<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Competencies Model for the Socialization of Artificial Intelligence Systems</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Sergey Bushuyev</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Natalia Bushuyeva</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Victoria Bushuieva</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Denis Bushuiev</string-name>
          <email>bushuievd@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Andrii Ivko</string-name>
          <email>andrii.ivko.science@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Povitroflotsky Av, 31, Kyiv</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are becoming integral parts of our daily lives, influencing how we work, interact, and make decisions. As AI systems continue to advance, it is crucial to ensure that they are not only technically proficient but also socially aware and responsible. This paper proposes a Competencies Model for the Socialization of Artificial Intelligence Systems, which aims to define and cultivate the skills and attributes necessary for AI systems to operate ethically, effectively, and harmoniously in human-centric environments. The Competencies Model is based on a multidisciplinary approach, drawing from AI ethics, machine learning, human-computer interaction, and behavioral psychology. It outlines a framework for developing AI systems with competencies in the following key areas. The paper provides a detailed discussion of each competency area, offering practical strategies and techniques for their development and evaluation. It emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration between AI researchers, ethicists, psychologists, and designers to create AI systems that align with human values and societal needs. By implementing the Competencies Model for the Socialization of Artificial Intelligence Systems, we aim to advance the development of AI systems that not only excel in technical capabilities but also contribute to a more socially responsible, user-friendly, and ethical AI landscape. This model serves as a guide for researchers, developers, and policymakers in fostering the responsible integration of AI into our societies. Competencies, socialization, artificial intelligence, conceptual model</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies is reshaping the way we live,
work, and interact with the world around us. AI systems are increasingly becoming integral to
our daily lives, from virtual personal assistants and recommendation engines to autonomous
vehicles and healthcare diagnostics. However, as AI systems become more prevalent and complex,
there is a growing imperative to ensure their responsible and effective integration into human
society. This integration involves not only technical proficiency but also a deeper understanding
of the competencies required for AI systems to interact harmoniously within our social and ethical
frameworks [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        This paper introduces a Competencies Model that serves as a structured framework for the
socialization of AI systems [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3">2, 3</xref>
        ]. It is a comprehensive guide designed to facilitate the responsible
and beneficial integration of AI into various domains and industries [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. The model covers
multiple dimensions of AI competencies, encompassing technical intelligence, business
intelligence, emotion intelligence, social intelligence, cognitive intelligence, fluid intelligence, and
crystallized intelligence. The central thesis of this paper is that the socialization of AI systems
necessitates competencies that go beyond technical expertise. These competencies include an
understanding of ethical considerations, the ability to adapt to evolving social dynamics, and the
      </p>
      <p>0000-0002-7815-8129 (S. Bushuyev); 0000-0002-4969-7879 (N. Bushuyeva); 0000-0001-7298-4369
(V. Bushuieva); 0000-0001-5340-5165 (D. Bushuiev); 0000-0002-4075-5112 (A. Ivko)
️© 2023 Copyright for this paper by its authors.</p>
      <p>Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).</p>
      <p>
        CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)
capacity to process information and make decisions that align with human values [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5 ref6">5, 6</xref>
        ]. The
Competencies Model outlined in this paper aims to bridge the gap between AI's technical
capabilities and its responsible integration into society. In the following sections, we will explore
the dimensions of the Competencies Model and provide insights into the following key aspects:
Technical Intelligence Competencies. This dimension focuses on the technical expertise required
to create, manage, and maintain AI systems. Proficiency in programming, machine learning, and
algorithmic knowledge is fundamental to the development of AI [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Business Intelligence Competencies. As AI increasingly becomes a part of various industries, it
must align with business objectives, market dynamics, and financial considerations.
