<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Knowledge-Based Systems</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1613-0073</issn>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/ACCESS.2024</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Discussions in News: A Knowledge Graph Analysis Empowered by AI</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Simone Angioni</string-name>
          <email>simone.angioni@unica.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Sergio Consoli</string-name>
          <email>sergio.consoli@ec.europa.eu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Danilo Dessí</string-name>
          <email>danilo.dessi@gesis.org</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Francesco Osborne</string-name>
          <email>francesco.osborne@open.ac.uk</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Diego Reforgiato Recupero</string-name>
          <email>diego.reforgiato@unica.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Angelo Salatino</string-name>
          <email>angelo.salatino@open.ac.uk</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="editor">
          <string-name>ESG, Knowledge Graph, Monitoring Tool, Extraction Pipeline</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Cagliari</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Cagliari</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>European Commission, Joint Research Centre (DG JRC)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Ispra</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Milton Keynes</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UK">UK</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>Knowledge Technologies for Social Sciences Department, GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Cologne</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>258</volume>
      <issue>2022</issue>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>1</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper explores the growing importance of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria in ifnancial assessments and conducts an AI-driven analysis of ESG concepts' evolution from 1980 to 2022. Focusing on media sources from the United States and the United Kingdom, the study utilizes the Dow Jones News Article dataset for a comprehensive analysis focused on the environmental domain. The research introduces an innovative information extraction technique, transforming extracted data into a knowledge graph. Key findings highlight recent trends in ESG aspects, with a notable emphasis on climate change, renewable energy sources, and biodiversity conservation in the environmental dimension.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>CEUR
ceur-ws.org</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Over the past few years, there has been a growing significance in using Environmental, Social,
and Governance (ESG) criteria for assessing financial investments 1
. The European Parliament
has recognized the importance of ESG ratings in its legislative endeavors to foster an economy
that truly serves the interests of the people. This recognition has resulted in specific initiatives,
including the implementation of the EU taxonomy for sustainable activities2, a resource aiming
to define a set of ESG standards for organizational conduct. It serves as a valuable tool for
socially conscious investors assessing potential investments.</p>
      <p>
        Monitoring and analyzing the portrayal and evolution of ESG-related concepts is crucial for
assessing changing perceptions in media and public opinion on sustainability and diversity [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
While various news monitoring tools, such as Brandwatch3, Brand244, Repustate5, Cision
Communication Cloud6, SentiOne7, and Meltwater8 are available for news analysis, current
systems lack a suficient representation of the nuanced dynamics of discourse. This deficiency
hinders their capability to support advanced queries related to entities mentioned in news
articles, limiting their ability to perform a comprehensive analysis of ESG discourse.
      </p>
      <p>
        To address this constraint, researchers have proposed diferent methods to create structured,
interconnected, and machine-readable data frameworks for analyzing news [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3">2, 3</xref>
        ]. Over the
past few years, knowledge graphs (KGs) have gained growing recognition for their capacity
to structure data in a semantically meaningful manner, ofering valuable assistance to diverse
AI systems across domains like medicine, research, education, robotics, manufacturing, social
media, and beyond [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. Large-scale knowledge graphs are often created through a process that
combines both structured and unstructured data, which is partially automated. When dealing
with extensive textual data, these methods commonly employ a range of natural language
processing techniques to create triples that capture essential concepts within a specific domain [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]
and optionally refined using a variety of link prediction techniques [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. This approach has been
applied across various fields, producing a variety of knowledge graph of research articles [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7 ref8">7, 8</xref>
        ],
medical data [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ], tourism-related information [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ], educational materials [11], and social media
posts [12]. These knowledge graphs are capable of facilitating a variety of intelligent services,
such as conversational agents [13] and analytical dashboards [14, 15], in addition to supporting
extensive domain analysis [16, 17, 18].
