=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-3611/paper20 |storemode=property |title=Using parliamentary corpora to study political agenda: Attention to human rights in Lithuanian Parliament in 2020-2021 |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3611/paper20.pdf |volume=Vol-3611 |authors=Vaidas Morkevičius,Vytautas Valentinavičius,Giedrius Žvaliauskas,Monika Briedienė |dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/ivus/MorkeviciusVZB22 }} ==Using parliamentary corpora to study political agenda: Attention to human rights in Lithuanian Parliament in 2020-2021== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3611/paper20.pdf
                         Using parliamentary corpora to study political agenda:
                         Attention to human rights in Lithuanian Parliament in
                         2020-2021

                         Vaidas Morkevicius1, Vytautas Valentinavicius 1, Giedrius Zvaliauskas1
                         and Monika Briediene2
                         1 Kaunas University of Technology, K. Donelaicio street 73, LT-44249 Kaunas, Lithuania
                         2 Vytautas Magnus University, K. Donelaicio street 58, LT-44248 Kaunas, Lithuania



                                           Abstract
                                           In this paper we demonstrate how co1pora of parliamentaiy debate transcripts can be used for
                                           studying changes of political agenda. Employing dictionaiy-based computerized content
                                           analysis we investigated changing attention to the topic of human rights in the Lithuanian
                                           Parliament in the period of 2020-2021. Results of the analysis revealed that attention to the
                                           topic of human rights during the analysed period increased considerably when two focusing
                                           events - fraudulent elections in Belams in 2020 and the influx of lnigrants from Belarns to
                                           Lithuania in 2021 - took place and became the focus of public debates. The study also showed
                                           that changing public political prio1ities resulting in electoral success of pruties mobilising
                                           support for those newly emerging pri01ities had effect on increasing advocacy of human 1ights
                                           topic on the pru-Iiamenta1y agenda by representatives of the Freedom Pruty which entered the
                                           Seimas with the explicit agenda of advocating for radical changes in public policy related to
                                           human 1ights.

                                           Keywords
                                           Parliamentruy debates, human rights, political agenda, Lithuanian Parliament


                          1. Introduction                                                                              originating in the political field, these methods
                                                                                                                       suffer from either the need for lru·ge human pre­
                                                                                                                       coded resources (supervised) or interpretational
                             Pru-Iiamenta1y data have been used to study
                                                                                                                       difficulties (unsupervised): How many topics to
                         political attention in a multitude of contexts [I],
                                                                                                                       retain? How to inte1pret the substantive meaning
                         [2]. However, transc1ipts of parliamenta1y
                                                                                                                       of the topics that were retained?
                         debates have been used quite seldom for this
                                                                                                                           This paper demonstrates the usefulness of
                         purpose. More often employed alternatives ru·e
                                                                                                                       pru·liamentruy debates transciipts in analysing
                         analyses of parliamenta1y debate topics or
                                                                                                                       changes in the pru·liamenta1y political agenda.
                         agendas (minutes), legislative acts (debated or
                                                                                                                       Moreover, we approach the analysis of political
                         adopted), oral and wiitten questions to the
                                                                                                                       attention in the parliament via dictionaiy-based
                         government, and interpellations [3]. This is
                                                                                                                       coding methods of computerised content analysis
                         p1imru·ily the result of the still existing difficulty
                                                                                                                       [4]. Though it is lightly ai·gued that dictiona1y­
                         of analysing lru·ge amounts of textual data.
                                                                                                                       based coding methods ai·e high on pre-analysis
                         Though machine learning methods and topic
                                                                                                                       costs compai·ed to topic modelling approaches [5],
                         modelling approaches have been shown to be
                                                                                                                       they have two distinctive merits. First, they allow
                         useful in analysing lru·ge textual datasets
                                                                                                                       1igorous analysis when one or several topics ai·e

                         IVUS 2022: 27th International Conference on Information Technology, May 12, 2022, Kaunas,
                         Lithuania
                         EMAlL: vaidas.morkevicius@ktu.lt (V. Morkevicius); vytautas.valentinavicius@ktu.lt (V.
                         Valentinavicius); giedrius.zvaliauskas@ktu.lt (G. Zvaliauskas); monik:a.briediene@vdu.lt (M.
                         Briediene)
                         ORCID: 0000-0002-2174-0396 0/. Morkevicius); 0000-0003-2110-3917 0/. Valentinavicius);
                         0000-0001-8970-0756 (G. Zvaliauskas); 0000-0001-6165-1702 (M. Briediene)
                         ta  g>_.J
                                       @ 2022 Copyright for this paper by its aulhon. Use permitted under Cre..alh:e
                                       Common, Li,..,. Attnootion 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

                         [Ji�
                          =., =:-.:: CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)


CEUR
                  ceur-ws.org
Workshop      ISSN 1613-0073
Proceedings
i n v esti g at e d a n d t h eir v o c a b ul ari es c a n b e             p arli a m e nt a r y       a ge n da        will      be      aff e ct e d
c o m p ar ati v el y e asil y c o nstr u ct e d (t h at is, t h e          a c c or di n gl y.
v o c a b ul ari es of s p e a ki n g a b o ut t h es e t o pi cs ar e           O n t h e ot h er h a n d, r es e ar c h ers als o c o nt e n d
q uit e disti n cti v e i n t er ms of t h e c o n c e pts a n d            t h at c h a n g es i n p oliti c al l e a d ers hi p ( d uri n g
w or ds us e d). S e c o n d, t h e y all o w c a pt uri n g m or e         el e cti o ns or d u e t o c h a n g es i n g o v er n m e nt
e asil y w h at l e gisl at ors d o n ot s a y [ 6] a n d, i n t ur n,      c o m p ositi o n) m a y h a v e a si g nifi c a nt sti m ul us f or
i n di c at e w hi c h t o pi cs ar e e x cl u d e d fr o m t h e           a g e n d a c h a n g e. C ar mi n es a n d Sti ms o n [ 9]
p oliti c al a g e n d a. I n c o ntr ast, u ns u p er vis e d t o pi c     i ntr o d u c e d t h e c o n c e pt of “iss u e c o m p etiti o n ” t h at
m o d elli n g c a n o nl y c a pt ur e t o pi cs t h at ar e b ei n g      r efl e cts t h e i d e a t h at p arti es c o m p et e o n w hi c h
t al k e d a b o ut i n t h e d e b at es ( at l e ast f or s o m e         iss u es s h o ul d d o mi n at e t h e p art y p oliti c al a g e n d a.
