<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>June</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Assessment of digital tools utilization in marketing activities of enterprises in Ukraine and EU countries using cluster analysis method</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nestor Shpak</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Kateryna Doroshkevych</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ihor Hrabovych</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Anglia Ruskin University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford, CM1 1SQ</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UK">United Kingdom</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Lviv Polytechnic National University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>12 Stepan Bandery str., Lviv, 79013</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>2024</issue>
      <abstract>
        <p>In various industries of modern business, digital tools are becoming not only a support but also a key element of a successful marketing strategy. Particularly in the field of marketing, their utilization becomes a determining factor of efficiency and competitiveness of enterprises. The aim of the research is to systematize and analyze the level of digital tools utilization in the marketing activities of enterprises in Ukraine and European Union countries using the cluster analysis method. Various aspects of digital tools utilization in the marketing activities of enterprises have been considered, including website, social media, e-commerce, and more. A system of key indicators characterizing the level of digital tools utilization in the marketing activities of enterprises has been proposed. Cluster analysis has allowed to identify three groups of EU countries regarding the level of digital tools utilization in the marketing activities of enterprises. The grouping of countries has helped to understand the similarity in their approach to the use of digital tools, as well as to identify differences and peculiarities among market segments. A significant difference in the level of digital tools utilization has been observed among the clusters of the studied countries. According to the results of cluster modeling, Ukraine has been classified into the third cluster along with countries such as Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania. A general analysis of indicators in this cluster indicates that Ukraine has the lowest level of digital tools utilization in the marketing activities of enterprises among the countries represented in this list. The research findings can be valuable for the development of marketing strategies and digital transformation of enterprises in the mentioned countries.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>digital marketing</kwd>
        <kwd>digital tools</kwd>
        <kwd>digitization</kwd>
        <kwd>website</kwd>
        <kwd>social media</kwd>
        <kwd>e-commerce</kwd>
        <kwd>cluster analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>standardization of metrics</kwd>
        <kwd>1</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>In various sectors of modern business, digital tools have become not only a support but also
a key element of successful marketing strategies. Particularly in the field of marketing, their
use becomes a decisive factor in the effectiveness and competitiveness of enterprises.
However, assessing the level of utilization of digital tools in marketing activities remains a
relevant task for both Ukrainian and European companies.</p>
      <p>Digital marketing is indeed becoming increasingly important and effective in achieving
business goals. Many companies in Ukraine, as well as in other countries, are already
leveraging digital technologies in their marketing activities. The assessment of digital tool
utilization encompasses analysis of website performance, social media engagement, email
marketing effectiveness, online advertising efficiency, analytics insights, mobile marketing
strategies, content marketing efforts, automation, and many other aspects. Additionally,
evaluating the impact of these technologies on consumer experience and competitiveness
is crucial.</p>
      <p>In the face of the massive influx of information, it's essential to conduct analysis,
grouping, and systematization to gain valuable insights and make informed decisions in
business [1]. Cluster analysis allows for the identification of subgroups or patterns within
the data, which helps in understanding their structure and regularities. Conducting analysis
and grouping of information allows achieving several important goals [2, 3]. Firstly, it helps
identify key trends and patterns in the use of digital tools in the marketing activities of
enterprises. Secondly, it enables conducting comparative analysis among different groups
of companies, allowing to identify the most effective strategies and practices. For example,
in the source [4], cluster analysis method was used to group European countries in order to
identify characteristics of social protection policies within EU countries, enabling
comparative and correlative analysis. And finally, cluster analysis facilitates the
identification of opportunities for optimizing the use of digital tools and developing
personalized approaches to marketing strategy. Researchers Shpak et al. [5] demonstrated
the effectiveness of using cluster analysis in developing principles for assessing the value of
products of IT enterprises and the effectiveness of applied business models.</p>
      <p>Thus, the systematization and analysis of information using cluster analysis are key
stages in the process of improving the marketing strategy of enterprises aimed at achieving
competitive advantage and sustainable growth in the digital era. Data collection and
analysis help obtain an objective picture of the utilization of digital technologies in the
marketing activities of enterprises. Based on this data, a strategy can be developed for
further development and enhancement of the company's marketing activities, taking into
account the conditions of digital transformation.</p>
      <p>Taking into account the considerations outlined, the purpose of the study is to
systematize and analyze the level of utilization of digital tools in the marketing activities of
enterprises in Ukraine and European Union countries using the method of cluster analysis.
