<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>SeWebMeDa-</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1613-0073</issn>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>wounds⋆</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Elaine Taylor Whilde</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Janine Lane</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Chris Dickson</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Syeda Mah-e-Fatima</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Qurratal Ain Fatimah</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ali Hasnain</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="editor">
          <string-name>Chronic Wound, Artificial Intelligence, Woubot®</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Nine Health Global Ltd</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Leeds</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UK">UK</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Dublin</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>University Hospital Galway</institution>
          ,
          <country country="IE">Ireland</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>5</volume>
      <abstract>
        <p>Management of chronic wounds in healthcare disciplines is a huge financial burden on healthcare systems around the world. An estimated 1.5 - 2 million patients in Europe alone sufer from acute or chronic wounds at a given time. The mental and societal burden of living with a chronic wound is immense. Many studies have shown that treatment of these wounds conservatively (without surgery) is one of the major contributing factors to the cost, with wound dressings being a significant impactr. Data from the NHS shows that managing wounds properly such as choosing the appropriate dressing for the right wound and continuous appropriate treatment can significantly increase healing and reduce healthcare spending. Funded by the National Institute of Health Research and NHS England the AI in Health and Care Award Accelerated Access Collaborative (AAC) and NHS AI Lab supported AI technologies across the spectrum of development, from initial feasibility to evaluation within clinical pathways in the NHS and social care settings, to the point that they could be nationally commissioned. In this paper, the ifndings of a phase 1, project a feasibility study are introduced for discussion and shared learning about an artificial intelligence-based technology which aims in phase 2 to predict the development of hard to heal wounds and their rates of healing and produce recommendations for clinicians dealing with wound care. Woubot® will evaluate the risks of diferent wound treatments and predict and monitor the progression of wounds. Considering national guidelines on treatment as well as data available, improvements in practice will be recommended, and tailored treatment plans will be suggested for individual patients.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>CEUR</p>
      <p>ceur-ws.org
https://www.rcsi.com/people/profile/alihasnain (A. Hasnain)</p>
      <p>© 2022 Copyright for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
CEUR
Workshop
Proceedings</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Approximately 2.2 million patients currently have a chronic wound [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The annual NHS cost
of managing these wounds and associated comorbidities in 2017-18 was £8.3 billion. With 81%
of this spend in the community [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The annual prevalence of wounds rose by 71% between
2012-2013 and 2017-2018 with an increase in resource utilization of 48 % during this period [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
There is little information available at the time of writing post-Covid pandemic; however, it
would be a reasonable assumption that these figures are worsening. Up to 40% of chronic leg
wounds never heal, leading to serious complications and even death.
      </p>
      <p>
        Artificial Intelligence software name Woubot® is being developed to predict and produce a
series of personalized care recommendations for frontline clinicians based on national evidence.
There is considerable variation in practice and outcomes [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ] which increases care costs and
extends healing times [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] Starting with a prototype Application Programming Interface (API –
it will be able to link new software with current healthcare systems) developed in partnership
with the NHS and funded by the Artificial Intelligence in Health and Care Award, 1. we have
created a secure data processing environment managed by Nine Health Community Interest
Company NHCIC (part of the NHS family) and hosted by an accredited public sector data host.
Clinical algorithms have been developed based on national clinical evidence supporting the
work of the National Wound Clinical Strategy Programme (NWCSP)2 which will be tested in
this secure environment with the aim of monitoring and measuring adherence to these national
standards for wound care. The software will create a personalized care pathway with a series of
recommendations for use in the NHS via a mobile app. Most of this care will be delivered by
nurses and other healthcare professionals in clinics and the community. Recommendations,
whether for exercise, other lifestyle changes medication or dressings, will be individualized
for each patient based on their history and biological makeup (using predictive indicators) and
linked to the latest clinical evidence. Building on our understanding of what predicts those
at risk of developing hard-to-heal wounds we are designing a randomized controlled trial to
compare the use of the software tool against standard care for people with hard-to-heal wounds.
