<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>SAS Classification in the creation of new companies in Ecuador</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Daniel Mosquera</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Fabricio Echeverria</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Marcelo León</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Luis Torres-Barrera</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Eladio Freire</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Consejo de la Judicatura del Ecuador</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Guayaquil</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="EC">Ecuador</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Guayaquil</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="EC">Ecuador</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Instituto Tecnológico Superior Espiritu Santo</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Guayaquil</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="EC">Ecuador</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>Universidad Ecotec</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Samborondon</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="EC">Ecuador</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4">
          <label>4</label>
          <institution>Universidad Estatal Peninsula de Santa Elena</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>La Libertad</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="EC">Ecuador</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>100</fpage>
      <lpage>111</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>he aim of the present study was to analyze the behavior of companies incorporated in Ecuador under the Simplified Stock Companies (SAS) framework using statistical tools. This analysis was conducted in light of the objectives outlined in the Organic Law of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, which aims to foster entrepreneurship in the country. The primary focus of this research is to comprehend the impact of the new regulations on the establishment of ventures and new businesses in Ecuador. To achieve this, a retrospective methodology was employed, involving an examination of primary data sourced from the online portal of the Superintendency of Companies, Securities, and Insurance. The outcomes of this investigation encompass a descriptive statistical analysis that delineates the behavioral landscape of SAS companies. This analysis enables us to gauge the influence of the SAS framework in comparison to other company types, assess the attrition rates within the initial years, identify geographical regions with the highest concentration of SAS-utilizing companies, and pinpoint the key economic sectors experiencing growth under the Organic Law of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. These findings serve as a foundational basis that underscores the potential need for more specific complementary research and the formulation of strategic proposals. These endeavors are crucial for realizing the concrete achievement of the objectives stipulated in the aforementioned law.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Entrepreneurship</kwd>
        <kwd>Innovation</kwd>
        <kwd>Simplified Stock Companies</kwd>
        <kwd>Online Platform</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Since its enactment in the Oficial Register, the Organic Law of Entrepreneurship and Innovation
has held a central role in establishing a regulatory framework that actively fosters, supports,
and advances entrepreneurship throughout the country [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref2">1, 2</xref>
        ]. Notably, Ecuador introduced
the legal concept of "Simplified Stock Companies," referred to by the acronym SAS, as a pivotal
outcome of this legislation.
      </p>
      <p>This mechanism, gaining rapid traction within both the business community and the
community of entrepreneurs, has garnered popularity due to its operational advantages. These
include the ability to establish entities without the mandatory imposition of a minimum capital
requirement, the flexibility to delineate an open-ended corporate purpose encompassing various
legal commercial or civil activities, the option to define an indefinite duration, the potential for
single-shareholder establishment, and the facilitation of a fully electronic incorporation process,
eliminating the necessity for formal deeds, among other compelling benefits.</p>
      <p>
        Embedded within the Organic Law of Entrepreneurship and Innovation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], are the articulated
objectives outlined in Article 2 of the legislation. These objectives encompass:
• Establishing an inter-institutional framework that formulates a state policy to nurture
the growth of entrepreneurship and innovation.
• Streamlining the initiation, operation, and dissolution procedures of enterprises.
• Cultivating the eficiency and competitiveness of entrepreneurial ventures.
• Promoting the development of technical, financial, and administrative support programs
for entrepreneurs through public policy initiatives.
• Reinforcing interaction and synergy between the educational system and actors within
the national productive system, spanning public, private, mixed-economy, popular and
solidarity, cooperative, associative, community, and artisan domains.
      </p>
      <p>• Promote innovation within the landscape of productive development.</p>
      <p>In light of this context, the present article sets forth the initiative to embark upon a
comprehensive series of inquiries about the outcomes witnessed during the initial years after the
enactment of the Organic Law of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Specifically, this study aims
to delve into the establishment of companies utilizing the simplified joint stock companies’
framework, the predominant industrial sectors capturing entrepreneurial interest, the
geographical regions that have demonstrated the highest propensity for embracing this particular
framework, and the evolving significance this mode of incorporation has assumed within the
Ecuadorian business milieu.</p>
      <p>Emerging from the gleaned results, this endeavor will profer novel avenues for research,
thereby facilitating the delineation of targeted investigations directed toward pivotal sectors.
