<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Information Control Systems &amp; Technologies, September</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Multicriteria Analysis and Markov Chains</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Oleksandr Sharko</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Petr Louda</string-name>
          <email>petr.louda@tul.cz</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Artem Sharko</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Dmitry Stepanchikov</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Katarzyna Ewa Buczkowska</string-name>
          <email>katarzyna.ewa.buczkowska@tul.cz</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Van Su Le</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Kherson National Technical University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Berislavske highway 24, Kherson, 73008</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Kherson State Maritime Academy</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>20, Ushakov Ave, Kherson, 73000</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Lodz University of Technology</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Zeromskiego Street 116, Lodz, 90924</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="PL">Poland</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>Technical University of Liberec</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Studentská 1402/2, Liberec, 461 17</addr-line>
          <country country="CZ">Czech Republic</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2023</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>2</volume>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>23</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The advantages of hybrid intelligent systems are the common objective of the exploited model, the possibility of extension, and adaptation to loads through scaling. A smart system and algorithm for hybrid implementation of criterion evaluation and probabilistic dynamics of slobostructured geopolymer basic characteristics in real time are proposed based on the coupling of Markov chains and multicriteria optimization methods. The advantages of hybrid intelligent systems lie in the overall objective of the proposed model, scalability, and adaptability to workloads through scaling. The computational basis of calculations was the digitalization of technology study and analysis of physical-mechanical properties of geopolymers. The optimal composition of geopolymer structure elements for the given technology of their production was determined. The results of modeling the parameters of target functions have shown the advantages of the digitalization of technologies in the analysis of the physical and mechanical properties of geopolymers. The use of the analytical apparatus of Markov chains allowed us to rank the coefficients of multicriteria optimization and to increase the accuracy of calculations. Hybrid models Multi-criteria optimization, Markov chains, Target function parameters, Coefficient ranking, 0000-0001-5027-2213 (D.Stepanchikov); 0000-0002-6869-1392 (K.Buczkowska); 0000-0002-6350-7189 (S.Le)</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Geopolymers are a new class of building material designed to replace Portland cement. High carbon
dioxide emissions accompany the production process of Portland cement. Modern cement plants
worldwide emit about 1.5 billion tons of CO₂ annually. Geopolymers are becoming an environmentally
friendly alternative to Portland cement. The properties and applications of geopolymers depend on their
chemical structure and the ratio of components.</p>
      <p>The search for the optimum composition of geopolymers with high strength and performance
properties is becoming an urgent problem in construction, architecture, and noise protection structures.
The practical application of the results of studies on estimating geopolymer mixtures with given
physical and mechanical properties is limited to the empirical selection of the composition of
geopolymer components and the establishment of their variation ranges [1-4]. Reaching an extremum
of one of the properties is accompanied by a decrease in the other properties by a particular value.</p>
      <p>EMAIL:
ORCID:
(O.Sharko);
(P.Louda);
(A.Sharko);
0000-0002-0426-2943
(P.Louda);
0000-0002-6350-7189
(A.Sharko);</p>
      <p>2023 Copyright for this paper by its authors.
However, even in this case, the point of optimum formulation is determined with a large margin of
error.</p>
      <p>Information processing based on mathematical modeling of the composition of geopolymer
compositions is related to the selection of solutions in weakly structured problems with quantitative and
qualitative parameters used as input variables and unstructured with qualitative description only.
Considering their significance, collective decision-making based on quantitative and qualitative criteria
is the main direction of research on creating an intelligent system of geopolymer characteristics to
determine the ranking of criteria using Markov chains and subsequent multicriteria optimization. Such
a hybrid model begins as a system using one autonomous method and ends up as a system using another
way. The coupling of experimental results on geopolymer mixture formulation with their processing by
methods of multicriteria optimization and Markov chains form the basis of the present work.</p>
      <p>The authors' main contributions are the following:
• the methodology of complex use of Markov chains for determination of weight coefficients of
multicriteria optimization was proposed;</p>
      <p>• modeling of target function parameters was performed, the results of which revealed the
advantages of digitalization of technologies in the analysis of geopolymers properties;
• based on the results of modeling, a scheme of hybrid implementation of criterion evaluation
and probabilistic dynamics of weakly structured data was proposed.</p>
      <p>The aim of the work is not only to investigate the physical and technological parameters of different
geopolymer compositions but also to simulate these properties using multicriteria Optimisation and
Markov chains.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Literary review</title>
      <p>The scientific field of intelligent material characterization systems using a hybrid implementation of
Markov chains and criteria methods includes a synergistic combination of semantically integrated
technologies defining the architecture and information exchange process and developing
communication between the components.</p>
      <p>In [5-7], discrete Markov chains have been used for strategy development in various industries,
in [8] medical research, [9] coronavirus control, [10] navigation systems, [11] international
relations, [12] student performance evaluation, in [13] in structural transformations.</p>
      <p>Criterion methods are ways of describing alternative solutions in quantitative terms. Each decision
leads to a particular outcome and therefore expresses the effectiveness of the process and its overall
value. In [14] an evaluation of the composition of the main power chains of an asphalt concrete mixture
based on discrete element methods is presented. In [15], a model for quantitative risk assessment of a
structural hierarchical system used in the petrochemical industry is described. The use of fuzzy sets
theory and genetic algorithms for the composition of communication services is presented in [16]. An
optimality criterion-based algorithm for efficient optimization of laminated composite design using
simultaneous resizing and scaling is presented in [17]. An assessment of the weighted effectiveness of
lattice criterion methods is presented in [18]. A hybrid firefly-inspired approach for optimal web
composition is described in [19]. Modeling the use of Markov chains covers a wide class of probabilistic
dynamics, allowing one to trace trends and causes of changes in the properties of one's subject domain.
