<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1613-0073</issn>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Stages of Cluster Analysis in the Diagnosis of Lyme Disease in Children</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Sverstiuk</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vasyl Martsenyuk</string-name>
          <email>vmartsenyuk@ath.bielsko.pl</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Svitlana Nykytyuk</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Yuri Palaniza</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Oksana Bahrii-Zaiats</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Sofiia</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Workshop</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>12 Rus'ka St., Ternopil, 46001</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Ternopil</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Ternopil National Pedagogical University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>2 Maxyma Kryvonosa St., Ternopil, 46027</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>University of Bielsko-Biala</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Willowa St. 2, Bielsko-Biala, 43-300</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="PL">Poland</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Lyme borreliosis (LB) is the most common vector-mediated disease caused by spirochetes of the Borrelia burgdorfery sensu lato(s.l) complex, which are vectored by Ixodes ticks. The disease tends to be prolonged and chronic. The aim of this study was to develop a multifactorial model for predicting the severe course of Lyme borreliosis in children and to evaluate its effectiveness using Claster analysis and PCA methods. Silhoutte scor method and the CalinskiHorabasz score methods were used for developing mathematical prognosis of severe forms LB. To build a prognostic model of Claster analysis, 143 patients with Lyme disease were examined using multivariate regression analysis who were admitted to the Ternopil Regional Children's Hospital. The model was clustered based on the coefficients. The sum of points from 1 to 10 indicates a mild form of the disease, from 10 to 20 - a severe form of the disease. Therefore, the result is that the Localised form is mild and severe and the Disseminated form is divided into mild and severe.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Lyme disease</kwd>
        <kwd>children</kwd>
        <kwd>Claster analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>PCA methods</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>2020 Copyright for this paper by its authors.
CEUR</p>
      <p>ceur-ws.org</p>
      <p>Only children with localized form (erythema migrans) and disseminated form were admitted to the
Ternopil children's regional hospital.</p>
      <p>
        According to European authors, LB manifests itself as a skin disease in 80-90 % of patients, while
lesions of other organs and systems are reported in about 10-20 % of patients [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5 ref6 ref7">5-7</xref>
        ]. Insufficient
consideration of the epidemiological history, hereditary and allergic history leads to misdiagnosis and
possible errors in the treatment of the disease. Hematogenous spread of the bacteria occurs within days
or weeks after a tick bite; the host's immune response often leads to specific symptoms [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>The Aim of the study was to analyse clinical and immunological cases of the disease, to identify the
main markers leading to chronicity of the disease, to optimise the diagnostic search using mathematical
analysis, to develop a multifactorial model for predicting the severe course and damage to organs and
systems in Lyme borreliosis in children and to evaluate its effectiveness using Claster analysis and PCA
methods.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Materials and methods</title>
      <p>In the research difeerent materials and methods were used, such as general clinical (questionnaire),
objective examination, immunological-ELISA (total antibodies of classes M and G to antigens of the
Borrelia burgdorfery complex sensu lato(s.l), immunoblot specific antibodies of classes M and G to B.
burgdorfery sensu lato (s. l), epidemiological (unified questionnaire), molecular biological, statistical
(methods of parametric and non-parametric statistics with the calculation of Student's criteria using the
computer programs "Microsoft Office Excel" and "Statistica").</p>
      <p>To build a prognostic model of Claster analysis, 143 patients with Lyme disease were examined
using multivariate regression analysis who were admitted to the Ternopil Regional Children's Hospital.