      </p>
      <p>In this paper, we present an AI-powered examination of ESG concepts and their development
spanning 1980 to 2022. The focus is on media outlets in the United States and the United
Kingdom, encompassing notable publications like The Guardian, The New York Times, and
The Times. The primary dataset employed for this investigation is the Dow Jones News Article
dataset9, recognized for its extensive and high-quality compilation of news articles.</p>
      <p>Our approach utilizes advanced information extraction techniques to condense relevant
information from articles into structured statements, represented as triples (&lt;subject, predicate,
object&gt;). The operational pipeline developed for this process is versatile. It can be implemented
on a standard server, eliminating the need for extensive computational resources typically
required by current large-scale language models for processing vast data sets. The primary
advantage of this innovative approach lies in its capacity to analyze various entity types (e.g.,
2EU taxonomy for sustainable activities - https://finance.ec.europa.eu/sustainable-finance/tools-and-standards/
eu-taxonomy-sustainable-activities_en
3Brandwatch - https://www.brandwatch.com/
4Brand24 - https://brand24.com/
5Repustate - https://www.repustate.com/
6Cision Communication Cloud - https://www.cision.com/
7SentiOne - https://sentione.com/
8Meltwater - https://www.meltwater.com/
9Dow Jones News Article dataset - https://developer.dowjones.com/datasets/details/news
organizations, persons, topics) while establishing meaningful relationships between entities
based on predicates extracted from the articles. Consequently, it serves as an efective tool
for analyzing substantial volumes of news content, gaining insights into key concepts, and
comprehending the evolution of discourse over time.</p>
      <p>In detail, our paper contributes in the following ways:
• We ofer an AI-driven analysis of the news discourse on ESG concepts spanning from
1980 to 2022.
• We introduce a comprehensive and automated pipeline designed for creating a Knowledge</p>
      <p>Graph (KG) from a collection of news documents.
• We provide various analytics on ESG concepts, delving into entities and statements
derived from a KG extracted from the news.</p>
      <p>Section 2 explores prior works related to KGs in news. Section 3 outlines the general pipeline
utilized for KG generation. In Section 4, the data source is outlined, and an overview of the
resultant KG centered on ESG aspects is provided. Section 5 delves into the analysis results.
Finally, Section 6 concludes the paper.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>2. Related Work</title>
      <p>
        The central aim of incorporating Knowledge Graphs (KGs) into news analysis is to depict and
establish connections among diverse entities within the news domain, encompassing individuals,
locations, events, topics, and factual information. This systematic representation enables a
more insightful examination of shifts in discourse over time. For example, Al-Obeidat et al. [ 19]
constructed a KG focused on COVID-19-related news, providing a platform for researchers
and data analysts to address the challenges posed by the pandemic. Gangopadhyay et al. [20]
analyzed a knowledge graph of online claims showing how misinformation can spread on the
web and the extensive work for verifying online discussed facts. Tan et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] concentrated
on electronics and supply-chain industry news to develop a KG emphasizing causal relations,
aiding companies in informed decision-making. Liu et al. [21] proposed a KG-based news
recommendation system, incorporating topic context, user interactions, and relevant relations.
Rospocher et al. [22] established an event-centric knowledge graph rooted in news sources,
emphasizing a temporal dimension for comprehensive entity histories. Fu et al. [23] devised a
multi-domain KG for enhanced fake news detection, leveraging semantic links and background
information. This tool surpasses existing techniques by efectively generalizing across single,
mixed, and multiple domains. Opdahl et al. [24] conducted a survey on research methods
utilizing semantic KGs for news production, distribution, and consumption.
      </p>
      <p>In contrast, our paper introduces a KG as a pivotal element in our AI-driven analysis of ESG
sectors. Uniquely, our KG is crafted to specifically facilitate the exploration of the evolution of
ESG discourse over time, providing a detailed representation of various entity types.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>3. The Adopted Pipeline</title>
      <p>The constructed pipeline comprises two main phases. In its initial stage, a Text Parsing Module is
employed to extract entities and their relationships from a set of news articles. The subsequent
stage involves a three-step process to generate the knowledge graph. Firstly, the Entity Extraction
Module identifies crucial entities and classifies them by type. Subsequently, the Relationship
Extraction Module discerns relationships among these entities from the news articles. Lastly,
the Triple Refinement Module concludes the process by refining the resulting triples, yielding
the finalized knowledge graph.</p>
      <p>The Text Parsing Module relies on the Stanford CoreNLP10 suite, an extensive collection of
natural language processing tools developed in Java. Utilizing the Part-of-Speech (PoS) Tagger,
this module assigns tags to each word in the provided text, identifying and classifying tokens
based on their grammatical categories (e.g., preposition (PRP), verb (VB), noun (NN), adjective
(JJ), etc.). Additionally, the module constructs a dependency tree for each sentence.</p>
      <p>Within the Entity Extraction Submodule, nominal phrases are identified as entities for the
knowledge graph. Nominal phrases constitute word groups with a noun or pronoun as the
primary word, accompanied by modifiers, determiners, and complements ofering additional
information about the noun (e.g., ‘long news article’). On the other hand, the Relationship
Extraction Submodule identifies connections between entities. For every sentence  , all the
shortest paths of the dependency tree between each pair of entities (  ,   )|  ,   ∈   containing a
verb are selected. This process yields various types of paths between entities, and the analysis of
these paths determines the most suitable ones for identifying relationships in the given context.
