<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>M. Dilai);</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>A computer-aided study of the ideational metafunction in “The Penelopiad” by Margaret Atwood</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Marianna Dilai</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Iryna Dilai</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Iryna Khomytska</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Olesya Tatarovska</string-name>
          <email>olesya.tatarovska@lnu.edu.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Ivan Franko National University of Lviv</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Universytetska Street, 1, Lviv, 79000</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Lviv Polytechnic National University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Stepan Bandera Street, 12, Lviv, 79013</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <volume>000</volume>
      <fpage>0</fpage>
      <lpage>0001</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The paper seeks to explore computer-aided techniques aimed at informing and facilitating literary text analysis. The text is being analyzed in terms of the realization of the ideational metafunction, defined within the framework of Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG) as the one aimed at construing human experience through the deployment of six types of processes: material, verbal, mental, behavioral, existential, and relational. Such an experience construal is based on the functional grammatical category of transitivity, which transfers the process from the subject to the object and has different degrees depending on the semantics of the process. The ideational metafunction is best manifested in narratives, which generally have linear structure and presuppose consecutive alternation of processes. The computer-aided analysis is conducted on the material of the novel “The Penelopiad” by M. Atwood with the use of the Voyant Corpus Tools. The Pearson correlation coefficient and data clustering are applied to establish inner semantic and structural relations within the narrative. The conducted statistical text analysis revealed the peculiarities of the distribution of different types of processes throughout the text.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG)</kwd>
        <kwd>ideational metafunction</kwd>
        <kwd>process</kwd>
        <kwd>narrative</kwd>
        <kwd>statistical text analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>clustering1</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>The application of computational techniques to the production and processing of natural
language is the key task of AI. Computer-aided text analysis has been rapidly developing
due to the implementation of more and more sophisticated algorithms and the elaboration
of more advanced software. The automated analysis of texts is, on the one hand, a
prerequisite of an objective discourse analysis capable of revealing latent language
dimensions; on the other hand, it serves as the indispensable basis for the emergence of AI
text-generating applications. In this respect, the relevance of computer-aided literary text
analysis cannot be underestimated.</p>
      <p>The goal of this study is to investigate how meanings are construed in the narrative by
conducting the computer-aided analysis of the ideational metafunction realization
exemplified by the novel “The Penelopiad” by Margaret Atwood.</p>
      <p>The ideational language metafunction is one of the three main language metafunctions
discerned by the founding father of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL),
Michael A. K. Halliday. It is associated with the perception of text as a reflection of human
experience.</p>
      <p>
        We attempt to trace the ideational metafunction in the construal of a narrator's
experience and convey the ideas presented through language in the novel under study.
According to the tenets of SFG, the linguistic manifestation of the ideational metafunction is
ensured by different alternating types of processes (clauses) in the text and the functional
grammatic category, which reflects the unfolding of the process through time, its
transference from the subject to the object is transitivity [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>The tasks of the attempted computer-aided ideational metafunctional analysis of the
narrative are as follows:
•
•
•
•</p>
      <p>To elaborate and test a transferrable computer-aided methodology of the analysis of
different process types in the text based on verbs as their language manifestations.
