<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>T. Ramos-Quispe);</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Perspectives on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Education: a Bibliometric Review</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Teresa Ramos-Quispe</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Dennis Arias-Chávez</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Sonia Esther Castro-Cuba-Sayco</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Federico Rosado</string-name>
          <email>frosadoz@ucsm.edu.pe</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>María del Pilar Ponce-Aranibar</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Claudia Acra-Despradel</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Miguel Angel Ortiz-Esparza</string-name>
          <email>miguel.ortiz@cimat.mx</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Center for Research in Mathematics</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Quantum Knowledge City, Zacatecas</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="MX">Mexico</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Universidad Católica de Santa María</institution>
          ,
          <country country="PE">Perú</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Universidad Continental</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Arequipa</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="PE">Perú</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>Universidad Nacional Pedro Henríquez Ureña</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Santo Domingo</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DO">Dominican Republic</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4">
          <label>4</label>
          <institution>Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa</institution>
          ,
          <country country="PE">Perú</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5">
          <label>5</label>
          <institution>Universidad Tecnológica del Perú</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2023</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>000</volume>
      <fpage>0</fpage>
      <lpage>0003</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Artificial intelligence has seen significant advances in recent years and represents an emerging technology that has revolutionized the way humans live. This technology is already being introduced in the field of education, although many teachers are unaware of its scope and, above all, of what it consists. Therefore, the present study shows the global production of scientific literature on artificial intelligence and education in the Scopus database between 1976 and August 2023. A sample of 1,280 documents was extracted from 612 sources. The results reveal a predominance of original research articles. As for the author with the greatest impact, Gwoyen Hwang stands out with an h- Index of 74 and more than 20 thousand citations in general. The most cited article is “Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education - where are the educators”, and the magazine Lecture Notes in Computer Science is the most productive source. Among the countries of origin of studies on AI and education, China stands out with the highest number of publications, as well as the highest impact index on the subject.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;bibliometric indicators</kwd>
        <kwd>artificial intelligence</kwd>
        <kwd>university</kwd>
        <kwd>education</kwd>
        <kwd>generative AI</kwd>
        <kwd>1</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>2010, advances emerged in voice recognition processes, spam filtering, and the development of
more sophisticated virtual assistants and recommendation systems. Starting in 2020, the use of
AI burst into more complex sectors such as healthcare, automotive, supply chain management
and cybersecurity (Sanabria-Navarro et al., 2023; Salmerón Moreira et al., 2023).</p>
      <p>Among the most important innovations, the development of generative AI stands out, which
allows generating diverse and contextually relevant content (Walczak &amp; Cellary, 2023; Kshetri,
2023). Generative AI is a form of artificial intelligence that uses machine learning and deep
analysis (Yu &amp; Gou, 2023). It leverages the availability of large-scale data and advances in deep
learning algorithms to develop models that learn from underlying patterns in the data to generate
novel results with high-quality precision and clarity. This subfield of AI also helps generate
images and music from input data. Currently there are several generative AI systems such as
GPT4, Open Assistant, DALL-E, Midjourney and others that have changed the landscape of information
acquisition and learning.</p>
      <p>In recent years, various studies have been carried out on the application of AI in the
educational sector. Among them, studies on the contributions of AI in education policies stand
out (Zhang et al., 2023); its inclusion in medical education (Ejaz et al., 2022); the responsibility of
human beings in making decisions for their inclusion in education (Doroudi, 2022; Ninaus &amp;
Sailer, 2022); Generative AI and its contribution to education (Yu &amp; Gou, 2023; Ahmad et al.,
2023); the AI methods used to improve the education experience (Mallik &amp; Gangopadhyay, 2023);
the design of learning environments based on this technology (Leitner et al., 2022; Han et al.,
2022), among many others. Now, despite its progress in terms of applications and proposals for
