<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Multi-Agent System for Facility Location Problem</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Sathuta Sellapperuma</string-name>
          <email>sathuta.sellapperuma@mif.stud.vu.lt</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Institute of Data Science and Digital Technologies, Vilnius University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Akademijos St. 4, Vilnius</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="LT">Lithuania</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>127</fpage>
      <lpage>136</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Effective facility location decisions are pivotal for enhancing a firm's performance and competitive edge. Traditional methods often struggle to adapt to dynamic market conditions, leading to suboptimal outcomes. This research proposes a novel Multi-Agent System (MAS) application to address the Facility Location Problem (FLP). By leveraging distributed decisionmaking agents, the MAS platform aims to optimize facility locations in real time, integrating dynamic factors such as evolving consumer preferences and market trends. This study will design, implement, and evaluate an MAS platform where agents representing stakeholderscustomers, suppliers, and facilities-interact to find optimal locations, considering cost minimization, customer satisfaction, and competitive advantage. The MAS framework also incorporates advanced decision-making algorithms and optimization techniques to enhance the efficiency and robustness of the solution. The system's adaptability to market changes and realtime data integration capabilities will be thoroughly assessed through comprehensive evaluation metrics. The anticipated outcomes include improved decision-making efficiency, enhanced adaptability to market changes, and a robust solution capable of mitigating market cannibalization effects. Ultimately, this research aims to provide a practical and scalable approach to facility location optimization, fostering long-term organizational success in a competitive global environment.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Multi-agent system</kwd>
        <kwd>facility location problem</kwd>
        <kwd>agent base FLP</kwd>
        <kwd>FLP optimization with MAS 1</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Effective facility location decisions are crucial for firms, influencing their performance,
growth, and competitive edge in the market. The overall goals of increasing market share
while reducing the negative consequences of market cannibalization guide the selection of
appropriate locations for factories, service outlets, and warehouses. Market
cannibalization, stemming from introducing new facilities, poses a significant concern,
resulting in revenue decline and operational challenges for existing sites. Despite
advancements, one unresolved research area lies in efficiently integrating dynamic factors
such as changing consumer preferences and market trends into facility location decisions.
Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) present a compelling solution to this challenge by leveraging
distributed decision-making agents to optimize facility location tasks. MAS excels in
handling complex, dynamic environments by facilitating collaboration among diverse
agents with unique objectives, thus enabling more adaptive and informed decision-making
processes in facility location optimization.</p>
      <p>
        Research in facility location optimization is crucial due to evolving business operations,
dynamic market conditions, and technological advancements. Current methods often fail
to incorporate real-time data and dynamic variables, leading to less-than-ideal results.
Innovative solutions combining market intelligence, data analytics, and optimization can
improve response, capitalize on opportunities, and reduce risks. Moreover, such
advancements in facility location research hold the potential to revolutionize supply chain
management, logistics operations, and overall business performance, thereby contributing
to the strategic resilience and sustainability of organizations in today's fast-paced global
marketplace [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Research in facility location optimization is crucial for businesses' competitiveness,
profitability, and sustainability. Addressing knowledge gaps and challenges will enable
firms to adapt to market conditions and customer demands. Innovative methodologies
and decision-support systems will integrate real-time data, predictive analytics, and
optimization algorithms for optimal facility locations. Overall, the completion of this
research holds the promise of revolutionizing how businesses approach facility location
decisions, fostering strategic agility, and fostering long-term success in an increasingly
competitive global landscape [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Literature Review and Related Work</title>
      <p>Literature studies on the facility location problem domain indicated multiple criteria and
uncertainty over traditional methods within several gaps or unsolved situations. This
section has summarized some of the studies and literature contrasting some of the main
problematic states and how those situations are still available and unsolved. Same way
how the multi-agent system could integrate to fill these gaps with related works and
solutions indicated below. Moreover, the problem has been extensively studied in the
literature, and various solution approaches have been proposed, including exact methods,
heuristics, and metaheuristics. However, the problem remains challenging, especially
when dealing with large-scale instances or complex constraints.</p>
      <p>
        The facility location problem is a fundamental problem in operations research and
management science, which involves determining the optimal location of facilities to serve
a set of customers or demand points. Traditional methods are often static and do not take
into account the dynamic nature of the problem. One of the unsolved gaps in the literature
is the lack of effective solution methods for dynamic facility location problems, where the
demand points or the facilities themselves are subject to changes over time. Multi-agent
systems (MAS) have been proposed as a promising approach to tackle dynamic facility
location problems, as they can model the interactions between different agents and adapt
to changes in the environment. However, there is a need for further research on how to
design and implement effective MAS for dynamic facility location problems [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The study by X. Gao et al. provides valuable insights into optimizing facility locations in
a continuous-space setting. However, it lacks a comprehensive exploration of the impact of
market dynamics, such as market cannibalization, on facility location decisions.
