The Interplay of Multimodal Argumentation, AudioSonic Resonance, Secular Mysticism, and Natural Argumentation in Computational Models Loris Isabettini University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, ON N9B 3P4 Abstract "Can machines truly capture the profound resonance of human argumentation?" As we delve into this question, the landscape of natural argumentation is undergoing a transformative evolution, integrating not just computational models and arti icial intelligence [1],[7] but also the profound intersections of Multimodal Argumentation and Secular Mysticism. Drawing from groundbreaking research into the transformative power of sound and its implications in mental well-being and therapeutic applications, this evolution paints a richer tapestry of argumentation, bridging diverse disciplines [4],[8]. Keywords Computational Models in Argumentation, Multimodal Argumentation, Secular Mysticism, Transformative Power of Sound, Mental Well-being and Therapy, Natural Argumentation Theory, Cognitive In luences in Argumentation, Linguistic Nuances in Argumentation, AI and Legal Argumentation, Ethical Considerations in AI Argumentation, Secular Mysticism in Digital Discourse, Cross-Cultural Argumentation Analysis, AudioSonic Resonance and Therapy, Future of AI in Argumentation. 1 1. Bridging Traditional Argumentation and Computational Methodologies: The Role of Secular Mysticism and Multimodal Communication The essence of this paper lies in exploring how traditional argumentation theories can be harmonized with modern computational methodologies, mainly focusing on the profound spiritual experiences explored in Secular Mysticism [9],[10]. We are on the cusp of a deeper understanding of argumentation's essence, where the multimodal nature of human communication intersects with the non-tangible yet deeply impactful elements of Secular Mysticism. This journey through a multifaceted landscape spotlights the con luence of paradigms, the genesis of genuine arguments, and the challenges and triumphs ahead. It echoes the interdisciplinary insights from recent research on the transformative power of sound and its therapeutic applications [5],[3], all while navigating the dynamic terrain of natural argumentation, celebrating its rich past, vibrant present, and promising, harmonious future [10],[7]. Natural arguments, as encountered in everyday discourse, differ signi icantly from the structured, formal arguments often studied in logic and philosophy [1],[4]. These arguments are embedded in our conversations, debates, and discussions, re lecting the complexities and nuances of human thought and communication. In this context, Multimodal Argumentation becomes particularly relevant. It encompasses not just the verbal or written aspects of argumentation but also the non-verbal cues, the tonal variations, and the contextual settings integral to human interaction [8]. This multimodal perspective is crucial in understanding the full spectrum of argumentation, especially when it intersects with the spiritual and existential dimensions explored in Secular Mysticism. CMNA 23: Computational Models of Natural Argument isabett@uwindsor.ca 0000-0002-9366-4863 © 2023 Copyright for this paper by its author. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org) CEUR ceur-ws.org Workshop ISSN 1613-0073 Proceedings f f f f f 1.1. Generation, Mining, and Models: 1.1.1.Multimodal Argumentation in Computational Models In a classroom setting, the principles of Kisceral Argumentation are employed, but with a distinct emphasis on Multimodal Argumentation. This approach recognizes that arguments are not just verbal or textual but can be conveyed through multiple modes, such as music, visuals, and even physical expressions [5]. An AI-driven platform in this scenario simulates scenarios that integrate opera performances with visual and textual elements, creating a rich, multimodal learning experience. The AI system is designed to analyze vocal in lections, musical crescendos, visual cues, and body language, synthesizing these elements to generate comprehensive arguments and counterarguments [6]. This multimodal approach re lects the complexity of human communication and argumentation, providing students with a more holistic understanding of discourse [7]. 1.1.2. Secular Mysticism in Digital Discourse The exploration of Secular Mysticism in digital discourse is deepened by focusing on how spiritual experiences, devoid of religious connotations, are communicated and understood in the digital age [7]. AI tools equipped with natural language processing and sentiment analysis delve into online discussions about Secular Mysticism, identifying patterns and themes and the emotional undertones and spiritual nuances in these conversations [4],[6]. This approach provides a unique insight into how secular spiritual experiences are articulated and perceived in various cultural contexts, highlighting the role of language and emotion in conveying mystical experiences [1],[3]. 