Competencies in this area address the effective integration of AI into organizational strategies.</p>
      <p>Emotion Intelligence Competencies. Human-AI interactions are becoming more emotional and
personalized. This dimension encompasses AI's ability to understand, interpret, and respond to
human emotions, leading to more meaningful and ethical AI interactions.</p>
      <p>
        Social Intelligence Competencies: AI's impact extends to complex social dynamics, including
issues of bias, fairness, diversity, and ethical considerations. Competencies in social intelligence
address AI's integration into societal values and norms [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Cognitive Intelligence Competencies. AI systems must be capable of processing information,
making decisions, and adapting to changing circumstances. Competence in cognitive intelligence
ensures responsible and adaptive AI behavior.</p>
      <p>Fluid Intelligence Competencies. Adaptability, problem-solving, and creativity are essential for
AI to navigate complex and evolving environments. These competencies enable AI to contribute
effectively to diverse domains.</p>
      <p>
        Crystallized Intelligence Competencies. Accumulating and applying knowledge is crucial for AI
systems. Competencies in crystallized intelligence ensure that AI can access relevant information
and provide valuable insights [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The Competencies Model introduced in this paper acknowledges the ethical considerations of
AI integration, including transparency, accountability, and the protection of human rights. It
provides a holistic approach to guiding the development, deployment, and interaction of AI
systems, fostering responsible and ethical integration into human society [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        As AI continues to evolve and expand its role in our lives, understanding and cultivating the
competencies outlined in this model is vital to ensure that AI systems are not only technically
proficient but also responsible, ethical, and harmonious in their interactions with humans and
society [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11 ref12">11, 12</xref>
        ]. This model serves as a foundational guide for individuals, organizations, and
policymakers navigating the complex landscape of AI socialization [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13, 14</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Conceptual model for the Socialization of Artificial Intelligence</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Systems</title>
      <p>Developing a conceptual framework for the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) systems into
society involves delineating the fundamental elements and connections that contribute to the
responsible and advantageous assimilation of AI into human life. This framework serves as a
toplevel structure for comprehending the diverse facets of AI socialization. Presented below is a
conceptual framework for the socialization of AI systems.</p>
      <p>Technical Proficiency</p>
      <p>Found at the core of the model is the technical proficiency indispensable for creating,
upkeeping, and overseeing AI systems. This encompasses expertise in machine learning, data
science, programming, and algorithmic knowledge.</p>
      <p>Ethical Guidance</p>
      <p>Encompassing the technical core is an ethical framework that directs the conduct and
decisionmaking of AI systems. This comprises principles of transparency, fairness, accountability, and
respect for human rights.</p>
      <p>Human-AI Interaction</p>
      <p>The interaction layer signifies the connection point between AI systems and humans. It
involves natural language processing, speech recognition, and user experience design to facilitate
smooth and meaningful interactions.</p>
      <p>Emotion Awareness</p>
      <p>Understanding and Responding to Emotions. AI systems should exhibit emotional intelligence
in perceiving, comprehending, and appropriately responding to human emotions. This is vital for
personalized and empathetic interactions.</p>
      <p>Social Intelligence</p>
      <p>Alignment with Social Norms. Social intelligence entails AI systems comprehending and
adhering to societal norms, values, and ethical standards, addressing issues of bias,
discrimination, and cultural sensitivity.</p>
      <p>Cognitive Intelligence</p>
      <p>Information Processing and Decision-Making. Cognitive intelligence empowers AI systems to
process extensive data, make informed decisions, and adapt to changing circumstances while
aligning with human values and goals.</p>
      <p>Business Intelligence</p>
      <p>Alignment with Organizational Goals. Business intelligence pertains to the ability of AI systems
to comprehend organizational objectives, market dynamics, and financial considerations,
ensuring AI aligns with and contributes to business strategies.</p>
      <p>Resource Management</p>
      <p>Optimizing Resource Usage. Effective resource allocation is crucial for efficient AI socialization,
involving the optimization of energy, computing resources, and infrastructure usage while
minimizing environmental impact [15].</p>
      <p>Adaptability Layer</p>
      <p>Adaptation to Changing Environments. Encircling the core components is an adaptability layer.
