<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xml:space="preserve" xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kermitt2/grobid/master/grobid-home/schemas/xsd/Grobid.xsd"
 xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<teiHeader xml:lang="en">
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt>
				<title level="a" type="main">Multi-Agent System for Facility Location Problem</title>
			</titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher/>
				<availability status="unknown"><licence/></availability>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<biblStruct>
					<analytic>
						<author role="corresp">
							<persName><forename type="first">Sathuta</forename><surname>Sellapperuma</surname></persName>
							<email>sathuta.sellapperuma@mif.stud.vu.lt</email>
							<affiliation key="aff0">
								<orgName type="department">Institute of Data Science and Digital Technologies</orgName>
								<orgName type="institution">Vilnius University</orgName>
								<address>
									<addrLine>Akademijos St. 4</addrLine>
									<settlement>Vilnius</settlement>
									<country key="LT">Lithuania</country>
								</address>
							</affiliation>
						</author>
						<title level="a" type="main">Multi-Agent System for Facility Location Problem</title>
					</analytic>
					<monogr>
						<idno type="ISSN">1613-0073</idno>
					</monogr>
					<idno type="MD5">6B7BE7876F4549C39C7D38015CF5F31E</idno>
				</biblStruct>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<encodingDesc>
			<appInfo>
				<application version="0.7.2" ident="GROBID" when="2025-04-23T16:53+0000">
					<desc>GROBID - A machine learning software for extracting information from scholarly documents</desc>
					<ref target="https://github.com/kermitt2/grobid"/>
				</application>
			</appInfo>
		</encodingDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<textClass>
				<keywords>
					<term>Multi-agent system</term>
					<term>facility location problem</term>
					<term>agent base FLP</term>
					<term>FLP optimization with MAS 1</term>
				</keywords>
			</textClass>
			<abstract>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><p>Effective facility location decisions are pivotal for enhancing a firm's performance and competitive edge. Traditional methods often struggle to adapt to dynamic market conditions, leading to suboptimal outcomes. This research proposes a novel Multi-Agent System (MAS) application to address the Facility Location Problem (FLP). By leveraging distributed decisionmaking agents, the MAS platform aims to optimize facility locations in real time, integrating dynamic factors such as evolving consumer preferences and market trends. This study will design, implement, and evaluate an MAS platform where agents representing stakeholderscustomers, suppliers, and facilities-interact to find optimal locations, considering cost minimization, customer satisfaction, and competitive advantage. The MAS framework also incorporates advanced decision-making algorithms and optimization techniques to enhance the efficiency and robustness of the solution. The system's adaptability to market changes and realtime data integration capabilities will be thoroughly assessed through comprehensive evaluation metrics. The anticipated outcomes include improved decision-making efficiency, enhanced adaptability to market changes, and a robust solution capable of mitigating market cannibalization effects. Ultimately, this research aims to provide a practical and scalable approach to facility location optimization, fostering long-term organizational success in a competitive global environment.</p></div>
			</abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text xml:lang="en">
		<body>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="1.">Introduction</head><p>Effective facility location decisions are crucial for firms, influencing their performance, growth, and competitive edge in the market. The overall goals of increasing market share while reducing the negative consequences of market cannibalization guide the selection of appropriate locations for factories, service outlets, and warehouses. Market cannibalization, stemming from introducing new facilities, poses a significant concern, resulting in revenue decline and operational challenges for existing sites. Despite advancements, one unresolved research area lies in efficiently integrating dynamic factors such as changing consumer preferences and market trends into facility location decisions. Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) present a compelling solution to this challenge by leveraging distributed decision-making agents to optimize facility location tasks. MAS excels in handling complex, dynamic environments by facilitating collaboration among diverse agents with unique objectives, thus enabling more adaptive and informed decision-making processes in facility location optimization.</p><p>Research in facility location optimization is crucial due to evolving business operations, dynamic market conditions, and technological advancements. Current methods often fail to incorporate real-time data and dynamic variables, leading to less-than-ideal results. Innovative solutions combining market intelligence, data analytics, and optimization can improve response, capitalize on opportunities, and reduce risks. Moreover, such advancements in facility location research hold the potential to revolutionize supply chain management, logistics operations, and overall business performance, thereby contributing to the strategic resilience and sustainability of organizations in today's fast-paced global marketplace <ref type="bibr" target="#b0">[1]</ref>.