resources without restrictions on the time and place of access
created conditions for working with the information application model in real-time.</p>
      <p>The COVID-19 pandemic has played the role of a catalyst for the mass adoption of new ICTs to
support remote work in almost all spheres of human activity. According to UNESCO experts, the
pandemic created problems for educational processes for about 1.6 billion students in more than 190
countries of the world, which in turn led to the accelerated development and application of modern
educational technologies [2]. In turn, new educational technologies had to be adapted to use in
different classrooms with different levels of professional and computer literacy, which led to the
introduction of learning methods based on artificial intelligence (AI) [3; 4]. The accelerated
implementation of new ICTs is confirmed, for example, by the following data. International Data
Corporation (IDC) predicted that “the volume of the technology industry will exceed 5.3 trillion
dollars in 2022” [5]. A distinctive feature of such revolutionary transformations was the intensive
spread of the number of communications carried out, which in turn led to the development of AI
systems. It is predicted that by 2028 the world AI market will be “641.30 billion dollars with an
average annual growth rate of 36.1%” [6]. Remote workplace models are getting closer to the real
world through the use of virtual world tools.</p>
      <p>Today, the implementation of AI elements is massive and spontaneous. As the analysis showed,
numerous scientists, pay attention to the issues of expanding the scope of AI and the development of
digital technology learning platforms using AI. Their implementation is determined by empirical
judgments. This situation is because AI technologies are developing so quickly that the use of
retrospective analysis is very problematic. It can be stated that insufficient attention is paid to the
issue of modeling processes involving AI technologies in education, and there are some unresolved
problems in this area.</p>
      <p>In our opinion, the improvement of educational processes should involve the approbation of
changes using AI models, especially if it concerns the implementation of AI elements. The purpose of
this work is to develop rational approaches to the application of AI technologies, as well as a model of
their rational use. According to the above, the purpose of the research is to solve the following tasks:
• to determine the prospects of implementing modern AI technologies in educational processes;
• to outline the areas of the AI technologies application formalization;
• to develop a model for evaluating the efficiency of the AI technologies implementation in
educational processes.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Related works</title>
      <p>The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the integration of innovative ICTs into the education
sector. The processes of introducing innovative digital technologies into educational processes, and
AI [7], in particular, accelerated especially intensively. According to MarketsandMarkets analytics in
2022 the global AI Market reached USD 86.9 billion. It is projected to grow at a CAGR of 36.2%
during the forecast period to reach USD 407.0 billion by 2027. The growth of data-based AI and
advancement in deep learning and the need to achieve robotic autonomy to stay competitive in the
global market are the major growth drivers [8].</p>
      <p>At the beginning of 2023, Microsoft and Google introduced chatbots based on AI into their search
engines [9].</p>
      <p>The penetration of innovative ICTs is increasingly expanding the scope of AI. Among the famous
researchers in the field of using AI in the educational process, it is worth mentioning such as:
O. Zawacki-Richter, V. I. Marín, M. Bond, F. Gouverneur [10], S. A. D. Popenici, S. Kerr [11],
I. Roll, R. Wylie [12]. In particular, Rudolf Urbanek [13] cited the following main areas of using AI
to improve educational processes: individualization of learning, involvement of intellectual assistant
tutors, automated detection of knowledge gaps, assistance in choosing educational institutions, and
smart schools.</p>
      <p>The systematization of scientific sources [7; 14] makes it possible to highlight the following
factors that determine the need for a radical renewal of the education system:
• insufficient consideration of students' interests;
• the passivity of teaching methods, which are out of touch with dynamic changes in society;
• the need for periodic retraining or even a change of profession;
• reducing the need for specialists in the field of maintenance of traditional industries, where
mechanized robotic systems are increasingly used;
• dynamic change in the needs of specialists in various fields;
• increasing the need for specialists who can make creative decisions in various spheres of
activity;
• insufficient attention to the development of student's creative abilities.</p>
      <p>In addition, the intensive mass distribution of technologies threatens the quality of educational
processes, as it enables students to prepare papers or perform consultations in an operational mode.
