<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Hersonissos, Greece
$ maximilian.staebler@dlr.de (M. Stäbler* ); paul.moosmann@fit.fraunhofer.de (P. Moosmann * )</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Semantic Data Link: Bridging Domain-Specific Needs with Universal and Interoperable Semantic Models</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Maximilian Stäbler</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Paul Moosmann</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Patrick Dittmer</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>DanDan Wang</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Frank Köster</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Christoph Lange</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Behörde für Verkehr und Mobilitätswende (BVM)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Hamburg</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Sankt Augustin</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>German Aerospace Center (DLR) Institute for AI Safety &amp; Security</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Ulm</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>RWTH Aachen University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Aachen</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4">
          <label>4</label>
          <institution>T-Systems International GmbH</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Bonn</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>000</volume>
      <fpage>0</fpage>
      <lpage>0003</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The emergence of data-driven systems necessitates enhanced interoperability across diverse data ecosystems. Traditional approaches to semantic interoperability have been hindered by the complexity and specificity of ontologies, demanding significant expertise and resources for their development and maintenance. This paper introduces the Semantic Data Link (SDL) framework, a novel approach that aims to democratize data description and enhance semantic interoperability. SDL ofers a domain and ontology-independent methodology, focusing on a multi-layered architecture that emphasizes decentralized semantics and categorizes data into definitional, structural, and contextual aspects. Developed as part of the Gaia-X 4 Future Mobility initiative, SDL is particularly pertinent to the mobility sector, where real-time data exchange and interoperability are crucial. This framework promises to bridge the gap between varying levels of expertise in semantic technologies and accelerate the development of semantically interoperable applications and services. We provide an in-depth discussion on the conceptual framework, design rationale, and implementation of SDL. The paper concludes with insights into the practical implications of SDL and prospective directions for future research in the quest for a seamless, interoperable data landscape.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Semantic Interoperability</kwd>
        <kwd>Data Ecosystems</kwd>
        <kwd>Dataspaces</kwd>
        <kwd>Domain Agnostic Framework</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction and Motivation</title>
      <p>
        Eficient data exchange and interoperability are crucial in various ecosystems [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], especially
in the mobility sector [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], where they face significant challenges due to real-time data
sharing demands across domains [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. This situation exacerbates urban issues like congestion and
pollution, as interoperability deficits limit the development of smart, connected urban
mobility services [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. Data heterogeneity, marked by incompatible message formats, complicates
seamless data interoperability [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. Although traditional ontology approaches have aimed at
alignment [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4 ref5 ref6">5, 4, 6</xref>
        ], merging [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7 ref8">7, 8</xref>
        ], and matching [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref5 ref9">9, 10, 5</xref>
        ] to address these issues, they adhere
to the “80/20” principle, where automated solutions handle most discrepancies but still leave
complex cases needing manual refinement [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]. The advancement of semantic interoperability
is constrained by the complexity and specialized knowledge required for ontology development
and deployment [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11 ref12">11, 12</xref>
        ]. This complexity necessitates that stakeholders possess advanced
skills in semantic technology and ontology engineering, limiting the prevalence of semantically
interoperable solutions.