use, controversies have not stopped arising, especially when the role that AI should play in
education is brought up (Cukurova et al., 2019a), as well as if its use could replace the human
being or be a human assistance technology (Cukurova et al., 2019b). However, the evidence so far
has shown how useful its inclusion is for education, especially in times of pandemic where it
played a leading role in the migration process from in-person to virtual.</p>
      <p>Given that studies on AI and its application in the educational field have grown over the years,
this bibliometric analysis sought to present the current panorama of this technology through an
exhaustive review of the existing literature. The results can be of great help to education
professionals when developing effective strategies that contribute to the use of AI and its
implications at all educational levels. Also, it is important to highlight that this study provides
valuable information about authors, sources, growth, trends and topics of interest about AI, which
is significant for the understanding and advancement of research in this field.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Materials and methods</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>2.1. Search methods</title>
        <p>Scopus database was used, the search period spanned from 1976 to August 2023. The
keywords were checked by constantly filtering to corroborate the results. For the search, the
following formulas were generated: (TITLE (artificial AND intelligence) OR TITLE (machine AND
intelligence) OR TITLE (cognitive AND computing) OR TITLE (computer AND intelligence) OR
TITLE (robotic AND intelligence) OR TITLE (automated AND intelligence) OR TITLE (artificial
AND artificial intelligence) OR TITLE (machine AND learning) AND TITLE (education)). The data
were exported to Microsoft Excel 2019. After organizing the information, it was confirmed that
there were no duplicate articles.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>2.2. Data extraction and analysis</title>
        <p>The topic was chosen due to its novel nature, which is why the use of specific filters was not
necessary. Once the database was obtained, each of the documents was reviewed in order to
verify their relevance to the study. After this process, 1,280 documents were chosen that met the
eligibility criteria, that is, addressing the educational field at any of its levels as the main topic.
Four documents were excluded because they were not part of the educational theme. The rest of
the results were converted to CSV (comma separated values) and RIS (Research Information
System) formats to perform the analysis (Vasconcelo-Alvarez et al., 2016). For the evaluation,
the software Bibliometrix (Aria &amp; Cuccurullo, 2017) and VOSviewer (Van Eck &amp; Waltman, 2010)
were used. Figure 1 shows the stages of the research.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>3.1. Initial data analysis</title>
        <p>A total of 1280 articles from the Scopus database were analysed from 612 sources. The search
period was from 1976 to August 2023. Table 1 shows general information about the documents.
An annual growth rate of 12.84% was evident. There was also a high average of citations, close to
7 citations per published document.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>3.2. Information about authors</title>
        <p>Results</p>
        <p>Regarding the authors (see Table 2), the analysis showed a total of 2930 authors of the 1280
documents collected. Of this number, 327 were single authors. The average number of authors
per document was 3, while 16.17% of the documents had co-authorship or international
collaborations.</p>
        <sec id="sec-3-2-1">
          <title>Authors Results</title>
          <p>Regarding the initial data analysis, it was perceived that the type of document most frequently
produced on artificial intelligence and education was the original article, followed by conference
documents (conference paper) and book chapters (see Figure 2).</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>3.3. Overall production</title>
        <p>The global production per year is shown in Figure 3. A significant increase in research
production can be observed from the year 1976 to the year 2022 (from 1 article to 376 articles).
This data confirms the high annual growth rate, which is 16.17%. Figure 3 shows that in 2023,
292 documents have already been published, which confirms the validity and attractiveness of
the topic for researchers. It is important to highlight that the production of scientific documents
took off significantly starting in 2020, motivated by recent technological advances such as, for
example, the emergence of practical and significant applications in the field of artificial
intelligence or the development of models. of language like GPT-3 that allow machines to
understand and generate text more effectively. These advances have sparked greater interest in
the scientific community and industry, which has contributed to the development of the field of
this technology.</p>
        <p>Additionally, artificial intelligence is increasingly being used in a variety of practical
applications, such as healthcare, autonomous driving, machine translation, and natural language
processing. This has generated greater interest in the scientific community and industry, which
in turn has driven the production of articles on the topic.</p>
        <p>For paragraph, use Normal. Paragraph text. Paragraph text. Paragraph text. Paragraph text.