</p><p>Research in facility location optimization is crucial for businesses' competitiveness, profitability, and sustainability. Addressing knowledge gaps and challenges will enable firms to adapt to market conditions and customer demands. Innovative methodologies and decision-support systems will integrate real-time data, predictive analytics, and optimization algorithms for optimal facility locations. Overall, the completion of this research holds the promise of revolutionizing how businesses approach facility location decisions, fostering strategic agility, and fostering long-term success in an increasingly competitive global landscape <ref type="bibr" target="#b1">[2]</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.">Literature Review and Related Work</head><p>Literature studies on the facility location problem domain indicated multiple criteria and uncertainty over traditional methods within several gaps or unsolved situations. This section has summarized some of the studies and literature contrasting some of the main problematic states and how those situations are still available and unsolved. Same way how the multi-agent system could integrate to fill these gaps with related works and solutions indicated below. Moreover, the problem has been extensively studied in the literature, and various solution approaches have been proposed, including exact methods, heuristics, and metaheuristics. However, the problem remains challenging, especially when dealing with large-scale instances or complex constraints.</p><p>The facility location problem is a fundamental problem in operations research and management science, which involves determining the optimal location of facilities to serve a set of customers or demand points. Traditional methods are often static and do not take into account the dynamic nature of the problem. One of the unsolved gaps in the literature is the lack of effective solution methods for dynamic facility location problems, where the demand points or the facilities themselves are subject to changes over time. Multi-agent systems (MAS) have been proposed as a promising approach to tackle dynamic facility location problems, as they can model the interactions between different agents and adapt to changes in the environment. However, there is a need for further research on how to design and implement effective MAS for dynamic facility location problems <ref type="bibr" target="#b2">[3]</ref>.</p><p>The study by X. Gao et al. provides valuable insights into optimizing facility locations in a continuous-space setting. However, it lacks a comprehensive exploration of the impact of market dynamics, such as market cannibalization, on facility location decisions. Additionally, the study does not delve into the utilization of MAS to address the real-time data flow challenges and the need for adaptive decision-making in facility location optimization, which are crucial aspects highlighted in the proposed MAS solution for this study <ref type="bibr" target="#b3">[4]</ref>.</p><p>Another important related work study indicates a multi-agent Agent-based solution Reactive Approach to Facility Location over the transport Application. But considering evolving market dynamics, competitor factors will be addressed with this research study <ref type="bibr" target="#b4">[5]</ref>.</p><p>Moarref et al. research study on facility location optimization using multi-agent robotic systems presents distributed, asynchronous, and scalable algorithms for continuous nmedian problem. However, it lacks exploration of uncertainty and dynamic factors in facility location decisions. The study offers an extreme solution for addressing uncertainty factors in MAS solutions. Same as above it is another important need to incorporate uncertainty modeling techniques and dynamic optimization strategies within MAS frameworks for facility location, this study could contribute significantly to addressing the practical complexities faced by businesses in real-world scenarios <ref type="bibr" target="#b5">[6]</ref>.</p><p>The paper "A Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework for Resource Balancing in Complex Logistics Network" addresses the challenges faced by traditional operational research methods in resource balancing within logistics networks, such as the uncertainty of future supply and demand (SnD) and the complexity of business rules that are difficult to model accurately. By introducing a novel cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) framework, the study aims to bridge the gap between traditional OR solutions and the complexities of real-world logistics networks. While the MARL framework shows promise in enhancing cooperation among resource agents, future research could explore the scalability and robustness of the approach in larger logistics networks and investigate the impact of different cooperative metrics and reward mechanisms on optimizing cooperation strategies in resource-balancing scenarios <ref type="bibr" target="#b6">[7]</ref>.</p><p>Some studies explored the use of neural networks to design strategy-proof mechanisms for multi-facility location problems, aiming to minimize expected social costs <ref type="bibr" target="#b7">[8]</ref>. Further, this paper clearly indicates how machine learning framework and optimization parameters are adopted with social cost situations within a multi-agent system context. So, this research contributes to the development of flexible and practical approaches for designing general mechanisms without the use of payments over novel solutions using deep learning techniques. However, compared to the single-facility solution scenarios there is a problem of limited Understanding of Multi-Facility Settings. One major reason for the above because of a lack of a solution to perform collaborative decisions among the agents.