This, in turn, will facilitate the execution of qualitative analyses, thereby engendering the
generation of novel insights and knowledge.</p>
      <p>
        The paramount significance of this investigation rests in its capacity to yield judicious
conclusions and precise technical recommendations as the sequence of inquiries unfolds. These
outputs will subsequently underpin the formulation of strategic frameworks [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] aimed at
advancing the salient goals encapsulated within the aforementioned law.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Literature</title>
      <p>
        Undoubtedly, a foundational pillar of this research rests upon an intricate examination of the
legal framework instituted by the Organic Law of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. This
entails an exploration of its underlying objectives, its articulated purposes, the definitional
parameters it sets forth, and most crucially, a comprehensive grasp of its overarching mission.
The focus will be on elucidating its multifaceted pursuit through the channel of public policies
and institutional mechanisms, all aimed at fostering entrepreneurship. This includes catalyzing
the establishment of novel enterprises, nurturing entrepreneurial education, and propounding
diverse financing and investment avenues—key focal points underscored within the purview of
this legislation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Since the introduction of the Simplified Stock Companies framework has efectively
attenuated the burdensome regulatory encumbrances that have historically impeded and restricted
enterprise formation, it is noteworthy that such measures align with the recommendations
articulated by esteemed bodies like the Inter-American Development Bank1. Indeed, the
streamlining and transparency of administrative processes are advocated as strategies to galvanize the
proliferation of businesses within a nation’s economy Escamilla et al., [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] a tangible achievement
facilitated by this groundbreaking legislation.
      </p>
      <p>
        Drawing reference from the scholarly discourse, consideration will be accorded to the
scholarly work presented by [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. In their comprehensive study, a meticulous dissection of prominent
entrepreneurship theories is undertaken, culminating in a propositional taxonomy that
distills the discourse into four primary research streams: psychology, sociology, economics, and
business management. This classification serves as a pivotal framework guiding the academic
exploration of entrepreneurship’s multifarious dimensions.
      </p>
      <p>
        Among these four research streams, as outlined in the research topics and problematics posited
by Chu [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ], the ongoing study is poised to establish a comprehensive foundational framework of
knowledge, thereby paving the way for a diverse array of supplementary investigations within
each of these research branches.
      </p>
      <p>• Psychology: This domain delves into the study of entrepreneurial traits and behaviors,
with a primary focus on unraveling the intricacies of entrepreneurial characteristics and
processes. The central thrust of this endeavor lies in comprehending the causative factors
and motivations that underpin entrepreneurial pursuits.
• Sociology: Encompassing the social and cultural origins of entrepreneurs, this research
avenue contributes to our holistic understanding of the impetuses and triggers that propel
individuals toward entrepreneurial ventures.
• Economics: An indispensable branch scrutinizing the economic landscape and its
symbiotic relationship with entrepreneurial initiatives. This facet enriches our comprehension
of the tangible impact that entrepreneurial management exerts within the economic
milieu.
• Business Management: Centered on the aptitude, administration, and expansion of
entrepreneurs, this research domain critically informs our insights into contemporary
enterprise behavior.</p>
      <p>
        The proposed study will methodically present its findings through the prism of descriptive
statistical analysis, serving as the primary analytical tool. This approach entails the systematic
1Banco Mundial https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/32436/9781464814402.pdf
organization, synthesis, and illustrative presentation of data, all converging toward a
comprehensive grasp of the study’s focal point [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. At its core, this study is fundamentally geared
toward an in-depth exploration of the behavioral dynamics exhibited by companies established
under the framework of Simplified Stock Companies. This legal construct emerges as a tangible
outcome stemming from the propositions outlined within the Organic Law of Entrepreneurship
and Innovation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Methodology</title>
      <p>The chosen research methodology was Documentary Research. This technique involves content
analysis drawn from documentary sources and electronic portals. It entails extracting pertinent
information from documents of primary relevance, organizing, categorizing, and analyzing
them according to the researcher’s objectives. This method serves as a means to systematize
and group essential information, thus forming the basis for the final study report. The veracity
and objectivity of the knowledge acquired are substantiated through a comparison of the
explanations provided with the current reality.</p>
      <p>
        The dataset for this statistical analysis was culled from the Superintendency of Companies,
Securities, and Insurance registry, with a data cutof point of March 14, 2023 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ], encompassing
Simplified Stock Companies in Ecuador.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>3.1. Design and Interventions</title>
        <p>
          This study predominantly adopts a documentary research design coupled with a retrospective
methodology, as elucidated by [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ]. Document analysis, synonymous with documentary analysis,
entails scrutinizing documents for data retrieval. In this context, primary documents are
pivotal as they yield data crucial for deriving results and conclusions. One of the strengths
of documentary analysis is its ability to accommodate retrospective investigations, allowing
the researcher to examine documents from previous periods, even when the study itself is
conducted in a subsequent year.