AI involved in this type of clinical support is classed as a medical device and needs formal
regulation via the UK’s Medical HealthCare products regulation Agency (MHRA). A clinical
trial in order to gather this evidence of efectiveness for this is essential. A lead for patient and
public involvement will ensure the study plan and ongoing support involves those accessing
services. The work will involve working together with NHS hospitals, networks, and facilities
in London and Yorkshire. The software will be available, after subsequent development, to the
wider NHS through its national innovative technology pathways, publication, and National
Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) . Artificial Intelligence software name Woubot®
is being developed to predict and produce a series of personalized care recommendations for
frontline clinicians based on national evidence. There is considerable variation in practice
and outcomes [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ] which increases care costs and extends healing times [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] Starting with a
prototype Application Programming Interface (API – it will be able to link new software
1Woubot® - an A.I. predictive system to produce personalized care recommendations for chronic lower limb
woundshttps://fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/AI_AWARD01723(lastaccessed:14/03/2022)
2National Wound Clinical Strategy programme. https://www.nationalwoundcarestrategy.net/about-the-nwcsp/
(lastaccessed:14/03/2022)
with current healthcare systems) developed in partnership with the NHS and funded by the
Artificial Intelligence in Health and Care Award we have created a secure data processing
environment managed by Nine Health Community Interest Company NHCIC (part of the NHS
family) and hosted by an accredited public sector data host. Clinical algorithms have been
developed based on national clinical evidence supporting the work of the National Wound
Clinical Strategy Programme (NWCSP) which will be tested in this secure environment with
the aim of monitoring and measuring adherence to these national standards for wound care.
The software will create a personalized care pathway with a series of recommendations for
use in the NHS via a mobile app. Most of this care will be delivered by nurses and other
healthcare professionals in clinics and the community. Recommendations, whether for exercise,
other lifestyle changes medication or dressings, will be individualized for each patient based
on their history and biological makeup (using predictive indicators) and linked to the latest
clinical evidence. Building on our understanding of what predicts those at risk of developing
hard-to-heal wounds we are designing a randomized controlled trial to compare the use of the
software tool against standard care for people with hard-to-heal wounds. AI involved in this
type of clinical support is classed as a medical device and needs formal regulation via the UK’s
Medical HealthCare products regulation Agency (MHRA). A clinical trial in order to gather this
evidence of efectiveness for this is essential. A lead for patient and public involvement will
ensure the study plan and ongoing support involves those accessing services. The work will
involve working together with NHS hospitals, networks, and facilities in London and Yorkshire.
The software will be available, after subsequent development, to the wider NHS through its
national innovative technology pathways, publication, and National Institute for Health and
Care Excellence (NICE)3.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>2. Background</title>
      <p>
        Wounds are prone to infection. They are distressing and painful and have a negative impact
on a patient’s mobility and quality of life. England’s community prescription costs are over
£110 million annually, with additional NHS costs. The global wound care market forecast is
24.8 billion US dollors by 2024 segmented into hospitals, clinics, and home healthcare2. An
estimated 278,000 NHS patients had venous leg ulcers (VLUs) in the UK in 2012. By 2025, over
ifve million patients in England will have diabetes, of which there is a 25% incidence of foot
ulcers. In people with diabetes, 80% of ulcers progress to amputation, and after one amputation
patients are twice as likely to have a second. With a five-year mortality rate of more than
50% in diabetes patients with foot ulcers and 80% in patients who have had a diabetes-related
amputation, diabetes foot ulcer five-year mortality rates are similar to or worse than many
types of common cancers [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4 ref5">4, 5</xref>
        ]. The inpatient cost of treating diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is
£6.6 million4 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. The mean cost of treating a single DFU is £7600 (£3,000 per patient healed
and £13,500 per patient unhealed). Globally, 3% of the total worldwide population have leg
ulcers with some patients having repeat cycles of healing and un-healing wounds. Many factors
3National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). https://www.nice.org.uk/(lastaccessed:14/03/2022)
4Diabetic foot problems: Prevention and management. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng19/evidence/
full-guideline--august-2015-pdf-15672915543 (last accessed:14/03/2022)
influence wound healing. Knowledge of the safety, clinical, and cost-efectiveness of thousands
of dressings is necessary. GPs and nurses usually manage wounds in the community and as of
now, there are 43,440 community nurses and 287,000 nurses in England5. The Department of
Health and Social Care NWCSP teams have produced an industry specification for application
suppliers to the NHS. These standards will be used to integrate with local NHS solutions in
Humberside and southwest London. The NWCSP has identified that the NHS needs:
• A more granular data capture for business and clinical purposes.
• Point-of-care mobile technology and apps.
• A national high-level specification (work in progress).