AI systems must be adaptable to evolving technology, regulatory changes, and shifting user needs.</p>
      <p>Continuous Improvement Loop</p>
      <p>Learning and Continuous Enhancement. The continuous improvement loop represents the
mechanism through which AI systems learn from interactions, adapt, and continually improve,
fostering responsiveness to user feedback and evolving societal norms.</p>
      <p>Transparency and Accountability</p>
      <p>Openness and Responsibility. The model incorporates mechanisms for transparency and
accountability, involving transparently communicating AI systems' capabilities and limitations,
along with holding developers and users responsible for AI actions.</p>
      <p>Data Governance</p>
      <p>Responsible Data Management. Data governance ensures the ethical collection, storage, and
usage of data to safeguard user privacy and adhere to data protection regulations.</p>
      <p>Education and Awareness</p>
      <p>User and Developer Training. Fostering education and awareness is critical for both users and
AI developers. This encompasses educating users on responsible AI interaction and training
developers in ethical AI design [16].</p>
      <p>Regulatory Environment</p>
      <p>Legal and Ethical Framework. The model acknowledges the role of government and regulatory
bodies in establishing legal and ethical guidelines for AI systems' behavior [17].</p>
      <p>Security and Privacy</p>
      <p>Safeguarding Data and Systems. Security and privacy measures are essential for protecting AI
systems and the data they manage from cybersecurity threats and breaches.</p>
      <p>Sustainability and Environmental Impact</p>
      <p>Minimizing Ecological Footprint: The model integrates considerations for AI's environmental
impact, emphasizing sustainability and eco-friendly practices.</p>
      <p>This conceptual framework for the socialization of AI systems accentuates the multi-faceted
nature of AI integration into human society [18]. It underscores the significance of technical
competence, ethical principles, human-AI interaction, and adaptability. The model offers a
highlevel synopsis of the elements and connections necessary for the responsible and beneficial
deployment of AI systems, emphasizing their alignment with human values, ethics, and societal
norms [19].</p>
      <p>Let's look at transition priority on the way to AI socialization (Table 1).
1 Technical Proficiency
2 Ethical Guidance
3 Human-AI Interaction
4 Emotion Awareness
5 Social Intelligence
6 Cognitive Intelligence
7 Business Intelligence
8 Resource Management
9 Adaptability Layer
10 Continuous Improvement Loop
11 Transparency and Accountability
12 Data Governance
13 Education and Awareness
14 Regulatory Environment
15 Security and Privacy
16 Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Source: Authors</p>
      <p>This assessment was done by a group of 18 independent experts with the application of
creative technology. According to the task, experts assess the time scale from 2000 until 2023.
They define big changes in qualified assessment according to priority.</p>
      <p>Competencies socialization in the AI age refers to the process of aligning and unifying core
competencies across individuals, organizations, and societies in the context of the AI era. In a
rapidly changing and interconnected world, it's important to ensure that fundamental
competencies, such as ethics, privacy, security, and inclusivity, are shared and upheld. This
socialization can be a complex challenge, as digital technologies have the power to both enable
and disrupt traditional competencies systems [20, 21].</p>
      <p>Let's look at some key points related to competencies socialization in the AI age.</p>
      <p>Ethical Consideration. The digital age has introduced new ethical dilemmas, such as privacy
concerns, algorithmic bias, and data security. Harmonizing ethical values involves developing and
adhering to ethical guidelines and standards in the use of digital technologies.</p>
      <p>Global Collaboration. With the internet connecting people worldwide, there is a need for global
collaboration to harmonize values. International agreements and standards can help ensure that
core values are respected and upheld across borders.</p>
      <p>Cultural Diversity. Different cultures have unique values and norms. Harmonizing values in the
digital age should respect and embrace cultural diversity while finding common ground on
fundamental principles.</p>
      <p>Inclusivity and Accessibility. Ensuring that digital technologies are accessible to all and do not
discriminate is a crucial aspect of value harmonization. This includes making digital resources
available to marginalized communities.</p>
      <p>Cybersecurity. As more aspects of our lives move online, cybersecurity becomes a fundamental