p eri o ds).                                                                As W al k er a n d W at er m a n [ 1 0] ass ert, el e cti o ns
     I n t er ms of s u bst a nti v e g o als, w e st u d y                 aff e ct p e o pl e’s attit u d es t o w ar ds s o ci al iss u es
dis c ursi v e r ef er e n c es t o t h e t o pi c of “ H u m a n           si n c e p oliti c al c a m p ai g ns fr a m e s o ci al iss u es or
ri g hts ” i n t h e Lit h u a ni a n P arli a m e nt (t h e S ei m as)     p ut m or e e m p h asis o n s o m e iss u es r at h er t h a n
i n t h e p eri o d 2 0 2 0-2 0 2 1. T h e c h oi c e of t h e st u d y     ot h ers. P art y p oliti c al a g e n d a is m ost i m p ort a nt
t o pi c w as pri m aril y b as e d o n t h e r el ati v e e asi n ess      d uri n g t h e el e cti o n ti m e, as p arti es t h at d o mi n at e
of c o nstr u cti n g a di cti o n ar y of a p p e als t o “ H u m a n      t his a g e n d a ar e b o u n d t o wi n el e cti o ns. I n
ri g hts ” i n p arli a m e nt ar y d e b at es. T h e p oliti c al         Lit h u a ni a, t h e c a m p ai g n of t h e p arli a m e nt ar y
dis c o urs e o n h u m a n ri g hts h as a disti n cti v e                 el e cti o ns of 2 0 2 0 c o ul d b e disti n g uis h e d b y t h e
v o c a b ul ar y as s p e cifi c ati o ns a n d d efi niti o ns of         e m er g e n c e of t h e Fr e e d o m P art y, w hi c h pr o d u c e d
diff er e nt h u m a n ri g hts ar e i n cl u d e d i nt o v ari o us       c o m pr e h e nsi v e h u m a n ri g hts dis c o urs e a p p e ali n g
n ati o n al ( c o nstit uti o n al t e xts) a n d i nt er n ati o n al     t o L G B T + ri g hts, a d v o c ati n g f or t h e l e g ali z ati o n
d o c u m e nts (i nt er n ati o n al d o c u m e nts).                     of s a m e -s e x p art n ers hi ps a n d li b er al r e g ul ati o n of
     H o w e v er, t h e c h oi c e of t h e t o pi c w as als o            t h e s p elli n g of n o n-Lit h u a ni a n n a m es o n p ass p orts
b as e d o n t h e gr o u n ds of us ef ul n ess f or t h e a n al ysis     a n d si mil ar. Si n c e t h e Fr e e d o m P art y h as als o
of p oliti c al a g e n d a c h a n g es. Diff er e nt t h e ori es tr y    b e c o m e a m e m b er of t h e g o v er n m e nt al c o aliti o n,
t o e x pl ai n w h y s p e cifi c t o pi cs a p p e ar o n a n d           w e e x p e ct t h at r e pr es e nt ati v es of t his p art y will
dis a p p e ar fr o m t h e p oliti c a l a g e n d a. T his p a p er       e n g a g e i n h u m a n ri g hts r el at e d dis c o urs e i n t h e
d e m o nstr at es h o w f o c usi n g e v e nts a n d c h a n g es i n     S ei m as fl o or pr o c e e di n gs m or e fr e q u e ntl y t h a n
p u bli c p oliti c al pri oriti es aff e ct t h e p arli a m e nt ar y     r e pr es e nt ati v es of ot h er p arti es.
a g e n d a. S o m e s c h ol ars ar g u e t h at f o c usi n g e v e nts        T o s u m u p, t h e p a p er f o c us es o n h o w t h e 2 0 2 0
– or dis ast ers, cris es a n d s u d d e n, s h o c ki n g e v e nts       S ei m as el e cti o ns (i n p arti c ul ar, el e ct or al s u c c ess
gr a b bi n g t h e att e nti o n of p oliti c a l elit es a n d            of t h e Fr e e d o m P art y) a n d t w o f o c usi n g e v e nts
s o ci eti es – c a n b e criti c al i n bri n gi n g s p e cifi c          ( n a m el y, fr a u d ul e nt el e cti o ns i n B el ar us a n d th e
iss u es t o t h e f or e of t h e p oliti c al a g e n d a or m a ki n g   crisis of mi gr ati o n i nfl u x fr o m B el ar us),
t h e m s ali e nt. Bir kl a n d [ 7] cl ai ms t h at f o c usi n g         i nfl u e n c e d t h e p oliti c al att e nti o n of t h e Lit h u a ni a n
e v e nts “ c a n r e v e al c urr e nt a n d p ot e nti al f ut ur e       p arli a m e nt t o t h e t o pi c of h u m a n ri g hts.
h ar ms, m o bilis e p e o pl e a n d gr o u ps t o a d dr ess t h e
p oli c y f ail ur es ”. H o w e v er, ot h er s c h ol ars ar g u e        2. R el at e d w or k
t h at n ot all f o c ussi n g e v e nts l e a d t o a g e n d a
c h a n g e. D e L e o et al. [ 8]                   m ai nt ai n t h at
“ e ntr e pr e n e urs s e e k t o fl o o d t h e p oli c y d e b at e           H u m a n ri g hts iss u es w er e s cr uti nis e d gl o b all y
wit h t h eir pr ef err e d c o nstr u cti o n of t h e pr o bl e m         b y a d o pti n g v ari o us p ers p e cti v es, i n cl u d i n g
a n d its s ol uti o ns t o d e n y a g e n d a s p a c e t o ot h er       s e c uritis ati o n a n d dis c o urs e t h e ori es. S c h ol ars
                                                                            e m pl o y e d s e c uritis ati o n t h e or y t o e x a mi n e h o w
a ct ors ”. N ot wit hst a n di n g t h e or eti c al ar g u m e nts
wit h r e g ar d t o i nfl u e n c e of f o c usi n g e v e nts o n         s o m e s o ci al iss u es ar e s e c uritis e d t o bri n g
p oliti c al a g e n d a c h a n g es, i n t h e a n al ys e d p eri o d    e xtr a or di n ar y m e as ur es t o d e al wit h a n ass u m e d
t w o f o c usi n g e v e nts – fr a u d ul e nt el e cti o ns i n          t hr e at. S e c uritis ati o n of C O VI D-1 9, HI V/ AI D S,
B el ar us i n 2 0 2 0 a n d t h e i nfl u x of mi gr a nts fr o m          Zi k a mi gr ati o n, a n d o t h er s o ci al or h e alt h iss u es
B el ar us t o Lit h u a ni a i n 2 0 2 1 – t o o k pl a c e a n d          w er e t h or o u g hl y st u di e d, f o c usi n g o n h o w
w er e m assi v el y dis c uss e d i n t h e p u bli c s p h er e           s e c uritis ati o n of a n i m pli e d t hr e at e m p o w ers
d uri n g t h e a n al ys e d p eri o d. T h es e t w o e v e nts m a y     p arli a m e nts a n d g o v er n m e nts t o e x pl oit
b e cl os el y r el at e d t o t h e dis c ussi o n of v ari o us           e xtr a or di n ar y m e as ur es oft e n li miti n g i n di vi d u al
as p e cts of h u m a n ri g hts, t h er ef or e, w e e x p e ct t h at     fr e e d o ms ([ 1 1], [ 1 2], [ 1 3]). Ot h ers l o o k e d at t h e
                                                                            l a ng u a g e us e d t o pr o d u c e a n arr ati v e j ustif yi n g
p oliti c al m e as ur es t a k e n or b ei n g a v oi d e d. M ol n ar       r el at e d t o h u m a n ri g hts – t h e Fr e e d o m P art y –
et al. [ 1 4] ass ert t h at p arli a m e nt m e m b ers us e                 e m er g e d o n t h e p oliti c al s c e n e a n d w as s u c c essf ul
m et a p h ors of w ar a n d f e ar t o j ustif y d e cisi o ns               i n wi n ni n g 1 1 s e ats ( al m ost 1 0 %) i n t h e n e wl y
t a k e n at p arli a m e nts t h at li mit h u m a n ri g hts a n d          el e ct e d p arli a m e nt, c o ns e q u e ntl y, e nt eri n g t h e
u n d er mi n e d e m o cr a c i es. F urt h er m or e, t h e r ol e of       g o v er n m e nt al c o aliti o n. T h er ef or e, it is i m p ort a nt
p arli a m e nt m e m b ers i n s h a pi n g h u m a n ri g hts or            t o i n v esti g at e if t h e pr es e n c e of t h e Fr e e d o m P art y
c o nt est ati o n of h u m a n ri g hts iss u es is a n ot h er              i n t h e G o v er n m e nt als o pr o d u c e d c h a n g es i n t h e
s p e ctr u m of st u di es f o c usi n g o n p arli a m e nt ar y            c o nt e nt of t h e p arli a m e nt ar y d e b at es, t h at is,
d e b at es as a pl atf or m f or a g e n d a -s etti n g a n d               br o u g ht pr e vi o usl y m ar gi n al t o pi c of h u m a n
p oli c y m a ki n g [ 1 5]. V ol u mi n o us st u di es f o c u s o n        ri g hts t o t h e f or e of p oliti c al dis c ussi o ns of t h e
t h e p arli a m e nt as a n a v e n u e t o c o ntri b ut e t o t h e        S ei m as.