        </p>
        <p>The primary objective of this study is to discern the impact of Simplified Stock Companies
(SAS) on the novel landscape of company establishment in Ecuador. The inquiry seeks to
explore this impact based on various factors including company type, geographical region, city,
and International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC) type. The study also aims to verify
whether the law’s objective of bolstering enterprises through the creation of SAS companies
has been achieved.</p>
        <p>The data compilation process from the Superintendency of Companies’ database will employ
descriptive statistical tools such as distribution tables, and graphs, as well as bivariate analysis
of variables and attributes.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>3.2. Population and Environment</title>
        <p>
          The research’s target population comprises the total number of companies registered with the
Superintendency of Companies, Securities, and Insurance, as of the data cutof date of March
14, 2023. This population totals 183,849 companies with varying statuses. The focus of the main
study, however, centers on companies with active status, leading to a real population of 142,143
companies [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          ].
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>3.3. Statistic analysis</title>
        <p>
          The variables incorporated into the design encompassed: Company Type, Company Legal Status,
Date of Incorporation, Geographic Information (Region - Province - City), and the International
Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC) code, which characterizes each company’s economic
activity within Ecuador [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>The data procured from the Superintendency of Companies, Securities, and Insurance database
facilitated the execution of an analysis aimed at comprehending the behavioral patterns of SAS
companies and their relative impact when juxtaposed with other company types. Moreover,
this analysis encompassed geographic distribution at the province and city levels, as well as the
segmentation of economic activities.</p>
        <p>The presentation of results was facilitated through various statistical tools, including
quantitative, relative, and cumulative frequency distribution tables. Additionally, techniques such
as Pareto analysis, histogram development, and circular graphs were employed to illustrate
participation dynamics. The collective application of these tools enabled the systematic collation,
arrangement, tabulation, analysis, synthesis, and in-depth study of the implications engendered
by SAS companies on the Ecuadorian business landscape.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Results and Discussion</title>
      <p>The outcomes of this research are exclusively grounded in an examination of Simplified Stock
Companies (SAS) as of March 14, 2023. The ensuing section outlines the salient findings, which
are deemed most pertinent, as follows:
anonymous 72889 72% 28202 28% 101091 55%
limited liability 33154 72% 12934 28% 46088 25%
Simplified joint stock company 34981 100% 28 0% 35009 19%
foreign branch 944 70% 403 30% 1347 1%
Association or consortium 121 80% 30 twenty% 151 0%
Anonymous in rustic properties 10 13% 66 87% 76 0%
Mixed economy 35 49% 37 51% 72 0%
Anonymous Andean multinational 7 64% 4 36% eleven 0%
limited by shares 2 fifty% 2 fifty% 4 0%
Grand Total 142,143.00 41,706.00 183,849.00 100%
* Percentage value: Vertical analysis indicates the percentage of the type of company concerning the general total.
** Percentage value: Horizontal analysis, presents cumulative values of the general total.*** For this
research, all the states of companies that do not have their active status are grouped, among which are, companies
in canceled status, in the process of dissolution or inactive.</p>
      <p>Although companies operating as simplified joint stock entities have a history of less than
three years, it is crucial to underscore that within this brief span, they have remarkably
positioned themselves as the third most prolific company type in terms of volume. This standing
places them only behind long-established entities such as anonymous companies and limited
liability companies, which boast over 60 or 70 years of operational history. This trajectory
suggests that should the current growth trajectory of SAS companies persist, they could
imminently ascend to becoming the most prevalent form of enterprise within the Ecuadorian
economic landscape.</p>
      <p>Another noteworthy observation pertains to the fact that, up to the present date, the
proportion of SAS companies not operating under the "Active" status is a mere 0.08%. This statistic is
closely linked to their newness, signifying that a substantial majority of these enterprises are in
a legal operational state. It is pertinent to emphasize that henceforth, the ensuing studies will
exclusively center on companies that are in active operational status. Table 2:
Grand Total 34,981.00 107,162.00 142,143.00
* Percentage value: Vertical analysis indicates the percentage of the type of company concerning the general total.