However, it should be noted that the presented arsenal of Markov chain implementation tools lacks
methodological unity and represents only some aspects that are treated separately and used for different
purposes. Markov chains represent an integrated element of forecasting mechanics based on an
integrated approach with criteria methods.</p>
      <p>The influence of material structure on the mechanical properties of geopolymers obtained using
additive technologies is presented in [20]. Comparative studies using atomic force microscopy, X-ray
spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy in [21], the influence of structure on the
strength properties of geopolymer characteristics in [22]. Optimization of matrix compositions affecting
the mechanical properties of geopolymer composites with short carbon fibers in [23], development of
hybrid geopolymers for structural materials in [24]. The problem of optimizing the composition of
geopolymer mixtures with the help of an intelligent system of multicriteria optimization and Markov
chains is relevant and timely.</p>
      <p>The main multicriteria optimization techniques used in the cited sources are criterion convolution,
main criterion optimization, and sequential concession method. The practical applications of criterion
methods are wide and varied. The main disadvantage of global optimization for all geopolymer
parameters is the high computational complexity of target functions. For most practical optimization
problems, analytical expressions of limiting functions are unknown. Their general patterns, trends, and
possibilities are considered and used in developing the hybrid implementation method.</p>
      <p>The unsolved part of the general problem of building intelligent systems of multicriteria
multiobjective optimization is their equivalence when replacing the original criteria with general
aggregated criteria, i.e., the exclusion of ranking of private criteria by their importance. This
significantly reduces the accuracy of multicriteria optimization evaluation.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Material and Method</title>
      <p>Geopolymers' physical-mechanical and technological properties were used as research materials: their
quantitative values and priority probabilities of the main characteristics that ultimately determine the
weight composition of the mixture components. The technology of geopolymers production, their
formulation properties, chemical composition, and structure are presented, which are the basis of input
information for the study of investigated properties.</p>
      <p>The main constituents of geopolymer are calcined clay, aluminosilicate materials, bentonite, and
kaolin. The local concrete industry in the Czech Republic uses aggregates in the form of fine and coarse
sand. The aggregates smaller than 4.75 mm are considered fine sand, and coarse sand larger than 4.75
mm. The totals in the present work were obtained in crushed form. Most of the particles were
graveltype with particle sizes ranging from 4.0 to 8.0 mm and fine sand with particle diameters of 0.063 mm
to 2.0 mm [3]. Binder is provided České lupkové závody, a.s by commercial name Lk. In preparing the
binder mixture based on the inorganic polymer, five parts by weight of cement and four pieces of
activator are usually used.</p>
      <p>
        The mixtures were prepared by two following steps: (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) To begin with starting materials, a
geopolymer mortar was prepared by mixing metakaolin-based geopolymer materials with an alkaline
solution in a predetermined ratio (liquid to solid) by mechanical stirring for five minutes; (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ) afterward,
the aggregates were added to the geopolymer mortar mixture and the mixture was homogenized by the
mechanical stirring with five minutes. Directly after mixing, the fresh mortar and concrete were poured
into the plastic molds and vibrated for 2 minutes on the vibration table to remove air voids. Specimens
were covered with a plastic bag for 24 hrs after casting. There are two ways to cure these samples:
(i) These samples were cured at room temperature for 3 days after casting. Next, the pieces were
removed from the molds and left in laboratory ambient conditions until the day of the test. The sample
ages for the latter tests were 7, 14, and 28 days.
