<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Motivating Students in Purposes (ESP) Learning English for Specific</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Saniya Kabdrgalinova</string-name>
          <email>ksaniyabah@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Altynay Kenzhebekova</string-name>
          <email>a.kenzhebekova@iitu.edu.kz</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Leila Mirzoyeva</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Zhannura Manapbayeva</string-name>
          <email>zh.manapbayeva@iitu.edu.kz</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Yevgeniya Daineko</string-name>
          <email>y.daineko@iitu.edu.kz</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>International Information Technology University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Manas St. 34/1, Almaty, A15M0F0</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="KZ">Kazakhstan</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Motivating students in the context of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) is crucial for successful language learning and its effective application in proficient areas. This article explores various strategies and approaches to motivate students in ESP, taking into account the unique characteristics and goals of this specialized language learning context. Drawing on recent research and scientific findings, the article discusses the key factors that influence motivation, presents practical methods for increasing motivation, and highlights the importance of the teacher's role in increasing student engagement. By implementing these strategies, educators can create an inspiring and motivating learning environment that will enable students to become enthusiastic, successful and active learners in their field and empower students to realize their language learning objectives in ESP. English for Specific Purposes (ESP), motivation, language learning, student engagement, teacher role</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>As general concept motivation is originated from the root ‘motive’ and defines the driving reasons
behind actions and behaviors’ as well as it is ‘a physiological desire fueled by specific internal or
external rewards or incentives’. And the most important point is identification of person’s or
group’s factor of motivation focusing on the process of cultivating it in the effort of increasing
‘desire, action, and performance’. Generally motivation appears as a concept consisting of three
independent components that are ‘activation, intensity, and persistence’, moreover, they are
considered not only to work together, but also to push individuals and teams to take certain actions
and choose a definite way.</p>
      <p>While motivating it is essential to keep in mind the next characteristic features: the base for
motivation is internal or external intensive or reward; the mentioned above three independent
components comprise all types of motivation; the majority of people become motivated by
emotional wants, social desires as well as biological needs. Moreover, typically there considered to
be two broad motivational types: intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. All the internal incentives or
rewards refer to intrinsic motivation while all the external incentives or rewards refer to extrinsic
motivation.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Main Body</title>
      <p>0000-0003-0661-9982 (S. Kabdrgalinova); 0009-0001-1520-5987 (A. Kenzhebekova); 0000-0003-4174-9897 (L.
Mirzoyeva); 0000-0003-4650-1727 (Zh. Manapbayeva); 0000-0001-6581-2622 (Y. Daineko)
© 2023 Copyright for this paper by its authors.</p>
      <p>Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).</p>
      <p>
        According to the history of language learning as foreign or second, it started in the second half of
the previous century and a large amount of publications appeared between the 70s and 80s of the
twentieth century. And starting with the 90s more prominent researches were offered by Brown
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], Dörnyei &amp; Csizér [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ] and others. Fortunately, nowadays there are lots of literary publications on
motivation in language learning
covering other subareas relating to this sphere among which, for example, motivation in education
or motivation of learners.
      </p>
      <p>Coming up to motivation in the area of education it should be more related to theoretical ideas
rather than advice on actions. So, educational theories of motivation will be centred on such
theoretical concepts as the equity theory, expectancy theory and arousal theory of motivation. In
the cases used appropriately these motivational theories will become powerful and actionable
drivers of motivation for individuals and teams.</p>
      <p>As for the learners’ motivation, while defining the ways of motivating students there are specific
internal and external motivators including incentive, achievement, competence, and creative
motivational types.</p>
      <p>
        So, what is motivation from the point of view appropriate to language learning? According to
Dörnyei and Ottó [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] “In a general sense, motivation can be defined as a person's dynamically
changing cumulative arousal that initiates, directs, coordinates, enhances, completes, and evaluates
the cognitive and motor processes through which initial desires are selected, prioritized, acted
upon, and successfully or unsuccessfully realized”. Motivation is considered to be a key factor in
explaining any success or failure of an activity. It is obvious that the successful implementation of a
task demonstrates the fact that a person or a team is motivated. Though it is quite easy to state that
the language learner is successful with relevant motivation no one could offer an appropriate
understanding of the idea of motivation and how it is created, promoted and preserved.
Researchers, teachers and learners believe that motivation is a key phenomenon of mastering any
language while learning.