This research aims to identify groups of countries with similar approaches and levels of
using digital tools in marketing activities of enterprises in Ukraine and EU countries.
Grouping countries will help us understand the similarity in their approach to the use of
digital tools and identify differences and peculiarities among market segments.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Related works</title>
      <p>Analysis of scientific sources helps to understand a wide range of approaches and practices
in the use of digital tools in the marketing activities of enterprises. Research enables the
identification of various strategies used by companies to promote products and services in
the online environment, including through the use of content marketing, social media,
electronic distribution channels, mobile applications, and other digital platforms. Studying
the impact of digitalization on the marketing activities of enterprises, researchers
AlonsoGarcia et al. [6] developed a reference model that allows understanding the factors
influencing the multi-channel management of an organization in a business-to-business
(B2B) context. Another group of researchers, Kljucnikov et al. [7], studying the impact of
marketing tools' utilization by small and medium enterprises on their innovation activities,
identified a positive influence of using technologically enabled marketing channels
compared to traditional ones. In the context of studying factors influencing the development
of innovation networks, Prokopenko O. and Omelyanenko V. [8] emphasize the significant
role of relationship marketing, which involves building long-term mutually beneficial
relationships with key business partners. The necessity of employing digital tools to
enhance the efficiency of systematic organization in managing logistical flows is also
substantiated by researchers [9]. This is particularly crucial in the context of modern
business, where the speed, accuracy, and efficiency of executing logistical operations are
paramount for satisfying customer needs and ensuring the competitiveness of enterprises.
Researchers Kisiołek et al. [10] proposed a conceptual model of digital marketing
communication in higher education institutions, arguing that the use of digital marketing
plays a key role in promoting their educational services, improving communication with
students, and creating a positive image in the market.</p>
      <p>Studying scientific sources allows understanding which digital tools influence consumer
behaviour in online environments, their advantages, and limitations. Digital tools, such as
social media, can make products and services more accessible to a wide range of consumers
and enable them to make purchases and obtain information at any time and from any
location [11]. However, digital tools play a crucial role not only in facilitating trade but also
in gathering and analyzing market information about trade. Researchers Lovrić et al. [12]
demonstrate that many social network analysis procedures can be applied in the field of
international trade of forest products. According to them, social network analysis,
compared to statistical analysis, allows for a more detailed understanding of the structure
of the international trade network.</p>
      <p>Researching scientific sources confirms the significance of applying various econometric
and mathematical models to determine the effectiveness of utilizing digital tools in
enterprise activities [13, 14]. Econometric and mathematical models provide analytical
tools for studying various aspects of the effectiveness and performance of digital marketing
strategies and technological innovations [15, 16]. In particular, the use of cluster analysis is
one of the effective methods in researching the effectiveness of utilizing digital tools in the
marketing activities of enterprises [17-19]. Cluster analysis allows grouping similar objects
into classes or clusters based on common characteristics, helping to understand the
diversity of the audience and optimize marketing strategies considering the individual
needs and interests of each segment.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Methods</title>
      <p>Cluster analysis method was used to evaluate the utilization of digital tools in the marketing
activities of enterprises in Ukraine and EU countries. Cluster analysis is a statistical method
used to group objects into similar clusters based on their similarity. This method helps
identify natural relationships and structure in data where predefined categories or labels
are not known in advance.</p>
      <p>The main steps of cluster analysis are as follows:
1. The first step is selecting the similarity metric. For our analysis, we have chosen the
Euclidean distance, which measures the distance between two points in space. This
metric originated from geometric theory and is used in various fields of science and
engineering, including mathematics, physics, computer science, and statistics. It
helps determine how close or far apart objects are in space.
2. The next step is selecting the clustering method. There are several methods of
cluster analysis, such as hierarchical clustering and k-means clustering. For our
study, we have utilized the hierarchical clustering method, which groups objects into
clusters based on their similarity. This method creates a hierarchical structure of
clusters, where each object is initially considered as a separate cluster and then
merged into larger clusters, gradually combining similar groups of objects [20, 21].
This process continues until all objects are merged into one large cluster, or until a
predetermined number of clusters is reached. For merging clusters into larger
clusters during the hierarchical clustering process, the agglomerative hierarchical
clustering method is utilized, specifically Ward's method. Ward's method
determines which pairs of clusters should be merged in a way that minimizes the
increase in mixed dispersion of the new cluster. Typically, this involves calculating
the average dispersion for each cluster and the dispersion of the new cluster formed
by their merger. The merging occurs for the pair of clusters with the smallest
increase in dispersion [22].