      </p>
      <p>(ii) All the mixtures were cured in an oven without delay at the specific curing temperature for 24
hr and 48 hr ranging from 60 oC ÷ 90 oC. Samples were molded in the oven after the curing process and
continued at ambient conditions for 2 days.</p>
      <p>The samples prepared with different mixing ratio aggregate content are presented in Table 1.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Methodology</title>
      <p>The algorithm of implementation of multicriteria evaluation and probabilistic dynamics of weakly
structured data developed according to the described methodology is presented in Fig.1.
The algorithm has a cross-sectional structure and consists of a transient probability matrix algorithm
using Markov chains and a criterion approach for determining the optimal geopolymer composition.
Two aspects determine the dynamics of the process: the initial probability distribution and the transition
probability matrix. Markov chains allow prioritizing each physical and mechanical parameter analyzed.
Based on the calculations performed in the first part of the algorithm, we obtain the values of weight
coefficients for each physical-mechanical parameter of the geopolymer. The use of Markov chains
reveals the essence and interrelation of the main physical and mechanical parameters of geopolymers
with the probability of their manifestation under various manifestations of the external environment.
The novelty of Markov chains application is the replacement of equal-step time intervals by a discrete
sequence of states. Markov chains are a powerful tool that provides fundamental reasoning of a decision
on the basis of processing a large number of experimental data, some of which constitute a database of
data obtained with one or another probability. Criterion evaluations are carried out based on Laplace,
Wald, and Hurwitz criteria and additive, multiplicative and complementary multiplicative convolution.
The general cross-validation algorithm takes into account the necessary operations and building blocks
for constructing a hybrid model for determining the optimal geopolymer composition. Hybrid
implementation of Markov chains combined with quantitative multicriteria optimization evaluations
were used as research methods.
The conceptual model of multicriteria decision-making with fuzzy input data provides equality of
weight coefficients of used criteria. The range of mechanical, thermal, and technological properties
variation is determined by setting the extremum of the boundaries of the target values of the
requirements. In this case, the existing methods have not considered the additional values found through
empirical observation of the characteristics, which significantly reduces the effectiveness of
optimization methods for multiple criteria since decision-making occurs under conditions of uncertainty
and risk. Therefore, it is necessary to modernize the multicriteria optimization methods, which consist
of the transition from vector to scalar optimization. This operation manifests convolution functions of
qualitative criteria into a single generalizing one.</p>
      <p>The need to rank the weight coefficients of criteria requires the creation of an intelligent system in
which the weight coefficients of criteria will be determined through the apparatus of Markov chains.
The technology of intelligent systems is considered as an information-computing system with
intelligent support. From these positions, the intelligent system of geopolymer characteristics is
presented as a technical system capable of solving creative problems belonging to this subject area,
which are stored in the knowledge base in the form of a functional semantic network.
When building an intelligent system of geopolymers characteristics, the ability to solve problems by a
declarative description of the condition, control the processes of computation in the dialogue mode, and
synthesize computational algorithms capable of solving poorly formalized problems were taken into
account. The main stages of building an intelligent system of geopolymer characteristics were: work
with quantitative information, mathematical calculations, storage and exchange of information, and
interpretation of results. The sequence of models underlying the intelligent system of geopolymers
characteristics included Markov chains for determining the ranking of criteria, multicriteria
optimization models, and cross-algorithms of their hybrid implementation. When ranking criteria using
Markov chains each state of the parameters characterising the information situation of determining the
mechanical properties of geopolymers for a given recipe for their preparation is assigned a certain
probability, which is written as a line of the state matrix. The matrix of intensities or transitions of the
system describes the wandering of the system over its states. The matrix is compiled so that the sum of
the probabilities in the rows of the matrix is always equal to 1. In analysing the state matrix, all possible
states of the parameters are enumerated with their probabilities, i.e. we are dealing with a stochastic
transition matrix, the set of vectors inside which reflects the values of probabilities between gradations.
