<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Machine Learning for Assessing StartUp Investment Attractiveness</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nataliia Dziubanovska</string-name>
          <email>n.dziubanovska@wunu.edu.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vadym Maslii</string-name>
          <email>v.maslii@wunu.edu.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Oleksandr Shekhanin</string-name>
          <email>shekhanin2022@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Serhii Protsyk</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Western Ukrainian National University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>11 Lvivska Str., Ternopil, 46009</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The primary objective of this study is to utilize machine learning (ML) methods for analyzing and predicting the success of startups, particularly focusing on the IT sector. This article explores the application of ML methods for assessing the investment attractiveness of startups based on data from the crowdfunding platform Kickstarter. An analysis of the dataset covering various aspects of projects, such as funding volume, raised funds, project category, number of backers, and its status, is conducted. From all the provided data, a dataset focused on startups from the Technology category is formed, reflecting the importance of the study in the context of innovation and technological development. The application of classification methods, including decision trees, allows predicting the success or failure of a startup with high accuracy based on input data. The findings of this study can be valuable for investors, entrepreneurs, and researchers interested in risks and opportunities in the field of investing in innovative projects.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;classification</kwd>
        <kwd>decision tree</kwd>
        <kwd>investment</kwd>
        <kwd>Kickstarter</kwd>
        <kwd>machine learning</kwd>
        <kwd>startup</kwd>
        <kwd>1</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>The beginning of the 21st century is characterized by the emergence of a fundamentally new
phenomenon in the economies of countries – startups. Every year, a significant number of new
innovative companies appear, which significantly change the global economy and, thanks to their
inventions, simultaneously ensure dynamic development and competitiveness of the economy of
individual countries. Maximizing profit, achieved through the implementation of innovative
technological solutions, and attracting venture foreign capital to finance the most attractive
startups, has a positive impact on GDP growth, which ultimately affects the income level of the
entire society.</p>
      <p>In Ukraine, despite the full-scale war with Russia, the main drivers of the domestic economy
have become IT companies and technological startups. As experts note, “according to the results
of nine months of 2022, the industry showed growth of 13%, and the market volume amounted
to almost $5.5 billion.” Ukrainian technological startups are actively working on various
innovative projects in such areas as artificial intelligence, blockchain, fintech, e-commerce, and
many others. These companies are mostly aimed at the global market and have ambitions to
become leaders in their fields.</p>
      <p>
        The Ukrainian startup ecosystem began to form about 10 years ago and continues to be in the
stage of formation. The main source of funding is bootstrapping (own funds), however, in
conditions of war, economic difficulties, and other adverse factors, both the profits of startups
and the personal savings of founders have significantly decreased. This forces domestic
developers to enter international markets in search of investors and consumers [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>0000-0002-8441-5216 (N. Dziubanovska); 0000-0002-9672-9669 (V. Maslii); 0009-0005-3561-4242
(O. Shekhanin); 0009-0009-8395-8946 (S. Protsyk)
© 2024 Copyright for this paper by its authors.</p>
      <p>Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).</p>
      <p>CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)</p>
      <p>At the same time, the growing number of business initiatives provides investors with wide
opportunities for investment, however, the process of assessing the potential profitability of a
startup can be complex and risky. In the world of modern technologies, startups play a key role
in shaping the economic landscape. They represent a source of innovation and stimulate
competitiveness. However, considering such investment opportunities, financial participants
face significant instability and uncertainty associated with the risks accompanying the startup
development process. Therefore, the use of ML methods for analyzing and predicting the success
of startups becomes an important tool for investors, helping them make informed decisions
regarding capital placement.</p>
      <p>This research seeks to address the pressing need for robust tools that can assist investors in
making informed decisions regarding capital allocation in the dynamic and uncertain
environment of startup investment.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Literature review</title>
      <p>
        In the domestic scientific literature, considerable attention is devoted to the development of
startups and the forms of their financing. In particular, in the work of O. Kurchenko [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], the results
of a survey of Ukrainian startups that were in the top 100 in 2014 are presented. It was found
that 70% of companies used their own funds as startup capital, so it was logically assumed that
this category of startups requires the implementation of a state support program. A. Dub and M.
Khlopetska [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] focus on the main sources of startup financing in conditions of instability and
distinguish such types of main investors in startups: business angels, business accelerators
(business incubators), and venture funds. K. Raputa [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] examines the importance of venture
financing as a source of investment for startups; determines the stages at which financing takes
place and the criteria for making investment decisions. L. Boltianska, L. Andreeva, and O. Lysak
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] note that in conditions of economic instability, the issue of finding sources of financing for
Ukrainian startups is relevant. The authors characterize the most common financing models:
personal investments, F&amp;F, venture capital, business angels, business incubators, grants, bank
loans, and crowdfunding. M. Dyba and O. Hernego [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ] point out that the role of crowdfunding
technologies is increasing at both the global and national levels. N. Versal and Y. Dudnyk [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ], based
on the use of statistical-economic methods, identified trends in the development of crowdfunding
in various regions of the world and clarified the factors influencing this development. A.
