<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Challenges for Socially Responsible AI for Well-being</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Takashi Kido</string-name>
          <email>kido.takashi@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Keiki Takadama</string-name>
          <email>keiki@inf.uec.ac.jp</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Teikyo University, Advanced Comprehensive Research Organization</institution>
          ,
          <country country="JP">Japan</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>The University of Electro-Communications</institution>
          ,
          <country country="JP">Japan</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>The first viewpoint focuses on "Responsible AI at the Individual Level." This perspective seeks to understand the mechanisms necessary to shape an AI that considers personal well-being. With daily fluctuations in health conditions, AI should recognize how digital interactions impact emotions and the quality of life</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>In this AAAI Spring Symposium 2023, we discuss Socially Responsible AI for Well-being. For AI to truly benefit society, it must go beyond mere productivity and economic advantages; embrace social responsibility; and emphasize fairness, transparency, safety, and other key principles. For instance, AI diagnostic systems should not only be accurate but also free from bias, ensuring equitable data representation across races and locations. This highlights the need for ongoing discussions on the nature of "social responsibility" in AI applications. There are two main perspectives: (1) Individually Responsible AI: Focuses on designing AI systems that consider individual well-being, such as understanding how digital experiences influence emotions and quality of life. (2) Socially Responsible AI: Emphasizes broader societal impacts, striving for decisions that are fair and beneficial for all. Addressing biases in AI is crucial to achieving fairness. Additionally, the knowledge produced by AI, such as health advice, should be universally applicable and not only beneficial to a subset of individuals. This paper outlines the underlying motivations, key terms, areas of focus, and research inquiries for this symposium.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>1 Socially Responsible AI</kwd>
        <kwd>Well-being</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Motivation</title>
      <p>For our well-being, AI is insufficient to achieve
rapid growth or to dominate the economy. AI
must adhere to principles of fairness, transparency,
accountability, reliability, safety, privacy, and
security. Taking an AI diagnostic system as an
example, although it is essential to provide
accurate results with clear explanations, it is
equally crucial that such results are derived from
unbiased data. This ensures an equitable
representation across different races and regions.
As AI decisions influence the quality of life, it is
vital to define "social responsibility" in the
upcoming AI era.</p>
      <p>The second viewpoint centers on "AI with
Societal Responsibility." This perspective aims to
understand the considerations for integrating
societal values with AI to improve overall
wellbeing. An integral aspect of this responsibility is
ensuring fairness in AI decisions so that they
benefit everyone. Addressing AI bias is vital.
Furthermore, AI-generated health insights such as
sleep tips for one individual might not be relevant
to another, emphasizing the importance of
universally beneficial knowledge. To address
these concerns, it is essential to develop methods
that prevent AI from inheriting human bias and
that ensure fairness and societal responsibility.</p>
      <p>We invite both technical and philosophical
conversations centered on "Socially Responsible
AI for Well-being" as it relates to the ethical
design and deployment of machine learning,
robotics, and social media, among other areas.
Topics such as clear predictions, trustworthy
social media practices, beneficial robotics, using
AI/VR to combat loneliness, and advocating
health are integral to our discussion.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Our Scope of Interest</title>
      <p>We plan to explore key interdisciplinary issues
that will shape the future direction of Socially
Responsible AI for Well-being. The following
scope of interest is the focal point of our
symposium:
2.1.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Individually Responsible AI</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>1. Interpretable AI</title>
        <p>Interpretable AI seeks to comprehend AI’s
decisions and actions. This involves
understanding how AI results are responsible for
well-being. To address this, it is essential to
develop advanced tools that can elucidate the
operation of deep neural networks and various
analytical techniques. We advocate both
theoretical and empirical studies to understand the
strengths and weaknesses of present AI/ML
technologies in the context of interpretable AI for
well-being. Areas of interest encompass but are
not restricted to interpretable AI for precision
medicine, accountability of black-box prediction
models, interpretability of machine learning
systems, interpretability in human/robot
communications, establishing trust in AI, and
using social computing to foster trust in
humancentric computational systems.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>2. How can human well-being be defined and measured?</title>
        <p>To ensure that the outcomes genuinely enhance
well-being, we must first establish and quantify
the meaning of well-being. This pursuit paves the
way for new success metrics for individually
tailored responsive AI. We welcome
contributions from various fields, including
positive psychology, positive computing,
predictive medicine, studies on human well-being,
neuroscience behind happiness, cultural
algorithms, studies on thriving environments, and
cross-cultural assessments of well-being.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>3. Dynamical change in well-being</title>
        <p>To address the dynamic shifts in human health,
it is essential to delve into cutting-edge machine
learning techniques and incorporate them into
individually tailored Responsible AI. We covered
areas such as deep learning, data mining, wellness
knowledge modeling, monitoring shifts in health
accuracy and efficiency, collective intelligence,
life log analytics (vital data and Twitter-based
insights), data representation, human-centered
computing, biomedical data management, and
tailored medical care. We invite dialogue to assess
the potential and constraints of the existing
technological approaches.
