<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Asthma and Allergy Volume 15
patients</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/jaa.s285742</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>An Innovative Low-cost IoT-Based Asthma Exacerbation Prediction System Using Federated Learning⋆</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Amine Dahane</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">6</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Rabaie Benameur</string-name>
          <email>benameurrabaie@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">6</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Kheireddine Abainia</string-name>
          <email>k.abainia@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Dalila Benatta</string-name>
          <email>dfbenatta@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Souheila Meneceur</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">6</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Chemseddine Brakna</string-name>
          <email>chemseddinebrakna@gmail.coml</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">6</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Amin Bouamar</string-name>
          <email>aminbouamar97@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">6</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ghalem Belalem</string-name>
          <email>ghalem1dz@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">6</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Abdelmajid Snouber</string-name>
          <email>majidsnouber@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">6</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Abdelhamid Mellouk</string-name>
          <email>mellouk@u-pec.fr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Image, Signal and Intelligent Systems (LiSSi) Laboratory, TincNET Research Team</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Univ. Paris-Est Creteil</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="FR">France</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Institute of Applied Science and Technology ISTA</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Oran</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DZ">Algeria</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Laboratory of Industrial Computing and Networks (RIIR)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Oran</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DZ">Algeria</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>Oran Computer Science Laboratory (LIO)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Oran</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DZ">Algeria</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4">
          <label>4</label>
          <institution>PI: MIS Laboratory University 8 Mai 1945</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Guelma</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DZ">Algeria</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5">
          <label>5</label>
          <institution>Pulmonology Department, Oran University Hospital</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Oran</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DZ">Algeria</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6">
          <label>6</label>
          <institution>University of Oran 1</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Oran</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DZ">Algeria</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2020</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>15</volume>
      <fpage>1406</fpage>
      <lpage>1414</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper presents the design and development of a fog-IoT/AI asthma exacerbation system with full functionality. The system was developed using open-source platforms that monitor real-time medical data. Users administer the Asthma Control Test (ACT) to determine the likelihood of asthma exacerbations. The asthma data set comprises panel data from 10 individuals, with 1010 ACT scores as the desired output. ACT scores 19 reflect uncontrolled asthma; &gt;19 reflect well controlled asthma. This paper proposes a federated learning-based asthma exacerbation prediction system named FELAE. Specifically, the FELAE system protects data privacy through local learning, in which devices benefit from the knowledge of their peers by sharing only updates from their model with an aggregation fog layer that produces an enhanced prediction model. The results demonstrate that the FL approach outperforms the classic or centralized versions of machine learning (non-federated learning). Moreover, using the essential performance indicators, namely, accuracy, precision, f1score, and recall, the proposed model detects asthma exacerbations with the highest accuracy of 97.02%.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;IoT</kwd>
        <kwd>Asthma exacerbation</kwd>
        <kwd>Federated learning</kwd>
        <kwd>Centralized model</kwd>
        <kwd>Low-cost</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Healthcare Internet of Things (HIoT) refers to the
application of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and sensors in
the healthcare area. Connected to the internet and able to
collect, transmit, and analyze data in real time [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. In
addition, H-IoT devices enable healthcare providers to more
eficiently monitor and manage patients’ health
conditions in an optimal manner. More specifically, it seeks
to improve patient outcomes, the quality of care, and
healthcare costs. Thus, healthcare applications include
telemedicine, smart hospitals, remote patient monitoring,
and medication management [2] [3]. Among the
applications, we find the following (Figure 1):
ECG monitoring. records the heart’s electrical activity
over time, aiding in diagnosing cardiac conditions like
arrhythmias and heart disease. It’s utilized in hospitals,
clinics, and with devices like Holter monitors, event
monitors, and loop recorders.