value. Harmonizing values in this context involves protecting digital systems from threats and
ensuring the integrity of data.</p>
      <p>Education and Awareness. Promoting digital literacy and awareness of the ethical and societal
implications of digital technologies is essential for value harmonization.</p>
      <p>Government and Industry Responsibility. Governments and businesses have a role to play in
harmonizing values. Regulations, corporate social responsibility, and transparency are all
essential in this regard.</p>
      <p>Balancing Innovation and Responsibility. Balancing the drive for technological innovation with
the responsibility to uphold core values is a key challenge in the digital age.</p>
      <p>Value harmonization in the digital age is an ongoing process that involves multiple
stakeholders and requires continuous adaptation as technology evolves. It's about finding
common ground and shared values while respecting the diversity and complexity of the digital
landscape.</p>
      <p>The impact of key drivers of harmonization is presented in Table 2.</p>
      <p>These results were developed by a group of 14 independent experts and define the qualitative
level of influence key driver of harmonization on future values.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>3. Competencies Socialization Model in the AI era</title>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>3.1. Individual competencies for socialization AI</title>
        <p>The digital era has revolutionized the way individuals access information, communicate, and
interact with the world. It has opened up numerous opportunities for value creation at the
individual level. Ways in which AI socialization creates value for individuals are presented in
Table 3. For setting up the priority of individual competencies, used the Ukrainian case Autumn
2023 year.
3 Remote Work. The ability to work remotely allows individuals to enjoy flexibility Very high
in their work schedules, reduce commuting time and expenses, and achieve a
better work-life balance.
4 Entrepreneurship. Digital tools and platforms have made it easier for individuals High
to start and grow their businesses, whether as freelancers, e-commerce
entrepreneurs, or content creators.
5 Access to Healthcare. Telemedicine and health apps offer individuals greater High
access to medical consultations, healthcare information, and personalized
wellness plans.
6 Online Shopping. E-commerce platforms provide convenience and a wide range Low
of products at individuals' fingertips, often with personalized
recommendations.
7 Social Connections. Social media and messaging apps enable individuals to High
connect with friends, family, and communities, even when geographically
distant.
8 Personal Finance Management. Digital banking, budgeting apps, and Low
investment platforms help individuals manage their finances more effectively
and make informed financial decisions.
9 Entertainment and Content. Streaming services, gaming, and digital media Low
platforms offer endless entertainment options, including movies, music, books,
and video games.
10 Travel and Exploration. Digital tools and apps help individuals plan trips, book Low
accommodations, and access travel information, allowing for more
adventurous and well-informed travel experiences.
11 Fitness and Health Tracking. Wearable devices and fitness apps assist Low
individuals in tracking physical activity, monitoring health metrics, and
achieving their fitness goals.
12 Privacy and Security. Digital technologies empower individuals to secure their High
personal information and online presence through encryption, two-factor
authentication, and cybersecurity tools.
13 Environmental Awareness. Digital tools and platforms provide information and High
resources for individuals to make eco-friendly choices and reduce their
environmental footprint.
14 Productivity and Time Management. Productivity apps and tools help High
individuals better organize their tasks, schedules, and goals.
15 Crisis Response and Safety. Digital communication can be critical for individuals Very high
during emergencies, providing access to emergency services, real-time
information, and location-based alerts.
16 Mental Health and Well-being. Digital mental health apps and resources offer High
support, self-help strategies, and stress management techniques to promote
well-being.
17 Personal Branding and Networking. Online presence and social networking can Low
help individuals build personal brands, connect with like-minded professionals,
and explore career opportunities.
18 Accessibility and Inclusion. Digital innovations have improved accessibility for Low
individuals with disabilities, facilitating greater participation in society.
