=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-3614/abstract1
|storemode=property
|title=The Interplay of Multimodal Argumentation, AudioSonic Resonance, Secular Mysticism, and Natural Argumentation in Computational Models - extended abstract
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3614/abstract1.pdf
|volume=Vol-3614
|authors=Loris Isabettini
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/cmna/Isabettini23
}}
==The Interplay of Multimodal Argumentation, AudioSonic Resonance, Secular Mysticism, and Natural Argumentation in Computational Models - extended abstract==
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3614/abstract1.pdf
The Interplay of Multimodal Argumentation, AudioSonic
Resonance, Secular Mysticism, and Natural Argumentation in
Computational Models
Loris Isabettini
University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, ON N9B 3P4
Abstract
"Can machines truly capture the profound resonance of human argumentation?" As we delve into
this question, the landscape of natural argumentation is undergoing a transformative evolution,
integrating not just computational models and arti icial intelligence [1],[7] but also the profound
intersections of Multimodal Argumentation and Secular Mysticism. Drawing from groundbreaking
research into the transformative power of sound and its implications in mental well-being and
therapeutic applications, this evolution paints a richer tapestry of argumentation, bridging diverse
disciplines [4],[8].
Keywords
Computational Models in Argumentation, Multimodal Argumentation, Secular Mysticism,
Transformative Power of Sound, Mental Well-being and Therapy, Natural Argumentation Theory, Cognitive In luences
in Argumentation, Linguistic Nuances in Argumentation, AI and Legal Argumentation, Ethical Considerations in AI
Argumentation, Secular Mysticism in Digital Discourse, Cross-Cultural Argumentation Analysis, AudioSonic
Resonance and Therapy, Future of AI in Argumentation. 1
1. Bridging Traditional Argumentation and Computational
Methodologies: The Role of Secular Mysticism and Multimodal
Communication
The essence of this paper lies in exploring how traditional argumentation theories can
be harmonized with modern computational methodologies, mainly focusing on the profound
spiritual experiences explored in Secular Mysticism [9],[10]. We are on the cusp of a deeper
understanding of argumentation's essence, where the multimodal nature of human
communication intersects with the non-tangible yet deeply impactful elements of Secular
Mysticism. This journey through a multifaceted landscape spotlights the con luence of
paradigms, the genesis of genuine arguments, and the challenges and triumphs ahead. It echoes
the interdisciplinary insights from recent research on the transformative power of sound and its
therapeutic applications [5],[3], all while navigating the dynamic terrain of natural
argumentation, celebrating its rich past, vibrant present, and promising, harmonious future
[10],[7].
Natural arguments, as encountered in everyday discourse, differ signi icantly from the
structured, formal arguments often studied in logic and philosophy [1],[4]. These arguments are
embedded in our conversations, debates, and discussions, re lecting the complexities and
nuances of human thought and communication. In this context, Multimodal Argumentation
becomes particularly relevant. It encompasses not just the verbal or written aspects of
argumentation but also the non-verbal cues, the tonal variations, and the contextual settings
integral to human interaction [8]. This multimodal perspective is crucial in understanding the
full spectrum of argumentation, especially when it intersects with the spiritual and existential
dimensions explored in Secular Mysticism.
CMNA 23: Computational Models of Natural Argument
isabett@uwindsor.ca
0000-0002-9366-4863
© 2023 Copyright for this paper by its author.
Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)
CEUR
ceur-ws.org
Workshop ISSN 1613-0073
Proceedings
f
f
f
f
f
1.1. Generation, Mining, and Models:
1.1.1.Multimodal Argumentation in Computational Models
In a classroom setting, the principles of Kisceral Argumentation are employed, but with a
distinct emphasis on Multimodal Argumentation. This approach recognizes that arguments are
not just verbal or textual but can be conveyed through multiple modes, such as music, visuals,
and even physical expressions [5]. An AI-driven platform in this scenario simulates scenarios
that integrate opera performances with visual and textual elements, creating a rich, multimodal
learning experience. The AI system is designed to analyze vocal in lections, musical crescendos,
visual cues, and body language, synthesizing these elements to generate comprehensive
arguments and counterarguments [6]. This multimodal approach re lects the complexity of
human communication and argumentation, providing students with a more holistic
understanding of discourse [7].
1.1.2. Secular Mysticism in Digital Discourse
The exploration of Secular Mysticism in digital discourse is deepened by focusing on how
spiritual experiences, devoid of religious connotations, are communicated and understood in
the digital age [7]. AI tools equipped with natural language processing and sentiment analysis
delve into online discussions about Secular Mysticism, identifying patterns and themes and the
emotional undertones and spiritual nuances in these conversations [4],[6]. This approach
provides a unique insight into how secular spiritual experiences are articulated and perceived in
various cultural contexts, highlighting the role of language and emotion in conveying mystical
experiences [1],[3].
