<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Workshop on Learnersourcing: Student-Generated Content @ Scale</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Steven Moore</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Paul Denny</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Hassan Khosravi</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Chris Brooks</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>John Stamper</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Carnegie Mellon University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="US">United States</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>University of Auckland</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Auckland</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="NZ">New Zealand</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>University of Michigan</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Ann Arbor, Michigan</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="US">United States</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>University of Queensland</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>St Lucia, Queensland</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="AU">Australia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>The first annual workshop on Learnersourcing: Student-generated Content @ Scale took place at
Learning @ Scale 2022 conference. This workshop exposed attendees to the ample opportunities in the
learnersourcing space, including instructors, researchers, learning engineers, and many other roles.
Participants from a wide range of backgrounds and prior knowledge on learnersourcing benefitted and
contributed to this workshop, as learnersourcing draws on work from education, crowdsourcing,
learning analytics, data mining, machine learning, and many more fields. Additionally, as the
learnersourcing process involves many stakeholders (students, instructors, researchers, instructional
designers, etc.), multiple viewpoints helped to inform what future student-generated content might be
useful, new and better ways to assess the quality of the content and spark potential collaboration efforts
between attendees. We ultimately showed how everyone can make use of learnersourcing and have
participants gain hands-on experience using existing tools, create their own learnersourcing activities
using them or their own platforms, and take part in discussing the next challenges and opportunities in
the learnersourcing space. Our workshop attendees were interested in scaling the generation of
instructional and assessment content and those interested in the use of online learning platforms.</p>
      <p>Prior to the workshop, we provided participants with access to the two core systems being discussed
at the beginning of the session, PeerWise and RiPPLE. Participants were able to investigate the
activities and affordances each system offers, the review process for questions, and much more to both
learn about and even participate in learnersourcing themselves. Our hope was that during the workshop,
attendees could then ask any questions and gain a better understanding of the types of learnersourcing
data, if they wish to do so, before we meet. Finally, we posted a brief survey to collect the backgrounds
and interests of the participants to help tailor our discussions and activities.</p>
      <p>The workshop focus was on examining the tools, processes, and content that is both used and
generated through learnersourcing. We began with introductions and an overview of the learnersourcing
landscape, to bring all participants, regardless of background, up to speed on the concept and latest
trends. Two presentations and demos were then run to highlight different learnersourcing tools, with an
emphasis on how the student-generated content can be used by instructors and researchers. We then
had participant presentations, where the accepted submissions were presented for roughly five minutes
each. Following that, we held a thirty-minute break that included coffee and light snacks. From there,
we then demonstrated how participants can add learnersourcing activities of their own to practically
any piece of educational technology (MOOCs, LMSs, etc.). Participants then engaged in a discussion
around the challenges, opportunities, and future of learnersourcing, including how we can incentivize
quality student-generated content, while also empowering the instructors and learners with insights.
The workshop concluded with a summary of the day’s events, core challenges and opportunities we
addressed in the discussions, and an emphasis on future collaborations.</p>
      <p>During the workshop, these key questions and ideas were addressed by the committee and
participants:
• Incentivizing student participation with learnersourcing activities
• Exploring novel formats of learnersourcing content
• Assessing student-generated content
• Incentivizing high-quality student contributions
• Providing actionable and explainable insights to students and teachers</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Supporting multi-institutional sharing and collaboration with learnersourced content</title>
      <p>•
•
•</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Training students to develop high-quality resources</title>
      <p>Exploring models of co-creating content</p>
      <p>Encouraging student participation and engagement with learnersourcing
Once the workshop was concluded, we began working on publishing the accepted papers as part of a
workshop proceedings. Additionally, we hope the interactions during the workshop to result in the
adoption of learnersourcing for many of the participants, whether that be using one of the tools, the
discussed datasets, or creating learnersourcing activities in their own platforms and courses. We also
offered participants the chance to join a Slack channel and mailing list dedicated to sharing out advances
in learnersourcing. Through these channels, we will continue to share datasets collected from these and
other learnersourcing systems. We envision that these datasets can be leveraged by participants for
future studies and potentially be the focus of a future workshop or competition at L@S. Ultimately, we
want to keep the participants involved and promote collaboration between attendees. We hope to repeat
this workshop, as we strive to make this become part of the basis for a community of researchers who
are interested in learnersourcing and assessment generation at scale.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>