Additionally, the study does not delve into the utilization of MAS to address the real-time
data flow challenges and the need for adaptive decision-making in facility location
optimization, which are crucial aspects highlighted in the proposed MAS solution for this
study [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Another important related work study indicates a multi-agent Agent-based solution
Reactive Approach to Facility Location over the transport Application. But considering
evolving market dynamics, competitor factors will be addressed with this research study
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Moarref et al. research study on facility location optimization using multi-agent robotic
systems presents distributed, asynchronous, and scalable algorithms for continuous
nmedian problem. However, it lacks exploration of uncertainty and dynamic factors in
facility location decisions. The study offers an extreme solution for addressing uncertainty
factors in MAS solutions. Same as above it is another important need to incorporate
uncertainty modeling techniques and dynamic optimization strategies within MAS
frameworks for facility location, this study could contribute significantly to addressing the
practical complexities faced by businesses in real-world scenarios [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The paper "A Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework for
Resource Balancing in Complex Logistics Network" addresses the challenges faced by
traditional operational research methods in resource balancing within logistics networks,
such as the uncertainty of future supply and demand (SnD) and the complexity of business
rules that are difficult to model accurately. By introducing a novel cooperative multi-agent
reinforcement learning (MARL) framework, the study aims to bridge the gap between
traditional OR solutions and the complexities of real-world logistics networks. While the
MARL framework shows promise in enhancing cooperation among resource agents, future
research could explore the scalability and robustness of the approach in larger logistics
networks and investigate the impact of different cooperative metrics and reward
mechanisms on optimizing cooperation strategies in resource-balancing scenarios [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Some studies explored the use of neural networks to design strategy-proof mechanisms
for multi-facility location problems, aiming to minimize expected social costs [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. Further,
this paper clearly indicates how machine learning framework and optimization
parameters are adopted with social cost situations within a multi-agent system context.
So, this research contributes to the development of flexible and practical approaches for
designing general mechanisms without the use of payments over novel solutions using
deep learning techniques. However, compared to the single-facility solution scenarios
there is a problem of limited Understanding of Multi-Facility Settings. One major reason
for the above because of a lack of a solution to perform collaborative decisions among the
agents.
      </p>
      <p>
        Considering the above all existing kinds of literature it is clear that the integration of
risk analysis methodologies and adaptive decision-making processes within MAS for
facility location problems could enhance the robustness and adaptability of the proposed
solution. Moreover, by bridging this gap and focusing on uncertainty and dynamic aspects,
the proposed research study could offer a more comprehensive and practical approach to
optimizing facility locations in dynamic and uncertain environments [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>The facility location problem is a complex issue requiring multiple criteria and
uncertainty. Traditional methods are static and do not consider the dynamic nature of the
problem. Multi-agent systems (MAS) are proposed as a promising approach, but further
research is needed to design and implement effective MAS for dynamic problems. MAS
solutions use reactive multiagent models, but do not address uncertainties and dynamic
environments.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Research Problem, Questions and Objectives</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>3.1. Research Problem</title>
        <p>As the literature studies indicate operational management area is a big challenge faced in
facility location decisions, particularly in dynamic and uncertain environments.
