<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>SA.EL., via Peschiera</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>TopKontrol: a Monitoring and Quality Control System for the Packaging Production</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Marco Calamo</string-name>
          <email>calamo@diag.uniroma1.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Adriano De Franceschi</string-name>
          <email>adriano.defranceschi@ikarton.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Gabriele De Santis</string-name>
          <email>g.desantis@diag.uniroma1.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Francesco Leotta</string-name>
          <email>leotta@diag.uniroma1.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Civita Mazzaroppi</string-name>
          <email>civitamazzaroppi@acomeazienda.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Jerin George Mathew</string-name>
          <email>mathew@diag.uniroma1.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Massimo Mecella</string-name>
          <email>mecella@diag.uniroma1.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Flavia Monti</string-name>
          <email>monti@diag.uniroma1.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Claudio Sabatino</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Luca Visani</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Marco Visani</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>A Come Azienda</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>via Galileo Galilei 64, 04011 Aprilia (LT)</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Ikarton</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>via Giulia 98, 00186 Rome (RM)</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>via Ariosto</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>25, 00185 Rome (RM)</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2023</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>04011</issue>
      <fpage>12</fpage>
      <lpage>16</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Industry 4.0 refers to the last revolution involving the manufacturing domain. Particularly, it is characterized by the introduction of innovative technologies and systems able to establish a high level of digitization. The adoption of these technologies is crucial to the development of more intelligent manufacturing processes. These processes should be able to independently exchange information, trigger actions and control each other, enabling an intelligent manufacturing environment. By creating manufacturing systems where machines are enhanced with sensors and IoT devices, the productivity and quality of the production will increase. In this paper we explore the TopKontrol project's objectives and results in the context of the packaging production line.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Industry 4</kwd>
        <kwd>0</kwd>
        <kwd>smart manufacturing</kwd>
        <kwd>monitoring system</kwd>
        <kwd>packaging industry</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The concept of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], also known as the fourth industrial revolution, is, today,
a result of the emergence and distribution of new technologies, such as digital and internet
technologies, which allow for the development of fully automated production processes. These
processes involve only physical objects that interact without human interventions [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Smart Manufacturing is a term that is commonly associated with Industry 4.0. It aims to
improve manufacturing processes in order to increase productivity and quality, ease workers’
lives, and create new business opportunities. This is made possible by leveraging innovative
technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), big data analytics and Business Decision Support
Systems (BDSS).</p>
      <p>
        Digital Twin (DT) is a key technology used in the industrial context to achieve such goals.
Authors in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] propose a consolidated and generalized definition for a Digital Twin as a virtual
representation of a physical system (and its associated environment and processes) that is
updated through the exchange of information between the physical and virtual world.
Interestingly, several other definitions of DT can be found in the literature [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. The application of DT
can impact the way products are designed, manufactured, and maintained. On a high level, the
DT can evaluate production decisions, access product performance, command and reconfigure
machines remotely, handle troubleshoot equipment remotely, and connect systems/processes to
improve monitoring and optimize their control [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5 ref6">5, 6</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Quality control is another crucial aspect of manufacturing, and Industry 4.0 ofers new
opportunities for improving quality control processes. With the help of Industry 4.0 key
enabling technologies, including Internet of Things (IoT) and Industrial IoT (IIoT) concepts,
it is possible to collect vast amounts of data on the manufacturing process. This data can be
analyzed in real-time allowing to identify and address quality issues as soon as they arise,
minimizing waste and improving overall eficiency. Digital Twin can also play a significant role
in quality control. By employing DTs simulation techniques manufacturers can test the impact
of design and production choices on product quality. This allows manufacturers to identify
potential quality issues before they occur in the physical world, reducing the need for costly and
time-consuming testing and rework and implementing, therefore, Zero-Defect Manufacturing
(ZDM) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. Furthermore, DTs enable the implementation of proper maintenance techniques,
e.g., predictive and prescriptive maintenance, that can let production processes operating at
peak eficiency [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. By leveraging on IoT sensors and AI algorithms, manufacturing equipment
are monitored to identify potential issues before they lead to downtime or quality problems.
