<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1613-0073</issn>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Bridging the Innovation Gap: Leveraging Patent Information for Scientists by Constructing a Patent-centric Knowledge Graph</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Hidir Aras</string-name>
          <email>hidir.aras@fiz-karlsruhe.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Rima Dessi</string-name>
          <email>rima.dessi@fiz-karlsruhe.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Farag Saad</string-name>
          <email>farag.saad@fiz-karlsruhe.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Lei Zhang</string-name>
          <email>lei.zhang@fiz-karlsruhe.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="editor">
          <string-name>Patent Knowledge, LOD, Entity Linking, Named Entity Recognition, Domain-specific Knowledge</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>FIZ Karlsruhe</institution>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The purpose of patents is to allow companies and individuals to disclose inventions and legally protect intellectual property. Despite their recognition as a crucial source of scientific and technical knowledge in industrial contexts, the use of patent information by scientists remains low. Research surveys have identified several key barriers that hinder the efective use of patents by the scientific community. These include the complexity of the patent information landscape, characterized by domain-specific terminology and the extensive and varied nature of content. Additionally, challenges in accessing and comprehending patent knowledge further discourage widespread use among researchers. To address these issues, it is crucial to improve the integration of relevant information sources. Enhancing the interlinking of related objects and focusing on the targeted extraction of pertinent sections from patent documents through the use of semantic information derived from knowledge graphs (KG) could significantly ease the process. In this paper, we present our eforts to construct a Patent Knowledge Graph (PKG) by annotating, linking and integrating essential knowledge from patent text with scientific literature and domain-specific knowledge by leveraging semantics from the Linked Open Data (LOD) cloud and domainspecific ontologies for several scientific domains. Such advancements would enable scientists to more efectively access and leverage the essential information that is often concealed within patents.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>CEUR
ceur-ws.org</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Patents contain important scientific and technical information and serve as an important
source for innovations in the field of intellectual property and related industries. Though
their informational value is widely acknowledged, their actual use in non-industrial settings
among scientists is rather low. The findings from several surveys [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref2">1, 2</xref>
        ] indicate that the
complexity of the information space, such as domain-specific vocabulary, the large amount of
heterogeneous content with mixed domains and eficiency constraints for accessing and using
patent information are the biggest obstacles. This fact also poses several challenges for the
integration of such diverse knowledge for the application of AI systems. In order to overcome
these challenges, interlinking patent information with scientific literature and domain-specific
information sources by converting relevant textual content into a semantic representation can
be regarded as important steps for enhancing the understandability and use of patent knowledge.
In this paper, we describe a novel approach for forming a patent-centric KG based on explicit
semantic information (entities) from large-scale KGs in the LOD cloud, e.g. Wikidata, and
domain-specific knowledge bases. First, we extract the relevant conceptual knowledge for
the regarded domains from Wikidata in order to enrich (annotate) and link patents, scientific
literature and domain-specific sources. In order to link such explicit knowledge with relevant
textual parts in patent text, we employ named entity recognition (NER) for the reliable detection
of entity mentions. Our PKG is based on an extended ontological model for representing core
information in patent documents and its fulltext. Beside semantic knowledge from the LOD
cloud we exploit additional conceptual knowledge from domain-specific ontologies, e.g. for the
plasma technology or material science and engineering domains. Herewith our approach allows
to answer complex semantic queries/research questions of scientists, e.g. related to plasma
medicine such as ”Which patents describe a plasma source that can be used for decontamination
of room air and produces a plasma with virucidal eficacy? ”
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>2. Related Work</title>
      <p>
        In the literature, patent documents firstly were encoded as LOD in the work of [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. In the
same year, the meta-data (incl. bibliographic data) of all EP patents since 1978 has been made
available as “Linked open EP data” by the European Patent Ofice (EPO) comprising several
millions of triples freely available with open license. The underlying semantic data model
was described by [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. The usage of a knowledge-based approach for patent retrieval from
multiple sources was presented earlier by [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], where U.S. patents, court litigations, scientific
publications and domain-specific information from the biomedical technology domain were
covered. A first knowledge infrastructure that used Semantic Web standards to enable semantic
interoperability for drug discovery was presented in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ], the authors describe their
approach of interlinking datasets from SciGraph and DBpedia using link discovery and named
entity recognition (NER). Furtermore, semantic modeling of domain-specific knowledge for the
plasma technology (PT) was researched in the QPTDat project1, where a PT ontology serves
as a basis for construction a KG for plasma research data based on the Plasma-MDS schema
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ] in its core. In the work of [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] the PMD Core Ontology (PMDco) builds a foundation for
domain-specific ontology development in the material science and engineering (MSE) domains.