The study was conducted in the laboratory of the Center for the Study of LB and Other Tick-Borne
Infections. 143 children with Lyme disease were examined (aged 13±3 years) from 1 year to 18 years,
including 74 boys and 70 girls. Groups of patients: 80 children with erythema migrans, 16 with Lyme
arthritis, and 27 with nervous system damage due to Lyme disease and non erythema forms 20 children.</p>
      <p>
        The study participants answered the questions of a single international questionnaire. The detection
of Borrelia in ticks was performed by the polymerase chain reaction PCR method [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Methods of</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Examination</title>
        <sec id="sec-2-2-1">
          <title>General clinical</title>
          <p>(complaints, medical
history, life history,
physical
examination)
Laborato
ry
tests
(ESR,
CRP,
RF)
Elisa
(ІL-1,
ІL-10)
Two-stage
serological
diagnostics of
LB (ELISA,
Immunoblot)
Lipid
peroxi
dation
(LPO)
Instrumenta
l (RTG,
ultrasound,
MRI of
joints)
Statistical
methods</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>Patient classification criteria</title>
        <p>Group 1
Patients with ME</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-3-1">
          <title>Group with LA 2</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-3-2">
          <title>Patients</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-3-3">
          <title>Group 3 patients with lesions of the NS</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-3-4">
          <title>Group 4 Patients erythemafree form</title>
          <p>Formation of initial data for regression analysis (factor and outcome variables)</p>
          <p>Factors included
forecasting model (р&lt;0,05)
in
the</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>Factors not included in forecasting model (р&lt;0,05) the</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-5">
        <title>Development of a multivariate regression</title>
        <p>model for forecasting the CRDDFLD (Bb)</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-6">
        <title>Estimating residual deviations for compliance with the normal distribution law</title>
        <p></p>
        <p>Estimation of the coefficients of
determination of the Nijelkerk (R2)
 Dispersion analysis of the forecasting</p>
        <p>model
Multivariate regression analysis method
КРНПРА (Bb)</p>
        <p>ROC- analysis of a regression forecasting model
Building a source table to verify the forecasting model
PSLBКРРВПЛБ
Sensitivity</p>
        <p>Specificity

relationLR+ 
relationLR</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-7">
        <title>Accuracy PVN PV</title>
        <p>PRR</p>
        <p>R</p>
        <p>RRRR
Construction of ROC-curves</p>
        <p>Claster analysis</p>
        <p>Silhoutte score and Calinski-Horabasz score
1. Inclusion criteria:
- epidemiological (residence in an endemic area);
- Clinical complaints of patients (erythematous skin lesions, cardiovascular system lesions, Lyme
arthritis, clinical signs of nervous system lesions);
two clusters.
two clusters.</p>
        <p>where
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•</p>
        <p>(r, s) = max (dist(xri, xsj)) , i ∈ (i, . . . , n ), j ∈ (1, . . . , n )
Average linkage uses the average distance between all pairs of objects in any two clusters.
 (r, s) =</p>
        <p>1
n n
n
 n</p>
        <p>∑</p>
        <p>∑ dist(xri, xsj)
 =1  =1
Centroid linkage uses the Euclidean distance between the centroids of the two clusters.</p>
        <p>(r, s) = min(dist(xri, xsj)), i ∈ (i, . . . , n ), j ∈ (1, . . . , n )</p>
        <p>Complete linkage, also called farthest neighbor, uses the largest distance between objects in the
clusters  and  ,  ̃ is defined recursively as
where  ̃ and  ̃ are weighted centroids for the clusters r and s. If cluster r was created by combining</p>
        <p>Ward's linkage uses the incremental sum of squares, that is, the increase in the total
withincluster sum of squares as a result of joining two clusters. The within-cluster sum of squares is defined
as the sum of the squares of the distances between all objects in the cluster and the centroid of the
cluster. The sum of squares metric is equivalent to the following distance metric  ( ,  ), which is the
formula linkage uses.</p>
        <p>- infectious confirmation of the diagnosis: a two-stage study.</p>
        <p>The following notation describes the linkages used by the various methods:</p>
        <p>Cluster  is formed from clusters  and  .
  is the number of objects in cluster  .
  is the ith object in cluster  .</p>
        <p>Single linkage, also called nearest neighbor, uses the smallest distance between objects in the
 ( ,  ) = √
2   
(  +  )
‖ ̅ −  ̅‖2,
where
o
o
o
‖</p>
        <p>‖2is the Euclidean distance.
 ̅ and  ̅ are the centroids of clusters  and  .
  and   are the number of elements in clusters  and  .</p>
        <p>Median linkage uses the Euclidean distance between weighted centroids of the two clusters.