      </p>
      <p>Temperature monitoring. Health IoT devices like
wearable sensors and smart thermometers ofer real-time
body temperature data, transmitted to healthcare
systems. Analysis of this data detects temperature trends or
abnormalities for early intervention, benefiting patients
and caregivers. Additionally, these devices aid in
monitoring the health of vulnerable individuals, notifying
caregivers of potential health concerns.</p>
      <p>BP monitoring. Blood pressure monitoring assesses
arterial force during circulation, vital for
cardiovascular health and detecting conditions like hypertension. A
sphygmomanometer, with cuf, gauge, and stethoscope,
measures systolic (during heartbeats) and diastolic
(between beats) pressures. These two numbers reveal
crucial information about an individual’s blood pressure and
overall well-being.
night waking up, activity limitation, lung function, and
medication usage over time. It is a critical tool for asthma
management, changing treatment programs, and
lowering the risk of asthma exacerbations. Individuals who
have efective asthma monitoring may attain optimum
asthma management and enhance their quality of life.
The symptoms of asthma can vary in severity and may
include:
• Wheezing: A whistling sound when breathing
out;
• Wheezing: A whistling sound when breathing
out;
• Chest tightness: A feeling of tightness or pressure
in the chest;
• Shortness of breath: Dificult breathing,
especially during physical activity [4].</p>
      <sec id="sec-1-1">
        <title>In this paper, we discuss the latest achievements in the</title>
        <p>Figure 1: The classification of HIoT applications. tackled field by focusing on diferent asthma care
approaches as well as describing some relevant healthcare
applications to our system. The impact of meteorological
conditions on people with asthma is characterized by
Oxygen saturation monitoring. Achieved through distinct and unique patterns, which may be attributed
non-invasive devices like pulse oximeters, assesses the to the intrinsic diversity in lung function found among
oxygen levels carried by red blood cells, aiding in res- asthmatic patients. The extent of this diversity is
depenpiratory function evaluation. This crucial process helps dent on demographic characteristics, such as age and
detect issues like hypoxia or respiratory failure by mea- gender. In addition, the geographic location adds an
addisuring SpO2, expressed as a percentage. Using light ab- tional level of complication since the connection between
sorption, sensors on the fingertip or earlobe accurately meteorological conditions and the symptoms of asthma
determine peripheral oxygen saturation, making it a valu- demonstrates inconsistency across various climatic zones.
able health assessment tool. Moreover, asthma systems are data-hungry, and data is
Medication management. Encompasses safe and ef- scattered over several hospitals with privacy limitations
fective medication use, including prescribing, patient in place. Traditional ML solutions need centralized data
education, and monitoring for side efects. It plays a collection and processing, which is becoming more
imcrucial role in optimizing patient health outcomes and practical due to eficiency challenges and growing data
minimizing adverse drug events. Efective medication privacy concerns [5]. As an outcome of these limitations,
management is essential for patient well-being. in 2017, Google introduced the federated learning (FL)
Glucose level monitoring. is vital for diabetes manage- approach, where the objective is to train a high-quality
ment through various methods like blood glucose meters, centralized model using training data dispersed over a
CGM systems, or lab tests. Frequency and targets depend large number of clients, each with unreliable and
generon individual needs. Mood monitoring. Utilizing tools ally sluggish network connections. As a result of these
like mood diaries or apps, aids in tracking and recording features and inspiration from the previous federated
sysemotional states. It assists those with mental health con- tems, FL is a hot research topic in smart HIoT. For
examditions by revealing patterns, identifying triggers, and ple, the data of several hospitals is segregated and forms
guiding treatment decisions, commonly used for depres- "data islands." Due to each data island’s size and
approxsion, anxiety, or bipolar disorder. imation constraints, a single hospital may not be able
Wheelchair management. Encompasses assessing mo- to train a high-quality model with excellent prediction
bility needs, choosing the right wheelchair, and ensuring accuracy for a particular application. In addition,
reguits safe and efective utilization. It enhances indepen- lations cannot force hospitals to provide data in many
dence and well-being while preventing complications cases. However, hospitals participating in FL can benefit
and improving functional outcomes for those with mo- from it, e.g., with higher model accuracy. A challenging
bility impairments. problem is designing a fair incentive mechanism to allow
Asthma monitoring. Asthma control tests, peak flow the contributing entity to benefit from FL. The rest of the