Paragraph text. Paragraph text. Paragraph text. Paragraph text.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>3.4. Second level sectioning</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-5">
        <title>3.4.1. Third level sectioning</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-6">
        <title>3.5. Sources</title>
        <p>Regarding the most relevant sources, the magazine Lecture Notes in Computer Science, of
Springer Nature publishing house stands out with 37 articles. In terms of impact, the magazine
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence (of Elsevier publishing house) stands out with an
h-index of 13 and 984 citations in total (see Table 3).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-7">
        <title>3.6. Most productive authors</title>
        <p>8.2</p>
        <sec id="sec-3-7-1">
          <title>Authors</title>
          <p>Gwoyen Hwang
h- Index
74
Utku Kose
twenty</p>
          <p>Fan Ouyang
Thomas K.F. Chiu</p>
          <p>Jiahong Su</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-8">
        <title>3.7. The most cited articles</title>
        <p>13
18
6</p>
        <sec id="sec-3-8-1">
          <title>Most cited article regarding the topic</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-8-2">
          <title>AI-Education</title>
          <p>Vision, challenges, roles and research
issues of Artificial Intelligence in</p>
          <p>Education</p>
          <p>Optimization of self-learning in</p>
          <p>Computer Engineering courses An
intelligent software system supported
by Artificial Neural Network and
Vortex Optimization Algorithm
Artificial intelligence in education The
three paradigms</p>
          <p>Sustainable resume planning for
artificial intelligence education A
selfdetermination theory perspective
Artificial intelligence in early childhood
education: A scoping review</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-8-3">
          <title>Affiliation</title>
          <p>National Taiwan
University Of Science</p>
          <p>and Technology
Süleyman Demirel
Üniversitesi, Isparta,</p>
          <p>Turkey
College of Education,
Zhejiang University,</p>
          <p>Hangzhou, China
Chinese University of</p>
          <p>Hong Kong, Hong</p>
          <p>Kong, China
The University of
Hong Kong, Hong</p>
          <p>Kong, China</p>
          <p>Table 5 lists the most cited articles in Scopus. The 2019 study “Systematic review of research
on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators?” by Olaf
Zawacki-Richter, Victoria I. Marín, Melissa Bond &amp; Franziska Gouverneur stands out. This article
seeks to provide an overview of research on AI applications in higher education through a
systematic review. The document has been cited 503 times, with an average of 100 citations per
year since its publication in October 2019 in the International Journal magazine of Educational
Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning (Springer Open).</p>
          <p>Also noteworthy is the article “Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and
learning in higher education” by Stefan AD Popenici and Sharon Kerr (2017). The study highlights
the educational implications of emerging technologies on the way students learn and how
institutions teach and evolve. Recent technological advances and the increasing speed of adoption
of new technologies in higher education are explored. This article was published in 2017 in the
journal Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning (SpringerOpen).</p>
          <p>The articles with the highest number of citations explore the use of artificial intelligence in
education, from a qualitative point of view. Roll &amp; Wylie (2016), for example, summarize this
aspect very well by predicting two parallel lines of research that must be carried out to have an
impact on education in the next 25 years: one is an evolutionary process, which focuses on the
current classroom practices, collaboration with teachers, and diversification of technologies and
domains; and the second, new technologies as a revolutionary process in which they must be
integrated into the daily lives of students.</p>
          <p>Olaf Zawacki-Richter, International Journal of Systematic review of research
Victoria I. Marín, Educational Research on artificial intelligence
Melissa Bond &amp; and Practice in applications in higher 503
Franziska Gouverneur, Technology Enhanced education – where are the
2019 Learning, 16(39), pp.1-27 educators?</p>
          <p>Research and Practice in Exploring the impact of
Stefan AD Popenici &amp; Technology Enhanced artificial intelligence on 307
Sharon Kerr, 2017 Learning, 12(22), pp. 1– teaching and learning in
13 higher education
Lijia Chen; Pingping IEEE Access, 8, pp. 75264- Artificial in
Chen; Zhijian Lin. 2020 75278 249
Intelligence</p>
          <p>Education A Review</p>
          <p>International Journal of Evolution and Revolution in
Gone Roll &amp; Ruth Artificial Intelligence in Artificial Intelligence in 243
Wylie, 2016 Education, 26:582–599 Education
Joseph E. Aoun. 2017</p>