3. The determination of the number of clusters is done graphically by constructing a
dendrogram of object merging. A dendrogram is a graphical representation of the
results of hierarchical clustering. It is a tree-like diagram that illustrates the
hierarchical structure of clusters and helps visualize how objects (or groups of
objects) are merged into larger clusters during the clustering process.
4. Cluster analysis was performed using the Statistica software, which is an integrated
data analysis and statistics software developed by StatSoft, Inc. With Statistica,
cluster analysis and hierarchical clustering for data can be easily conducted,
providing options for selecting different clustering methods, computing distances,
and visualizing results.
5. Evaluation and interpretation of the results.</p>
      <p>The data used for this study were obtained from the website of the European
Commission at https://ec.europa.eu/. This website serves as a reliable source of statistical
and analytical information about the economy, business environment, and marketing
trends of European Union countries. The data gathered from this source enabled an
objective and cluster analysis of the use of digital tools in the marketing activities of EU
enterprises, as well as a comparison of their practices with Ukrainian standards. With these
data, the study can provide valuable insights and recommendations for the development of
marketing strategies both in the European Union and in Ukraine. Information about the
state and dynamics of the use of information and communication technologies in the
marketing activities of Ukrainian enterprises was obtained from the website of the State
Statistics Service of Ukraine in the section “Economic Statistics / Economic Activities /
Information Society” [23].</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Results and discussions</title>
      <p>To describe the level of digitization of enterprises, particularly in EU countries, the Digital
Intensity Index (DII) is used [24]. This composite index is derived from surveys regarding
the use of ICT and electronic commerce in enterprises. The DII is one of the key indicators
of effectiveness in the context of the Digital Decade, which outlines European ambitions
regarding digital technologies by articulating a vision for digital transformation and specific
goals for 2030 across four key areas: skills, infrastructure, digital enterprise transformation,
and government services. The indicator measures the adoption of various technologies by
enterprises and was first compiled in 2015.</p>
      <p>Denmark, Sweden, and Finland have the highest Digital Intensity Index, indicating a high
level of digital readiness in these countries and a very high level of information and digital
technology utilization by enterprises. These countries integrate digital solutions and
innovations into their economic processes, contributing to increased productivity and
competitiveness of business activities. Conversely, countries such as Slovakia, Luxembourg,
Italy, France, Greece, Bulgaria, and Romania exhibit very low levels of enterprise
digitization, demonstrating lower readiness to adopt modern digital technologies and
information solutions in their business operations.</p>
      <p>The measurement of the degree of digitization of enterprises is an important aspect for
understanding the economic development of countries, as digital transformation can
enhance the efficiency of business processes and provide new opportunities for innovation
and development [25], including marketing activities. Therefore, countries with low levels
of digital intensity require more attention and investment in digital development to ensure
their competitive position in the global market.</p>
      <p>The clustering was conducted based on indicators characterizing the level of digital tools
utilization in the marketing activities of enterprises in the countries (Table 1):
х1 – the proportion of enterprises with access to the Internet, %;
х2 – the proportion of enterprises with a website in the total number of enterprises, %;
х3 – the proportion of enterprises whose website enables ordering or booking online, %;
N
х4 – the proportion of enterprises using social media in the total number of enterprises,
%;
х5 – the proportion of enterprises purchasing cloud computing services, including email,
in the total number of enterprises, %;
х6 – the proportion of enterprises purchasing cloud computing services, including
customer/client information management software, in the total number of
enterprises, %;
х7 – the proportion of enterprises conducting big data analysis in the total number of
enterprises, %;
х8 – the proportion of enterprises using AI technologies for marketing or sales in the
total number of enterprises, %.</p>
      <p>The website is an important and necessary digital marketing tool for most modern
businesses. It serves various functions, including creating an online presence, providing
information to customers, selling products and services, generating leads, social media and
SEO, and analytics [26, 27]. Through the website, a business can interact with its audience,
develop its brand, and refine its marketing strategies to succeed in the digital age. According
to Eurostat [28], the share of enterprises in EU countries with a website, as of 2021, was
77.7%. This indicates the widespread use of the Internet and the importance of online
presence for businesses. Finland (96.1%), the Netherlands (92.3%), Sweden (90.8%),
Austria (91%), and Germany (89.4%) have the highest percentages of enterprises using
websites for marketing and product sales. This reflects active development in digital
technologies and a high level of digital readiness in these countries. Romania (51.2%) and
Bulgaria (51.9%) have the lowest percentages of enterprises using websites. This suggests
opportunities for further development of digital technologies and digital transformation in
these countries.</p>