1.1.3. Argumentation Mining and Computational Linguistics
While maintaining its role in extracting core arguments and counterarguments from online
content, the focus shifts to how these tools can be used to understand and analyze multimodal
and mystical arguments [5],[7]. The AI models are trained to recognize logical structures and
rhetorical devices and interpret non-verbal cues and emotional tones, particularly in
discussions involving Secular Mysticism [3],[8]. This comprehensive analysis extends beyond
traditional text-based argumentation, embracing the complexity of multimodal communication
[6],[9].
1.1.4. Argumentation Mining and Computational Linguistics
In the legal domain, AI models are adapted to recognize and analyze arguments
incorporating Secular Mysticism and Multimodal Argumentation elements [7],[9]. These models
assist attorneys and judges in understanding and interpreting arguments that may involve non-
traditional forms of evidence or reasoning, such as emotional appeals or cultural references [6],
[8]. The AI's ability to process and integrate diverse forms of argumentation enhances legal
decision-making, providing a more nuanced understanding of cases that involve complex human
experiences [3],[5].
2. Philosophical and Rhetorical Dimensions in Computational
Argumentation
2.1.1. Philosophical Implications of Integrating Multimodal Argumentation
and AI
The fusion of Multimodal Argumentation with AI technologies raises profound philosophical
questions about the nature of argumentation, communication, and understanding [1],[7].
Traditionally, argumentation has been viewed through logic and rhetoric, focusing primarily on
verbal and written discourse [2],[4]. However, including non-verbal indications (such as those
found in opera) and the emotional resonance of sound challenges this view, suggesting a more
holistic understanding of argumentation that encompasses multiple modes of human
expression [3],[9]. This shift aligns with the philosophical notion that human experience and
f
f
communication are inherently multimodal and that understanding these experiences requires
synthesizing various sensory inputs and cognitive processes [5],[10].
2.1.2. Rhetorical Analysis in the Age of AI and Secular Mysticism
Rhetoric, the art of persuasion, has traditionally been centred on the use of language [2].
However, integrating Secular Mysticism and AudioSonic Resonance into computational models
introduces a new dimension to rhetorical analysis [7],[9]. Persuasion can also occur through
non-verbal means, such as music and sound, which can evoke profound emotional responses
and alter states of consciousness [3]. This expansion of rhetoric challenges traditional
boundaries and opens new avenues for exploring how persuasion occurs in various cultural and
spiritual contexts [5],[10].
2.1.3. Ethical Considerations in Computational Argumentation
Ethical considerations become increasingly important as AI systems become more adept at
understanding and generating multimodal arguments [1],[10]. The ability of AI to analyze and
in luence human emotions and beliefs through sound and visual cues raises questions about
manipulation and consent [3],[9]. Philosophically, this leads to reevaluating the ethics of
persuasion and the responsibilities of those who design and deploy such systems [2],[4].
Ensuring these technologies enhance understanding and empathy rather than exploit
vulnerabilities or biases is crucial [5],[10].
2.1.4. The Future of Argumentation in a Digitally-Connected World
Looking forward, integrating these diverse elements in computational models points to a
future where argumentation is not just a tool for debate or persuasion but a means of fostering
more profound understanding and connection across cultural and spiritual divides [4],[6]. Using
AI to analyze and generate arguments based on Secular Mysticism and AudioSonic Resonance
can bridge gaps in knowledge and bring diverse perspectives into dialogue with one another [7],
[8]. This has signi icant implications for global communication, education, and con lict
resolution, suggesting a future where technology enhances, rather than diminishes, our shared
humanity [1],[5].
3. Practical Applications and Case Studies in Computational Contexts
3.1.1. Case Study 1: Multimodal Argumentation in Educational AI Systems
Scenario: An AI-driven educational platform is designed to teach argumentation skills using
opera as a medium [9]. The venue, equipped with advanced language and image processing
capabilities, analyzes opera performances, integrating musical, textual, and visual elements to
create comprehensive argumentative scenarios [1],[3].
Application: Students interact with the AI system, which presents arguments based on an
opera's narrative, music, and visual cues [5],[7]. For instance, the AI might generate an argument
on the ethical dilemmas presented in Mozart's "Don Giovanni," using the character's vocal
expressions, lyrical content, and stage actions [2],[4]. Students are then tasked with formulating
counterarguments, encouraging them to consider multiple modes of communication in their
reasoning [6],[8].