          <p>Robot-Proof Education application of
Higher Education in the artificial intelligence 208
Age of Artificial technology Learning outcome
Intelligence. ISBN: and meta-diploma
9780262535977
TC per
year</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-9">
        <title>3.8. Impact by country</title>
        <p>The list of countries with the greatest impact on research on AI and education is led by China,
with 2,026 citations in Scopus, followed by the United States with 771 citations and Australia with
712 citations (see Table 6). The country with the highest number of scientific documents is also
China with 991 documents, followed by the United States (509), India (228) and the United
Kingdom (139). On the other hand, China presents an SCP (intracountry collaboration) of 350 and
an MCP of 27 (collaboration between countries), while the United States presents an SCP of 79
and an MCP of 9.</p>
        <p>The countries that have the highest number of collaborations are China and the United States
(10 collaborations), China and Hong Kong (10 collaborations), and the United States and Canada
(10 collaborations) (see Figure 4). It is important to highlight that collaboration between China
and the United States in artificial intelligence research is essential given the importance and
influence of their cultures. This collaboration will allow it to leverage its experience and
resources, address global challenges, maintain its global competitiveness and ensure that
artificial intelligence is developed and used ethically and safely for the benefit of humanity.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-10">
        <title>3.9. Co-occurrence analysis</title>
        <p>Keyword co-occurrence analysis generated 7 clusters, 395 elements, 11807 links and a total
edge strength of 28936. Cluster 1 (red), about students, had 148 occurrences and referred to the
iterations of the artificial intelligence with the students. Group 2 (green), which highlights
artificial intelligence as the main term, had 110 occurrences and refers to the general context of
artificial intelligence in education. Cluster 3 (blue), on education, had 87 occurrences and referred
to the various ways in which AI is applied in education. Group 4 (yellow), on Deep learning, had
25 occurrences and referred to various artificial intelligence techniques. Cluster 5 (purple), on
Covid 19, had 13 occurrences and referred to the impact of the pandemic on education. Group 6
(light blue) mentioned health and evaluated aspects related to health; and group 7 (orange), with
the keyword chat Gpt had 6 occurrences mentioning this emerging artificial intelligence
application (see Figure 5).</p>
        <p>On the other hand, the most significant author keywords were artificial intelligence (with 789
occurrences), students (with 245), engineering education (with 153), human (with 146) and
teaching (with 130), as seen in Figure 6. These keywords are the basis of the themes of the studies
that have been generated in the current context. The axes of interest are directly focused on
education in artificial intelligence, possibly with a focus on teaching artificial intelligence to
engineering students, focused on technological and human aspects of this discipline.</p>
        <p>Figure 7 illustrates the thematic map with the driving themes of high importance and
development which are located in the upper left quadrant. The determination of driving themes
helps drive the development of lines of research on artificial intelligence in general and topics
related to artificial intelligence technology, mental health education, and AI-based educational
platform in particular. The map also highlights topics related to virtual reality technology in
relation to the development of physical education.</p>
        <p>Among the topics highly developed internally, but of low relevance, the applications of
artificial intelligence, education and education systems based on it stand out. On the contrary,
among the emerging or declining topics, represented by topics of low development and little
importance in the academic world, generative artificial intelligence stands out. This term refers
to artificial intelligence systems capable of generating content, such as texts, images or music,
autonomously and creatively. Finally, in the upper left quadrant—as niche topics that constitute
widely specialized research areas, of great importance but low development—research on
artificial intelligence techniques and technologies stands out, in addition to their integration in
education.</p>
        <p>The results of the multiple correspondence analysis (MCA), based on the Conceptual Structure
Map (CSM) method, show the conceptual structure of the keywords associated with education
and artificial intelligence used in the articles included in this study (see Figure 8). Keywords
closest to the center point have been targeted with high frequency in recent years.</p>
        <p>Now, the explained variance of dimension 1 (x-axis) reaches 23.81%, which is the highest
value. On the contrary, the explained variance of dimension 2 (y-axis) is the least relevant with