      </p>
      <p>This paper presents TopKontrol, an industrial project that focuses on the packaging domain.
By utilizing various data devices and sources, including Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) beacons
and industrial cameras, TopKontrol aims at the development of a monitoring and quality control
system for cardboard production. This system will serve two main purposes: first, it will
monitor the die cutter, which is responsible for cutting the cardboard, by predicting its health
and ensuring a timely replacement before it wears down. Second, the system will also detects
errors on individual cardboards to avoid further waste of resources and time. Overall, the final
purpose of the TopKontrol project is to improve the eficiency of the cardboard production
process by identifying potential problems before they occur.</p>
      <p>The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 provides a summary of the TopKontrol project,
Section 3 and Section 4 respectively outline the expected and current project results. Finally, in
Section 5 conclusions and future works are outlined.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Summary of the project and objectives</title>
      <p>In 2018, TopKontrol was initiated as an industrial project with the purpose of creating a smart
die cutter to monitor and improve the cardboard production process. The project has been
supported by Italian entrepreneurship special funds, which leads to the creation of the private
company spin-of iKarton. The consortium includes Sapienza Università di Roma as research
unit, iKarton as the company commercially exploiting the system, A Come Azienda and SA.EL.
as product certification experts. The first version of the TopKontrol system has been released in
March 2023 and a first set of three industrial installations will be completed by the end of 2023.
Die machines, also known as a die cutting machines, represent the key equipment used in such
process. A die machine is composed of two heavy rollers, one of which has a die cutter attached
to it. A die cutter consists a wooden board equipped with a set of blades and rubber blades
in a specific design. The design of the die cutter is usually based on a drawing of the desired
shape, which is created using Computer Aided Design (CAD) software. The CAD file serves as a
blueprint for the die cutter, guiding the placement and shape of the blades and rubber blades to
ensure that the final product is precisely cut to meet the required specifications. There are two
primary types of die cutters: rotary and plane. Specialized blades attached to the die cutter can
create cuts or folds in the cardboard. These blades have diferent names, including cut blade,
crease blade, cut-crease blade, and perforating blade. In the manufacturing process of cardboard,
it is common to use rotary die cutters over plane ones as they work faster. The process, depicted
in Figure 2, begins with a conveyor belt that transport each raw cardboard from a stack and
position it between the two rollers of the die machine. The roller with the die cutter applies
pressure to the cardboard, producing cuts and folds according to the design. After the cardboard
has been cut and folded to the desired shape, it is stacked and packaged for shipment to various
customers. Die machines are capable of producing high-quality cardboard at high speeds, with
the motorized roller typically set between 1 to 10 rotations per second. Thus, these equipment
can produce a number of cardboard that ranges from a minimum of 3,600 pieces per hour, up
to a maximum of 36,000 pieces per hour. Over time, die cutters can deteriorate and produce
faulty cardboard sheets, leading factories to halt production and request a new or repaired
die cutter. Typically, packaging factories avoid storing duplicate die cutters due to their size,
as spare parts require twice the inventory space. Unfortunately, this approach can lead to
ineficiencies and disruptions in production, causing delivery delays and wasted resources. To
mitigate these problems, the TopKontrol project aims to develop a system prototype capable of
tracking and monitoring essential features of the packaging production line, including rotations,
speed, temperature, humidity, and cardboard defects. The monitoring system will enable prompt
maintenance actions, reducing delays and costs, and ensuring seamless production processes.</p>
      <p>The project is relevant for the information system community as the amount of data generated
by every single installation is so high to require a careful design of the architecture in order to
provide real-time guarantees for the operators and a satisfying experience for the management
of the company.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Expected results</title>
      <p>As a final outcome, the TopKontrol project is going to be composed of a set of interconnected
software components processing data coming from IoT devices.</p>
      <p>More in detail, there will be a component able to collect Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) packets
coming from sensors associated to the die cutters. Additionally, a vision-based software
component will deal with the real-time analysis of produced cardboard. Production process-related
information will produce a production quality assessment. Finally, dashboards are going to be
developed to provide end-users, i.e., operators and manager, easy access to information related
to productions.</p>
      <p>
        The final system is expected to improve the overall production quality from the perspectives
of both die cutter and cardboard manufacturers. In particular, the die cutter manufacturer will
be able to optimize the die cutter production according to the data gathered by the system and
the simulated ones according to a Digital Twin (DT) model, focusing on the parts more prone
to damaging with usage, increasing their products’ useful life and reducing maintenance costs.
