<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Rennes, France, June</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Towards the identification of key aspects for future scenarios of the information and communication technology sector's climate impact - Extended abstract</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Anna Furberg</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Göran Finnveden</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>KTH Digital Futures, KTH Climate Action Center, Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Sciences and Engineering</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>114 28, Stockholm</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="SE">Sweden</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2023</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>0</volume>
      <fpage>5</fpage>
      <lpage>09</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Reduced climate impacts of the information and communication technology (ICT) sector is required to redirect digital technologies towards sustainability. Life cycle assessment (LCA) can be used to quantify climate impacts of the ICT sector and identify hotspots. Several studies have assessed the direct climate impact of the global ICT sector and arrived at quite different conclusions regarding its future impacts. The aims of this paper are to identify key aspects for future scenarios in LCAs of the ICT sector's direct climate impact and to highlight related challenges. For this, a literature screening on direct climate impacts of the ICT sector was conducted. Preliminary findings indicate that for end-user devices, the number of units is a key aspect in influencing the climate impact of the future ICT sector. For telecommunication networks and data centers, the growth in data traffic and energy efficiency improvements are key aspects. In addition, the carbon intensity of electricity generation and the lifetime of products are key aspects for all ICT subdomains (i.e., end-user devices, telecommunication networks and data centers). These key aspects significantly influence the ICT sector's climate impact and need to be carefully considered in future studies. The authors future research includes to finalize the in-depth review and to develop a framework for LCAs of the ICT sector's direct impacts.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>1 Information and communication technology (ICT) sector</kwd>
        <kwd>greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint</kwd>
        <kwd>life cycle assessment (LCA)</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The purpose of digital technologies needs to be fundamentally redirected towards a deep
sustainability transition [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. More specifically, the environmental and social impacts of the information
and communication technology (ICT) sector must be reduced. To be able to reduce the impacts of the
ICT sector, including end-user devices, telecommunication networks, and data centers, it is important
that these impacts are assessed. It is also important that hotspots, such as specific processes that
contribute significantly to the ICT sector’s impacts, are identified. If hotspots are identified, resources
and actions can be directed to where they probably will enable the largest impact reductions. Life cycle
assessment (LCA) is commonly applied to assess impacts of the ICT sector, its subdomains or specific
ICT applications [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. It is a method that can be applied to identify hotspots by quantifying the impacts
of products, or services, over their entire life cycle, including the raw material extraction, production,
use and the waste management phase of the product [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        So far, several studies have assessed the climate impact, or the so-called greenhouse gas (GHG)
footprint, of the ICT sector, see e.g., [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] and [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. A recent review by Bieser et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ] conducted a
comparison of such studies published during the last ten years on the global ICT sector. Six studies
were identified in that review to focus on direct climate impacts (see Table 2 in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]). Direct climate
impacts here refer to GHGs emitted in the production (including raw material extraction), use and
disposal of ICT. Some of the studies also included future scenarios for emissions of GHGs, see e.g., [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]
and [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. Notably, the results for the future climate impact of the ICT sector in the reviewed studies,
which had various scopes in terms of e.g., time frames, types of end-user devices included, life cycle
phases considered, etc., differed quite a lot [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. In general, three different types of outcomes for the ICT
sector’s future climate impact were identified where it will either; i) increase significantly, ii) barely
increase or iii) remain rather stable. These different outcomes are in line with the acknowledged
controversy of discussions around current trends of digitalization and their environmental impacts [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ].
According to Bieser et al [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ], further LCA case studies on different types of end-user devices, and ICT
infrastructures, are needed in response to the large sources of uncertainties present in these types of
studies. In addition to the knowledge gaps identified by Bieser et al., there also exist other knowledge
gaps in need of attention. These include the general lack of clear motivations for, and descriptions of,
the future scenarios applied in studies of the ICT sector’s climate impact. Furthermore, the data
representativeness in these studies are seldom described in detail, making the interpretation of the study
results rather difficult. There is a need to identify the aspects that are the most important in influencing
the ICT sector’s climate impact and how these should be taken into consideration in the construction of
future scenarios.
      </p>
      <p>In response to these knowledge gaps, the aims of this paper are to identify key aspects for future
scenarios in LCAs of the ICT sector’s direct climate impact and to highlight related challenges. This
involves identifying and highlighting important factors that might significantly affect the climate impact
of the ICT sector both today and in the future. The intended audiences of this paper are researchers with
an interest in ICT sustainability, ICT manufacturers, ICT users and policy makers.