Schwienbacher and V. Larralde [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] identify crowdfunding as a competition, most often open on
the Internet, aimed at obtaining financial resources to achieve specific goals. According to this
investment scheme, investors, through specialized internet platforms or crowdfunding
platforms, finance new or existing startups. T. Esen, M. S. Dahl, and O. Sorenson [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ], based on the
evaluation of linear probability models (LPM) built on data characterizing startup founder teams,
identified which attribute most accurately predicts financing. B. Yin and J. Luo [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ] analyzed
datasets of real startup profiles submitted to the first stage of a startup accelerator in Southeast
Asia; four criteria of value were identified, which were subsequently used to build regression
models predicting screening and selection outcomes; the researchers concluded that better
understanding of decision criteria could improve the decision-making process regarding startup
investments.
      </p>
      <p>Given that significant volumes of information characterizing projects are expressed not only
in attribute features but also in quantitative characteristics, there is a need for the application of
ML – a subfield of artificial intelligence that allows identifying investment-attractive objects with
a high probability of success. This applied aspect of selecting startups for financing is
insufficiently researched.</p>
      <p>Thus, the purpose of the article is to investigate the possibilities of applying ML algorithms to
select investment-attractive objects in the process of crowdfunding financing.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Methodology</title>
      <p>When exploring the possibility of using ML methods for investment decision-making, the most
intuitive algorithm for understanding and interpretation – decision tree – was applied. This
method is used for classification and regression based on input feature values. Decision trees can
work with different types of data, including categorical and numerical, making them flexible for
use in various situations.</p>
      <p>The main task was to divide startups into two categories: successful and unsuccessful, in order
to analyze their performance and attractiveness to investors. The result of this study was the
creation of a trained decision tree model capable of classifying new startups based on their
characteristics. This provides investors with the opportunity to make informed decisions about
investing in new projects, taking into account the likelihood of their success or failure.</p>
      <p>The task was implemented using the DecisionTreeClassifier classifier from the Scikit-learn
library in Python. It is used to build a classification model based on data using the decision tree
algorithm and is responsible for creating and training the model based on input data and
responses. The feature selection is based on the calculation of the Gini coefficient. When training
the model, a random number generator is applied, which determines the randomness of various
aspects of the process and ensures greater variability and reliability of the model results.</p>
      <p>The trained decision tree model allows for the use of objective criteria for classifying startups,
ensuring the rationale behind the decisions made. This enables risk reduction and increases the
effectiveness of the investment portfolio by directing capital towards directions with the highest
potential for success.</p>
      <p>
        For training the decision tree model, data from Kickstarter Projects [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ] were used. This
dataset contains information about various startups seeking funding through the crowdfunding
platform Kickstarter. It includes important characteristics such as country, category, funding goal,
pledged amount, number of backers, project status, and others. This approach to analyzing
startups serves as an additional tool for investors seeking opportunities for smart capital
allocation and increasing its profitability. Utilizing data from Kickstarter Projects allows for
considering diverse factors and assessing the potential success of each specific startup.
      </p>
      <p>The Kickstarter Projects dataset contains information about 374,853 startups from various
categories (‘Fashion’, ‘Film &amp; Video’, ‘Art’, ‘Technology’, ‘Journalism’, ‘Publishing’, ‘Theatre’,
‘Music’, ‘Photography’, ‘Games’, ‘Design’, ‘Food’, ‘Crafts’, ‘Comics’, ‘Dance’), different countries
(‘United States’, ‘United Kingdom’, ‘Canada’, ‘Australia’, ‘New Zealand’, ‘Netherlands’, ‘Sweden’,
‘Denmark’, ‘Norway’, ‘Ireland’, ‘Germany’, ‘France’, ‘Spain’, ‘Belgium’, ‘Italy’, ‘Switzerland’,
‘Austria’, ‘Luxembourg’, ‘Singapore’, ‘Hong Kong’, ‘Mexico’, ‘Japan’), and various states (‘Failed’,
‘Successful’, ‘Cancelled’, ‘Suspended’, ‘Live’), among others (Figure 1).</p>
      <p>Rapid technological advancement in the modern world dictates the pace of life and business
standards. These technologies play a key role in all aspects of our lives, from communications and
media to business and science. This has led to the narrowing of the existing database to startups
in the Technology category (32, 562). These startups are often characterized by innovative
approaches and products that open up new opportunities for the market. Due to their
innovativeness, technology startups have great potential to attract investments and interest from
clients. Another important advantage is the ability to scale the business, creating a sustainable
and profitable model. Technological solutions allow for efficient interaction with customers and
partners on a global scale, promoting rapid business growth. Successful technology startups
typically have a team with relevant expertise and experience, facilitating the effective
implementation of innovative solutions and addressing complex tasks.</p>
      <p>To build the ML model, we selected startups with the status ‘Failed’ and ‘Successful’ (27, 046).