For example, according to Forbes “…Considering that 90% of students are aware of ChatGPT, and
89% of survey respondents report that they have used the platform to help with a homework
assignment, the application of OpenAI’s platform is already here. More from the survey: 48% of
students admitted to using ChatGPT for an at-home test or quiz, 53% had it write an essay, and 22%
had it write an outline for a paper…” [15].</p>
      <p>The modern global information and educational environment is formed based on ICTs and is
aimed at the formation of professionally significant and socially important personality qualities in the
conditions of the digitalization of society [16; 17]. According to O. Prokopenko, R. Holmberg,
V. Omelyanenko [18], O. Hrynkevych, O. Sorochak, O. Krayevska [19], the main elements of such an
informational and educational environment should include:
• information and communication subscriber nodes and connections between them;
• means and technologies for collecting, storing, processing, and transmitting information and
knowledge;
• audiovisual information reproduction means;
• organizational structures and power institutes of support and maintenance of educational
processes.</p>
      <p>The modern informational and educational environment of each university should provide:
• informational and methodological support of the educational process;
• planning and support of educational processes and resource support;
• monitoring of educational processes and their results;
• information support of educational processes;
• support of a specialized communication environment in the global network.</p>
      <p>As already mentioned, modern education should reorient itself to the formation of a specialist with
increased adaptability, the ability to effectively form communications, and be oriented towards
lifelong learning.</p>
      <p>Based on the above requirements for the training of specialists, such an information environment
should be as flexible and adaptable as possible not only to consumers of educational services in
general but also to take into account public needs [20; 21], based on the socio-economic environment
[22]. This situation leads to the increasingly massive use of AI elements. For example, the elements of
AI as a separate intelligent agent can be easily replicated and thus switch learning from the mass to
the individual student [23; 24].</p>
      <p>The diversity and multifunctionality of existing ICTs form a multifaceted educational environment
that has a large number of degrees of freedom. The most common technologies include natural
language processing, machine translation, pattern recognition, intelligent learning, AI probabilistic
planning, intelligent agents, game engines, and adaptive user models in a personalized learning
environment.</p>
      <p>A review of literary sources [7; 10; 11; 12; 18] made it possible to highlight the following main AI
technologies in education: Internet of Things (IoT), Smart graphics, Big Data, Data Science, Data
Analytics, Computer Vision (CV), Natural Language Processing (NLP), Deep Learning (DL),
Intelligent Virtual Agents &amp; ChatBots, Gamification &amp; serious games.</p>
      <p>To organize an educational virtual environment, educational institutions began to widely use the
learning management system (LMS) [25] for complex centralized management of educational
processes, which is used for the development, management, and distribution of online educational
materials with the provision of shared access. The most well-known LMSs are [26; 27; 28; 29]:
360Learning, TalentLMS, Absorb LMS, Skyprep, iSpring Learn, Adobe Captivate Prime, D2L
Brightspace, Trakstar Learn (formerly Mindflash), Canvas LMS, Docebo, Cornerstone, Web site
LMS, Moodle. The most popular system in the world is Moodle. According to the experts of the
eLearning Industry platform, “By 2024, it is expected that 47% of LMS tools will be enabled by AI
capabilities” [27]. A typical functional content of learning management system (LMS) is shown in
Figure 1.</p>
      <p>information and
communication system of</p>
      <p>interactions
automated system of
educational and pedagogical
load distribution
informational reference
system for supporting
educational processes</p>
      <p>LMS
automated database of
control tasks</p>
      <p>automated library of
electronic educational and
methodical materials
automated system for
monitoring the level of
knowledge, success, and
activity of those who study</p>
      <p>The spread of the pandemic in the world, on the one hand, contributed to the enormous expansion
of the scope of such systems for distance learning, and on the other hand, it showed their weakness
due to the strict automation of service procedures.</p>
      <p>General aspects of the modernization of educational organizations in the conditions of
globalization were considered in works [4; 14]. Scientists are paying more and more attention to the
