<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>SSN MLRG at ImageCLEFmedical Caption 2023: Automatic Concept Detection and Caption Prediction using ConceptNet and Vision Transformer</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Sheerin Sitara Noor Mohamed</string-name>
          <email>sheerinsitaran@ssn.edu.in</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Kavitha Srinivasan</string-name>
          <email>kavithas@ssn.edu.in</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of CSE, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Kalavakkam - 603110</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IN">India</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>An automatic image captioning attains tremendous advancement in the last few years. However most of the medical data are, publicly unavailable and exist in unstructured and unlabelled format are real challenges in developing the medical system. To address these issues, ImageCLEF forum is conducting many tasks on the medical domain from 2016 onwards. This year one of the tasks is medical concept detection and caption prediction. For this task, our team has proposed two techniques using ConceptNet and Vision Transformer (ViT). The concept detection models are developed using multi-label classification and resulted the F1score and secondary F1-score as 0.464 and 0.860 respectively. The caption prediction models are implemented using Vision Transformer (ViT), which resulted a BERT and CLIPScore of 0.544 and 0.687 respectively. ImageCLEF, caption prediction, concept detection, ViT, multilabel classification, image captioning</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Images are extensively used for conveying enormous amounts of information over internet and
social media and hence there is an increasing demand for image data analytics for designing efficient
information processing systems. This leads to the development of systems with capability to
automatically analyze the scenario contained in the image and to express it in meaningful natural
language sentences. Image caption generation is an integral part of many useful systems and
applications such as visual question answering, surveillance video analysis, video captioning, automatic
image retrieval, assistance for visually impaired people, biomedical imaging, robotics and so on. A
good captioning system is capable of highlighting the contextual information in the image similar to
human cognitive system. In the recent years, several techniques for automatic caption generation in
images have been proposed that can effectively solve many computer vision challenges related to
medical image captioning. The different types of medical imaging modalities are Computed
Tomography (CT), X-Ray (XR), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Positron Emission Tomography
(PET), angiogram, mammogram and ultrasound. The ImageCLEF forum [1] is conducting various tasks
related to medical images such as caption prediction, concept detection, Tuberculosis (TB) type
detection, Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) detection, TB severity score calculation, CT report generation
️© 2023 Copyright for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
and Visual Question Answering (VQA) from 2016 onwards. In this, we have participated in concept
detection and caption prediction tasks during the current year.</p>
      <p>In concept detection and caption prediction tasks [2], the dataset given by ImageCLEF consists of
different modalities such as CT, XR, PET, angiogram and ultrasound images. The concepts and captions
corresponds to these images are created by medical annotator from PubMED articles and Unified
Medical Language System (UMLS) terms. Finally, these datasets are validated and verified by medical
domain experts. These datasets are used to develop concept detection and caption prediction model
using suitable techniques and evaluated performance metrics, are discussed in the following paragraphs.</p>
      <p>The concept detection approaches are: information retrieval [3] and multi-label classification
approaches. Among these approaches, multi-label classification using ConceptNet [4] are used for this
task execution. The multi-label classification approach (model 1) is chosen because it has an ability to
find conditional dependencies between the labels and the independence between the labels are
computed based on the specific condition. The caption prediction techniques are grouped into, (i).
Techniques which performs both image and test processing like Visual Transformers (ViT) [5], (ii).
Combination of techniques for image processing and text processing using deep learning techniques
[6]. Among the techniques, ViT is chosen because it can be applied to low-level vision, segmentation,
and multi-modality.</p>
      <p>The performance metrics given by ImageCLEF for evaluating concept detection and caption
prediction tasks are: F1 Score [7], BiLingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) [8], Bilingual Evaluation
Understudy (BLEURT) [9] score, Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE) [10],
Metric for Evaluation of Translation with Explicit Ordering (METEOR) [11], Consensus-based Image
Description Evaluation (CIDEr) [12], Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluation (SPICE) [13],
CLIPScore [14] and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) Score [15].
