<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-030-30429-4_16</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>How Scenario Building supports Conceptual Modelling</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Anna Sumereder</string-name>
          <email>anna.sumereder@boc-group.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Damiano Falcioni</string-name>
          <email>damiano.falcioni@boc-group.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Robert Woitsch</string-name>
          <email>robert.woitsch@boc-group.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>BOC Group</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Operngasse 20b, 1040, Vienna</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="AT">Austria</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>3045</volume>
      <fpage>234</fpage>
      <lpage>248</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>A trend on digitization, digitalization, and digital transformation associated with several challenges and complexity can be observed. In this context, the usage of conceptual modelling, particularly business process modelling, is a widely established approach to structure complex activities. However, innovative approaches are required to tackle its liaison with digital technologies. In this paper, after an analysis of the state of the art for business process management approaches and related digital technology aspects, an interactive process modelbased approach - the so called “Scenario Scanner” - is proposed and applied in the context of the EU project Change2Twin. Finally, insights on future research consider conceptual modelling in an era of digital transformation.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Interactive model-based Approach</kwd>
        <kwd>OMiLAB Experiment</kwd>
        <kwd>Scenario Scanner</kwd>
        <kwd>Business Process Management</kwd>
        <kwd>Change2Twin</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction and Motivation</title>
      <p>
        Digital transformation encompasses a broad spectrum of initiatives ranging from IT
modernization considering legacy systems, over streamlining processes through digital
optimization to adopting innovative business models. To develop a business strategy for
digital transformation, aligning information and operational technology can be supported
by using various methods to discover, model, analyze, measure, improve, and optimize
business processes – known as business process management (BPM). Based on Gartner’s
definitions [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], the liaison among business processes and digital technologies seems natural.
      </p>
      <p>
        Starting with, a targeted set of exact search terms was elected to provide an indication
on research trends in a BPM context. The results (see Table 1) deem from a selection of
international renowned databases and illustrate that a plethora of literature on BPM exists
(till October 2023), while the numbers significantly decrease regarding digital technologies,
innovative approaches, or digital transformation. Although digital twins (DTs) are already
widely researched, DTs of processes are barely established and cannot found before 2018.
Nevertheless, the well-established discipline BPM can be considered as a driver of
organizational efficiency. However, contemporary ecosystems are marked by agility and
uncertainty resulting in disruption and business model innovation. Hence, traditional BPM
requires transformation towards more flexibility, modularity and context-sensitivity [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ].
For the evolution of BPM, emerging digital technologies pose several challenges ranging
from technological to organizational aspects requiring sophisticated management
approaches – in this paper building upon conceptual modelling.
("Business Process Management")
(M"BanPaMg-ebmaseendt-bAapsepdroAapcphr"oaOcRh")"Business Process 0
(("Business Process Management") AND ("Digital
Transformation" OR "Digital Technologies" OR 112
"Digital Technology"))
(P(r"oDciegsistaels"T)wAiNnDo(f"aBuPsrionceessssP"rOocRes"sD"iOgiRta"lBTPwMiNn"o))f 0
      </p>
      <p>With respect to digital technologies, the European H2020 project Change2Twin [20]
aims at supporting small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises in their digital
twinning efforts. The project includes the provisioning of appropriate DT solutions, which
is far from being trivial. This paper attempts to bridge conceptual modelling – particularly
in form of (business) process models – and the establishment of DTs. Specifically, scenario
building is used to elaborate on the connection between the digital models and the real
world. The paint production pilot case of Change2Twin is used to demonstrate DT
challenges related to the production process.</p>
      <p>Concluding the introduction, the overlying question for this work is how conceptual
modelling (starting with BPM) must transform to a more agile, interactive, and innovative
approach, allowing to gain benefits from digital technologies, while keeping the human in
the loop. The following chapters present a selection of related work that is followed by the
proposed model-based approach referred to as Scenario Scanner. The next chapter
illustrates the experimental prototyping for the Change2Twin pilot case. The work is
concluded with brief insights on further research.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Related Work</title>
      <p>
        A deeper look into selected publications on BPM-based approaches revealed diverse
application domains – ranging from adaptive processes for learning purposes to the
management and monitoring of IoT devices – underpinned with related industrial tools.