The paths used in [25] were employed for this purpose.</p>
      <p>The Triple Extraction Submodule performs three primary tasks: 1) relation refinement,
2) entity refinement, and 3) triple refinement. The set of triples  , generated in the
preceding step, may include triples with similar meanings but expressed through diferent verbs,
for example, &lt;company, build, 200-unit motel&gt;, &lt;company, construct, buildings&gt;,
&lt;craftsmen, create, accommodation&gt;. Relation refinement aims to identify the most
suitable predicate label  for each relation verb  in a triple &lt;   ,  ,   &gt; and map  to  in the resulting
triple. This phase reduces the space of possible relationships by analyzing the resultant verbs
and clustering them into a more concise set of well-defined relationships [ 25]. The method was
applied to the 393 verbs found in all the triples extracted from the ESG news dataset, resulting
in a final set of 57 predicates.</p>
      <p>The Entity Refinement module establishes an index based on the tokens contained within the
entities. This index links each token to all entities that contain it. For instance, the token Obama
is linked to entities such as Barack Obama, President Obama, former President Barack Obama,
Barack Obama’s Administration, Michelle Obama, and so on. Entities   and   ∈  are compared if
they share at least one token. This comparison is executed using the state-of-the-art framework
SentenceTransformers11, encoding the entities with the all-mpnet-base-v212 transformer model.
If the cosine similarity between entity   and   exceeds 0.9, they are grouped into the same
cluster. The reader notices that this value has been selected based on an empirical analysis that
considered the values 0.7, 0.8, 0.85, 0.9, and 0.95.</p>
      <p>For the Triple Refinement module, akin to the entity refinement step, a sentence transformer
model is used to detect and merge triples with the same meaning. As a final step, the resulting
10Stanford CoreNLP - https://stanfordnlp.github.io/CoreNLP/
11SentenceTransformers - https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers
12all-mpnet-base-v2 - https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2
triples are linked to the original papers and employed to construct the knowledge graph. Each
triple is associated with its support, indicating the number of news articles from which it was
extracted. To evaluate the pipeline’s accuracy, a sample of triples underwent assessment by
three reviewers, considering both the triple and the original sentences from which it originated.
The reviewers marked the triple as 1 if it accurately reflected the news articles’ content and 0 if it
did not. The average agreement between annotators was 0.89, indicating substantial consensus.
The pipeline’s accuracy, evaluated against the majority vote of the three annotators for 200
statements, was 0.85, with individual rater estimates ranging from 0.85 to 0.93, demonstrating
the pipeline’s ability to extract triples with high accuracy. More information about this pipeline
can be found in [26].</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>4. The Data Source and the Generated ESG Knowledge Graph</title>
      <p>The Dow Jones News Datasets encompass an extensive compilation of 15, 105, 283 news articles
spanning various languages. The dataset incorporates 13 English sources, including renowned
ones like The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and The Guardian, contributing to a total
of 7.3 million distinct news items. In assembling a repository of news articles concerning
ESG, we considered all news from 1980 to 2022 containing keywords related to Environmental,
Social, and Governance, either within the text body or metadata fields. The ultimate collection
comprises approximately 850, 000 news articles, distributed as 500, 000 on environmental topics,
290, 000 on social issues, and 60, 000 on governance. The pipeline detailed in Section 3 was
applied to this set of 850, 000 ESG news articles, resulting in a KG that includes over 7.2M
statements and 4M entities.</p>
      <p>For structuring the statements, we utilized a lightweight ontology tailored to the primary
purpose of aiding news analysis. The ontology defines four main classes: i) aggregated statement,
ii) fine-grained statement, iii) News, and iv) Entity. It also specifies 57 object properties derived
from the predicates outlined in Section 3. Furthermore, the ontology maps the statements using
the original verb alongside their version utilizing the 57 predicates obtained by clustering them.</p>
      <p>Each statement in ESG-KG incorporates: - rdf:subject, rdf:predicate, and rdf:object, providing