** Percentage value: Horizontal analysis, presents cumulative values of the general total.** * Companies in active
status are analyzed, additionally for this investigation other companies are grouped into the following
classes: Public Limited, Limited Liability, Partnership by simplified shares, foreign branch, association or consortium,
anonymous in rustic properties, mixed economy, Andean multinational anonymous, Limited by shares.</p>
      <p>To comprehend the nationwide impact, Table 2 presents a concentration analysis of SAS
companies based on regions. This analysis reveals a percentage impact varying between 21%
and 29%, with the Sierra and Galapagos regions exhibiting the most pronounced accumulation
of such enterprises.</p>
      <p>To further enhance the scope of this investigation, an analysis will subsequently be presented
at the provincial level. This analysis aims to identify the provinces demonstrating a heightened
concentration of SAS entities.</p>
      <p>Although the analysis presented in Table 3 confirms that the commercial activity of Ecuador
is mainly concentrated in Guayas and Pichincha, with 38% and 32% of the total number of active
companies in the country, the equivalent of 70% of the total of companies in the country, it is
highlighted that there are important results in other provinces where, although the volume
of companies is lower, they have had a high percentage of creation of SAS companies. These
provinces are detailed below:</p>
      <p>
        The geographical analysis outcomes furnish invaluable insights for shaping forthcoming
research endeavors. Building upon the identified concentration hubs, future investigations
can delve into the delineation of distinct social and cultural attributes unique to each region.
Province
Such attributes will serve as a foundation for sociological inquiries aligned with the proposed
classification [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11 ref6">6, 11</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Another pivotal facet of this study is the categorization of nascent companies based on their
economic activities. This classification is anchored in the International Standard Industrial
Classification of all economic activities, commonly referred to as the ISIC code. Table 5 presents
the study’s results in this regard. Furthermore, these outcomes will be augmented through the
application of a Pareto analysis [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]. This analytical approach aims to ascertain the economic
activities exhibiting the highest concentration of enterprises within the nation.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Discussion</title>
      <p>
        The study’s results underscore the substantial growth in the establishment of new
companies catalyzed by the Organic Law of Entrepreneurship and Innovation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. These entities
predominantly cluster within the following economic activities:
• Wholesale and Retail; motor vehicle and motorcycle repair: 9,359 new SAS companies.
• Professional, scientific, and technical activities: 6,531 new SAS companies.
• Construction: 3,121 new SAS companies.
• Administrative and support services activities: 2,189 new SAS companies.
• Information and communication: 2,166 new SAS companies.
      </p>
      <p>In totality, the study identifies a cumulative registration of 34,981 new SAS companies within
three years. This surge undoubtedly wields a noteworthy impact on the local economy and the
generation of fresh employment opportunities. Concurrently, the research pinpoints the highest
concentration of SAS ventures within the provinces of Pichincha and Guayas, collectively
accounting for 13,203 and 11,316 SAS companies, respectively. This amalgamates to constitute
a remarkable 70% of the nation’s total ventures.</p>
      <p>The impact of this legislation has been particularly prominent in provinces such as Azuay,
Imbabura, Napo, and Pastaza. In these regions, despite a comparatively lower volume of
companies, the most noteworthy growth in SAS companies has been recorded, exceeding 30%
of the total companies within each of these provinces.</p>
      <p>Presently, SAS companies hold the distinction of being the third-largest category of enterprises
in the country. Their positioning places them just below the traditional anonymous and
limited liability companies. However, a distinctive attribute sets them apart from the rest—SAS
companies exhibit the highest continuity rate. To elucidate, an impressive 99.92% of these
companies remain actively operational. This contrasts starkly with the average inactivity or
cancellation rate of 28% witnessed among other company types.</p>
      <p>
        The Organic Law of Entrepreneurship and Innovation outlines supplementary objectives
aimed at furnishing requisite support to ensure the economic prosperity of new ventures. Among
these objectives, several salient points emerge the promotion of entrepreneurs’ eficiency and
competitiveness; the advocacy for public policies facilitating the development of technical,
ifnancial, and administrative support programs for entrepreneurs; and the reinforcement of
interaction and synergy between the educational system and actors from diverse domains,
including the public, private, mixed, popular and solidarity economy, cooperative, associative,
community, and artisan sectors of the national productive landscape [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Of these enumerated objectives, it becomes evident that in-depth investigations deriving
insights from the present study are essential. Such investigations could subsequently underpin
the formulation of precise strategies tailored to specific geographical sectors or economic
activities displaying heightened enterprise concentration. One of the outcomes of this research,
the "Heat Table - Concentration of SAS by Economic Activity and Province," is proposed to
enable the development of recommendations and proposals in a prompt and eficacious manner.