      </p>
      <p>
        As Dörnyei [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] believed a large amount of theories and models create difficulties but not the lack
of theories that explain what motivation is. Moreover, Dörnyei [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] stated that the complexity of the
idea of motivation is based on the attempts to elaborate learner’s actions on behaviour that couldn’t
be explained by the only approach.
      </p>
      <p>
        Motivation can be defined as a combination of attempt, desire and positive attitude to reach the
language learning objectives. That is, motivation to learn refers to some kind of extent in the
direction in which the learners move trying to learn the language thanks to the desire. Having only
efforts alone is not an indicator of motivation. So, Gardner [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ] argues that motivated learners try to
spend effort towards the goal or aim, but it couldn’t be stated that the learners' expending efforts
are not motivated.
      </p>
      <p>
        According to Crookes and Schmidt [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ] motivation may be defined as learners’ orientation with
regard to the goal of learning the language. Cole [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] states that motivation is the individuals’
internal state, which instigates, directs and maintains their behaviour. Among the important
theories on motivation established by Gardner [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ] there is the socio-educational model that
represents the attitudes and motivation in language learning and defines and clarifies the
distinction between integrative and instrumental motivation.
      </p>
      <p>Integrative motivation indicates learners who desire to be a representative of culture relative to
the language being learnt. Moreover, it is typical for these learners to identify themselves with the
features and values of the culture representing the language. Thus, they learn the language in order
to study, to work, to socialize or even live in the language-speaking country, interact with people
who speak this language, and etc.</p>
      <p>As for instrumental motivation, it is considered that it is connected with the idea of learning a
language, which later may be used as a means for various purposes. In this case, the language
couldn’t be the learners’ goal, but their tool used for much higher purposes like studying,
entertaining, reading, and etc. Relatively to instrumental motivation from the learners’ point of
view language may be useful in the future, but for them, there is no definite interest in that language
itself.</p>
      <p>
        Another classification worth mentioning is defined as traditional and proposed by Deci and Ryan
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ], which explains intrinsic motivation as a choice that learners make for their own sake, without
any external component, since they are already intrinsically rewarded. The definition given is very
close to Gardner and Lambert's [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ] view of dividing motivation into two distinct aspects, but Deci
and Ryan [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ] changed the category names to include some considerations that were not included in
previous classifications. In this regard, intrinsic motivation has been linked to students' interests
and goals, that is when they develop skills in completing a task because it is their will. In contrast,
extrinsic motivation consists of external stimuli that influence learners' language behaviour. Brown
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ] defines behavioristic motivation as ‘anticipation of reinforcement’. As well he defines
‘motivation as the learner’s driving force to learn and orientation as the purpose for learning’. The
same idea is supported by Ward [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ] who proposes to define motivation as ‘a spur to action’.
      </p>
      <p>Thus, taking into account lots of ideas on defining motivation being one of the prominent stimuli
or incentives that drive individuals towards their objectives relatively in accordance with their
intrinsic or extrinsic type of motivation which may be classified as integrative or instrumental
motivation there have to be concepts to influence motivation in English language learning whether
for special purposes or just as foreign language.</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>2.1. Factors influencing motivation in ESP</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>2.1.1. Relevance and authenticity</title>
        <p>
          According to Dudley-Evans and St. John [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ] learners are motivated when they perceive the
direct connection between language learning and their professional goals. According to Gardner
and Lambert [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ], ‘the learner’s ethnocentric tendencies and attitudes toward the members of the
other groups are believed to determine how successful he will be, relatively, in learning the new
language’. One way to increase motivation is to make learning relevant to students' goals and
objectives. This forces them to actively participate in language learning processes. According to
Gardner [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ], the materials and activities used play an important role in influencing students'
motivation levels. Moreover, Fasold and Connor-Linton [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
          ] argue that challenging and varied
learning activities help students concentrate and engage in learning and facilitate language
learning.