the reification of triples within an rdf:Statement; - provo:wasDerivedFrom, supplying provenance
information and listing the DNA-IDs of the news from which the statement is derived; -
esgkg:statement_negated, a boolean indicating whether the statement was derived from a negative
sentence (True) or not (False); - esg-kg:original_triple, listing the fine-grained versions of the
statement.</p>
      <p>Additionally, each news ID is linked to xsd:date, ofering the news publishing date, and
esg-kg:source, providing the original journal source name.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>5. Exploration of the News Discourse on ESG</title>
      <p>The analysis presented in this section relies on various analytics derived from the knowledge
graph.</p>
      <p>Figure 1 illustrates the distribution of the three primary topics (Environmental, Social, and
Governance) over time. Historically, environmental issues have consistently dominated,
representing 55% to 75% of coverage. However, a noticeable trend shows an increasing focus on
social issues, growing from approximately 20% in 1980 to nearly 40% by 2022. This shift seems
to be propelled by heightened interest in subjects such as ethics, racism, gender identity, and
global human rights.</p>
      <p>The environmental component encompasses 2 million entities, the social aspect covers 361,000
entities, and the governance section comprises 209,000 entities. These entities are categorized
based on the Named Entity Recognition (NER) tool provided by Spacy, and their types and
frequencies are detailed in Table 1.</p>
      <p>The KG includes 3.8 million statements: 3 million statements about environmental topics,
600,000 related to social issues, and 236,000 concerning governance.</p>
      <p>We present the foremost ten political groups (Table 2), geopolitical entities (Table 3),
prominent individuals (Table 4), and organizations (Table 5) for each category.</p>
      <p>An impactful observation underscores the USA’s significant role in ESG discourse, evident in
the top three groups comprising Democrats, Republicans, and Americans. Moreover, frequently
mentioned individuals center around US Presidents, encompassing figures like Bush, Obama,
Clinton, and Trump. The United States emerges as the most cited country in articles related to
Environmental and Social aspects, underlining its perceived leadership status in these domains.
Conversely, China takes the lead in discussions on Governance, with Beijing and Japan often
mentioned in conversations about employee rights, securing the fourth and fith positions
among the most referenced countries for Governance.</p>
      <p>Our exploration then delves into the Environmental domain, scrutinizing the evolving trends
of key entities. This involves computing the annual frequency of each entity and applying
linear regression to discern the trajectory of these entities’ yearly distributions. The slope of the
regression line serves as an indicator of the trend’s momentum, with a steeper slope signifying a
more rapid surge in media coverage for the specified entity. This analytical technique, commonly
employed to detect key trends, finds application in areas such as research topics [ 27]. Results
are presented in Table 6, where slope_10 denotes the trend over the last 10 years, and slope_5
indicates the trend over the last 5 years. To accentuate common themes, related entities have
been manually clustered and highlighted in the same color.</p>
      <p>Entity</p>
      <p>The environmental facet of ESG centers on assessing a company’s influence on the natural
world and its approach to managing environmental risks. Table 6 presents entities that have
exhibited notable increases in mentions over the past decade and the last five years.
Freq.</p>
      <p>Slope 10 Years</p>
      <p>Slope 5 Years
• Climate and Carbon Emissions 6: Central to discussions involving the measurement of
carbon footprints, implementation of initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and
the formulation of strategies to mitigate the efects of climate change [ 28]. The increased
visibility of these entities in news narratives underscores the growing importance of
taking concrete measures to combat climate change.
• Renewable Energy: Positive trends suggest a rising emphasis on the use of renewable
energy sources and the adoption of energy-saving practices in public discourse. This shift
towards energy eficiency reflects broader societal and economic recognition of the
beneifts associated with sustainable energy practices. With the increasing urgency to address
climate change, the push for more eficient energy usage and the transition to renewables
becomes a central theme in policy, industry, and community conversations [29].
