<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Analysis of open data interoperability through catalogs in Latin America</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Roxana Martínez</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Gastón Lacuesta</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ezequiel Ricciardi</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Universidad Argentina de la Empresa</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Buenos Aires</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="AR">Argentina</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>118</fpage>
      <lpage>134</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Today, interoperability between software systems is in full swing. This aspect allows information to be exchanged and reused between diferent data sources, as well as between software. One of the fields of application is state governments that share open public data and facilitate joint management and transparency between organizations and citizens. This paper addresses the importance of open data interoperability in the governmental context. This article presents a review of various open government initiatives in Latin America, in addition, it analyzes a sample of sets of open public data catalogs extracted from government web portals in Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Uruguay, Chile, and Argentina), to study possible shortcomings in aspects of accessibility, interoperability and contextualization of these to mitigate them in the future. For said analysis, a self-developed software tool is used that uses validation criteria based on initiatives of the Argentine Republic. Finally, an analysis of the findings is carried out to propose aspects of improvement through good practices in their treatment and help in the standardization of certain technical and structural aspects and levels of the exchange processes.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Data Interoperability</kwd>
        <kwd>Open Data Catalogs</kwd>
        <kwd>Open Government</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>In today’s global landscape, the digital era has reshaped how we access, distribute, and use
information. Information, in this setting, is not only seen as a precious asset but also as a vital
tool for making decisions, generating knowledge, and enhancing government transparency.
Interoperability, defined as the capacity of various systems and applications to exchange and
process information seamlessly, stands out as a central element in this evolving paradigm.</p>
      <p>Latin America, despite its rich cultural, political, and economic diversity, several nations in the
region, such as Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia, have shown an increasing dedication to enhancing
the interoperability of their information infrastructures. However, these praiseworthy initiatives
still encounter inherent challenges related to data standardization, updating, and structuring.</p>
      <p>This study sets out to provide a thorough and critical examination of open data catalogs
from government websites in selected Latin American nations. Using a purpose-built software
tool, we will scrutinize these catalogs to pinpoint areas of improvement, shortcomings, and
exemplary practices. Moreover, we will aim to place these discoveries within the broader context
of global movements in interoperability and data openness.</p>
      <p>Through this research, we hope to add to the international scholarly body on interoperability
and open data, delivering valuable perspectives on the current state and future outlook of this
topic in Latin America, a region with its own set of unique digital public management challenges
and opportunities.</p>
      <p>The structure of this work presents a brief introduction to the subject, then the problem
is developed in this context, later, a comparative study of some Latin American countries on
this situation is shown, and then an analysis of data collected from the countries is explained.
government websites of the countries studied, in which some data catalogs are analyzed using
the proposed software tool, which makes it possible to identify some shortcomings in the
contents of these public files. Finally, it culminates with the analysis and proposal of good
practices to facilitate the exchange of data between diferent organizations.</p>
      <sec id="sec-1-1">
        <title>1.1. Importance of Interoperability</title>
        <p>The concept of open government is booming in diferent countries around the world. This
approach consists of an open society, that is, a society in which the state of a country and its
citizens are the main actors in which they participate in various activities that benefit diferent
people in social and political aspects. This approach presents an active participation of citizens
in public afairs and has some pillars that are essential to consider, these are: citizen transparency,
accountability, citizen participation, and the use of various technologies and innovations that
favor this context.</p>
        <p>
          Open government refers to the freedom of information that is available to citizens and
government authorities, this makes governments more transparent and accountable in their
activities. To carry out the latter, it is necessary to develop freedom of information laws to
improve transparency, accountability, and public trust [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ]. This context allows for an optimal
administration in which ethical behavior and professionalism in public administration improve.
Therefore, this generates a relationship of greater trust between those involved, thus revealing
greater social value and wellbeing [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">2</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>One of the most important associations at the international level is the Open Government
Partnership (OGP)1, which is based on the idea that an open government is more accessible, more
receptive, and accountable to citizens and that it improves the relationship between people and
their government has long-term benefits for all. OGP includes members from various countries
who work together to cocreate two-year action plans with concrete steps (commitments) on a
wide range of issues.</p>
        <p>Several points are related to the commitment of governments to improve services, support
citizen participation, the administration of public resources, and promote public innovation.
This last point is essential to increase the availability of information, both to citizens and to
various government agencies. It is important to keep in mind the importance of awareness,
the dissemination of activities, as well as having digital platforms that provide support in the
publication of data. This leads to the need to use open standards to promote civil society access
1Open Government Partnership (OGP). https://www.opengovpartnership.org/es/about/approach/
to public data, as well as to facilitate the interoperability of government information systems2.
Innovative technologies ofer a wonderful opportunity to share information and provide public
services with greater transparency.</p>
        <p>
          That information on the activities of public entities is created and is available to the public,
on time and in open data formats with no limits to reuse, allowing an initiative-taking work
methodology by public entities [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">3</xref>
          ]. Beyond using public policies that support the idea of
open government, it is important to work on the technology approach. This work is based
on the analysis of the eforts of public organizations to achieve adequate interoperability and
availability of public data.