meters, spirometry, and electronic health records are paper is organized as follows: Section 2 briefly surveys
used to track an individual’s asthma symptom diaries, the related works. Sections 3 and 4 provide the materials
and methods used in this study, as well as the results of ity of life. The efectiveness of the proposed framework
the comparative study and the performance evaluation. for monitoring and regulating asthma exacerbations is
Finally, Section 5 concludes the paper and outlines the demonstrated through a case study. The previous
disperspectives for future work. cussion made it evident that there are some gaps in the
literature, including privacy concerns, computational
issues, and accuracy limitations for centralized models, all
2. Related works of which must be successfully addressed to secure smart
HIoT data. This paper presents the FELAE framework to
In this section, we present and review recent research solve these challenges. Sharing patient electronic health
works on IoT-based asthma exacerbation prediction sys- information across hospitals may not be possible due to
tems that investigate the most recent developments and the sensitive nature of healthcare data. In such cases,
challenges in this field. By analyzing these studies, we FELAE ofers a viable approach, enabling the creation
hope to provide insights and recommendations for future of a collaborative learning model for asthma data. The
IoT-based asthma prediction system research directions. main contributions of this paper are as follows:
Raherison-Semjen et. al [6] addressed asthma
management during pregnancy and the influence of environmen- • The design and development of a low-cost IoT/AI
tal factors on asthma. It emphasizes the significance of asthma exacerbation system.
taking risk factors and prospective comorbidities into • We investigate the implementation of three
account in asthma management and individualized man- deep learning classifiers: deep neural networks
agement plans for asthma patients. Oletic and Bilas [7] (DNNs), convolutional neural networks (CNNs),
described a method for detecting asthmatic wheezing and long short-term memory recurrent networks
noises using compressive sensing and machine learning (LSTMs) architectures.
techniques to analyze respiratory sound spectra. Us- • In addition, we present a comprehensive
perforing a digital stethoscope, the authors acquired respira- mance evaluation and comparison between the
tory sound data from asthmatic and non-asthmatic sub- FL approach and centralized learning models.
jects. The proposed method detects asthmatic wheezing
sounds with high accuracy and has potential applications
in portable and non-invasive asthma monitoring devices. 3. Materials and methods
Using computer science (CS) and ML techniques, the
study presents a promising strategy for the development
of an automated and accurate asthmatic wheezing
detection system. Anan et. al [8] described the creation of an
IoT-based remote health monitoring system for asthmatic
patients. The system consists of an Android application,
a website, and multiple sensors to collect health-related
data and facilitate communication between physicians
and patients. The system was determined to be
accurate and afordable for low-income asthma patients after
being tested on actual human subjects. Tsang et. al [9]
reviewed the use of machine learning algorithms in mobile
health for asthma management. The review highlighted
the potential of machine learning to improve asthma
management but also noted the need for larger sample
sizes and external validation of algorithms before they
can be used in clinical practice. The article discussed
various studies on the use of machine learning algorithms
for asthma management, including activity detection and
breathing monitoring. A fog-driven IoT e-Health
surveillance and control framework for asthma exacerbations
is proposed by Maach et al. [10]. The framework gathers
physiological data from asthma patients using
ubiquitous sensors, then processes the data using fog nodes
and cloud computation. By providing personalized and
timely interventions, the proposed framework is scalable
and has the potential to enhance asthma patients’
qual</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-2">
        <title>The IoT platform architecture, as shown in Figure 2, has</title>
        <p>been proposed to collect, transmit, and process the
physical parameters (temperature, humidity, O2, air flow) of
patients along with the weather forecast information to
manage the decision of asthma exacerbation. In our study,
it is necessary to transform pressure readings into airflow.
We convert the values obtained from the MPX5010 sensor
to kilopascals (kPa), utilizing a scale ranging from 0 to 40
kPa. As depicted in Figure 2, the network component of
our platform is supplied via multi-hop communication
between box A (the data collection layer) and box B (the
gateway node or fog layer) in order to deploy
classification and prediction models. We have used the NRF24L01+
(i.e., 2.4Ghz radio) module for wireless communication
and the Atmega328P (with Arduino bootloader) as
microcontrollers, as well as Raspberry Pi 3 B+ as a fog layer.