      <p>Overall, social media has become an essential part of marketing strategy for businesses
of any scale and industry. Their effective use can lead to increased brand awareness [29],
higher sales, and strengthened market positions. According to Eurostat data [30], the share
of enterprises in EU countries using social media as of 2021 was 58.7%. This indicates an
average level of social media usage among enterprises. Norway (84.7%), Malta (84.4%),
Sweden (80.1%), the Netherlands (79.7%), Denmark (77.4%), Cyprus (77.1%), and
Belgium (76.2%) have the highest percentages of enterprises using social media for
marketing and product sales. Romania (36.1%), Bulgaria (38.9%), Slovakia (45.2%), and
Poland (45.6%) have the lowest levels of enterprises using social media. This suggests
opportunities for further growth in social media usage for marketing and sales in these
countries. These data highlight the differences in the levels of social media usage for
marketing activities among different EU countries and underscore the importance of digital
marketing in modern business.</p>
      <p>A significant indicator for assessing the level of digital transformation and the use of
internet platforms in marketing is the dynamics of the share of enterprises engaged in
ecommerce. This indicator reflects how quickly enterprises adopt the Internet as a sales
channel and interact with consumers. The growth in the share of enterprises using
ecommerce is a result of the development of digital technologies, changes in consumer
habits, and the globalization of markets [31-33]. The general trend is an increase in the
share of enterprises in EU countries using e-commerce, as this sector offers many
advantages in accessing new markets, reducing costs, and improving business efficiency.
However, the level and pace of growth vary depending on each specific country and
economic sector. The highest share of enterprises engaged in e-commerce sales, with a
share of at least 1% of turnover, as of 2022, is observed in EU countries such as Sweden
(36.6%), Denmark (35.6%), Ireland (35.3%), Lithuania (32%), and Malta (30%). For other
countries, this percentage is below 30%, with the lowest percentage of enterprises engaged
in e-commerce sales characteristic of Luxembourg (8%).</p>
      <p>On Figure 1, the dendrogram illustrating the clustering of EU countries and Ukraine
based on the level of digital tools utilization in the marketing activities of enterprises is
presented.
С_3
С_25
С_11
С_22
С_6
С_12
С_5
С_10
С_16
С_8
С_14
С_15
С_21
С_9
С_20
С_24
С_13
С_2
С_17
С_23
С_28
82.8</p>
      <p>33.9</p>
      <p>Figure 2 illustrates the cartogram of dividing EU and Ukraine into clusters based on the
level of digital tools utilization in the marketing activities of enterprises.</p>
      <p>Based on the provided data and cluster analysis, conclusions can be drawn regarding the
level of digital tools utilization in the marketing activities of enterprises in the countries
within the three clusters:</p>
      <p>Countries (Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Finland, Sweden, Ireland, Malta) are
classified into Cluster I, which demonstrates a high level of digital tools utilization in the
marketing activities of enterprises. These countries exhibit the highest activity in this
aspect, reflected in the high values of the assessed indicators. Located in the northern part
of Europe (except for Malta), they share borders with the Baltic Sea and the North Sea. This
region is renowned for its high level of development and a history of cooperation. An
important characteristic of these countries is their proximity in terms of population density,
high standard of living, and similarity in economic and social models. Additionally, they
frequently collaborate within various international organizations and develop joint
strategies concerning security, economic development, and other aspects of mutual
interest.</p>
      <p>Countries in Cluster II are characterized by a moderate level of utilization of digital tools
in the marketing activities of enterprises. They demonstrate average values of the assessed
indicators.</p>
      <p>Countries in Cluster III (Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, Ukraine) exhibit the lowest level of
utilization of digital tools in the marketing activities of enterprises. They are characterized
by low values of the assessed indicators. These countries are located in Eastern Europe and
share several common characteristics and factors that unite them, including geographic
proximity and historical ties. They hold significant geopolitical importance in the Eastern
European region and often participate in regional and international cooperation and
initiatives to enhance stability and development in the region.</p>
      <p>For the identified clusters of countries, the average values for each indicator for each
cluster have been determined. The results are presented in Table 3. A graphical
representation of the average standardized values of the indicators for each cluster is
shown in Figure 3.</p>
      <p>Based on the average values of indicators for the identified clusters of EU countries and
Ukraine regarding the level of use of digital tools in the marketing activities of enterprises,
conclusions can be drawn:
•
•
•
the average values of indicators for Cluster I indicate a high level of use of digital
tools in the marketing activities of enterprises. These countries are characterized by
the highest average values for almost all eight indicators, indicating their high digital
readiness in the marketing sphere;
the average values of indicators for Cluster II also indicate a moderate level of
readiness for using digital tools in marketing activities. These countries have
average values of indicators higher than those in the third cluster but lower than
those in the first cluster
the average values of indicators for Cluster III indicate the lowest level of utilization
of digital tools in the marketing activities of enterprises among all three clusters.
