Artificial Intelligence systems are increasingly playing an increasingly important role in our daily lives. As their importance in our everyday lives grows, it is fundamental that the internal mechanisms that guide these algorithms are as clear as possible. It is not by chance that the recent General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) emphasized the users' right to explanation when people face artificial intelligencebased technologies. Unfortunately, the current research tends to go in the opposite direction, since most of the approaches try to maximize the efectiveness of the models (e.g., recommendation accuracy) at the expense of the explainability and the transparency. The main research questions which arise from this scenario is straightforward: how can we deal with such a dichotomy between the need for efective adaptive systems and the right to transparency and interpretability? Several research lines are triggered by this question: building transparent intelligent systems, analyzing the impact of opaque algorithms on ifnal users, studying the role of explanation strategies, investigating how to provide users with more control in the behavior of intelligent systems. XAI.it, the Italian workshop on Explainable AI, tries to address these research lines and aims to provide a forum for the Italian community to discuss problems, challenges and innovative approaches in the various sub-fields of XAI.
LGOBE http://www.di.uniba.it/~swap/musto (C. Musto); https://kdd.isti.cnr.it/people/guidotti-riccardo (R. Guidotti); http://www.di.uniba.it/~swap/semeraro.html (G. Semeraro)
As intelligent systems become more and more widely applied (especially in very “sensitive” domain), it is not possible to adopt opaque or inscrutable black-box models or to ignore the general rationale that guides the algorithms in the task it carries on Moreover, the metrics that are usually adopted to evaluate the efectiveness of the algorithms reward very opaque methodologies that maximize the accuracy of the model at the expense of the transparency and explainability.
This issue is even more felt in the light of the recent experiences, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and DARPA’s Explainable AI Project, which further emphasized the need and the right for scrutable and transparent methodologies that can guide the user in a complete comprehension of the information held and managed by AI-based systems.
Accordingly, the main motivation of the workshop is simple and straightforward: how can we deal with such a dichotomy between the need for efective intelligent systems and the right to transparency and interpretability?
These questions trigger several lines, that are particularly relevant for the current research in AI. The workshop tries to address these research lines and aims to provide a forum for the Italian community to discuss problems, challenges and innovative approaches in the area.
We believe that the program provides a good balance between the diferent topics related to the area of Explainable AI. Moreover, the program will be further enriched through a keynote given by Giovanni Stilo from University of L’Aquila.
The accepted papers range from the definition of new methodologies to explain the behavior of artificial intelligence systems to the development of new applications implementing the principles of Explainable AI. In total, 8 contributions were accepted at XAI.it 2023 (7 of them included in the proceedings):
As a final remark, the program co-chairs would like to thank all the members of the Program Committee (listed below), as well as the organizers of the AIxIA 2023 Conference1. • Davide Bacciu, Università di Pisa • Valerio Basile, Università di Torino • Ludovico Boratto, Università di Cagliari • Roberta Calegari, Università di Bologna • Roberto Capobianco, Università di Roma La Sapienza • Federica Cena, Università di Trento • Roberto Confalonieri, Libera Università di Bozen-Bolzano • Rodolfo Delmonte, Università Ca’ Foscari • Alessandro Giuliani, Università di Cagliari • Kyriaki Kalimeri, ISI Foundation • Antonio Lieto, Università di Torino • Francesca Alessandra Lisi, Università di Bari • Mirko Marras, Università di Cagliari • Ruggero Pensa, Università di Torino • Claudio Pomo, Politecnico di Bari • Roberto Prevete, Università di Naples Federico II • Antonio Rago, Imperial College London • Amon Rapp, Università di Torino • Salvatore Ruggieri, Università di Pisa • Giuseppe Sansonetti, Roma Tre University • Mattia Setzu, Università di Pisa • Fabrizio Silvestri, Università di Roma La Sapienza • Gabriele Tolomei, Università di Roma La Sapienza