19 E-Government Services. Access to government services online, including tax High
filing and official documents, simplifies bureaucratic processes and saves time.
20 Hobbies and Creativity. Digital tools and communities provide platforms for Low
individuals to explore hobbies, share their creativity, and collaborate with
others.</p>
        <p>AI socialization has transformed various aspects of daily life, offering convenience,
personalization, and opportunities for individuals to achieve their personal and professional
goals. Individuals need to embrace digital literacy and responsible digital practices to maximize
the benefits of the digital era while safeguarding their privacy and security.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>3.2. Organizational or business competencies for value creation</title>
        <p>In the digital era, organizations and businesses need to develop specific competencies to create
value and remain competitive in the rapidly evolving business landscape. The key competencies
for value creation in the digital era are presented in Table 4. For setting up the priority of
organizational and business competencies, used the Ukrainian case Autumn 2023 year.
14 Continuous Learning. Competency in continuous learning and adaptation is Low
essential to keep up with evolving technologies and market dynamics.
15 Sustainability and Social Responsibility. Addressing environmental and social issues High
is becoming increasingly important. Organizations that incorporate sustainability
into their business strategies can create value and enhance their brand reputation.</p>
        <p>These competencies are not exhaustive, and the specific competencies required may vary
depending on the industry, organization, and the nature of its digital initiatives. However,
developing these competencies can help organizations thrive in the digital era and create
sustained value for their stakeholders.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-3">
        <title>3.3. Society competencies for AI socialization</title>
        <p>In the AI socialization era, creating value for society has taken on new dimensions, driven by
technology and innovation. Digital advancements have the potential to address various societal
challenges and improve the well-being of communities. Ways in which value can be created for
society in the digital era are presented in Table 5. For setting up the priority of individual
competencies, used the Ukrainian case Autumn 2023 year.
analytics, and IoT (Internet of Things) technologies to monitor and address
environmental issues, such as air quality, water conservation, and waste
management.
11 Crisis Response and Disaster Management. Using digital tools and platforms for Very high
effective disaster response, including early warning systems, real-time
information sharing, and coordination of emergency services.
12 Remote Work and Flexible Employment. Offering remote work opportunities, gig High
economy jobs, and freelance work, can provide individuals with greater work
flexibility and income opportunities.
13 Innovative Healthcare Technologies. Incorporating digital health solutions like Low
wearable devices, AI-based diagnostics, and telemedicine to improve healthcare
accessibility, efficiency, and patient outcomes.
14 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Implementing digital technologies to Low
optimize energy consumption, integrate renewable energy sources, and reduce
greenhouse gas emissions.
15 Online Civic Engagement. Encouraging citizen participation in decision-making Low
processes through digital platforms, promoting democracy and accountability.</p>
        <p>Creating value for society in the AI socialization era is a multifaceted endeavour that requires
collaboration among governments, businesses, non-profit organizations, and individuals. The
responsible and ethical use of technology plays a crucial role in harnessing digital advancements
for the betterment of society.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-4">
        <title>3.4. Competencies AI Socialization model</title>
        <p>In the AI socialization era, achieving Competency harmonization for AI-generated products
across all key aspects is paramount. Business priorities have shifted, and the commercial
Competencies of new technology-based products are no longer the sole criterion for
decisionmaking. If specific aspects of these products' Competencies are questionable and fail to meet
contemporary standards, it becomes essential to refine the products to ensure Competency
harmonization.</p>
        <p>Consequently, the challenge of assessing multidimensional Competencies in the digital era
emerges as the initial step in determining the acceptability of new technology-based products.
