<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>IJCAI Workshop “Interactions between Analogical Reasoning and Machine Learning”</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Macau</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>China</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Editors Miguel Couceiro (University of Lorraine, CNRS, Loria) Stergos Afantenos (Université Paul Sabatier, IRIT) Pierre-Alexandre Murena, Hamburg University of Technology</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>IARML 2023</p>
      <p>This volume contains the proceedings of the 2nd edition of the workshop IARML@IJCAI.
The first edition took place at IJCAI-ECAI 2022, Vienna, Austria 1 that counted with the
participation of several colleagues from Europe, America and Asia. This year we expanded
our audience to the 5 continents. As in the 1st edition, we will organize a Springer special
volume in Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence .</p>
      <p>Analogical reasoning is a remarkable human capability used to solve hard reasoning tasks.
It consists in transferring knowledge from a source domain to a diferent, but somewhat
similar, target domain by relying simultaneously on similarities and diferences. Analogies
have preoccupied humanity at least since antiquity (cf. the works of Atistotle, Theon of
Smyrna, among others) and have been in more recent years characterized as being “at the
core of cognition” (Hofstadter 2001) showing that they permeate almost every aspect of
cognition (Hofstadter and Sanders, 2013). According to Hofstadter and the Fluid Analogies
Research Group, analogy making is intimately related with abstraction and the search of a
“common essence”, which can lead to deep understanding of any concept or situation.</p>
      <p>Analogies have been tackled from various angles. Traditionally, analogical proportions,
i.e., statements of the form “A is to B as C is to D”, are the basis of analogical inference. They
contributed to case-based reasoning and to multiple machine learning tasks such as
classification, decision making and machine translation with competitive results. Also, analogical
extrapolation can support dataset augmentation (analogical extension) for model learning,
especially in environments with few labeled examples. Other approaches include the
Structure Mapping approach of Dedre Gentner that is based on logical descriptions (in the form
of predicate-argument structures) of two domains: the more relational similarity one has
between the two domains, the more analogous they can be considered.</p>
      <p>Recent neural techniques, such as representation learning, enabled eficient approaches
to detecting and solving analogies in domains where symbolic approaches had shown their
limits. Transformer architectures trained using vast amounts of data have given us Large
Language Models (LLMs) such as Chat-GPT, seem to exhibit human-like conversational and
analogy making capacities (Webb et al. 2022). However, better evaluation metrics are needed
in order to measure elusive concepts such as intelligence and understanding (Mitchel 2023).
More than ever we need to understand the role that analogies, abstraction and similarities
between concepts play in language and cognition.</p>
      <p>The purpose of this series of workshops is to bring together AI researchers at the cross
roads of machine learning, natural language processing, knowledge representation and
reasoning, who are interested in the various applications of analogical reasoning in machine learning
or, conversely, of machine learning techniques to improve analogical reasoning.</p>
      <p>The contributions to this 2nd edition of IARML@IJCAI focused on the following:
• Machine learning for analogical reasoning: representation learning, Advanced similarity
measures, analogical transfer, neuro-symbolic models for analogical inference.
• Analogical reasoning for machine learning: classification using analogical reasoning,
case-Based Reasoning, creativity and data augmentation.
• Analogies in Large Language Models (LLMs): probing LLMs for analogies, evaluating
capacities of LLMs for analogies, creativity in language through analogies.</p>
      <p>Copyright © 2023 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).</p>
      <p>1https://iarml2022-ijcai-ecai.loria.fr/</p>
      <p>II
• Applications: to visual domains, to Natural Language Processing, etc.</p>
      <p>The workshop welcomed submissions of research papers on all topics at the intersection
of analogical reasoning and machine learning. The submissions were subjected to a strict
double-blind reviewing process that resulted in the selection of five original contributions
and one invited talk, in addition to the two plenary keynote talks.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Plenary talks:</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Invited talks:</title>
      <p>Accelerating Innovation and Discovery through Analogy Mining (Dafna Shahaf)
Similarity measures at the core of analogical transfer and case-based prediction
(MarieJeanne Lesot)
Multimodal Analogical Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs (Ningyu Zhang, Lei Li, Xiang
Chen, Xiaozhuan Liang, Shumin Deng)</p>
      <p>IARML@IJCAI’23 takes place on August 21, 2022 in Macau (China), and we are truly
thankful to the IJCAI workshop chairs for their help in the organization of this event. We
are greatly indebt to the scientific committee for their reviews and suggestions for improving
the accepted contributions.</p>
      <p>Miguel Couceiro</p>
      <p>Stergos Afantenos</p>
      <p>Pierre-Alexandre Murena</p>
      <p>III</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Organising Committee</title>
        <p>Miguel Couceiro (University of Lorraine, CNRS, Loria, FR)
Stergos Afantenos (Université Paul Sabatier, IRIT, FR)
Pierre-Alexandre Murena (Hamburg University of Technology, DE)</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Scientific Committee</title>
        <p>Fadi Badra (Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, LIMICS, FR)
Nelly Barbot (Université de Rennes 1, IRISA, FR)
Tarek R. Besold (DEKRA DIGITAL, Eindhoven University of Technology, NL)
Myriam Bounhas (LARODEC-ISGT, TU, UAE)
Adrien Coulet (Inria Paris, FR)
Sebastien Destercke (CNRS, Université de Technologie de Compiegne, Heudiasyc, FR)
Claire Gardent (University of Lorraine, CNRS, LORIA, FR)
Eyke Hullermeier (University of Munich, DE)
Mehdi Kaytoue (Infologic, FR)
David B. Leake (Indiana University, USA)
Yves Lepage (Waseda University, JA)
Jean Lieber (University of Lorraine, CNRS, LORIA, FR)
Esteban Marquer (University of Lorraine, CNRS, LORIA, FR)
Laurent Miclet (Université de Rennes, FR)
Pierre Monnin (Orange, FR)
Amedeo Napoli (University of Lorraine, CNRS, LORIA, FR)
Henri Prade (CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, IRIT, FR)
Irina Rabkina (OXY Occidental College, USA)
Steven Schockaert (Cardif University, IR)</p>
        <p>IV
Some Perspectives on Similarity Learning for Case-Based Reasoning and Analogical
Transfer</p>
        <p>Fadi Badra, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Esteban Marquer and Miguel Couceiro . . .
Can LLMs solve generative visual analogies?</p>
        <p>Shrey Pandit, Gautam Shrof, Ashwin Srinivasan and Lovekesh Vig . . . . . .
VII
1
3
16
30
34</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>