From the perspective of the cardboard manufacturer, the benefits of the presented product
would be various:
• Production operator may have live feedback for each individual cardboard.
• Every batch of cardboard sheets can be associated with a quality certificate.
• Realize an accurate custom Digital Twin model of the die cutter.
• Feedback on the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of every die cutter, based on the Digital
Twin and Machine Learning techniques (including, but not limited to, deep convolutional
neural networks for anomaly detection) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ], will be provided in order to avoid any major
interruption to the production caused by a malfunctioning.
• Optimization of the production based on current environmental conditions, i. e.
temperature and humidity can vastly influence the outcome of a certain cardboard batch.
• Extract from data various Key Performance Indicators (KPI) of the ongoing and past
production.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Current project results</title>
      <p>We divide the discussion of the current results in two parts. In the first part we will describe the
current system prototype and each component within the system in more details. Then, in the
second part we will present a preliminary and ongoing work about designing and implementing
a DT model of a die cutter.</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>4.1. Architecture</title>
        <p>Figure 1 presents the architecture of the experimental prototype of the system, where the
machine installation block components are located close to a die machine and the remaining
components are cloud-deployed software components.</p>
        <p>The machine installation block includes two primary data sources, a BLE sensor and an
industrial camera. The BLE sensor is directly attached to the die cutter, while the industrial
camera points to the cardboard coming out of the die machine (see Figure 2). The data collected
by these sources is then stored in a local database through two distinct PCs and subsequently
sent to a cloud server.</p>
        <p>Figure 1 also displays two dashboards: the operator dashboard, which presents data from
local storage, and the central dashboard, which provides a comprehensive overview of data
gathered from multiple die machines.</p>
        <p>
          It is worth noting that the system prototype described in this section has been patented, so
its specific design and capabilities are protected under patent law [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <sec id="sec-4-1-1">
          <title>4.1.1. Monitoring process</title>
          <p>The monitoring process is a crucial element of the TopKontrol project. To make the die cutter
smart, an Industrial IoT (IIoT) BLE programmable chip is mounted on it, and its unique MAC
address is used to identify the smart die cutter when broadcasting packets via Bluetooth.</p>
          <p>The BLE chip collects data on the die cutter’s revolution speed per second, as well as the
temperature and humidity of the surrounding environment. The chip’s firmware has been
customized to compute some of this data, and a heuristic has been implemented to conserve
the chip’s battery life. The chip only turns on and starts data streaming when the smart die
cutter is installed on the die machine during the efective cardboard manufacturing production
process. This results in a more eficient and sustainable chip for tracking.</p>
          <p>Data from the smart die cutters is collected by monitoring software running on a specific
PC (referred to as PC sensor in Figure 1). The main function of this software is to collect die
cutter usage data from the BLE chip, which is then stored in the local database and used by
other components of the system for further analysis.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-1-2">
          <title>4.1.2. Quality control process</title>
          <p>
            Another crucial component of the TopKontrol project is the one related to the quality control
process. An industrial video camera is mounted alongside the production line with light
projectors that enhance the lightning conditions and highlight cardboard surface. The camera
acquires high quality frames of the cardboard sheets that pass underneath it at high speed.
Such frames are processed by an inspection process running in a specific PC (dubbed PC
camera in Figure 1) that applies image processing techniques in order to identify the cardboard
features and compare them to the CAD model of the cardboard. CAD models, or engineering
drawings, are an essential element for quality control of the manufactured product. Indeed,
CAD models represent the depictions of products that include geometric as well as textual
information such as measurements [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
            ]. These information represents the quality requirements
that the manufactured product need to meet. The developed inspection process first parses
the CAD model to extract the relevant features of the cardboard which will be compared with
the cardboard frame captured by the camera. Cardboard defects detected by the inspection
software ranges from missing cuts in the cardboard to size errors (e.g. width or height). These
defects are then stored to the local database and shown both in the Operator dashboard and in
the Central dashboard.