Figure 1 illustrates the concept of assessing AI product Competencies within the context of
harmonization processes.</p>
        <p>The multidimensionality of Competencies entails numerous assessment points, with the
primary ones for AI products being society, individual, and business (see Figure 1). For each of
these identified assessment points, several detailed aspects form, reflecting the intricacies of the
requirements and interests of society, individuals, and businesses.</p>
        <p>Naturally, not all the established and acknowledged evaluation criteria hold equal significance,
necessitating the creation of a prioritization system. Any assessment lacks meaning without the
establishment of acceptable thresholds. Therefore, it's imperative to define acceptable thresholds
for each dimension of Competencies. When the individual components of Competencies fall below
these acceptable thresholds, adjustments are necessary for the AI product to ensure Competency
harmonization in that context. Only when all Competencies components surpass the established
minimum thresholds can the product be introduced to the market. It's important to note that
determining these minimum acceptable levels is a complex undertaking that warrants dedicated
research.</p>
        <p>For evaluating Competencies in the AI socialization era, the following formula is proposed:
where
is common Competencies,
is priority of assessment direction - point of view on the product,</p>
        <p>is priority of the Competencies aspect for each assessment area;
is number of Competencies aspects for each direction;</p>
        <p>According to the generally accepted approach for priorities (weights), the following conditions
must be met:</p>
        <p>is the evaluation of a product's Competencies concerning each aspect of
Competencies is typically carried out by experts, which can yield a rather subjective perspective
influenced by the specific traits of these experts. Alternatively, a more rational approach involves
assessment by artificial intelligence, which requires a foundation for comparison and reference,
typically in the form of a collection of judgments representing modern society's stance on various
aspects of digital technologies and AI products.</p>
        <p>Considering the three facets of Competency assessment – Individual, societal, and business –
it's not just the ultimate Competency assessment that is the primary focus, but rather the three
constituent components:</p>
        <p>Thus, the Competencies of the AI product is assessed by taking into account each aspect and
its priority, which forms three final assessments (Fig. 2).
,</p>
        <p>,
(1)
(2)
(3)</p>
        <p>Note that the final assessment of Competencies V can be used when making decisions, for
example, on the selection of appropriate projects for implementation from a variety of
alternatives, and are used as restrictions</p>
        <p>, taking into account the establishment of their
minimum acceptable Competencies .</p>
        <p>It's important to observe that the suggested method, in which AI conducts Competency
assessments, presents a dual aspect. On one hand, artificial intelligence assesses the
Competencies of new AI products. On the other hand, the capabilities of AI provide a foundation
for a thorough comparison in every Competency aspect, ensuring the utmost impartiality during
evaluations (see Figure 3). This approach serves to mitigate the "commercial" aspect of human
judgment and the potential subjectivity of experts.</p>
        <p>As the development and complexity of artificial intelligence technologies rise, so does the
development and complexity of the associated products. This also brings about an increase in the
responsibilities of artificial intelligence within the contexts mentioned. By advancing AI with a
focus on meeting the responsibilities towards individuals, society, and businesses, we can ensure
that AI's competencies align harmoniously with the needs of humanity.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Conclusion and recommendation</title>
      <p>The socialization of artificial intelligence (AI) systems is a complex and challenging task. However,
we must develop AI systems that can interact with humans in a safe, ethical, and responsible
manner. A competencies model for the socialization of AI systems can provide a framework for
developing and evaluating AI systems that are ready to be integrated into society. This model
should include technical, social, and ethical competencies. Technical competencies are essential
for AI systems to be able to understand and respond to human language and behavior. AI systems
also need to be able to learn and adapt to new information and situations. Social competencies
are necessary for AI systems to understand and respect human values and norms. AI systems
should also be able to avoid discrimination and bias and resolve conflict peacefully and
constructively. Ethical competencies are essential for AI systems to be able to discern right from
wrong and make decisions that are consistent with human values. AI systems should also be able
to protect human privacy and security and avoid causing harm to humans. By developing AI
systems that have the necessary competencies, we can ensure that they are socialized in a way
that benefits both humans and machines.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Acknowledgement</title>
      <p>The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the German Academy of Sciences
for the invaluable support provided to the VIMACS project. Additionally, they would like to
express their gratitude to the European Union ERASMUS + program for the generous financial
and technical assistance extended to the WORK4CE project.
