<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Marrying Asset- and Deficit-Based Approaches: A Data Feminist Perspective in Learning Analytics</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Angela Stewart</string-name>
          <email>angelas@pitt.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Caitlin Mills</string-name>
          <email>cmills@umn.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Stephen Hutt</string-name>
          <email>stephen.hutt@du.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University of Pittsburgh</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Pittsburgh, PA</addr-line>
          ,
          <institution>USA University of Minnesota</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Minneapolis, MN</addr-line>
          ,
          <institution>USA University Denver</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Denver, CO</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>This workshop explores how learning analytics can reconcile deficit- and asset-based approaches. Deficit-based models focus on identifying and remedying learner shortcomings in order to move them towards a specific learning standard. However, this approach may neglect learners' existing strengths. An asset-based approach may support this, where learners' identities, values, and existing knowledge are considered as assets to their learning. In this workshop, we advocate for a combination of both. We ground our discussion in the data feminism framework, which examines power structures in data design and interpretation. We will delve into three core data feminism principles: examine power, challenge power, and rethink binaries and hierarchies, to construct narratives affirming students' diverse identities.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        Our work is informed by the data feminism framework, which takes an intersectional approach to
defining the power structures involved in designing, collecting, and interpreting data [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. Data
feminism is built on the idea that data is not neutral, and encodes elements of our identity and cultural
experiences, and power within society. Particularly relevant for our context, this framework highlights
the ways data can be used to construct narratives that challenge both power structures and our
understanding of people. Thus we see data feminism as being an appropriate theoretical frame for
constructing asset- and deficit-based narratives that ultimately lead to actionable outcomes that better
benefit students and recognize identity and cultural background as assets to their learning. In our
workshop, we will focus on three of the seven core tenets of data feminism, described below:
      </p>
      <p>
        Examine Power. Power refers to structural privileges or oppressions different groups experience
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. For example, in STEM education, women, girls, and non-binary learners are often marginalized
due to oppressive narratives about their ability to persist in STEM fields, as well as lack of
identity-affirming spaces [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. This marginalization is a product of patriarchy. The first principle of
data feminism is that we must examine how power operates in our world. For learning analytics, this
means we examine how power exists in learning spaces, to produce different experiences and
outcomes based on identity. Additionally, this means we must examine how power informs our
collection, analysis, and communication of data.
      </p>
      <p>
        Challenge Power. Asset- and deficit-based data narratives can challenge unequal power structures
by communicating understandings of data that are grounded in the lived experiences of learners. In
learning analytics, this means we can use data to showcase the ways learner identities are
marginalized in the learning space, and their social reality. For example, the work of Stewart et al.
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ] uses multimodal behavioral metrics to find that girls’ in a computing camp did not verbally
engage in large conversations with the instructors – a deficit narrative that focuses on what the girls’
did not do compared to dominant standards. However, this was married with the asset-based
perspective that girls’ did engage in conversations with each other in small group, student-centered
activities. These analytics can challenge the traditional classroom power structures that center
teachers, and support student-led learning activities.
      </p>
      <p>
        Rethink Binaries and Hierarchies. Binaries and hierarchies are necessary to collecting and
analyzing data. This is because data will always simplify the complexity of each learners’ lived
experience and the learning environment. However, as we construct asset-based narratives of learners,
we must consider the ways in which binaries and hierarchies inadequately characterize a learners’
knowledge and experiences. Further, we can reconsider how binaries and hierarchies uphold systems
of oppression, for example by aligning with dominant views of how learners are expected to behave in
a learning environment. For example, categorizing “good” engagement as speaking out loud in class
ignores the ways learners might be processing information non-verbally [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ]. By using a data
feminism framework, we consider how to marry asset- and deficit-based perspectives..