</p><p>Considering the above all existing kinds of literature it is clear that the integration of risk analysis methodologies and adaptive decision-making processes within MAS for facility location problems could enhance the robustness and adaptability of the proposed solution. Moreover, by bridging this gap and focusing on uncertainty and dynamic aspects, the proposed research study could offer a more comprehensive and practical approach to optimizing facility locations in dynamic and uncertain environments <ref type="bibr" target="#b8">[9]</ref>.</p><p>The facility location problem is a complex issue requiring multiple criteria and uncertainty. Traditional methods are static and do not consider the dynamic nature of the problem. Multi-agent systems (MAS) are proposed as a promising approach, but further research is needed to design and implement effective MAS for dynamic problems. MAS solutions use reactive multiagent models, but do not address uncertainties and dynamic environments.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.">Research Problem, Questions and Objectives</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.1.">Research Problem</head><p>As the literature studies indicate operational management area is a big challenge faced in facility location decisions, particularly in dynamic and uncertain environments. Traditional operational research methods often struggle to adapt to changing demand patterns, fluctuating transportation conditions, and evolving market dynamics, leading to suboptimal facility location solutions. The facility location problem involves determining the optimal location of facilities to serve a set of customers or demand points. A significant knowledge gap exists in effectively integrating real-time data and dynamic variables into the facility location decision-making process.</p><p>Another main consideration is how it could able to give practical solutions to integrate stakeholders who need solutions over FLP into the MAS environment. There is a need to gather real-time data on the FLP for MAS agents as well as predictive and generated results and decisions would be important to stakeholders as well. This would be an important objective of this study.</p><p>Furthermore, the lack of effective solution methods for dynamic facility location problems, where demand points or facilities undergo changes over time, underscores the necessity for innovative approaches that can handle real-time data flow challenges and enable adaptive decision-making processes are deal with existing situations This problem is fundamental in operations research and management science, and various solution approaches have been proposed, including exact methods, heuristics, and metaheuristics. However, the problem remains challenging, especially when dealing with large-scale instances or complex constraints. The lack of effective solution methods for dynamic facility location problems, where the demand points or the facilities themselves are subject to changes over time, is a significant knowledge gap in the literature.</p><p>Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) offer a promising approach by leveraging distributed decision-making capabilities to optimize facility location tasks in these complex environments. . However, there is a need for further research on designing and implementing an effective MAS framework that can handle the dynamic and competitive nature of real-world facility location problems.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.2.">Research Questions</head><p>Main Research Question:</p><p>How can a Multi-Agent System (MAS) be optimized to effectively address facility location problems, considering factors such as cost minimization, customer satisfaction, and competitive advantage?</p><p>This involves developing a dynamic and adaptive MAS platform that leverages realtime data and optimization techniques to make informed, efficient, and competitive facility location decisions. Further, this research study seeks to explore and develop an MAS platform where multiple agents, representing various stakeholders like customers, suppliers, and facilities, interact and negotiate to find optimal facility locations. The above could be able to succeed by incorporating real-time data, advanced optimization algorithms, and adaptive decision-making strategies, the aim is to create a robust system that dynamically adjusts to changing conditions and achieves the best possible outcomes in terms of cost efficiency, customer service, and market competitiveness.</p><p>The above main research question could be derived into several as indicated below.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="1.">How can a MAS application be designed and implemented to effectively solve important facility location problems, considering factors such as cost minimization, customer satisfaction, competitive advantage, and integrating stakeholders of FLP into MAS to get mutual benefits?</head><p>A MAS architecture for facility location problems should be designed to integrate multiple autonomous agents that represent different stakeholders, such as customers, suppliers, facilities, etc. These agents should communicate and negotiate to optimize facility locations based on factors like cost, customer satisfaction, and competitive advantage. Further MAS would generate successful and effective decisions if the real-time FLP data could be to it as well as it is important to get benefits to all important parties of the FLP stakeholders.