          </p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-1-3">
          <title>4.1.3. Dashboards</title>
          <p>The Operator Dashboard is a user-friendly tool that consists of a touchscreen interface and
provides the worker with a summary of critical information during a production session.
Typically, the BLE chip is responsible for automatically signaling the start and end of a production
session, and the dashboard receives this information to begin showing data. The Operator
dashboard enables the worker to manually indicate the start and end of the production session if
needed, thus providing full control over the data collection process. The dashboard also presents
a summary of the data collected during the production session, such as the number and type of
errors detected by the system. In addition, the dashboard displays sample images of cardboard
with defects, which can help the operator identify and address issues in the production process.
Finally, the dashboard operates in real-time, thus providing the worker with timely information
to intervene promptly and avoid any potential production issues.</p>
          <p>The Central dashboard is an administrative tool that displays data from various die cutters
and die machines. It provides a centralized location where data on each machine’s history,
monitoring, and quality-related data can be viewed. In the future, important KPIs will also be
displayed. The dashboard is designed to benefit both packaging factory employees and die
cutter manufacturers. On one hand, packaging factory employees can remotely monitor the
productivity of their die cutters and identify any issues with the cardboard being produced.
They can access a list of their die cutters, which allows them to easily track each machine’s
output and identify which machines are underperforming. By having access to this information,
they can take appropriate action to address issues and ensure that the production process runs
smoothly. On the other hand, die cutter manufacturers can use the dashboard to gain insight
into their machines’ usage patterns and identify areas for improvement. By analyzing the data
on the dashboard, they can identify trends, such as which die cutters are being used more
frequently, and which ones are producing the most errors. This information can help them
design better die cutters that meet the needs of their customers and improve the overall quality
of their products.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>4.2. Towards a Die-cutter DT</title>
        <p>
          As part of this project, we are also working on developing a custom die cutter DT using the work
proposed by [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ] and the data sources mentioned in the previous section, with the final goal of
having a model that is capable of both processing real sensor data and and creating simulated
ones to improve overall quality control performances of our system. Although there are several
pre-existing frameworks for DT, their efectiveness might be limited in certain scenarios, as
emphasized by prior works such as [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ]. On the other hand, custom DT solutions such as [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ]
usually focus on simulation aspect of the DT. We intend to devise a custom solution that can
handle real-time data streams without relying only on simulated data (e.g. to update the model’s
internal state). Our approach is especially relevant as we are dealing with machines that are
over 40 years old and cannot be retrofitted with Industry 4.0 technologies. Therefore, we need
to devise a solution that does not interfere with the original machines, treating them as black
boxes. Put diferently, we are using a wrapper approach, similar to the one used for legacy
information systems over 20 years ago with distributed object technologies, as discussed in [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ].
Having a custom DT solution could also potentially provide us the full control of the model and
a direct interaction with the die cutter, allowing us to fine-tune its performance and monitor
its health in real time. As theorized by [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ], our DT will expose support for both synchronous
and asynchronous Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), taking all necessary data from
the database of current and past aggregated production data. Using the synchronous API, it
would be possible to access the internal status of the twin, e.g., if the die-cutter is currently
mounted to the die machine or not, its current real time cutting performances and its RUL. On
the other hand, the asynchronous API would be used by the DT of the die cutter to trigger
alarms that are displayed in real time to the operator dashboard if a noticeable amount of
production errors is detected or if the simulation part of the model predicts a short amount of
RUL. These functionalities will be used in the future by the operator dashboard, in order to
display to the die-machine operator relevant data for the current production, or by the control
dashboard to show historical performances of a die-cutter and its RUL.