Contemporary, BPM is considered as a key success factor for digitization initiatives
harmonizing business and IT perspectives [10] building upon process optimization
considering context and dependencies of process-related models influencing process
architectures and their evaluation. Going beyond digitization, the implementation of a
multi-sensor approach [11] for monitoring hand-operated process parts revealed that a
combination of sensors, context and process data is needed to digitally monitor manual
business processes. However, there is still a gap in more integrative and cyber-physical BPM
approaches. The plethora of existing modelling and formalization approaches can serve to
tackle this gap, where an essential aspect is the readability of the models influencing the
validation by human experts [12]. Here, business process modelling can support process
analysis for instance by applying process automation and mining techniques facilitating the
translation of sensor measurements and logs into human actions. Especially in hybrid and
heterogeneous environments across industries, model-driven workflow automation – e.g.
using the BPMN 2.0 standard – facilitates human system interaction for both automated and
manual subprocesses [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. However, often there is a lack of process specification and
understanding. Therefore, BPM is used to restructure the interpretation and management
of processes, such as academic processes [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. Here, key performance indicators (KPIs) are
used to quantify the positive impact of applying business process models. Going one step
further, BPM can be an approach to tackle quality management – particularly process
quality – for instance in the electrical motor industry [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. A more comprehensive approach
for process modelling with the goal of transforming and improving business performance
is enterprise business process analysis [24]. Decision making is supported by considering
several functional aspects as well as perspectives such as strategy, architecture or
automation. The top five customer-rated products are Visio (Microsoft), ADONIS (BOC
Group), ARIS (Software AG), SAP Signavio Process Manager (SAP), and Process360 Live
(iGrafx). The products are rated based on capabilities, deployment options, integration
competences, evaluation strength and contracting flexibility, as well as on service and
support. Among the top capability features are support for distributed teams, decision
making, discovery and harvesting process and business knowledge, architecture alignment
as well as access to data. Based on the industrial tools, it can be observed that process
management goes beyond modelling by offering advanced analysis and collaboration
mechanisms. Concluding the above, BPM’s relevance is unchallenged in several industries
when it comes to formalization and structuredness.
      </p>
      <p>With regard to technologies, a strive for the integration of conceptual models with digital
technologies and related services makes sense in the long run to foster transparency and
understandability in complex heterogeneous and agile environments. Starting from a
business perspective, the OMiLAB Community of Practice [21] offers such an innovation
environment that looks into business ideas and drills them down to the level of feasibility
experiments. Here, conceptual modelling serves as an intermediary between business and
cyber-physical experimentation. Digital twinning is an underlying concept of the OMiLAB
environment, establishing conceptual representations bridging business and technological
perspectives. In [22] the integration of DTs into organizational structures and business
models is proposed. Technology-wise there has been a lot of research on DT development,
whereas the connection to business aspects is deficient. Hence, the authors suggest
extending the DT design towards capability driven development such as developing DT
management dashboards based on capability design and context models including KPIs and
historical data about components’ performances. [23] points out that targeted DTs of
organizations come across challenges such as interdependencies requiring innovative
ways, like more comprehensive vocabulary, compared to current business process models.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. The Scenario Scanner – An interactive model-based Approach</title>
      <p>
        The Scenario Scanner builds upon the OMiLAB Innovation Environment [16] aiming at
facilitating the tackling of digitalization challenges. OMiLAB’s architecture is structured in
three main layers, which are business, conceptual modelling, and proof-of-concept layer.
Those layers are considered being in line with the building blocks of the Scenario Scanner.
A set of (modelling) tools and approaches accompany the laboratory ecosystem such as the
meta modelling platform ADOxx [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] and the OMiLAB modelling ecosystem [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] that enable
domain specific modelling, the OLIVE microservice framework [19] supporting data- and
service-related questions as well as the digital design thinking environment Scene2Model
[9] transforming haptic scenarios to digital models. In particular, the Scenario Scanner aims
at paving the way for developing a methodology supporting the establishment of DTs of
processes by bridging conceptual models (including digital model) and digital technologies
(often building upon physical devices in the real world).
considered to have the same characteristics as the related lab experiment. In the middle,
complex domain concepts are decomposed, and the usage of conceptual modelling allows
for formalization enabling advanced analysis, while at the same time being understandable
for humans. On the bottom, there is a specification of appropriate digitization hardware for
collecting the relevant data to feed the scenario. The parts of the Scenario Scanner that are
supported by the physical OMiLAB environment are referred to as experiments.