Data is stored closely in the fog layer, so doctors can
rapidly access data during interventions. In addition,
asthma data is accessible even if the internet connection
is temporarily lost. Processing and validating data at the
fog level reduces the data transmitted to the cloud and
conserves the energy consumption and global network
bandwidth. In a centralized learning configuration, as
illustrated in Figure 3, every client uploads his data to a
centralized deep learning server to train the prediction
model. In contrast, with the FELAE framework, the
entire process is adapted from the basic and widely used
framework of Federated Averaging (FedAvg) [5] [11]. In
particular, instead of training and assessing the model on
a single machine, all the clients train their local models
sharing the same structure, but with distinct and
individual datasets. Subsequently, the trained local models
are submitted to the aggregation server that combines
all the models to produce a single global model with
optimized parameters. This method allows the
participants (typically the hospitals) to share knowledge while
protecting the confidentiality of their sensitive
information. Importantly, this collaborative approach eliminates
the need for a high-authorization third party, a
requirement frequently associated with high levels of trust and
sturdiness. Such a requirement may impose financial
restrictions that inhibit broader participation in FL-related
initiatives. The current version of our system uses four
lfoating values to transmit, as well as the user’s ID code.
Each floating value is encoded in 4 bytes, while the user’s
ID code is encoded in 8 bytes. Overall, we have 32 bytes
to transmit from the emitter to the receiver. NRF24L01+
modules are configured to transmit and receive 32 bytes
at a rate of 2 Mbps for real-time monitoring. However,
due to the collisions and connections lost, we have
implemented a mechanism for auto-restarting the module after
ifnishing each transmission. This feature causes a minor
delay, but it ensures the stability of the transmission over
time.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>4. Results and discussion</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>In this section, we first detail the dataset and experimental settings used in this work before assessing our proof-of-concept FELAE scheme implementation.</title>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-1">
          <title>4.1. Experimental setup</title>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Our experiments were carried out using Google Colabora</title>
        <p>tory [12], where Python 3 served as the primary
programming language. The implementation of Convolutional
Neural Networks (CNNs), Deep Neural Networks (DNNs),
Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTMs), and FL
models leveraged widely recognized libraries.
Specifically, we utilized NumPy for the manipulation of
multidimensional arrays and matrices, as well as Pandas for
the manipulation of data structures and the utilization of
rich analytical tools.</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-2-1">
          <title>4.2. Dataset preprocessing</title>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>Data preprocessing is the first stage in which the un</title>
        <p>processed input data is filled, digitized, and normalized.
Fortunately, the chosen dataset has no missing NaN
values, and the corresponding numerical data are all
digitized. In this study, we used existing datasets in the
context of the asthma dataset with the target variable
ACT score.</p>
        <p>ACT scores 19 reflect uncontrolled asthma; &gt;19
reflect well controlled asthma [ 4]. The provided dataset
[13] [14] is divided in half at an 80:20 ratio. In other
words, 80% of the data is utilized for training, while the
remaining 20% is used for testing. Additionally, 80% of
the data from the training step is divided into K=4 clients,
each representing a hospital’s data in our example.
For the data distribution among the various clients,
we employed independent and identically distributed
(IID): Each FL client’s data distribution aligns with the
distribution of all the dataset’s data.</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-3-1">
          <title>4.3. Performance evaluation metrics</title>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>The metrics used for evaluating the models include precision, recall, F1 score, and accuracy. They are calculated as follows:</title>
        <p>Accuracy =</p>
        <p>+  
  +   +   +  
Precision =</p>
        <p>+  
Recall =</p>
        <p>+  
F1-score =
2 · (  · )</p>
        <p>+ 
• True Positive (TP): reports the number of ACT
scores samples that are correctly classified as well
controlled asthma.
• False Positive (FP): reports the number of ACT
scores samples that are wrongly classified as well
controlled asthma.