improvement of professional training at universities [17]. There is a growing trend of creating
corporate-sponsored research structures within universities. In such laboratories, applied research and
development are carried out in the interests of the sponsoring company. Modern research universities,
which are characterized by a high level of scientific production, play a crucial role in the training of
high-class specialists [30] and the production of innovations [31]. In particular, P. Altbach [32]
examines the range of different types of research-oriented tertiary education institutions. Of course, a
modern university plays a huge role in the development of society, both within the framework of the
multi-university concept and as a consulting center, accumulation, and preservation of society's
memory. The expanded formulation of the university’s mission can be presented as “dissemination,
preservation, interpretation, and creation of new knowledge” [33]. It is quite difficult to find the
optimal balance between teaching and research, which brings the university to a qualitatively higher
level of efficiency. A research university consumes a lot of information resources, which in turn leads
to the widespread use of AI technologies.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Methods</title>
      <p>AI technologies have begun to be intensively implemented in the educational sphere. The use of
adaptive intellectual structures in the LMS will contribute to the deployment of a flexible system of
interactions of educational institutions, including cooperation and competition, the provision of this or
that service. The complex LMS technology with implemented elements can be attributed to the ASI
class. After all, such an educational ecosystem will ensure flexible adaptation to technological and
structural changes in the organization of educational processes. In perspective [34] “In the lifelong
learning model ..., universities will codesign curricula in full partnership with employers and
learners… they will have to sit down with learners to map out their professional needs and outcomes
candidly. Just as important, they will respond to changes in the workplace by inviting employers to
discuss their business demands”.</p>
      <p>The formation of an intellectual educational ecosystem is possible in the conditions of a developed
digital society. Let us show in Figure 2 the conceptual structural and graphic model of its functioning.</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Users IoT</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Intermediary</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Teachers</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>Intelligent Agents and Chatbots</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-5">
        <title>Platform (API interface+Big Data) NLP</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-6">
        <title>Big Data</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-7">
        <title>Machine</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-8">
        <title>Translation</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-9">
        <title>Pattern</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-10">
        <title>Recognition</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-11">
        <title>Probabilistic</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-12">
        <title>Planning</title>
        <p>The intellectual educational ecosystem, in addition to various structural organizations, includes
integrated network and cloud infrastructure, systems, software, and applications that use analytics, AI,
and machine learning to provide digital personalized interaction, as well as a variety of IoT devices
and sensors. The value of such a solution lies in the prompt solution of specific educational tasks, and
openness to connecting new participants. It is appropriate to make an opinion of Joseph E. Aoun [35]
“...the multi-university network is a multilocation entity existing across multiple states and even
multiple countries. Each node of the network is connected to the other, such that learners can circulate
through it to take advantage of academic programs, learning resources, and experiential learning
opportunities. In many ways, it is the next logical iteration of a university, taking into account the
forthcoming need to serve a growing population of lifelong learners”.</p>
        <p>A properly selected research methodology for the introduction of AI into the educational process
allows scientists to develop a scientific approach to studying the organization of the educational
process, using AI as a tool for data collection and processing. Applying the right research
methodology helps scientists identify problematic questions that need to be investigated; collect and
analyze data and develop a theoretical model for organizing the educational process using AI.