To conduct the statistical analysis of the distribution of the verbs in the narrative
under study.</p>
      <p>To account for the quantitative findings, making conclusions and generalizations
regarding the realization of the ideational metafunction in “The Peneloliad” by
M. Atwood.</p>
      <p>To assess the advantages and shortcomings of the methodology applied and suggest
the ways of its upgrading.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Related works</title>
      <p>
        The related works for this study have been mostly written within the scope of the Systemic
Functional Grammar approach by M. A. K. Halliday. In “An Introduction to Functional
Grammar,” he holds that “The aim of Systemic Functional Grammar has been to construct a
grammar for the purpose of text analysis: one that would make it possible to say sensible
and useful things about any text, spoken or written, in modern English” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. The theory
appears to be consistent and robust, applicable for computational text processing, and that
is why experiencing a surge of interest in modern computational linguistics [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3 ref4 ref5 ref6 ref7">2-7</xref>
        ]. Within
the SFG framework, a text is viewed as the basic unit of semantics, language use in context,
and the process of construing meaning in context [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        M. A. K. Halliday proposes three main language metafunctions representing functional
grammatical categories used for the linguistic descriptions in SFL: the ideational, the
interpersonal, and the textual [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref8">1, 8</xref>
        ]. The ideational metafunction is ensured by the
functional grammatical category of transitivity, which transfers the action to the object. It
reflects the construal of human experience through the alternation of different types of
processes (clauses) in text. M. A. К. Halliday claimed that the prototypical form of the ‘outer’
experience is that of actions and events [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The process is understood as a way of reflecting
on experience, of imposing a linguistic order on the experience of infinite variations in the
flow of events. Processes of different types indicate the variability of experience construal
in the text and, accordingly, the specifics of the realization of the ideational metafunction of
language [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. The system of transitivity provides lexicogrammatical resources for
construing the mental representation of the process as a configuration of all the related
elements.
      </p>
      <p>
        The mental representation of the process in SFG is a figure (‘configuration frame’),
defined as “a quantum of change in the flow of events that construe human experience” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
The figure consists of the process that unfolds through time (realized by a predicate verb)
and participants directly involved in this process (verb arguments); in addition, there may
be attendant circumstances of time, place, cause, manner of action, etc.
      </p>
      <p>
        The significance of the predicate-argument structure has been emphasized by other
scholars in terms of verb semantics study resulting in its representation as a frame
(Ch. Fillmore) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. Moreover, its implications go beyond the level of a sentence (clause): the
predicate-actant model was proposed by A. J. Greimas to study the structure of the narrative
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        From the semiotic standpoint, the nature of the process and the narrative is alike. In fact,
the narrative is a process. C. Bremond holds that the narrative is regulated by the same rules
as those which control human thought and action [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]. Modern cognitive linguist
R. Langacker defines a process as a consecutive mental scanning of states changing over
time [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]. It echoes the definition of the narrative as a temporal structure containing the
change of the situation or state [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ]. According to L. Polanyi-Bovditch, the narrative is built
of two structures: a temporal structure that outlines the progression of the narrative in
time, representing a series of events that occur in sequence, and a durational, descriptive
structure that represents the spatial, characterization, and durational context for which the
temporal structure marks time and changes of state [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ]. Events have been defined by
M. Bal as “the transition from one state to another state caused or experienced by actors,”
where “the word 'transition' stresses the fact that the event is a process, an alteration” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        In Systemic Functional Linguistics, the category of transitivity forms a continuum rather
than binary oppositions, as in traditional grammar. The transitivity continuum is based on
semantics which determines to what extent an action affects its object. Therefore, some
verbs, such as see, have low transitivity, and some, such as kill, have high transitivity. Hopper
and Thompson (1980) proposed semantic and formal features that determine the degree of
transitivity [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ]. According to them, actions are transferred, but states are not: in I hugged
Sally something happened to Sally, in I like Sally, Sally was not affected [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ]. A characteristic
discourse function of transitivity is that high transitivity indicates foregrounding, while low
transitivity indicates backgrounding [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Transitivity patterns represent the encoding of experiential meanings: meaning about