This is due to their significant impact on the final outcome. ‘Failed’ indicates project failure, which
is important for studying the reasons for failure and avoiding similar mistakes in the future. On
the other hand, ‘Successful’ signifies successful completion of the startup, providing valuable
information for studying successful strategies and practices. A detailed study of these two
statuses will provide a complete picture of the dynamics of success and failure in the startup
sphere. The statuses ‘Cancelled’, ‘Suspended’, and ‘Live’ also have their importance in
understanding the dynamics of startups, but in this case, they can be considered less significant
for analysis compared to ‘Failed’ and ‘Successful’. ‘Cancelled’ indicates that the startup was
cancelled before achieving the goal, which may be the result of strategic or financial obstacles.
‘Suspended’ means temporary suspension of the project, which may be caused by external factors
such as legal or financial problems. ‘Live’ indicates that the startup is still in the active phase of
fundraising or project implementation, and this information may be less representative for
analysis since the project’s outcome is not yet known. Thus, focusing on ‘Failed’ and ‘Successful’
will allow us to concentrate on key aspects of startup success and failure. Visualizing the number
of ‘Failed’ and ‘Successful’ startups in the form of a histogram will highlight the difference in size
between the two categories (Figure 2).</p>
      <p>Considering the predominant number of ‘Failed’ startups, investigating the reasons for their
failure is particularly relevant. Using the decision tree method allows obtaining valuable insights
into the factors influencing the success of startups and can be applied as an additional tool in the
decision-making process in business and investments.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Results</title>
      <p>Based on the newly formed dataset of startups in the ‘Technology’ category with the status
‘Failed’ and ‘Successful’, we construct a decision tree. The main features selected are ‘Goal’,
‘Pledged’, and ‘Backers’. Additionally, to obtain more informative insights from the 27, 046
startups, we select those with ‘Pledged’&gt;0 and ‘Backers’&gt;0. Thus, the dataset is reduced to 21, 636
entries.</p>
      <p>Reviewing a segment of the decision tree (Figure 3) can help better understand the process of
node formation and decision-making in the ML model.</p>
      <p>While analyzing the segment, important features used for data splitting can be identified, along
with considering the criteria for selecting the optimal split. Investigating the structure of the tree
segment can also highlight the significance of each node in decision-making and influence the
final classification outcome. This approach allows for a deeper understanding of the internal
mechanism of the decision tree and its interaction with the input data.</p>
      <p>To assess the model’s ability to distinguish between the ‘Failed’ and ‘Successful’ classes, we
construct the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (Figure 4) and compute the Area
Under the Curve (AUC).</p>
      <p>The value of the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the ROC curve is 0.97. This high value, close to
1, indicates the model’s excellent ability to distinguish between the ‘Failed’ and ‘Successful’
classes. Such a high AUC value confirms the model’s high accuracy in prediction.</p>
      <p>Now that we have a trained ML model, we can use it to predict the class of new objects by
inputting their characteristics. This allows us to effectively classify new data and use the model
in practical situations for decision-making.</p>
      <p>For example, based on our dataset and key characteristics, providing the values for five new
startups: ‘Goal’: [245000, 750000, 200000, 120000, 250000], ‘Pledged’: [300000, 11000, 300000,
7000, 3000], ‘Backers’: [850,20,100,3000,150], we obtain the predicted class values for their
belonging to the respective class. In our case – Predicted Classes: [‘Successful’ ‘Failed’ ‘Successful’
‘Failed’ ‘Failed’]. Thus, using this tool for investment decision-making allows for efficiently
assessing the potential success of new projects and developing optimal investment strategies.</p>
      <p>Furthermore, having a ready ML model for classifying startups into ‘Failed’ and ‘Successful’
allows us to set additional constraints for selected characteristics or add new criteria for
assessing their investment attractiveness. For instance, if we are interested in startups with a
‘Goal’ &gt; 100000, we add this constraint to form a new database (2089) and build a new decision
tree (Figure 5). Based on this, we can also test new projects and determine their likely belonging
to one of the two classes. Moreover, by continuously refining and updating our ML model with
new data, we can enhance its predictive accuracy and adapt it to evolving market trends.