These iterations are made for various combinations of parameters. Since the processes of obtaining the
mechanical properties of geopolymers by changing their formulations do not have a constant time
reference, we will use the stages that characterise the successive approximation of the states' approach
to achieving the intended goal as time. In this case, we will replace the time with the step number.</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>A priori information on weakly structured data</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>Quantitative input ranges</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-3">
        <title>Binary relationships within orders</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-4">
        <title>Establishing cause and effect relationships</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-5">
        <title>Finding and analysing solutions</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-6">
        <title>Defining the space</title>
        <p>to be analysed</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-7">
        <title>Establishing baseline factors</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-8">
        <title>Selection of random variables indexed by time</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-9">
        <title>Developing iterative procedures</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-10">
        <title>Defining the trajectory of infomation resources</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-11">
        <title>Establishing transition</title>
        <p>state probabilities</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-12">
        <title>Determining the</title>
        <p>current status</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-13">
        <title>Drawing up a transitional probability matrix</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-14">
        <title>Specifying optimality criteria</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-15">
        <title>Breakdown into feature groups</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-16">
        <title>Calculation of quantitative estimates of parameters</title>
        <p>Probabilistic
dynamics</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-17">
        <title>Laplace criterion</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-18">
        <title>Wald criterion</title>
        <p>Hurwitz criterion
f
o
ino rse
t t
a e
ilza am
rom rap
N
la to
m gn
itp i
o rd a
f o i</p>
        <p>r
no cca ir
e
t
litceo itsno c
Se po</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-19">
        <title>Formation of generalizing functions</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-20">
        <title>Convolution</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-21">
        <title>Type Selection</title>
        <p>Pairing with criterion
assessments
n
o
i
t
c
u
d
o
r
p
g
n
i
t
u
p
m
o</p>
        <p>C</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-22">
        <title>Simulation and event generation</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-23">
        <title>Description of solutions</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-24">
        <title>Interpretation of results</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-25">
        <title>Identification of states</title>
        <p>Making decisions under uncertain and risky conditions begins with constructing a payoff matrix. The
payoff matrix is a simplified formal model of an actual conflict situation. Mathematically, formalisation</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-26">
        <title>Formation of apriori values about trends and information parameters</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-27">
        <title>Result of criterion-based optimisation</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-28">
        <title>Ranking the values in the determined</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-29">
        <title>Constructing an oriented graph</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-30">
        <title>Hybrid implementation</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-31">
        <title>Visualisation of links</title>
        <p>Criteria
evaluations
means that certain rules for the interaction of parties, choices of actions, and specific outcomes for the
selected actions have been developed, and the necessary information is available. The term "payoff
matrix" is synonymous with the term "performance matrix" [25].</p>
        <p>

 q1
 q
R =  2
 
 qm


П1
y11
y21

ym1
П 2
y12
y22</p>
        <p>
ym2





П n
y1n
y2n</p>
        <p>
ymn










where q1,…,qi,…,qm – weight composition of sample components, Π1,…,Πi,…,Πn – analysed
parameters (physical and mechanical, thermophysical, chemical, operational and technological,
economic), δyij – relative deviation of the j-th parameter from the target.</p>
        <p>To determine the element of the matrix, one of the methods used is the estimation of a scalar vector
– the method of selection by arranging objects according to the model. In this case, converting from
estimating a vector to a scalar of the objects is necessary. The functions used in solving the multicriteria
problem as convolution functions of the vector arguments yi = (yi1,…,yij,…, yin) into scalars δyij = f(yi).
Vector argument convolution serves to reduce the number of criteria. Its purpose is to replace the
original criteria with common criteria. The convolution operation is also called aggregation of partial
criteria. The method is applied if private criteria can be ranked in descending order of their importance
so that the importance of each pair of neighboring criteria does not differ significantly. Their
normalization is applied to compensate for the small values of some criteria with large values in other
criteria. The most straightforward scalar function that provides a linear order of objects is the penalty
function, which is formed to the extreme importance of features.</p>
        <p>
          n
f ш ( yi ) =  yij (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          )
        </p>
        <p>
          j=1
where: Under the deviation Δyij from the ideal target by the j-th feature, we understand the absolute
value of the difference Δyij = |yj – cj,extr|, where the ideal target when maximizing the j-th feature is
denoted as cj,extr = yj,max, and when minimizing the j-th feature, as cj,extr = yj,min. The condition to correctly
use function (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ) is to employ a general absolute scale to measure all features.
        </p>
        <p>As for the sample, we want to refer to a class of objects characterized by a general target h = (c1,…,
cj,…, cn). Let us introduce a measure of the overall deviation from the target, which allows finding the
object closest to the sample and ranking the objects based on their distance to the target. Consider a
sample with attributes formed by equality constraints (yj = cj). The deviation of the j-th feature in any
direction from the specified point cj(cj ± Δyj) indicates the extent to which an object deviates from the
target concerning this attribute. Then, the relative deviation of the j-th feature from the target is
determined as,
 yij − c j
 y j,max − c j
yij = 
 yij − c j

 c j − y j,max
; yij  c j ;
; yij  c j .</p>
        <p>
          (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          )
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          )
where i – line number; j – matrix column number.