        </p>
        <p>
          When students determine that the learning materials they use are aligned with their goals, their
motivation increases. In this case, motivation influences the success of language learning. Moreover,
students are more motivated when the material they are learning is authentic and interesting to
them, for example, relevant to their future major and useful for their future careers. So, reinforcing
the idea that materials need to be authentic, Wilga [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
          ] points out that students need to be
prepared or put into action. Students do not exist solely to be given boring, tedious and repetitive
materials. But these are individuals with their own internal motivation, which determines what
they learn and what they don’t. Regarding the relevance of materials, Belcher [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
          ] believes that “the
use of real-life materials and tasks that simulate professional situations” stimulates student
engagement and motivation.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>2.1.2. Influencing motivation in ESP</title>
        <p>
          Research on learner autonomy in language education is believed to have begun in the 1990s, and
research related to the process of empowering learners in their learning is critical. Dickinson [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
          ]
states that encouraging student autonomy in language learning needs to be justified. He argues that
learning success and increased motivation depend on students taking responsibility for their
learning, being able to control their learning, and understanding that their learning successes and
failures should be attributed to their own efforts and strategies rather than to factors outside their
training. Each of these conditions is a characteristic of student independence.
        </p>
        <p>
          In relation to learner autonomy and self-regulation, Little [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
          ] states that providing
opportunities for students to take responsibility for their learning promotes motivation and
independent language development and, according to Benson [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>
          ], allows learners to take control
of their learning, set goals, make choices and improve their motivation and sense of ownership.
Later, Benson [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
          ] proposes five practical approaches to developing learner autonomy:
resourcebased - independent interaction with educational materials; technology-based – independent
interaction with educational technologies; learner-based – to manage psychological and
behavioural change; classroom-based - to change the student-teacher relationship and control
students over assessment and learning planning; curriculum-based – to extend the idea of control
over learning planning and assessment to the curriculum as a whole.
        </p>
        <p>
          In addition to students' capacity for autonomy, it is believed that their motivation should be seen
as an integral part of human nature, but it requires supportive interpersonal interactions and a
well-designed learning environment for positive growth. Ushioda [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>
          ] proves that thanks to
learners' supportive interpersonal processes that foster the development of autonomy and the
growth and regulation of motivation from the inside they reach their goals and objectives but not
only by progressive attempts to regulate their behaviour.
        </p>
        <p>It can be noted as well that when a person self-regulates to achieve his goals, his behaviour is
reflected in the environment, which functionally becomes an input, which is subsequently used for
self-regulation of behaviour. Thus, this theory of self-regulation defines the determinism of the
interdependence of the individual and the environment.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>2.1.3. Task variety and interest</title>
        <p>According to Willis and Willis [23], “engaging students in a variety of tasks and activities that
align with their interests and goals promotes motivation and active participation.” Regarding types
of tasks and activities such as task-based learning and project-based learning, Ellis [24] and
Markham [25] argue that experiments with them produced better results and students became
much more motivated, interested, active and self-confident.</p>
        <p>Personalizing the learning process requires attention from teachers and other professionals.
Referring to this idea, Basturkmen [26] emphasizes that “tailoring tasks and materials to students'
individual needs and interests increases their motivation and investment in learning processes.”
Other approaches to language learning include web-based, computer-based, and practice-based
resources, as well as self-study materials.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-5">
        <title>2.1.4. Social interaction and support</title>
        <p>Among the factors influencing motivation in language learning, the influence of cooperative
learning should also be mentioned. The learning process requires the submission of team projects,
participation in group discussions, as well as peer assessment, and involves support from peers and
other students while participating in a wide range of activities and tasks that require cooperation
and socialization. Mercer [27] argues that encouraging peer interaction, group projects, and
discussion creates a supportive learning community and increases motivation.</p>
        <p>Furthermore highlighting features enhance learners’ motivation no one will dispute the
importance of positive Teacher-Student relationships. According to Dörnyei and Ushioda [28]
building rapport, providing support, and offering constructive feedback contribute to students'
motivation and sense of belonging. According to Zhang's [29] study, teachers' enthusiasm plays an
important role in increasing students' engagement and motivation to learn. The main starting point
of the study was to assess students' perceptions of teachers' enthusiasm; in addition, they had to
evaluate their performance from an emotional, cognitive and behavioural point of view. Students
were then asked to rate their intrinsic and extrinsic motivation to learn. The results showed that
teacher enthusiasm had a significant impact on student engagement. At the same time, it was the
teacher’s enthusiasm that played a significant role and was an effective tool and indicator of
students’ internal motivation. It is due to the interest of teachers in their subject, the level of
enthusiasm and energy that teachers show while teaching, that students' motivation to learn
succeeds and increases. The teacher's role is to encourage support for learners’ autonomy, and
relevance, and at the same time, coherence of the material increases their motivation to learn.