      </p>
      <p>
        However, the legislative landscape is evolving to address some of these barriers. A
noteworthy advancement in this direction is the adoption of the European Data Governance Act
(DGA), which represents a important step towards enhancing trust and expanding data
availability across Europe. Under the European Data Act (Data Act), mobility service providers are
mandated to make data exportable, understandable, and reusable for other stakeholders in the
value chain, including end-users and manufacturers. This legislative move underscores the
importance of interoperability and data sharing, potentially easing some of the complexity and
expertise barriers associated with semantic technologies. In a communication to the European
Parliament, the European Commission has called for the development of a common European
Mobility Data Space. This communication also calls for interoperability (interlinking) between
diferent dataspaces, which are defined as collaborative digital architectures enabling secure
and sovereign data exchange among diverse stakeholders. In parallel, initiatives such as the
European Open Science Cloud EOSC and the adoption of the FAIR (Findable, Accessible,
Interoperable, Reusable) Data Principles further reinforce the importance of developing robust
dataspaces. These challenges highlight the critical need for solutions that bridge semantic gaps
between interconnected dataspaces, moving from ineficiency to semantic interoperability [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>A specific example of this trend towards increasing data transparency and interoperability
at a more localized level is seen in the City of Hamburg, Germany. Due to the Hamburg
Transparency Act (Hamburger Transparenzgesetz), public sector datasets in Hamburg must be
made directly accessible and published as open data, while ensuring the protection of personal
data. Data is published via the Hamburger Transparenzportal using the European metadata
standard DCAT-AP. However, this standard primarily concerns how data is cataloged, but not
its format, which is chosen individually. Consequently, the need for semantic interoperability is
not just a broad European challenge but indeed also exists at a localized level, as demonstrated
by the Hamburg initiative.</p>
      <p>This paper presents the Semantic Data Link (SDL) framework as an innovative solution
to establish semantic interoperability between previously incompatible systems, data sources
and applications. With an emphasis on ease of use and domain agnosticism, SDL addresses
a wide range of domains and applications. In particular, it is designed to be accessible to
domain experts without prior knowledge of semantic technologies such as Resource Description
Framework (RDF) or Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL), enabling them to create meaningful
and universally applicable descriptions. Developed as part of the Gaia-X 4 Future Mobility
(GX4FM) project family – a Gaia-X initiative – SDL embodies the vision of a more connected,
eficient and innovative mobility future. It enables the free and meaningful flow of data across
borders and sectors. The project family involves more than 80 partners from industry, research
and the public sector, and each of them requires continuous ontology updates to keep pace
with evolving domain knowledge and practices. Updates often lag behind due to the dynamic
and resource-intensive nature of these revisions. In particular, manual intervention is normally
needed, which slows down the interoperability process and introduces the risk of inconsistencies.
With these challenges in mind, we developed SDL to facilitate semantic interoperability, the
efectiveness of which will be validated in partnership with the City of Hamburg to enhance
future mobility applications. The collaboration with industry partners and municipalities
demonstrates the industry-driven approach of this project and highlights its potential for
widespread adoption and impact.</p>
      <p>The paper is structured as follows: We begin with a background section that sets the context
for our study, highlighting the current state of semantic interoperability. We then present the
SDL, detailing its conceptual underpinnings and describing its implementation process. The
paper concludes with a discussion of our findings, implications for practice, and directions for
future research in this evolving field.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Background</title>
      <p>
        In this section, we will give an overview of the background of our work. Specifically, we
will cover the topics of Semantic Web technologies, corresponding tool support, and give a
short introduction to the dataspace initiative Gaia-X. This work emerged in the context of
building a dataspace based on Gaia-X, which is directly connected to the topic of Semantic Web
technologies and tools since their use is central to the implementation of federated dataspaces
in Gaia-X. A general overview of the role of semantics in dataspaces is given by Theissen-Lipp
et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Semantic Web Technologies and Tool Support. There have been several reviews of the</title>
        <p>
          current status of Semantic Web technologies in recent years, such as the works of Hitzler [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ]
or Patel and Jain [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
          ]. These works identify the W3C standards RDF, RDF Schema, OWL, and
SPARQL as core technologies. In our work, we extend this list with SHACL, which builds upon
RDF and is used for validating RDF graphs against a set of conditions. SHACL plays a vital
role not only in the functionality of the SDL but also in underpinning semantic technologies
within dataspace initiatives, such as Gaia-X or IDS. Based on these core technologies, further
vocabularies were defined, which today, due to their widespread adoption, can also be seen as
part of the core of the Semantic Web. Examples include the SKOS and DCAT vocabularies [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15 ref16">15, 16</xref>
          ].
These are also used in the context of the SDL and Gaia-X. While the development of further
vocabularies leads to a stronger (and more standardized) core, Hogan [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
          ] compiled various
criticisms regarding the Semantic Web, with one being that the standards are complex and
dificult to understand. To tackle this problem, various tools have been developed to aid users
of Semantic Web technologies. The survey of Khamparia and Pandey gives a good overview of
existing Semantic Web reasoners and tools [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          ]. Some prominent examples include the Protégé
ontology editor, the ELK reasoner or the Linked Open Vocabularies (LOV) database [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref17">14, 17</xref>
          ].
Even though the Semantic Web is being criticized for its lack of usable systems and tools [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
          ],
a variety of isolated tools exist, that can be built upon or integrated into the SDL. That way,
the SDL decreases the impact of lacking Semantic Web expertise by its users, without being
redundant. E.g., we use LOV to reuse existing vocabularies and foster interoperability. We also
reduce the complexity of creating OWL and SHACL schemas, by using the LinkML model to
generate them. LinkML is a general purpose modeling language. While LinkML is designed
to work in harmony with semantic RDF-based frameworks, it uses the human-readable data
serialization language YAML, making it more approachable for non RDF experts [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
          ].