        </p>
        <p>The next section discusses the importance of interoperability and its benefits. Interoperability
is indispensable for the practical cooperation of digital public services. It is an essential aspect
to improve the eficiency and efectiveness of the provision of services, and at the same time,
reusing interoperable government technological solutions could allow for reducing costs in
technological platforms. It is important to understand that in addition to the public data that
can be ofered on public platforms, a strategic analysis must be presented on the digital service
infrastructures that are available. It is necessary to analyze the access to digital resources;
service infrastructure; platforms that will be provided to the community for the interconnection
of data; access to reusable public sector information; and crossborder interoperable online
services3.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-2">
        <title>1.2. Context of the problem</title>
        <p>Although the concept of interoperability provides a collaborative space in which governments
expose and consume services constantly, it can be defined that the success of this proposal lies
in the constant feedback between the parties. As part of the public digital transformation, it is
essential to have the appropriate regulatory framework and technology that allows the secure
exchange of documents and data between public entities, so this is one of the problems to be
considered in each of the governments. I would like to use this approach. Proper use would
allow citizens to access the services provided by the administration, avoiding having to submit
the same information repeatedly. In other words, one of the shortcomings to work on in this
context is data redundancy, since it should prevent the administration from generating data
replicas, keeping the authentic source safe, and making them available to those who require
groups of data to fulfill your task-interconnection of data; access to reusable public sector
information; and cross-border interoperable online services4.</p>
        <p>The investigations refer to the fact that there are several challenges and impediments to
open government management, identified in three categories: impediments to data access
(data availability and searchability), data use (related to problems with usability impediments,
understandability, quality, compatibility and metadata) and data deposition, that is, dificulties
2Open Government Partnership (OGP). https://www.opengovpartnership.org/process/joining-ogp/
open-government-declaration/</p>
        <p>3Gobierno de España. https://administracionelectronica.gob.es/pae_Home/pae_Estrategias/pae_lineas_
ccoperacion/pae_Cooperacion_Internacional/pae_Interoperabilidad_Coop_Inter.html</p>
        <p>
          4Gobierno de España. https://administracionelectronica.gob.es/pae_Home/pae_Estrategias/pae_lineas_
ccoperacion/pae_Cooperacion_Internacional/pae_Interoperabilidad_Coop_Inter.html
in the interaction with the data provider and the challenges to release the data sets, as well as
those of communication between the end user and the data of the entity [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">4</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>One of the approaches proposed by the government regarding the aforementioned aspects is
to make datasets openly available to the public on government portals, to disseminate citizen
transparency and strengthen the link between government and citizens. One of the main
problems encountered with these open data portals is the inconsistency of some data since not
all public organizations follow a particular standard for the treatment of dataset content. There
are no specific mandatory international standards. This drawback leads to poor data quality,
and as a result, various problems can occur when trying to reuse data for review, analysis, or
interoperability across data sources. To improve the quality of the open public data provided,
it is necessary to introduce a set of standards or aspects that are consistent and sustainable
over time, which will give greater possibilities of analysis to the information provided, as well
as new knowledge about possible preventive measures. This will allow avoiding flaws in the
data analysis process and, in addition, avoiding erroneous or biased results that lead to poor
decision-making.</p>
        <p>
          It is important to consider that in open data portals, the availability of these does not always
coincide with their quality, unfortunately, today it continues to be a dificulty and is a great
challenge for public policies [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">5</xref>
          ]. The analysis of many of the public data sets represents a
crucial problem, since they are not standardized and, in some cases, outdated. The publication
of public governmental data presents problems of format standardization and connection to
heterogeneous data sources [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">6</xref>
          ], so it is essential to have procedures that ensure the quality of
the content of the published data.
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Interoperability in Latin America</title>
      <p>In Latin America, the interoperability of government systems continues to be a critical issue.
Although projects to improve interoperability have been implemented in many countries in
the region, significant challenges still exist. One of the main challenges is the integration of
systems at the municipal and regional level since in many cases each municipality or region
uses its computer systems, which makes communication and information exchange between
government entities dificult.</p>
      <p>Another major challenge is the lack of data standardization. Many government systems use
diferent formats and protocols to store and transmit information, making systems integration
dificult. Data standardization is critical to efective interoperability, as it allows computer
systems to communicate efectively. The lack of common standards can make it dificult to
compare data and generate consolidated reports, which can afect informed decision-making.
In addition, information technology procurement and contracting processes are often complex
and lengthy, making it dificult to adopt more modern and eficient technologies.</p>
      <p>To address these challenges, further work on data standardization and systems integration is
needed. Governments in Latin America can promote the adoption of common data standards
and communication protocols to improve interoperability between government systems. In
addition, it is important to improve the training and education of government personnel so that
they can efectively use information systems and work together to improve the eficiency and
transparency of public administration. A focus on the education and training of government
personnel is needed to ensure that they can efectively use information systems and work
together to improve the eficiency and transparency of public administration.</p>
      <p>The selection of countries such as Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Uruguay, Chile, and Argentina for
this study is based on rigorous criteria that reflect their prominent position in the Latin American
landscape and their commitment to adopting digital policies. Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia, for
instance, are leading economies in the region and have proven to be pioneers in the adoption
of digital initiatives. Meanwhile, Uruguay, Chile, and Argentina have positioned themselves
as models in terms of open data policies, showcasing notable advancements in promoting
interoperability. This selection of countries aims to ofer a balanced and representative view of
current interoperability trends in Latin America. Geographic representativeness, the magnitude
of open data initiatives, and the relevance of their policies on the international stage were
prioritized. In this way, the study seeks to provide valuable insights and contribute to the
international academic discourse on the subject, considering the particularities and challenges
presented by the region.</p>
      <p>The following section analyzes aspects of interoperability in the government portals of some
Latin American countries. The study surveyed below arises from the analyses carried out on
the government websites of these countries, considering the most relevant aspects of data
interoperability.</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>2.1. Brazil</title>
        <p>
          The complexity of public administration in Brazil has characteristics typical of a large territory
with a large population that stands out in Latin America. Currently, it is made up of more
than 5,560 municipalities throughout the entire territory that until 2003 had some autonomy to
purchase software and manage computer networks. It was in that year that the Secretary of
Logistics and Information Technology of the Ministry of Planning, Budget, and Management
decided to focus on interoperability. The decision was immediately supported by the state IT
entities represented by the Brazilian Association of State Entities [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">7</xref>
          ]. Moser [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">8</xref>
          ] argues that
centralization, although essential, is only a step towards democratizing data. The inclusion of
data generated by civil society, academic institutions, and NGOs is crucial to achieving truly
inclusive and diverse data management.