• True Negative (TN): reports the number of ACT
scores samples that are correctly classified as
uncontrolled asthma.
• False Negative (FN): reports the number of ACT
scores samples that are wrongly classified as
uncontrolled asthma.
• Accuracy: reports the proportion of properly
categorized samples to all other samples in the testing
set.
• Precision: reports the percentage of samples
properly categorized for all TP and FP in the testing
set.
• Recall: the ratio of TP samples to the total number
of TP and FN samples is known as recall.
• The F1-score reports the harmonic mean between
precision and recall.
(1)
(2)
(3)</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-4-1">
          <title>4.4. Severity of asthma classification through centralized learning</title>
          <p>Table 2 displays the precision, recall, accuracy, and
F1(4) score for binary-class classification for the centralized
model that used deep learning methods. It shows how to identify positive instances, both the CNN and DNN
well the model performs in predicting the severity of architectures generally outperformed the LSTM. This
inasthma for specific asthmatic patients (well controlled dicated their superior capability in identifying patients
asthma, uncontrolled asthma). In this analysis, we em- with severe asthma, which is especially noteworthy given
ployed three distinct neural network architectures, CNN, the absence of sequential data patterns in this context.
LSTM, and DNN, to forecast the severity of asthma for Lastly, precision, which measures the model’s ability to
specific patients in four diferent clients. We evaluated classify positive instances accurately, illustrated that the
the outcomes using various performance metrics, includ- DNN architecture consistently maintained higher
preciing accuracy, F1-score, recall, and precision. To begin, sion in most clients, implying a lower rate of false
posiwe assessed accuracy, a measure of overall correctness. tives. Conversely, the LSTM architecture produced more</p>
          <p>Table 2 shows that the CNN architecture consistently false positives, resulting in lower precision scores. In
sumachieved the highest accuracy across the clients, rang- mary, the DNN architecture emerged as the most efective
ing from 84.15% to 88.11%. The DNN architecture also choice for predicting asthma severity across the clients,
demonstrated respectable accuracy, ranging from 78.71% consistently excelling in accuracy, F1 score, and
precito 90.59%. In contrast, the LSTM architecture consistently sion. The CNN architecture also performed admirably,
exhibited the lowest accuracy, ranging from 72.27% to particularly in identifying cases of severe asthma. The
88.61%. Next, we considered the F1-score, which balances DNN architecture emerged as the most efective choice
precision and recall. The analysis revealed that the DNN for predicting asthma severity across hospitals,
consisarchitecture consistently had the highest F1 score across tently excelling in accuracy, F1 score, and precision. The
all clients, indicating its efectiveness in classification. CNN architecture also performed admirably, particularly
The CNN architecture also displayed robust F1 scores, in identifying cases of severe asthma.
while the LSTM architecture needed to catch up,
suggesting dificulties in achieving high precision and high
recall. Turning to recall, a measure of the model’s ability</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-4-2">
          <title>4.5. Severity of asthma classification through federated learning</title>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-5">
        <title>In this experiment, we demonstrate the feasibility of a FE</title>
        <p>LAE framework. This method requires the participation
of multiple clients, specifically hospitals, to share
knowledge while protecting the confidentiality of their sensitive
information. Importantly, this collaborative approach
eliminates the need for a high-authorization third party,
a requirement frequently associated with high levels of
trust and sturdiness. Such a requirement may impose
ifnancial restrictions that inhibit broader participation in
FL-related initiatives. To evaluate our proposed FELAE
scheme, we have conducted a series of tests. These in- Figure 4: Learning performances using a FedAvg-based
CNNvestigations involved the construction of a controlled FL model.