Gaia-X. Gaia-X, a European initiative for secure data sharing, employs federated services with
Semantic Web technologies to ensure data trustworthiness. Participants and services within
Gaia-X must provide credentials as specified by the W3C Verifiable Credential Data Model. The
content of the credentials is detailed in the Gaia-X Trust Framework and their corresponding
OWL and SHACL schemas are retrievable from the Gaia-X Registry. Also, implementations
using the LinkML schema already exist and can be found in the repository of the Gaia-X Working
Group Service Characteristics. Since SDL was developed to streamline the creation of credentials
and associated OWL and SHACL schemas for usage within and beyond the Gaia-X context, we
decided to build SDL on top of LinkML to support already existing resources.
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Semantic Data Link</title>
      <p>Recognizing the vital necessity of enhancing semantic interoperability within data ecosystems,
the SDL framework emerges as a transformative solution. SDL proposes a domain agnostic
approach to synchronize data models, data services and representation formats. This
methodology paves the way towards the democratization of the development of meaningful data
descriptions for individuals lacking comprehensive proficiency in semantic technologies. This
section elaborates SDL’s conceptual foundation with key functionalities, the rationale behind
its innovative design, and the implementation, which aims to provide a comprehensive solution
for data heterogeneity and interoperability.</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>3.1. Conceptual Framework</title>
        <p>SDL enables a uniform description framework for individual data records without mandating
particular standards. This flexibility allows for the integration of existing semantic
descriptions from diverse domains, including but not limited to datasets, services, digital twins, and
other relevant fields, facilitating compatibility with industry standards such as OPC UA. Its
intermediate layer bridges disparate data descriptions without necessitating alterations to the
source systems, thereby providing advantages to a broad range of stakeholders. Publishers do
not need to adopt new formats for compatibility, which lowers the entry barrier and therefore
enhances data availability. Consumers benefit from standardized descriptions and improved data
comparability and usability from various sources. Also, enhanced data discoverability allows all
users to precisely locate necessary data for applications and services. Figure 1 illustrates the
stacked approach of the SDL and emphasizes decentralized semantics by categorizing data into
definitional ( semantic), structural (morphologic), and contextual (pragmatic) aspects for complex
entities like services or datasets. This categorization aids in aggregating digital representations
with rich contextual understanding. At its core, SDL features an Entity Core encapsulating
essential dataset or service attributes (e.g., provider ID, name) and assigns a unique identifier to
each entity, streamlining referencing and interactions in the data ecosystem. This approach
draws upon the theoretical foundation laid out by the Overlay Capture Architecture (OCA).
OCA is a framework designed to enable data harmonization and privacy compliant sharing
across diferent governance frameworks. Extensions are critical in SDL because they add layers
of metadata to the entity core, taking semantic, morphological, contextual and other individual
and application-specific dimensions into consideration. The selection of attributes for the SDL
framework was significantly influenced by a combination of the foundational principles from
the OCA and extensive deliberations within the GX4FM project’s Expert Group on semantics,
ensuring alignment with both theoretical and practical requirements of data interoperability. This
is an evolving, community-driven efort, open to incorporating additional attributes in future
versions to better meet the emerging needs and insights of the diverse stakeholder community.
This architecture supports modular interoperability and semantic integrity, is domain agnostic,
and harmonizes data models and formats across boundaries. Its layered design enriches data
and service descriptions, improving comparability and interoperability to eficiently meet the
needs of diverse domains and applications.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>3.2. Rationale Behind SDL’s Design Choices</title>
        <p>The SDL framework seeks to overcome the limitations of existing semantic interoperability
frameworks, responding to industry calls for a solution that is more flexible and responsive than
traditional, rigid systems, thereby ofering a user-friendly alternative capable of evolving with
technological and business needs. Compatibility with arbitrary ontologies creates a flexible
framework for data description. This design choice directly responds to the industry’s
requirement for simplified semantic technologies that can accommodate the diverse backgrounds of
users, including domain experts, without any preliminary semantic knowledge. By
decentralizing semantics, SDL broadens user participation, which leads to a more inclusive data ecosystem.