Moreover, a teacher's ability to develop students' interest in the subject taught, competence, and
self-efficacy perceptions are vital factors influencing students' learning motivation. Thus, student
learning is influenced by motivation. Students have a natural ability to learn, much depends on the
participation of teachers. Sometimes, students' enthusiasm, determination and energy towards the
subject matter or the tasks assigned to it require constant reinforcement through external support.
In this case, it is teachers who ensure the creation of a favourable environment that facilitates and
improves student learning and often provides the external support they need. Although students'
motivation to learn languages and other necessary things can be both intrinsic and extrinsic, the
teacher's role in creating the right environment and supporting their learning will further enhance
their motivation to learn.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-6">
        <title>2.2. Strategies to motivate students in ESP</title>
        <p>Lamb [30] states “Clearly articulating learning goals and their relevance to students' future
careers creates a sense of purpose and motivation.” Thus, without having clear objectives such
problems in learning professional English as struggling with both content (professional sphere) and
language itself (i.e. grammar material, vocabulary etc.) may be irrelevant. Moreover, De la Cruz and
Cupil highlighted that “when planning a lesson for Content-based Instruction (CBI), scholars
recommend to include both content and language objectives” [31]. Also, there will be some
problems of students’ motivation related to setting clear objectives. First of all, those objectives
should be achievable, Locke &amp; Latham [32] also stated that breaking down long-term goals into
smaller, attainable milestones helps students stay motivated and focused on their progress; and it
will be one of the motivating factors. Secondly, those objectives should be correlated with students’
personal and professional interests, otherwise, they will be less motivating.</p>
        <p>Likewise, setting clear learning goals and expectations, establishing rapport and creating a
positive learning environment should be considered as one of the main ways to motivate students.
According to Levy [33], a teacher can create a positive classroom environment and increase student
motivation by using online platforms, multimedia resources, various types of interactive tools and
games that enrich the learning experience and keep students motivated.” As Mirzoeva and
Kabdrgalinova [34] state, “the power of gamification can increase students’ focus and persistence in
learning. By playing games and failing repeatedly, students can learn from it.”</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Research procedure</title>
      <p>To find out the motivating factors for learning English for professional purposes, a survey was
conducted. The questionnaire was considered the most effective tool because, according to Rupa
and Rani [35], it is “often used in quantitative marketing and social research. A questionnaire is a
series of questions asked of individuals to obtain statistically useful information on a given topic.
When designed correctly and used responsibly, questionnaires are a vital tool with which to make
statements about specific groups, individuals or entire populations.” This study is a type of
qualitative research; otherwise, the questionnaire presented below was used to more objectively
identify the main problems and motivating factors among our research group. The questions were
aimed at clarifying various aspects of learning English, including a positive learning atmosphere,
good mutual understanding when learning ESP on the one hand, and some difficult aspects on the
other hand. Thus, this type of survey is considered the most effective measurement tool for this
study. The questionnaire was filled out in English (since most students had an intermediate level).
The survey was conducted among students who had completed a university English course, so
participants answered the questions objectively, honestly and responsibly. The questionnaire was
posted online using a Google form and consisted of 15 questions, both open and closed. The study
presents only a large portion of the results. Some questions asked, such as those about
extracurricular activities at the university, were excluded. Moreover, they can be used as starting
material in subsequent stages of research.</p>
      <p>The issues are therefore grouped into three different organizational areas:
1. “Learning Objectives” sections, including questions about learning objectives, teacher, and
materials used relationship between teacher and students, etc. (Questions 1 – 5).
2. Factors related to the language itself, students' interest and motivation for this language
(questions 6–10).
