<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Digital Services Promoting Compliance, Integrity and Anti- Corruption the Case of Brazilian Cofen and Regional Nursing Councils System's Integrity Program</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Marcelo Persegona</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Betânia Santos</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Matheus Cruz</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Neyson Freire</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Bruno Ferola</string-name>
          <email>brunoferola@hotmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Flavia Bernardini</string-name>
          <email>fcbernardini@ic.uff.br</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Julia Persegona</string-name>
          <email>julia.marcolino@idp.com.br</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Brazilian Federal Nursing Council (Cofen)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Brasilia</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="BR">Brazil)</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Institute of Computing, Federal Fluminense University (UFF)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Niterói</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="BR">Brazil</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>PB Compliance</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>São Paulo</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="BR">Brazil</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>Research and Development Institute (IDP)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Brasília</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="BR">Brazil</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2023</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>0000</fpage>
      <lpage>0002</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The Program of Integrity is a set of ethical guidelines and procedures aimed at ensuring transparency, accountability, and responsibility in the public and private sectors. This concept emerged in response to widespread corruption, fraud, and unethical practices that were becoming increasingly common in the business world. The Program of Integrity is important for Brazil because it helps to build trust in the government and private sector. This program sets clear standards for conduct, provides a framework for reporting potential violations, and establishes a set of consequences for individuals or organizations that engage in unethical practices. The goal of this program is to promote a culture of ethics, integrity, and transparency in all aspects of Brazilian society. The use of technology, specifically information technology (IT), can help to increase transparency and reduce the risk of corruption. For example, IT can be used to create systems that monitor and track government spending, as well as provide instant access to information and data to the public. This can help to reduce the opportunity for corruption and increase accountability in government.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Integrity</kwd>
        <kwd>Compliance</kwd>
        <kwd>Transparency</kwd>
        <kwd>Management and Public Governance Program</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The Anti-Corruption Plan: Diagnosis and Actions of the Federal Government was launched
in Brazil on December 9, 2020. It is a product of the work of the Interministerial Committee
to Combat Corruption (CICC). This document aims to “structure and implement actions to
improve mechanisms for prevention, detection and accountability for acts of corruption within
the competence of the Federal Executive Power” in the period between 2020 and 2025. This is an
unprecedented experience in Brazil due to its scope, ambition and even the public visibility that
was sought to give an efort to systematize a wide range of anti-corruption actions. 142 actions
were proposed, 42 normative and 100 non-normative. They were also classified according to
their final dimension: 78 for prevention, 34 for detection and 30 for accountability. Despite
its uniqueness in Brazil, the elaboration of national anti-corruption plans or strategies has
become a common practice in the international sphere, having already occurred in more than 70
countries [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. Recommended by international organizations such as the UN Ofice on Drugs and
Crime (UNODC) and the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), these plans were also
discussed by the Group of 20 (G-20), which developed the High Principles for the Development
and Implementation of National Anti- Corruption Strategies [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. Therefore, the institutions of
the Brazilian Federal Public Administration have to adapt and adopt the measures proposed in
the Anti-Corruption Plan. One of these bodies is Cofen, the Federal Nursing Council, which
systematized all these actions in an Integrity Program.
It becomes a mistake to try to copy integrity mechanisms and already-made Integrity Systems.
It was based on this premise that the Cofen and Regional Nursing Councils System designed and
implemented its Integrity Program, based on the definition of general lines of what it should
contain and, specifically, what should be done. Thus, the objective of this work is to present
how the planning, execution, monitoring and results obtained with the integrity, compliance
and anti-corruption actions at Cofen, Federal Council of Nursing, were carried out.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>3. Conclusion</title>
      <p>The figure 1 presents the summary of the LGPD adequacy assessment obtained by Cofen in
comparison to other organizations. Cofen had a higher average than the other organizations in
all evaluated dimensions.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Koehler</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The story of the foreign corrupt practices act</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Ohio St. LJ</source>
          <volume>73</volume>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
          <fpage>929</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Goyal</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Anti-corruption agenda of the G20: Bringing order without law</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Technical Report</source>
          , Working Paper,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>