        </p>
        <p>In Brazil, there are various open data catalogs at the national, state, and municipal levels. The
Brazilian Open Dice Portal is a government initiative that has been instrumental in promoting
transparency and citizen participation in Brazil. This online resource has stood out as a
centralized platform for the publication and access to data sets generated by public institutions in the
country5. These catalogs typically provide detailed information about each dataset, including
its description, format, update date, relevant metadata, and download links. structure. This
makes it easier for users to identify and select the data sets of interest, as well as understand
their content and structure.</p>
        <p>In addition, open data catalogs in Brazil often implement advanced search functions and
iflters, allowing users to make specific queries and quickly access the desired information. This</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-1">
          <title>5Portal Brasileiro de Dados Abertos.http://dados.gov.br/</title>
          <p>contributes to improving usability and eficiency in accessing data, promoting its reuse and
value creation. The data sets available on the portal cover a wide range of areas, including
health, education, environment, security, transportation, and economy, among others. This
means that users can access a significant amount of information to explore various issues of
social and economic importance.</p>
          <p>
            In addition, the Brazilian Open Dice Portal aims to strengthen civic engagement. By providing
citizens with the information, they need to understand and evaluate government activities, the
platform fosters an active and informed citizenry. Citizens can use the data to monitor public
policies, participate in decision-making, and hold the government accountable. The Brazilian
government has implemented a series of policies and programs to promote the interoperability
of its information systems. One of the most important programs is the National Interoperability
System (SIN) [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">9</xref>
            ], which establishes the standards and protocols necessary to guarantee the
interoperability of government information systems. Another program is e-PING (Padrões de
Interoperabilidade de Governo Eletrônico) which is a set of interoperability norms and standards
for Brazilian electronic government, established in 2003. The main objective of e-PING is to
guarantee the interoperability of systems and services electronic devices used by the Brazilian
government, to improve the eficiency, transparency, and quality of public services provided to
citizens. However, it is necessary to address some challenges associated with open data catalogs
in Brazil. Among them is the need to improve the quality and constant updating of the data,
as well as the standardization of the formats and structures of the data sets to facilitate their
interoperability. Likewise, it is essential to promote awareness and training in the use of open
data catalogs, both by producers and users, to maximize their potential and benefits [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">10</xref>
            ].
          </p>
          <p>
            Janssen, Charalabidis, &amp; Zuiderwijk [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">10</xref>
            ] add another dimension to this debate, emphasizing
that the adoption of technologies and platforms is only a part of the equation. Education and
training are essential to ensure that the benefits of data management extend to the entire
population. This perspective is supported by López &amp; Criado [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">9</xref>
            ] and Instituto Nacional de
Tecnologia da Informação, ITI6, who highlight the importance of data accessibility and reuse
for all citizens. Furthermore, the Brazilian government has implemented programs such as
the National Interoperability System (SIN) and e-PING, which seek to establish standards
and protocols for interoperability. These initiatives reflect a concerted efort to ensure that
government computer systems are cohesive and eficient.
          </p>
          <p>While Brazil has made notable advances in data management and interoperability, there is
still work to be done. Collaboration between the government, civil society, and the academic
sector will be essential to overcome the remaining challenges and ensure that data management
in Brazil is truly inclusive and beneficial for all.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>2.2. Mexico</title>
        <p>The Mexican government has established a series of policies and programs to improve the
interoperability of government systems. The National Digital Strategy, for example, establishes
a framework for the digital transformation of government, which includes improving the</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-2-1">
          <title>6Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia</title>
          <p>instituto-nacional-de-tecnologia-da-informacao
da</p>
          <p>Informação.</p>
          <p>https://www.gov.br/pt-br/orgaos/
interoperability of systems and promoting collaboration between diferent government agencies
and entities7.</p>
          <p>Within this framework of digital transformation, the National Digital Platform (PDN) stands
out, an initiative of the Mexican government that seeks to centralize and standardize government
information to improve eficiency and transparency 8. The PDN focuses on the use of web services
and APIs for systems integration, the creation of platforms and tools for data and information
management, and the adoption of cybersecurity practices.</p>
          <p>Among the specific initiatives and projects that have been carried out to improve the
interoperability of systems in the Mexican government, the following can be mentioned: a) The
creation of the National Interoperability System (SNI), which aims to allow the integration of
diferent government information systems and interoperability between them. This system is
based on the use of common standards and protocols, such as the XML language and the use of
web services9; b) The adoption of the Unique Digital Identity (IDU) as a common standard for
the identification and authentication of users in government systems. This allows citizens to
access diferent government services more easily and securely, without having to provide their
personal information each time they register in a new system.</p>
          <p>The National Digital Platform (PDN) is a Mexican government initiative to centralize and
make government information accessible to foster transparency, improve the eficiency of public
services, and promote data-based decision-making. The National Digital Platform uses
state-ofthe-art technologies, such as the blockchain, to guarantee the security and authenticity of the
data. In addition, it promotes system interoperability by using open standards and provides
APIs for data access. In this way, the PDN is an essential tool for the digital transformation of
the Mexican government.</p>
          <p>The creation of the Open Data Portal of the Government of Mexico, allows access and reuse of
public information by citizens, companies, and civil society organizations. This portal is based
on open data standards and promotes the interoperability of systems through the publication of
data in common and reusable formats10.</p>
          <p>
            The Mexican government has promoted the creation of an open data catalog at the national
level to promote transparency and access to public information. This catalog, hosted by the
National Transparency Platform (PNT), centralizes defective data sets by various government
institutions 11. Through the catalog, users can explore and download data in open formats,
which encourages the reuse of information for various purposes, such as research, application
development, and knowledge generation. The open data catalog in Mexico not only includes
data sets from the Federal Government but also from state and municipal governments that
have adopted transparency and openness policies [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">11</xref>
            ].