21.38%. The red group of 14 words in the titles covers topics related to artificial intelligence,
machine learning and intelligence ai, which are closer to dimension 1. While keywords such as
education based on artificial intelligence are found in dimension 2. Group 2 (blue) is the least
significant and is distant from the central point. This group is made up only of two keywords
focused on aspects related to AI-based education.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Conclusions</title>
      <p>Bibliometrics is a type of quantitative analysis that uses various publication patterns (McBurney
&amp; Novak, 2002). The objective of this study was to conduct a bibliometric review of research on
artificial intelligence in the context of education in the Scopus database. To do this, the
characteristics of the publications, authors, sources, collaborations between authors and
countries and research networks were analyzed. Artificial intelligence (AI)—an umbrella term
that implies mimicking, with minimal intervention, the information process of intelligent
behavior and senses—is one of the most promising areas of research and has received
considerable attention, with coexisting pros and cons (Gao &amp; Ding, 2022).</p>
      <p>The study analyzed a sample of 1280 documents retrieved from the Scopus database, which
were published in 612 scientific journals, with 35,643 references and an average citation count
per document of 7.47. These documents were predominantly original articles (535), followed by
conference papers and book chapters, results that coincide with the bibliometric study by
HinojoLucena et al. (2019), for whom these types of documents are the most common given the
technological nature of the topic. Research output peaked in 2022, increasing at an annual rate of
12.84%. A significant growth in production is observed from 2017, motivated by the significant
advances from that year on in terms of artificial intelligence, particularly in deep learning (deep
learning) and natural language processing (NLP). These advances have allowed the development
of more sophisticated tutoring and personalization systems for education. Add to this the Covid
pandemic which accelerated the adoption of online education and, as a result, the importance of
artificial intelligence in education became even more evident in improving the online learning
experience. Ullrich et al. (2022), in their bibliometric study on artificial intelligence and teaching,
corroborate this growth.</p>
      <p>
        Regarding the most relevant sources, the magazine Lecture Notes in Computer Science stands
out with 37 articles. In terms of impact, the magazine Computers &amp; Education Artificial Intelligence
stands out with an h index of 13 and 984 citations in total. For Hwang &amp; Tu (2021) the journals
with the highest number of articles published on artificial intelligence are Computers &amp; Education
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ) and Journal of Educational Psychology (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ), which corroborates the results of this study. For
their part, Rashid et al. (2021) highlight in their study the magazines Computers &amp; Education,
International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning and Journal of Surgical Education as
the most productive in this field.
      </p>
      <p>Researcher Gwoyen Hwang has the greatest production and impact in this field. The most cited
article in Scopus is “Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Financing</title>
      <p>This research was not funded through any specific grant from public, commercial, or nonprofit
funding agencies.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. Data availability statement</title>
      <p>The information included in this article is the result of the analysis carried out by the researchers.
Readers or reviewers who require additional information to validate the content of the study
should send their queries to the authors.
[14] Hwang, G.-J., &amp; Tu, Y.-F. (2021). Roles and Research Trends of Artificial Intelligence in
Mathematics Education: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis and Systematic Review.</p>
      <p>
        Mathematics, 9 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060584
[15] Jia, K., Wang, P., Li, Y., Chen, Z., Jiang, X., Lin, C.-L., &amp; Chin, T. (2022). Research Landscape of
Artificial Intelligence and e-Learning: A Bibliometric Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.795039
[16] Kshetri, N. (2023). The Economics of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Academic
      </p>
      <p>
        Industry. Computer, 56 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ), 77-83. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/MC.2023.3278089
[17] Mallik, S. &amp; Gangopadhyay, A. (2023). Proactive and reactive engagement of artificial
intelligence methods for education: a review. Front. Artif. Intel. 6,1151391.
https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1151391
[18] McBurney, M.K. &amp; Novak, P.L. (2002). What is bibliometrics and why should you care?
