<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1613-0073</issn>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>artificial intelligence to improve the work of educational platforms</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Oleh Yasniy</string-name>
          <email>oleh.yasniy@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Andriy Mykytyshyn</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Iryna Didych</string-name>
          <email>iryna.didych1101@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vitalii Kubashok</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Andriy Boiko</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Workshop</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Artificial intelligence</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>ChatGPT, education platform, CREO</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Proceedings ITTAP'2023: 3rd International Workshop on Information Technologies: Theoretical and Applied Problems</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>56, Ruska Street, Ternopil, 46001</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>Ternopil Volobymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>2, Maksima Krivonosa Street, Ternopil, 46000</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>In the modern world of technology, education is constantly adapting, responding to the challenges of the new generation. In particular, learning platforms are becoming a key tool in this process, enabling globalized and interactive learning. The evolution of educational platforms, their impact on education and the possibilities for their further development due to artificial intelligence have been studied. It is shown that it is appropriate to use ChatGPT on the basis of the CREO platform for teaching English. That is, with the support and guidance of an intelligent system for learning English, ChatGPT analyzes the level of learning, the student's weaknesses and makes suggestions for learning. It was investigated that the average score of Group 1 was 7.3 out of 10, while Group 2 showed a result of 9.1 out of 10. Additionally, satisfaction with the course among Group 1 students was 70%, while in Group 2 this figure reached 95%.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Learning platforms are digital environments that allow students and teachers to interact, learn and
communicate online. They may include video lectures, tests, discussion forums and other interactive
elements. In particular, the first learning platforms appeared in the late 1990s and were simple
learning</p>
      <p>
        management systems. With the development of technology, they have become more
functional and interactive. With the advent of broadband Internet and mobile technologies, access to
online education has become wider [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref2">1-2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-1-1">
        <title>It is known that ten years ago the number of people who used online platforms was limited to</title>
        <p>thousands. However, with the development of technology and the increasing availability of the</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-2">
        <title>Internet, this figure has grown to tens of millions. For example, Coursera has over 40 million users.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-3">
        <title>This rapid growth can be explained by the increasing need for flexible learning, the availability of courses from leading universities in the world and the opportunity to study at a convenient time for themselves [3].</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-4">
        <title>The following platforms are the most popular:</title>
        <p>•
•
•
•
•</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-5">
        <title>Coursera: cooperates with the world's leading universities;</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-6">
        <title>Udemy: allows any teacher to create their own course;</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-7">
        <title>EdX: a non-profit organization that offers university courses;</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-8">
        <title>Khan Academy: free platform for students of different age groups;</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-9">
        <title>Moodle: open learning management system for educational institutions;</title>
        <p>2020 Copyright for this paper by its authors.
CEUR</p>
        <p>ceur-ws.org
• Сreo: Ukrainian platform, which combines various mechanics of learning, and also uses a
neural network.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-10">
        <title>Each platform has its own characteristics. For example, Coursera and EdX offer courses from</title>
        <p>world universities, while Udemy allows any teacher to create and market their courses. Khan</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-11">
        <title>Academy is focused on creating free educational materials for students of all ages.</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Predictions about the future of online education</title>
      <p>
        The future of online education promises to be a significant changing factor in the ways we acquire
and exchange knowledge. This evolution of the educational process is determined by two key aspects:
accessibility and interactivity. On the one hand, online education becomes extremely accessible to
everyone, providing the opportunity to study at a convenient time and place for everyone. This is
especially useful for those who have a variable schedule or limited access to traditional educational
institutions. On the other hand, modern online learning platforms offer interactive opportunities that
give learning a new level of interaction. Joint discussion, cooperation on projects and the ability to
immediately receive feedback bring the learning process closer to classical learning in the classroom
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>In addition, the concept of microlearning allows you to assimilate knowledge quickly and efficiently through short, focused lessons and tasks, which facilitates learning and improves the assimilation of material.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>The education of the future will also be more personalized through the use of artificial intelligence</title>
        <p>and data analysis. This will create curricula that take into account the individual needs and level of
knowledge of each student.</p>
        <p>In general, the future of online education opens up new opportunities for learning and
development, making education more accessible, interactive and personalized for everyone. In
general, the future of online education promises to be more dynamic, accessible and aimed at
developing practical skills and competencies. This opens up new opportunities for learning and
selfdevelopment in the modern world.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>2.1. Automation of artificial intelligence to improve the operation of platforms</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>In the context of rapid technological development, educational platforms continue to adapt to modern requirements, actively using the possibilities of automation and artificial intelligence. These innovative technologies can revolutionize the approach to learning, making it more efficient and individual.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>One of the key benefits of automation is the ability to instantly check tasks. Modern algorithms allow you to analyze the answers of students in real time, giving them feedback and helping to assimilate the material faster. This not only facilitates the work of teachers, but also allows students to immediately get an answer to their mistakes.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>In addition, automated systems can study the individual needs of each student. They analyze the current level of knowledge, choosing the most suitable materials for further study. This creates conditions for flexible and focused learning.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>Gamification, or the use of game elements in the learning process, also plays an important role in modern platforms. Students can receive awards, points or medals for completed assignments, which encourages their desire to learn. Interactive tasks in the form of games make learning more exciting and dynamic.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-5">
        <title>As for artificial intelligence, it opens up new horizons for personalizing learning. Analyzing data about the student, his learning style and other characteristics, the system can offer the most suitable materials, tasks and techniques. Also, based on feedback and results, artificial intelligence can adapt the curriculum, making it as effective as possible for each student.</title>
        <p>
          In general, automation and artificial intelligence can greatly improve the quality and efficiency of
online education, making the learning process more individual, flexible and exciting [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref11 ref12 ref5 ref6 ref7 ref8 ref9">5-12</xref>
          ].