• Biodiversity and Land Use: The upward trend over the past five years underscores
the significance of these issues. Specifically, the focus on deforestation and biodiversity
highlights the media’s growing concern and interest in the conservation of natural
habitats, ecosystems, and biodiversity. This focus aligns with global eforts to achieve
biodiversity conservation targets and sustainable development goals [30], emphasizing
the need for a holistic approach to environmental stewardship that includes protecting
diverse ecosystems and ensuring responsible land use.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>6. Conclusions and Future Works</title>
      <p>In this manuscript, we provide a preliminary examination of ESG concepts and their
evolutionary trajectory spanning from 1980 to 2022, concentrating on news content sourced from
the United States and the United Kingdom. Employing the Dow Jones Article dataset, our
investigation encompasses news articles from well-known newspapers like The Guardian, The
New York Times, and The Times. To execute this analysis, we initially applied an extraction
pipeline to the news articles, involving the organization of extracted data into a Knowledge
Graph (KG). The methodology employed advanced information extraction techniques to distill
pertinent information from articles into structured statements represented as triples. These
triples underwent aggregation, and verification, and were used in constructing a comprehensive
knowledge graph. The implemented pipeline is versatile, applicable across domains, and
facilitates the analysis of various entity types while establishing semantic relationships between
them based on information extracted from news articles. The information extraction pipeline
underwent rigorous evaluation by three annotators, achieving an accuracy of 0.85.
Subsequently, the resulting knowledge graph was utilized to scrutinize the three core components
of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), with a specific focus on the environmental
domain. In future work, we plan to overcome some limitations that we have encountered to
further improve the generation pipeline. First, we would like to experiment and develop a novel
model to merge entity mentions that refer to the same entity (for example, in Table 4 Mr. Reagan
and President Reagan are not merged). Second, we would like to assign news into categories to
make it simple the explore both the news and the KG content. Finally, we intend to explore
additional datasets beyond Dow Jones Article dataset to enrich our analysis and validate the
ifndings across diferent sources, thereby enhancing the robustness and generalizability of our
research.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>We acknowledge financial support under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP),
Mission 4 Component 2 Investment 1.5 - Call for tender No.3277 published on December 30,
2021 by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR) funded by the European Union
– NextGenerationEU. Project Code ECS0000038 – Project Title eINS Ecosystem of Innovation
for Next Generation Sardinia – CUP F53C22000430001- Grant Assignment Decree No. 1056
adopted on June 23, 2022 by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR).
methodology for knowledge graph generation within the tourism domain, IEEE Access
(2023).
[11] M. Rizun, et al., Knowledge graph application in education: A literature review, Acta</p>
      <p>Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica 3 (2019) 7–19.
[12] A. Tchechmedjiev, P. Fafalios, K. Boland, M. Gasquet, M. Zloch, B. Zapilko, S. Dietze,
K. Todorov, Claimskg: A knowledge graph of fact-checked claims, in: The Semantic
Web–ISWC 2019: 18th International Semantic Web Conference, Auckland, New Zealand,
October 26–30, 2019, Proceedings, Part II 18, Springer, 2019, pp. 309–324.
[13] A. Meloni, S. Angioni, A. Salatino, F. Osborne, D. R. Recupero, E. Motta, Integrating
conversational agents and knowledge graphs within the scholarly domain, Ieee Access 11
(2023) 22468–22489.
[14] T. M. Nguyen, H.-W. Chun, M. Hwang, L.-N. Kwon, J.-M. Lee, K. Park, J. J. Jung, Sociopedia+:
a visual analytics system for social knowledge graph-based event exploration, PeerJ
Computer Science 9 (2023) e1277.
[15] S. Angioni, A. Salatino, F. Osborne, A. Birukou, D. R. Recupero, E. Motta, Leveraging
knowledge graph technologies to assess journals and conferences at springer nature, in:
International Semantic Web Conference, Springer, 2022, pp. 735–752.
[16] A. ZEKIYE, A. ALPKOCAK, Extracting and analyzing covid-19-related entities and
relationships: A knowledge graph approach, in: Proceedings of 14th Turkish Congress of
Medical Informatics, volume 16, 2023.
[17] D. Dessí, R. Dessí, Diving into knowledge graphs for patents: Open challenges and benefits
(2022).
[18] P. Manghi, A. Mannocci, F. Osborne, D. Sacharidis, A. Salatino, T. Vergoulis, New trends in
scientific knowledge graphs and research impact assessment, 2021.
[19] F. Al-Obeidat, O. Adedugbe, A. B. Hani, E. Benkhelifa, M. Majdalawieh, Cone-kg: A
semantic knowledge graph with news content and social context for studying
covid19 news articles on social media, in: 2020 Seventh International Conference on Social
Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS), 2020, pp. 1–7. doi:10.1109/
SNAMS52053.2020.9336541.
