=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-3633/industry1 |storemode=property |title=Asset information management for a communications network in Ireland |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3633/industry1.pdf |volume=Vol-3633 |authors=Aonghus O’Keeffe,David Torrado |dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/ldac/OKeeffeT23 }} ==Asset information management for a communications network in Ireland== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3633/industry1.pdf
                         Asset Information Management for a Communications Network in
                         Ireland
                         Aonghus O'Keeffe 1 and David Torrado 1
                         1
                                Roughan & O’Donovan Consulting Engineers, Arena House, Arena Road, Dublin, Ireland

                                                              Abstract
                                                              An infrastructure project in Ireland required installation of new power and communications
                                                              cables. Running of these new cables necessitated works for new and existing ducts and
                                                              chambers. Historically, as-built records from such projects would comprise documents in
                                                              unstructured data formats (e.g., PDF, CAD). However, the client, a major public asset owner,
                                                              sought to collate structured asset information that could be used for improving future decision
                                                              making.
                                                              The client did not have an overarching data strategy at the outset of the project. Further, the
                                                              client did not have an asset information management system (AIMS) for duct, chamber and
                                                              cable asset information. As such, the presenters proposed a vendor-neutral, standards-based
                                                              approach to asset information management, with machine-readable rules and instance data
                                                              using LD/SW technologies. This approach was intended to futureproof the data such that it
                                                              could be consumed by any adopted AIMS. Further, demonstration of the approach itself was
                                                              intended to inform the stakeholders of the potential benefits and disbenefits of its adoption
                                                              across other areas of the asset network or other asset types.
                                                              A systematic approach was followed throughout. Clearly defined use cases were elicited from
                                                              end users such as maintainers and operators. A sub-set of these use cases was selected to inform
                                                              information needed for each asset type. Rather than trying to model all ‘nice-to-have’
                                                              information, a minimum viable product approach was taken, retaining focus on the most
                                                              important information and functionality. A top-level ontology was developed, based on a draft
                                                              version of EN 17632-1. A ‘chambers, ducts and cables’ ontology was created. A small set of
                                                              instance data was loaded into a triple store along with the ontologies, and test queries were run
                                                              to ascertain if the agreed use cases were met. This resulted in some refinement of the ontologies
                                                              prior to extending instance data collection to the whole project.
                                                              The ontologies formed the basis for configuration of a proprietary site inspection mobile
                                                              application, used to gather data such as location, duct orientation, and photographs. Asset data
                                                              was supplemented through desktop study of as-built records. The data was then exported in
                                                              JSON format, post-processed using Python, and then converted into RDF. SHACL validation
                                                              was run on the dataset to confirm compliance with the ontologies and with W3C standards
                                                              prior to upload to the triple store. The adopted triple store presented query results in XML,
                                                              tabular, image, or map formats, and facilitated GeoSPARQL. The agreed use cases were
                                                              achieved and demonstrated to the client.
                                                              The work presented various challenges, including: a) limited functionality of popular CAD,
                                                              GIS and AIMS software for reading or writing RDF; b) complexity of managing information
                                                              about below-ground assets; c) multi-step post-processing of collected data; and d)
                                                              communicating the outcomes in the absence of a user-friendly interface for interrogating the
                                                              data. (Development of such an interface was outside the project scope.) However, the
                                                              prospective benefits of a modular, scalable, standards-based, machine-readable approach are
                                                              clear, and they warrant due attention by public asset owners seeking to futureproof their data
                                                              and systems.

                                                              Keywords 1
                                                              Knowledge graphs, Rule/compliance checking, Smart Cities and Geospatial, Use Case


                         Proceedings LDAC2023 – 11th Linked Data in Architecture and Construction, June 15–16, 2023, Matera, Italy
                         EMAIL: aonghus.okeeffe@rod.ie (A. O’Keeffe); david.torrado@rod.ie (D. Torrado)
                                                           © 2023 Copyright for this paper by its authors.
                                                           Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
                                CEUR
                                Wor
                                Pr
                                   ks
                                    hop
                                 oceedi
                                      ngs
                                            ht
                                            I
                                             tp:
                                               //
                                                ceur
                                                   -
                                            SSN1613-
                                                    ws
                                                     .or
                                                   0073
                                                       g

                                                           CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)


CEUR
                  ceur-ws.org
Workshop      ISSN 1613-0073
Proceedings

                                                                                                                              238