The integration of social networks into modern life has revolutionized global communication, allowing instantaneous interaction. However, this convenience has also been misused, leading to the proliferation of inappropriate and often sexist remarks on social media. To address this, the field of natural language processing has been developing techniques to identify and mitigate such content. Our research, conducted as part of the CLEF EXIST 2024 competition, introduces a novel approach. We combined features from the 'twitter-roberta-base-sentiment-latest' transformer model with traditional lexical elements and profiling. The profiling involved grouping profiles by gender, age, and education level. Then, we categorized them based on their positive response rate to sexism and trained classifiers accordingly. This method was evaluated using the testing profiles, achieving an F1 score of 0.745. In the evaluation phase, our approach yielded an F1 score of 0.63. The efective combination of linguistic, transformer-based features and profiling was crucial to achieving these results.
In the modern era, social media has become an integral part of daily life, captivating nearly 80% of
individuals through its ubiquitous digital platforms [
Addressing this issue, our research is part of the CLEF EXIST 2024 competition [
Our method includes rigorous pre-processing, the integration of lexical and transformer-based feature extraction, and the application of profiling techniques. This comprehensive strategy is evaluated using the testing profiles, achieving an F1 score of 0.745. During the evaluation phase, our approach yielded an F1 score of 0.63. The integration of these diverse features and profiling techniques demonstrates the potential to significantly improve the detection of online sexism.
The following sections will detail our methodology, including the pre-processing steps, feature extraction techniques, regularization methods, and the evaluation metrics used to assess our system’s performance. Through this research, we aim to contribute to the broader eforts of combating online sexism, providing insights and tools that can be used to create a safer and more equitable digital environment.
Online sexism poses a significant problem, impacting women profoundly and creating a sense of insecurity both online and ofline [ 10, 11, 12]. Addressing this issue necessitates the development of robust strategies to foster safer online environments while maintaining freedom of speech. In response to this need, several competitions and initiatives have emerged, focusing on the detection and mitigation of hate speech and sexism on social media platforms.
Competitions such as EVALITA and IberEval have been pivotal in this efort, leveraging diverse datasets from various social media platforms, including Twitter, Reddit, and Gab [13]. These datasets are crucial for developing and evaluating models aimed at detecting online hate speech and sexism. For instance, datasets developed by Wasem and Hovy contain annotations for both sexist and racist content and have served as foundational resources for numerous studies.
Research eforts utilizing these datasets have explored various methodologies. For example, [ 14] employed word vectors and contextual analysis to detect sexism and racism, using five Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks as classifiers, achieving a precision of 0.9334. Similarly, [ 15] combined LSTM networks with random embeddings to extract features for Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDT), achieving a precision of 0.930.
The Student Research Workshop (SRW) dataset, highlighted in [16], focuses specifically on sexist hate speech. In this study, a combination of bag-of-words and sequential word features was used with a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier [17], resulting in an accuracy of 0.8932. Other studies have experimented with techniques such as sentence embeddings, term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) [18], and bag-of-words (BoW) methods, though these approaches generally achieved lower accuracy, with a maximum of 0.704 [19].
The continuous development and release of these datasets through various competitions have facilitated significant advancements in the field. Recently, the integration of transformer models from libraries like Transformers has shown considerable promise in enhancing the detection of online sexism. These sophisticated models represent a critical advancement in improving the accuracy and eficiency of detection systems [20, 21].
For the CLEF EXIST 2024 competition, we utilized the dataset provided by the organizers, focusing specifically on the identification of sexism in tweets for Task 1. This dataset builds on the EXIST 2023 dataset, incorporating both English and Spanish tweets. The dataset includes a curated lexicon of 250 terms indicative of sexist content. These terms were used to gather a comprehensive collection of over 10,000 annotated tweets, with a balanced representation of English and Spanish content. To achieve a balanced dataset, excessively imbalanced terms were discarded, resulting in approximately 5,000 tweets labeled as sexist and 5,000 tweets labeled as non-sexist, ensuring an even distribution for training and testing. Six annotators from the Prolific app, guided by experts in gender issues, labeled each tweet, considering gender and age to mitigate label bias. Additional demographic details such as education level, ethnicity, and country of residence were also included for the 2023 and 2024 datasets. A learning with disagreements approach was employed, providing all annotations per instance rather than aggregated labels, to capture a diversity of perspectives.