Traditional operational research methods often struggle to adapt to changing demand
patterns, fluctuating transportation conditions, and evolving market dynamics, leading to
suboptimal facility location solutions. The facility location problem involves determining
the optimal location of facilities to serve a set of customers or demand points. A significant
knowledge gap exists in effectively integrating real-time data and dynamic variables into
the facility location decision-making process.</p>
        <p>Another main consideration is how it could able to give practical solutions to integrate
stakeholders who need solutions over FLP into the MAS environment. There is a need to
gather real-time data on the FLP for MAS agents as well as predictive and generated
results and decisions would be important to stakeholders as well. This would be an
important objective of this study.</p>
        <p>Furthermore, the lack of effective solution methods for dynamic facility location
problems, where demand points or facilities undergo changes over time, underscores the
necessity for innovative approaches that can handle real-time data flow challenges and
enable adaptive decision-making processes are deal with existing situations</p>
        <p>This problem is fundamental in operations research and management science, and
various solution approaches have been proposed, including exact methods, heuristics, and
metaheuristics. However, the problem remains challenging, especially when dealing with
large-scale instances or complex constraints. The lack of effective solution methods for
dynamic facility location problems, where the demand points or the facilities themselves
are subject to changes over time, is a significant knowledge gap in the literature.</p>
        <p>Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) offer a promising approach by leveraging distributed
decision-making capabilities to optimize facility location tasks in these complex
environments. . However, there is a need for further research on designing and
implementing an effective MAS framework that can handle the dynamic and competitive
nature of real-world facility location problems.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>3.2. Research Questions</title>
        <p>Main Research Question:</p>
        <p>How can a Multi-Agent System (MAS) be optimized to effectively address facility
location problems, considering factors such as cost minimization, customer
satisfaction, and competitive advantage?</p>
        <p>This involves developing a dynamic and adaptive MAS platform that leverages
realtime data and optimization techniques to make informed, efficient, and competitive facility
location decisions. Further, this research study seeks to explore and develop an MAS
platform where multiple agents, representing various stakeholders like customers,
suppliers, and facilities, interact and negotiate to find optimal facility locations. The above
could be able to succeed by incorporating real-time data, advanced optimization
algorithms, and adaptive decision-making strategies, the aim is to create a robust system
that dynamically adjusts to changing conditions and achieves the best possible outcomes
in terms of cost efficiency, customer service, and market competitiveness.</p>
        <p>The above main research question could be derived into several as indicated below.
1. How can a MAS application be designed and implemented to effectively solve
important facility location problems, considering factors such as cost minimization,
customer satisfaction, competitive advantage, and integrating stakeholders of FLP
into MAS to get mutual benefits?</p>
        <p>A MAS architecture for facility location problems should be designed to integrate
multiple autonomous agents that represent different stakeholders, such as customers,
suppliers, facilities, etc. These agents should communicate and negotiate to optimize
facility locations based on factors like cost, customer satisfaction, and competitive
advantage. Further MAS would generate successful and effective decisions if the real-time
FLP data could be to it as well as it is important to get benefits to all important parties of
the FLP stakeholders.</p>
        <p>2. What agent architectures and communication protocols are most suitable for
solving FLPs within the MAS solution, and how can they be optimized to enhance
decision-making efficiency and coordination among agents?</p>
        <p>For solving facility location problems within a MAS, agent architectures like
decentralized and distributed systems can be used. Communication protocols like
message passing and negotiation can be optimized through techniques like machine
learning and data analytics to enhance decision-making efficiency and coordination among
agents. This should be practically tested and proven during the research study.</p>
        <p>3. What evaluation metrics should be defined to comprehensively assess the
performance of the MAS solution in addressing facility location problems, including
factors like cost reduction, customer satisfaction, and profitability enhancement?</p>
        <p>Evaluation metrics for assessing the performance of a MAS solution in facility location
problems should include metrics like cost reduction, customer satisfaction, and
profitability enhancement. These metrics can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the
MAS solution in addressing facility location problems and to identify areas for
improvement.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>3.3. Research Objectives</title>
        <p>Enhance Facility Location Decision-Making Efficiency through a Multi-Agent System:
The MAS platform will integrate decision-making algorithms and optimization techniques
to enhance facility location solutions quality, enhancing efficiency and effectiveness in
addressing FLPs.</p>