        </p>
        <p>As parameters, the best values of the analyzed parameters need to be chosen according to the
perspective of the problem being addressed - these can be maximum, minimum, or average values from
the experimental sample. With this approach, the formula will shift the integer quantities about the scale
(0.1). However, with such parameter selection, the corresponding elements of the matrix coincide with
the necessarily observed values, leading to. Using the convolution sum results in the corresponding
feature being lost from the overall evaluation of the object, and using the convolution product will lead
to a reduction to 0. A clear way to avoid such situations is to extend each feature's upper (maximum)
or lower (minimum) limits by the same percentage. Below, each analyzed parameter's maximum
(minimum) values have been increased (decreased) by 1%.</p>
        <p>Scalar optimization requires additional knowledge about the properties of the generalized objective
functions, characteristics scale, and weighting coefficients. Since this knowledge is domain-specific,
the order of objects in an n-dimensional space cannot be explicitly determined. Therefore, it is crucial
to study the influence of the properties of the generalized objective functions, characteristic scales, and
weighting coefficients on the optimization results.</p>
        <p>The following generalizing multicriteria utility functions have been used in theoretical analysis.
Additive Convolution</p>
        <p>n
yi =  jyij
j=1
n
where j – importance (weighting factor) j-th sign,  j = 1 .</p>
        <p>
          j=1
Power multiplicative convolution
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          )
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          )
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          )
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          )
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          )
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          )
Additional multiplicative convolution
The best object is considered to have the minimum values of functions.
        </p>
        <p>Savage (Wald) criterion (minimum-maximum)
Laplace criterion (minimum-minimum)
Hurwitz criterion</p>
        <p>Z L = min min yij</p>
        <p>i j
Z hw = min min yij + (1 −  )maxyij 
i j j</p>
        <p>n
yi =  (yij ) j
j=1
n
yi = 1 −  (1 − jyij )</p>
        <p>j=1
Z v = min maxyij</p>
        <p>i j
where 0 ≤ ρ ≤ 1 – the indicator of pessimism, in the calculations, was taken equal to 0.5.</p>
        <p>The generalized additive function synthesizes the mass index of an object. It reflects the total value
of individual characteristics, taking into account their importance. The direct product function
prioritizes objects with consistent estimates for all indices, reflecting individual indices' homogeneity.
The complementary product function has the opposite property. The advantage of a complementary
product function over other product functions is its ability to accept zero feature values. With direct
product functions, special care is needed to avoid scalar estimates of vectors with a component value
of zero.</p>
        <p>The Savage criterion is a safety criterion, used to achieve maximally guaranteed results under the
worst conditions. It accepts the maximum negative development of the situation, where a selected
strategy avoids both excessive wins and losses. The worst-case option (the strategy of destiny) is taken
into account. It can use when strategy selection errors could lead to catastrophic consequences when
decisions are made only once and cannot be changed in the future.</p>
        <p>The Laplace criterion determines the strategy that maximizes gains in an uncertain state of the
environment. The one with the lowest score according to the Laplace criterion is the best option. This
criterion represents extreme optimism, not taking into account any negative outcomes except for the
best one. This risk level from the negative impact of changes in the external environment is not
considered. It should be noted that situations requiring the application of such a criterion are not limited
only to optimists, who cannot be corrected but also to those who are trapped and must adhere to the
principle of "do or break". The main drawback of this criterion relates to the fact that when finding the
average payoff level, the offsetting effect of small payoffs can occur.</p>
        <p>The Hurwitz criterion guides the selection of recommended solutions based on a range of
characteristic average outcomes between extreme pessimism and unrestrained optimism. The Hurwitz
criterion is related to introducing a weight parameter 0 ≤ ρ ≤ 1, called the pessimism index. The
assumption about the environment's behavior is that for any alternative choice, the worst choice is made
with probability ρ, and the best choice is made with probability (1 – ρ). When ρ = 0 the Hurwitz criterion
coincides with the Laplace criterion at maximum, and when ρ = 1 – with the Wald criterion at
maximum. By using the Hurwitz criterion, we apply more significant information under the conditions
of Wald, Savage, and Laplace. The main drawback of this criterion is that it only considers two
outcomes – the worst and the best.</p>
        <p>Additionally, there is difficulty in specifying a pessimism index, ρ. The assumption is that every
rational decision-maker must select appropriate maximum or minimum strategies. Caution is required.</p>
        <p>The hybrid intelligent system is a set of statistical simulation models in which the qualitative side of
loosely structured problems and performance evaluation of processes for determining the mechanical
properties of geopolymers are solved using Markov chains, while criterion methods are used for
quantitative inference, and the final result best adapts the results of both applications. The quantitative
side of loosely structured tasks and process performance evaluation is solved using Markov chains,
while criterion methods are used for quantitative conclusions, and the final result best adapts the results
of both applications.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Experiment</title>