          </p>
          <p>
            Other authors, Pérez and Rodríguez [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">12</xref>
            ] have pointed out how the National Digital Strategy
stands as a pillar in this modernization process. This strategy, supported by oficial documents
from the Government of Mexico12, not only seeks process digitalization but also the creation of
7Portal de Datos Abiertos del Gobierno de México. https://datos.gob.mx/
8Gobierno de México. https://www.plataformadigitalnacional.org/about
9Sistema Nacional de Transparencia. https://www.plataformadetransparencia.org.mx/
10Portal de Datos Abiertos del Gobierno de México. https://datos.gob.mx/
11Sistema Nacional de Transparencia. https://www.plataformadetransparencia.org.mx/
12Estrategia Digital Nacional.
an ecosystem where interinstitutional collaboration becomes the norm. The idea is for diferent
government entities to eficiently share information and resources, eliminating redundancies,
and improving the citizen’s experience. Within this ecosystem, the National Digital Platform
(NDP) stands out as a key tool. As noted by Ramírez [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">13</xref>
            ], the NDP not only centralizes
information but also employs advanced technologies such as web services, APIs, and blockchain
to ensure data security and authenticity. This centralization and securitization are essential for
instilling trust in citizens and ensuring that the provided information is current and relevant.
However, centralizing information is not enough if systems cannot communicate with each
other. In this regard, García and López [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">14</xref>
            ] address the relevance of the National Interoperability
System13. The NIS aims to have diferent government systems "speak" the same language, using
common languages and protocols like XML and web services. This interoperability is crucial
for information to flow eficiently and for citizens not to have to provide the same information
multiple times on diferent platforms.
          </p>
          <p>
            Furthermore, for digital transformation to be efective, citizens need to interact with the
government simply and securely. Martínez and Sánchez [46] emphasize the importance of the
Unique Digital Identity (UDI) in this process. The UDI allows citizens to uniformly identify and
authenticate themselves in various government services, simplifying access to these services
and enhancing information security. On the other hand, transparency is a key element in
any government modernization process. Rodríguez and Mendoza [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">15</xref>
            ] discuss the role of the
Government of Mexico’s Open Data Portal in this regard. By providing data in common and
accessible formats, the portal not only promotes transparency but also encourages citizen
participation and enables third parties to use this data to generate knowledge and value.
          </p>
          <p>Digital transformation in the Mexican government is a complex process involving multiple
facets, from centralizing information to promoting transparency and citizen participation.
Although there are challenges along the way, the ongoing initiatives and projects demonstrate
a clear commitment to continuous improvement and adaptation to the demands and needs of
the digital era. It is essential to maintain this momentum and continue working together to
ensure a modern, eficient public administration that serves the citizens.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>2.3. Colombia</title>
        <p>
          Interoperability and the open data catalog play a key role in the context of public administration
in Colombia. These aspects are essential to promote transparency, eficiency, and citizen
participation in access to public information [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">16</xref>
          ]. In Colombia, some various regulations
and policies promote the interoperability and integration of computer systems in the public
sector. Some of them include the National Information and Communications Technology Policy,
Decree 1078 (2015), Law 1341 (2009) and Resolution 2416 (2016). The Colombian government
has implemented a series of initiatives to improve technological infrastructure and connectivity
throughout the country. This has allowed a greater integration of the computer systems of
diferent government entities. Despite advances in technological infrastructure and regulations,
the interoperability of Colombian government information systems remains a challenge. Many
government entities operate isolated systems and there is no efective integration between
them.