 (r, s) = ‖x̅r − x̅s‖2,
x̅r =
1
n

n</p>
        <p>∑ xri
 =1
 (r, s) = ‖x̃r − x̃s‖2,
d(r,s)=‖‖˜xr−˜xs‖‖2,
1
2
x̃r =</p>
        <p>( ̃ +  ̃ )</p>
        <p>In some references, Ward's linkage does not use the factor of 2 multiplying nrns. The linkage
function uses this factor so that the distance between two singleton clusters is the same as the Euclidean
distance.</p>
        <p>• Weighted average linkage uses a recursive definition for the distance between two clusters. If
cluster r was created by combining clusters p and q, the distance between r and another cluster s is
defined as the average of the distance between p and s and the distance between q and s.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-8">
        <title>A linkage is the distance between two clusters.</title>
        <p>( ,  ) =
( ( ,  ) +  ( ,  ))
2</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Cluster analysis</title>
      <p>Using multivariate regression analysis, we analysed 28 probable factors for the onset and
progression of Lyme borreliosis.</p>
      <p>After conducting the classical method of determining the number of clusters in our general sample,
the classical approach was to use 2 methods: Silhoutte score and Calinski-Horabasz score.</p>
      <p>We can see that the result of the first method (Silhoutte score) tends to be closer to 3 clusters, while
the second method (Calinski-Horabasz) fluctuates between three and four clusters, although it is more
inclined to four clusters in our overall sample (larger break at four clusters).</p>
      <p>Further cluster analysis is carried out by analysing two principal components. Figure 3 shows a tree
dendrogram.</p>
      <p>According to the first message (Figure 3), the distance between the centres of the clusters is shown
on the -Y axis, and the number of clusters or iteration numbers is shown on the X axis. We find the
centre of mass (0 on the Y-axis) of the cluster. We start from this point 0, and start counting the number
of clusters from this point.</p>
      <p>We find the only centre of mass whose standard deviation to each of the points is maximum.We set
up two classes.</p>
      <p>Our tree has branched into two branches, in particular, in the second iteration (2 on the x-axis), our
data is branched into two branches: one thinner and longer branch branches upwards, and a shorter and
thicker branch is placed at the bottom of the figure. The thickness of the branches is proportional to the
number of patients in the respective cluster. In particular, we observe that the thickness of the bottom
cluster is twice the thickness of the top cluster. In this analysis, we study the number of similar groups.</p>
      <p>The next step is to iterate with three clusters. We observe further potential branching of the branches
and the tree clusterogram.</p>
      <p>Analysing Figure 3 along the vertical positional line numbered 3 on the x-axis, which is parallel to
the y-axis.</p>
      <p>• Computing linkage (Y) can be slow when y is a vector representation of the distance matrix.
For the 'centroid', 'median', and 'ward' methods, linkage checks whether y is a Euclidean distance. Avoid
this time-consuming check by passing in X instead of Y.</p>
      <p>• The 'centroid' and 'median' methods can produce a cluster tree that is not monotonic. This result
occurs when the distance from the union of two clusters, r and s, to a third cluster is less than the distance
between r and s. In this case, in a dendrogram drawn with the default orientation, the path from a leaf
to the root node takes some downward steps. To avoid this result, use another method. This figure shows
a nonmonotonic cluster tree.</p>
      <p>To evaluate the significance of the influence of the factor attributes, a stepwise multivariate
regression analysis was performed using Statistica 10.0. Initially, a correlation matrix was obtained, in
which the absence of pairwise correlation coefficients greater than 0.7 was established. Thus, the
absence of multicollinear factors for predicting the severity of LD gives grounds to use all 28 of the
above factors to build a regression model. The next step was to calculate the regression coefficients "b"
(Beta), which reflect for each selected factor the relationship of influence on the severity of Lyme
borreliosis in the examined patients. The result of obtaining significant factors for this coefficient in
multivariate regression analysis in Statistica 10.0 is shown in Figure 4.</p>
      <p>Based on the results of the multivariate regression analysis of predicting the development of severe
Lyme borreliosis, which are shown in Figure 6 and Table 1, we build a mathematical model to determine
the coefficient of risk factors of developing LB (CRFDLB):</p>
