<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Workshop on Empowering Education with LLMs - the Next-Gen Interface and Content Generation</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Steven Moore</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Richard Tong</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Anjali Singh</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Zitao Liu</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Xiangen Hu</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Yu Lu</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Joleen Liang</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Chen Cao</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Hassan Khosravi</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Paul Denny</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Chris Brooks</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>John Stamper</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Carnegie Mellon University</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Pittsburgh</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Pennsylvania</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>United States</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Carnegie Learning</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Pittsburgh</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Pennsylvania</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>United States</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>University of Michigan</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ann Arbor</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Michigan</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>United States</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Jinan University</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Guangdong Province</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>China</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>University of Memphis</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Memphis Tennessee</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>United States</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Beijing Normal University</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Beijing</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>China</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Squirrel AI Learning</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Shanghai</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>China</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>University of Sheffield</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Sheffield</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>United Kingdom</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>University of Queensland</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>St Lucia</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Queensland</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Australia</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>University of Auckland</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Auckland</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>New Zealand</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>The first annual workshop on Empowering Education with LLMs - the Next-Gen Interface and
Content Generation took place at the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in
Education in 2023. This workshop exposed attendees to the ample opportunities of leveraging Large
Language Models (LLMs) in educational contexts, including instructors, researchers, learning
engineers, and many other roles. Participants from a wide range of backgrounds and prior knowledge
on LLMs benefitted and contributed to this workshop, as this space draws on work from education,
natural language processing, learning analytics, data mining, machine learning, and many more fields.
Additionally, as the endless opportunities of LLMs for education involves many stakeholders
(students, instructors, researchers, instructional designers, etc.), multiple viewpoints helped to inform
what applications might be useful, new and better ways to assess the outputs of LLMs, and spark
potential collaboration efforts between attendees. We ultimately demonstrated that LLMs are actively
being used for many educational applications currently and how everyone can make use of them for
their own purposes. Participants were able to gain hands-on experience using existing tools, creating
their own LLM-enhanced applications, and taking part in discussing the next challenges and
opportunities in the LLM space. Our workshop attendees were interested in scaling the generation of
instructional and assessment content using LLMs, ways of assessing the outputs of LLMs, and novel
use cases of applying LLMs in educational contexts.</p>
      <p>Prior to the workshop, we encouraged potential participants to submit papers related to AI in
education, LLMs, and educational content creation. Papers covered various aspects of human-AI
collaborations in educational content creation. They discussed challenges that arise in effectively
helping students act on revisions when both students and AI review and edit student-generated
content. Many discussed the need to explore how AI can aid students in consistently producing
high-quality educational contributions. Amidst the challenges of collaborative content creation
between humans and AI in education, numerous opportunities exist to enhance accessibility and
learning benefits for students. Several of them looked at how students can collaborate with large
language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT or GPT-4 to enhance assessment questions or
explanations. These approaches facilitate content improvement and encourage critical thinking as
students evaluate model suggestions, including recommended alternatives, and recognize model
limitations. Finally, several papers discussed the potential pitfalls and problems with LLMS. For
instance, since LLMs are trained on extensive human-generated data, they are susceptible to biases
like humans. Relying solely on automatically generated content in education risks perpetuating such
biases. To mitigate this, a human-in-the-loop strategy involving students and instructors is crucial.
This approach moderates biases and enhances the performance of generative models for educational
suitability.</p>
      <p>The workshop focus was aimed at uniting researchers and practitioners from both academia and
industry to delve into the potential of LLMs as interfaces for communication and collaboration within
human-in-the-loop systems. The workshop's objectives encompass several key areas related to AI in
education. The utilization of Large Language Models (LLMs) within educational contexts. The
creation and assessment of educational content facilitated by the assistance of LLMs. The
collaborative generation of educational partnerships, where either humans or AI stand to gain the
most. Exploration of ethical considerations linked to employing LLMs as communication interfaces
within educational environments. Development of effective and standardized user interfaces tailored
for LLM-based educational systems. The amalgamation of Crowdsourcing and Learnersourcing
strategies in conjunction with LLMs.</p>
      <p>We began with introductions and an overview of the LLM in education landscape, to bring all
participants, regardless of background, up to speed on the concept and latest trends. Two invited
speakers then gave presentations and demos to highlight real world applications of LLMs in two
different educational contexts. We then had a panel of four experts answer a series of questions
relating to the challenges of opportunities of LLM-based applications. Following that, we had a final
invited speaker give a presentation regarding the generation of explanations using LLMs. Next we had
participant presentations, where the in-person attendees of the accepted submissions presented their
research for roughly fifteen minutes each. We also had multiple virtual presentations from participants
that could not attend in person, the videos of these can be found here:
https://ai4ed.cc/workshops/aied2023. Following that, we held a thirty-minute break that included
coffee and light snacks. From there, we then had an hour-and-a-half mini-hackathon, where
participants worked with one another to construct a prototype of an LLM-based educational
application of their own. Participants then engaged in a discussion around the challenges,
opportunities, and future of LLMs in education. The workshop concluded with a summary of the
day’s events, core challenges and opportunities we addressed in the discussions, and an emphasis on
future collaborations.</p>
      <p>Once the workshop was concluded, we began working on publishing the accepted papers as part of
a workshop proceedings. Additionally, we hope the interactions during the workshop will result in the
adoption of LLM-based educational applications for many of the participants, whether that be using
one of the tools, the discussed datasets, or creating their own applications in their own platforms and
courses. Ultimately, we want to keep the workshop participants involved and promote collaboration
between attendees. We hope to repeat this workshop, as we strive to make this become part of the
basis for a community of researchers who are interested in educational applications of LLMs.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>