Herewith, data interoperability for the diverse material science domains following FAIR and
LOD standards can be established. To the best of our knowledge, there is currently no existing
research focused on providing in-depth semantic access to interlinked patent information. Our
approach aims to integrate patent data with scientific literature and domain-specific knowledge
bases using established Semantic Web standards, along with LOD and FAIR data principles.
This integration will enhance the accessibility and utility of patent knowledge, connecting it
more efectively with relevant academic and industry resources.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>3. A Patent-centric Knowledge Graph Model</title>
      <p>A semantic representation of patent knowledge involves creating a comprehensive and adaptable
model that clearly defines the structure and components of a patent. Such a model aims to
facilitate the enrichment of crucial textual content from patents by adding meaning and context,
hence, making it easier to integrate with external scientific and domain-specific knowledge
bases. By systematically enhancing and linking this content semantically, the model allows
for a deeper and more efective connection between patent information and relevant external
resources. Together with the core semantic model of a patent incl. meta-data and its (linked)
entity annotations, we form a patent-centric KG, allowing us to answer research questions such
as the aforementioned one, expressed as semantic queries in SPARQL.</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>3.1. The Patent4Science Ontology</title>
        <p>The ontology behind the PKG consists of classes and properties that are tailored to a semantic
representation of an enriched (and structured) patent document. The current version
encompasses 19 classes, 21 object properties (semantic relations), and 47 datatype properties. Figure 1
illustrates the compact overview of the ontology.</p>
        <p>In a first step, patent documents belonging to the PT, AM and BM domains are collected from
the several professional patent databases. Then the PKG is formed by structuring and encoding
patent metadata (e.g., patent’s application, number, classification code, publication date, etc.) in
the Resource Description Framework (RDF) using the specified ontological model. Each patent
is represented as an instance of :Patent class and the properties are also utilized to depict the
patent’s metadata. Typically, a patent belongs to a patent family which consists of multiple
patent applications related to the same invention. Additionally, we model the corresponding
patent publication in a dedicated class :Publication and its textual content, i.e., the textual
content of each patent is associated with an instance of the class :FullText which consists of
patent sections (i.e., abstract, claim, description).</p>
        <p>These are instances of the :PatentSection class. Each section (or even paragraph) is enriched
(annotated) with the domain-specific entities sourced from Wikidata (see Section 4.3), enabling
a connection to the LOD cloud. These annotations are then linked to the corresponding patent
publication instances in the PKG with the help of the :hasAnnotation property. In this way,
annotations of each section and their paragraphs are easily accessible which helps advanced
analysis of the patent knowledge. To further augment the PKG, relevant scientific literature
sourced from OpenAlex2 is linked to each patent publication based on their relevancy score (see
Section 4.4) with the :hasLink property. Overall, this graph captures the relations between
various elements, including patent publications, their entity annotations, related scientific
publications, and more. In the example fragment shown in Figure 2, the textual content of
the patent ”DE-102005024472-B4” was annotated with the Wikidata entities Q10251 (plasma),
Q7391292 (air) and Q17008689 (decontamination) and linked to the scientific literature work
W2063843145 from OpenAlex by calculating shared entities Q10251, Q17008689. In a similar
way, further domain-specific knowledge bases for each of the aforementioned domains can be
integrated and linked in the PKG employing the approaches described in the next chapter.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>4. Linking Domain Knowledge and Scientific Literature</title>
      <p>Large-scale KGs like Wikidata contain general and specific forms of explicit semantic information
(conceptual entities and their relations) that can be used to enrich domain-specific information
sources such as for plasma technology or material science. One way to extract relevant entities
from Wikidata is to make use of Wikipedia categories for each domain to be covered. To link
relevant explicit knowledge from such external large-scale KGs, mentions of entities in patent
text must be identified employing rule-based or machine learning methods. Identifying such
entities in patent text is not a trivial task due to many factors such as the complexity of the
semantic structures of the entities, fuzzy entity boundaries, abundant use of synonyms, hyphens,
digits, characters, and ambiguous abbreviations, etc. Therefore, we employ entity recognition
and entity linking for the semantic annotation and disambiguation of patent knowledge. Hereby,
links to relevant scientific literature can be established based on shared entities in patent text
and scientific article. In a similar way, we link conceptual knowledge from a domain-specific
KG e.g. for the plasma technology domain utilizing shared conceptual knowledge.</p>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>4.1. Domain-specific Named Entity Recognition and Classification</title>
        <p>
          A central part of creating a PKG is to automatically identify named entities in the patent text.
