=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-354/paper-1
|storemode=property
|title=Preface, Conference Organisation and Table of Contents
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-354/llncsdesupp.pdf
|volume=Vol-354
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/iccs/EklundH08
}}
==Preface, Conference Organisation and Table of Contents==
Preface
This volume contains the supplementary proceedings of ICCS 2008, the 16th
International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS). The focus of the
ICCS conference is the representation and analysis of conceptual knowledge.
ICCS brings together researchers to explore novel ways that conceptual struc-
tures can be used.
Conceptual Structures are motivated by C.S. Peirce’s Existential Graphs and
were popularized by J. F. Sowa in the 1980’s. Over 16 years ICCS has increased
its scope to include innovations from a range of theories and related Conceptual
Structure practices, among them formal concept analysis and ontologies. There-
fore, ICCS presents a family of Conceptual Structure approaches that build on
techniques derived from artificial intelligence, knowledge representation, applied
mathematics and lattice theory, computational linguistics, conceptual modeling,
intelligent systems and knowledge management.
More than 70 papers were submitted to ICCS 2008 for peer review. All papers
were assessed by at least three referees one of whom was an Editorial Board mem-
ber who managed any necessary revisions. In 2008 ICCS adopted a two-tiered
publication strategy. The top-ranked 19 papers were published in Springer’s
LNAI series, P.W. Eklund and O. Haemmerlé (Eds.): ICCS 2008, LNAI 5113,
Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008 . A further 19 papers are published in
this supplementary proceedings and distributed as a hardcopy at the conference
and as a soft copy on the Web at CEUR-WS.
To qualify to be published in this volume, all supplementary papers had to
be recommended by a majority of its reviewers as well as satisfy the relevance,
quality and scope criteria enforced by the conference chairs.
We wish to thank the Organizing Committee individually: Nathalie Hernan-
dez, Cathy Comparot, Patrice Buche, Lydie Soler, Sophie Ebersold, Jean-Michel
Inglebert, Véronique Debats, Rémi Cavallo, and collectively the Editorial Board
and Program Committee members whose input underwrites the scientific quality
of the ICCS proceedings.
July, 2008 Peter Eklund
Ollivier Haemmerlé
Organization
ICCS Executive
General Chair Ollivier Haemmerlé (Université Toulouse le Mirail)
Program Chair Peter Eklund (University of Wollongong)
Local Chair Nathalie Hernandez (Université Toulouse le Mirail)
ICCS Adminstrative
Finance Cathy Comparot (Université Toulouse le Mirail)
Web site Patrice Buche (INRA Met@risk – Paris)
Lydie Soler (INRA Met@risk – Paris)
Network and Computers Jean-Michel Inglebert (Université Toulouse le Mirail)
Logistics Véronique Debats (IRIT – Toulouse)
Design Rémi Cavallo (Paris)
ICCS Editorial Board
Galia Angelova (Bulgaria)
Frithjof Dau (Germany)
Aldo de Moor (Netherlands)
Harry Delugach (USA)
Bernhard Ganter (Germany)
Pascal Hitzler (Germany)
Mary Keeler (USA)
Sergei Kuznetsov (Russian Federation)
Guy Mineau (Canada)
Bernard Moulin (Canada)
Marie-Laure Mugnier (France)
Heather D. Pfeiffer (USA)
Simon Polovina (UK)
Uta Priss (UK)
Henrik Schärfe (Denmark)
John F. Sowa (USA)
Rudolf Wille (Germany)
Karl-Erich Wolff (Germany)
Peter Øhrstrøm (Denmark)
VII
ICCS Program Committee
Radim Belohlavek (USA)
Tru Cao (Vietnam)
Dan Corbett (USA)
Madalina Croitoru (UK)
Juliette Dibie-Barthélemy (France)
Pavlin Dobrev (Bulgaria)
David Genest (France)
Udo Hebisch (Germany)
Joachim Hereth Correia (Germany)
Richard Hill (UK)
Adil Kabbaj (Morocco)
Yannis Kalfoglou (UK)
Markus Kroetzsch (Germany)
Leonhard Kwuida (Switzerland)
Sim Kim Lau (Australia)
Robert Levinson (USA)
Michel Liquière (France)
Philippe Martin (France)
Engelbert Mephu Nguifo (France)
Jorgen Fischer Nilsson (Denmark)
Sergei Obiedkov (Russian Federation)
John Old (UK)
Anne-Marie Rassinoux (Switzerland)
Gary Richmond (USA)
Sebastian Rudolph (Germany)
Eric Salvat (France)
Rallou Thomopoulos (France)
William Tepfenhart (USA)
Thomas Tilley (Thailand)
G.Q. Zhang (USA)
Additional Referees
Sebastian Bader Michel Chein Amanda Ryan
Peter Becker Vincent Dubois Bastian Wormuth
Patrice Buche Maxime Morneau
Table of Contents
Using Automatically Generated Students’ Clickable Conceptual Models
for E-tutoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
I. Pascual-Nieto, D. Péréz-Marin, P. Rodrı́guez, and M. O’Donnell
Operational Specification for FCA using Z . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Simon Andrews and Simon Polovina
Ontology Mapping Using Fuzzy Conceptual Graphs and Rules . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Patrice Buch, Juliette Dibie-Barthélemy and Liliana Ibanescu
Conceptual Graphs with Relators and Roles A GFO Coined View onto
CGs Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Alexander Heußner