        </p>
        <p>13Sistema Nacional de Interoperabilidad. Gobierno de México</p>
        <p>The open data catalog in Colombia not only includes information from the public sector
but also incorporates data generated by civil society, nongovernmental organizations, and
academic institutions. This broadens the diversity and scope of the available data sets, fostering
the collaboration and participation of diferent actors in the generation and dissemination of
relevant information. The Datos.gov.co portal is an initiative of the National Government of
Colombia, led by the Ministry of Information and Communication Technologies (MinTIC) and
the National Digital Government Agency (ANGD). Through this portal, it seeks to promote the
openness and transparency of government data, and allow its access and reuse by citizens. The
Ministry of Information and Communication Technologies has led the “Online Government”
project, which seeks to integrate the computer systems of government entities to improve
the provision of public services. One of the most important programs is the Interoperability
Reference Framework (IMR), which establishes the standards and protocols necessary to ensure
that government information systems can communicate with each other efectively.</p>
        <p>Some of the challenges in the interoperability of Colombian government information
systems14 include the lack of standardization that makes it dificult to share data between diferent
government entities since the data is in diferent formats; lack of coordination between agencies
with diferent priorities and objectives that make collaboration and cooperation dificult; and
resistance to change. However, there are opportunities to improve interoperability through the
adoption of emerging technologies, training, and strengthening the culture of collaboration
among government entities.</p>
        <p>However, there are challenges associated with the open data catalog in Colombia that require
attention. One of them is to guarantee the quality and constant updating of the data sets, as well
as the veracity and integrity of the published information. Likewise, it is necessary to improve
the usability and accessibility of catalogs, ensuring that users can perform intuitive searches
and easily find the data they need.</p>
        <p>Although eforts have been made to promote open data and interoperability in the Colombian
public sector, there is still little participation by some public entities in the publication of open
data and the implementation of interoperability standards. This limits the scope and availability
of open data sets.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>2.4. Uruguay</title>
        <p>Uruguay has developed an interoperability policy for the public sector that seeks to establish
the necessary guidelines so that information systems can share data and services eficiently and
securely, and thus improve the quality of citizen care. This interoperability policy is framed in
the Law on Access to Public Information (Law No. 18.381), which establishes that all information
in the framework of public management is a public good that must be available to citizens
and dealt with transparency. Established a series of initiatives and policies to promote data
interoperability by creating the Agency for Electronic Government and the Information and
Knowledge Society (AGESIC) and has led these eforts, developing the Interoperability and
Standards Framework (MIyE) as a guide for the integration of data and systems.</p>
        <p>14Revisión del Gobierno Digital en Colombia: Hacia un Sector Público Impulsado por el Ciudadano. https:
//www.oecd.org/publications/revision-del-gobierno-digital-en-colombia-9789264292147-es.htm</p>
        <p>The National System for Productive Transformation and Competitiveness (Transforma
Uruguay) is in charge of leading the implementation of the interoperability policy in Uruguay.
The program has developed a series of initiatives to promote interoperability between the
diferent State information systems, such as a) A catalog of interoperability services that allows
information systems to share services and data more eficiently and securely. This catalog
includes services such as user authentication, information consultation, and data validation; b)
A methodological guide for the design and implementation of interoperability services, which
serves as a reference for developers of information systems in the public sector. This guide
describes the steps required to design and implement interoperability services, from defining
the requirements to commissioning and monitoring the services; c) A business architecture
model that makes it possible to align information systems with the strategic objectives of
the government and guarantee interoperability between them. This model defines the key
components of the enterprise architecture and describes how these components interact with
each other to support government business processes.</p>
        <p>Regarding interoperability standards and protocols, the Uruguay Digital Government website
uses open standards and technologies for the development of its online services, such as HTML,
CSS, JavaScript, and JSON. In addition, it is in the process of implementing the SOA (Service
Oriented Architecture) interoperability standard for the integration of diferent government
systems and platforms. The open data catalog in Uruguay is a key tool to facilitate access
and reuse of public information by citizens. The Uruguayan Government has developed the
Datos.gub.uy portal, which functions as the main open data repository in the country. The open
data catalog in Uruguay, through Datos.gub.uy, has fostered transparency and accountability,
allowing citizens to access relevant information and use it to make informed decisions, monitor
government performance, and develop innovative projects.</p>
        <p>This has allowed a greater integration of the computer systems of diferent government
entities. Despite advances in technological infrastructure and regulations, the interoperability
of Colombian government information systems remains a challenge. Many government entities
operate isolated systems and there is no efective integration between them.
2.5. Chile
One of the main programs for the promotion of interoperability in Chile is the Electronic
Government program, which aims to improve the quality of public services and government
transparency through the use of information and communication technologies. In this sense,
the Chilean government has developed an online services platform, which integrates more than
800 procedures and online services ofered by diferent public entities. This platform allows
citizens and companies to conduct procedures and requests electronically, avoiding the need to
hide from public ofices.</p>
        <p>Regarding the interoperability of the Chilean government’s computer systems, work has
been done on the definition of standards and protocols for the exchange of information between
the diferent government systems and platforms. In this sense, the SOA (Service Oriented
Architecture) interoperability standard has been adopted for the integration of diferent government
systems and platforms.</p>
        <p>In addition, the Chilean government’s open data portal has been created, which allows
citizens and companies to access public information from diferent government agencies and
areas. This portal is in line with open data and government transparency initiatives worldwide.