[14] R. J. Sternberg, The concept of intelligence, Cambridge Handbook of intelligence. (2nd ed.), New</p>
      <p>York: Cambridge University Press. 2020, Vol. 1, pp. 3-17
[15] J. R. Flynn, &amp; R. J. Sternberg, Environmental effects on intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),
Human intelligence: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2020. pp.
253278
[16] D. F. Halpern, &amp; R. J. Sternberg, An introduction to critical thinking: It will change your life. In
R. J. Sternberg &amp; D. F. Halpern (Eds.), Critical thinking in psychology. (2nd ed.) New York:
Cambridge University Press. 2020. pp. 1-9
[17] N. Cope, Intelligence-led Policing or Policing-Led Intelligence? Integrating Volume Crime</p>
      <p>Analysis into Policing. British Journal of Criminology 2004, #44, 2 pp. 188-203
[18] R. J. Boncella, “Competitive intelligence and the web”, Communications of Association of</p>
      <p>Information Systems, Volume 12. 2003, pp. 327-340
[19] A. Voitushenko, S. Bushuyev, Development of Project Managers’ Creative Potential:
Determination of Components and Results of Research. Advances in Intelligent Systems and
Computing IV. CSIT 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1080. Springer,
Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33695-0_20
[20] A. Bondar, S. Bushuyev, S. Onishchenko, H. Tanaka, Entropy paradigm of project-oriented
organizations management (2020) CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2565, pp. 233-243.
[21] S. Bushuyev, N. Bushuyeva, V. Bushuieva, D. Bushuiev, L. Tereikovska, Dynamic Principles of
Integrated Intelligence Model for Managing Innovation Projects. Proceedings of the 4th
International Workshop IT Project Management (ITPM 2023).</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[1] Toward a Global Approach to Data in the Digital Age</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Monetary Fund</source>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          ,
          <year>43p</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Negnevitsky</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Artificial
          <string-name>
            <surname>Intelligence</surname>
          </string-name>
          (3rd ed.). Pearson. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/810932/artificial-intelligence
          <article-title>-a-guide-to-intelligent-</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>systemspdf</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          ,
          <year>504p</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Poole</surname>
          </string-name>
          , &amp; A.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mackworth</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Artificial Intelligence (2nd ed.)</source>
          . Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/1693704/artificial-intelligence
          <article-title>-foundations-ofcomputational-agents-</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>pdf</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          ,
          <year>802p</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Nick</given-names>
            <surname>Bostrom</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press,
          <year>2016</year>
          ,
          <year>352p</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Christian</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>The Alignment Problem: Machine Learning and Human Values</source>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          ,
          <year>496p</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Russell</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>The Alignment Problem: Machine Learning and Human Values</source>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Tegmark</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Life
          <volume>3</volume>
          .0:
          <string-name>
            <surname>Being</surname>
            <given-names>Human</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <source>in the Age of Artificial Intelligence</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Russell</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Norvig</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach</source>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Wooldridge</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Responsible</surname>
            <given-names>AI</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>A Framework for Understanding and Managing Ethical Issues, 2023</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>IPMA</given-names>
            <surname>Organisational Competence</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Baseline (IPMA OCB)</article-title>
          .
          <source>IPMA</source>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          . 67p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>[11] The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence</source>
          , Cambridge University Press,
          <year>2020</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>58</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>82</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977244.005
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <article-title>A Guidebook of Program &amp; Project Management for Enterprise Innovation, (3rd ed.) P2M, Project Management Association of Japan (PMAJ</article-title>
          ),
          <year>2017</year>
          , 427 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <article-title>A Guide to the Project Management of the Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)</article-title>
          .
          <source>(7th ed.) PMI</source>
          <year>2021</year>
          ,
          <volume>370</volume>
          p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>