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>3. Results and discussions</title>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>In recent years, the educational sector has been actively introducing the latest technologies to</title>
        <p>improve the quality of education. One such technology is artificial intelligence. We decided to explore
how the integration of ChatGPT on the Creo platform can affect the process of learning English.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>Within a month, two groups of students, each numbering 10 people, took an English course. The</title>
        <p>first group (Group 1) studied the language according to the traditional method, without additional
technological tools. The second group (Group 2) received additional support from ChatGPT, which
analyzed their responses, provided feedback and recommended additional materials for study.</p>
        <p>After completing a month of study, we analyzed the results of both groups. In particular, Figures 1
and 2 show students marks of Group 1 and Group 2. The average Group 1 score was 7.3 out of 10,
while Group 2 scored 9.1 out of 10 (Figure 3). These findings suggest that integrating ChatGPT can
significantly improve student academic performance.</p>
        <p>7,5
6,8
7,2
7
8
6,5
7,4
7,1
7,3</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-3">
        <title>Additionally, 60% of students from Group 1 indicated that they had difficulty with certain topics, compared to 20% of students from Group 2. This confirms that ChatGPT helps students better understand the material (Figure 4).</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-4">
        <title>Satisfaction with the course among Group 1 students was 70%, while in Group 2 this figure</title>
        <p>reached 95% (Figure 5). This suggests that the use of artificial intelligence can not only improve the
quality of learning, but also make the learning process more exciting.</p>
        <p>One of the key points was that in Group 1 only 7 out of 10 students reached the end of the course,
while in Group 2 all 10 students successfully completed the course (Figure 6). This emphasizes the
importance of integrating modern technologies into the learning process.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-5">
        <title>In addition, with the help of the two-sample unpaired t-test, the presence of differences between</title>
        <p>the two samples (Group 1 and Group 2) was verified statistically using Student t-test. In particular,
temp= -16.84, while tkr= 2.26 at a significance level of p=0.05. If |temp |&gt; tkr, it can be concluded that the
differences between the results of both groups are significant at p=0.05.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>4. Conclusions</title>
      <p>Education is undergoing a period of rapid change, and digital technologies play a key role in this
process. Learning platforms, enhanced by automation and artificial intelligence, open up new
opportunities for individual and interactive learning. Gamification, as an element of motivation, can
make the learning process not only effective, but also exciting. In the future, we can expect even
greater integration of technologies into the educational process, which will make education more
accessible and better for everyone. It was investigated that the average score of Group 1 was 7.3 out
of 10, while Group 2 showed a result of 9.1 out of 10 with integrating ChatGPT. In particular,
satisfaction with the course among Group 1 students was 70%, while in Group 2 was 95%.</p>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>Additionally, the scores of both groups were tested by t-test, which showed that the difference between the results of groups 1 and 2 is statistically significant.</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>5. References</title>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yuan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Teaching Mode of English Language and Literature Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology in the Context of Big Data, Mobile Information Systems</source>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ):
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>11</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garshasbi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yecies</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Microlearning and computer-supported collaborative learning: An agenda towards a comprehensive online learning system</article-title>
          ,
          <source>STEM Education</source>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ):
          <fpage>225</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>255</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3934/steme.2021016.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Milligan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Littlejohn</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Supporting professional learning in a massive open online course</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning</source>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ):
          <fpage>197</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>213</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .19173/irrodl.v15i5.
          <year>1855</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Anderson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Theories for Learning with Emerging Technologies, In Emergence and Innovation in Digital Learning</article-title>
          . Athabasca University Press (
          <year>2016</year>
          ):
          <fpage>35</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>64</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .15215/aupress/9781771991490.01.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Siemens</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning</source>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Pappano</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The Year of the MOOC</article-title>
          . The New York Times (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Breslow</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pritchard</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>DeBoer</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stump</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ho</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Seaton</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX's first MOOC</article-title>
          , Research &amp; Practice in Assessment (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Jordan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length</article-title>
          and attrition,
          <source>International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning</source>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kop</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hill</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning</source>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Margaryan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bianco</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Littlejohn</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), Computers &amp; Education (</article-title>
          <year>2015</year>
          ):
          <fpage>77</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>83</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Veletsianos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shepherdson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013-2015</article-title>
          , International Review of Research in Open and Distributed
          <string-name>
            <surname>Learning</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zheng</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rosson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shih</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carroll</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Understanding student motivation, behaviors, and perceptions in MOOCs</article-title>
          ,
          <source>In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work &amp; Social Computing</source>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ):
          <fpage>1882</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1895</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>