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Concluding remarks</title>
      <p>In this paper, we presented the TopKontrol project, a system that aims to improve the overall
production quality in the cardboard industry by collecting usage data from die cutters and
analyzing the produced cardboard using image processing techniques. The system is composed
of a set of interconnected software components, including a BLE beacon that is directly attached
to the die cutter, a vision-based software component for real-time analysis of produced cardboard,
and dashboards to access production-related information. The proposed system is expected
to bring several benefits to die cutter and cardboard manufacturers, such as the optimization
of die cutter production, certification of cardboard quality, and avoidance of major production
interruptions caused by malfunctioning die cutters. Future work will focus on the development
and implementation of advanced ML algorithms to enhance the quality assessment of cardboard
and provide more accurate predictions of the RUL of die cutters. Another potential future
work of the TopKontrol project is the integration with the Computer Numerical Control (CNC)
systems of the equipment in the factory. By leveraging the data collected from the sensors and
the analysis of the cardboard defects, the system could provide feedback to the CNC systems to
adjust the cutting parameters and improve the quality of the cardboard produced, leading to
further improvements in the quality and cost of the final product.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Kagermann</surname>
          </string-name>
          , W.-D. Lukas, W. Wahlster,
          <article-title>Industrie 4.0: Mit dem internet der dinge auf dem weg zur 4. industriellen revolution</article-title>
          ,
          <source>VDI nachrichten 13</source>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
          <fpage>2</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Popkova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y. V.</given-names>
            <surname>Ragulina</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. V.</given-names>
            <surname>Bogoviz</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Industry 4.0: Industrial revolution of the 21st century</article-title>
          , volume
          <volume>169</volume>
          , Springer,
          <year>2019</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>VanDerHorn</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S. Mahadevan,
          <article-title>Digital twin: Generalization, characterization and implementation, Decision support systems 145 (</article-title>
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>113524</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Shafto</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Modeling</surname>
          </string-name>
          , simulation,
          <source>information technology &amp; processing roadmap</source>
          ,
          <source>National Aeronautics and Space Administration</source>
          <volume>32</volume>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>38</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Kitain</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Digital twin-the new age of manufacturing, Online blog originally posted on Seebo (</article-title>
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Pires</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <source>Digital twin in industry 4</source>
          .
          <article-title>0: Technologies, applications and challenges</article-title>
          , in: INDIN, volume
          <volume>1</volume>
          , IEEE,
          <year>2019</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>721</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>726</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Leotta</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Mathew</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Mecella</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Monti</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Supporting zero defect manufacturing through cloud computing and data analytics: The case study of electrospindle 4.0</article-title>
          , in: Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops:
          <article-title>CAiSE 2022 International Workshops</article-title>
          , Leuven, Belgium, June 6-10,
          <year>2022</year>
          , Proceedings, Springer,
          <year>2022</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>119</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>125</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Zonta</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Da</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Costa</given-names>
            , R. da Rosa Righi,
            <surname>M. J. de Lima</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. S. da Trindade,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G. P.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Predictive maintenance in the industry 4.0: A systematic literature review</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Computers &amp; Industrial Engineering</source>
          <volume>150</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>106889</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Addepalli</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Remaining useful life prediction using deep learning approaches: A review</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Procedia manufacturing 49</source>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>81</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>88</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>A. De Franceschi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Leotta</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mecella</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Visani, System for monitoring cutting devices in a packaging production line, U.S. Patent US20220371297A1</article-title>
          , Nov.
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Scheibel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Mangler</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S. Rinderle-Ma,
          <article-title>Extraction of dimension requirements from engineering drawings for supporting quality control in production processes</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Computers in Industry</source>
          <volume>129</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>103442</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Catarci</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Firmani</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Leotta</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Mandreoli</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Mecella</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Sapio</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A conceptual architecture and model for smart manufacturing relying on service-based digital twins</article-title>
          , in: ICWS, IEEE,
          <year>2019</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>229</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>236</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Shankar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Gvk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Ramanathan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Bapat</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Knowledge-based Digital Twin for Oil and Gas 4.0 Upstream Process: A System Prototype</article-title>
          , in: IoTaIS,
          <year>2022</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>344</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>350</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Mecella</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Pernici</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Designing wrapper components for e-services in integrating heterogeneous systems</article-title>
          ,
          <source>VLDB Journal 10</source>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          )
          <fpage>2</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>15</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>