Additionally, leveraging advanced analytics tools and techniques can provide deeper insights into
the underlying factors driving startup success or failure, empowering investors to make more
informed decisions. This iterative process of analysis and refinement fosters a dynamic approach
to investment strategy, optimizing returns and mitigating risks in the ever-changing landscape of
startup ventures.</p>
      <p>Thus, the ability to establish additional conditions and constraints enhances the accuracy of
the model and ensures a more objective analysis of investment opportunities. This approach
helps make informed decisions regarding the allocation of investment resources and reduces the
risk of financial losses.</p>
      <p>
        ML, as noted by Catalyst Fund experts, has great potential to become a powerful and effective
decision-making tool for investors, but this subfield of artificial intelligence is still far from perfect
or suitable as a black box. ML helps investors check their biases, identified using more reliable
data, and improve operational efficiency. Thus, valuable human time can be spent on an
important part of due diligence, where intuition and prudence matter. Whether ML will become
so super intelligent as to become the sole decision-making tool for investors in the early stages of
startup funding, only time will tell [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Therefore, considering startups as an investment object, especially early-stage startups,
investors strive to conduct as thorough due diligence as possible. To make it fairer and with
minimal time costs, it is advisable to apply ML. By combining quantitative characteristics of
startups from various platforms, ML algorithms allow for unbiased evaluation of investment
ideas and prospects.</p>
      <p>The model obtained in the study, built based on decision tree, can be useful for various groups
of interested parties. For example, investors and financial analysts can use this data to make
investment decisions, assessing the potential success of startups and risks. Entrepreneurs can
analyze successful and unsuccessful startups to understand the factors influencing their success
and improve their own projects. Researchers can use this data to analyze trends in the startup
world and technology development. Government structures and regulatory bodies can use this
data to evaluate the effectiveness of policies and programs supporting startups. Students and
researchers can use this data for academic research and education. Also, this decision tree model
can be used both as a ready-made database and as an example for creating their own models
based on past implemented projects, methodologies, and criteria that meet specific user needs.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Shkil</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Funding of Ukrainian startups during the war: where to look for investments</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2022</year>
          . URL: https://ain.ua/
          <year>2022</year>
          /11/16/finansuvannya-ukrayinskyh
          <article-title>-startapiv-pid-chas-vijny/</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Kurchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Formation and development of startups in Ukraine: problems and solutions</article-title>
          .
          <source>Ukrainian society. №</source>
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <issue>57</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2016</year>
          ):
          <fpage>80</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>87</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Dub</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Khlopetska</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Sources of funding for startups and opportunities to attract them in Ukraine. Socio-economic problems of the modern period of Ukraine</article-title>
          . Volume
          <volume>1</volume>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ):
          <fpage>87</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>92</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Raputa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Directions for improving the mechanism of venture financing of startups in Ukraine</article-title>
          .
          <source>Investments: practice and experience. №2</source>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ):
          <fpage>56</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>63</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Boltianska</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Andreieva</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Lysak</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Idea selection and startup financing. Collection of scientific works of the Dmytro Motornyi Tavri State Agro-Technological University (economic sciences)</article-title>
          . №
          <volume>1</volume>
          (
          <issue>43</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2021</year>
          ):
          <fpage>5</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>12</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Dyba</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Herneho</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Global trends and development potential of the crowdfunding market in Ukraine. Ukraine economy</article-title>
          . №
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <issue>699</issue>
          ). (
          <year>2020</year>
          ):
          <fpage>66</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>79</lpage>
          . URL: https://doi.org/ 10.15407/economyukr.
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <volume>02</volume>
          .066.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Versal</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Ya. Dudnyk,
          <article-title>Crowdfunding as an alternative FINTECH ecosystem in the financial market</article-title>
          .
          <source>Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv</source>
          National University. №
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <issue>217</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2021</year>
          ):
          <fpage>26</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>37</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schwienbacher</surname>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Larralde</surname>
            <given-names>B</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Crowdfunding of small entrepreneurial ventures</article-title>
          .
          <source>SSRN Electronic Journal</source>
          .
          <year>2010</year>
          , URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ ID1699183_code301672.pdf
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Tekin</given-names>
            <surname>Esen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Michael S. Dahl, Olav Sorenson,
          <article-title>Jockeys, horses or teams? The selection of startups by venture capitalists</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Business Venturing Insights</source>
          . Volume
          <volume>19</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          ). URL: https://doi.org/10.016/j.bvi.
          <year>2023</year>
          .e00383.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bangqi</surname>
            <given-names>Yin</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Jianxi Luo,
          <article-title>How Do Accelerators Select Startups? Shifting Decision Criteria Across Stages</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Volume 65 Issue</source>
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ):
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>16</lpage>
          . URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <volume>2791501</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <article-title>Kickstarter projects</article-title>
          . Kaggle. URL: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ulrikthygepedersen/kickstarter-projects
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kelly</surname>
            <given-names>Nguyen</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>How Can Investors Use Machine Learning to Pick the Right Startups? 2017</article-title>
          . URL: https://bfaglobal.com/catalyst-fund/insights/how
          <article-title>-can-investors-use-machinelearning-to-pick-the-right-startups/</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>