Heat Table – Concentration of SAS by Economic Activity and Province</p>
      <p>International Standard Industrial Classification of all economic activities
TO</p>
      <p>B</p>
      <p>C
• D - Supply of electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning.
• E - Water distribution; sewage, waste management and sanitation activities.
• F - Construction.
• G - Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles.
• H - Transportation and storage.
• I - Accommodation and food service activities.
• J - Information and communication.
• K - Financial and insurance activities.
• L - Real estate activities.
• M - Professional, scientific and technical activities.
• N - Administrative and support service activities.
• P - Teaching.
• Q - Human health care and social assistance activities.
• R - Arts, entertainment and recreation.</p>
      <p>• S - Other service activities.</p>
      <p>Finally, the present study underscores the imperative for complementary investigations aimed
at uncovering other facets of knowledge, including sociological and psychological dimensions,
in alignment with the proposed classification of entrepreneurial research streams. Within these
prospective studies, the following aspects merit consideration:
1. Analysis of the influencing factors and motivations driving the establishment of new
ventures.
2. Examination of the intent to persist in entrepreneurship, contingent upon the levels of
achievement or disillusionment experienced by nascent entrepreneurs.
3. Economic assessment of the wealth generation impact across diferent sectors.
4. Economic analysis of job creation resultant from new entrepreneurial endeavors.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. Conclusions</title>
      <p>In connection to the first three objectives delineated in the Organic Law of Entrepreneurship
and Innovation, it is incontrovertible that the introduction of the legal framework for company
incorporation under the "Simplified Stock Companies" (SAS) modality has emerged as one of
the most influential pillars shaping the nation’s economic landscape. Presently, SAS companies
established within the last three years constitute a substantial 19% of the entire active corporate
cohort in Ecuador. Notably, this phenomenon is particularly pronounced in cities such as
Guayaquil, Quito, and Cuenca, which exhibit the highest concentration of SAS companies.
This surge is underscored by a pronounced presence in key commercial sectors including
"Wholesale and retail trade," "Repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles," "Professional, scientific,
and technical activities," "Construction," "Administrative and support services," "Information
and communication," and "Manufacturing industries."</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Del Ecuador</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Asamblea nacional república del ecuador</article-title>
          . ley orgánica de emprendimiento e innovación,
          <source>Recuperado el 6</source>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>2020</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>03</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Rivera</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Leon</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Cornejo,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Florez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Analysis of the efect of human capital, institutionality and globalization on economic complexity: Comparison between latin america and countries with greater economic diversification</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Economies</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <fpage>204</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Morante</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. del Pilar</given-names>
            <surname>Villamil</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Florez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Framework for supporting the creation of marketing strategies</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Information</source>
          <volume>20</volume>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
          <fpage>7371</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>7378</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Escamilla</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Caldera</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Carrillo Andres</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Burocracia y financiamiento¿ inhibidores del emprendimiento en méxico? un breve análisis= bureaucracy and financing? inhibitors of entrepreneurship in mexico? a brief review</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Terán-Yepez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Guerrero-Mora</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Teorías de emprendimiento: revisión crítica de la literatura y sugerencias para futuras investigaciones</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Revista espacios 41</source>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Chu</surname>
          </string-name>
          , The research for entrepreneurship,
          <year>1998</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Wathen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Marchal</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Lind</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Estadística aplicada a los negocios y la economía</article-title>
          ,
          <source>McGraw Hill México</source>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8] S. de Compañías, Portal de información directorio de compañías,
          <year>2019</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
            <surname>Arias</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gonzáles</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Técnicas e instrumentos de investigación científica,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>INEC</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Clasificación nacional de actividades
          <source>econòmicas ciiu 4.0</source>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
            <surname>Kruger</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Creativity in the entrepreneurship domain</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Ph.D. thesis</source>
          , University of Pretoria,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Spiegel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Stephens</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Estadística. méxico df,
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>