      <p>To evaluate the quality of the regression model, it was necessary to analyse the residual deviations,
in particular, to obtain their histogram (Figure 7). As can be seen from the histogram, the residual
deviations are distributed symmetrically, approaching the curve of the normal distribution of the
residuals, so the statistical hypothesis about their distribution in accordance with the normal distribution
law is not rejected.</p>
      <p>In order to further confirm the residual deviations from the normal distribution law, a
normalprobability graph was constructed (Figure 8). Analysing its data, we note the absence of systematic
deviations from the normal probability line. This allows us to conclude that the residual deviations are
distributed according to the normal distribution law.</p>
      <p>To check the dependence of the residual deviations on the predicted values, we construct a scatter
plot (Figure 9).</p>
      <p>Based on the results obtained, we note that the residuals relative to the predicted values are scattered
randomly, which indicates that there is no dependence on the predicted values of the CRRFLB. The
histogram and the normal probability plot confirm that the residual deviations follow the normal
distribution law. Thus, the obtained model for predicting the risk of thrombosis is qualitative and
adequate.</p>
      <p>The next step was to evaluate the overall goodness of fit of the model, for which we performed an
ANOVA analysis (Figure 10). Analysing the data obtained, we can conclude that the model for
predicting the CRRFLB is highly satisfactory in general using ANOVA analysis, since the significance
level is p&lt;0.001, and the model itself will work better than a simple forecast using average values.</p>
      <p>To further evaluate the quality of the mathematical model of the CRRFLВ, we analysed the
coefficient of determination of the Neijelkerk (R2), which shows what part of the factors is taken into
account in the forecast. It is considered a universal measure of the relationship between one random
variable and others. The coefficient of determination varies from 0 to 1. The more its value approaches
"1", the better the multivariate regression model is. In the proposed mathematical model of the
CRRFLB, the coefficient of determination is R2=0.9858 (in Statistica 10.0 R?= ,98584446 (Fig. 10)).
Thus, in our case, 98.58% of the factors are taken into account in the CRRFLB prediction model. The
coefficient of determination indicates the extent to which the observations confirm the mathematical
model.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <p>
        Nonspecific symptoms, such as arthralgias, myalgias, fatigue, headaches, irritability, stiff neck
muscles, and paresthesias, often last for a long time. Systemic symptoms, including myalgia and
arthralgia, can accompany EM, especially in Bb and Bg infections [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        LA is manifested by fever, persistent monoarthritis, and synovitis. Children with joint involvement
caused by Lyme disease have more frequent knee involvement, pain, myalgia, and lower peripheral
leukocyte counts; they are less likely to have fever compared to children with septic arthritis [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ].
Serologic tests (ELISA and immunoblot) are the gold standard for verifying the diagnosis even in the
absence of an epidemiologic history. The main immunodominant proteins are OspC, VlSE, OspA,
BmpA, p66, P83/100. Thus, innate and adaptive forms of immunity are mobilized to fight the infection.
Most often, specific IgM antibodies in the immunoblot are detected against antigens P18, OspC, P39,
P41 from B. afzelii strains; P39, p 41, P 66, P83 from B. garinii strains; OspC, OspA from B. burgdorferi
sensu stricto strains. Small amounts of Ig M to flagellin P41 and the membrane protein OspC are
detected in the first days of the disease. Their titers increase over 4-6 weeks, and in untreated patients
longer.
      </p>
      <p>
        During the period of generalization of the infectious process, IgG against a number of proteins, such
as P39, P58, appear. At the late stage of the disease, a wide range of antibodies to borrelia proteins
P83/100, P58, P43, P39, P30, P21 Osp17, P14 appear [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref8 ref9">8, 9,10</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Genetic testing for HLA antigen B27 is essential in the differential diagnosis of arthritis [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]. The
presence of HLA-B27 is associated with certain autoimmune and immune-mediated diseases, including
ankylosing spondylitis, which causes inflammation of the spinal bones, and reactive arthritis. In three
patients with arthritis, we discovered a gene HLA-B27.