      </p>
      <p>• Supplier engagement.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>3. Related Work</title>
      <p>Specialist intellectual property lawyers performed a freedom-to-operate search and did not
identify any comparable products. There are a range of commercial wound measuring
applications on the market in the UK and EU some of which notably for example. Medinnoscan6
which is a Hungarian government-funded product uses AI to measure the size and nature of ]
the wounds. Nine Health Global is engaging over the next few months with Medinnoscan and
two of the main wound app suppliers to the NHS to explore potential integration into a single
app which will assess the wound, predicting outcomes and personalizing the wound care.</p>
      <p>One of the key diferentiators of working with health care data is its sensitivity and the
impact of a broad range of data laws on accessing, processing, and applying AI. Patients, the
public and clinicians need to be able to trust the AI and the analysis should be transparent with
the ability to track and audit results.</p>
      <p>The experience of joining an EU (FP7) framework7 award with 22 partners across eight
countries to create an info structure- the Virtual Physiological Human (VPH)8 laid the foundations
for Nine Health to translate this learning and ability to securely access and process health data
for use with practical commercially available AI products.</p>
      <p>Four flagship workflows (from @neurIST 9, euHeart10, VPHOP11, Virolab12) provided existing
data, tools, and models and engaged with the services developed by VPH-Share to drive the
development of the infostructure and pilot its applications.
5The number of nurses and midwives in the UK. https://fullfact.org/health/number-nurses-midwives-uk/(lastaccessed:
14/03/2022)
6MEDINNOSCAN. Medical Diagnostic Artificial Intelligence. https://medinnoscan.com/en/home-2/(lastaccessed:
14/03/2022)
77th Framework Programme for Research. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/de/MEMO_16_
146(lastaccessed:05/03/2022)
8Virtual Physiological Human: Sharing for Healthcare - A Research Environment. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/
id/269978(lastaccessed:05/03/2022)
9@neurIST- Integrated Biomedical Informatics for the Management of Cerebral Aneurysms. http://www.aneurist.
org/(lastaccessed:01/03/2022)
10euHeart - Matters of the Heart. http://www.euheart.eu/(lastaccessed:12/03/2022)
11Osteoporotic Virtual Physiological Human. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/223865(lastaccessed:05/03/2022)
12A Virtual Laboratory for Decision Support in Viral Disease Treatment. https://www.virolab.org/(lastaccessed:
05/03/2022)</p>
      <p>Data sources were usually pseudonymized clinical data from patients - sometimes with
population information. The project involved secure access and storage with annotation,
inference, complex image processing, and mathematical modelling. Following the successful
completion of VPH-share the NHCIC team then took the learning and knowledge into China
partnering with a Chinese SME Lantone in 2014 to create an artificially intelligent basic diagnosis
system for grass route doctors known as Diagbot13. Diagbot has enabled the development
of Woubot by developing the technology necessary to apply the principles of an artificially
intelligent diagnosis system to the complex treatment of a specific clinical area.</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>3.1. Diagbot</title>
        <p>Diagbot uses Chinese national clinical guidelines to create a robust evidence base from which
clinical algorithms (these flow charts or decision trees have been used manually and in basic
computer systems for the many years in the NHS and are developed by specialized clinical
reviewers and others nationally in many countries worldwide) can be run automatically on the
patient’s Electronic Medical Records (EMRs). The system uses Natural Language Processing
(whilst most health data is referred to as structured data in the UK, in China it was largely
unstructured text where understanding context etc. had to be extracted from digital copies of
handwritten notes) to identify clinical terms, these are then analyzed by searching for key fields
from the patient’s history such as symptoms, examination results, etc., which are trained via
neural networks (using patented mathematical models) producing a suggested diagnosis and
treatment recommendations based on the clinical evidence (as shown in Figure 1).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>4. Methodology</title>
      <p>Using knowledge and algorithms from the Woubot® prototype system the risks of diferent
wound healing approaches will be evaluated; predicting modifiable clinical outcomes such as
time to healing, time to amputation, and death; and identifying optimal treatment plans for
individual patients. Combining national assessment criteria with routinely reported data
(Hospital Episodes Statistics/Community Service Data Sets) plus local data collection, improvements
to prognosis and treatment will be created. Using unique algorithms to forecast patient risks
and outcomes based on profiling and other personalized physiology, resources will be targeted
efectively, especially where existing demand outstrips clinical capacity. The product will
increase diagnosis and treatment eficacy, saving wastage on inefective dressings and nursing
and clinical time, and reducing amputations and deaths. The automated workflow will increase
the speed of analysis and productivity, saving time and cost. Using patient pseudonymized data
sources, algorithms will accurately find and tailor data, automatically saving thousands of hours
of clinical and management time. A list of nationally validated wound assessment domains and
sub-domains (potential assessment criteria) is now launched in the NHS but mainly collected
manually. Woubot® will be informed by the following areas where existing data is collected:
• Clinical needs.