Correctly used research methodology allows scientists to obtain accurate and objective research
results and helps to ensure the correspondence of the obtained results to real learning processes.</p>
        <p>For the formation and description of the theoretical Model of Educational Process Organizing
Using AI Technologies in institutions of higher education, the authors used general scientific
methods, in particular:
• survey and questionnaire methods. These methods allowed us to collect data from students
and teachers about their experiences using AI in education. Studying the views and opinions of the
participants of the educational process helped to conclude the efficiency of introducing AI into the
educational process. Data was also collected among teachers to determine the expected increase in
the efficiency of LMS use due to the introduction of AI elements;
• an experimental method that, based on the results of a survey of teachers of higher education
institutions, made it possible to obtain conclusions about the expected increase in the efficiency of
the use of the LMS due to the introduction of AI elements. Flexibility, completeness of the task,
and ease of interaction became the summary evaluation criterion. Statistical methods were used to
analyze the data obtained regarding the survey of teachers and find regularities in the educational
process;
• method of system analysis. This method consisted in considering the learning process as a
system and investigating its elements and the interaction between them using AI in the
relationship. Using the observation method, the authors observed the educational process,
collected data on the efficiency of the use of AI at various stages of education, and obtained a
more complete picture of the organization of the educational process. As a result, a Complex
Model of Educational Process Organizing was formed.</p>
        <p>Modeling of educational processes should be built on a student-centered basis. The use of AI
technologies ensures a high level of flexibility and adaptability of educational processes. The
organization of educational processes can be presented in the form of Figure 3.</p>
        <sec id="sec-3-12-1">
          <title>Model of the student</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-12-2">
          <title>Model of the</title>
          <p>educational subject</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-12-3">
          <title>Model of the educational process</title>
          <p>The formalization of the organization of educational processes is due to a practical need, as it
allows automation of the entire complex learning process, diagnosis of the quality of results,
document management, and record-keeping in the cloud storage. A student in such a smart
environment can learn, coordinate interactively and communicate both with real teachers and
Intelligent agents in online modes.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Experiment</title>
      <p>In recent years, the process of implementing AI technologies has accelerated due to the significant
intensification of the spread of forms of distance education due to the COVID pandemic. More and
more teachers and students strive to work at a convenient time, which is often impossible due to the
established work schedules of the educational institution's staff. The involvement of AI elements will
make it possible to qualitatively increase active interaction with the educational environment. During
November-December 2022, a survey was conducted among teachers of higher education institutions
regarding the expected increase in the efficiency of LMS use due to the introduction of AI elements.
The evaluation was carried out on a 10-point scale, where 1 is no efficiency, and 10 is the maximum
level of efficiency of LMS use due to the introduction of AI elements. Flexibility, completeness of the
task, and ease of interaction became the summary evaluation criterion. The survey results for each
indicator are shown in Figure 4-12.</p>
      <p>The summary characteristics of the model of the educational process with the obtained estimates of
the prospects for the use of AI elements are shown in Table 2.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Results 5.1.</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Model of the student</title>
      <p>The main task of the Model of the student is to most accurately reflect the student’s learning
trajectory using feedback mechanisms to optimize learning outcomes. Building a highly adaptive
student-centered education system is a complex task, which necessitates the use of modeling methods
for analysis. The foundation for building mathematical models of the educational process can be
considered the work of R. Douady [36], in which the main provisions of didactic engineering were
formulated.</p>
      <p>The basic element of student evaluation is such criteria as objectivity and integrity in the
systemfunctional sense, the essentiality of characteristics, the clarity and consistency of the property of the
object display, the specified level of accuracy, and the unambiguity of the scientifically based method
of calculating the criterion. To evaluate students, you can use B. Bloom’s [37] extended taxonomy by
supplementing the scale with skills (Figure 13).</p>
      <sec id="sec-6-1">
        <title>The ability to qualitatively implement the idea and get the final result</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-2">
        <title>The ability to build an algorithm and plan a solution to a problem</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-3">
        <title>Judgment (forming a field of decisions based on certain knowledge)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-4">
        <title>Synthesis (composition of elements for the formation of new knowledge)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-5">
        <title>Analysis (decomposition of knowledge for a better presentation of an idea)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-6">
        <title>Application (use knowledge in specific conditions)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-7">
        <title>Understanding (ability to translate thought, interpretation)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-8">
        <title>Knowledge (level of memorization and reproduction of information)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-9">
        <title>Ignorance</title>
        <p>In the simplest case, a student’s knowledge can be displayed on certain scales. In a formalized
form, the assessment of knowledge control can be represented by the formula:</p>
        <p>
          Rating:  ×  ⟹     , (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          )
where Rating – the operator of the student’s knowledge control results interpretation; Student – the
student’s knowledge of the main phase planes of assessment; Subject – constructive block of
knowledge control according to the given structure of knowledge verification;     – the
documented result of the student’s knowledge control.