      </p>
      <p>Additional B. burgdorferi epitopes may be involved in the development of antibiotic-resistant Lyme
arthritis. OspA163-175 remains the only known recognized epitope of BB and related diseases [12].</p>
      <p>Patients with antibiotic-resistant arthritis usually have certain HLA-DRB1 molecules that bind the
B. burgdorferi epitope to the outer surface (OspA163-175), and the cellular and humoral immune
response to OspA is greater than in patients with antibiotic-responsive arthritis [13].</p>
      <p>A number of scientific works have used the method of mathematical forecasting to assess the course
of diseases [14,15,16]. To develop the model, we conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical and
laboratory data from a cohort of pediatric patients diagnosed with Lyme borreliosis. We then developed
a scoring system based on these factors and evaluated its performance using ROC analysis [17]. The
addition of the group of patients with erythema-free form in the cluster analysis resulted in a division
into four clusters.</p>
      <p>Initial factors are after constructing the correlation matrix without taking into account the number
of bites (X3), Lipid Bb (Borrelia burgdorferri) (X18), P39(IgG) (X21), and P20(IgG) (X25), there were
no multicollinear factors, as there were no pairwise correlation coefficients greater than 0.7. All of the
above 24 factors were used to build a multivariate regression model.</p>
      <p>The works [18, 19, 20, 21] consider approaches to the development of medical sensor monitoring
tools, the main component of which is data transmission through electronic communication channels
and networks [22-24]. Thanks to such approaches, appropriate sensors were used to register the
indicators, which are listed in Table 1.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Conclusions</title>
      <p>1. PCA and Claster metods should be used in diagnostic of Lyme disease
2. The model was clustered based on the coefficients. The sum of points from 1 to 10 indicates a
mild form of the disease, from 10 to 20 - a severe form of the disease. Therefore, the result is that the
Localised form is mild and severe and the Disseminated form is divided into mild and severe.</p>
      <p>[12] Biologic Markers of Antibiotic-Refractory Lyme Arthritis in Human: A Systematic Review,
Infectious Diseases &amp; Therapy, 8(2019) e5-e22. doi:10.1007/s40121-018-0223-0.</p>
      <p>[13] S. Nykytyuk, O. Boyarchuk, S. Klymnyuk, S. Levenets, The Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction
associated with doxycycline in a patient with Lyme arthritis, Reumatologia, 58 (2020) 335–338.
doi:10.5114/reum.2020.99143.</p>
      <p>[14] Musiienko V., Marushchak M., Sverstuik A., Filipyuk A., Krynytska I. Prediction Factors for
The Risk Of Hypothyroidism Development In Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Pharmacology On Line. 3
(2021) 585-594.</p>
      <p>[15] Musiienko V, Sverstiuk A, Lepyavko A, Mazur L, Danchak S, Lisnianska N. Prediction factors
for the risk of diffuse non-toxic goiter development in type 2 diabetic patients. Pol Merkur Lekarski.
2022;4. 19;50(296) 94-98. PMID: 35436270.</p>
      <p>[16] Chukur O, Pasyechko N, Bob A, Sverstiuk A. Prediction of climacteric syndrome development
in perimenopausal women with hypothyroidism. Prz Menopauzalny. 2022 :12;21(4):236-241.
doi:10.5114/pm.2022.123522.</p>
      <p>[17] Gruzieva T.S., Lekhan V.M., Ognev V.A. and others, Biostatistics: a textbook, Vinnytsia: Nova
Knyha, 2020, 384 p.</p>
      <p>[18] V. Martsenyuk, A. Sverstiuk, A. Klos-Witkowska, N. Kozodii, O. Bagriy-Zayats, I. Zubenko,
Numerical Analysis of Results Simulation of Cyber-Physical Biosensor Systems, in: 1st International
Workshop Information-Communication Techologies&amp;Embedded Systems, 14-15 November,
Mykolaiv, volume 1, 2019, pp. 149–164.</p>
      <p>[19] V. Martsenyuk, A. Sverstiuk, O. Bahrii-Zaiats, A. Klos-Witkowska, Qualitative and
Quantitative Comparative Analysis of Results of Numerical Simulation of Cyber-Physical Biosensor
Systems, in: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2022, 3309, pp. 134–149.</p>
      <p>[20] V. Martsenyuk, A. Klos-Witkowska, A. Sverstiuk, O. Bagrii-Zayats, M. Bernas, On modelling
predator-prey cellular automaton with help of lattice differential equations with time dilay: in Advances
in biotechnology. 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2018. NANO,
BIO, GREEN and SPACE TECHNOLOGIES FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 2th-8th of July. –
2018. Volume 18. pp.407-414.</p>
      <p>[21] S.V. Romaniv, Y.B. Palaniza, D.V. Vakulenko, I.Y. Galaychuk, The method of using fractal
analysis for metastatic nodules diagnostics on computer tomographic images of lungs. Horizons in
Cancer Research, March 30, 2023, v. 85, pp. 231–247.</p>
      <p>[22] L. Khvostivska, M. Khvostivskyy, V. Dunetc, I. Dediv. Mathematical and Algorithmic Support
of Detection Useful Radiosignals in Telecommunication Networks. Proceedings of the 2nd
International Workshop on Information Technologies: Theoretical and Applied Problems (ITTAP
2022). Ternopil, Ukraine, November 22-24, 2022. pp.314-318. ISSN 1613-0073.</p>
      <p>[23] L. Khvostivska, M. Khvostivskyi, I. Dediv, V. Yatskiv, Y. Palaniza. Method, Algorithm and
Computer Tool for Synphase Detection of Radio Signals in Telecommunication Networks with Noises.
Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Computer Information Technologies in Industry 4.0
(CITI 2023). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Ternopil, Ukraine, June 14-16, 2023. pp.173-180. ISSN
1613-0073.</p>
      <p>[24] M. Khvostivskyy, H. Osukhivska, L. Khvostivska, T. Lobur, D. Velychko, S. Lupenko,
T. Hovorushchenko, Mathematical modelling of daily computer network traffic. ITTAP 2021. CEUR
Workshop Proceedings. Ternopil, Ukraine, November 16-18, 2021. Vol. 3039. pp.107-111.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lyme disease (Borrelia burgdorferi): 2017 case definition</article-title>
          . URL: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/ lyme-disease/case-definition/
          <year>2017</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Chowaniec</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Starba</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Wiland</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Erythema nodosum - review of the literature</article-title>
          .
          <source>Reumatologia</source>
          ,
          <volume>54</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <year>2016</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>79</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>82</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .5114/reum.
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <volume>60217</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Stanek</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Wormser,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Gray</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Strle</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Lyme borreliosis,
          <source>Lancet</source>
          ,
          <volume>379</volume>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
          <fpage>461</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>473</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/S0140-
          <volume>66736</volume>
          (
          <issue>11</issue>
          )
          <fpage>60103</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>7</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Nykytyuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Klymnyuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Marchuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Panichev</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Klishch</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Experience of PCR research in Lyme borreliosis in children of Ternopil region</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Family Medicine &amp; Primary Care Review</source>
          ,
          <volume>24</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>334</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>335</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .5114/fmpcr.
          <year>2022</year>
          .
          <volume>120857</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Nykytyuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Klymniuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Pyvovarchuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Sverstyuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Multifactorial model for predicting the severe course and damage to organs and systems in Lyme borreliosis in children, Modern pediatrics, 2 (</article-title>
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <fpage>6</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>17</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Nykytyuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Levenets</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Horishnyi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Horishnyi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Awareness of Lyme disease among vocational school students and children (Ternopil Region</article-title>
          , Western Ukraine),
          <source>Georgian Medical News</source>
          ,
          <volume>24</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>67</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>71</lpage>
          . PMID:
          <volume>36780626</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[7] Borrelia burgdorferi peptidoglycan is a persistent antigen in patients with Lyme arthritis</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</source>
          , volume
          <volume>7</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <year>2019</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>e13498</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>e13507</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1073/pnas.1904170116.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Norman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Antig</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Bigaignon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Hogrefe</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. garinii, and B. afzelii western blots (immunoblots)</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</source>
          ,
          <volume>34</volume>
          (
          <year>1996</year>
          )
          <fpage>e1732</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>e1738</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Lager</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Ram</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Wilhelmsson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Nyman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Serological diagnostics of Lyme borreliosis: comparison of assays in twelve clinical laboratories in Northern Europe,</article-title>
          .
          <source>European Journal of Clinical Microbiology &amp; Infectious Diseases</source>
          , volume
          <volume>38</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <fpage>e1933</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>e1945</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Norman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Antig</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Bigaignon, W. Hogrefe,
          <article-title>Serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. garinii, and B. afzelii western blots (immunoblots)</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</source>
          , volume
          <volume>34</volume>
          (
          <year>1996</year>
          )
          <fpage>1732</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1738</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Nimmrich</surname>
          </string-name>
          , I. Becker, G. Horneff,
          <article-title>Intraarticular corticosteroids in refractory childhood Lyme arthritis</article-title>
          .
          <source>Rheumatology International</source>
          ,
          <volume>34</volume>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <fpage>e987</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>e994</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>