3. Questions related to “Professional English”, IT experience, etc. (Questions 11 – 15).</p>
      <p>The average age of participants in this study was 18–19 years. By gender, the total number of
respondents was 36 students, including 25 boys (69.4%) and 11 girls (30.5%). The predominance
of male students over female students can be explained by the fact that more male students tend to
choose computer science majors related to applied sciences.</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>3.1. Results</title>
        <p>The first group of questions was those in which students had to evaluate the relationship
between teacher and student in English lessons. So here are the results: “Very positive and
supportive” (72.2%), “Mostly positive” (22.2%) and “Neutral” (5.6%). This suggests that the overall
perception of teacher-student relationships in English lessons among the students surveyed is
predominantly positive. However, it is worth noting that there is a small percentage of students
who are neutral about these relationships, indicating that there is room for improvement in
strengthening bonds with these students.</p>
        <p>Then the students were also asked to rate the teacher's performance on a scale from 1 to 5,
motivating them to learn English. And the results were as follows: 23 students considered the
teacher’s work “very effective and engaging” (63.9%) indicating a positive impact on their
motivation to learn, 11 students decided that it was “effective” (30.6%) supporting the notion of
positive influence and only 2 students answered “quite effective” (5.6%). The role of a teacher's
performance in motivating students to learn English is crucial. A teacher's effectiveness and
engagement can greatly impact students' motivation levels and their willingness to actively
participate and engage in the learning process.</p>
        <p>Moreover, students shared information about the most challenging aspects of learning English.
The results are as follows: Speaking and pronunciation are the most difficult skills, mainly because
they think this is the skill they will use most often to communicate in real life. Those who
emphasized grammar said this mainly because they believed that if they did not have the necessary
knowledge of the grammar of a language, they would not be able to speak or write. Finally, those
who chose to listen did so because it was important to be able to speak and understand other
people's speech. With this rationale, we see that one of the key features of the communicative
approach is that students' understanding of English primarily as a means of oral communication
lies in the way they perceive it. However, although students understand the value of oral skills, they
are also the most difficult, along with grammar. (See Figure 3).</p>
        <p>In light of this logic, we can see how students generally view the English language as a means of
oral communication, which is one of the primary features of the communicative method. However,
even though students understand how important oral skills are, they, along with grammar, are the
most difficult to master.</p>
        <p>Then students were required to answer questions about technologies used to support various
English language learning skills and how they are treated in the classroom (Figure 4). The results
presented in Figure 4 can be explained by the fact that the majority of students (50%) benefit from
using language learning apps very often. The remaining students said that they show interest in
online resources: “sometimes” (25%) and “rarely” (16.7%), and “never” (8.3%). Based on these
findings we can conclude, it is evident that students greatly benefit from using technology in
English classes and genuinely enjoy the experience. Technology provides students with access to a
vast array of resources and materials that enhance their language skills. Online dictionaries,
grammar tools, and language learning applications offer immediate feedback and personalized
learning experiences. Students can explore authentic texts, audiovisual content, and interactive
exercises, allowing them to practice reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills in a dynamic and
engaging manner.</p>
        <p>The next question the learners were asked relates to the idea what teachers should not do if they
want their students to remain motivated to learn English. The data received can be divided mainly
into two categories. So, the first category concerns teaching methods, and the second one concerns
Teacher-Student communication. In this regard, half of the students are of the opinion that teachers
should not be too strict or give excessive amounts of homework, because students will still cheat
and, as a result, will not gain knowledge. The teacher while pointing out mistakes makes a lot of
comments about them, gives boring assignments, or teaches only according to the curriculum, and
as well teachers should not allow students to be passive in the classroom. The other half is more
concerned with Teacher-Student interaction. They believe that teachers should not get angry with
students if they do not understand some aspects of the English language, or should not treat them
negatively, and criticize them.</p>
        <p>So there is the second group of questions. This collection of inquiries is necessary to describe
students’ motivation to learn a language. Knowing whether students have specific goals to improve
their English proficiency is critical, as those who admit it are likely to be more motivated to learn
than those who deny it. This will form the basis for explaining the results, with additional aspects
taken into account and detailed below. Thus, 38.9% of the participants in this study had clear goals
to improve their English, while the remaining students (62.1%) provided varied responses.</p>
        <p>The results show that the majority of students (38.9%) often set precise goals to improve their
English language skills. The remaining part of the students stated that they always set goals
(13.9%), sometimes (33.3%) and rarely (13.9%). Setting specific goals in learning English is crucial
for students and it can be for several reasons. First of all, setting specific goals provides clarity and
direction to students' language learning journey, secondly, it can significantly enhance students'
motivation and commitment to learning English, thirdly, specific goals help students manage their
time effectively and lastly it promotes long-term progress and growth. Despite all the merits of
setting exact goals, we still can witness in Figure 5 that not all the students do it on a regular basis
or into it.</p>
        <p>The following question was related to the main reasons why students study English. In general,
it can be said that students usually study English for career development, which is represented by
47.2% of students. Below is the rationale that good English communication skills are now required
for almost all jobs, especially in the IT sector. And 80% of tasks are completed if you speak English.