        </p>
        <p>When the mapping is discrete one-dimensional, then we will get the usually integrated point
estimate. An example of the presentation of the results of Result is the student's knowledge
assessment scale. Note that the given knowledge and skills are manifested in different degrees and
different combinations.</p>
        <p>The learning process is dynamic, and the results of the learning process for each student undergo
stochastic deviations in such phase planes as the student’s activity, the level of knowledge
assimilation, the completeness of knowledge, the depth of knowledge, and the ability to apply
knowledge [38] or students have disabilities or chronic diseases [39].</p>
        <p>
          Therefore, the trajectory of the educational process must be adjusted in the specified phase planes.
In terms of didactic engineering, the task of managing the educational process can be formulated as
maximizing the functionality that reflects the educational process:
 = ∫  00   1( );  2( );  31( );  4( );  5( );  1  1( ) ;  2  2( ) ;  3  3( ) ;  4  4( ) ;  5  5( ) ∙  ( )  →   , (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          )
where F – objective function learning for the student; x1(t) – the student's activity at a moment in time
t; x2(t) – the level of assimilation of knowledge at the moment of time t; x3(t) – completeness of
knowledge at the moment of time t; x4(t) – depth of knowledge at a moment in time t; x5(t) – the
ability to apply knowledge at the moment of time t; yk(xk(t)) – adjustment function by parameter
k=1,2,3,4,5; s(t) – the weight of the impact at a moment in time t.
        </p>
        <p>
          For modern learning conditions, when slices of knowledge are carried out at separately given
moments, a simplified mathematical model can be applied:
 = ∑ 0= 0   1( );  2( );  31( );  4( );  5( );  1  1( ) ;  2  2( ) ;  3  3( ) ;  4  4( ) ;  5  5( ) Δ  →   . (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          )
The use of modeling methods allows a critical approach to the application of AI technologies,
taking into account the capabilities of the educational institution, its level, and industry direction.
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Model of the educational subject</title>
      <p>Model of the educational subject represents a pedagogically adapted system of concepts about
phenomena, regularities, laws, theories, methods, etc. of any field of activity with the determination of
the required level of formation of those who study, a certain set of abilities and skills. The main
conceptual approaches to building a model of an educational discipline can be a semantic model of an
educational discipline in a convenient form for comprehension; a quality system for the presentation
of teaching and methodical materials; a toolkit for presenting teaching and methodical materials in a
digital environment; the mechanism for controlling the conduct of control classes (exams), etc.</p>
      <p>Let’s consider the model of the educational discipline from the standpoint of performing control
classes, taking into account the adaptability of the knowledge control mechanism. The use of AI
technologies is due to the need to eliminate such negative features of automated control as the
subjectivity of knowledge assessment due to the pattern of developed test tasks, as well as due to
noncompliance with ethical rules, and academic dishonesty of students. A comparison of different
methods of assessing student performance using AI technologies is given in Table 1.</p>
      <p>The choice of a specific control model depends on the educational institution's ability to ensure the
required level of adaptability and flexibility of the corresponding automated knowledge control
system due to AI technologies. A similar approach with other relevant parameters can be applied to
other components of the educational discipline model.
5.3.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Model of the educational process</title>
      <p>The modern model of the educational process can be represented as a set of interconnected
automated information systems with implemented AI technologies (Table 2).
Development, approval, monitoring, and updating
of educational programs, curricula, and their linking
in a logical sequence. Preparation of educational</p>
      <p>materials
Support for the mechanisms of transparent and
competitive involvement of teaching staff and
control over compliance with academic ethics
Support and improvement of distance learning
technologies, development of software and</p>
      <p>hardware for teachers and students
Organization of control measures to assess
students’ knowledge (identity verification,</p>
      <p>monitoring of student behavior, etc.)