        <p>Develop Appropriate Agent Architectures and Communication Protocols to Solve
FLP Issues: The study aims to identify agent architectures and communication protocols
for MAS solution to address facility location problems, and integrate stakeholders of FLP
for mutual benefits, addressing the literate gap in real-time data from dynamic
environments.</p>
        <p>Evaluate performances of the MAS application Addressing Facility Location
Challenges: The MAS framework's adaptive over-capacity approach, utilizing real-time
data and optimization techniques, can address challenges in competitive facility location
decisions, minimizing costs and maximizing efficiency.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Research Direction</title>
      <p>
        In the proposed research study, the objective is to develop an efficient MAS framework
tailored to address the challenges encountered in facility location decisions. The research
aims to optimize facility locations to minimize costs, maximize efficiency, and meet
various constraints while considering factors like cost minimization, customer
satisfaction, and competitive advantage [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Proposed Research Directions include four main steps:</p>
      <p>Dynamic Integration of Real-Time Data: The study aims to integrate real-time
market intelligence and dynamic variables into the MAS framework for facility location
optimization, enhancing decision-making processes.</p>
      <p>Cooperative Behaviors and Information Integrating among FLP stakeholders: The
FLP strategy aims to optimize facility locations and mitigate market cannibalization by
promoting cooperative behaviors and information-sharing among agents, integrating
stakeholders, and utilizing real-time data for decision-making.</p>
      <p>Design and Development of MAS Architectures: The study focuses on optimizing
agent architectures and communication protocols in a distributed system (MAS) solution,
utilizing machine learning and data analytics for enhanced performance.</p>
      <p>
        Evaluation Metrics and Performance Assessment: Evaluate MAS solution's
effectiveness in addressing facility location issues using metrics like cost reduction,
customer satisfaction, and profitability enhancement to identify areas for improvement.
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ] [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Research Methodology and Tools</title>
      <p>To fulfill the above research problem, questions, and objectives, several, suitable research
methods should encompass both qualitative and quantitative approaches, leveraging the
strengths of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) and optimization techniques. The following
research techniques are to be used.</p>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>5.1. Literature Review</title>
        <p>The literature review study gains a comprehensive understanding of the current state of
facility location problems (FLPs), multiagent system (MAS) frameworks, optimization
techniques, and relevant evaluation metrics through a systematic review of academic
journals, conference papers, books, industry reports, and other relevant sources.
Moreover, this method aims to identify knowledge gaps, theoretical foundations, and best
practices to inform the design and implementation of the MAS environment. The expected
outcome is to provide a detailed synthesis of the existing literature, which will guide
future research and practical applications in the field of FLPs using MAS frameworks.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-2">
        <title>5.2. Conceptual System Modeling and Simulation</title>
        <p>The Conceptual System Modeling and Simulation method aims to design a detailed MAS
application to address research problems. It uses agent-based modeling to define the
structure, roles, and interactions of agents and develops a robust MAS architecture with
decision-making algorithms and communication protocols tailored to facility location
problems. Initial simulations will be conducted.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-3">
        <title>5.3. Algorithm Development and Integration</title>
        <p>The MAS platform method integrates advanced decision-making algorithms and
optimization techniques, including genetic algorithms, swarm intelligence, and machine
learning, to optimize agent interactions and facility location decisions, resulting in an
optimized algorithm for efficient facility location decisions.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-4">
        <title>5.4. Agent Modeling, Development and Training</title>
        <p>Integrating agent training, modeling, and development into the research methods is
crucial for creating a robust Multi-Agent System (MAS).</p>
        <p>1. Agent-based modeling (ABM) and development:
The phase involves designing and developing a MAS application, defining agent roles and
interactions for stakeholders like customers, suppliers, and facilities. ABM tools and
platforms will be used, and a scalability and flexibility framework will be implemented,
resulting in a detailed application ready for integration, training, and testing.</p>
        <p>2. Agent training and learning algorithms:
This phase aims to improve agent decision-making through training and adaptive learning
using machine learning algorithms. Agents are trained using historical data, customer
preferences, and market trends, and continuously refined for optimal performance in
dynamic environments, resulting in informed, adaptive decisions.</p>
        <p>
          3. Simulation and scenario analysis (testing and validation):
The method tests and validates the MAS application by creating diverse scenarios, and
evaluating agent interactions, decision-making processes, and system performance.