On the other hand, 27.8% of students study English for personal reasons and do so because they
enjoy learning the language. This statement can be made because, regardless of grades, they value
English for different reasons. Most of the positive responses concern students who value using
English in everyday life for communication, travel, hobbies and achieving future goals. The
remaining responses relate to academic demands (22.2%) and the fact that it is a global language
(2.8%).</p>
        <p>It is worth noting that students’ peers have no less influence on their overall motivation to learn
English. Moreover, more than half of the students surveyed, namely 55.6%, remain motivated by
their peers. Others claim that their peers have little or no influence on them. So, students' peers
have a significant influence on their learning of English. Additionally, peer feedback and correction
help students identify areas for improvement and enhance their language proficiency.</p>
        <p>Apart from the reasons already mentioned, learning English has several benefits. It is obvious
that regular hobbies of students include the use of smartphones, TV screens, computers and other
gadgets for computer games and connecting to social networks. Therefore, questions were asked of
the students regarding extra-curricular activities related to English, such as watching movies,
reading books, etc. According to the findings, only a very small portion of students rarely or never
participate in any of the above-mentioned activities: 38.9% of students actively participate, and
52.8% do it from time to time. (See Figure 7). Having analyzed these findings, we came to the
conclusion that students enjoy being involved in extracurricular activities while learning English
because it provides a fun and engaging learning environment, fosters skill development beyond
language acquisition, increases motivation and confidence, and exposes students to authentic
language and culture. These factors contribute to a more enjoyable and comprehensive language
learning experience, making extracurricular activities a valuable addition to the classroom setting.</p>
        <p>The last question in this section was about the learners’ evaluation of their own progress. So we
can conclude that 61.1% of them are satisfied with their improvement, 27.8% of them consider
being very satisfied, and 8.3% of the students feel neutral, while a very small percentage of students
are dissatisfied and seek more improvements.</p>
        <p>The final segment covers a range of questions about professional English, so students first had to
decide which English skills they thought were most important for their future career in IT. Among
them, 33.3% of students believe that reading scientific papers and technical documentation is a skill
they need to have if they want to succeed in their future careers. Respondents may also expect to
manage technical documentation in a future job, may be planning further education, or may be
influenced by a variety of other factors. With a difference of only about 2%, almost the same
number of participants believe that speaking and writing skills are the most important for their
profession. In addition, 25% of students want to become better at writing technical reports and
documentation, and 27.8% of them want to be able to participate in technical discussions and
meetings. 11.1% of students believe that the ability to give technical presentations is the most
important talent, and the remaining respondents, believe that the ability to bargain with third-party
vendors and technical support personnel is critical (See Figure 9).</p>
        <p>The final question in this section required the students to assess how their success in IT-related
courses and projects benefited from developing their technical English language skills. More than
50 per cent of the participants say it has improved their performance. Only a few students didn't
observe any influence, whereas one-third of the students claimed it had some impact. According to
the results presented in Figure 10, we can say that many students find that developing technical
English language skills significantly enhances their success in IT-related courses. Clear
communication and understanding of technical terms enable them to grasp complex concepts,
collaborate effectively, and excel in their studies.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>3.2. Discussion</title>
        <p>We can thus draw a number of inferences by taking into account all that was previously written.
First of all, the majority of students polled expressed a favourable opinion of the teacher-student
dynamic in English sessions. There may be space for improvement in developing deeper ties with
such students, though, as evidenced by the small minority of students who feel ambivalent about
the relationship. In addition, students' motivation levels and their readiness to actively participate
in the learning process can be significantly influenced by the efficacy and involvement of their
teachers.</p>
        <p>Thirdly, one of the key features of the communicative technique is evident: students generally
perceive the English language as a tool for oral communication. Oral skills are the hardest to
master, along with grammar, even if learners are aware of their importance. Subsequently, it is
apparent that students actually appreciate and gain a great deal from employing technology in
English classrooms. With the use of technology, students can access a wide range of materials and
tools that improve their language proficiency.</p>
        <p>After that, it's important to find out if students have set goals to become more proficient in
English. pupils who acknowledge this will probably be more driven to learn than those who don't.