      <p>Compressive strength testing of mortar was performed as per AS 1012.9 using (Ø46 x 92) mm diameter
cylindrical molds. ASTM C39 was conducted for compressive strength tests of hardened concrete, using
(Ø100 × 200) mm cylinder molds. Three sample cylinders were tested, with the experimental values
averaged.</p>
      <p>The density of geopolymer composite materials was measured according to standard CSN EN 1936
and was estimated by dividing the mass of the sample by its volume. The testing samples with (Ø100 x
200) mm dimensions were used to measure the density after 28 days.</p>
      <p>The compressive strength is measured on a VEB Werktoff Prufmaschinen Leipzig, 500 kN, ambient
condition temperature 23 ± 2 oC, and relative humidity 65 %. The samples are cured and tested by the
standard ASTM C 31/C 31M. Values are the averages of four separate tests. Data that deviated by more
than 10 % were eliminated. The loading was displacement-controlled at a constant rate of 2.4 mm/min
for all the tests. At least two cylinders are tested at the same age and the average strength is reported as
the test result to the nearest 0.1 MPa.</p>
      <p>The modulus of elasticity by the equation:
  = 2707√ 
+ 5300,
where fcm is compressive strength, MPa.</p>
      <p>In order to obtain different mechanical properties of geopolymers, necessary for multicriteria
optimization of their composition, the conditions of their curing were changed from the beginning of
the process of formation of the geopolymer mixture structure after 7, 14, 28, 90 days. The obtained
results of mechanical properties of geopolymers are presented in Table 2.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. Result and Discussion</title>
      <p>
        The presented methods and results of determining the mechanical properties of geopolymers through
their relationship with the mechanism of structure formation were used as a basis for the construction
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        )
of the transition probability matrix in Table 3, in which the current initial value of the probabilities of
mechanical properties is represented as the first row of the matrix, and the subsequent ones - as rows
denoting transitions to subsequent states. The sum of probabilities in each row is equal to 1. Processing
of this matrix by the method of Markov chain calculation allows determining values of weighting
coefficients j.
The initial state vector in accordance with Table 3 can be written in the form:
      </p>
      <p>
        P(0) = 0.4000,0.3000,0.2000,0.1000 
The transition probability matrix has the following form:
We repeat similar calculations until constant stationary values of the state vector are reached:
P(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ) = P(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ) T = 0.4434 ,0.2327 ,0.1815,0.1424 
P(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ) = P(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ) T = 0.4434 ,0.2327 ,0.1814 ,0.1425 
P(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ) = P(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ) T = 0.4434 ,0.2327 ,0.1814 ,0.1425 
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        )
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
      </p>
      <p>Starting from the fifth step, the values of the state vector stop changing. Thus, we have the following
set of weight coefficients for the mechanical parameters of geopolymers:
• compressive strength  = 0.4434
• density  = 0.2327
• Young's modulus  = 0.1814
• Splitting tensile strength  = 0.1425</p>
      <p>The method of criteria convolution consists in transformation of vector criterion into scalar one and
manifests itself in assigning coefficients of initial criteria of its subsequent ectremization on the set of
admissible variants. In its sense, the convolution is a weighted average of the initial criteria. The
condition for using convolution of criteria is their reduction to a single scale, i.e. normalisation. In
single-criteria or scalar optimisation, a single objective function is defined over a set of decision options.
In multicriteria optimisation there are several such functions at once, forming a vector criterion.</p>
      <p>The solution to a scalar optimisation problem is considered to be the element that maximises or
minimises the target function. In the case of multicriteria vector optimisation, there is maximisation for
one criterion and minimisation for the rest. The set of solutions is represented as a set of selectable
vectors.
The methodology of calculations of parameters of target functions based on multi-criteria analysis using
Laplace, Hurwitz, and Wald criteria requires consistent use and finding experimental values of
deviations from the priority location of targets. The results of calculations and values of convolutions
and criteria for determining the optimality of mechanical parameters of geopolymers are presented in
Table 5</p>
      <p>
        The calculations were carried out in the Maple computer mathematics system. Table 4,5 presents
the results of calculations by formulas (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref4 ref5 ref6 ref7 ref8 ref9">3–9</xref>
        ) for each group of mechanical parameters. Based on expert
assessments, the optimal values of the parameters were established (maximum or minimum values from
Table 2): density - minimum; compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, Young's modulus
maximum;
      </p>
      <p>
        Table 5 uses the following designations: ya — additive convolution (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ); yms - multiplicative
convolution (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ); ymd - additional multiplicative convolution (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ); Vald - Wald criterion (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ); Laplace
Laplace criterion (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ); Hurwitz - Hurwitz criterion (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ). The optimal values of the criteria and
convolutions are highlighted in bold and in color.