These named entities will be used as part of the PKG creation and linking. The aim of NER is to
determine entity mentions, i.e., which terms in patent text might refer to an entity. In addition,
we also classify these entity mentions into pre-defined entity types, such as ’plasma source’ in
the domain of plasma technology. There are some well-known existing tools for named entity
recognition and classification, e.g. Stanford NER 3 and OpenNLP4. While these tools can deal
with general text and entity types very well, they are not suitable for domain-specific patent text.
Therefore, we have developed a NER model customized for patent text by applying a Bi-LSTM
deep neural network [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ], which has been originally designed for the biomedical domain and
extended to other scientific domains in this work, e.g., plasma technology.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-2">
        <title>4.2. Extraction of Domain-specific Entities</title>
        <p>To enrich the PKG based on external knowledge, we use Wikidata as our major external KG
from the LOD cloud. The reason we choose Wikidata is due to the fact that patents generally
cover a wide range of topics and Wikidata is a quite comprehensive KG that contains millions
of entities in many domains. However, for a specific target domain, e.g., plasma technology, a
large number of entities in Wikidata might not be needed. Therefore, we extract only entities
that are related to the target domains by exploiting relevant Wikipedia categories, which are
used to link articles under a common topic so that all categories form a hierarchy. Based on
that, we firstly extracted Wikipedia articles from the given categories, e.g., Plasma_physics5.
3https://nlp.stanford.edu/software/CRF-NER.shtml
4https://opennlp.apache.org/
5https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Plasma_physics</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-3">
        <title>4.3. Domain-specific Entity Linking</title>
        <p>
          To enrich the PKG with domain-specific entity annotations, we apply entity linking (mention
detection and entity disambiguation) to annotate patent texts with the Wikidata entities
extracted for each target domain. For mention detection, we firstly rely on the named entities
detected by the domain-specific NER described in 4.1. In addition, we use another POS tagging
based method [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ] to detect all noun phrases in patent texts that match against any labels of
the extracted domain entities for the target domains. For all these mentions detected by both
methods, their candidate entities are then extracted based on entity labels from Wikidata. After
that, entity disambiguation aims to map ambiguous entity mentions onto entities from Wikidata,
where we use an entity disambiguation method based on the PageRank algorithm. In addition,
we compute a confidence score for each entity link. We firstly assign an entity-mention score
for each candidate entity, which represents how often a mention is used to refer to the candidate
entity, and based on that we re-weight each entity link using the PageRank algorithm and the
ifnal scores are normalized by the maximal score of all links in a patent text [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ].