2.2.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Socially Responsible AI</title>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>1. How can fairness be defined and measured?</title>
        <p>From the perspective of well-being, AI should
deliver equitable and unbiased outcomes to all its
users. To address this, we need to initially
delineate what "Fairness" means in the context of
well-being, guiding us toward novel benchmarks
for Socially Responsible AI. We welcome
interdisciplinary studies that cover but are not
confined to standards and metrics for fairness,
equity in robotics, machine learning, social
platforms, systems with human involvement,
collective frameworks, causal inference for
fairness comprehension, simulations involving
multiple agents for fairness insights,
gametheoretical fairness evaluations, contrasts between
human prejudices and algorithmic biases, biased
evaluations of social platforms, and analyses of
political orientations.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>Knowledge applicability for well-being</title>
        <p>To explore health-centric information that can
benefit a wide audience, we invite both empirical
and technical studies. The areas of interest
encompass but are not restricted to the analysis of
social data and design of social relations, mood
tracking, healthcare communication
infrastructures, conversational AI systems,
insights into individual behaviors, explorations
into 'Kansei', creativity zones, compassion,
calming technology, the principles of Kansei
engineering, gamification, support tools,
technologies such as Ambient Assisted Living
(AAL), medical recommendation systems, elderly
care systems, web services for personal wellness,
games for health and happiness, digital health
diaries, trials for disease amelioration (such as
metabolic issues or diabetes), sleep enhancement
studies, support systems for disabled people, and
community computing platform.</p>
        <sec id="sec-4-2-1">
          <title>2.3. Ethical</title>
          <p>Humanity”</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-2-2">
          <title>Issues on “AI and</title>
          <p>It is imperative to cultivate effective
human–AI collaborations to foster trust and
acceptance of AI outcomes. We encourage
contemplative discussions centered on ethics and
philosophy related to this. Key subjects of interest
comprise the juxtaposition of machine
intelligence and human cognition, the
ramifications of AI on societal constructs and
human thought processes, challenges posed by
misinformation (or 'infodemics') via social
platforms, and notions of individual identity,
among others.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>3. Conclusion</title>
      <p>In this paper, we discuss the inspiration,
technical aspects, and philosophical concerns
associated with "Socially Responsible AI for
well-being.” As the planners and coordinators of
the AAAI23 symposium, our goal is to
disseminate the most recent advancements,
existing obstacles, and the prospective benefits of
AI implementations. Evaluating digital
interactions and gaining insights into human
wellbeing are central themes.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>4. Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>We would like to thank the program
committees of this symposium for their assistance.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>5. References</title>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>AI for Well-Bing”</article-title>
          ,
          <source>AI Magazine</source>
          , Volume
          <volume>44</volume>
          ,
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <issue>Issue 2</issue>
          ,
          <year>Summer 2023</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>211</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>212</lpage>
          ,
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          002/aaai.12092 [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kido</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Takadama</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,The Challenges
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          2022
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Spring</given-names>
            <surname>Symposia</surname>
          </string-name>
          , How Fair is Fair?
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>March</surname>
          </string-name>
          21-23,
          <year>2022</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3</lpage>
          , https://ceur-
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          ws.org/Vol-3276/SSS-22_opening1.pdf [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kido</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Takadama</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , The Challenges
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Embeddedness- AAAI</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2019</year>
          Spring
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Embeddedness</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Stanford, CA,
          <year>March</year>
          25-27,
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          2019, http://ceur-ws.
          <source>org/</source>
          Vol-
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          2448/SSS19_Paper_Upload_210.pdf [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kido</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Oono</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Swan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , The
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>AAAI2017 Spring symposia</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wellbeing</surname>
            <given-names>AI</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          27-
          <fpage>29</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>751</fpage>
          ,
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>https://cdn.aaai.org/ocs/15767/15767-</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          68317-
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -PB.pdf
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>