The presented extensions and entity core concept enhances the data’s contextual understanding,
which is crucial for interoperability. This not only improves data description precision but also
ensures the ecosystem’s adaptability and scalability, meeting industry needs for evolving data
landscapes.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>3.3. Implementation of SDL</title>
        <p>The implementation of SDL consists of a front-end component that allows user input and a
backend component that uses this input to generate an output consisting of structured data in YAML
and RDF format. To collect user input, we provide a simple UI that allows the user to define the
data they want to describe. Since SDL is designed to help non-Semantic Web experts create
RDF data, the UI enables gathering all the necessary information without requiring the user to
apply any Semantic Web technologies. Figure 2 shows an overview of the main components of
our SDL implementation. The user input component consists of (1) two text fields that collect
information about the namespace and prefix used, (2) a part where the user can add attributes
necessary to describe the data, and (3) additional layers that can be used to extend the data by
certain predefined attributes to improve the data description. While the currently implemented
layers focus on the basic metadata description of datasets (see Figure 1), it is possible and
intended to implement additional layers in future releases. Once the user input is complete, the
schema generation component is used to create a YAML lfie that follows the LinkML model
from the input. LinkML provides a framework for generating RDF schemas from the YAML
ifle. We chose LinkML as the basis for SDL to seamlessly integrate future Gaia-X schemas
already modeled in LinkML, leveraging existing work and its framework for straightforward
implementation and user-defined attribute modeling through the pre-defined parameters of
LinkML. These include (1) required and multivalued to model cardinality constraints, (2) a
description of the attribute, (3) a regex pattern that defines constraints on the attribute value, and
(4) a URI that can point to already defined attributes to facilitate reuse of existing vocabularies.
We enhance vocabulary reuse and new attribute creation by automatically linking to the Linked
Open Vocabularies (LOV) database. When users create an attribute and name it, a LOV search
auto-executes, presenting the top ten results for selection. An example is shown in Table 1. Any
of these attributes can be selected to be used if they meet the user’s requirements. If none of
the suggestions fit, a new attribute is created under the previously defined namespace. Finally,
the LinkML framework generators are used to generate an OWL graph and a SHACL graph
from the LinkML YAML created from the user input. While LinkML also provides generators to
generate schemas in other formats from the YAML file, we limit the output to OWL and SHACL
graphs, as these are the relevant schemas in the context of the Gaia-X dataspace initiative. This
can be easily adapted for other use cases. A future implementation of the SDL will also use
the LinkML YAML to transfer the stored information into a knowledge graph, which plays an
important role in promoting semantic interoperability. The current implementation of the SDL,
as described in this section, can be found in the form of a GitHub repository. This repository
also contains instructions for installing the SDL locally using Docker.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Summary and Future Work</title>
      <p>Conclusion. In summary, SDL represents a significant advancement towards achieving
seamless semantic interoperability within data ecosystems. By abstracting the complexities
of domain-specific ontologies and providing a user-friendly, multi-layered architecture, SDL
democratizes data description and fosters an inclusive ecosystem of data exchange. The
framework’s potential was evidenced through its applicability in the mobility sector, with future
enhancements poised to extend its utility across various domains. The development of SDL aims
to improve interoperability between existing data infrastructures while lowering the complexity
hurdles of semantic technologies.</p>
      <p>Limitation. The SDL leverages the LinkML Framework for generating OWL and SHACL
graphs, with its limitations bifurcating into: (1) LinkML’s OWL and SHACL generators
inadequately translating defined constraints within the schema to corresponding graphs, exemplified
by the non-translated properties such as any_of or equals_string_in, and (2) the incapacity
of the LinkML schema to represent certain semantic details expressible in OWL or SHACL.
Addressing these limitations is imperative, involving the expansion of the LinkML schema
to encompass broader semantic expressions, and enhancing the generators for full property
translation. Continued refinement will explore extending the existing LinkML schema and
evaluating alternative frameworks to ensure SDL’s adaptability to future semantic interoperability
requirements.</p>
      <p>Future Work. Moving forward, we have identified several areas for future research. Firstly,
we suggest focusing on the enhancement of SDL through the creation of a Knowledge Graph
that enables advanced interoperability. This graph should be composed of the descriptions
generated by the SDL. Secondly, there is a need to refine SDL’s multi-layered architecture to
broaden its adoption. Lastly, further evaluation in a real-world setting is essential to validate
the efectiveness and applicability of these advancements. The ultimate goal of these proposed
areas of research is to achieve scalable and resilient interoperability, democratize data usage
across diverse ecosystems, and accomplish these without the necessity for specialized semantic
expertise.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Afairs and Climate
Action and by the European Commission, whose funding has been crucial to our research eforts.