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.">What agent architectures and communication protocols are most suitable for solving FLPs within the MAS solution, and how can they be optimized to enhance decision-making efficiency and coordination among agents?</head><p>For solving facility location problems within a MAS, agent architectures like decentralized and distributed systems can be used. Communication protocols like message passing and negotiation can be optimized through techniques like machine learning and data analytics to enhance decision-making efficiency and coordination among agents. This should be practically tested and proven during the research study.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.">What evaluation metrics should be defined to comprehensively assess the performance of the MAS solution in addressing facility location problems, including factors like cost reduction, customer satisfaction, and profitability enhancement?</head><p>Evaluation metrics for assessing the performance of a MAS solution in facility location problems should include metrics like cost reduction, customer satisfaction, and profitability enhancement. These metrics can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the MAS solution in addressing facility location problems and to identify areas for improvement.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.3.">Research Objectives</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Enhance Facility Location Decision-Making Efficiency through a Multi-Agent System:</head><p>The MAS platform will integrate decision-making algorithms and optimization techniques to enhance facility location solutions quality, enhancing efficiency and effectiveness in addressing FLPs.</p><p>Develop Appropriate Agent Architectures and Communication Protocols to Solve FLP Issues: The study aims to identify agent architectures and communication protocols for MAS solution to address facility location problems, and integrate stakeholders of FLP for mutual benefits, addressing the literate gap in real-time data from dynamic environments.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Evaluate performances of the MAS application Addressing Facility Location Challenges:</head><p>The MAS framework's adaptive over-capacity approach, utilizing real-time data and optimization techniques, can address challenges in competitive facility location decisions, minimizing costs and maximizing efficiency.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.">Research Direction</head><p>In the proposed research study, the objective is to develop an efficient MAS framework tailored to address the challenges encountered in facility location decisions. The research aims to optimize facility locations to minimize costs, maximize efficiency, and meet various constraints while considering factors like cost minimization, customer satisfaction, and competitive advantage <ref type="bibr" target="#b8">[9]</ref>.</p><p>Proposed Research Directions include four main steps: Dynamic Integration of Real-Time Data: The study aims to integrate real-time market intelligence and dynamic variables into the MAS framework for facility location optimization, enhancing decision-making processes.</p><p>Cooperative Behaviors and Information Integrating among FLP stakeholders: The FLP strategy aims to optimize facility locations and mitigate market cannibalization by promoting cooperative behaviors and information-sharing among agents, integrating stakeholders, and utilizing real-time data for decision-making.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Design and Development of MAS Architectures:</head><p>The study focuses on optimizing agent architectures and communication protocols in a distributed system (MAS) solution, utilizing machine learning and data analytics for enhanced performance.</p><p>Evaluation Metrics and Performance Assessment: Evaluate MAS solution's effectiveness in addressing facility location issues using metrics like cost reduction, customer satisfaction, and profitability enhancement to identify areas for improvement.</p><p>[10] <ref type="bibr" target="#b10">[11]</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.">Research Methodology and Tools</head><p>To fulfill the above research problem, questions, and objectives, several, suitable research methods should encompass both qualitative and quantitative approaches, leveraging the strengths of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) and optimization techniques. The following research techniques are to be used.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.1.">Literature Review</head><p>The literature review study gains a comprehensive understanding of the current state of facility location problems (FLPs), multiagent system (MAS) frameworks, optimization techniques, and relevant evaluation metrics through a systematic review of academic journals, conference papers, books, industry reports, and other relevant sources. Moreover, this method aims to identify knowledge gaps, theoretical foundations, and best practices to inform the design and implementation of the MAS environment. The expected outcome is to provide a detailed synthesis of the existing literature, which will guide future research and practical applications in the field of FLPs using MAS frameworks.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.2.">Conceptual System Modeling and Simulation</head><p>The Conceptual System Modeling and Simulation method aims to design a detailed MAS application to address research problems. It uses agent-based modeling to define the structure, roles, and interactions of agents and develops a robust MAS architecture with decision-making algorithms and communication protocols tailored to facility location problems. Initial simulations will be conducted.