Among these, except F1-score, all other performance metrics are used to evaluate the results of caption
prediction tasks.</p>
      <p>The remaining part of the paper are discussed with following subsections. In Section 2, the concept
detection and caption prediction tasks and datasets are discussed. The design of the proposed system is
explained in Section 3. A brief summary about the implementation, result and the evaluation of all runs
for both tasks are given in Section 4 and, conclusion and future work is summarized at the end.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Task and Dataset Description</title>
      <p>In this section, two sub tasks of image captioning and given datasets are discussed. The two sub
tasks includes, ImageCLEF concept detection and caption prediction.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>2.1 ImageCLEF Concept Detection and Caption Prediction Task</title>
      <p>The automatic concept detection and caption prediction are identifying the presence and location
of relevant concepts in a large corpus of medical images. Based on the visual image content, this sub
task provides the building blocks for the scene understanding step by identifying the individual
components from which captions are composed. The concepts can be further applied for context-based
image and information retrieval purposes. On the basis of the concept vocabulary detected in the first
sub task as well as the visual information of their interaction in the image, participating systems are
tasked with composing coherent captions for the entirety of an image. In this step, rather than the mere
coverage of visual concepts, detecting the interplay of visible elements is crucial for strong
performance.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>2.2 ImageCLEF Concept Detection and Caption Prediction dataset</title>
      <p>The concept detection and caption prediction datasets comprises of training set, validation set and
test set and it is represented in terms of number of images, concepts and captions in Table 1. The number
of images are equally distributed as 75%, 12.5% and 12.5% for training set, validation set and test set
for both datasets. In concept detection dataset, each image corresponds to one or more concept IDs and
each concept ID represents one concept names. In caption prediction dataset, each image corresponds
to only one caption.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>3. System Design</title>
      <p>The system design of the proposed concept detection and caption prediction tasks are shown in
Figure 1 and 2. In Figure 1, multilabel classification based concept detection models are developed
based on images, concept IDs and concept names in the training phase and, the generated model is
validated by detecting the concept for the radiology images in the test set. In Figure 2, caption
prediction models are developed using ViT, based on the radiology images and captions in the training
phase. The generated caption prediction model is validated by predicting the caption for the medical
images in the test set.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>3.1 Concept Detection</title>
      <p>The concept detection model is developed by multi-label classification using ConceptNet [4]. The
multi-label classification system predicts all the suitable concepts which has probability value greater
than criterion value for each image in the test set. In the training phase, based on the frequency, the
high-level semantic type on the Top-100 concepts are extracted. Then image features are extracted using
ConceptNet and mapped with respective concepts in the training phase. For this, all layers except the
last layer in ConceptNet is freeze so weights remain same throughout the training and only the weights
from added layers updates gradually. Then global average pooling, dense layer with sigmoid activation
function are added after the last layer which predicts the probability value for each image. The global
average pooling used in this model creation acts as a great alternative for Convolutional Neural network
(CNN) because it generates the one feature map for each corresponding concept category. The number
of nodes in the dense layer is maintain to be equal to the number of concept names then only each node
in this layer generates the probability value for each concept with respect to the image. Among the
probability value, the concept which has probability value greater than criterion value is considered as
the predicted concept. Moreover, the model is fine-tuned by minimizing the mean square error between
the predicted and ground truth value. Then in the testing phase, the generated model is evaluated for
radiology images in the test set which detects one or more concepts for each images.</p>
      <p>The concepts extracted for test set under different criteria are combined by (i). union of union (i.e.,
merging list of concepts from two results), (ii). Intersection of intersection (i.e., merging the common
concepts from two results). Regarding the training process, these models were trained during 10 epochs,
using the Adam optimizer with a learning rate of 10−4. These models also used the “2 Phases” strategy,
where the backbone layers are frozen for 5 epochs and then unfroze them for the remaining epochs. The
best model is saved based on the lowest validation loss and its system design is shown in Figure 1.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>3.2 Caption Prediction</title>
      <p>The caption prediction system is developed using Vision Transformer (ViT). Because ViT uses
selfattention mechanism and it derives information from whole image. This pre-trained transformer based
model generates the caption based on the context of the image. The system design is shown in Figure 2
for better understanding. The encoder in ViT receives as input an image divided into patches of 16×16
pixels. The decoder receives the ground-truth caption as input (i.e., training is done using teacher
forcing) and the encoder hidden states as inputs to the cross attention layers. The model is trained
autoregressively for next token prediction using causal (or unidirectional) self-attention, which means
that a given token can only attend to previous tokens. The model was implemented using the Vision
Encoder Decoder class from the Hugging Face Transformers library and chose a tiny Data-efficient
image Transformer (DeiT) pretrained on ImageNet for the encoder. For the decode, leverage pretrained