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-4">
        <title>4.4. Scientific Literature Linking</title>
        <p>In order to integrate and link scientific literature in the PKG, we utilize OpenAlex 6, a free and
open catalog of the world’s scholarly publications, which contains extensive metadata across
scientific works, authors, publication venues, institutions, and concepts. It indexes over 240M
works, which are scholarly documents like papers, journal articles, books and theses. These
works are linked to more than 65,000 concepts, which are entities from Wikidata. Since the PKG
focuses on specific target domains, we collect OpenAlex works using the previously extracted
entities for each of the target domain. In other words, only the OpenAlex works that are linked
with these extracted and annotated entities in patent text are considered. Hence, we create
links between patents and scientific literature from OpenAlex based on their shared Wikidata
entities. More specifically, for each patent in a target domain, we use the domain entities linked
with this patent generated by the entity linking step to search for the works from OpenAlex
that are also linked with the same domain entities, and once the number of common entities
linked with the patent and a work exceeds a threshold (i.e., 5 chosen in this work based on a
manual comparison of the results), we create a link between the patent and the work.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>5. Summary and Outlook</title>
      <p>In this paper, we have described our approach to building a patent-centric KG based on a
semantic data model of patents that is enriched and linked by using explicit semantics from
external KGs. Hereby, we used domain-specific semantics from the PT and MSE domains to
annotate and link patent knowledge with scientific literature and domain-specific knowledge
sources. At the current state, knowledge integration in the PKG is based on Wikidata entities
shared between patents, scientific literature, and other domain-specific sources. In the future,
we will use and integrate explicit semantics from dedicated knowledge bases for selected target
domains. By exploiting semantics from their underlying domain-specific ontologies such as
the PTO7 or PMDCo8, we will enable a more consistent coverage of patent knowledge for the
benefit of applications for patent retrieval and analysis.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>6. Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This work was partly funded by the DFG project Patents4Science9, Project id: 496963457.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Hassan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Lehmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A linked open data representation of patents registered in the us from 2005-2017</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Scientific</given-names>
            <surname>Data</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Senger</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Assessment of the significance of patent-derived information for the early identification of compound-target interaction hypotheses</article-title>
          ,
          <source>J. of Cheminformatics</source>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Kracker</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>European patent information and the cpc taxonomy as linked open data</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of the Posters and Demos Track of the Semantics 2018 Conference</source>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Taduri</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G. T.</given-names>
            <surname>Lau</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K. H.</given-names>
            <surname>Law</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
            <surname>Kesan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A patent system ontology for facilitating retrieval of patent related information, Association for Computing Machinery</article-title>
          , New York, NY, USA,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Williams</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Harland</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Groth</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Pettifer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Chichester</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. L.</given-names>
            <surname>Willighagen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C. T.</given-names>
            <surname>Evelo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Blomberg</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Ecker,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Goble</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Mons</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Open phacts: semantic interoperability for drug discovery</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Drug Discovery Today</source>
          <volume>17</volume>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
          <fpage>1188</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1198</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Yaman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Pasin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Freudenberg</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Interlinking scigraph and dbpedia datasets using link discovery and named entity recognition techniques</article-title>
          , in: M.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Eskevich</surname>
            , G. de Melo,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fäth</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>McCrae</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Buitelaar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chiarcos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Klimek</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M. Dojchinovski (Eds.),
          <source>2nd Conference on Language, Data and Knowledge,LDK 2019, May 20-23</source>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          , Leipzig, Germany, volume
          <volume>70</volume>
          of OASIcs,
          <source>Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</source>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          , pp.
          <volume>15</volume>
          :
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>15</lpage>
          :
          <fpage>8</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Franke</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Paulet</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Schäfer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>D. O'Connell</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Becker</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Plasma-mds, a metadata schema for plasma science with examples from plasma technology</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Scientific Data</source>
          <volume>7</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>439</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Bayerlein</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Schilling</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Birkholz</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Jung</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Waitelonis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Mädler</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Sack</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Pmd core ontology: Achieving semantic interoperability in materials science</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Materials Design</source>
          <volume>237</volume>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          )
          <fpage>112603</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Saad</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Aras</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Hackl-Sommer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Improving named entity recognition for biomedical and patent data using bi-lstm deep neural network models</article-title>
          , in: E.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Métais</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Meziane</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Horacek</surname>
          </string-name>
          , P. Cimiano (Eds.),
          <source>NLDB 2020 - 25th Int. Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems</source>
          , Saarbrücken, Germany, June 24-26,
          <year>2020</year>
          , Proceedings, volume
          <volume>12089</volume>
          of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer,
          <year>2020</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>25</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>36</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Rettinger</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Philipp</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Context-aware entity disambiguation in text using markov chains</article-title>
          , in: 2016 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence,
          <string-name>
            <surname>WI</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2016</year>
          ,
          <article-title>Omaha</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>NE</surname>
          </string-name>
          , USA, October
          <volume>13</volume>
          -
          <issue>16</issue>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          , IEEE Computer Society,
          <year>2016</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>49</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>56</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Rettinger</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>X-lisa: Cross-lingual semantic annotation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Proc. VLDB Endow</source>
          .
          <volume>7</volume>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <fpage>1693</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1696</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>