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.3.">Algorithm Development and Integration</head><p>The MAS platform method integrates advanced decision-making algorithms and optimization techniques, including genetic algorithms, swarm intelligence, and machine learning, to optimize agent interactions and facility location decisions, resulting in an optimized algorithm for efficient facility location decisions.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.4.">Agent Modeling, Development and Training</head><p>Integrating agent training, modeling, and development into the research methods is crucial for creating a robust Multi-Agent System (MAS).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="1.">Agent-based modeling (ABM) and development:</head><p>The phase involves designing and developing a MAS application, defining agent roles and interactions for stakeholders like customers, suppliers, and facilities. ABM tools and platforms will be used, and a scalability and flexibility framework will be implemented, resulting in a detailed application ready for integration, training, and testing.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.">Agent training and learning algorithms:</head><p>This phase aims to improve agent decision-making through training and adaptive learning using machine learning algorithms. Agents are trained using historical data, customer preferences, and market trends, and continuously refined for optimal performance in dynamic environments, resulting in informed, adaptive decisions.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.">Simulation and scenario analysis (testing and validation):</head><p>The method tests and validates the MAS application by creating diverse scenarios, and evaluating agent interactions, decision-making processes, and system performance. Results will be measured using metrics like cost efficiency, customer satisfaction, and competitive advantage, demonstrating the system's ability to handle real-world facility location problems. <ref type="bibr" target="#b11">[12]</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="6.">Discussion</head><p>The proposed and ongoing study MAS framework for facility location optimization was designed with a system architecture indicated in Figure <ref type="figure" target="#fig_0">1</ref>. This diagram has developed mainly through the outcome of the literature studies. Since the research gap indicated a lack of existing knowledge gap and studies for dynamic solutions within competitive FLP this system could able to provide the simulated solution. One of the main requirements is to fill the literature gap with a real-time data-gathering strategy for this study. As per the multistakeholder platform integration customers, delivery logistic staff, farmers, process and manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers like all parties are integrating and nurturing data to the MAS-FLP and will able to use real-time data for relevant agents of the MAS.</p><p>The future works of this ongoing research study need to fulfill several important steps to achieve the desired objectives. Investigation of facility location problems with their situation is a major need for designing MAS for grabbed problematic situations. With the design of the system, it may need to enhance consistency by discovering more practical situations as well as existing literature. As the next step, this will be required to analyze agent architecture with their skills and characteristics. The planning of the agent integration and protocol arrangement will be parallel to the above step. With the simulation and system development system testing would be required several indications like Scenario Development, Performance Metrics. Sametime, to engage in Integration with Real-World Data it required Stakeholder Engagement for testing and evaluation to be successful. </p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="7.">Conclusion</head><p>This research addresses the critical need for innovative and adaptive approaches in facility location optimization, driven by the dynamic and competitive nature of contemporary markets. The proposed Multi-Agent System (MAS) offers a transformative solution to the Facility Location Problem (FLP) by leveraging distributed decision-making agents. These agents will be designed to optimize facility locations in real-time, effectively integrating dynamic factors such as evolving consumer preferences, fluctuating market trends, and technological advancements.</p><p>By incorporating advanced decision-making algorithms and optimization techniques within the MAS platform, this study aims to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of facility location decisions. The development of appropriate agent architectures and communication protocols will ensure optimal coordination and interaction among agents, representing various stakeholders such as customers, suppliers, and facilities. This integration is crucial for achieving mutual benefits and addressing the complexities of FLPs in a dynamic environment.</p><p>The research objectives focus on enhancing facility location decision-making efficiency, developing robust MAS architectures, and integrating stakeholders to facilitate real-time data flow and adaptive decision-making. Comprehensive evaluation metrics, including cost reduction, customer satisfaction, and profitability enhancement, will be used to assess the performance of the MAS interface. These metrics will ensure that the proposed solution effectively addresses the challenges in facility location optimization, providing a practical and scalable approach for businesses.