Another important initiative in terms of interoperability in Chile is the National Territorial
Information System (SNIT), which is an integrated geospatial information platform that allows
access to information from diferent agencies and government areas related to territory and the
environment. This platform uses open standards and technologies for the integration of diferent
government systems and platforms. One of the most prominent catalogs in Chile is Datos.gob.cl,
managed by the Digital Government Agency (AGD). The catalog houses a wide range of data
sets from various government entities in Chile. This includes data produced by ministries,
statistical institutes, municipalities, and other agencies. The catalog includes data analysis and
visualization tools that allow users to interactively explore and understand information. These
tools make it easy to create charts, maps, and visual aids that help identify patterns, trends, and
relationships in data. This promotes a deeper understanding of the information and encourages
its use in the generation of knowledge and decision-making.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-5">
        <title>2.6. Argentina</title>
        <p>One of the main objectives of government interoperability in Argentina is to simplify and
expedite the procedures and services that citizens need to carry out before the State. In Argentina,
the government has taken important measures to promote the interoperability of systems and
improve the eficiency of the public administration as a whole. One of the main instruments to
achieve this is the Law on Access to Public Information No. 27,275, sanctioned in 2016, which
establishes a legal framework for the implementation of open data policies and the promotion
of interoperability of systems in the public sector. The Distance Procedures Platform (TAD),
which allows citizens to carry out procedures online with diferent state agencies, was created
in 2012 and currently has more than 1000 procedures available.</p>
        <p>In addition, the government has worked on the implementation of common standards and
protocols to ensure interoperability between diferent government systems. The Biometric
Authentication System for the National Registry of People (Renaper) has also been developed,
which allows the identification and authentication of people using biometric technology. One
of these standards is the Digital Identity System (SID), which allows citizens to have a unique
digital identity to access diferent online services.</p>
        <p>Another important initiative is the Electronic Document Management System (GDE), which
allows the electronic management of documents and files in the public sector. The system is
designed to be interoperable and allows integration with other government systems.</p>
        <p>
          In Argentina, “the data catalogs represent a list of data assets of a state agency with their
corresponding metadata, which describes what they are and how they can be used. This helps
you find and better understand public data on a given topic. The concept of the data sets, better
known as datasets, refers to the fundamental part of the entire data catalog, that is, the group
of one or more data resources. Maintaining quality in datasets and their catalogs, makes correct
accessibility possible for citizens, for example, what these concepts go together” [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">5</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>In summary, the interoperability analysis of each country fulfills a key aspect in the digital
transformation, and as explained above, diferent initiatives and projects have been conducted
to improve it. Although there are still challenges and opportunities for improvement in this area,
the diferent governments are committed to the continuous improvement of the interoperability
of systems to guarantee eficiency and efectiveness in the provision of public services. One
of the challenges associated with the open data catalog is ensuring the quality and constant
updating of the information. It is necessary to establish clear processes for maintaining and
updating data sets, as well as feedback mechanisms and citizen participation to improve the
quality and relevance of the data provided.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Analysis of Open Data Catalogs</title>
      <p>For this work, a proposal of the relevance of open data catalogs that were extracted from the
government websites of the analyzed countries is analyzed.</p>
      <p>The objective of this study is to validate the content of these files through the software
developed by the authors, which presents a series of validation criteria that were considered
for the Argentine Republic. The choice of said country was since a series of criteria explained
on its government website for their analysis were identified, which allowed the design of a
prototype oriented to these validation aspects. It should be noted that the criteria proposed for
this country are considered good international practices, developed on its oficial website 151617.</p>
      <p>
        This research work is an expansion of studies carried out [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18 ref19">17, 18</xref>
        ]. This new proposal presents
an analysis approach especially in:
a) Current status of the content of open data catalogs used in government portals in Latin
America (some countries were analyzed as a sample), which is explained in the section “Open
Data Interoperability in Latin America”.
b) Sample of oriented Open Data catalogs.
c) Use of a validation software prototype that results in a quality status of the content of the
catalog structure for CKAN18, which is a tool developed by the Open Knowledge Foundation.
d) Flaws detected and proposals for improvements in the analysis carried out in this
investigation.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>3.1. Data Sample</title>
        <p>There are numerous open data catalogs in various Latin American countries. Various government
websites were analyzed, some of these are: a) Brazil1920; b) Mexico2122; c) Colombia2324; d)
15Datos Argentina. https://datos.gob.ar/
16Ministerio de Salud. Datasets. http://datos.salud.gob.ar/dataset
17Perfil de Aplicación Nacional de Metadatos para Datos Abiertos.
paquete-apertura-datos/perfil-metadatos/
18The world’s leading open source data management system. https://ckan.org/
19Portal da Transparência da Mobilidade Urbana de Natal. http://dados.natal.br/
20Portal de Dados Abertos da Cidade do Recife. http://dados.recife.pe.gov.br/
21La plataforma cívica de datos abiertos de México. https://datamx.io/
22Gobierno de la Ciudad de México. https://datos.cdmx.gob.mx/
23Alcaldía de Santiago de Cali. http://datos.cali.gov.co/dataset
24Datos Abiertos Bogotá. https://datosabiertos.bogota.gov.co/
https://datosgobar.github.io/
Uruguay2526; e) Chile2728; Argentina2930, and it was found that these countries have decentralized
repositories by commune, municipality, locality, city, and state as appropriate, in addition to a
central repository of federal aspect.</p>
        <p>Table 1 shows the number of datasets identified by government websites and the number of
data types detected. It is observed that the types of open data formats are various, open data
formats allow interoperability between software, but there are public open data that are not in
a suitable standard format, for example, the open PDF format.</p>
        <p>In addition, in Table 1, it can be seen that the type of format most used in the analysis
sample is the CSV type, which remains one of the most standard formats in the selection of
data available in Latin American government portals.</p>
        <p>It is important to mention that, regarding the periodicity of the published datasets, it was
identified that they are updated daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, and annually. In addition,
there is a measurable aspect that is "AccrualPeriodicity", which corresponds to the updating
of the data, every 10 years, every 4 years, every 2 years, every 1 year, every 4 months, every
2 months, twice a month, three times a month, once a week, among others. For example, in
Argentina, approximately 50% of the datasets are updated monthly.</p>
        <p>In the next subsection, the validations carried out with the software prototype made are
briefly explained.</p>
        <p>25Catálogo de Datos Abiertos. https://catalogodatos.gub.uy/
26Bienvenidos al Portal de Datos Abiertos de Montevideo. https://ckan.montevideo.gub.uy/
27Datos.gob el repositorio de datos abiertos centralizado del Estado. https://datos.gob.cl//
28Consejo para la transparencia. https://www.consejotransparencia.cl/datosabiertos/
29Datos Argentina. https://datos.gob.ar/
30Ministerio de Salud. Datasets. http://datos.salud.gob.ar/dataset</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>3.2. Validation Software Prototype</title>
        <p>A prototype was developed for the validation of part of the sample that, through a processing
script in Python, processes the open data catalogs in JSON, that is, it analyzes the metadata
in JSON format, usually called “data.json”. This prototype generates two reports as a result
in which the analysis of the structure of open data catalogs is shown. This is done using the
methods provided by the “pydatajson” library43. It is validated that:
• The URL present in the open data catalog field is available (through the UrlValidator field).