An analysis of the results obtained allows us to state that the depreciation of convolutions (additive,
multiplicative, and additional multiplicative) gives an unambiguous conclusion - the optimal
composition of 90M5. The Laplace criterion also indicates the composition of 90M5. The optimum
composition of geopolymer mixtures was determined: 100 g of fly ash, 150 g of cement, 180 g of
activator solution, 90 g of fine sand, 480 g of coarse aggregate.
      </p>
      <p>The Wald criterion gives the optimal composition 90M3, while it should be noted that the values of
the convolutions and the Laplace criterion (minimum) for this composition are also close to the
minimum values. Therefore, the 90M3 composition can be put in second place in terms of optimal
mechanical properties.</p>
      <p>
        The Hurwitz criterion significantly depends on the pessimism coefficient  (see formula (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        )), the
choice of which is subjective and greatly changes the result. Therefore, the Hurwitz criterion should be
considered an auxiliary one and its discrepancy with the general trend should not be considered.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>7. Conclusions</title>
      <p>The proposed intellectual system of multi-criteria evaluation using Markov chains has been developed
in the hybrid implementation of structured and unstructured problems of obtaining optimal
characteristics of geopolymers. Combining subjective and objective elements of decision selection this
approach represents a new way of information processing based on mathematical modelling and
probabilistic dynamics.</p>
      <p>The simulation of target function parameters has shown the advantage of evaluating the
digitalization of technologies in the analysis of geopolymer properties, where the qualitative side of
loosely structured problems is solved with the help of Markov chains, while for quantitative conclusions
criterion methods are used, and the final result best combines the results of both applications.</p>
      <p>The methodology of the complex use of Markov chains in combination with optimization criteria is
the basis for the application of the target functions to increase the reliability of the parameter estimation
for determining the optimal composition and structure of geopolymers when changing their
manufacturing technologies.</p>
      <p>Prospects for further research of the authors consist in the creation of hybrid models of quantitative
and qualitative methods of experimental data processing in combination with prediction methods, where
the method presented in the article can be used at the stage of data preprocessing
[15] J. Xu, L. Guo, R. Zhang, H. Hu, F. Wang, Z. Pei, QoS-aware Service Composition Using Fuzzy</p>
      <p>Set Theory and Genetic Algorithm. Wireless Personal Communications, 102 2 (2018) 1009-1028.
[16] R. Kussmaul, M. Zogg, P. Ermanni, An optimality criteria-based algorithm for efficient design
optimisation of laminated composites using concurrentresizing and scaling. Structural and
Multidisciplinary Optimisation, 58 2 (2018) 735-750.
[17] A.V. Boldyrev, D.M. Kozlov, M.V. Pavelchuk, Evaluation of Anisogrid Composite Lattice
Structures Weight Effectiveness using the Load-carrying Factor. Procedia Engineering, 185 (2017)
153-159.
[18] C.B. Pop, V.R. Chifu, I. Salomie, R.B. Baico, M. Dinsoreanu, G. Copil, A hybrid firefly-inspired
approach for optimal semantic web service composition Scalable Computing, 12 3 (2011)
363369.
[19] C.D. Frenette, R. Beauregard, A. Salenikovich, D. Derome, Multi-criteria evaluation of the
compositions of walls of light frame wood construction [Évaluation multi-critère descompositions
de murs à ossature légère en bois], in:Proceedings, Annual Conference - Canadian Society for Civil
Engineering, 2017, pp. 909-918
[20] K. Korniejenko, P. Kejzlar, P. Louda, The Influence of the Material Structure on the Mechanical
Properties of Geopolymer Composites Reinforced with Short Fibers Obtained with Additive
Technologies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 4 (2022).
[21] K. Korniejenko, M. Łach, S.-Y. Chou, W.-T. Lin, A. Cheng, M. Hebdowska-Krupa, S. Gadek,
J. Mikuła, Mechanical properties of short fiber-reinforced geopolymers made by casted and 3D
printing methods: A comparative study. Materials, 13 3 (2020).
[22] A.T. Akono, S. Koric, W.M. Kriven, Influence of pore structure on the strength behavior of
particle- and fiber-reinforced metakaolin-based geopolymer composites. Cement and Concrete
Composites, 104 (2019).
[23] J. Akmal, M. Badaruddin, M.K. Ismoyo, S.D. Yuwono, optimisation of matrix compositions of
Al2O3, SiO2, Caolin, and CaO on the mechanical properties of a geopolymer composite with short
carbon fiber, in: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 602 1 (2019).