</p><p>Ultimately, this research contributes significantly to the field of operations research and management science by offering a novel and adaptive MAS-based solution for facility location optimization. The anticipated outcomes include improved market responsiveness, operational efficiency, and competitive sustainability. One of the main advantages for both corporate facilities and stakeholders such as customers is integration for mutual benefits. By bridging the knowledge gaps and addressing the challenges of dynamic and uncertain environments, this study holds the potential to revolutionize facility location strategies, fostering strategic resilience and long-term success for organizations in the increasingly competitive global landscape.</p></div><figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="fig_0"><head>Figure 1 :</head><label>1</label><figDesc>Figure 1: FLP for MAS application design.</figDesc><graphic coords="8,85.25,411.56,423.95,272.99" type="bitmap" /></figure>
		</body>
		<back>
			<div type="references">

				<listBibl>

<biblStruct xml:id="b0">
	<monogr>
		<title level="m" type="main">-A Multi-Agents System for Solving Facility Layout</title>
		<author>
			<persName><surname>Chraibi</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<imprint>
			<date type="published" when="2019">2019</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b1">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Solution methods for the bi-objective (cost-coverage) unconstrained facility location problem with an illustrative example</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">J</forename><forename type="middle">G</forename><surname>Villegas</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">F</forename><surname>Palacios</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">A</forename><forename type="middle">L</forename><surname>Medaglia</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<idno type="DOI">10.1007/s10479-006-0061-4</idno>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">Ann. Oper. Res</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">147</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="109" to="141" />
			<date type="published" when="2006-10">Oct. 2006</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b2">
	<analytic>
		<idno type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-642-14435-6</idno>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="m">Innovations in Multi-Agent Systems and Applications -1</title>
		<title level="s">Studies in Computational Intelligence</title>
		<editor>
			<persName><forename type="first">D</forename><surname>Srinivasan</surname></persName>
		</editor>
		<editor>
			<persName><forename type="first">L</forename><forename type="middle">C</forename><surname>Jain</surname></persName>
		</editor>
		<meeting><address><addrLine>Berlin, Heidelberg; Berlin Heidelberg</addrLine></address></meeting>
		<imprint>
			<publisher>Springer</publisher>
			<date type="published" when="2010">2010</date>
			<biblScope unit="volume">310</biblScope>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b3">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Globally Optimal Facility Locations for Continuous-Space Facility Location Problems</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">X</forename><surname>Gao</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">C</forename><surname>Park</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">X</forename><surname>Chen</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">E</forename><surname>Xie</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">G</forename><surname>Huang</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">D</forename><surname>Zhang</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<idno type="DOI">10.3390/app11167321</idno>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">Appl. Sci</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">11</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="issue">16</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page">7321</biblScope>
			<date type="published" when="2021-08">Aug. 2021</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b4">
	<monogr>
		<title level="m" type="main">A Reactive Agent Based Approach to Facility Location: Application to Transport</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">S</forename><surname>Moujahed</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">O</forename><surname>Simonin</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<imprint/>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b5">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Facility Location Optimization via Multi-Agent Robotic Systems</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">M</forename><surname>Moarref</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">H</forename><surname>Sayyaadi</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<idno type="DOI">10.1109/ICNSC.2008.4525227</idno>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="m">2008 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control</title>
				<meeting><address><addrLine>Sanya, China</addrLine></address></meeting>
		<imprint>
			<publisher>IEEE</publisher>
			<date type="published" when="2008-04">Apr. 2008</date>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="287" to="292" />
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b6">
	<monogr>