• The script validates that the files associated with the distributions are consistent formats
(through the ConsistentDistributionFieldsValidator field).
• It is validated that there are no duplicate elements (through the Theme Ids Not Repeated</p>
        <p>Validator field).</p>
        <p>In the new version that is in full development, graphics were integrated regarding the dataset
update frequency and its update to date according to its data type. Data from the DCAT-type
scheme was incorporated. Finally, improvements in the detection of processing errors, and
performance improvements, for example: pydatajson vendorization for changes and subsequent
PR, visualization of booleans instead of integers, messages cut of, bugs, and index array, are in
the testing phase. out bounds, null pointers, etc.</p>
        <p>In summary, the validation of the content of open data catalog files is carried out from two
approaches:
a) From the use of the Python library, called “pydatajson”: A validation is carried out
on certain fields in the catalogs that cannot be covered by the JSON Schema library. For
example, the landing pages of each dataset.</p>
        <p>The open data opening package indicates that it is mandatory that this link be present, and it
must be functional (accessible and with a satisfactory response code), this is what is validated.
Another custom validation is done for the access and download URLs of the distributions of
the data sets.</p>
        <p>Finally, it is verified that there are no taxonomically repeated catalogs in the files, this is
done through the topic ID. It is validated that the distributions have a specific format.
b) Through a proposed own development: Initial prototype uses a processing script in
Python language. This one has like functionality, receiving a list of CKAN – or Andino –
portal nodes, or raw metadata in JSON or XLS format, usually called “data.json” or “data.xlxs”
correspondingly.</p>
        <p>The developed script will generate two reports with a .CSV file extension, as a result of the
validation generated on the analyzed file of the open data catalog.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>3.3. Analysis of the results</title>
        <p>Based on the sample indicated in the previous section, the self-developed prototype was used,
to carry out a general study of the structures of the public data files that are available in the
government portals of Latin America.</p>
        <p>43GitHub. https://github.com/datosgobar/pydatajson</p>
        <p>It is worth mentioning that the prototype was developed with technical aspects that are used
in Argentine government portals, that is, a guide to good practices for metadata44, oriented to
CKAN, so that the analysis of results could focus on aspects of noncompliance for not taking
the same criteria of said country.
Brazil; Chile; ’superTheme’ is a re- For these countries, no LATAM It should have a taxonomy of those
Colombia; quired property. dataset has the “superTheme” prop- specified in45
Mexico; erty.</p>
        <p>Uruguay
Brazil; Chile; ’accrualPeriodicity’
Colombia; is a required property
Mexico; or value is invalid’
Uruguay
Brazil; Chile; ‘*’ is too short
Colombia;
Mexico;
Uruguay
Brazil; Chile; ‘*’ is too long
Colombia;
México;
Uruguay
Uruguay</p>
        <p>’*’ is not a uri
Brazil
’*’ is not a uri</p>
        <p>Some LATAM datasets do not have
the “accrualPeriodicity” property or
if they do, it does not have a valid
value.
730 of the 19921 LATAM datasets
have a very short field title.</p>
        <p>This field is the periodicity with
which the data set should be
updated.</p>
        <p>Minimum 4 characters.
71 of the 19921 LATAM datasets
have a very long field title.</p>
        <p>Maximum 60 characters.
79 of the 2408 Uruguay datasets It must be a URI. This is validated
do not have valid values in some by regex.
of their fields, such as
“downloadURL”.
56 of the 169 datasets from Brazil It must be a URI. This is validated
do not have valid values in some of by regex.</p>
        <p>their fields, such as “url”.</p>
        <p>Colombia
Colombia
Colombia
‘accessURL’ is a re- 1058 of the 3365 datasets for Colom- The property should contain the
acquired property bia do not have the “accessURL” cess URL of the dataset
distribu</p>
        <p>property. tion.
’issued’ is a required
property
‘downloadURL’ is a
required property</p>
        <p>In the sample dataset from Colom- The property should contain the
bia, none does not have the “issued” publication date of the dataset.
property.