Analysis: The effectiveness of this approach is evaluated by assessing improvements in
students' argumentation skills, their ability to interpret multimodal cues, and their engagement
with the material [10]. This case study demonstrates the potential of AI in enhancing learning
experiences by integrating diverse communicative modes.
3.1.2. Case Study 2: ChatGPT and Secular Mysticism in Online Forums
Scenario: A research project utilizes ChatGPT to analyze discussions on Secular Mysticism in
online forums. The model is trained to identify key themes, emotional tones, and argumentative
structures in these discussions [1],[5].
f
f
f
Application: ChatGPT processes large volumes of text from various online platforms, focusing
on conversations about personal spiritual experiences unrelated to any religion. The model
identi ies common patterns, such as using metaphorical language or expressing profound
personal transformations [3],[4].
Analysis: The effectiveness of ChatGPT in this context is evaluated based on its ability to
accurately capture the essence of Secular Mysticism in digital discourse and the insights it
provides into how these experiences are communicated and perceived [7],[9]. This case study
highlights the role of AI in understanding complex, emotionally charged topics in digital
communication [2],[6],[8].
3.1.3. Case Study 3: Legal Argumentation Analysis with AI
Scenario: An AI model is developed to assist in analyzing legal arguments that incorporate
elements of Secular Mysticism and Multimodal Argumentation, particularly in cases involving
cultural and emotional nuances [7],[9].
Application: The AI system is used in a mock trial setting, where it analyzes arguments
presented by attorneys that include references to cultural practices and non-verbal cues [2],[5].
The model evaluates the arguments for logical coherence, emotional appeal, and cultural
relevance [4],[8].
Analysis: The model's effectiveness is assessed based on its accuracy in interpreting complex
arguments and its utility in providing insights to legal professionals [1],[3]. This case study
explores the potential of AI in enhancing the understanding and analysis of multifaceted legal
arguments [6],[10].
4. Future Research Directions in Computational Models and Human
Experience
4.1.1. Advanced Computational Models in Multimodal Argumentation
Future research could explore developing more sophisticated AI systems capable of
understanding and simulating Kisceral Argumentation [4],[9]. This involves creating algorithms
that can interpret and respond to arguments' emotional and intuitive aspects, going beyond
logical reasoning. Research could focus on how AI can be trained to recognize and replicate the
subtleties of human emotions and non-verbal cues in argumentation, potentially using deep
learning and neural networks [5],[10].
4.1.2. AudioSonic Resonance and AI-Driven Therapeutic Applications
There is signi icant potential for research in integrating AudioSonic Resonance with AI to
create personalized therapeutic experiences [2],[8]. Future studies could investigate how
different sound frequencies and compositions affect mental well-being and how AI can be used
to tailor these soundscapes to individual needs. This research could extend into developing AI-
driven music therapy applications that adapt to the user's emotional state and physiological
responses in real-time [1],[7].
4.1.3. Exploring Secular Mysticism in Digital Environments
Research in this area could focus on how digital platforms and AI can be used to understand
and facilitate secular mystical experiences [5],[10]. This might include using virtual reality to
create immersive spiritual experiences or developing AI systems that can analyze and interpret
discussions of mysticism in digital forums. The goal would be to understand how these
experiences are communicated and perceived in the digital age and how technology can
enhance our understanding of them [2],[8].
4.1.4. Ethical Implications and Responsible Use of AI in Argumentation
f
f
An important area of future research is the ethical implications of using AI in argumentation
and persuasion [1],[7]. This includes studying the potential for manipulation and the impact of
AI on human autonomy and decision-making. Research could focus on developing ethical
guidelines and frameworks for the responsible use of AI in argumentation, ensuring that these
technologies are used to enhance understanding and empathy rather than for deceit or
manipulation [4],[9].
4.1.5. Cross-Cultural Studies on Argumentation and Technology
Given the global nature of digital communication, future research should also explore how
different cultures perceive and engage with AI-driven argumentation [2],[8]. This could involve
comparative studies on the reception of AI-generated arguments across different cultural
contexts and the role of cultural nuances in shaping the effectiveness of these arguments [1],[7].
5. Conclusion & Further Discussion
The con luence of traditional rhetoric and contemporary computational advancements
marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of natural argumentation [1],[4]. The interdisciplinary
melding of Kisceral Argumentation, AudioSonic Resonance, Secular Mysticism, and Natural
Argumentation heralds a new era in which the signi icance of sound and spiritual experiences is
reimagined, inding profound applications across diverse ields such as AI, therapy, and
education [2],[5],[7].