Results will be measured using metrics like cost efficiency, customer satisfaction, and
competitive advantage, demonstrating the system's ability to handle real-world facility
location problems.[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ].
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. Discussion</title>
      <p>The proposed and ongoing study MAS framework for facility location optimization was
designed with a system architecture indicated in Figure 1. This diagram has developed
mainly through the outcome of the literature studies. Since the research gap indicated a
lack of existing knowledge gap and studies for dynamic solutions within competitive FLP
this system could able to provide the simulated solution. One of the main requirements is
to fill the literature gap with a real-time data-gathering strategy for this study. As per the
multistakeholder platform integration customers, delivery logistic staff, farmers, process
and manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers like all parties are integrating and nurturing
data to the MAS-FLP and will able to use real-time data for relevant agents of the MAS.</p>
      <p>The future works of this ongoing research study need to fulfill several important steps
to achieve the desired objectives. Investigation of facility location problems with their
situation is a major need for designing MAS for grabbed problematic situations. With the
design of the system, it may need to enhance consistency by discovering more practical
situations as well as existing literature. As the next step, this will be required to analyze
agent architecture with their skills and characteristics. The planning of the agent
integration and protocol arrangement will be parallel to the above step. With the
simulation and system development system testing would be required several indications
like Scenario Development, Performance Metrics. Sametime, to engage in Integration with
Real-World Data it required Stakeholder Engagement for testing and evaluation to be
successful.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>7. Conclusion</title>
      <p>This research addresses the critical need for innovative and adaptive approaches in
facility location optimization, driven by the dynamic and competitive nature of
contemporary markets. The proposed Multi-Agent System (MAS) offers a transformative
solution to the Facility Location Problem (FLP) by leveraging distributed decision-making
agents. These agents will be designed to optimize facility locations in real-time, effectively
integrating dynamic factors such as evolving consumer preferences, fluctuating market
trends, and technological advancements.</p>
      <p>By incorporating advanced decision-making algorithms and optimization techniques
within the MAS platform, this study aims to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of
facility location decisions. The development of appropriate agent architectures and
communication protocols will ensure optimal coordination and interaction among agents,
representing various stakeholders such as customers, suppliers, and facilities. This
integration is crucial for achieving mutual benefits and addressing the complexities of
FLPs in a dynamic environment.</p>
      <p>The research objectives focus on enhancing facility location decision-making efficiency,
developing robust MAS architectures, and integrating stakeholders to facilitate real-time
data flow and adaptive decision-making. Comprehensive evaluation metrics, including cost
reduction, customer satisfaction, and profitability enhancement, will be used to assess the
performance of the MAS interface. These metrics will ensure that the proposed solution
effectively addresses the challenges in facility location optimization, providing a practical
and scalable approach for businesses.</p>
      <p>Ultimately, this research contributes significantly to the field of operations research
and management science by offering a novel and adaptive MAS-based solution for facility
location optimization. The anticipated outcomes include improved market responsiveness,
operational efficiency, and competitive sustainability. One of the main advantages for both
corporate facilities and stakeholders such as customers is integration for mutual benefits.