2.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Method</title>
      <p>
        In a first step, a literature screening on direct climate impacts of the ICT sector was conducted. The
method that will be applied in the continued research is an in-depth literature review of studies on the
direct climate impacts of the ICT sector with an emphasis on the six studies on the global climate impact
of the ICT sector included in the study by Bieser et al [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. These studies, e.g. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] and [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ], and the
review by Bieser et al [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ] itself, will all be reviewed in detail with a focus on identifying key aspects in
the construction of future scenarios for the ICT sector and its climate impact. Both scientific articles
and grey literature sources written in English will be included.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Results so far and future research</title>
      <p>
        Preliminary findings from the initial literature screening are summarized in Table 1. In addition,
general hotspots for specific subdomains of the ICT sector, in terms of life cycle phases, are also
presented in Table 1 based on Bieser et al [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. The key aspect identified for end-user devices
specifically, includes the number of units that are in use in the future ICT system, also involving the
types of units applied. In the reviewed studies, the estimated number of end-user devices in the scenario
representing the current situation were typically scaled up for the future scenario(s). Potential changes
in the ICT system, e.g., by the introduction of emerging ICTs, on the other hand, were in general not
considered. This is a challenge for these studies and problematic since the ICT sector is developing very
fast. For telecommunication networks and data centers, data traffic growth and energy efficiency both
constituted key aspects in influencing the climate impact of these ICT subdomains in the reviewed
studies. Estimating future changes in data traffic and energy efficiency improvements is challenging.
One way to handle this could be to construct several future scenarios as done in some of the reviewed
studies. In addition, some key aspects are relevant for more than one ICT subdomain. The carbon
intensity of electricity generation and the lifetime of products were identified to be important for
enduser devices, telecommunication networks as well as data centers. Particularly, in some of the reviewed
studies, the data applied, such as data on the carbon intensity of electricity generation, were selected to
be the same in both the current and future scenario(s). This suggests that there will be no differences in
the electricity generation system in the future compared to today, which seems unrealistic.
      </p>
      <p>In summary, the identified key aspects (Table 1) have a significant influence on the ICT sector’s
climate impact and the selections made for these aspects need to be carefully considered and clearly
motivated in future studies. Future research by the authors of this paper will include to finalize the
indepth review of studies on the ICT sector’s climate impact to provide a detailed overview of key aspects.
This will also include the identification of strategies employed in previous studies for future scenario
construction. Furthermore, a framework for LCAs of the ICT sector’s direct climate impacts will be
developed with the goal to provide recommendations to LCA practitioners on how to, for example,
handle challenges related to key aspects in the creation of future scenarios.
o
o</p>
      <p>Key aspects</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Growth in data volume/traffic</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Energy efficiency</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Growth in data volume/traffic</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>Energy efficiency</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-5">
        <title>Carbon intensity of electricity generation</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-6">
        <title>Lifetime of products</title>
        <p>ICT subdomain</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-7">
        <title>End-user devices</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-8">
        <title>Telecommunication networks</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-9">
        <title>Data centers All</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>The financial support from Ericsson, KTH Digital futures and KTH Climate Action Center is
gratefully acknowledged.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. References</title>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[1] Digitalization for Sustainability (D4S). Digital Reset. Redirecting Technologies for the Deep Sustainability Transformation</article-title>
          . (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <article-title>München: oekom</article-title>
          .
          <source>doi: 10.14512/9783987262463</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Arushanyan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Ekener-Petersen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Finnveden. Lessons</surname>
          </string-name>
          learned
          <article-title>- Review of LCAs for ICT products</article-title>
          and services,
          <source>Comp Ind</source>
          <volume>65</volume>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <fpage>211</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>234</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.compind.
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <volume>10</volume>
          .003
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Baumann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A.-M. Tillman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The Hitchhiker's Guide to LCA: An Orientation in Life Cycle Assessment Methodology</article-title>
          and Application, Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden,
          <year>2004</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Malmodin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Lundén</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>The Energy and Carbon Footprint of the Global ICT</article-title>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>E&amp;M Sectors</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2010</year>
          -2015, Sustain
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
          <fpage>3027</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3057</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/su10093027
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Belkhir</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Elmeligi</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: Trends to 2040 &amp; recommendations</article-title>
          ,
          <source>J Clean Prod</source>
          <volume>177</volume>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
          <fpage>448</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>463</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.jclepro.
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <volume>12</volume>
          .239
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. S. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Andrae</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Edler</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <source>On Global Electricity Usage of Communication Technology: Trends to</source>
          <year>2030</year>
          ,
          <volume>Chall 6</volume>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
          <fpage>117</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>157</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/challe6010117
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. C. T.</given-names>
            <surname>Bieser</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Hintemann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Hilty</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Beucker</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>A review of assessments of the greenhouse gas footprint and abatement potential of information and communication technology</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Env Imp Assess Rev</source>
          <volume>99</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <fpage>107033</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>107044</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.eiar.
          <year>2022</year>
          .
          <volume>107033</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Itten</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Hischier</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Andrae</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. C. T.</given-names>
            <surname>Bieser</surname>
          </string-name>
          et al.
          <article-title>Digital transformation-life cycle assessment of digital services, multifunctional devices and cloud computing</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Int J LCA</source>
          <volume>25</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>2093</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2098</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/s11367-020-01801-0.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>