      </p>
      <p>
        The scenario building starts from a business perspective drilled down to experimental
prototypes of DTs. An innovative design thinking approach is followed to create physical
scenes describing business processes in a co-creative way. This can be done either following
a pen and paper-based approach or in a technology supported way based on the
Scene2Model [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] modelling method. In order to co-creatively design application scenarios,
domain experts are collaboratively asked to reason over a targeted use case and represent
a scene with available elements in form of paper figures or post-its – the scene is stepwise
updated as it is supposed to evolve over time. The domain experts will use several domain
scenario elements depicting the application scenarios’ aspects of interest. Application
scenario elements can be classified in elements on impact (e.g. cases, events), processes (e.g.
tasks, procedures), organizational aspects (e.g. personnel, skills, relationships) and
resources (e.g. material, infrastructure, devices). The proposed classes are in line with the
perspectives that can be used for structuring goals and KPIs relevant for analysis purposes
and more generic for managing knowledge to improve performance [17].
      </p>
      <p>Identifying the right balance between top-down and bottom-up approach is not trivial.
On the one hand, disruptive business models must be supported to deal with the
contemporary agile ecosystems, potentially resulting in additional hardware (sensors or
actuators) needs. On the other hand, existing hardware should be exploited to limit
infrastructure costs and risks. The Scenario Scanner is intended to support in this balancing
act by establishing experiments – where possible considering underlying processes and
BPM efforts that are already in place in application scenarios – focusing on relevant aspects
of digital transformation and managing the transition from the domain concepts to physical
devices and vice versa via a model-based approach. Digitization patterns [15] are applied –
on both, the experiment, and the real application case – in order to facilitate the selection of
proper measures and technologies for implementing the scenario characteristics. However,
the reader should bear in mind that the scenario building will evolve with further
experiments towards a more holistic method (e.g. applying patterns or providing
recommendations) supporting conceptual modelling and exploiting contemporary digital
technologies.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Experimental Prototype of the Paint Production Pilot in Change2Twin</title>
      <p>Change2Twin perceives DTs as “a digital replica of an artefact, process or service that is so
accurate that it can be the basis for decisions. The digital replica and physical world are
often connected by streams of data”. This experiment illustrates the paint production pilot
revealing the potential of DTs and related technologies in manufacturing. Originally, the
paint producer strongly relied on paper-based documentation, where an error-proneness
of the manual activities could be observed. Therefore, the company intended the installation
of a real-time inventory, leveraging the paper-based documentation. Starting with the
design building block of the Scenario Scanner, a series of process modelling workshops with
representatives of the paint producer and digital technology providers was conducted.
Based on the process map of the production plant a focus was set on the raw material flow,
the production process itself, and the labelling process. Detailed digital process models were
designed (involving the middle building block of the Scenario Scanner) in guided workshops
to depict the activities of the production and the labelling as well as their execution
sequence. Means of abstraction were applied onto the defined processes to reduce the
complexity and focus on the digitization relevant aspects. The digitization (involving the
bottom building block of the Scenario Scanner) was tackled building upon the digital models
(considered as an early stage of a DT). Referring to the digitization building block of the
Scenario Scanner, (process) modelling served as a foundation for the technology
specification and documentation following an event-based approach. Ideas on digitizing a
production use case were presented in [13], a focus on integration considering models, data
and products was set in [18] and the usage of physical experiments to reduce the use case
complexity were researched in [14].</p>
      <p>Summarizing, three digitization challenges were extracted: the digitization of (a) the
production process, (b) the raw material warehouse, and (c) the product information.
Starting from completely analogous machines was particularly challenging for the
development of a DT. Hence, the DT experiment in the OMiLAB mirroring the production
process was used to transparently discuss the digitization challenges among the
heterogeneous stakeholders such as technical or business experts. The experiment (see
Figure 2) used a simplified, familiar association – the making of tea – covering the major
pilot characteristics to identify appropriate infrastructure. RFID technology – one
digitization option – was used to digitize production orders, material slots and production
process steps. Going through the process, the captured information enables monitoring in
real-time paving the way for further analysis such as process simulations and predictions.