h u m a n ri g hts a g e n d a, as a n a ct or t o pr o m ot e                      Fi n all y, t h o u g h p oliti c al d e b at es i n t h e
h u m a n ri g hts a n d fr a m e t h e h u m a n ri g hts a g e n d a        p arli a m e nt tr a diti o n all y w er e c o nsi d er e d b y m a n y
or o v ers e e t h e e x e c uti v e a ut h oriti es ([ 1 6], [ 1 7]).        l e gisl ati v e s c h ol ars t o b e “ c h e a p t al k ” [ 2 0], m or e
     R ef er e n c es t o h u m a n ri g hts i n t h e Lit h u a ni a n       r e c e nt st u di es e m pl o y e d s p ee c h es of t h e
p arli a m e nt ar y d e b at es w er e alr e a d y st u di e d i n t h e     p arli a m e nt ar y d e b at es i n a n al ysi n g pr o mi n e nt
c o nt e xt of C O VI D -1 9 p a n d e mi c a n d it w as f o u n d           t o pi cs a n d disti n ct dis c ursi v e p att er ns of
t h at t h e P arli a m e nt el e ct e d i n 2 0 2 0 “ d e v ot e d m u c h   l e gisl ati v e d e b at es ([ 2 1], [ 2 2], [ 2 3]), as w ell as t o
m or e ti m e t o dis c ussi o ns c o n c er ni n g h u m a n                 i n v esti g at e e v ol uti o n of p oliti c al a g e n d a t o pi cs
ri g hts ” [ 1 8]. H o w e v er, t his st u d y o nl y c o v er e d t h e     a n d e x pl ai n c h a n g es of p oliti c al att e nti o n [ 5].
p eri o d of t h e y e ar 2 0 2 0, a n d r es ults c o ul d o nl y            T h us , a st u d y of p arli a m e nt ar y d e b at es tr a ns cri pts
s h o w t h at g e n er al a p p e als t o h u m a n ri g hts ( b y t h e     is a n a p pr o pri at e s o ur c e f or a n al ysi n g c h a n g es of
w h ol e p arli a m e nt) i n cr e as e d i n A u g ust 2 0 2 0,              p oliti c al a g e n d a a n d c h a n gi n g p att er ns of
w hi c h c oi n ci d e d wit h t h e f o c usi n g e v e nts r el at e d      att e nti o n t o t h e t o pi c of h u m a n ri g hts i n t h e
t o fr a u d ul e nt el e cti o ns i n B el ar us i n 2 0 2 0. I n t his      Lit h u a ni a n        p arli a m e nt.        F urt h er,       si n c e
st u d y w e e xt e n d t h e p eri o d f or a n a d diti o n al y e ar       p arli a m e nt ar y d e b at es pr o d u c e a l ot of t e xt u al
(t h us, c o v eri n g a n ot h er f o c usi n g e v e nt r el at e d t o     d at a, w e e m pl o y c o m p ut eri z e d a n al ysis. C urr e nt
t h e crisis of mi gr ati o n i nfl u x fr o m B el ar us i n                 tr e n d of p oliti c al st u di es, w h er e t e xts ar e us e d as
2 0 2 1) a n d disti n g uis h b et w e e n dis c o urs es of                 d at a, is t o e m pl o y u ns u p er vis e d t o pi c m o d elli n g
diff er e nt p arli a m e nt ar y p art y gr o u ps (f a cti o ns).           ([ 5], [ 2 4], [ 2 5], [ 2 6]). H o w e v er, t his m et h o d
T h e l att er d esi g n i m pr o v e m e nt all o ws us t o st u d y         s uff ers fr o m pr o bl e ms r el at e d t o c h o osi n g t h e
c h a n g es i n p arli a m e nt ar y dis c o urs e r el at e d t o           n u m b er of t o pi cs t o r et ai n a n d t h eir i nt er pr et ati o n.
iss u e c o m p etiti o n a n d c h a n gi n g p art y p oliti c al           M or e o v er, it o nl y m a k es p ossi bl e t o st u d y w h at is
a g e n d a. Gr e e n -P e d ers e n [ 1 9] st u di e d p art y               b ei n g s ai d a n d n ot w hi c h t o pi cs ar e e x cl u d e d fr o m
m a nif est os of W est er n E ur o p e a n p arti es i n t h e               t h e dis c ussi o n, w hi c h is es p e ci all y i m p ort a nt i n
s e c o n d p art of t h e X X c e nt ur y a n d f o u n d t h at             st u di es of p oliti c al a g e n d a c h a n g es [ 3]. T h er ef or e,
c h a n g es i n s o ci et al v al u es a n d pri oriti es h a d              w e e m pl o y a m or e tr a diti o n al di cti o n ar y -b as e d
i m p ort a nt c o ns e q u e n c es f or p art y c o m p etiti o n as        c o m p ut eri z e d a p pr o a c h t o c o nt e nt a n al ysis, as it
t h e c o nt e nt of t h e a g e n d a of p art y c o m p etiti o n           all o ws t o st u d y t o pi cs t h at c a n b e u n e q ui v o c all y
c h a n g e d. I n g e n er al, iss u e c o m p etiti o n a n d p art y       d efi n e d a n d h a v e e asil y i d e ntifi a bl e v o c a b ul ari es
p oliti c al a g e n d as w er e m ostl y st u di e d i n t h e               [ 4]. T h e t o pi c of “ H u m a n ri g hts ” m a y b e
c o nt e xt of el e cti o ns e m pl o yi n g a n al ysis of t e xt u al       c o nsi d er e d as h a vi n g s u c h q u aliti es [ 2 7].