environment in which deep learning models (i.e., CNN,
DNN, and LSTM) were implemented on a Raspberry Pi 3
board. The figures 4, 5, and 6 show how well all four
global models worked over 10 rounds, with three diferent
deep-learning classifiers used for each client (hospitals).</p>
        <p>It is worth mentioning that the FL training process is
done over 10 rounds, where each model is saved after
every round to avoid overfitting after a long period of
training. The primary conclusion drawn from this study
is the discernible improvement in precision as a function
over iterative rounds across all FL global models. This
improvement signifies the concurrent progress and
mutual benefits realized by all the participants due to their
participation in the global model. A notable corollary
observation is that, in certain instances, global models
have demonstrated the ability to approach or closely rival Figure 5: Learning performances using a FedAvg-based
DNNthe performance levels attained by the centralized model. model.</p>
        <p>In the evaluation, we ran the FL training process for 10
rounds. However, we save the global model at each round
to avoid overfitting issues after a long training period. accurately discerning patients as either ’well controlled’
Table 3 shows a full analysis of how well three diferent or ’uncontrolled, boasting many true positives in these
neural network architectures CNN, DNN, and LSTM can categories.
predict the severity levels of asthma in a dataset of pa- Conversely, the DNN classifier accurately identifies
tients. The CNN classifier exhibits notable proficiency in patients at the extremes of well-controlled and
uncontrolled asthma, achieving high true positive rates.
Nevertheless, it also needs help classifying ’partially controlled’
cases, as it tends to make false predictions of ’well
controlled’ and ’uncontrolled’. The LSTM classifier
accurately distinguishes between well-controlled and
uncontrolled asthma cases, with notable true positives in these
extreme categories. According to Table 3, the CNN model
stands out as the top performer among the three
evaluated deep learning models, with a substantial accuracy of
97.02%. It excels at accurately categorizing patients with
varied levels of asthma severity and a substantial number
of true positives and true negatives. Notably, the
F1score, a metric balancing precision and recall, reaches an
impressive score (i.e., 97.01%), highlighting the model’s
efectiveness in minimizing false positives while
capturing true positives. In contrast, the LSTM model, although
reasonably accurate with an 89.10% accuracy rate,
grapples more with false positives and negatives. As a result,
its F1-score and precision are lower than those of CNN,
indicating dificulties in striking the ideal balance between
precision and recall. Finally, DNN reports good
performances with 94.05% accuracy. Like CNN, it maintains
an efective equilibrium between precision and recall,
leading to a high F1 score (i.e., 94.01%). Furthermore, its
precision slightly outperforms CNN, which lowers the
number of false positives. As presented in Table 3, CNN
can perform better with 97.02%, 94.05% for DNN, and
89.10% for LSTM, respectively. Overall, through these
experiments, we can highlight that CNN is the more
reliable and ranked first due to the strengths of extracting
the category features.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>5. Conclusions and future trends</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>This research paper proposes an innovative, low-cost,</title>
        <p>IoT-based asthma exacerbation prediction system using
the FL approach. Our proposed system aims to provide
asthma patients a user-friendly solution for monitoring
their symptoms and anticipating potential crises. The
three phases of data collection, analysis, and treatment
serve as a road map for the system’s ongoing
development. It is essential to acknowledge that there are several
perspectives for the future enhancement of this project.
As we continue our work, we plan to explore additional
features and functionalities to improve the system’s
efectiveness. The following recommendations summarize the
research challenges that could enhance the performance
of the proposed asthma exacerbation system:
• Using the proposed low-cost IoT/AI asthma
exacerbation system in order to generate our dataset
for the pulmonology department at the university
hospital in Oran.
• Use teacher and student networks and
knowledge distillation (KD) techniques to make models
smaller, faster, and more eficient.
• Include the most specific asthmatic symptom in
respiratory sounds, such as wheezing, in our
dataset.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>The mixed team IA-Respir, approved in January 2022 un</title>
        <p>der "Respiratory pathologies via artificial intelligence,"
supports this work. The authors would like to
acknowledge the medical team of the pulmonology department,
Oran University Hospital, and the Thematic Research
Agency in Health and Life Sciences (ATRSSV).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Dahane</surname>
          </string-name>
          , N.-E. Berrached,
          <article-title>Mobile, wireless and sensor networks: A clustering algorithm for energy eficiency</article-title>
          and safety,
          <year>2019</year>
          . URL: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781351190756. doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1201/ 9781351190756.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>