Furthermore, it is imperative that students set precise goals when learning English, for a variety of
reasons, including improving motivation and clarity of interpretation. According to a further
conclusion, the majority of students study English for professional advancement, while the
remaining students do so for leisurely purposes or because it is required of them academically.</p>
        <p>Additionally, peer evaluation and rectification assist students in recognizing areas that need
enhancement. After analyzing the results, we also reached the inference that students derive
pleasure from participating in extracurricular activities while acquiring English as it offers an
enjoyable and captivating learning atmosphere, promotes the development of skills beyond
language acquisition, heightens motivation and self-assurance, and exposes students to genuine
language and culture.</p>
        <p>In conclusion, a majority of students recognize the importance of being able to read scientific
papers and technical documentation in order to succeed in their future careers. Additionally, they
view skills such as writing technical reports and participating in technical discussions and meetings
as crucial for their professional development. It is also evident that many students believe that
improving their technical English language skills greatly contributes to their success in IT-related
courses. By effectively communicating and understanding technical terms, they are able to
comprehend complex concepts, collaborate efficiently, and excel in their academic pursuits.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Conclusion</title>
      <p>Motivating students in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) is essential for their language
development and success in professional domains. By understanding the factors influencing
motivation, employing practical strategies, and recognizing the crucial role of the teacher,
educators can create a motivating learning environment that supports students' language learning
goals in ESP. Relevance, autonomy, task variety, social interaction, and teacher support are key
elements in fostering student motivation. By implementing these strategies, educators can inspire
and empower students to become active and enthusiastic learners, enabling them to achieve
success in their chosen professional fields.</p>
      <p>By considering the results of the survey, we can make several conclusions. Firstly, most students
have a positive view of the teacher-student relationship in English sessions. However, there is room
for improvement in developing stronger connections with these students, as a small minority feel
unsure about the relationship. Additionally, the effectiveness and involvement of teachers
significantly impact students' motivation levels and their willingness to actively participate in the
learning process.</p>
      <p>Furthermore, the communicative technique highlights one important aspect: students generally
see the English language as a means of oral communication. Mastering oral skills, along with
grammar, can be challenging for learners, even though they understand their importance.
Consequently, it is clear that students appreciate and benefit greatly from using technology in
English classrooms. Technology allows them to access various materials and tools that enhance
their language proficiency.</p>
      <p>Moreover, it is crucial to determine if students have set goals to improve their English
proficiency. Students who acknowledge this are likely to be more motivated to learn than those
who do not. Additionally, it is essential for students to set specific goals when learning English for
various reasons, including increased motivation and better understanding.</p>
      <p>According to another finding, most students learn English for professional development, while
others do it for leisure or academic purposes. Peer evaluation and correction also help students
identify areas that need improvement. After analyzing the results, we also conclude that students
enjoy participating in extracurricular activities while learning English as it provides an enjoyable
and engaging learning environment, promotes skill development beyond language acquisition,
boosts motivation and confidence, and exposes students to authentic language and culture.</p>
      <p>Finally, most students recognize the importance of being able to read scientific papers and
technical documentation for their future careers. They also consider skills like writing technical
reports and participating in technical discussions and meetings crucial for their professional
development. Furthermore, many students believe that improving their technical English language
skills greatly contributes to their success in IT-related courses. Effective communication and
understanding of technical terms enable them to comprehend complex concepts, collaborate
effectively, and excel academically.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. References</title>
      <p>Curriculum and Assessment. Dublin: Authentik, pp. 99–100.
[23] Willis, J., &amp; Willis, D. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press.
[24] Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[25] Markham, T. (2011). Project based learning. Teacher Librarian 39.2, pp. 38–42.
[26] Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Palgrave</p>
      <p>Macmillan.
[27] Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and
learners. Multilingual Matters.
[28] Dörnyei, Z., &amp; Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation. Routledge.
[29] Zhang, Q. (2014). Assessing the effects of the instructor enthusiasm on classroom
engagement, learning goal orientation, and academic self-efficacy. Communication Teacher,
28 (1), pp. 44-56. doi:10.1080/17404622.2013.839047.
[30] Lamb, M. (2017). The motivational dimension of language teaching. In: Language Teaching:</p>
      <p>Surveys and Studies. Vol.50(3).
[31] De la Cruz, A.A. Cupil, R.G. Clear Content and Language Objectives for CBI Revista</p>
      <p>Iberoamericana de Produccion Academica y Gestion Educativa. Vol. 8(16).