d at a r etri e v e d fr o m p art y d o c u m e nts a n d m ass
m e di a. A n al ysis of p arli a m e nt ar y d e b at es w as                3. D at a a n d m et h o ds
r ar el y us e d f or t h e p ur p os e of st u d yi n g c h a n gi n g
str u ct ur e of p art y iss u e c o m p etiti o n. T his st u d y               3. 1.        C or p us
c o ntri b ut es t o t h e u n d erst a n di n g of c h a n gi n g p art y
p oliti c al a g e n d a as i m p ort a nt s o ci et al c h a n g es                As o ur d at a s o ur c e, w e us e d tr a ns cri pts of t h e
( c h a n gi n g v al u e pri oriti es) bri n g i nt o t h e p o w er         S ei m as pl e n ar y d e b at es fr o m 1 J a n u ar y 2 0 2 0 t o 3 1
p oliti c al p arti es w hi c h a d v o c at e s u p p ort f or iss u es      D e c e m b er 2 0 2 1. T his p eri o d is s o m e w h at e q u all y
t h at pr e vi o usl y w er e at t h e m ar gi ns of t h e p oliti c al       di vi d e d i nt o t w o s u b p eri o ds r e pr es e nti n g t h e l ast
dis c ussi o n. I n t h e Lit h u a ni a n c o nt e xt, t h e 2 0 2 0         y e ar of t h e 8t h t er m o f t h e S ei m as ( 2 0 1 6-2 0 2 0)
S ei m as el e cti o ns c o ul d b e s e e n as a m a nif est ati o n         a n d t h e first y e ar of t h e 9t h t er m of t h e S ei m as
of c h a n gi n g p art y p oliti c al a g e n d a si n c e a p art y         ( 2 0 2 0-2 0 2 4). D at a w er e a ut o m ati c all y s cr a p e d
a d v o c ati n g f or r a di c al c h a n g es i n p u bli c p oli c y       fr o m t h e offi ci al d o c u m e nt s e ar c h sit e of t h e
S ei m as:                                                 htt ps:// e -   T his i nf or m ati o n is              a v ail a bl e i n t h e
s ei m as.lrs.lt/ p ort al/ d o c u m e nt S e ar c h/lt.            We    G o v er n m e nt         c o aliti o n               a gr e e m e nts.
e nt er e d t h e p eri o d ( 2 0 2 0- 0 1- 0 1 – 2 0 2 1- 1 2- 3 1)       I nf or m ati o n a b o ut t h e n u m b er of s p e e c h es
a n d t h e t y p e of d o c u m e nt ( “ St e n o gr a m a ”), a n d      p er m o nt h b y t h e f a cti o ns a n al ys e d i n t h e
t h e s e ar c h e n gi n e r etri e v e d a t ot al of 2 1 9              p a p er (t h e o v er all n u m b er of s p e e c h es p er
tr a ns cri pts i n M S W or d ( *. d o c x) f or m at.                    m o nt h a n d t h e n u m b er of s p e e c h es b y p ositi o n
     T h e r etri e v e d fil es h a d t o b e c o n v ert e d             a n d o p p ositi o n M Ps p er m o nt h) ar e pr o vi d e d i n
i nt o t e xt u al d at a fil es ( pl ai n t e xt f or m at)               T a bl e 1 b el o w.
t o b e pr o c ess e d wit h t e xt a n al yti c t o ols. It
s h o ul d b e n ot e d t h at t h e e ntir e d at a s et is i n                 3. 2.            Di cti o n ar y              f or       the
Lit h u a ni a n; t h er ef or e, it w as ess e nti al t o                               c o m p ut eriz e d                       c o nt e nt
pr es er v e t h e U T F- 8 e n c o di n g f or f urt h er
pr o c essi n g. T h e r etri e v e d d at a is a v ail a bl e o n
                                                                                         a n al ysis
t h e D at a v ers e r e p osit or y of t h e Lit h u a ni a n D at a           F or t h e p ur p os e of a n al ysi n g r ef er e n c es t o
Ar c hi v e f or S o ci al S ci e n c es a n d H u m a niti es             “ H u m a n ri g hts ” i n t h e s p e e c h es of m e m b ers of t h e
( htt ps:// h dl. h a n dl e. n et/ 2 1. 1 2 1 3 7/ W V X N 4 V).          Lit h u a ni a n P arli a m e nt ( M Ps), w e c o ns ult e d t h e
     T h e d e b at es w er e di vi d e d i nt o s p e e c h es,           Lit h u a ni a n C o nstit uti o n, ot h er n ati o n al a n d
a n d t h e s p e e c h es of t h e S p e a k er of t h e sitti n g        i nter n ati o n al l e g al d o c u m e nts r el at e d t o e ns uri n g
w er e eli mi n at e d d u e t o t h eir pr o c e d ur al                  h u m a n ri g hts (s u c h as, f or e x a m pl e, I nt er n ati o n al
n at ur e. S p e e c h es of n o n- M Ps w er e i n cl u d e d, as         C o v e n a nt o n Ci vil a n d P oliti c al Ri g hts a n d
t h e y m a y h a v e b e e n gi v e n b y mi nist ers or                  I nt er n ati o n al C o v e n a nt o n E c o n o mi c, S o ci al a n d
s o m e ot h er i m p ort a nt p oliti c al a ct ors              who      C ult ur al Ri g hts). T h e s e ar c h t er ms i n cl u d e d i n t h e
ma y         h a v e si g nifi c a ntl y i nfl u e n c e d t h e           di cti o n ar y ar e pr o vi d e d i n T a bl e 2 b el o w.
S ei m as' p oliti c al a g e n d a. S p e e c h es of M Ps
a n d mi nist ers w er e assi g n e d t o p ositi o ns a n d
o p p ositi o n a n d f a cti o ns. I nf or m ati o n a b o ut M Ps’             3. 3.             M et h o ds
m e m b ers hi p i n f a cti o ns is pr o vi d e d o n t h e
offi ci al w e bsit e of t h e S ei m as ( w w w.lrs.lt).                       T h e c o m p ut eris e d c o nt e nt a n al ysis w as
M e m b ers hi p of mi nist ers i n f a cti o ns w as                      p erf or m e d wit h t h e q u a nt e d a ( v ersi o n 3. 0)
d et er mi n e d usi n g t h e i nf or m ati o n o n w hi c h              p a c k a g e [ 2 8] a v ail a bl e i n R l a n g u a g e a n d
p art y d el e g at e d mi nist ers t o t h e G o v er n m e nt.           e n vir o n m e nt f or st atisti c al c o m p ut i n g a n d
                                                                           gr a p hi cs [ 2 9]. First, w e c o nstr u ct e d q u a nt e d a
T a bl e 1                                                                 t o k e ns o bj e ct fr o m t h e c or p us r e m o vi n g
C or p us c h ar a ct eristi cs
p u n ct u ati o n m ar ks ( U ni c o d e “ P u n ct u ati o n ” [ P]                          t h o u g h t h eir r ol e i n pr o m oti n g h u m a n ri g hts a n d
cl ass), s y m b ols a n d s e p ar at ors ( U ni c o d e                                      m ai nt ai ni n g o v ersi g ht of i nt er n ati o n al o bli g ati o ns
“ S y m b ol ” [ S], “ S e p ar at or ” [ Z] a n d “ C o ntr ol ” [ C]                         h as b e c o m e as n e v er vit al. M or e o v er, t h eir r ol e i n
cl ass es) a n d r et ai ni n g n u m b ers as w ell as n ot                                   u p h ol di n g h u m a n ri g hts o bli g ati o ns a n d
s plitti n g w or ds t h at ar e c o n n e ct e d b y h y p h e n ati o n.                     pr o m oti n g h u m a n ri g hts a g e n d a is d e p e n d e nt o n
     T h e n w e pr o c e e d e d wit h t h e s e ar c h of                                    t h e e n g a g e m e nt of p arli a m e nt m e m b ers i n
di cti o n ar y t er ms usi n g t h e q u a nt e d a f u n cti o n                             p arli a m e nt ar y d e b at es, w hi c h is a pri m ar y
t o k e ns _l o o k u p. If a n y of t h e s e ar c h t er ms w er e                           pl atf or m f or di al o g u e i n d e m o cr a ci es. T h e
i d e ntifi e d i n t h e s p e e c h, t h e s p e e c h w as m ar k e d as                    a n al ysis of Lit h u a ni a n p arli a m e nt ar y d e b at es
c o nt ai ni n g a r ef er e n c e t o t h e “ H u m a n ri g hts ”                            c or p us r e v e al e d cl e ar fl u ct u ati o ns i n att e nti o n t o
t o pi c. T h e n w e a g gr e g at e d t h e res ults b y m o nt h                            h u m a n ri g hts iss u es, w hi c h w er e i nfl u e n c e d b y
( a n d S ei m as t er m), c o u nti n g h o w m a n y s p e e c h es                          p arli a m e nt ar y el e cti o ns a n d f o c usi n g e v e nts
p er m o nt h c o nt ai n e d r ef er e n c es t o t h e “ H u m a n                           o c c urri n g b ef or e t h e 2 0 2 0 S ei m as el e cti o ns a n d
ri g hts ” t o pi c. S p e e c h es w er e als o a g gr e g at e d b y                         aft er t h e m. T h e S ei m as d e b at es tr a ns cri pt a n al ysis
M Ps’ m e m b ers hi p i n f a cti o ns a n d b el o n gi n g t o t h e                        e x p os e d diff er e n c es i n attit u d es t o w ar ds h u m a n
p ositi o n or o p p ositi o n.                                                                ri g hts d es pit e b ot h r uli n g m aj oriti es h a d t o d e al
                                                                                               wit h t h e s a m e p u bli c h e alt h crisis – C O VI D -1 9
T a bl e 2                                                                                     p a n d e mi c – c oi n e d as a f o c usi n g e v e nt.