Incorporating Probabilistic Knowledge in HealthAgents: a Conceptual Graph
Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Madalina Croitoru, Srinandan Dasmahapatra and Paul Lewis
Using Concept Lattices as a Visual Assistance for Attribute Selection . . . . . 41
Jean Villerd, Sylvie Ranwez and Michel Crampes
Modelling a dynamic process in the conceptual graph model: extension
needed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Jean-Rémi Bourguet, Bernard Cuq, Amadou Ndiaye, and Rallou Tho-
mopoulos
Representing a Computer Science Research Organization on the ACM
Computing Classification System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
Boris Mirkin, Susana Nascimento, and Luis Moniz Pereira
Spatial information fusion: Coping with uncertainty in conceptual structures 66
Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr, Robert Jeansoulin and Henri Prade
Semantic Annotation of Texts with RDF Graph Contexts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
H. Cherfi, O. Corby, C. Faron-Zucker, K. Khelif and M.T. Nguyen
On concept lattices and implication bases from reduced contexts . . . . . . . . . 83
Vaclav Snasel, Martin Polovincak, Hussam M. Dahwa, and Zdenek Ho-
rak
An FCA classification of durations of time for textual databases . . . . . . . . . 91
Ulrik Sandborg-Petersen
An Automated Conceptual Catalogue for the Enterprise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
Richard Hill and Simon Polovina
IX
Towards a Conceptual Structure based on Type theory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
Richard Dapoigny and Patrick Barlatier
A Contribution of a Multi-Viewpoints Semiotics to Knowledge Represen-
tation Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
Daniel Galarreta
Semantic Networks to Support Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
Philippe A. Martin
ReCollection: a Disposal/Formal Requirement-Based Tool to Support Sus-
tainable Collection Making . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
Francis Rousseaux, Alain Bonardi and Benjamin Roadley
Finite State Automata and Simple Conceptual Graphs with Binary Con-
ceptual Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
Galia Angelova and Stoyan Mihov
A Framework for Ontology Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
Muhammad Fahad and Muhammad Abdul Qadir
Information Fusion using Conceptual Graphs: a TV Programs Case Study 158
Claire Laudy and Jean-Gabriel Ganascia
X
Using Automatically Generated Students’
Clickable Conceptual Models for E-tutoring
I. Pascual-Nieto, D. Péréz-Marin, P. Rodrı́guez, and M. O’Donnell
No Institute Given
Operational Specification for FCA using Z
Simon Andrews and Simon Polovina
No Institute Given
Ontology Mapping Using Fuzzy Conceptual
Graphs and Rules
Patrice Buch, Juliette Dibie-Barthélemy and Liliana Ibanescu
No Institute Given
Conceptual Graphs with Relators and Roles A
GFO Coined View onto CGs Relations
Alexander Heußner
No Institute Given
Incorporating Probabilistic Knowledge in
HealthAgents: a Conceptual Graph Approach
Madalina Croitoru, Srinandan Dasmahapatra and Paul Lewis
No Institute Given
Using Concept Lattices as a Visual Assistance
for Attribute Selection
Jean Villerd, Sylvie Ranwez and Michel Crampes
No Institute Given
Modelling a dynamic process in the conceptual
graph model: extension needed?
Jean-Rémi Bourguet, Bernard Cuq, Amadou Ndiaye, and Rallou Thomopoulos
No Institute Given
Representing a Computer Science Research
Organization on the ACM Computing
Classification System
Boris Mirkin, Susana Nascimento, and Luis Moniz Pereira
No Institute Given
Spatial information fusion: Coping with
uncertainty in conceptual structures
Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr, Robert Jeansoulin and Henri Prade
No Institute Given
Semantic Annotation of Texts with RDF Graph
Contexts
H. Cherfi, O. Corby, C. Faron-Zucker, K. Khelif and M.T. Nguyen
No Institute Given
On concept lattices and implication bases from
reduced contexts
Vaclav Snasel, Martin Polovincak, Hussam M. Dahwa, and Zdenek Horak
No Institute Given
An FCA classification of durations of time for
textual databases
Ulrik Sandborg-Petersen
No Institute Given
An Automated Conceptual Catalogue for the
Enterprise
Richard Hill and Simon Polovina
No Institute Given
Towards a Conceptual Structure based on Type
theory.
Richard Dapoigny and Patrick Barlatier
No Institute Given
A Contribution of a Multi-Viewpoints Semiotics
to Knowledge Representation Issues
Daniel Galarreta
No Institute Given
Semantic Networks to Support Learning
Philippe A. Martin
No Institute Given
ReCollection: a Disposal/Formal
Requirement-Based Tool to Support Sustainable
Collection Making
Francis Rousseaux, Alain Bonardi and Benjamin Roadley
No Institute Given
Finite State Automata and Simple Conceptual
Graphs with Binary Conceptual Relations
Galia Angelova and Stoyan Mihov
No Institute Given
A Framework for Ontology Evaluation
Muhammad Fahad and Muhammad Abdul Qadir
No Institute Given
Information Fusion using Conceptual Graphs: a
TV Programs Case Study
Claire Laudy and Jean-Gabriel Ganascia
No Institute Given