As we navigate this promising landscape, it is imperative to tread with caution and
integrity. Our collective duty is to harness these advancements' immense potential ethically,
championing genuine, informed discourse while remaining vigilant against the pitfalls of
manipulation and deceit [3],[6],[9].
References
1. M. A. Finlayson, Argumentation and Natural Language Processing: How Computers Argue, J.
Argumentation in Context 8 (2) (2019) 134–153. URL: https://www.jbe-platform.com/
content/journals/10.1075/jaic.8.2.02 in.
2. T. F. Gordon, H. Prakken, D. Walton, The Carneades Model of Argument and Burden of Proof,
Artif. Intell. 171 (10-15) (2007) 875–896. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/
article/pii/S0004370207000418.
3. M. D. Green, The Nature and Aesthetics of Design, J. Des. Hist. 30 (3) (2017) 283–297. URL:
https://academic.oup.com/jdh/article-abstract/30/3/283/3862504.
4. J. Lawrence, C. Reed, Argument Mining: A Survey, Comput. Linguist. 45 (4) (2018) 765–818.
URL: https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.1162/COLI_a_00364.
5. A. Peldszus, M. Stede, From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts: A Survey,
Int. J. Cogn. Inform. Nat. Intell. (IJCINI) 7 (1) (2013) 1–31. URL: https://www.igi-global.com/
article/from-argument-diagrams-to-argumentation-mining-in-texts/76358.
6. H. Prakken, An Abstract Framework for Argumentation with Structured Arguments,
Argument Comput. 1 (2) (2010) 93–124. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/
10.1080/19462166.2010.486483.
7. E. Rahwan, P. Pasquier, Argumentation in Arti icial Intelligence: Trends and Challenges, J.
Logic Comput. 26 (2) (2016) 619–639. URL: https://academic.oup.com/logcom/article/
26/2/619/2359336.
8. J. Schneider, T. Groza, A. Passant, A Review of Argumentation for the Social Semantic Web,
Semant. Web 4 (2) (2013) 159–218. URL: https://content.iospress.com/articles/semantic-
web/sw104.
9. B. Verheij, Arguments about Arguments: Formal, Computational, and Philosophical
Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, 2017. URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/
books/arguments-about-arguments/3C8C8E3C8A8AB5784F2C5B64008357A2.
10.D. Walton, C. Reed, F. Macagno, Argumentation Schemes, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
U R L : h t t p s : / / w w w. c a m b r i d g e . o r g / c o r e / b o o k s / a r g u m e n t a t i o n - s c h e m e s /
3B9C9E3E5A9CE3E1A707BB95D0B6C2A6.
f
f
f
f
f
f
Glossary
1. AudioSonic Resonance: The physical or scienti ic properties of sound and the ability to
resonate on a "kisceral" level—engaging the mind and the emotional and spiritual aspects of
human experience. It serves as a medium for argumentation or persuasion that goes beyond
the cognitive to include the emotional and spiritual, making it a multi-modal form of
communication.
2. Kisceral Argumentation: A sophisticated and integrative mode of reasoning that fuses
cognitive, emotional, and sensory dimensions to create compelling and persuasive
arguments. The term "kisceral" is a portmanteau of 'kinaesthetic' and 'visceral,' capturing the
essence of its dual focus on both the physical and emotional aspects of the human experience.
Unlike traditional forms of argumentation that prioritize logical consistency and objective
truth, kisceral argumentation recognizes the importance of emotional resonance and sensory
engagement in in luencing human cognition and decision-making.
3. Multi-modal Argumentation (Michael Gilbert): A comprehensive framework for
understanding argumentation that goes beyond traditional logical or mechanical forms.
Gilbert's model incorporates various modes or dimensions of argumentation, including
emotional, logical, and what he terms 'kisceral' modes. This multi-modal approach allows a
more nuanced understanding of how arguments are constructed and received, emphasizing
mechanical and cognitive argumentation forms.
4. Multimodal (Groarke): The lexibility and diversity of the 'material' used to construct
arguments. Unlike traditional models that may rely solely on verbal or written forms of
communication, Groarke's multimodal perspective accommodates a wide range of elements,
including words, text, visuals, and auditory components. This approach allows for a more
comprehensive and nuanced form of argumentation that can engage the audience on
multiple levels, be it emotional, logical, or sensory.
5. Secular Mysticism: Refers to the exploration and experience of profound, non-religious
spiritual states rooted in the human condition rather than any particular religious doctrine. It
aims to understand the transformative power of such experiences on mental well-being and
their potential for fostering deep emotional and intuitive insights.
f
f
f