C or p us c h ar a ct eristi c Di cti o n ar y of s e ar c h t er ms                           N o n et h el ess, p arli a m e nts f a c e d t w o diff er e nt
r el at e d t o “ h u m a n ri g hts ” t o pi c                                                a d diti o n al f o c usi n g e v e nts t h at i m p a ct e d t h eir
                                                                                               a cti vit y, o n e of w hi c h w as fr a u d ul e nt el e cti o ns i n
                                          S e ar c h T er m s                                  B el ar us i n 2 0 2 0 b ef or e t h e 2 0 2 0 S ei m as el e cti o ns
  ž m o g a us t eis * a                                s u d ar * p art n er yst *            a n d t h e i nfl u x of irr e g ul ar mi gr a nts fr o m B el ar us
  ž m o ni ų t eis *                                    p art n er yst * i nstit ut            o n e a n d a h alf y e ars aft er t h e 2 0 2 0 Lit h u a ni a n
  * dis kri mi n a c *                                  p art n er yst * *r e gistr *
  * dis kri mi n u o *                                  pr oj e kt * k ai p p art n er yst *
                                                                                               p arli a m e nt el e cti o ns. T h e r el ati v el y l ar g est f o c us
  * dis kri mi n a v *                                  pril y gi n * p art n er yst *         o n a p p e als t o h u m a n ri g hts w as r el at e d t o e v e nts
  p at y č *                                            s a nt u o k * p art n er yst *        i n B el ar us, o n e of w hi c h dir e ctl y aff e ct e d
  n e a p y k a nt os k al b *                          ci vil * p art n er yst *
  v ai k o t eis *                                      p art n er yst * įst at y m *
                                                                                               Lit h u a ni a’s s e c urit y fr a m e w or k (s e e p eri o ds of
  v ai k ų t eis *                                      p art n er yst * įt eisi n *           0 8. 2 0 2 0 a n d 0 7. 2 0 2 1 i n Fi g. 1). H o w e v er, i n 2 0 2 1
  l y g * g ali m y b *                                 g y v e n * p art n er yst *           r uli n g m aj orit y’s a p p e als t o h u m a n ri g hts i n
  n eį g al * t eis *                                   iš br a u k * p art n er yst *         r e a cti o n t o t h e i nfl u x of mi gr a nts fr o m B el ar us
  m ot er * t eis *                                     p art n er yst * k o n c e p c *
  p až ei dži a m * gr u p *                            i nstit ut * ar p art n er yst *       a n d r e c urri n g p a n d e mi c w a v es w a s m u c h m or e
  k a n ki ni m *                                       p al ai k * p art n er yst *           pr o n o u n c e d (s e e p eri o ds of 0 1. 2 0 2 1, 0 5. 2 0 2 1,
  t eis ės virš e n y b *                               p art n er yst * l ai k ot ar p *      0 7. 2 0 2 1, a n d 1 0. 2 0 2 1 i n Fi g. 1) t h a n att e nti o n t o
  L G BT*                                               n e utr al * p art n er yst *
  pr e k * ž m o n *                                    p art n er yst * m o d el *
                                                                                               h u m a n hi g hts t o pi c b y t h e pr e vi o us g o v er n m e nt i n
  s a vir aiš k os t eis *                              r e gl a m e n * p art n er yst *      2 0 2 0. Diff er e n c es i n a p p e als t o t h e h u m a n ri g hts
  s a vir aiš k os l ais v *                            p art n er yst * n u ost at *          of r uli n g m aj oriti es st a n d o ut i n c o m p ari n g
  ž o dži o l ais v *                                   p art n er yst * p a gri n d *         p arli a m e nt ar y d e b at es c o n c er ni n g C o vi d -1 9
  t eis * g a uti i nf o *                              p art n er yst * r e gl a m e n *
  t eis * ri n kti i nf o *                             si ūl o m * p art n er yst *           p a n d e mi c       m a n a g e m e nt i n t h e Lit h u a ni a n
  ži ni as kl ai d os l ais v *                         p art n er yst * *r e g ul *           p arli a m e nt. R el ati v el y m or e a p p e als t o h u m a n
  ži ni as kl ai d os t eis *                           *r e g ul * p art n er yst *           ri g hts ar e r e c or d e d aft er t h e 2 0 2 0 p arli a m e nt ar y
  St a m b ul o k o n v e n c *                         p art n er yst * r yš *
  t eis * į s v ei k at os a ps a u *                   p art n er yst * s a nt y k *
                                                                                               el e cti o ns t h a n b ef or e t h e m. F urt h er m or e, u nli k e
  as m e n * p art n er yst *                           p art n er yst * s ą v o k *           b ef or e t h e el e cti o ns, t h e r uli n g m aj orit y w as m or e
  įt eis * p art n er yst *                             p art n er yst * s u d ar *            u nit e d i n a p p e ali n g t o h u m a n ri g hts w hil e
  p art n er yst * ar s a nt u o k *                    p art n er yst * t eisi n *
  dis k usij * a pi e p art n er yst *                  * pril y gi n * p art n er yst *
                                                                                               dis c ussi n g C O VI D -1 9 p a n d e mi c m a n a g e m e nt
  p art n er yst * f or m *                             s ą v o k * p art n er yst *           m e as ur es or r e vi e wi n g a n d a d o pti n g t h e
  f a kti n * p art n er yst *                          p art n er yst * užti kri ni m *       a p pr o a c h es t o mi gr ati o n crisis m a n a g e m e nt.