the world and about experience [17]. The transitivity analysis is deemed significant for
exploring themes and character construction in a narrative discourse by analyzing language
choices used by the authors [18].</p>
      <p>The first study of transitivity in literary text was conducted by M. A. K. Halliday himself
in 1981: he investigated the novel “The Inheritors” by William Golding [19]. Nowadays,
more and more research is being done into the study of transitivity and the ideational
metafunction in discourse. For example, researchers have identified ideational
metafunctional patterns found in the lexicogrammar of Joseph Conrad’s “Heart of Darkness”
and have noted the author’s use of foregrounding [17].</p>
      <p>The transitivity analysis has also been used in media studies to show how language is
used in media to construct social reality [20]. Some studies also highlighted the variation in
ideational functions in different languages [21].</p>
      <p>Since the advent of the twenty-first century, the use of computational tools to study
linguistic features of text has grown exponentially. A number of computer-aided text
analysis tools have proved to be quite efficient in terms of fast and objective literary text
feature analysis. Bhatti et al. (2019) examined frequent transitivity elements in Samuel
Beckett’s “Waiting for Godot” with the application of the UAM Corpus Tool [22].</p>
      <p>The narrative fiction “Kew Gardens” by Virginia Woolf was also analyzed with the use of
the UAM Corpus Tool by Ammara et al. (2019), outlining different types of processes
(clauses) in the novel and providing the statistics of their types, subtypes as well as
participants, circumstances, configurations [23]. Another study by Ammara et al. (2019) on
the transitivity analysis of “To the Lighthouse” by Virginia Woolf made use of the
concordances and corpus frequencies based on the AntConc corpus toolkit [24].</p>
      <p>A variety of statistical measures have been used to analyze texts. An instance of the
efficient application of the Pearson correlation coefficient in studying relations between the
words that contribute to the overall meaning of a literary text exemplified by A. Byatt’s
novels “Children’s Book” and “Possession” is the paper by Melnychuk et al. (2023) [25]. The
authors acknowledge the pivotal role of verbs in building a narrative and apply the Voyant
Tools to conduct the computer-based discourse analysis.</p>
      <p>Despite the vivid interest in the study of the ideational metafunction in the narrative and
the transitivity analysis, the previous research has not addressed the way the narrative
unfolds: the sequence, alternation, overlap of different process types and their uneven
distribution across the body of the text, especially with the aid of modern computational
technologies.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Methods and material</title>
      <p>
        The methodology of this study is based on the theoretical foundations of the Systemic
Functional Grammar, namely on the typology (or rather topology) of processes in a closed
semantic space proposed by M. A. K. Halliday, who identified six types of processes, the
boundaries of which are blurred [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]:
1. Material processes construct “a quantum of change in the flow of events that occurs
through the input of energy” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The source of energy is the Actor, an active subject.
There are transitive material processes (doings) and intransitive material processes
(happenings). The transitive material processes involve another participant, the
Goal (the Patient), towards which the input is applied.
2. Mental processes describe the experience of human consciousness. As a result, the
subject of a mental process is always a conscious being, the Senser. The following
subtypes of mental processes are distinguished: emotional, cognitive, perceptual,
and desiderative. Mental processes have been studied in detail in linguistics as
psychological (psych) predicates where the main argument is the Experiencer,
which can take the position of both the subject and object.
3. Relational processes serve to characterize or identify entities and are realized by the
verb be in the simple present or past tense. There are three types of relations:
intensive (x is a), possessive (x has a), and circumstantial (x is at a). Each type has
two modes of being: attributive and identifying, which function within the category
of transitivity. The identifying mode is reversible, x and a can be swapped: for
example, Sarah is the leader/ the leader is Sarah. The attributive mode, on the other
hand, is not reversible: Sarah is wise [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. In the attributive mode, the following roles
of subjects are distinguished: the Attribute and the Carrier. In the identifying mode,
the roles of the Identifier and the Identified are distinguished.
4. Existential processes represent the existence of something or someone, introduce
participants into the narrative: be (in the structures There is/are/was/were...), exist,
etc. The role of the subject is called the Existant.
5. Behavioral processes describe physiological and psychological behavior, normally
typical of people: breathe, cough, smile, dream, stare, etc. The role of the subject is
called the Behaver.
6. Verbal processes are speech processes whose function is to build a narrative
through the introduction of dialogues. They always have a speaker as a participant
(the Sayer) and may have an addressee participant (the Receiver) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The process types will change as the narrative unfolds. As a rule, existential and
relational processes will prevail at the beginning of the narrative, while the plot is built from
material processes [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. An interiorized narrative is mainly built with the help of mental
processes [26], while an exteriorized narrative is built with the help of verbal processes.