Countries in this cluster are characterized by the lowest average values of practically
all eight indicators, indicating the need for further development of digital marketing
and implementation of modern tools in the marketing activities of enterprises.</p>
      <p>As we can see, there is a significant difference in the level of digital readiness among the
different clusters of countries. The first cluster demonstrates the highest readiness for using
digital tools in marketing activities, the second cluster has average indicators, while the
third cluster requires improvement in this aspect.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Conclusions</title>
      <p>Cluster analysis has identified three groups of EU countries regarding the level of utilization
of digital tools in the marketing activities of enterprises. Specifically, Cluster I includes
countries with a high level of usage of digital tools in enterprise marketing activities. Cluster
II consists of countries with average utilization of digital tools in marketing activities. And
Cluster III countries have the lowest level of utilization of digital tools in enterprise
marketing activities. It was found that the largest gap is evident in the average values of
almost all assessed indicators for each of the clusters. Only indicators such as x3 – the share
of enterprises whose website facilitates online ordering or booking, and x8 – the share of
enterprises using AI technologies for marketing or sales, do not show significant differences
among countries.</p>
      <p>The overall conclusion demonstrates a significant difference in the level of digital tools
utilization among the clusters of the studied countries. Ukraine is classified into the III
cluster along with countries such as Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania. The comprehensive
analysis of indicators in this cluster indicates that Ukraine has the lowest level of digital
tools utilization in marketing activities among the countries represented in this list.
Specifically, Ukraine has low values across almost all indicators, indicating a lag in the use
of digital tools in marketing compared to other EU countries. This serves as a signal for
Ukraine regarding the necessity of further development and implementation of digital
marketing tools to enhance the competitiveness of enterprises in the international market,
particularly in the context of European Integration, and to improve marketing practices
overall.</p>
      <p>
        Among the limitations of this study, it is worth noting the following: (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) geographic
limitations – the study is confined to Ukraine and European Union countries. This limitation
allowed focusing on the context of Ukraine and European Union countries, providing a
deeper understanding of local peculiarities, legislation, cultural differences, and economic
environments. However, the geographical limitation prevented the consideration of the
unique characteristics of marketing activities in other regions of the world, such as Asia,
North America, or Africa. This limitation may lead to missing potential innovative
approaches and best practices that could be utilized in marketing. For instance, the study
does not account for the rapidly growing influence of Chinese technology companies in the
field of digital marketing, which could be a significant factor for international businesses;
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ) sectoral specificity – the assessment was primarily conducted in the B2B and B2C
services and goods sectors, which may lead to limited representativeness of the results. The
findings may not reflect the wide range of digital tools usage in marketing across various
sectors of the economy.
      </p>
      <p>
        The practical significance of the study lies in several key aspects: (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) the research results
provide businesses with an informational basis for formulating strategies regarding the
utilization of digital tools in marketing activities. Cluster analysis allows for the
identification of groups of enterprises with similar characteristics in the use of digital
instruments and the development of individual strategies for each of them; (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        )
understanding how enterprises utilize digital tools in marketing activities allows for the
identification of the most effective methods of internet marketing and the resources being
utilized. This helps optimize marketing budgets and resources to achieve better results; (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        )
cluster analysis enables the identification of niches and gaps in the utilization of digital tools
in marketing activities compared to competitors. This can facilitate the development of
unique propositions and strategies, allowing enterprises to stand out in the market and
enhance their competitiveness. Therefore, conducting analysis using cluster analysis
method has direct practical significance for enterprises, allowing them to more effectively
utilize digital tools in marketing activities and achieve better results.