  *r e gistr * p art n er yst *                         įt eisi n * p art n er yst *           I nt er esti n gl y, s o ci al d e m o cr ats ( L S D P) w er e n ot
  p art n er yst * g y v e n *                          * g al v o * a pi e p art n er yst *
a Ast eris k i n s e ar c h t er ms r ef ers t o st e m m e d p att er ns.                     t h e m ost ar d e nt a d v o c at es of h u m a n ri g hts i n t h e
                                                                                               S ei m as, t h o u g h t his t o pi c is us u all y at t h e
                                                                                               f or efr o nt of s o ci al d e m o cr ati c i d e ol o g y p arti es
4. R es ults                                                                                   ar o u n d t h e w orl d [ 3 0].
                                                                                                     O v er all, t h es e r es ults cl e arl y i n di c at e t h at
     L y er [ 1 6]           m ai nt ai ns t h at p ar li a m e nts                            f o c usi n g e v e nts m o bili z e d all p arti es i n a d o pti n g
u nr e as o n a bl y ar e i g n or e d as h u m a n ri g hts pl a y ers,                       t h e r es ol uti o n c o n d e m ni n g fr a u dul e nt el e cti o ns i n
B el ar us [ 3 1], w hi c h a d dr ess e d h u m a n ri g hts               ( a n d still ar e) t h e m ost ar d e nt s u p p ort ers of h u m a n
vi ol ati o ns t h er ei n a n d a p p e al e d t o h u m a n ri g hts      ri g hts t o pi cs aft er t h e 2 02 0 el e cti o ns ( e x c e pt f or
o v er all i n t h e n ei g h b o uri n g c o u ntr y b y ur gi n g         p eri o ds of 0 4. 2 0 2 1, 0 5. 2 0 2 1, a n d 0 8. 2 0 2 1, s e e
s a n cti o ns f or B el ar us r e gi m e’s pl a y ers a n d                Fi g ur e 1). T h es e fi n di n gs gi v e s u p p ort f or t h e
s u p p ort ers i n 2 0 2 0 (s e e p eri o d 0 8. 2 0 2 0 i n Fi g ur e     t h e ori es of c h a n gi n g str u ct ur e of p art y iss u e
1) a n d al m ost u n a ni m o usl y s u p p orti n g m e as ur es          c o m p etiti o n t h at is pr o d u c e d b y s o ci et al c h a n g es
t o c o p e wit h mi gr ati o n crisis [ 3 2] t h at w er e i n             as r efl e ct e d i n s hifti n g p u bli c p oliti c al pri oriti es.
l ar g e p art r el at e d t o r e g ul ati n g t h e ri g hts of t h e
mi gr a nts (s e e p eri o ds of 0 7. 2 0 2 1 a n d 1 0. 2 0 2 1 i n        5. C o n cl usi o ns
Fi g. 1). T h es e r es ults gi v e s u p p ort f or t h e
ar g u m e nts of s c h ol ars c o nt e n d i n g t h at f o c usi n g
e v e nts pr o d u c e c h a n g es i n p oliti c al a g e n d as.               T h e a n al ysis of t h e S ei m as d e b at es tr a ns cri pts
      F urt h er, gr e at er f o c us o n h u m a n ri g hts b y t h e      r e v e al e d t h at f o c usi n g e v e nts ar e a cl e ar s o ur c e of
r uli n g m aj orit y a n d m or e ri g or o us a cti vit y i n             c h a n g es of p oliti c al a g e n d a. Att e nti o n t o t h e t o pi c
a p p e ali n g t o h u m a n ri g hts i n 2 0 2 1 mi g ht b e              of h u m a n ri g hts d uri n g t h e a n al ys e d p eri o d of
                                                                            2 0 2 0 -2 0 2 1 i n cr e as e d c o nsi d er a bl y w h e n t w o
e x pl ai n e d b y t h e as c e nsi o n t o p o w er of li b er al
p arti es, es p e ci all y t h e n e w li b er al p art y – t h e           f o c usi n g e v e nts – fr a u d ul e nt el e cti o ns i n B el ar us
Fr e e d o m P art y. T h e y p ositi o n t h e ms el v es as               i n 2 0 2 0 a n d t h e i nfl u x of mi gr a nts fr o m B el ar us t o
p arti es t h at pr ot e ct h u m a n ri g hts a n d pr o m ot e            Lit h u a ni a i n 2 0 2 1 – t o o k pl a c e a n d b e c a m e t h e
h u m a n ri g hts a g e n d a. M or e o v er, h u m a n ri g hts           f o c us of p u bli c d e b at es. T his w as cl e arl y r el at e d
iss u es w er e i n cl u d e d i n t h e Fr e e d o ms P art y’s            t o t h e n at ur e of t h es e e v e nts, as si z e a bl e s h ar e of
pr o gr a m m e a n d w er e a d v o c at e d i n t h e a gr e e m e nt     t h e dis c ussi o ns i n t h e P arli a m e nt w as d e v ot e d t o
of t h e r uli n g m aj orit y. Alt h o u g h s o m e h u m a n             s ol vi n g or pr o m oti n g v ari o us h u m a n ri g hts iss u es.
ri g hts iss u es di d n ot a p p e ar o n t h e g o v er n m e nt’s             T h e r es ults of t h e st u d y als o pr o vi d e s u p p ort
a g e n d a, t h e y w er e i n cl u d e d i nt o t h e r uli n g           f or t h e t h e or y of p art y iss u e c o m p etiti o n e v ol uti o n
m aj orit y’s a gr e e m e nt a n d h a v e b e e n a gr e e d t o b e      r es ulti n g fr o m s o ci et al c h a n g es a n d r efl e ct e d i n
s u p p ort e d b y t h e li b er al wi n g of t h e l ar g est r uli n g   c h a n gi n g p oli ti c al pri oriti es. P u bli c v al u e
p art y – t h e H o mel a n d U ni o n. I m p ort a ntl y, t h es e         ori e nt ati o ns c h a n g e a n d ( us u all y, n e w) p arti es
d e v el o p m e nts h a d cl e ar i m p a ct o n t h e p oliti c al        gr a b o p p ort u niti es t o m o bilis e s u p p ort f or t h es e
att e nti o n i n t h e S ei m as d e b at es. W e c a n cl e arl y         n e wl y e m er gi n g pri oriti es. R e pr es e nt ati v es of t h e
s e e t h at r e pr es e nt ati v es of t h e Fr e e d o m P art y w er e   Fr e e d o m P art y a d v o c at e d r a di c al c h a n g es i n
                                                                            p u bli c p oli c y r el at e d t o h u m a n ri g ht s d uri n g t h e
                                                                            2 0 2 0 S ei m as el e cti o ns. I m p ort a ntl y, t h e t o pi c of
Fi g ur e 1 : E x a m pl e fi g ur e A p p e als t o h u m a n ri g hts
i n Lit h u a ni a n P arli a m e nt i n 2 0 2 0-2 0 2 1
h u m a n ri g hts st a y e d m ost pr o mi n e ntl y o n t h e              M arti n, T. S a alf el d, a n d K. W. Str ø m, E ds.
a g e n d a of t his p art y i n t h e p arli a m e nt ar y d e b at es      O xf or d: O U P, 2 0 1 4, p p. 1 2 6 – 1 4 4.