[32] Locke, E. A., &amp; Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and
task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
[33] Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in Use for Second Language Learning. The Modern Language</p>
      <p>Journal, December. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00972.x.
[34] Mirzoyeva, L., Kabdrgalinova, S. (2021). Use of Online Gamification Platform in Vocabulary</p>
      <p>Learning. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 3492646.
[35] Roopa S, Rani M.S. (2012). Questionnaire Designing for a Survey. J Ind Orthod Soc. 46(4):
273277.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brown</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1990</year>
          ). M&amp;
          <article-title>Ms for language classrooms? Another look at motivation</article-title>
          . In J. E. Alatis (Ed.),
          <article-title>Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics</article-title>
          , Georgetown University Press. pp.
          <fpage>383</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>393</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dörnyei</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Csizér</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1998</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Ten commandments for motivating language learners: Results of an empirical study</article-title>
          .
          <source>Language Teaching Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ), pp.
          <fpage>203</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>229</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dörnyei</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Otto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1998</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Motivation in Action: A Process Model of L2 Motivation</article-title>
          .
          <source>Working Papers in Applied Linguistics</source>
          ,
          <volume>4</volume>
          , pp.
          <fpage>43</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>69</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dörnyei</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1998</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Conceptualizing Motivation in Foreign Language Learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>Language Learning</source>
          ,
          <volume>40</volume>
          , pp.
          <fpage>46</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>78</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dörnyei</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Teaching and Researching Motivation</article-title>
          . Harlow. England: Longman.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gardner</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1985</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation</article-title>
          . Edward Arnold.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Crookes</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schmidt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1991</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Motivation: Reopening the research agenda</article-title>
          .
          <source>Language Learning</source>
          ,
          <volume>41</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>469</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>512</lpage>
          . http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-
          <fpage>1770</fpage>
          .
          <year>1991</year>
          .tb00690.x.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cole</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Management theory and practice</article-title>
          . London, UK: Thomson Learning.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Deci</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ryan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions</article-title>
          . New York, NY: Academic Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brown</surname>
            , H.,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed</article-title>
          .).
          <source>White Plains</source>
          , New York: Longman.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ward</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (n.d.).
          <source>Motivation. October 19</source>
          ,
          <year>2014</year>
          from http://sbinfocanada.about.com/od/motivation/g/motivation.ht m.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dudley-Evans</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>M. J. St John.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1998</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach</article-title>
          . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Robert</surname>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gardner</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Wallace E.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lambert</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1972</year>
          ). Newbury House Publishers,
          <year>313P</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gardner</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Motivation and second language acquisition</article-title>
          . University of Western Ontario,
          <year>2006</year>
          , December. http://publish.uwo.ca/~gardner/SPAINTALK.pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fasold</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Connor-Linton</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          ).
          <article-title>An introduction to language and linguistics</article-title>
          . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wilga</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1989</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Interaction and communication in the class in an age of technology</article-title>
          . Harvard University. http://books.google.com/books?hl
          <article-title>=en&amp;lr=&amp;id=3duWbNx-P gwC&amp;oi=fnd&amp;pg=PA186&amp;dq=Motivation+springs+from+within%3B+it+can+be+sparked,+bu t+it+cannot+be+imposed +from+without.+&amp;ots=Fv2ybzGqFT&amp;sig=bNyJzhiD7ZOUciUnYvtSoRiPOCM#PPA186,M1</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Belcher</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>English for specific purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study, and everyday life</article-title>
          .
          <source>TESOL Quarterly</source>
          ,
          <volume>40</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ), pp.
          <fpage>133</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>156</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dickinson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1995</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Autonomy and motivation: A literature review</article-title>
          .
          <source>System 23</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>165</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>174</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Little</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1991</year>
          ).
          <source>Learner Autonomy</source>
          <volume>1</volume>
          :
          <string-name>
            <surname>Definitions</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Issues and Problems. Dublin: Authentik.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          [20]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Benson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>Pearson Education.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          [21]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Benson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning, 2nd edition</article-title>
          . London: Longman.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          [22]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ushioda</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Motivation as a socially mediated process</article-title>
          . In Little, D.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ridley</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ushioda</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. (eds),
          <source>Learner Autonomy in the Foreign Language Classroom: Teacher</source>
          , Learner,
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>