Proceedings. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 108-114.
https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2002.1049094
[19] Ninaus, M. &amp; Sailer, M. (2022) Closing the loop–The human role in artificial intelligence for
education. F ront. Psychol, 13, 956798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.956798
[20] Leitner, M., Greenwald, E., Wang, N., Montgomery, R., &amp; Merchant, C. (2023). Designing
GameBased Learning for High School Artificial Intelligence Education. International Journal of
Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33, 384–398.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-02200327-w
[21] Pradana, M., Elisa, H.P., &amp; Syarifuddin, S. (2023). Discussing ChatGPT in education: A
literature review and bibliometric analysis. Cogent Education, 10 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ), 2243134.
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2243134
[22] Oliva Córdova, LM, Amado-Salvatierra, HR, Villalba Condori, KO (2019). An experience
Making Use of Learning Analytics Techniques in Discussion Forums to Improve the
Interaction in Learning Ecosystems. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds) Learning and
Collaboration Technologies. Designing Learning Experiences. HCII 2019. Lecture Notes in
Computer Science ( ), vol 11590. Springer, Cham.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-03021814-0_6
[23] Paucar Curasma, R., Villalba Condori, KO, Arias Chávez, D., Le, NT, Garcia Tejada, G., &amp; Frango
Silveira, I. (2022). Evaluación del Pensamiento Computacional utilizando cuatro robots
educativos con estudiantes de primaria en Perú. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS),
23. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.26161
[24] Pua, S., Ahmad, N.A., &amp; Khambari, M.N.M. (2021). Identification and Analysis of Core Topics
in Educational Artificial Intelligence Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Cypriot Journal of
Educational Sciences, 16 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ), 995-1009. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i3.5782
[25] Rashid, S., Khattak, A., Ashiq, M., Ur Rehman, S., &amp; Rashid Rasool, M. (2021). Educational
Landscape of Virtual Reality in Higher Education: Bibliometric Evidences of Publishing
Patterns and Emerging Trends. Publications, 9 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ), Article 2.
https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9020017
[26] Roll, I. &amp; Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education.
      </p>
      <p>
        International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ), 582-599.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3
[27] Sanabria-Navarro, JR, Silveira-Pérez, Y., Pérez-Bravo, D.-D. and Cortina-Núñez, MD (2023).
      </p>
      <p>
        Incidences of artificial intelligence in contemporary education. Communicate, (77).
https://www.revistacomunicar.com/index.php?contenido=detalles&amp;numero=77&amp;articulo=
77-2023-08
[28] Salmerón Moreira, YM, Luna Alvarez, HE, Murillo Encarnacion, WG and Pacheco Gómez, VA
(2023). The future of Artificial Intelligence for education in Higher Education institutions.
Conrado Magazine, 19 (93), 27-34.
https://conrado.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/conrado/article/view/3156/3022
[29] Song, P. &amp; Wang, X. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of worldwide educational artificial
intelligence research development in recent twenty years. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ), 473-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09640-2
[30] Tenório, K., Olari, V., Chikobava, M., &amp; Romeike, R. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Literacy
Research Field: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1989 to 2021. Proceedings of the 54th ACM
Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (pp. 1083-1089), USA
https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3545945.3569874
[31] Ullrich, A., Vladova, G., Eigelshoven, F., &amp; Renz, A. (2022). Data mining of scientific research
on artificial intelligence in teaching and administration in higher education institutions: A
bibliometrics analysis and recommendation for future research. Discover Artificial
Intelligence, 2 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ), 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00031-7
[32] Vasconcelo-Alvarez, R., Pedraza Melo, NA, Verástegui, J. and Cortes, A. (2016). The
relationship between intellectual capital and organizational performance. A bibliometric
review to 2015. Ide@s CONCYTEG, 142.
[33] Van Eck, NJ, &amp; Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for
bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ), 523-538.
[34] W amba, SF, Bawack, RE, Guthrie, C., Queiroz, MM, &amp; Carillo, KDA (2021).
