<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>An Ensemble Approach Towards Correlating Articles and their Corresponding Images</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Sudhanva Rajesh</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ashwath Krishnan</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Bhaskarjyoti Das</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>MediaEval'22: Multimedia Evaluation Workshop</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>PES University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Bengaluru</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IN">India</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper presents a novel approach for the ranking of images for news articles as part of the the “NewsImages: Relating news articles and images” task, in order to better understand the relationship between the textual and visual content of news articles. The proposed approach combines the entity relationship and the contextual similarity between text and image by summarising both modalities into text annotations. The text annotations are generated from the news articles using Named Entity Recognition and Part of Speech tagging. Image annotations comprise of objects and labels generated from the image using the Google Vision API. The text and image annotations were further expanded by generating synsets and enriched using the wikipedia API. The analysis of the results has been carried out on the training dataset provided, and the five diferent results generated using five configurations of the proposed approach are compared.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Our proposed approach aims at covering these semantic gaps, for retrieving the corresponding
images for each of the text articles.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Related Work</title>
      <p>
        Chee Wee Leong and Rada Mihalcea[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ] presented a methodology for quantifying cross-modal
semantic links between random pairings of words and visuals. The eficiency of a corpus-based
technique for automatically determining semantic relatedness between words and images was
investigated, and empirical assessments were carried out by comparing its correlation with
human annotators. The semantic relatedness of words and images was assessed by developing
a shared semantic vector space using visual code words and textual words.
      </p>
      <p>
        Eric Müller-Budack et al.[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] provided a multimodal method for quantifying entity coherence
between picture and text in real-world news. Named entity linking was used in their suggested
approach to extract people, places, and events from news texts. Using cutting-edge computer
vision techniques, the authors used numerous metrics to calculate the cross-modal similarity of
things in text and pictures.
      </p>
      <p>
        To recommend photos for news items, Pontus Svensson[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] presented a retrieval technique
based on canonical correlation. The efects of several dense text representations created by
Word2vec and Doc2vec, as well as picture representations produced by pre-trained convolutional
neural networks were investigated. Word2Vec outperformed Doc2Vec in the task, indicating
that the meaning of article texts was not as significant as the individual words that comprised
them.
      </p>
      <p>
        Nelleke Oostdijk et al.[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] in their analysis of 1000 news articles with images proved the
inadequacy of simplistic correlation between modalities i.e. apart from visually describing text,
image can describe the entity inside the text, can describe the discordance between past, present
or present and future.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Approach</title>
      <p>With respect to the images, the Google image annotator is used to generate captions for an
image. Post this, the Wikipedia API is employed to improve the semantics of these captions
and to expand the context of the image. Named entity recognition is first performed on the
article to extract entities such as places, objects etc. Once this has been done, we proceed to
generate WordNet synsets, hyponyms and hypernyms for each of the extracted entities. The
synset of a word is a group of data elements that are considered semantically equivalent for
the purposes of information retrieval. A hyponym is a word of more specific meaning than a
general or superordinate term applicable to it and a hypernym is a word with a broad meaning
constituting a category into which words with more specific meanings fall. The Wikipedia API
is then used to generate annotations for the synsets to improve the semantics of the article. To
rank the images for a given article, the following two approaches are followed:
1. WordNet distance (D1): The Wu-Palmer Similarity is used to calculate the WordNet
distance. The WuP similarity returns a score denoting how similar two word senses are,
based on the depth of the two senses in the taxonomy and that of their Least Common
Subsumer (most specific ancestor node).
2. BERT Similarity (D2): The extracted entities for the articles and the images are
embedded into a vector of 1x768. Since a given article/image has multiple entities, the mean
of these embeddings are calculated to find the embedding for an image and an article.