13Nine Health Global Clinical Systems. https://ninehealth.global/clinical-systems/(lastaccessed:12/03/2022)
• Pathologies showing an etiology that requires a multidisciplinary approach.
• Information flow for complex pathologies.
• Diagnostic tools and data.
• Related data, based on clinician’s experience.
• Experience to process a therapeutic decision
• Interpretation, bias, human error leading to misdiagnosis.</p>
      <p>The scale of data generated, processed, and exchanged would normally require massive
computing power and data storage, and sophisticated software tools. The secure NHCIC data
environment will enable:
• Model homogenization; and
• Algorithm distribution for various levels of modelling.</p>
      <p>
        Woubot® technology will automatically help predict those at risk of developing chronic
wounds and will be able to produce a series of recommendations for the clinician (healthcare
professional), usually a community nurse. It will evaluate the risks associated with diferent
wound healing approaches, predict clinical outcomes, and identify an optimal treatment plan for
each patient based on numerous factors. It will match a combination of products for that patient
from more than 70 cellular and tissue-based products available on the market, and more than
3,000 other advanced wound-dressing products. In phase 1, led by an advisory group to ensure
patient and public involvement from the spinal injury’s association and the National Wound
Clinical Strategy programme, a secure platform hosted by UK Cloud (NHCIC is a research data
organization with an NHS organizational code) for data sourced from Cegedim THIN14 and the
NHS Community Data set (NHS Humber Teaching Trust) using patient pseudonymized data
sources (which have gone through the double de-identification process). Data was reviewed
by a statistical expert to exclude bias and included a national sample from primary care and a
local sample from Hull and East Riding where the demographic includes both inner-city, city,
and rural and a diverse range of nationalities including Black, ethnic, and minority groups
aged 19-80. It is also worth noting that data used was following FAIR data principles for all
implementation considerations [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6 ref7">6, 7</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>5. Research Data Flow</title>
      <p>Using a single application via the Integrated Research Application System (IRAS)15 and Health
Research Authority (HRA)16 permissions were obtained at the start of the 12-month phase 1
project and were accelerated by applying before the project start date. An application was
submitted to Cegedim THIN, a world-leading high-quality longitudinal, anonymized, and
representative real-world primary care patient data source. Following successful approvals research
data applications are processed by THIN within approximately 3 weeks.1700 anonymized full
patient records from those with Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Venous leg ulcers over a continuous
2-year period aged 19-80 were obtained using READ codes17 and included the following records.</p>
      <sec id="sec-6-1">
        <title>5.1. Patients Records</title>
        <p>Exclusions were:
• Children and young people under 18
• People over the age of 80
• Patients with cancer or on chemotherapy
• Immuno-suppressed patients
14Cegedim THIN: The Health Improvement Network. https://www.cegedim-health-data.com/cegedim-health-data/
thin-the-health-improvement-network.(lastaccessed:12/03/2022)
15Integrated Research Application Systems. https://www.myresearchproject.org.uk/.(lastaccessed:05/03/2022)
16NHS, Health Research Authority. https://www.hra.nhs.uk/.(lastaccessed:14/03/2022)
17READCodes.https://digital.nhs.uk/services/terminology-and-classifications/read-codes(lastaccessed:05/03/2022)
• People with a record of self-harm
• Patients with Rheumatoid Disease
Bias was eliminated in the following ways:
• trimming the data (remove outliers / small number results)
• removing data with the absence of missing key variables (omitted variable bias)
• time interval bias – data taken over two years to reduce bias in results
• key sample size calculation from the data taken to ensure equal numbers of Sex
• 95% confidence intervals to make sure sample groups taken from the data e.g., race are
representative of the population.