e v er aft er it b e c a m e a p art of t h e r uli n g m aj orit y.              [ 7] T. Birl k a n d a n d K. L. S c h w a e bl e,
T h er ef or e, w e c a n wit n ess a tr a nsf er of c h a n g es of         “ A g e n d a s etti n g a n d t h e p oli c y pr o c ess: F o c usi n g
s o ci et al pri oriti es i nt o t h e p oliti c al ar e n a a n d p art y   e v e nts, ” i n O xf or d R es e ar c h E n c y cl o p e di a of
a g e n d a.                                                                 P oliti cs, 2 0 1 9. R etri e v e d 1 M ar c h 2 0 2 2, fr o m
     T h es e r es ults, i n t ur n, s h o w e d t h at                      htt ps:// o xf or dr e. c o m/ p oliti cs/ vi e w/ 1 0. 1 0 9 3/ a cr ef
p arli a m e nt ar y d e b at es c or p or a c a n b e a us ef ul            or e/ 9 7 8 0 1 9 0 2 2 8 6 3 7. 0 0 1. 0 0 0 1/ a cr ef or e -
r es o ur c e f or t h e a n al ysis of p oliti c al a g e n d a             9 7 8 0 1 9 0 2 2 8 6 3 7 -e -1 6 5.
c h a n g es a n d c h a n gi n g p att er ns of p oliti c al                     [ 8] R. A. D e L e o, K. T a yl or, D. A. Cr o w, a n d
att e nti o n t o at l e a st s o m e t o pi cs. Als o, t h e y g a v e      T. A. Bir kl a n d, “ D uri n g Dis ast er: R efi ni n g t h e
s u p p ort f or f urt h er us e of a tr a diti o n al di cti o n ar y -     C o n c e pt of F o c usi n g E v e nts t o B ett er E x pl ai n
b as e d c o m p ut eri z e d a p pr o a c h t o c o nt e nt a n al ysis     L o n g -D ur ati o n Cris es, ” I nt. R e v. P u bli c A d m.,
f or st u d yi n g t o pi cs t h at c a n b e u n e q ui v o c all y         v ol. 3( 1), p p. 5 – 2 8, 2 0 2 1.
d efi n e d a n d h a v e e asil y i d e ntifi a bl e v o c a b ul ari es         [ 9] E. G. C ar mi n es a n d J. A. Sti ms o n, “ O n t h e
(s u c h as t h e t o pi c of “ H u m a n ri g hts ” st u di e d i n         str u ct ur e a n d s e q u e n c e of iss u e e v ol uti o n ”, A m.
t his p a p er). H o w e v er, t his st u d y w as li mit e d t o            P olit. S ci. R e v., v ol. 8 0( 3), p p. 9 0 1 – 9 2 0, 1 9 8 6.
q u a ntit ati v e a n al ysis of g e n er al tr e n ds of “ h u m a n            [ 1 0] L. D. W a l k er a n d R. W. W at er m a n,
ri g hts ” dis c ussi o ns i n t h e S ei m as. F ut ur e w or k             “ El e cti o ns as f o c usi n g e v e nts: E x pl ai ni n g
c o ul d als o e m pl o y q u alit ati v e dis c o urs e a n al ysis         attit u d es t o w ar d t h e p oli c e a n d t h e g o v er n m e nt i n
i n or d er t o i d e ntif y c h a n g es i n t h e p arli am e nt ar y      c o m p ar ati v e p ers p e cti v e, ” L a w S o c. R e v., v ol.
a g e n d a m or e pr e cis el y a n d pr o vi d e m or e s p e cifi c       4 2( 2), p p. 3 3 7 – 3 6 6, 2 0 0 8.
e x pl a n ati o ns of t h es e c h a n g es.                                     [ 1 1] J. H eri n gt o n, “ S e c uriti z ati o n of I nf e cti o us
                                                                             Dis e as es i n Vi et n a m: T h e C as es of HI V a n d
6. A c k n o wl e d g e m e nts                                              A vi a n I nfl u e n z a, ” H e alt h P oli c y Pl a n., v ol. 2 5( 6),
                                                                             p p. 4 6 7 – 7 5, 2 0 1 0.
                                                                                  [ 1 2] C. V e n h a m a n d D. B. L. F ari as,
     T his pr oj e ct h as r e c ei v e d f u n di n g fr o m t h e
                                                                             “ S e c uriti zi n g Zi k a: T h e C as e of Br a zil, ” S e c ur.
R es e ar c h C o u n cil of Lit h u a ni a ( L M T L T),                    Di al o g u e, v ol. 5 0 ( 5), p p. 3 9 8 – 4 1 5, 2 0 1 9.
a gr e e m e nt N o. P -MI P -2 0 -3 7 3.
                                                                                  [ 1 3] K. J as k ul o ws ki, “ T h e S e c uritis at i o n of
                                                                             Mi gr ati o n: Its li mits a n d c o ns e q u e n c es, ” I nt.
7. R ef er e n c es                                                          P oliti c al S ci. R e v., v ol. 4 0( 5), p p. 7 1 0 – 7 2 0, 2 0 1 9.
                                                                                  [ 1 4] A. M ol n ár, L. T a k á cs, a n d É. J. H ar n os,
     [ 1] F. R. B a u m g art n er, C. Gr e e n -P e d ers e n,              “ S e c uriti z ati o n of t h e C O VI D -1 9 p a n d e mi c b y
a n d B. D. J o n es, E ds. C o m p ar ati v e st u di es of                 m et a p h ori c dis c o urs e d uri n g t h e st at e of
p oli c y a g e n d as. N e w Y or k: R o utl e d g e, 2 0 0 8.              e m er g e n c y i n H u n g ar y, ” I nt. J. S o ci ol. S o c.
     [ 2] C. Gr e e n -P e d ers e n a n d S. W al gr a v e, E ds.           P oli c y, v ol. 4 0( 9), p p. 1 1 6 7 – 1 1 8 2, 2 0 2 0.
A g e n d a s etti n g, p oli ci es, a n d p oliti c al s yst e ms: A             [ 1 5] P. A hr e ns, B. G a w e d a, a n d J. K a nt ol a,
c o m p ar ati v e a p pr o a c h. C hi c a g o: U ni v ersit y of           “ R efr a mi n g t h e l a n g u a g e of h u m a n ri g hts ?
C hi c a g o Pr ess, 2 0 1 4.                                                P oliti c al gr o u p c o nt est ati o ns o n w o m e n’s a n d
     [ 3] F. R. B a u m g art n er, C. Br e u ni g, a n d G.                 L G B T QI ri g hts i n E ur o p e a n P arli a m e nt d e b at es, ”
E mili a n o, E ds. C o m p ar ati v e p oli c y a g e n d as:               J. E ur. I nt e gr., i n pr ess.
T h e or y, t o ols, d at a. O xf or d: O U P, 2 0 1 9.                           [ 1 6] K. R. L y er, “ P arli a m e nts as H u m a n
     [ 4] K. Kri p p e n d orff, C o nt e nt a n al ysis. A n                Ri g hts A ct ors: T h e P ot e nti al f or I nt er n ati o n al
I ntr o d u cti o n t o its M et h o d ol o g y, 4t h e d. L o n d o n:      Pri n ci pl es o n P arli a m e nt ar y H u m a n Ri g hts
S a g e, 2 0 1 8.                                                            C o m mitt e es, ” N or d. J. H u m. Ri g hts, v ol. 3 7( 3),
     [ 5] K. M. Q ui n n, B. L. M o nr o e, M. C ol ar esi,                  p p. 1 9 5 – 2 1 5, 2 0 1 9.