      </p>
      <p>
        Further research could focus on studying cultural and regional variations in the use of
digital tools in marketing by enterprises, including comparisons between countries and
regions. Efforts could be directed towards developing new forecasting models to identify
future trends in the use of digital tools in marketing. This would help enterprises prepare
for changes and adapt their strategies accordingly.
[10] A. Kisiołek, O. Karyy, I. Kulyniak, The Concept of a Digital Marketing Communication
Model for Higher Education Institutions, in: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
458 (2022). doi:10.1007/978-981-19-2894-9_6.
[11] V. Koval, N. Kovshun, O. Plekhanova, S. Kvitka, O. Haran, The role of interactive
marketing in agricultural investment attraction, in: Proceedings of the International
Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology
Management, SGEM’2019, Sofia, pp. 877–884. doi:10.5593/sgem2019/5.3/S21.111.
[12] M. Lovrić, R. da Re, E. Vidale, D. Pettenella, R. Mavsar, Social network analysis as a tool
for the analysis of international trade of wood and non-wood forest products, Forest
Policy and Economics 86 (2018): 45–66. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.006.
[13] V. Chychun, N. Chaplynska, O. Shpatakova, A. Pankova, V. Saienko, Effective
management in the remote work environment, Journal of System and Management
Sciences 13(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ) (2023): 244–257. doi:10.33168/JSMS.2023.0317.
[14] O. Prokopenko, L. Shmorgun, V. Kushniruk, M. Prokopenko, M. Slatvinska, L. Huliaieva,
Business process efficiency in a digital economy, International Journal of Management
11(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ) (2020): 122-132. doi:10.34218/IJM.11.3.2020.014.
[15] K. Doroshkevych, O. Maslak, U. Motorniuk, V. Zhezhukha, M. Terebuh, O. Malinovska,
The choice of tactical approaches to the implementation of enterprise strategy in terms
of innovative development, Estudios de Economia Aplicada 39(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ) (2021).
doi:10.25115/eea.v39i7.4937.
[16] X. Zhang, H. Zhang, Construction of Mathematical Model of Enterprise Marketing
Economic Analysis Based on Neutral Analytic Hierarchy Process, Mobile Information
Systems (2022). doi:10.1155/2022/3230056.
[17] L. Ližbetinová, P. Štarchoň, S. Lorincová, D. Weberová, P. Pruša, Application of cluster
analysis in marketing communications in small and medium-sized enterprises: An
empirical study in the Slovak Republic, Sustainability 11(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ) (2019).
doi:10.3390/su11082302.
[18] P. S. Ray, H. Aiyappan, M. E. Elam, T. W. Merritt, (2005). Application of cluster analysis
in marketing management, International Journal of Industrial Engineering : Theory
Applications and Practice 12(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ) (2005): 127–133.
[19] H. Wang, J. Wang, Z. Zhong, Research on precision marketing strategy based on cluster
analysis algorithm, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on E-Commerce
and Internet Technology, ECIT’2020, Atlantic Press, Dordrecht, 2020, pp. 208–211.
doi:10.1109/ECIT50008.2020.00054.
[20] N. Kovshun, V. Solodkyy, V. Kostrychenko, Z. Los, S. Moshchych, Using clustering to
predict the effectiveness of innovative environmental protection technologies, IOP
Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1269(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ):012015 (2023).
[21] T. Reutterer, D. Dan, Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research, Handbook of Market
      </p>
      <p>
        Research, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2021. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_11.
[22] N. Shpak, I. Kulyniak, I. Novakivskyi, I. Oleksiv, Clusterization in Tourism Development
Level’s Assessment of Regions: Example of Ukraine, Journal of Tourism and Services
14(26) (2023): 45–56. doi:10.29036/jots.v14i26.444.
[23] State Statistics Service of Ukraine, Economic statistics / Economic activity /
Information society, 2024. URL:
https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/menu/menu_u/zv.htm.
[24] Eurostat, Digital Intensity Index, 2024. URL:
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/isoc_e_dii_esmsip2.htm.
[25] I. Matyushenko, K. Trofimchenko, V. Ryeznikov, O. Prokopenko, S. Hlibko, Y. Krykhtina,
Innovation and Investment Mechanism for Ensuring the Technological
Competitiveness of Ukraine in the Digital Economy, Journal of Global Business and
Technology 18(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ) (2022): 1–34.
[26] I. O. Bashynska, Using SMM by industrial enterprises, Actual Problems of Economics
12(186) (2016): 360–369.