[20] S. Gangopadhyay, K. Boland, D. Dessí, S. Dietze, P. Fafalios, A. Tchechmedjiev, K. Todorov,</p>
      <p>H. Jabeen, Truth or dare: Investigating claims truthfulness with claimskg (2023).
[21] D. Liu, T. Bai, J. Lian, G. Sun, W. X. Zhao, J. rong Wen, X. Xie, News graph: An enhanced
knowledge graph for news recommendation, in: KaRS@CIKM, 2019. URL: https://api.
semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:204777685.
[22] M. Rospocher, M. Van Erp, P. Vossen, A. Fokkens, I. Aldabe, G. Rigau, A. Soroa, T. Ploeger,
T. Bogaard, Building event-centric knowledge graphs from news, Journal of Web Semantics
37 (2016) 132–151.
[23] L. Fu, H. Peng, S. Liu, Kg-mfend: an eficient knowledge graph-based model for
multidomain fake news detection, The Journal of Supercomputing (2023) 1–28.
[24] A. L. Opdahl, T. Al-Moslmi, D.-T. Dang-Nguyen, M. Gallofré Ocaña, B. Tessem, C. Veres,
Semantic knowledge graphs for the news: A review, ACM Comput. Surv. 55 (2022). URL:
https://doi.org/10.1145/3543508. doi:10.1145/3543508.
[25] D. Dessí, F. Osborne, D. R. Recupero, D. Buscaldi, E. Motta, Scicero: A deep learning and
nlp approach for generating scientific knowledge graphs in the computer science domain,</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[1] LISI, UK and EU - An analysis of ESG reporting requirements and trends</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Technical Report</source>
          ,
          <year>2023</year>
          . URL: https://www.lisi-law.eu/resources/ uk-and
          <article-title>-eu-an-analysis-of-esg-reporting-requirements-and-trends.</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. L.</given-names>
            <surname>Opdahl</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Al-Moslmi</surname>
          </string-name>
          , D.-
          <string-name>
            <surname>T.</surname>
            Dang-Nguyen,
            <given-names>M. Gallofré</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ocaña</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tessem</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Veres</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Semantic knowledge graphs for the news: A review</article-title>
          ,
          <source>ACM Comput. Surv</source>
          .
          <volume>55</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ). URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3543508. doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1145/3543508.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Tan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Paul</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S. Yamaura,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Koji</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S.
          <article-title>-</article-title>
          K. Ng,
          <article-title>Constructing and interpreting causal knowledge graphs from news</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2023</year>
          . arXiv:
          <volume>2305</volume>
          .
          <fpage>09359</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Peng</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Xia</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Naseriparsa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Osborne</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Knowledge graphs: opportunities and challenges</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Artificial Intelligence Review</source>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>32</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Dessì</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Osborne</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Recupero</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Buscaldi</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. Motta,
          <article-title>Generating knowledge graphs by employing natural language processing and machine learning techniques within the scholarly domain</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Future Generation Computer Systems</source>
          <volume>116</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>253</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>264</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Nayyeri</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Cil</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Vahdati</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Osborne</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Rahman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Angioni</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Salatino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Recupero</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Vassilyeva</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Motta</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Trans4e: Link prediction on scholarly knowledge graphs</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Neurocomputing</source>
          <volume>461</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>530</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>542</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Dessí</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Osborne</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. Reforgiato</given-names>
            <surname>Recupero</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Buscaldi</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. Motta,
          <article-title>Cs-kg: A large-scale knowledge graph of research entities and claims in computer science</article-title>
          , in: International Semantic Web Conference, Springer,
          <year>2022</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>678</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>696</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Angioni</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Salatino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Osborne</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Recupero</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. Motta,
          <article-title>Aida: A knowledge graph about research dynamics in academia and industry</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Quantitative Science Studies</source>
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>1356</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1398</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Michel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Gandon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Ah-Kane</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Bobasheva</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Cabrio</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Corby</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Gazzotti</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Giboin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Marro</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Mayer</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Covid-on-the-web: Knowledge graph and services to advance covid-19 research, in: The Semantic Web-ISWC</article-title>
          <year>2020</year>
          : 19th International Semantic Web Conference, Athens, Greece, November 2-
          <issue>6</issue>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          , Proceedings,
          <source>Part II 19</source>
          , Springer,
          <year>2020</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>294</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>310</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Chessa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Fenu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Motta</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Osborne</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Recupero</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Salatino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Secchi</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Data-driven
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>