M. H. Cr es pi n, a n d D. R. R a d e v, “ H o w t o a n al ys e                  [ 1 7] S. N c u b e, “ H u m a n ri g hts e nf or c e m e nt i n
p oliti c al att e nti o n wit h mi ni m al ass u m pti o ns a n d           Afri c a: E n h a n ci n g t h e P a n -Afri c a n P arli a m e nt's
c osts, ” A m. J. P olit. S ci., v ol. 5 4, p p. 2 0 9 – 2 2 8,              c a p a cit y t o pr o m ot e a n d pr ot e ct h u m a n ri g hts, ”
2 0 1 0.                                                                     Afr. H u m. Ri g hts L a w J., v ol. 2 0( 1), p p. 1 0 3 – 1 2 4,
     [ 6] J. B. Sl a pi n a n d S.-O. Pr o ks c h, “ W or ds as              2 0 2 0.
d at a: C o nt e nt a n al ysis i n l e gisl ati v e st u di es, ” i n            [ 1 8] V. V al e nti n a vi či us, M. Bri e di e n ė, V.
T h e O xf or d H a n d b o o k of L e gisl ati v e St u di es, S.           M or k e vi či us, G. Ž v ali a us k as, a n d T. Kril a vi či us,
                                                                             “ E v ol uti o n of t h e P olit i c al A g e n d a d uri n g t h e
C O VI D -1 9 P a n d e mi c: A n al ysis of t h e S ei m as                    d e cl ar es -l u k as h e n k o-n ot -l e giti m at e-l e a d er-of -
D e b at es Tr a ns cri pts, ” i n C E U R                    W or ks h o p     b el ar us.
Pr o c e e di n gs, V ol -2 9 1 5, 2 0 2 1, p p. 1 5 8 – 1 6 6.                      [ 3 2] B alti c N e ws S er vi c e, Lit h u a ni a a d o pts
     [ 1 9] C.      Gr e e n -P e d ers e n, “ T h e            Gr o wi n g     l a w r estri cti n g ri g hts of irr e g ul ar mi gr a nts, 2 0 2 1.
I m p ort a n c e of Iss u e C o m p etiti o n: T h e C h a n gi n g            A v ail a bl e       at       htt ps:// w w w.lrt.lt/ e n/ n e ws -i n-
N at ur e of P art y C o m p etiti o n i n W est er n E ur o p e, ”             e n glis h/ 1 9/ 1 4 5 0 1 8 2/lit h u a ni a -a d o pts -l a w-
P oliti c al St u d., v ol. 5 5( 3), p p. 6 0 7 – 6 2 8, 2 0 0 7.               r estri cti n g-ri g hts-of -irr e g ul ar-m i gr a nts.
     [ 2 0] D.           A ust e n -S mit h,             “I nf or m ati o n
Tr a ns missi o n i n D e b at e, ” A m. J. P olit. S ci., v ol.
3 4( 1), p p. 1 2 4 – 1 5 2, 1 9 9 0.
     [ 2 1] J. B ar a, A. W e al e, a n d A. Bi c q u el et,
“ A n al ysi n g P arli a m e nt ar y D e b at e wit h C o m p ut er
Assist a n c e, ” S wiss P oliti c al S ci. R e v., v ol. 1 3( 4),
p p. 5 7 7 – 6 0 5, 2 0 0 7.
     [ 2 2] C.             S c h o n h ar dt -B ail e y,            “ T he
C o n gr essi o n al D e b at e o n P arti al -Birt h A b orti o n:
C o nstit uti o n al Gr a vit as a n d M or al P assi o n, ” Br. J.
P oliti c al S ci., v ol. 3 8( 3), p p. 3 8 3 – 4 1 0, 2 0 0 8.
     [ 2 3] A. W e al e, A. Bi c q u el et, a n d J. B ar a,
“ D e b ati n g A b orti o n, D e li b er ati v e R e ci pr o cit y a n d
P arli a m e nt ar y A d v o c a c y, ” P oliti c al St u d., v ol.
6 0( 3), p p. 6 4 3 – 6 6 7, 2 0 1 2.
     [ 2 4] J. Gri m m er a n d B. M. St e w art, “ T e xt as
d at a: T h e pr o mis e a n d pitf alls of a ut o m ati c
c o nt e nt a n al ysis m et h o ds f or p oliti c al t e xts, ”
P oliti c al A n al ysis, v ol. 2 1( 3), p p. 2 6 7 – 2 9 7, 2 0 1 3.
     [ 2 5] D. Gr e e n e a n d J. P. Cr oss, “ E x pl ori n g t h e
P oliti c al A g e n d a of t h e E ur o p e a n P arli a m e nt
Usi n g a D y n a mi c T o pi c M o d eli n g A p pr o a c h, ”
P oliti c al A n al., v ol. 2 5( 1), p p. 7 7 – 9 4, 2 0 1 7.
     [ 2 6] E. d el G o b b o, S. F o nt a n ell a, A. S arr a, a n d
L. F o nt a n ell a, “ E m er gi n g T o pi cs i n Br e xit D e b at e
o n T witt er Ar o u n d t h e D e a dli n es: A Pr o b a bilisti c
T o pi c M o d elli n g A p pr o a c h, ” S o c. I n di c. R es.,
v ol. 1 5 6, p p. 6 6 9 – 6 8 8, 2 0 2 1.
     [ 2 7] A. St e v e ns a n d J. All e n -R o b erts o n,
“ E n cr y pti n g h u m a n ri g hts: T h e i nt ert wi ni n g of
r esist a nt v oi c es i n t h e U K st at e s ur v eill a n c e
d e b at e, ” Bi g D at a S o c., v ol. 8( 1), p p. 1 – 1 5, 2 0 2 1.
     [ 2 8] K. B e n oit, K. W at a n a b e, H. W a n g, P.
N ult y, A. O b e n g, S. M üll er, a n d A. M ats u o,
“ q u a nt e d a: A n R p a c k a g e f or t h e q u a ntit ati v e
a n al ysis of t e xt u al d at a, ” J. o p e n s o ur c e s oft w.,
v ol. 3, 7 7 4, 2 0 1 8, htt ps:// q u a nt e d a.i o.
     [ 2 9] R C or e T e a m, R: A l a n g u a g e a n d
e n vir o n m e nt f or st atisti c al c o m p uti n g.                     R
F o u n d ati o n f or St atisti c al C o m p uti n g, Vi e n n a,
2 0 2 2, htt ps:// w w w. R -pr oj e ct. or g.
     [ 3 0] T.        K ast ni n g,        B asi cs       on       S o ci al
D e m o cr a c y. Fri e dri c h E b ert Stift u n g, 2 0 1 3.
     [ 3 1] I. J a č a us k as, Lit h u a ni a n p arli a m e nt
d e cl ar es L u k as h e n k o n ot l e giti m at e l e a d er of
B el ar us. B alti c N e ws S er vi c e, 2 0 2 0. A v ail a bl e at
htt ps:// w w w.lrt.lt/ e n/ n e ws -i n-
e n glis h/ 1 9/ 1 2 1 4 3 0 4/lit h u a ni a n -p arli a m e nt -