By bridging the knowledge gaps and addressing the challenges of dynamic and uncertain
environments, this study holds the potential to revolutionize facility location strategies,
fostering strategic resilience and long-term success for organizations in the increasingly
competitive global landscape.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>“</given-names>
            <surname>Chraibi</surname>
          </string-name>
          et al.
          <article-title>- 2019 - A Multi-Agents System for Solving Facility Layout</article-title>
          .pdf.”
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Villegas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Palacios</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. L.</given-names>
            <surname>Medaglia</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Solution methods for the bi-objective (cost-coverage) unconstrained facility location problem with an illustrative example</article-title>
          ,
          <source>” Ann. Oper. Res.</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>147</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>1</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>109</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>141</lpage>
          , Oct.
          <year>2006</year>
          , doi: 10.1007/s10479-006- 0061-4.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Srinivasan</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Jain</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Eds.,
          <source>Innovations in Multi-Agent Systems and Applications - 1</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>310</volume>
          .
          <source>in Studies in Computational Intelligence</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>310</volume>
          . Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg,
          <year>2010</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/978-3-
          <fpage>642</fpage>
          -14435-6.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Gao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Park</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. Xie, G. Huang, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Globally Optimal Facility Locations for Continuous-Space Facility Location Problems</article-title>
          ,” Appl. Sci., vol.
          <volume>11</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>16</issue>
          , p.
          <fpage>7321</fpage>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Aug</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2021</year>
          , doi: 10.3390/app11167321.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Moujahed</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Simonin</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>A Reactive Agent Based Approach to Facility Location: Application to Transport”.</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Moarref</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Sayyaadi</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Facility Location Optimization via Multi-Agent Robotic Systems</article-title>
          ,” in 2008 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, Sanya, China: IEEE, Apr.
          <year>2008</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>287</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>292</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/ICNSC.
          <year>2008</year>
          .
          <volume>4525227</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J. Bian,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Tong</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and T.-Y. Liu, “
          <article-title>A Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework for Resource Balancing in Complex Logistics Network</article-title>
          .” arXiv, Mar.
          <volume>02</volume>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          . Accessed: Apr.
          <volume>08</volume>
          ,
          <year>2024</year>
          . [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/
          <year>1903</year>
          .00714
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Golowich</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Narasimhan</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Parkes</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Deep Learning for Multi-Facility Location Mechanism Design</article-title>
          ,”
          <source>in Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence</source>
          , Stockholm, Sweden:
          <source>International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization</source>
          , Jul.
          <year>2018</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>261</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>267</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .24963/ijcai.
          <year>2018</year>
          /36.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Chraibi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Kharraja</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I. H.</given-names>
            <surname>Osman</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Elbeqqali</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>A Multi-Agents System for Solving Facility Layout Problem: Application to Operating Theater,”</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Intell</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Syst., vol.
          <volume>28</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>4</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>601</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>619</lpage>
          , Sep.
          <year>2019</year>
          , doi: 10.1515/jisys-2017-0081.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Maliki</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Souier</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Dahane</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Ben</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abdelaziz</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>A multi-objective optimization model for a multi-period mobile facility location problem with environmental and disruption considerations</article-title>
          ,” Ann. Oper. Res.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sep</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2022</year>
          , doi: 10.1007/s10479-022- 04945-4.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Rabe</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Gonzalez-Feliu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Chicaiza-Vaca</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
            <surname>Tordecilla</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>SimulationOptimization Approach for Multi-Period Facility Location Problems with Forecasted and Random Demands in a Last-Mile Logistics Application,” Algorithms</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>14</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>2</issue>
          , p.
          <fpage>41</fpage>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jan</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2021</year>
          , doi: 10.3390/a14020041.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F. L.</given-names>
            <surname>Bellifemine</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Caire</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Greenwood</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Bellifemine</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. P. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Greenwood</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Developing multi-agent systems with JADE, Reprinted</article-title>
          . in Wiley series in agent technology.
          <source>Chichester: Wiley</source>
          ,
          <year>2008</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>