2. Workshop Speakers
      </p>
      <p>Dr. Angela Stewart is an Assistant Professor in the University of Pittsburgh School of Computing
and Information and Research Scientist at the Learning Research and Development Center. Angela
conducts research at the intersection of the learning sciences, artificial intelligence, and
human-computer interaction. She uses multimodal data to understand students' social and cognitive
states, particularly in collaborative STEM learning. She also creates equitable educational spaces by
designing technologies that support the agency of students and teachers. Angela applies a
culturally-responsive lens to her research, with a particular focus in emboldening Black girls' design
of transformative technologies. Angela was named a 2021 - 2022 Emerging Scholar by the
International Society of the Learning Sciences, and recently received an NSF Racial Equity in STEM
Award for creating an intersectional AI learning ecosystem for Black girls.</p>
      <p>Dr. Caitlin Mills joined the Educational Psychology Department at the University of Minnesota as
an Assistant Professor in 2022, after spending four years in the Psychology Department at the
University of New Hampshire. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame in
Cognitive Psychology (2016), then spent two years as a postdoctoral fellow at the University of
British Columbia (2016-2018) focusing on Cognitive Neuroscience. She is interested in the
intersection of cognitive psychology, computer science, and education. Most of her work has focused
on mind wandering and engagement- including their relationship to affect, creativity, and learning.</p>
      <p>Dr. Stephen Hutt is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science at the University of Denver. His
research activities focus at the intersection of Computer Science, Cognitive Science and Learning
Science, considering how Artificial Intelligence can be used to support learning and learning
technologies. He takes a human-centered computing approach to his work, placing the needs of users
as the focal point for research. He is also interested in how AI and learning technology may serve as a
force for equity within education and ways in which AI advances may help (or hinder) that goal.</p>
      <p>Dr. Alyssa Wise, PhD is Professor of Technology and Education and Director of LIVE,
Vanderbilt’s Learning Innovation Incubator. Her research focuses on supporting data-informed
decision-making in-situ, with attention to actionability, equity and impact, including mixed-method
investigations of how learning practices are being reshaped by new sources of data and the growing
availability of new artificial intelligence capabilities.</p>
      <p>Fanjie Li is a Ph.D. student at Vanderbilt’s Peabody College and a doctoral researcher with the
LIVE Initiative. With a focus on the socio-technical design of learning analytics (eco)systems, her
research draws on human-centered design to explore approaches to LA innovation that are not only
informed by technical possibilities but also attuned to the human contexts the tool intends to serve and
the humanistic aspects of learning.</p>
      <p>Dr. Ryan Baker is a Professor in the Graduate School of Education at the University of
Pennsylvania. Dr. Baker researches how students use and learn from educational games, intelligent
tutors, and other educational software. Drawing on the fields of learning analytics and learning
engineering, he develops methods for mining the data that come out of the interactions between
students and educational software. He then uses this information to improve our understanding of how
students respond to educational software, and how these responses influence their learning. Prior to
joining Penn GSE, Dr. Baker was an associate professor in the Department of Human Development at
Teachers College, Columbia University. He has been teaching the “Big Data and Education” MOOC
for over a decade, with a total enrollment of more than 100,000 students. He has served as founding
president of the International Educational Data Mining Society, where he currently serves on the
board of directors. He has been co-author on over a dozen award-winning papers and received the
Educational Research Award from the Council of Scientific Society Presidents.
3. References</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Smit</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Towards a clearer understanding of student disadvantage in higher education: Problematising deficit thinking</article-title>
          .
          <source>Higher Education Research &amp; Development</source>
          ,
          <volume>31</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>369</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>380</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Museus</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <article-title>What is deficit thinking? An analysis of conceptualizations of deficit thinking and implications for scholarly research</article-title>
          .
          <source>NCID Currents</source>
          ,
          <volume>1</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Silverman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Cultural Deficit Perspective</article-title>
          . In: Goldstein,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Naglieri</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>J.A</surname>
          </string-name>
          . (eds) Encyclopedia
          <source>of Child Behavior and Development</source>
          . Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-
          <fpage>387</fpage>
          -79061-9_
          <fpage>750</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Moll</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (Ed.). (
          <year>1992</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology</article-title>
          . Cambridge University Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Esteban-Guitart</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Moll</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Funds of identity: A new concept based on the funds of knowledge approach</article-title>
          .
          <source>Culture &amp; Psychology</source>
          ,
          <volume>20</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>31</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>48</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Verdín</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Smith</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lucena</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Funds of knowledge as pre-college experiences that promote minoritized students' interest, self-efficacy beliefs, and choice of majoring in engineering</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER)</source>
          ,
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
            <surname>'ignazio</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            , &amp;
            <surname>Klein</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>L. F.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Data feminism</article-title>
          . MIT press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8] Collins,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Patricia</given-names>
            <surname>Hill</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment</article-title>
          . New York: Routledge,
          <year>2002</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Scott</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sheridan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Clark</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Culturally responsive computing: A theory revisited</article-title>
          .
          <source>Learning, Media and Technology</source>
          ,
          <volume>40</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>412</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>436</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stewart</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. E. B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Solyst</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Buddemeyer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hatley</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Henderson-Singer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Scott</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Walker</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ogan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Explaining Engagement: Learner Behaviors in a Virtual Coding Camp</article-title>
          . In I. Roll,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>McNamara</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Sosnovsky</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Luckin</surname>
          </string-name>
          , &amp; V.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dimitrova</surname>
          </string-name>
          (Eds.),
          <source>Artificial Intelligence in Education</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>338</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>343</lpage>
          ). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
          <fpage>030</fpage>
          -78270-2_
          <fpage>60</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>