[27] O. Roieva, S. Oneshko, N. Sulima, V. Saienko, A. Makurin, Identification of digitalization
as a direction of innovative development of modern enterprise, Financial and credit
activity: problems of theory and practice 1(48) (2023): 312–325.
doi:10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3968.
[28] Eurostat, Websites and functionalities by size class of enterprise, 2024. URL:
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/isoc_ciweb/default/table?lang=en.
[29] M. Malchyk, O. Popko, I. Oplachko, I. Adasiuk, O. Martyniuk, Brand Promotion Strategy
in the Internet Services Market, Scientific Horizons 24(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ) (2022): 100–108.
doi:10.48077/scihor.24(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ).2021.100-108.
[30] Eurostat, Social media use by type, internet advertising and size class of enterprise,
2024. URL:
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/isoc_cismt/default/table?lang=en.
[31] L. Verbivska, O. Zhuk, O. Ievsieieva, T. Kuchmiiova, V. Saienko, The role of e-commerce
in stimulating innovative business development in the conditions of European
integration, Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice 3(50) (2023):
330–340. doi:10.55643/fcaptp.3.50.2023.3930.
[32] M. Potwora, I. Zakryzhevska, A. Mostova, V. Kyrkovskyi, V. Saienko, Marketing
strategies in e-commerce: personalised content, recommendations, and increased
customer trust, Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice 5(52)
(2023): 562–573. doi:10.55643/fcaptp.5.52.2023.4190.
[33] Eurostat, Data browser, 2024. URL:
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/explore/all/all_themes.
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Halkiv</surname>
          </string-name>
          , I. Kulyniak,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Shevchuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Kucher</surname>
          </string-name>
          , T. Horbenko,
          <article-title>Information and Technological Support of Enterprise Management: Diagnostics of Crisis Situations</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies</source>
          , ACIT'
          <year>2021</year>
          , IEEE, Deggendorf,
          <year>2021</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>309</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>312</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/ACIT52158.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>9548354</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Bashynska</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Sarafanov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Manikaeva</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Research and Development of a Modern Deep Learning Model for Emotional Analysis Management of Text Data</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Applied Sciences</source>
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ):
          <year>1952</year>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/app14051952.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Veres</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Ilchuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Kots</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Big Data Analysis on the Enterprises' Business Activity Under the COVID-19 Conditions</article-title>
          , in
          <source>: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems</source>
          , Colins'
          <year>2023</year>
          , CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Kharkiv,
          <year>2023</year>
          ,
          <volume>3403</volume>
          , pp.
          <fpage>362</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>374</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Androniceanu</surname>
          </string-name>
          , I. Georgescu,
          <string-name>
            <surname>C. O.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Mirică (Dumitrescu), Social protection in Europe, a comparative and correlative research</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Administratie si Management Public</source>
          <volume>38</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ):
          <fpage>31</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>45</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .24818/amp/
          <year>2022</year>
          .38-
          <fpage>02</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Shpak</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Karpyak</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Rybytska</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Gvozd</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Sroka</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Assessing the business models of Ukrainian IT companies</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Forum Scientiae Oeconomia</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2023</year>
          ):
          <fpage>13</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>48</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .23762/FSO_VOL11_NO1_
          <fpage>2</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Alonso-Garcia</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Pablo-Marti</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Núñez-Barriopedro</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Cuesta-Valiño</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Digitalization in B2B marketing: omnichannel management from a PLS-SEM approach</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing</source>
          <volume>38</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2023</year>
          ):
          <fpage>317</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>336</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1108/JBIM-09- 2021-0421.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Kljucnikov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Civelek</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Supekova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The innovative posture of SMEs depends on the usage of marketing tools</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Serbian Journal of Management</source>
          <volume>17</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2022</year>
          ):
          <fpage>73</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>84</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .5937/sjm17-
          <fpage>32902</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Prokopenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Omelyanenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Marketing aspect of the innovation communications development</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Innovative Marketing</source>
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2018</year>
          ):
          <fpage>41</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>49</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .21511/im.
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ).
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <volume>05</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Bondarenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Rusavska</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Niziaieva</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Manushkina</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Kachanova</surname>
          </string-name>
          , U. Ivaniuk,
          <article-title>Digital logistics in flow management in tourism</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Information Technology Management</source>
          <volume>13</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ):
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>21</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .22059/JITM.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>80734</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>