• tests for degrees of association between variables – leg wound and wound healing
• computation of descriptive statistics, reporting on inferential statistics, consider efect
sizes, correlations, and diferences
• calculation of sample size (data from previous studies unavailable to determine efect size)
so efect size
• calculated on the minimum efect size considered important (sample size to attain 80%
power) for correlation analysis
Other points to note were that:
• Relationship analysis between variables - analysis that forms a valid and reliable measure
of wound healing
• Relationships can be formed between the dependent variable (the leg wound) and
individual data items as predictors of wound healing.</p>
        <p>Data on a further 200 anonymized patients from the NHS Community was also obtained
but was not combined with the above data as the THIN dataset had been subjected to robust
bias checks to ensure that it was balanced (Figure 2). The sampling strategy was random (all
wounds) and good representation of the population – (cases selected at random) Sample size
calculation was all wounds defined consistently and as a valid and reliable measure of wound
healing.</p>
        <p>Semantic web technologies were not used in the feasibility study as we did not link data from
diferent collections and in the 12-month timescale this was not possible. In the next phase, we
will explore the possibility of using linked data within the NHS rules where an organization
such as NHS Digital carries out the linkage by supplying pseudonymized linked data. In this
case, the data is linked across national data sets using a pseudonymized key known only to
NHS digital. Sensitive fields which could be used to identify individuals are also removed.</p>
        <p>The figure 3 shows how data is accessed from national, local, and specific health data
collections (of which there are several thousand routinely collected in the UK). Data is structured and
coded clinically, for GP data this was READ Coded 18(as used in the feasibility study) but most
data from GP, hospital and community systems are now using a globally accepted nomenclature,
SNOMED Clinical Terms18. SNOMED International is a not-for-profit organization that owns,
18SNOMED Clinical Terms. https://www.snomed.org/. (last accessed:22/04/2022)
administers, and develops SNOMED Clinical Terms, the world’s most comprehensive clinical
terminology. This is far richer and is standardized across countries that use the SNOMED
licenses. Once accessed then the data is securely stored and is only accessed by NHS approved
and trained analysts based in the UK. The analysts prepare data queries using SQL and using
python construct visualizations, carry out statistical analysis, and can identify patterns in the
data supporting the predictive components of the analysis. This process was completed in the
feasibility study for a narrow set of parameters around diabetic foot ulcers. (Modules 1-3 in
the figure 3) .In the next phase (Modules 4-6), many more parameters around wound healing
and venous ulcers will be used to validate the early results. The algorithms prepared in phase 1
will be run on more national data sets as well as locally collected data through the clinical trial.
Working with the NHS pilot sites, patient representatives, and application developers we will
build new models and create an application with user-designed interfaces before integrating
with existing NHS systems.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>6. Early Results</title>
      <p>Detecting a raft of modifiable predictive factors such as Vitamin B12 levels and the impact
of BMI on healing, time to amputation was analyzed isolating the key measures enabling
the prediction of time from developing diabetes to developing a foot ulcer. The ability to
predict an amputation could be deduced by the automated analysis of the following factors: a)
Hb_A1C_Diabetic_Control, b) Blood Glucose, c) HDL/LDL Ratio, d) Triglycerides, e) BMI.</p>
      <p>The dressings used and their size over time were analyzed finding the most used dressing
and the least used and the impact that they had on healing over time using size as a proxy for
healing.</p>
      <p>Clinical algorithms were developed based on the national wound guidelines produced by the
NWCSP for some parts of the patient pathway e.g., initial assessment including red flags (as
shown in Figure 3). Based on new national recommendations and updated regularly using local
formularies (clinical teams prepare these guidelines for local use) these will be tested in a secure
environment with the aim of monitoring and measuring adherence to these national standards
for wound care. Using artificial intelligence to identify people likely to develop chronic leg
wounds and to manage their preventative care will (in those that already have leg wounds, such
as diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs)), ensure that evidence of efective treatment is turned into simple
steps that are available quickly to front-line staf.</p>
      <p>The example below is a step-by-step guide for a basic clinical assessment by a front-line
practitioner (usually a community nurse) and will appear in the app as a series of questions
with yes/ no answers. Currently, At the moment such assessments are carried out on paper
questionnaires and then entered into computer systems manually by the nurse at the end of
every day.</p>
      <p>This is cumbersome, time-consuming, and creates much scope for error and lack of continuity
as several diferent nurses are often involved in each patient’s care. The app will automatically
indicate “red flags” which are critical indicators needing urgent attention and immediate onward
referral to expert clinics. In the UK there is a shortage of experienced, qualified tissue viability
nurses with these assessments being carried out by relatively inexperienced staf meaning that
currently, these red flags may not be immediately detected contributing to poor wound healing.</p>
      <p>A cost-benefit analysis was carried out by an independent evaluator who identified a societal
gain of £35 million mainly from avoided death and amputations. Monetized benefits of Woubot®
over a 10-year period for a cohort of 100 patients would be:</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>7. Recommendations</title>
      <p>Further automation of processes, combining existing data collected by the National Minimum
Wound Assessment Data Set, THIN data sets, and NHS digital HES, CSDS, and other local data
is needed to develop a complete commercial product.</p>
      <p>The research aims of phase 2 are to obtain clinical validation and measure patient outcomes
using Woubot®. The methodological considerations below enable Woubot® to overcome bias
in settings (experimental vs. real world), population (representative, size, and follow-up data),
and data (collection methodology and quality).</p>
      <p>1. What factors predict those at risk of developing hard-to-heal wounds? (building on the
prototype results above) creating evidence of the factors that predict hard to heal wounds
2. Can Woubot® generate personalised recommendations (based on National Guidelines)
and predict outcomes for patients with hard-to-heal wounds? The aim is to measure the
performance of Woubot®. Predicted probabilities will be compared to real probabilities
in novel datasets to overcome multiple biases.