Cosine similarity is then calculated between an article and every image, based on which
the images are ranked. Higher the cosine similarity, higher the rank of that image for an
article.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Results and Discussion</title>
      <p>To rank and retrieve the top ‘K’ images for every article, five diferent approaches were tested
out to find the optimum ranking system. For testing, 100 articles from the training set were
used to evaluate diferent approaches. The weighted sum was calculated to rank the images,
with varying weights for each of the below approaches. The formula to calculate the similarity
is as follows:</p>
      <p>
        =  * 1 + (1 −  ) * 2
1. WordNet Distance only: In this approach,  = 1 i.e, only the Wu-Palmer similarity was
considered for ranking the images for each of the news articles. This approach retrieved
the corresponding image for the news articles within the top-5 results for 40% of the
articles.
2. BERT Similarity only: In this approach,  = 0 i.e, only the Cosine similarity between
the embeddings generated using S-BERT for the image annotations and the text
annotations was considered for ranking the images for each of the news articles. This approach
retrieved the corresponding image for the news articles within the top-5 results for 80%
of the articles.
3. Equal weights for WordNet Distance and BERT Similarity: In this approach, the
weighted sum Wu-Palmer similarity and the cosine similarity was considered for ranking
the images. In this case,  = 0.5, which implied that the weightage towards both the
similarity measures were the same. This approach retrieved the corresponding image for
the news articles within the top-5 results for 60% of the articles.
4. Increased weightage for WordNet Distance: In this approach, the weighted sum
Wu-Palmer similarity and the cosine similarity was considered for ranking the images. In
this case,  = 0.8, which implied that the weightage towards the Wu-palmer similarity
was higher. This approach retrieved the corresponding image for the news articles within
the top-5 results 40% of the time.
5. Increased weightage for BERT Similarity: In this approach, the weighted sum
WuPalmer similarity and the cosine similarity was considered for ranking the images. In
this case,  = 0.2, which implied that the weightage towards the Cosine similarity was
higher. This approach retrieved the corresponding image for the news articles within the
top-5 results 60% of the time.
0.00422
0.00892
0.00662
0.00505
0.00940
of the article, and a direct correlation between the article and the image is not possible are
the hardest to find the linked images. In such cases the discordance between the modalities
convey the semantics[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] of the implied message and will be hardest to distinguish from pairs of
completely unrelated images and texts. It is this category that should generate maximum false
negative or false positive in any automated approach. The category of news for which it is easy
to find linked images are the ones where the articles contain objects and a suficient number
of named entities which could also be present in an image. For instance, the training dataset
consisted of an article that discussed the relations between EU and China, while the image
depicted the two flags of the same. This image was easily retrieved using all five approaches. Out
of the five diferent kinds of relationships[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ] observed between the text and image annotations,
the WordNet distance based similarity is better suited for Instance-of-Self, Member-of-Relation,
and Part-of-Relation, since the WordNet synsets, hyponyms and hypernyms correlate directly
with the above mentioned classes. BERT similarity using SBERT[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ] on the other hand is better
suited for Semantically-Related and Closely-Related text and image annotations.
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Kille</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Lommatzsch</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Özgöbek,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Elahi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>D.-T.</surname>
          </string-name>
          Dang-Nguyen,
          <source>News images in mediaeval</source>
          <year>2022</year>
          ,
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C. W.</given-names>
            <surname>Leong</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Mihalcea</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Measuring the semantic relatedness between words and images</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS</source>
          <year>2011</year>
          ),
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Müller-Budack</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Theiner</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Diering</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Idahl</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Hakimov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Ewerth</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Multimodal news analytics using measures of cross-modal entity and context consistency</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval</source>
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>111</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>125</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Svensson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Automated image suggestions for news articles: An evaluation of text and image representations in an image retrieval system</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Oostdijk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H. v.</given-names>
            <surname>Halteren</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. Basar,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Larson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The connection between the text and images of news articles: New insights for multimedia analysis (</article-title>
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Reimers</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Gurevych</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks</article-title>
          , arXiv preprint arXiv:
          <year>1908</year>
          .
          <volume>10084</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>