1.1.3. Argumentation Mining and Computational Linguistics While maintaining its role in extracting core arguments and counterarguments from online content, the focus shifts to how these tools can be used to understand and analyze multimodal and mystical arguments [5],[7]. The AI models are trained to recognize logical structures and rhetorical devices and interpret non-verbal cues and emotional tones, particularly in discussions involving Secular Mysticism [3],[8]. This comprehensive analysis extends beyond traditional text-based argumentation, embracing the complexity of multimodal communication [6],[9]. 1.1.4. Argumentation Mining and Computational Linguistics In the legal domain, AI models are adapted to recognize and analyze arguments incorporating Secular Mysticism and Multimodal Argumentation elements [7],[9]. These models assist attorneys and judges in understanding and interpreting arguments that may involve non- traditional forms of evidence or reasoning, such as emotional appeals or cultural references [6], [8]. The AI's ability to process and integrate diverse forms of argumentation enhances legal decision-making, providing a more nuanced understanding of cases that involve complex human experiences [3],[5]. 2. Philosophical and Rhetorical Dimensions in Computational Argumentation 2.1.1. Philosophical Implications of Integrating Multimodal Argumentation and AI The fusion of Multimodal Argumentation with AI technologies raises profound philosophical questions about the nature of argumentation, communication, and understanding [1],[7]. Traditionally, argumentation has been viewed through logic and rhetoric, focusing primarily on verbal and written discourse [2],[4]. However, including non-verbal indications (such as those found in opera) and the emotional resonance of sound challenges this view, suggesting a more holistic understanding of argumentation that encompasses multiple modes of human expression [3],[9]. This shift aligns with the philosophical notion that human experience and f f communication are inherently multimodal and that understanding these experiences requires synthesizing various sensory inputs and cognitive processes [5],[10]. 2.1.2. Rhetorical Analysis in the Age of AI and Secular Mysticism Rhetoric, the art of persuasion, has traditionally been centred on the use of language [2]. However, integrating Secular Mysticism and AudioSonic Resonance into computational models introduces a new dimension to rhetorical analysis [7],[9]. Persuasion can also occur through non-verbal means, such as music and sound, which can evoke profound emotional responses and alter states of consciousness [3]. This expansion of rhetoric challenges traditional boundaries and opens new avenues for exploring how persuasion occurs in various cultural and spiritual contexts [5],[10]. 2.1.3. Ethical Considerations in Computational Argumentation Ethical considerations become increasingly important as AI systems become more adept at understanding and generating multimodal arguments [1],[10]. The ability of AI to analyze and in luence human emotions and beliefs through sound and visual cues raises questions about manipulation and consent [3],[9]. Philosophically, this leads to reevaluating the ethics of persuasion and the responsibilities of those who design and deploy such systems [2],[4]. Ensuring these technologies enhance understanding and empathy rather than exploit vulnerabilities or biases is crucial [5],[10]. 2.1.4. The Future of Argumentation in a Digitally-Connected World Looking forward, integrating these diverse elements in computational models points to a future where argumentation is not just a tool for debate or persuasion but a means of fostering more profound understanding and connection across cultural and spiritual divides [4],[6]. Using AI to analyze and generate arguments based on Secular Mysticism and AudioSonic Resonance can bridge gaps in knowledge and bring diverse perspectives into dialogue with one another [7], [8]. This has signi icant implications for global communication, education, and con lict resolution, suggesting a future where technology enhances, rather than diminishes, our shared humanity [1],[5]. 3. Practical Applications and Case Studies in Computational Contexts 3.1.1. Case Study 1: Multimodal Argumentation in Educational AI Systems Scenario: An AI-driven educational platform is designed to teach argumentation skills using opera as a medium [9]. The venue, equipped with advanced language and image processing capabilities, analyzes opera performances, integrating musical, textual, and visual elements to create comprehensive argumentative scenarios [1],[3]. Application: Students interact with the AI system, which presents arguments based on an opera's narrative, music, and visual cues [5],[7]. For instance, the AI might generate an argument on the ethical dilemmas presented in Mozart's "Don Giovanni," using the character's vocal expressions, lyrical content, and stage actions [2],[4]. Students are then tasked with formulating counterarguments, encouraging them to consider multiple modes of communication in their reasoning [6],[8]. Analysis: The effectiveness of this approach is evaluated by assessing improvements in students' argumentation skills, their ability to interpret multimodal cues, and their engagement with the material [10]. This case study demonstrates the potential of AI in enhancing learning experiences by integrating diverse communicative modes. 