Supporting the work of advisory centers, providing
access to educational and methodological materials</p>
      <p>LMS + PL</p>
      <p>LMS + PL, DL,
Data Science, Big</p>
      <p>Data</p>
      <p>LMS + PL,
Gamification, CV</p>
      <p>LMS + PL, CV
LMS + DL, CV</p>
      <p>Current
state</p>
      <p>Forecast
for 5
years</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>6. Discussions</title>
      <p>The relevance of radical transformations in educational processes is primarily due to changes in
requirements for employees. These changes can be interpreted as a transfer of emphasis from static
knowledge within the framework of stability of operating conditions to the ability to creative work
with constant improvement of qualifications or even professional reorientation [40]. It is possible to
state the actualization of preparation for working in a group [41; 42], the ability to communicate
effectively [43], and professional competence. The spread of the developmental approach in
professional education and the expansion of the use of AI are obvious.</p>
      <p>The mass emergence of innovative digital educational tools affects and transforms all areas of the
education system, which, as a result of technological changes, is undergoing an academic revolution.
Traditional studies in the field of education got additional opportunities. Both in Ukraine and abroad,
it has become quite natural to use distance learning systems that provide the organization and conduct
of classes provided by educational processes, and access to prepared specialized electronic sources of
information. We emphasize that this use of innovative AI technologies ensures the achievement of the
fourth global goal of sustainable development [44], adopted by the leaders of the UN member states at
the 70th session of the UN General Assembly in September 2015 “Ensure inclusive and equitable
quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all”.</p>
      <p>The real implementation of AI technologies should be based not only on specific realities but also
take into account development trends. The use of these technologies is primarily determined by the
level of their implementation in human activity. It is appropriate to indicate three generally accepted
levels of development of AI technologies [10; 11; 23; 26]:
• Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI) in education is characterized by the permanent and
spontaneous application of various autonomous household AI technologies (for example, text
recognition). In the future, these technologies were improved and mechanisms of individual
adjustment within the framework of the local office were built into them. Technologies of this
level are not capable of automatic customization or self-development.
• Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) in education covers AI technology that replaces the
knowledge of a specialist tutor. Working with the end user involves taking into account his/her
condition, potential, limitations on cooperation in time and space, etc. Such AI technologies are
capable of improvement using self-development algorithms built into them.
• Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI) involves the formation of an eco-educational environment
for the educational training of the user, which is oriented toward lifelong learning. The use of such
a level of intelligence will dramatically increase their educational efficiency. However, the
emergence of the consciousness of AI technologies causes additional risks (for example, the
ethical plan of equating computer self-awareness with a person).</p>
      <p>The proposed model of educational process organizing using AI elements can be applied under the
following conditions:
• availability of qualitative and quantitative data. The model requires a complex of relevant and
reliable data about students studying, information about their progress and answers to tasks,
educational programs, educational materials, pedagogical methods, etc.;
• availability of appropriate information and technical infrastructure. Working with the model
requires appropriate information and technical infrastructure, including computing power and
software that can ensure the optimal operation of the model;
• compliance with ethical and legal standards. When applying the model of organizing
educational processes, it is necessary to observe ethical and legal standards, especially taking into
account the privacy of the data of students and other participants of the educational process;
• availability of AI specialists. Experts in AI and machine learning are needed to develop and
apply the model. They must have the appropriate knowledge and experience to develop, train and
organize educational processes in higher education institutions.</p>
      <p>The advantages of the proposed model of educational process organizing using AI elements
compared to traditional models proposed by other scientists [45] are:
• assistance in identifying the individual needs of students and adapting the educational process
to their needs and level of knowledge;
• facilitating the collection, processing, and analysis of data, which makes it possible to make
more accurate forecasts and improve the organization of the learning process;