The processes are mainly represented by verbs belonging to the respective lexicosemantic
groups.
      </p>
      <p>Having considered the theoretical and methodological prerequisites for studying the
structure of the narrative through the employment of different types of process as quanta
of change in its texture, we attempt to study the realization of the ideational metafunction
(the construal of the narrator's experience) exemplified by M. Atwood's novel “The
Penelopiad” [27].</p>
      <p>
        "The Penelopiad” (2005) is a postmodern feminist novel by the famous contemporary
Canadian author Margaret Atwood, written as a modern interpretation of the Odyssey myth.
The story is told in the first person (the heterodiegetic narrator in an extra-diegetic
situation, according to G. Gennett [28]). Odysseus' wife, Penelope, describes in detail the
events and her experiences before, during, and after Odysseus' departure for the Trojan
War. Although the narrative is retrospective, the deceased Penelope consistently tells the
story of her life. The linear structure of the narrative reflects the gradual construal of the
narrator's experience and thus ensures the realization of the ideational language
metafunction [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Given that texts are ergodic (transitive) dynamic systems in which the positions of
linguistic units are not chaotic but subject to certain regularities, it stands to reason to use
statistical measures of correlation to describe them. We apply the Voyant Tools [29] to
create and process the corpus of “The Penelopiad” by M. Atwood as a preliminary stage of
the discourse analysis.</p>
      <p>The experimental study consists of several stages:
1. Establishing the frequency of use of verb lemmas in the work, identifying the most
frequent verbs, and pointing out the peculiarities of the author's choice/use of
atypically frequent words by comparing the findings with the ones obtained from
the general corpus of Canadian Fiction.
2. Categorizing the verbs based on the prototypical processes described above, and
identifying the respective six lexicosemantic groups of verbs according to the
Hallidayan process typology.
3. Using the Voyant Tools to segment the text of the novel into equal parts and
determine the distribution of verb word forms across the text segments.
4. Using unsupervised machine learning methods and techniques to establish
differences and similarities in data distribution and identify their correlation,
clustering, and trends.
5. Interpreting the results of the analysis, assessing strengths and weaknesses of the
implemented computer-aided approach to the literary text analysis.</p>
      <p>We take verb forms as a basic unit of the study since they have different values and
functions in text whereby manifesting the instability of a lemma in context.</p>
      <p>Obviously, individual verb forms/groups of verbs testifying to the realization of different
process types will be mutually related: they will occur close or far in the text, precede or
follow other verbs, forming clusters and collocations testifying to paradigmatic and
syntagmatic relations of different types. We apply density-based clustering, trying to
identify the verbs grouped in the areas of their high concentrations in the text. On the
successful completion of the computer-aided experiment, conclusions can be drawn
regarding the prevalence and variation of different types of processes and, as a result, the
realization of the ideational language metafunction in the narrative under study.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Experiment</title>
      <p>In accordance with the procedure described above, we follow all the stages of the
experimental study. The statistical text analysis relies on normalized frequencies of
occurrences.</p>
      <p>Table 1 shows the 25 most frequent verbs in M. Atwood's novel “The Penelopiad”
compared to the most frequent verbs in the section "Fiction" of the Strathy Corpus of the
Canadian variety of the English language identified previously [30].</p>
      <p>Rank</p>
      <p>In general, the frequency distribution of the top-ranked verbs corresponds to Zipf's Law,
and the verbs themselves coincide in rank with the verbs in the general frequency list
formed on the basis of the Strathy corpus of Fiction. Thus, the most frequent verb, apart
from the basic verbs be, have, do, is the lexical verb say. Down the list, the verbs exhibit a
more vivid variability and digression from the general use. The verbs that stand out in terms
of normalized frequency in the novel “The Penelopiad” are make, tell, know, want, keep, look,
try, use, eat, bring, let, hear, sleep, etc. These verbs can be considered the key verbs in the
novel. It is noticeable that the top 25 list of verbs in “The Penelopiad” does not contain any
modals in comparison with the general Strathy’s Fiction list. Modals do not contribute to
the ideational metafunction realization, they are associated with the other language
metafunction – interpersonal, and that is why they are not typical of the narrative and not
found on the top of this list.</p>
      <p>
        The identified verbs are subject to the classification in accordance with M. A. K. Halliday's
taxonomy of processes. As a result, six lexicosemantic groups of verbs (provided in
descending order according to their normalized frequencies) are identified, which denote:
1. Material processes: make, go, get, take, come, give, try, use, eat, bring, call, kill, weave,
throw, sail, play, rape, send, carry, hang, etc.