We also thank the Core-Working-Group Semantics of the Gaia-X 4 Future Mobility project family
for their significant contributions to the Semantic Data Link, enhancing our work on data
interoperability and governance.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Henßen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Schleipen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Interoperability between opc ua and automationml</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Procedia</surname>
            <given-names>CIRP</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.procir.
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <volume>10</volume>
          .042.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Paiva</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. A. A. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Tripathi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Feroz</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Casalino,
          <article-title>Enabling technologies for urban smart mobility: Recent trends, opportunities and challenges</article-title>
          .,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sensors</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/ s21062143.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Kouroubali</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>D. G. Katehakis,</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>The new european interoperability framework as a facilitator of digital transformation for citizen empowerment</article-title>
          .,
          <source>Journal of Biomedical Informatics</source>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.jbi.
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <volume>103166</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Ardjani</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Bouchihaand</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Malki</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Ontology-alignment techniques: Survey and analysis</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science</source>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .5815/ ijmecs.
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <volume>11</volume>
          .08.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Khoudja</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Fareh</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Bouarfa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Ontology matching using neural networks: Survey and analysis</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Conference on Independent Component Analysis and Signal Separation</source>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/icass.
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <volume>8652049</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. H.</given-names>
            <surname>Nejhadi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Shadgar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Osareh</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Ontology alignment using machine learning techniques</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology</source>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .5121/ijcsit.
          <year>2011</year>
          .
          <volume>3210</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Khamparia</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Pandey</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Comprehensive analysis of semantic web reasoners and tools: a survey, Education and Information Technologies (</article-title>
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
          <source>doi:10.1007/ s10639-017-9574-5.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Fahad</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Moalla</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Bouras</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Detection and resolution of semantic inconsistency and redundancy in an automatic ontology merging system</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems</source>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/s10844-012-0202-y.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Tong</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Qin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Ontology matching: State of the art, future challenges, and thinking based on utilized information</article-title>
          , IEEE Access (
          <year>2021</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/access.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>3057081</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Bento</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Zouaq</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Gagnon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Ontology matching using convolutional neural networks</article-title>
          .,
          <source>International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation</source>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). doi:null.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Boukhers</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Lange</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Beyan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Enhancing data space semantic interoperability through machine learning: a visionary perspective</article-title>
          ,
          <source>The Web Conference</source>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1145/ 3543873.3587658.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Stäbler</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Guggenberger</surname>
          </string-name>
          , W. DanDan,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Mrasek</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Köster</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>C.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Langdon Schlueter, Bridging Data Domains: Towards Semantic Interoperability in Heterogeneous Data Ecosystems and Data Spaces, [Manuscript submitted for publication] (</article-title>
          <year>2024</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Theissen-Lipp</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Kocher</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Lange</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Decker</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Paulus</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Pomp</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. Curry,
          <article-title>Semantics in dataspaces: Origin and future directions</article-title>
          ,
          <source>The Web Conference</source>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1145/ 3543873.3587689.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Hitzler</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A review of the semantic web field, Communications of The ACM (</article-title>
          <year>2021</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1145/3397512.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Patel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Jain</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Present and future of semantic web technologies: a research statement</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Journal of Computers and Applications</source>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1080/1206212x.
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <volume>1570666</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Hogan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The semantic web: Two decades on</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Social Work</source>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3233/ sw-190387.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Gandon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A survey of the first 20 years of research on semantic web and linked data, Ingénierie Des Systèmes D'information (</article-title>
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
          <source>doi:10.3166/isi.23.3-4</source>
          .
          <fpage>11</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>38</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Moxon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Solbrig</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Unni</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Jiao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Bruskiewich</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Balhof</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Vaidya,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W. D.</given-names>
            <surname>Duncan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Hegde</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Miller</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
            <surname>Brush</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Harris</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Haendel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Mungall</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The linked data modeling language (linkml): A general-purpose data modeling framework grounded in machine-readable semantics</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Conference on Biomedical Ontology</source>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ). doi:null.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <surname>P.-Y. Vandenbussche</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Atemezing</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Poveda-Villalón</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vatant</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Linked open vocabularies (lov): a gateway to reusable semantic vocabularies on the web</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Sprachwissenschaft</source>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3233/sw-160213.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>