weights from the Distilled-GPT2, a distilled version of the GPT-2 architecture are used. This model is
initially trained for 20 epochs, and then for an additional 20 epochs starting from the checkpoint with
the lowest validation loss. The AdamW optimiser with an initial learning rate of 5×10−5, linearly
decayed are chosen. Due to limitations of the computational resources available unable to fine tune the
model using self-critical sequence training.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>4. Experiments and Results</title>
      <p>The hardware and software required for the implementation of concept detection and caption
prediction model includes, (i). Intel i5 processor with NVIDIA GeForce Ti 4800 at 4.3GHZ clock speed,
16GB RAM, Graphical Processing Unit and 2TB disk space, (ii). Linux – Ubuntu 20.04 operating system,
Python 3.7 package with required libraries like tensorflow 2.13.0, torch 2.0, sklearn 0.20, nltk, pickle,
pandas, etc.,</p>
      <sec id="sec-8-1">
        <title>Team Name</title>
        <p>AUEB-NLP-Group
KDE-Lab_Med
VCMI
IUST_NLPLAB
Clef-CSE-GAN-Team
CS_Morgan
SSNSheerinKavitha
closeAI2023
SSN_MLRG</p>
        <p>Among the results, run1 obtained better performance value in terms of F1 score and F1 score manual
and it is italicized in Table 2. From run2, it has been inferred that considering top-100 concepts gives
better result. In concept detection task, we have submitted two successful submissions and achieved
seventh rank in ImageCLEF 2023 Concept Detection task.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-2">
        <title>Run Number</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-3">
        <title>F1-Score</title>
        <p>Among the results, run1 obtained better performance value in terms of F1 score and F1 score manual
and it is italicized in Table 2. From run2, it has been inferred that considering top-100 concepts gives
better result. In concept detection task, we have submitted two successful submissions and achieved
seventh rank in ImageCLEF 2023 Concept Detection task. The overall ranking achieved by top teams
are listed in Table 3.</p>
        <p>The brief description about each run are listed in Table 4. The description about each run are as
follows. In run1, the number of epochs is fixed to be 20, used adam optimizer and maintain learning
rate to be 0.005, batch size is 32. The run2 is same as run1, but the learning rate is reduced to 0.001 and
used Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) optimizer and number of epochs fixed to be 40. From the
results, it has been inferred that run4 achieved better performance value and it is italicized in Table 4.
The overall results show that the lowest learning rate, epochs and SGD gives better result. The overall
ranking achieved by top teams are given in Table 5.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>In this paper, medical concept detection and caption prediction models are developed for
ImageCLEF image captioning task. The concept detection tasks are implemented by multi-label
classification approach by ConceptNet by considering only the top 100 concepts. The caption prediction
task is implemented by ViT. From the results of these models, it has been inferred that multi-label
classification approach using ConceptNet by considering only the top 100 concepts gives better results.
As compared with the best scores given by ImageCLEF, the proposed concept detection model lacks
only by 0.058 and 0.065 in terms of F1-score and F1-score manual respectively. And the proposed
caption prediction model lacks only by 0.098 in terms of BLEU score. In future work, the performance
can be enhanced by Generative Pre-trained Transformer instead of BERT. The overall performance of
the system can be improved by reducing the irrelevant samples, increasing the number of epochs and
maintaining the minimum learning rate.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>6. Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>Our profound gratitude to Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Department of CSE,
for allowing us to utilize the High Performance Computing Laboratory and GPU Server for the
execution of this challenge successfully.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>7. References</title>
      <p>
        [1] Bogdan Ionescu, Henning Müller, Ana-Maria Drăgulinescu, Wen-wai Yim, Asma Ben Abacha,
Neal Snider, Griffin Adams, Meliha Yetisgen, Johannes Rückert, Alba García Seco de Herrera,
Christoph M. Friedrich, Louise Bloch, Raphael Brüngel, Ahmad Idrissi-Yaghir, Henning
Schäfer, Steven A. Hicks, Michael A. Riegler, Vajira Thambawita, Andrea Storås, Pål
Halvorsen, Nikolaos Papachrysos, Johanna Schöler, Debesh Jha, Alexandra-Georgiana Andrei,
Ahmedkhan Radzhabov, Ioan Coman, Vassili Kovalev, Alexandru Stan, George Ioannidis,
Hugo Manguinhas, Liviu-Daniel Ștefan, Mihai Gabriel Constantin, Mihai Dogariu, Jérôme
Deshayes, Adrian Popescu,
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Overview of the ImageCLEF 2023</xref>
        : Multimedia Retrieval in
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Multilinguality</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Multimodality, and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Interaction</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the 14th International</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>Conference of the CLEF Association (CLEF</article-title>
          <year>2023</year>
          ), Springer Lecture Notes in Computer
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>September</surname>
          </string-name>
          18-
          <issue>21</issue>
          ,
          <year>2023</year>
          . [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Johannes</given-names>
            <surname>Rückert</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Asma Ben Abacha, Alba G. Seco de Herrera, Louise Bloch, Raphael
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Overview of ImageCLEFmedical 2023 - Caption Prediction</surname>
          </string-name>
          and Concept Detection, in
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)</source>
          ,
          <source>Thessaloniki, Greece, September 18-21</source>
          ,
          <year>2023</year>
          . [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Thakur</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Mehrotra</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Bansal</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M. Bala.