• improved tracking of student progress and reporting on academic achievement.</p>
      <p>However, there are some potential disadvantages associated with the use of the educational process
organizing model, in particular: dependence on the quality and accuracy of the data collected and
processed; vulnerability to errors related to data sampling and analysis; decrease in interpersonal
interaction between students and teachers; privacy and data security issues, etc.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>7. Conclusions</title>
      <p>The education system and the educational process develop concerning society and technological
progress. In recent years, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and russia’s aggression, the system has
undergone a grandiose transformation following the rapidly changing situation.</p>
      <p>The most promising direction in the qualitative improvement of the higher education system is the
widest possible implementation of AI technologies in the information systems of universities, which
is aimed at providing conditions for adaptive personalized lifelong learning. The primary task is to
consolidate the assimilation of knowledge, for which it is advisable to monitor and correct the
student’s learning trajectory, for which the methods of predictive analytics of success and
psychodiagnostic according to their “digital footprint” should be applied.</p>
      <p>It is important to consider that the technologies of AI in education are just beginning to be applied
and therefore are used fragmentarily. However, it should be expected that in the future AI will
become an integral part of educational programs, and it will be impossible to present education
without the participation of AI, which will control all stages of the educational process.</p>
      <p>However, the implementation of AI technologies in educational processes is determined by the
following factors:
• a wide range of modern AI technologies with different functional directions;
• development of educational information systems is a creative process that is unique for each
educational institution;
• rather a complex process of implementation of new digital technologies, which often requires
the transformation of educational and methodological standards;
• there is a bias toward decisions made using AI.</p>
      <p>We should add that the cost of implementing AI technologies is quite high, and therefore their
implementation projects must be well-founded. The results of this work are aimed at the development
of various mechanisms for predictive justification.
8. References
[9] The Guardian, How will Google and Microsoft AI chatbots affect us and how we work? 2023.</p>
      <p>
        URL:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/feb/07/how-will-google-and-microsoft-aichatbots-affect-us-and-how-we-work.
[10] O. Zawacki-Richter, V. I. Marín, M. Bond, F. Gouverneur, Systematic review of research on
artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International
Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 16(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) (2019).
doi:10.1186/s41239-0190171-0.
[11] S. A. D. Popenici, S. Kerr, Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and
learning in higher education, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 12(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        )
(2017). doi:10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8.
[12] I. Roll, R. Wylie, Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education, International
Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 26(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ) (2016) 582–599.
doi:10.1007/s40593-0160110-3.
[13] R. Urbanek, AI will support the uniqueness of your children. He can reveal their strengths [AI
podpoří jedinečnost vašich dětí. Dokáže odhalit jejich silné stránky], 2022. URL:
https://umelainteligence.forbes.cz/AI-a-vzdelavani.
[14] O. Hrynkevych, O. Sorochak, O. Panukhnyk, N. Popadynets, R. Bilyk, I. Khymych, Y. Viktoriia,
Competitiveness of higher education system as a sector of economy: Conceptual model of
analysis with application to Ukraine, in: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 3rd
International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration, IHSI 2020, Volume 1131
AISC, pp. 439–445. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39512-4_69.
[15] C. Westfall, Educators Battle Plagiarism As 89% Of Students Admit To Using OpenAI’s
ChatGPT For Homework, 2023. URL:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chriswestfall/2023/01/28/educators-battle-plagiarism-as-89-ofstudents-admit-to-using-open-ais-chatgpt-for-homework/?sh=16bea301750d.
[16] N. Shpak, L. Maznyk, Z. Dvulit, N. Seliuchenko, O. Dragan, K. Doroshkevych, Influence of
digital technologies on the labor market of HR specialists, in: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 6th
International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems, COLINS 2022,
Volume 3171, pp. 1475–1487.
[17] T. Bielialov, T. Vlasiuk, A. Vergun, A. Kononenko, O. Chernysh, Formation of a graduate
system for assessing professional activities in the entrepreneurship education system, Journal of
Entrepreneurship Education 22(1S) (2019).
