<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Stewardship of open government data - concepts and corresponding roles in practice</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Isabell von Falkenhausen</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Jana Plomin</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Merle Heider</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Jens Klessmann</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communications Systems FOKUS</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 31, 10589 Berlin</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p>As the governance of open government data evolves the concept of data stewardship (DS) for open government data (OGD) is gaining traction both in grey and academic literature. At the same time, roles have emerged that may be described as open data stewards through combining tasks of internal data management, the facilitation of open data publication and external engagement and thus catering to several stakeholders. This paper aims to shed light on the concept of DS in OGD through the public domain and on the existence of formalized roles that enact such DS. We provide insights on DS by bringing together findings from literature on the OGD sector, the research data community and the private sector. Furthermore we conduct a content analysis on role descriptions from open data providing government organisations' websites in English and German speaking countries. Our results indicate that organisations in OGD employ roles that ensure DS on several levels and that stretch beyond typical roles found in research, using diferent role titles. While the priorities of roles predominantly entail responsibilities within the organization also external-facing tasks arise, indicating a stewardship for multiple stakeholders.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;data stewardship</kwd>
        <kwd>data governance</kwd>
        <kwd>open data</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The data steward role is mentioned in literature but often not defined [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. In practice certain
roles have emerged that uniquely unify internal data management with the facilitation of open
data publication and external engagement and which might be labeled as stewards for open
data. The Open Data Coordinator as described by the Competence Center for Open Data in
Germany serves as an examples for this [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. ”Stewardship” means taking on a task, overseeing
something or taking care of something [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. Data stewardship (DS) therefore involves overseeing
and caring for data, with its definition varying depending on the context and specific goals.
Stewardship in public administration requires that government information is managed as a
valuable resource, that its protection from damage and misuse is ensured and that transparency
is promoted by making it “fit for use” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. Data is seen as a strategic asset [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] with benefits
for the public [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6 ref7">6, 7</xref>
        ] and a focus on high data quality, security and standardized metadata [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]
in compliance with laws and regulations [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. Other sources demand a more comprehensive
understanding of DS that considers all stakeholders’ interests [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. The aim of this ongoing
research is to gain a first understanding of roles of DS in the government sector with a focus on
open data. For this we employ a content analysis on role descriptions from open data providing
government organisations’ websites through which we generate clusters of responsibilities
present among the roles descriptions.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. First results</title>
      <p>A web search revealed seven role descriptions from Germany, the USA, Canada and Austria
with the titles Open Data Coordinator, Open Data Commissioner, Data Steward, Data Expert
and Open Data Champion. Clusters of responsibilities derived through the content analysis
include amongst others identification and evaluation of datasets, data publication, ensuring data
quality, coordination within the organisation, compliance and exchange with user communities.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Conclusions</title>
      <p>A limitation of this study is that it does not consider the diferent contexts of the roles.
Recommendations for further research include conducting more in-depth qualitative studies on roles
enacting stewardship for OGD.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Johnson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Disintermediating Government:
          <article-title>The role of Open Data and Smart Infrastructure (</article-title>
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bundesverwaltungsamt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Leitfaden</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Open-Data-Koordination</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Curdt</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Dierkes</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Helbig</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Lindstädt</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Ludwig</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Neumann</surname>
          </string-name>
          , U. Parmaksiz, Data Stewardship im Forschungsdatenmanagement - Rollen, Aufgabenprofile, Einsatzgebiete (
          <year>2021</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
            <surname>Dawes</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Government Information Quarterly</source>
          <volume>27</volume>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          )
          <fpage>377</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>383</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C. T.</given-names>
            <surname>Force</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Data Stewardship and the Role of National Statistical Ofices in the New Data Ecosystem</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2023</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Ada</given-names>
            <surname>Lovelace</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Institute</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Participatory data stewardship,
          <year>2021</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>The</given-names>
            <surname>Govlab</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Wanted: Data Stewards - (Re-)Defining the roles and responsibilities of data stewards for an age of data collaboration</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>W. van Donge</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Bharosa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. F. W. H. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Janssen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Data-driven government: Cross-case comparison of data stewardship in data ecosystems</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Government Information Quarterly</source>
          <volume>39</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>101642</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Wendelborn</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Anger</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Schickhardt</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>What is data stewardship? Towards a comprehensive understanding</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Biomedical Informatics</source>
          <volume>140</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <fpage>104337</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>