2308 dataset from Colombia does
not have the “downloadURL”
property.</p>
        <p>URL that allows direct download
of the dataset distribution, links
directly to a downloadable file in a
given format.</p>
        <p>Table 2 is shown below, with the classification of aspects found grouped by type, some of the
errors are expected because the repositories of these countries do not comply with the open
data package of Argentina46. It should be noted that the types of errors indicated in Table 2 are
the validations used by the software prototype proposed by the recommendations suggested by
44Perfil de Aplicación Nacional de Metadatos para Datos Abiertos.
paquete-apertura-datos/perfil-metadatos/</p>
        <p>46Perfil de Aplicación Nacional de Metadatos para Datos Abiertos.
paquete-apertura-datos/perfil-metadatos/
https://datosgobar.github.io/
https://datosgobar.github.io/
the good practice guides of Argentina47. This country was taken as the standardized criterion
since it was one of the countries with the most detailed validations.</p>
        <p>It is important to mention that compared to the results obtained in Table 2, these are aspects
that were identified through the good practice guide of the Argentine Government 48. This
means that, although it is detected as an aspect to be considered by the prototype made, it might
not be a criterion that does not take you into account in the countries mentioned and identified
as a sample. Also shows a column of recommendations for the aspects detected in the structure
of public open data catalogues.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Conclusions and Future Lines</title>
      <p>Based on the work carried out on the study of the interoperability treatment of the diferent Latin
American countries, it can be observed that the concept of open government is increasingly
booming, which allows transparency in government management for all citizens. Being able to
share data in an open format together with your open data catalog will help diferent companies
consume this data and work on it to analyze possible improvement scenarios in diferent citizens
and their relevant contexts.</p>
      <p>Collaborating with an adequate structure in open data catalogs will help improve the quality
of interoperability management between the diferent software that share data so that they can
be processed and thus obtain information with added value in citizen contributions. This work
not only proposes a survey of the Latin American countries in aspects of the current state of
interoperability but also proposes a validation prototype of the structure of these metadata of
the data sets, that is, of the data catalogs. public open. These validations in these data structures
are necessary to provide a higher quality in the data content that is available to all people.</p>
      <p>In future lines, it is expected to increase the survey of countries in the context of open
data interoperability, and on the other hand, concerning the programmed prototype, work will
continue, adding new schemes that allow the management of the metadata of the diferent sets of
data that are available on the government sites of the diferent governments at an international
level. As another future proposal, possible aspects that could be standardized and that are
common criteria between the diferent open data catalogs will be analyzed, this will allow a
better reading, analysis, and interoperability between the diferent software, which will lead to
openness of data and transparency in the management of public governments.
https://datosgobar.github.io/
https://datosgobar.github.io/</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Maldonado Lozano</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L. Paredes</given-names>
            <surname>Aguilar</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Alvarado,
          <article-title>Open government management in public institutions: a review of the literature</article-title>
          , Sapienza:
          <source>International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies</source>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ). 47Perfil de Aplicación Nacional de Metadatos para Datos Abiertos.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>paquete-</surname>
          </string-name>
          apertura-datos/perfil-metadatos/ 48Perfil de Aplicación Nacional de Metadatos para Datos Abiertos.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
            <surname>Twizeyimana</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Andersson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The public value of e-government-a literature review</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Government information quarterly 36</source>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <fpage>167</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>178</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Naser</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Williner</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Sandoval</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Participación ciudadana en los asuntos públicos: un elemento estratégico para la agenda 2030 y el gobierno abierto</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L. F.</given-names>
            <surname>Luna-Reyes</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Najafabadi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The us open data initiative: The road ahead</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Information Polity</source>
          <volume>24</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <fpage>163</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>182</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Martínez</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Métricas de calidad para validar los conjuntos de datos abiertos públicos gubernamentales,
          <source>Ph.D. thesis</source>
          , Universidad Nacional de La Plata,
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Cadena-Vela</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Marco de referencia para la publicación de datos abiertos comprensibles basado en estándares</article-title>
          de calidad,
          <year>2019</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Eletrônico</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Ministério do planejamento, orçamento e gestão, secretaria de logística e tecnologia da informação; ministério da educação, secretaria de educação profissional e tecnológica: e-mag versão 3.0-modelo de acessibilidade em governo eletrônico</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Moser</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Ribeiro</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Silva</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Olivera</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Centralización y democratización de datos en américa latina: Un estudio de caso de brasil,
          <year>2023</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Lopez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>C. J.I</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Sistema nacional de interoperabilidade:
          <article-title>o caso brasileiro</article-title>
          .,
          <year>2019</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Janssen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Charalabidis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Zuiderwijk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Information systems management 29</source>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
          <fpage>258</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>268</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Styrin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L. F.</given-names>
            <surname>Luna-Reyes</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Harrison</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Open data ecosystems: an international comparison</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
          <fpage>132</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>156</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Perez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Rodriguez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Transformación digital en la administración pública</article-title>
          : El caso de méxico,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Ramirez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Lopez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>La plataforma digital nacional: Un paso hacia la modernización</article-title>
          .,
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Garcia</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Lopez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Interoperabilidad en sistemas gubernamentales: El reto del sni</article-title>
          .,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Rodriguez</surname>
          </string-name>
          , L. Mendoza, Datos abiertos en méxico: Retos y oportunidades,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. A. O.</given-names>
            <surname>Sanabria</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F. O. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Fernández</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. P. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Zabala</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Colombian case study for the analysis of open data government: A data quality approach</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance</source>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>389</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>394</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Martínez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Rodríguez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Vera</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Analysis of datasets and catalogs in government open portals of the argentine republic</article-title>
          , in: 2020 IEEE Congreso Bienal de Argentina (ARGENCON), IEEE,
          <year>2020</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>8</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <surname>R. e. a. Martinez,</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Analysis of interoperability in the argentine republic. proposal: Prototype for the study of open data catalogs</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>