2. Mental processes: know, think, want, see, hear, suppose, believe, learn, consider, mean,
understand, need, remember, etc., which correspond to four types of perception:
perceptual (see, hear), cognitive (know, think), emotional (love) and desiderative
(want, need) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ].
3. Relational processes: be, have, marry, etc.
4. Existential processes: be (in the structures There is/are/was/were...), exist, etc.
5. Behavioral processes: look, sleep, die, laugh, weep, wait, listen, stand, enjoy, watch,
pretend, sit, etc.
6. Verbal processes: say, tell, speak, claim, order, etc.
      </p>
      <p>Some verbs are difficult to categorize (e.g., be) and can belong to different groups. We
focus on the prototypical verbs of the groups that have the highest frequency ranks in the
text. In addition, we take into account the frequency distribution of verb forms, which is
uneven, e.g., say and said (see Figure 1).</p>
      <p>The identified verbs (verb forms) denoting different process types in the narrative point
to the peculiarities of the author's choice determined by the genre, theme, and idiostyle (see
Figure 2).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Results</title>
      <p>With the help of the Voyant Corpus Tools, we have identified the linear distribution of all
the identified lexicosemantic verb groups corresponding to six process types across 10 text
segments. Figure 3 presents the visualization of the distribution of the mental processes in
the text of “The Penelopiad” by means of bubblelines. The visualization shows the verb
clustering and alternation as the narrative unfolds.</p>
      <p>One can assume mutual exclusiveness of mental and verbal verbs. If we compare the
distribution of the most frequent mental and verbal verb forms across the text segments,
we will see some correlation (Figure 5). The Pearson correlation coefficient was obtained
for said and know, amounting to -0.359, which indicates a moderate inverse proportional
relationship in the use of these verb forms.</p>
      <p>To discover transitivity patterns of the most frequent verbs, we have identified their
typical collocations with the subjects and objects in the text under study. Thus, the most
frequent collocations with the verbs are with the subjects: I know, he said (see Figure 6). On
the whole, the transitivity of the mental and verbal processes is rather low since no action
transference on the object occurs.</p>
      <p>One can observe the dominance of the verbal processes over the mental ones, which may
indicate a certain degree of exteriorization in the narrative, but comparing the frequency of
use of these verbs in the section "Fiction" established on the basis of the general corpus
(check Table 1), we do not find any significant deviations. The narrator does not directly
express her thoughts and feelings but rather tells a story.</p>
      <p>The distribution of the existential processes in the novel expressed in the structures
There is/are/was/were is shown in Figure 7. The findings correspond to the
abovementioned observations by M. A. K. Halliday: their frequency prevails at the beginning of
the novel.</p>
      <p>The distribution of the behavioral processes across the 10 text segments of “The
Penelopiad” by M. Atwood is presented in Figure 8.</p>
      <p>The distribution of the behavioral processes across the 10 text segments of “The
Penelopiad” by M. Atwood is presented in Figure 8.</p>
      <p>The distribution of the behavioral processes in the novel is mostly uniform, with a few
exceptions. For instance, in segments 6-8, we observe an increased frequency of the verb
sleep. In general, behavioral processes have a lower level of transitivity, describing the
background of the main action, conveying a reaction to the action, for example: When things
get too dismal, and after I've done as much weeping as possible without turning myself into a
pond, I have always - fortunately - been able to go to sleep. And when I sleep, I dream [27].</p>
      <p>The distribution of the relational processes is even in all the segments of the text, but
their identification is difficult due to the polysemy of the prototypical lexemes be and have,
which can denote other types of processes.</p>
      <p>The distribution of the material processes is also even, with the prevalence of some verbs
in certain segments, e.g., take at the end of the novel. Although the frequency of individual
verbs denoting material processes is relatively low, their variability is higher, as the list of
these verbs is wider. An important feature of these verbs is their higher degree of
transitivity, manifested by the variety of objects in the role of the Goal.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. Discussion</title>
      <p>The applied computer-aided methodology to identify the realization of the ideational
metafunction reflecting the construal of the narrator’s experience is only a preliminary
stage of the qualitative discourse analysis.</p>
      <p>The top-frequency verbs representing different process types identified in accordance
with the classification by M. A. K. Halliday and subject to the correlation analysis mostly
comply with the expectations:
1. The existential verbs prevail at the beginning of the text.
2. The material verbs are the most diverse and distributed evenly throughout the text,
featuring the highest degree of transitivity.
3. The verbal and mental verbs show a tendency towards inverse correlation.
4. The behavioral verbs are used as a means of backgrounding.
5. The relational verbs need either further manual research or more sophisticated
techniques for their automated sense disambiguation.</p>
      <p>The proposed methodology of the computer-aided narrative analysis appears to have
the following advantages:
1. It provides an objective, statistically verified text analysis.
2. Data clustering reveals latent patterning of linguistic features in the text, which
requires further attention on the part of discourse analysts.
3. The study of collocations of the verbs with their arguments is indispensable for the
identification of the transitivity patterns and the roles of the arguments (actants) in
the structure of the narrative, as well as in structuring the contextual meaning of
verbs.
4. Due to the affinity of the structure of the narrative and the structure of the process
from the standpoint adopted in this paper, the methodology applied here and the
findings can be of use both for the study of English grammar and text, shedding light
on the underlying mental representations.
5. The conducted analysis reveals the advantages of the Voyant Tools in conducting the
analysis of the language data distribution across the text, making use of a variety of
visualization tools.
6. The understanding of the alternation and mutual correlation of the processes in the
literary text can feed future text generation applications.</p>
      <p>Nonetheless, the proposed method is not devoid of the shortcomings and caveats that
need to be addressed in the future. Here, we only specify some of them:
1. The identified distribution of the verbs and alternating process types does not fully
reflect the aspectual semantics of the verbs. Some processes have a longer duration
and can overlap with others, and some verbs denote repeated actions, so their
representation as separate points on a graph or visualization by bubbles is not
entirely correct, for example:
(1) She kept saying that I was certainly very young [27].
(2) I did a lot of secluded weeping in those early days [27].
(3) I had not been attempting to catch men like flies: on the contrary, I'd merely been
trying to avoid entanglement myself [27].
2. The study of the linear distribution of the text data does not take into consideration
Heaps’ Law, according to which the rate of the count of distinct words available in
text gradually slows down, and the size of the vocabulary increases exponentially.