          <article-title>Analysis and Implementation of the Bray-Curtis</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>in: International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications</source>
          , Springer,
          <year>2019</year>
          ,
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          pp.
          <fpage>117</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>125</lpage>
          . URL: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/
          <fpage>978</fpage>
          -981-13-2354-6_
          <issue>14</issue>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Allot</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Leaman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Islamaj</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Du</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Fang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Lu.</surname>
          </string-name>
          Multi-label classification
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>for biomedical literature: an overview of the BioCreative VII LitCovid Track for COVID-19</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>literature topic annotations</article-title>
          .
          <source>Database</source>
          ,
          <year>2022</year>
          . [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Xia</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Pan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Song</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L. E.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Huang</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Vision transformer with deformable attention</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          4794-
          <fpage>4803</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2022</year>
          . [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Chaubey</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Arora</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>K. B. Raj</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Asha</surname>
            , G. Mishra,
            <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guptav</surname>
            and
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alhassan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Computational</given-names>
            <surname>Intelligence</surname>
          </string-name>
          and Neuroscience,
          <year>2022</year>
          . [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. S. N.</given-names>
            <surname>Mohameda</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Srinivasanb</surname>
          </string-name>
          , SSN MLRG at ImageCLEFmedical caption
          <year>2022</year>
          :
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>learning approaches</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of the working notes of CLEF</source>
          <year>2022</year>
          , Bologna, Italy,
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>September</surname>
          </string-name>
          5 - 8
          <year>2022</year>
          . [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Papineni</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Roukos</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Ward</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhu</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>machine translation</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Computational</given-names>
            <surname>Linguistics</surname>
          </string-name>
          (pp.
          <fpage>311</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>318</lpage>
          ). [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Sellam</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>D. Das</surname>
            and
            <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Parikh</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>BLEURT: Learning robust metrics for text generation</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          arXiv preprint arXiv:
          <year>2004</year>
          .
          <volume>04696</volume>
          . [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          ,
          <article-title>July)</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries</article-title>
          . In Text
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>summarization branches out</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>74</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>81</lpage>
          ). [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Banerjee</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
            .
            <surname>Lavie</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          , June). METEOR:
          <article-title>An automatic metric for MT evaluation with</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>and extrinsic evaluation measures for machine translation</article-title>
          and/or summarization (pp.
          <fpage>65</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>72</lpage>
          ). [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G. O.D.</given-names>
            <surname>Santos</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. L.</given-names>
            <surname>Colombini</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Avila</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>S.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ). CIDEr-R:
          <article-title>Robust consensus-based</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>image description evaluation</article-title>
          .
          <source>arXiv preprint arXiv:2109</source>
          .
          <fpage>13701</fpage>
          . [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Anderson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Fernando</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Johnson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S. Gould,
          <string-name>
            <surname>S.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ). Spice: Semantic propositional
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>image caption evaluation</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Computer Vision-ECCV</source>
          <year>2016</year>
          : 14th European Conference,
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Amsterdam</surname>
          </string-name>
          , The Netherlands,
          <source>October 11-14</source>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          , Proceedings,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Part V</surname>
          </string-name>
          14 (pp.
          <fpage>382</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>398</lpage>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          Springer International Publishing. [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Hessel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Holtzman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Forbes</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. L.</given-names>
            <surname>Bras</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Choi</surname>
          </string-name>
          , (
          <year>2021</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Clipscore: A reference-</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>free evaluation metric for image captioning</article-title>
          .
          <source>arXiv preprint arXiv:2104</source>
          .
          <fpage>08718</fpage>
          . [15] https://iclr.cc/virtual_2020/poster_SkeHuCVFDr.html
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>