Haptic process simulations were used to collect event data in form of timestamps allowing
conclusions on stock levels or maintenance plans. After the finalization and evaluation of
the paint production experiment, the pilot company decided to equip the production stages
and the warehouses with RFID technology (similar to the one used in the experiment)
allowing for a continuous collection of data throughout the process highly leveraging the
manual documentation towards a real time DT approach.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Conclusion and Outlook</title>
      <p>In line with traditional BPM approaches, the Scenario Scanner is intended to support the
establishment of DTs of processes. So far, the automation of currently manual steps was
researched by implementing promising digital technologies and services. Showcased in the
Change2Twin project pilot, digital twinning was facilitated by scenario building in the
manufacturing domain. The usage of physical experimentation is considered promising to
leverage conceptual modelling towards more interactivity and innovation. However, in
future a more comprehensive methodology on how to apply the Scenario Scanner by
conducting application scenario experimentation in heterogeneous domains is expected to
contribute to conceptual modelling in general and to targeted concepts for innovative BPM.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>This work was supported by the European H2020 project Change2Twin (“Create and
Harvest Offerings to support Manufacturing SMEs to become Digital Twin Champions”) with
grant agreement ID 951956 that started on 1st of June 2020 and will end on 30th of
November 2024. Details can be found on the project webpage: www.change2twin.eu.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1] ADOxx.org, Metamodelling Platform,
          <year>2024</year>
          . URL: adoxx.org/live/home.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Gartner</given-names>
            <surname>Glossary</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Digitization - Digitalization
          <string-name>
            <surname>- Digital Transformation - Business Process</surname>
          </string-name>
          Management
          <year>2024</year>
          .
          <article-title>URL: gartner</article-title>
          .com/en/information-technology/glossary.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Holzmüller-Laue</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Göde</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Thurow</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A BPM-based approach of human task support within life science automation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: 2013 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI)</source>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>167</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>174</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/HSI.
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <volume>6577818</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Imgrund</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>C.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Janiesch, Understanding the Need for New Perspectives on BPM in the Digital Age: An Empirical Analysis</article-title>
          , in: C. Di
          <string-name>
            <surname>Francescomarino</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dijkman</surname>
          </string-name>
          , U. Zdun (Eds.),
          <source>Business Process Management Workshops, 2019, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing</source>
          , vol
          <volume>362</volume>
          , Springer, Cham. doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/978-3-
          <fpage>030</fpage>
          -37453-2_
          <fpage>24</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Karagiannis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Buchmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Burzynski</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>U.</given-names>
            <surname>Reimer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Walch</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Fundamental Conceptual Modeling Languages in OMiLAB</article-title>
          , in: D.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Karagiannis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mayr</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J. Mylopoulos (Eds.),
          <source>Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling: Concepts</source>
          ,
          <source>Methods and Tools</source>
          , Springer International Publishing, Cham,
          <year>2016</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>3</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>30</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/978-3-
          <fpage>319</fpage>
          -39417-
          <issue>6</issue>
          _
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Mohanty</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
            <surname>Babu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Quality management in a fractional horsepower electrical motor industry: a case study</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag</source>
          <volume>13</volume>
          ,
          <issue>5</issue>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ), pp.
          <fpage>2764</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2789</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/s13198-022-01625-1.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Montes</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F. D.</given-names>
            <surname>Giraldo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Application of a BPM-Based Approach in the Redesign of the Academic Follow-up Process of a Public High School in Colombia</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: 2020 XLVI Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)</source>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>118</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>127</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/CLEI52000.
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <volume>00021</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Muck</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Palkovits-Rauter</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Conceptualizing Design Thinking Artefacts: The Scene2Model Storyboard Approach</article-title>
          , in: D.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Karagiannis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hinkelmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          , W. Utz (Eds.),
          <source>DomainSpecific Conceptual Modeling: Concepts</source>
          ,
          <source>Methods and ADOxx Tools</source>
          , Springer International Publishing, Cham,
          <year>2022</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>567</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>587</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/978-3-
          <fpage>030</fpage>
          -93547-4_
          <fpage>25</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>