The implications of this principle are that since the majority of the words are
encountered at the beginning of the text, the words added at the end of the text have
a higher functional value, even though their frequencies can be lower. For instance,
in the novel under study, the verb blame appears in the final segments, conveying
the message of the narrator – blaming violence and restoring justice.</p>
      <p>Though the model easily identifies verb forms and their functioning, it still fails to
handle the issue of verb polysemy and word sense disambiguation. Polysemous
verbs can belong to different lexicosemantic groups and represent different
contextsensitive process types, which needs further research and more robust techniques
of automated lexical analysis.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>7. Conclusions</title>
      <p>The realization of the ideational metafunction, i.e., the construal of the narrator's
experience, in the novel “The Penelopiad” by M. Atwood is manifested by the functional
grammatical category of transitivity, which is realized through the transfer of an action to
the object and the identification of different process types. The temporal structure of the
narrative as a series of consecutive linear events is mainly conveyed by material processes
profiled by the corresponding verbs. The descriptive structure denoting the context in
which the events in the story take place is normally expressed by means of other process
types characterized by lower transitivity: existential, relational, and behavioral.</p>
      <p>The conducted statistical analysis and the application of the Voyant Tools proved to be
effective in studying the linear assembly of different types of processes in the narrative. In
general, we can observe the tendency that all types of processes are represented in all the
segments of the text more or less evenly, but with different frequencies of individual verbs
(verb forms).</p>
      <p>The analysis of the data correlation revealed their interdependencies and intricate
semantic and structural relations within the text, oftentimes subliminal.</p>
      <p>The clustering of the data appears to show the prominence of certain units performing
the function of foregrounding.</p>
      <p>The prospects for further research lie in a deeper analysis of transitivity as a functional
grammatical category relevant to discourse studies and narratology, and in a more
finegrained identification of different types of processes and their interaction within the
narrative. The elaborated computer-aided methodology of narrative/text analysis can be
applied to other literary and non-literary works and yield promising results in terms of
comparative text analysis.</p>
      <p>In terms of computer-aided narrative/text analysis, we can pinpoint the need for
applying more sophisticated machine learning methods and techniques, such as neural
networks and transformer-based models, for word sense disambiguation.
[17] A. Mahya, S. Ahangari, A study of ideational metafunction in Joseph Conrad’s “Heart of
Darkness”: a critical discourse analysis, English Language Teaching, 9/4 (2016) 203–
213. doi: 10.5539/elt.v9n4p203.
[18] S. Opara, Transitivity systems in selected narrative discourse, International Journal of</p>
      <p>Arts and Commerce, 1/7 (2012) 109–121.
[19] M. A. K. Halliday, Linguistic function and literary style: an inquiry into the language of
William Golding's “The Inheritors”, in: R. Carter, P. Stockwell (Eds.), The Language and
Literature Reader, Routledge, London, 2008, pp. 19–28. doi: 10.4324/9781003060789
[20] M. Mushtaq, T. Saleem, S. Afzal, A. Saleem, K.-W. Tong, A corpus-based ideational
metafunctional analysis of Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan’s speech at United Nations
General Assembly, Cogent Social Sciences, 7/1 (2021) 1–17.
doi:10.1080/23311886.2020.1856999.
[21] F. Ghani, T. Saleem, S. Majeed, R. Batool, M. Aslam, A corpus-based comparative
ideational meta-functional analysis of Pakistani English and UK English newspaper
editorials on COVID-19, Cogent Arts &amp; Humanities, 9/1 (2022).
doi:10.1080/23311983.2022.2114619.
[22] I. A. Bhatti, M. Azher, S. Abbas, Syntactic deconstruction of Beckett’s dramatic text: a
transitivity analysis of “Waiting for Godot”, International Journal of English Linguistics,
9/4 (2019) 93–106. doi: 10.5539/ijel.v9n4p93.
[23] U. Ammara, R. Y. Anjum, The transitivity analysis of Woolf’s “Kew Gardens”: a
corpusbased study, Corporum: Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2/2 (2019) 16–37.
[24] U. Ammara, R. Y. Anjum, M. Javed, A corpus-based Halliday’s transitivity analysis of “To
the Lighthouse”, Linguistics and Literature Review, 5/2 (2019) 139–162.
doi:10.32350/llr.52.05
[25] O. Melnychuk, I. Bekhta, M. Tkachivska, Pearson correlation coefficient in studying the
meaning of a literary text, in: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems, volume II: Computational
Linguistics Workshop, April 20–21, 2023, Kharkiv, Ukraine, pp. 460–477.
[26] I. Bekhta, Computer processing of verba sentiendi in Doris Lessing’s fiction (using R),
in: Proceedings of the IEEE 18th International Conference on Computer Science and
Information Technologies (CSIT), Lviv, Ukraine, 2023, pp. 1–4.
doi:10.1109/CSIT61576.2023.10324104.