3.1.2. Case Study 2: ChatGPT and Secular Mysticism in Online Forums Scenario: A research project utilizes ChatGPT to analyze discussions on Secular Mysticism in online forums. The model is trained to identify key themes, emotional tones, and argumentative structures in these discussions [1],[5]. f f f Application: ChatGPT processes large volumes of text from various online platforms, focusing on conversations about personal spiritual experiences unrelated to any religion. The model identi ies common patterns, such as using metaphorical language or expressing profound personal transformations [3],[4]. Analysis: The effectiveness of ChatGPT in this context is evaluated based on its ability to accurately capture the essence of Secular Mysticism in digital discourse and the insights it provides into how these experiences are communicated and perceived [7],[9]. This case study highlights the role of AI in understanding complex, emotionally charged topics in digital communication [2],[6],[8]. 3.1.3. Case Study 3: Legal Argumentation Analysis with AI Scenario: An AI model is developed to assist in analyzing legal arguments that incorporate elements of Secular Mysticism and Multimodal Argumentation, particularly in cases involving cultural and emotional nuances [7],[9]. Application: The AI system is used in a mock trial setting, where it analyzes arguments presented by attorneys that include references to cultural practices and non-verbal cues [2],[5]. The model evaluates the arguments for logical coherence, emotional appeal, and cultural relevance [4],[8]. Analysis: The model's effectiveness is assessed based on its accuracy in interpreting complex arguments and its utility in providing insights to legal professionals [1],[3]. This case study explores the potential of AI in enhancing the understanding and analysis of multifaceted legal arguments [6],[10]. 4. Future Research Directions in Computational Models and Human Experience 4.1.1. Advanced Computational Models in Multimodal Argumentation Future research could explore developing more sophisticated AI systems capable of understanding and simulating Kisceral Argumentation [4],[9]. This involves creating algorithms that can interpret and respond to arguments' emotional and intuitive aspects, going beyond logical reasoning. Research could focus on how AI can be trained to recognize and replicate the subtleties of human emotions and non-verbal cues in argumentation, potentially using deep learning and neural networks [5],[10]. 4.1.2. AudioSonic Resonance and AI-Driven Therapeutic Applications There is signi icant potential for research in integrating AudioSonic Resonance with AI to create personalized therapeutic experiences [2],[8]. Future studies could investigate how different sound frequencies and compositions affect mental well-being and how AI can be used to tailor these soundscapes to individual needs. This research could extend into developing AI- driven music therapy applications that adapt to the user's emotional state and physiological responses in real-time [1],[7]. 4.1.3. Exploring Secular Mysticism in Digital Environments Research in this area could focus on how digital platforms and AI can be used to understand and facilitate secular mystical experiences [5],[10]. This might include using virtual reality to create immersive spiritual experiences or developing AI systems that can analyze and interpret discussions of mysticism in digital forums. The goal would be to understand how these experiences are communicated and perceived in the digital age and how technology can enhance our understanding of them [2],[8]. 4.1.4. Ethical Implications and Responsible Use of AI in Argumentation f f An important area of future research is the ethical implications of using AI in argumentation and persuasion [1],[7]. This includes studying the potential for manipulation and the impact of AI on human autonomy and decision-making. Research could focus on developing ethical guidelines and frameworks for the responsible use of AI in argumentation, ensuring that these technologies are used to enhance understanding and empathy rather than for deceit or manipulation [4],[9]. 4.1.5. Cross-Cultural Studies on Argumentation and Technology Given the global nature of digital communication, future research should also explore how different cultures perceive and engage with AI-driven argumentation [2],[8]. This could involve comparative studies on the reception of AI-generated arguments across different cultural contexts and the role of cultural nuances in shaping the effectiveness of these arguments [1],[7]. 