		<title level="m" type="main">A Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework for Resource Balancing in Complex Logistics Network</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">X</forename><surname>Li</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">J</forename><surname>Zhang</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">J</forename><surname>Bian</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">Y</forename><surname>Tong</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">T.-Y</forename><surname>Liu</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<ptr target="http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.00714" />
		<imprint>
			<date type="published" when="2019-03-02">Mar. 02, 2019. Apr. 08, 2024</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
	<note type="report_type">arXiv</note>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b7">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Deep Learning for Multi-Facility Location Mechanism Design</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">N</forename><surname>Golowich</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">H</forename><surname>Narasimhan</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">D</forename><forename type="middle">C</forename><surname>Parkes</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<idno type="DOI">10.24963/ijcai.2018/36</idno>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="m">Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence</title>
				<meeting>the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence<address><addrLine>Stockholm, Sweden</addrLine></address></meeting>
		<imprint>
			<date type="published" when="2018-07">Jul. 2018</date>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="261" to="267" />
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
	<note>International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization</note>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b8">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">A Multi-Agents System for Solving Facility Layout Problem: Application to Operating Theater</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">A</forename><surname>Chraibi</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">S</forename><surname>Kharraja</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">I</forename><forename type="middle">H</forename><surname>Osman</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">O</forename><surname>Elbeqqali</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<idno type="DOI">10.1515/jisys-2017-0081</idno>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">J. Intell. Syst</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">28</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="601" to="619" />
			<date type="published" when="2019-09">Sep. 2019</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b9">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">A multi-objective optimization model for a multi-period mobile facility location problem with environmental and disruption considerations</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">F</forename><surname>Maliki</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">M</forename><surname>Souier</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">M</forename><surname>Dahane</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">F</forename><surname>Ben Abdelaziz</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<idno type="DOI">10.1007/s10479-022-04945-4</idno>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">Ann. Oper. Res</title>
		<imprint>
			<date type="published" when="2022-09">Sep. 2022</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b10">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Simulation-Optimization Approach for Multi-Period Facility Location Problems with Forecasted and Random Demands in a Last-Mile Logistics Application</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">M</forename><surname>Rabe</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">J</forename><surname>Gonzalez-Feliu</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">J</forename><surname>Chicaiza-Vaca</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">R</forename><forename type="middle">D</forename><surname>Tordecilla</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<idno type="DOI">10.3390/a14020041</idno>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">Algorithms</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">14</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
			<date type="published" when="2021-01">Jan. 2021</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b11">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Developing multi-agent systems with JADE</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">F</forename><forename type="middle">L</forename><surname>Bellifemine</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">G</forename><surname>Caire</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">D</forename><surname>Greenwood</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">F</forename><surname>Bellifemine</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">D</forename><forename type="middle">P A</forename><surname>Greenwood</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="m">Wiley series in agent technology</title>
				<meeting><address><addrLine>Chichester</addrLine></address></meeting>
		<imprint>
			<publisher>Wiley</publisher>
			<date type="published" when="2008">2008</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
	<note>Reprinted</note>
</biblStruct>

				</listBibl>
			</div>
		</back>
	</text>
</TEI>