[27] M. Atwood, The Penelopiad, Canongate Books Ltd, Edinburgh, UK, 2005.
[28] G. Genette, Figures of Literary Discourse, Columbia University Press, New York, NY,
1982.
[29] Voyant Tools. URL: https://voyant-tools.org/
[30] The Strathy Corpus of Canadian English. URL:
https://www.englishcorpora.org/strathy/</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. A. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Halliday</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Matthiessen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th ed.,
          <source>Routledge</source>
          , London,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. A. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Halliday</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Computational Linguistics and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Quantitative</given-names>
            <surname>Studies</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Continuum, London and New York,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>M. O'Donnell</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. Bateman,</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>SFL in computational contexts: A contemporary history</article-title>
          , in: R.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hasan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. M. I. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Matthiessen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Webster</surname>
          </string-name>
          (Eds.),
          <source>Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective</source>
          , volume
          <volume>1</volume>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Equinox</surname>
          </string-name>
          , London,
          <year>2005</year>
          . pp.
          <fpage>343</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>382</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Matthiessen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Ma</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I. N.</given-names>
            <surname>Mwinlaaru</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Computational Linguistics,
          <source>in: Systemic Functional Insights on Language and Linguistics</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>The M. A. K. Halliday Library</surname>
          </string-name>
          Functional Linguistics Series, Springer, Singapore,
          <year>2022</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>125</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>145</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/
          <fpage>978</fpage>
          -981-16-8713-
          <issue>6</issue>
          _
          <fpage>5</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Bateman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>O'Donnell, Computational linguistics: the Halliday connection</article-title>
          , in: J. J.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Webster</surname>
          </string-name>
          (Ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to M.
          <string-name>
            <surname>A. K. Halliday</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Bloomsbury, London and New York,
          <year>2015</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>453</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>467</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Bateman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>McDonald</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Hiippala</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Couto-Vale</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. Costetchi,
          <article-title>Systemic Functional Linguistics and computation: new directions, new challenges</article-title>
          , in: G. Thompson,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W. L.</given-names>
            <surname>Bowcher</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Fontaine</surname>
          </string-name>
          , D. Schönthal (Eds.),
          <source>The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics</source>
          , Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
          <year>2019</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>561</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>586</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Webster</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Text processing using the Functional Grammar Processor (FGP)</article-title>
          , in: M.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ghadessy</surname>
          </string-name>
          (Ed.),
          <source>Register Analysis: Theory and Practice</source>
          , Pinter, London and New York,
          <year>1993</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>181</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>195</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. A. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Halliday</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Matthiessen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Construing Experience through Meaning: A LanguageBased Approach to Cognition</article-title>
          . Open Linguistics Series, Continuum, London,
          <year>1999</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ch</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Fillmore,
          <article-title>Frame semantics and the nature of language</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech</source>
          , volume
          <volume>280</volume>
          ,
          <year>1976</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>20</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>32</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Greimas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Structural</given-names>
            <surname>Semantics</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <source>An Attempt at a Method</source>
          , University of Nebraska Press,
          <year>1983</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Bremond</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Logiqlle dll recit,
          <source>Editions du Seui</source>
          , Paris,
          <year>1973</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Langacker</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Concept, Image, and
          <article-title>Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar</article-title>
          , Walter de Gruyter,
          <year>2002</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Schmid</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Naration, Walter de Gruyter,
          <year>2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Polanyi-Bowditch</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Why the whats are when: mutually contextualizing realms of narrative</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society</source>
          ,
          <year>1976</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>59</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>77</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Bal</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Narratology: Introduction to the
          <source>Theory of Narrative</source>
          , 2nd ed., University of Toronto Press Incorporated, Toronto,
          <year>1999</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Hopper</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Thompson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Transitivity in grammar and discourse</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Language. 56/2</source>
          (
          <year>1980</year>
          )
          <fpage>251</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>299</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .2307/413757. JSTOR 413757.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>