3. Are Woubot®-generated personalised recommendations more efective than standard care
for patients with hard-to-heal wounds? A randomised controlled trial aims to establish
whether the implementation of Woubot® in clinical practice reduces the healing duration
of reference ulcers in patients with hard-to-heal wounds. Secondary outcomes will be
evaluated, including a range of patient-related outcomes and cost benefits.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>8. Conclusion</title>
      <p>Wounds, especially chronic wounds place a significant burden on both the patient, as well
as the health care system. Chronic wounds have been identified to be diferent from acute
wounds, with diferent management required for the optimal outcome. Artificial Intelligence
based Woubot® technology is being developed with the purpose of analyzing diferent stages
of wounds, and using existing, available patient data, to predict the best treatment options that
a clinician can use to better manage long term wounds that may result from venous leg ulcers
and diabetic foot ulcers, to name a few causes of chronic wounds. Patients and clinicians both
will benefit immensely from software that can accurately predict treatment pathways that will
reduce the time and cost of healing involved for a long-term wound. Cost-benefit analysis has
shown a societal gain of £35 million over a course of 10 years. Phase 2 of the project will involve
obtaining clinical validation and measuring patient outcomes using Woubot® technology.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Guest</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Fuller,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Vowden</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Cohort study evaluating the burden of wounds to the uk's national health service in 2017/2018: update from</article-title>
          <year>2012</year>
          /
          <year>2013</year>
          . bmj open.
          <year>2020</year>
          ;
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <issue>12</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>e045253</fpage>
          , ????
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Gray</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Rhodes</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Atkinson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Rothwell</surname>
          </string-name>
          , P. Wilson,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Dumville</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Cullum</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Opportunities for better value wound care: a multiservice, cross-sectional survey of complex wounds and their care in a uk community population</article-title>
          ,
          <source>BMJ open 8</source>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
          <article-title>e019440</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>RightCare</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Nhs rightcare scenario: The variation between sub-optimal and optimal pathways, Betty's story: Leg ulcer wound care NHS England (</article-title>
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Schaper</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>J. Van Netten</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Apelqvist</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Lipsky</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Bakker</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. W. G.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF), Prevention and management of foot problems in diabetes: a summary guidance for daily practice 2015, based on the iwgdf guidance documents</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews 32</source>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
          <fpage>7</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>15</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Armstrong</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Wrobel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Robbins</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Guest editorial: are diabetes-related wounds and amputations worse than cancer</article-title>
          ?,
          <year>2007</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Hasnain</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Rebholz-Schuhmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Assessing fair data principles against the 5-star open data principles, in: The Semantic Web: ESWC 2018 Satellite Events: ESWC 2018 Satellite Events</article-title>
          , Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 3-7,
          <year>2018</year>
          ,
          <source>Revised Selected Papers 15</source>
          , Springer,
          <year>2018</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>469</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>477</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Jacobsen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , R. de Miranda Azevedo,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Juty</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Batista</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Coles</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Cornet</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Courtot</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Crosas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Dumontier</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C. T.</given-names>
            <surname>Evelo</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <source>Fair principles: interpretations and implementation considerations</source>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>