[35] Are we preparing for a good AI society? A bibliometric review and research agenda.
[36] Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 164120482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.
[37] 120482
[38] Walczak, K. &amp; Cellary, W. (2023). Challenges for higher education in the era of widespread
access to Generative AI. Economics and Business Review, 9 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ), 71–100.
https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2023.2.743
[39] Yu, H. &amp; Guo, Y. (2023) Generative artificial intelligence empowers educational reform:
current status, issues, and prospects. Front. Educ., 8, 1183162.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1183162
[40] Yu, L.H. &amp; Yu, Z.G. (2023). Qualitative and quantitative analyzes of artificial intelligence ethics
in education using VOSviewer and CitNetExplorer. Front. Psychol. 14, 1061778.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1061778
[41] Zhang, T., Lu, X., Zhu, X., &amp; Zhang, J. (2023). The contributions of AI in the development of
ideological and political perspectives in education. Heliyon, 9 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ), Article e13403.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13403
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ahmad</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Murugesan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kshetri</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Education Sector</article-title>
          . Computer,
          <volume>56</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>72</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>76</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/ 10.1109/
          <string-name>
            <surname>MC</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2023</year>
          .3263576
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Aria</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cuccurullo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
          <article-title>bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Informetrics</source>
          ,
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>959</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>975</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <volume>08</volume>
          .007
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Baek</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Doleck</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
          <article-title>A Bibliometric Analysis of the Papers Published in the Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education from 2015-2019</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education (iJAI)</source>
          ,
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijai.v2i1.
          <fpage>14481</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bahroun</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Anane</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ahmed</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zacca</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Transforming Education: A Comprehensive Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Settings through Bibliometric and Content Analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>Sustainability</source>
          ,
          <volume>15</volume>
          (
          <issue>17</issue>
          ), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712983
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bozkurt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Karadeniz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Baneres</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guerrero-Roldan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>AE</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rodriguez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>ME</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Artificial intelligence and reflections from educational landscape: a review of AI studies in half a century</article-title>
          .
          <source>Sustainability</source>
          <volume>13</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>800</fpage>
          . https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su13020800
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Xie</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Past, present, and future of smart learning: A topic-based bibliometric analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>18</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00239-6
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cukurova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kent</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Luckin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019a</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Artificial intelligence and multimodal data in the service of human decision-making: A case study in debate tutoring</article-title>
          .
          <source>British Journal of Educational Technology</source>
          ,
          <volume>50</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>3032</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3046</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12829
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cukurova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Luckin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Clark-Wilson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019b</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Creating the golden triangle of evidenceinformed education technology with EDUCATE</article-title>
          .
          <source>British Journal of Educational Technology</source>
          ,
          <volume>50</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>490</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>504</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12727
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Doroudi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The intertwined histories of artificial intelligence and education</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>1</volume>
          -
          <fpage>44</fpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00313-2
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ejaz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>McGrath</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Wong,
          <string-name>
            <surname>BL</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Guise,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Vercauteren</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            , &amp;
            <surname>Shapey</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>J.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Artificial intelligence and medical education: A global mixed-methods study of medical students' perspectives</article-title>
          .
          <source>Digital Health</source>
          ,
          <volume>8</volume>
          . https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221089
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ding</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The research landscape on the artificial intelligence: A bibliometric analysis of recent 20 years</article-title>
          .
          <source>Multimedia Tools and Applications</source>
          ,
          <volume>81</volume>
          (
          <issue>9</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>12973</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>13001</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12208-4
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Han</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Park</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Analysis of the effect of an artificial intelligence chatbot educational program on non-face-to-face classes: a quasi-experimental study</article-title>
          .
          <source>BMC Medical Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>22</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ), Article 830. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03898-3
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hinojo-Lucena</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.-J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Aznar-Díaz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cáceres-Reche</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.-P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Romero-Rodríguez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.-M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Study on its Impact in the Scientific Literature</article-title>
          .
          <source>Education Sciences</source>
          ,
          <volume>9</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010051
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>