[24] F. Amalia, N. Akifah, Nurfadilla, Subaer Development of coconut trunk fiber geopolymer hybrid
composite for structural engineering materials, in: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and
Engineering, 180, 2017.
[25] A. V. Buketov, A. V. Sharko, D. A. Zinchenko, D. M. Stepanchikov, To the problem of ingredients
optimisation of composite materials based on epoxy resin. Bulletin of the karaganda
universitymathematics, 86 2 (2017) 37–44. doi: 10.31489/2017M2/37-44.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.S.</given-names>
            <surname>Le</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.M. Szczypinski</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hájková</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kovacic</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bakalova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Volesky</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hiep</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Louda</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Foam at High Temperature, Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater.
          <volume>27</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>129</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>138</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.S.</given-names>
            <surname>Le</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Hájková</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Kovačič</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Bakalova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Voleský</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.H.</given-names>
            <surname>Le</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.C.</given-names>
            <surname>Seifert</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.P.</given-names>
            <surname>Peres</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Louda</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Thermal Conductivity of Reinforced Geopolymer Foams. Ceram.-Silikáty</source>
          ,
          <volume>63</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <fpage>365</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>373</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Sharko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Louda</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Nguyen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Buczkowska</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Stepanchikov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Ercoli</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Le</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Multicriteria Assessment for Calculating the Optimal Content of Calcium-Rich Fly Ash in Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers</article-title>
          . Ceramics,
          <volume>6 1</volume>
          (
          <issue>2023</issue>
          )
          <fpage>525</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>537</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Sharko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Petrushenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Gonchar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Vasylenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Vorobyova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Zakryzhevska</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Information Support of Intelligent Decision Support Systems for Managing Complex Organizational</article-title>
          and
          <source>Technical Objects Based on Markov Chains, CEUR Workshop Proceedings</source>
          ,
          <year>2022</year>
          ,
          <volume>3171</volume>
          , рр.
          <fpage>986</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>998</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Sharko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Liubchuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Krapivina,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Petrushenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Gonchar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Vorobyova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Vasylenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Information Technology to Assess the Enterprises'
          <article-title>Readiness for Innovative Transformations Using Markov Chains</article-title>
          .
          <source>Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies</source>
          ,
          <volume>149</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <fpage>197</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>213</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Duan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>George</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Bullo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Markov Chains with Maximum Return Time Entropy for Robotic Surveillance</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control</source>
          ,
          <volume>65 1</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>72</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>86</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.V.</given-names>
            <surname>Sharko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.V.</given-names>
            <surname>Sharko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Innovative aspects of management of development of enterprises of regional tourism</article-title>
          .
          <source>Actual problems of economy, 8</source>
          <volume>158</volume>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
          <fpage>224</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>229</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Ludwig</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Doymoyou</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Balempas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A hidden Markov model for lymphatic turor progression in the head and neck</article-title>
          .
          <source>Sci.Rep</source>
          ,
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <article-title>12261</article-title>
          . DOI 10.1038/S41598-0.
          <fpage>21</fpage>
          -91544- 1.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Obhiomo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Weke</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Ngaze</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Modeling Kenyan Economic Impact of Corona Virus in Kenya Using Discrete Time Markov Chains</article-title>
          .
          <source>Jornal of Finance and Economics</source>
          ,
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>80</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>85</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Nosov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Zinchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Ben</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Popovych</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Mateichuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Nosova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Formal approaches to identyfi cadet fatigue factors by means of marine navigation simulators</article-title>
          .
          <source>CEUR Workshop Proceeding</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          ,
          <volume>2732</volume>
          , pp.
          <fpage>823</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>838</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.S.</given-names>
            <surname>Laird-Fick</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.J.</given-names>
            <surname>Parker</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Using Markov chain model to evaluate medical students trajectory on progress tests and predict USMLE step 1 scores a retrospective cohort study in one medical school</article-title>
          .
          <source>BMC Med</source>
          . Educ,
          <volume>21</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>200</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>K.K. Wu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yam</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Meng</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Mesbani, Parallel probabilistic swarm guidance by exploiting Kronecker product structures in discrete-time Markov chains</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceeding of the American Control Conference</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>346</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>355</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          , D. Han,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Y</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Jia,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Asphalt mixture skeleton main force chains composition criteria and characteristics evaluation based on discreteelement methods</article-title>
          .
          <source>Construction and Building Materials</source>
          ,
          <volume>323</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Tang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Shu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>He</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Yang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Sun</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Quantitative Risk Evaluation Model of the Multilevel Complex Structure Hierarchical System in the PetrochemicalIndustry</article-title>
          . Mathematical Problems in Engineering, (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>