[18] O. Prokopenko, R. Holmberg, V. Omelyanenko, Information and communication technologies
support for the participation of universities in innovation networks (comparative study),
Innovative Marketing 14(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ) (2018) 17–29. doi:10.21511/im.14(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ).2018.03.
[19] O. Hrynkevych, O. Sorochak, O. Krayevska, Internationalization of higher education under a
new reality (case study of Ukraine), Education systems: Past, current and future trends (2022) 1–
71.
[20] O. Prokopenko, L. Shmorgun, V. Kushniruk, M. Prokopenko, M. Slatvinska, L. Huliaieva,
Business process efficiency in a digital economy, International Journal of Management 11(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        )
(2020) 122–132. doi:10.34218/IJM.11.3.2020.014.
[21] M. Dudek, I. Bashynska, S. Filyppova, S. Yermak, D. Cichoń, Methodology for assessment of
inclusive social responsibility of the energy industry enterprises, Journal of Cleaner Production
394:136317 (2023). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136317.
[22] O. Salnikova, L. Rodchenko, T. Bielialov, M. Skrypnyk, L. Ivanchenkova, O. Slobodianiuk,
Matrix approach to risk management in the national security system, highlighting the criteria for
choosing the optimal strategy for decision making, International Journal of Engineering and
Advanced Technology 8(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ) (2019) 2407–2411.
[23] O. Neumajer, Artificial intelligence in education and the work of teachers [Uměla inteligence ve
školstvi a praci učitele], 2019. URL:
https://spomocnik.rvp.cz/clanek/22033/umelainteligenceve-skolstvi-av-praciucitele.html.
[24] O. Veres, P. Ilchuk, O. Kots, The concept of using artificial intelligence methods in debt
financing of business entities, in: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 6th International Conference on
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems, COLINS 2022, Volume 3171, pp. 1542–
1556.
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Sadeghi-Niaraki</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Internet of thing (IoT) review of review: Bibliometric overview since its foundation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Future Generation Computer Systems</source>
          <volume>143</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <fpage>361</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>377</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.future.
          <year>2023</year>
          .
          <volume>01</volume>
          .016.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Wallengren Lynch</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Dominelli</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Cuadra</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>C.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Information communication technology during</article-title>
          <source>COVID-19, Social Work Education</source>
          <volume>42</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>13</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1080/02615479.
          <year>2022</year>
          .
          <volume>2040977</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            von
            <surname>Hagke</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Hill</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Hof</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Rinder</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Lang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Habel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic crisis to overcome the global environmental crisis</article-title>
          .
          <source>Sustainability (Switzerland)</source>
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <issue>17</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2022</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/su141710545.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Adefila</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Arrobbio</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Brown,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Robinson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Spolander</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Soliev</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Willers</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Morini</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Padovan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Wimpenny</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Ecologized collaborative online international learning: Tackling wicked sustainability problems through education for sustainable development</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability</source>
          <volume>23</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>41</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>57</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .2478/jtes-2021-0004.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5] CompTIA, CompTIA's IT Industry Outlook,
          <year>2022</year>
          . URL: https://connect.comptia.org/content/research/it-industry
          <article-title>-trends-analysis.</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Verified</given-names>
            <surname>Market</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Research</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Artificial Intelligence Market</source>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          . URL: https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/download-sample/?rid=
          <fpage>3162</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Shaikh</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Kumar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Jani</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Mitra</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
            <surname>García-Tadeo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Devarajan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The role of machine learning and artificial intelligence for making a digital classroom and its sustainable impact on education during COVID-19</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Materials</surname>
            <given-names>Today</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <source>: Proceedings</source>
          <volume>56</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>3211</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3215</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.matpr.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>09</volume>
          .368.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>[8] Artificial Intelligence Market Analysis &amp; Report Summary, Clobal Size</source>
          ,
          <year>2022</year>
          . URL: https://www.marketsandmarkets.
          <source>com/Market-Reports/artificial-intelligence-market74851580.html.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>