5. Conclusion & Further Discussion The con luence of traditional rhetoric and contemporary computational advancements marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of natural argumentation [1],[4]. The interdisciplinary melding of Kisceral Argumentation, AudioSonic Resonance, Secular Mysticism, and Natural Argumentation heralds a new era in which the signi icance of sound and spiritual experiences is reimagined, inding profound applications across diverse ields such as AI, therapy, and education [2],[5],[7]. As we navigate this promising landscape, it is imperative to tread with caution and integrity. Our collective duty is to harness these advancements' immense potential ethically, championing genuine, informed discourse while remaining vigilant against the pitfalls of manipulation and deceit [3],[6],[9]. References 1. M. A. Finlayson, Argumentation and Natural Language Processing: How Computers Argue, J. Argumentation in Context 8 (2) (2019) 134–153. URL: https://www.jbe-platform.com/ content/journals/10.1075/jaic.8.2.02 in. 2. T. F. Gordon, H. Prakken, D. Walton, The Carneades Model of Argument and Burden of Proof, Artif. Intell. 171 (10-15) (2007) 875–896. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0004370207000418. 3. M. D. Green, The Nature and Aesthetics of Design, J. Des. Hist. 30 (3) (2017) 283–297. URL: https://academic.oup.com/jdh/article-abstract/30/3/283/3862504. 4. J. Lawrence, C. Reed, Argument Mining: A Survey, Comput. Linguist. 45 (4) (2018) 765–818. URL: https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.1162/COLI_a_00364. 5. A. Peldszus, M. Stede, From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts: A Survey, Int. J. Cogn. Inform. Nat. Intell. (IJCINI) 7 (1) (2013) 1–31. URL: https://www.igi-global.com/ article/from-argument-diagrams-to-argumentation-mining-in-texts/76358. 6. H. Prakken, An Abstract Framework for Argumentation with Structured Arguments, Argument Comput. 1 (2) (2010) 93–124. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/ 10.1080/19462166.2010.486483. 7. E. Rahwan, P. Pasquier, Argumentation in Arti icial Intelligence: Trends and Challenges, J. Logic Comput. 26 (2) (2016) 619–639. URL: https://academic.oup.com/logcom/article/ 26/2/619/2359336. 8. J. Schneider, T. Groza, A. Passant, A Review of Argumentation for the Social Semantic Web, Semant. Web 4 (2) (2013) 159–218. URL: https://content.iospress.com/articles/semantic- web/sw104. 9. B. Verheij, Arguments about Arguments: Formal, Computational, and Philosophical Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, 2017. URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/ books/arguments-about-arguments/3C8C8E3C8A8AB5784F2C5B64008357A2. 10.D. Walton, C. Reed, F. Macagno, Argumentation Schemes, Cambridge University Press, 2008. U R L : h t t p s : / / w w w. c a m b r i d g e . o r g / c o r e / b o o k s / a r g u m e n t a t i o n - s c h e m e s / 3B9C9E3E5A9CE3E1A707BB95D0B6C2A6. f f f f f f Glossary 1. AudioSonic Resonance: The physical or scienti ic properties of sound and the ability to resonate on a "kisceral" level—engaging the mind and the emotional and spiritual aspects of human experience. It serves as a medium for argumentation or persuasion that goes beyond the cognitive to include the emotional and spiritual, making it a multi-modal form of communication. 2. Kisceral Argumentation: A sophisticated and integrative mode of reasoning that fuses cognitive, emotional, and sensory dimensions to create compelling and persuasive arguments. The term "kisceral" is a portmanteau of 'kinaesthetic' and 'visceral,' capturing the essence of its dual focus on both the physical and emotional aspects of the human experience. Unlike traditional forms of argumentation that prioritize logical consistency and objective truth, kisceral argumentation recognizes the importance of emotional resonance and sensory engagement in in luencing human cognition and decision-making. 3. Multi-modal Argumentation (Michael Gilbert): A comprehensive framework for understanding argumentation that goes beyond traditional logical or mechanical forms. Gilbert's model incorporates various modes or dimensions of argumentation, including emotional, logical, and what he terms 'kisceral' modes. This multi-modal approach allows a more nuanced understanding of how arguments are constructed and received, emphasizing mechanical and cognitive argumentation forms. 4. Multimodal (Groarke): The lexibility and diversity of the 'material' used to construct arguments. Unlike traditional models that may rely solely on verbal or written forms of communication, Groarke's multimodal perspective accommodates a wide range of elements, including words, text, visuals, and auditory components. This approach allows for a more comprehensive and nuanced form of argumentation that can engage the audience on multiple levels, be it emotional, logical, or sensory. 5. Secular Mysticism: Refers to the exploration and experience of profound, non-religious spiritual states rooted in the human condition rather than any particular religious doctrine. It aims to understand the transformative power of such experiences on mental well-being and their potential for fostering deep emotional and intuitive insights. f f f