In this study, we developed a comprehensive system to detect sexism in online text, specifically tweets. Our architecture integrates multiple stages of data processing, feature extraction, and regularization to enhance the detection accuracy. The following subsections provide a detailed overview of each component within our system.
In the preprocessing stage, we aimed to standardize and clean the textual data to ensure consistency and clarity. Using the Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) library [22], we performed a series of transformations on the text data. Hashtags were replaced with the term "hashtag," and user mentions were substituted with "mention." URLs within the text were replaced by the placeholder "URL," and emojis were converted to their corresponding UTF-8 encoded descriptions, labeled as "emoji." Following these substitutions, we further refined the text by removing punctuation, converting all characters to lowercase, and eliminating common stopwords to reduce noise and enhance the quality of the data for subsequent analysis.
In the provided dataset each message was annotated by six diferent individuals. Due to the even number of annotators, we sometimes faced situations where three annotators labeled a message as sexist and the other three labeled it as non-sexist, resulting in a tie. To address this, we implemented a profiling approach based on demographic factors: gender, education level, and age.
We grouped the annotators’ responses according to these demographic profiles. For each message, we calculated the total number of responses per profile and the number of times a message was labeled as sexist. This allowed us to categorize the profiles into four groups based on their likelihood of labeling messages as sexist or non-sexist.
We analyzed these profiles to predict the probability of a message being labeled as sexist based on the annotators’ demographic tendencies. This profiling approach helped us resolve ties and make more informed decisions regarding the classification of messages.
Following the profiling, we performed feature extraction and trained four distinct systems based on the grouped profiles and their responses. These systems were then evaluated to determine their efectiveness in accurately detecting sexist messages.
To begin our analysis, we focused on extracting traditional lexical features to gain insights into the linguistic patterns present in the data. This process involved identifying various lexical elements as described by Puertas et al. [23]. We categorized these features into 27 distinct groups, including word usage, hashtags, URLs, emojis, frequently used Part-of-Speech (POS) tags, adverbs, and adjectives. This comprehensive extraction allowed us to conduct a thorough examination of the corpus, providing a solid foundation for understanding the data’s linguistic characteristics.
To enhance our approach, we integrated modern techniques by incorporating the Twitter-roBERTabase model specifically fine-tuned for sentiment analysis[ 24, 21]. This variant of RoBERTa-base was trained on a large collection of tweets from January 2018 to December 2021 and evaluated using the TweetEval benchmark. By leveraging this model, we were able to extract sentiment-based features alongside traditional lexical features. The combination of these two feature sets—lexical and transformer-based—was achieved through concatenation, resulting in a robust and comprehensive feature representation.
To further enhance our feature extraction process, we incorporated the Twitter-roBERTa-base model, specifically fine-tuned for sentiment analysis. This transformer model, a variant of RoBERTa-base, was trained on a large dataset of tweets collected from January 2018 to December 2021 and evaluated using the TweetEval benchmark. The primary advantage of using this model lies in its ability to capture nuanced sentiment features from the text, which are crucial for identifying subtle expressions of sexism.
The integration process involved several key steps. First, we preprocessed the text data as described in the Pre-Processing section, ensuring consistency and clarity. Next, we passed the cleaned text through the Twitter-roBERTa-base model to extract sentiment-based features. These features encapsulate the emotional tone and contextual sentiment of each tweet, providing a deeper understanding of the underlying sentiment patterns.
By combining these sentiment features with the traditional lexical features extracted earlier, we created a comprehensive feature set. This combined feature set was achieved through a concatenation process, where both sets of features were merged to form a unified representation. This approach allowed us to leverage the strengths of both traditional lexical analysis and modern transformer-based sentiment analysis.
The resulting feature representation was then used as input for our classification models. This hybrid approach not only improved the accuracy of sexism detection but also provided a richer and more nuanced understanding of the text data.
Regularization was an essential step in our methodology to ensure that our model performed well and was not prone to overfitting. First, we divided the dataset into training and validation sets to facilitate model training and evaluation. To address the issue of class imbalance, we employed techniques to generate synthetic instances, ensuring that both classes were adequately represented in the training data. Specifically, we used the K-Fold Stratified Shufle-Split technique, as described by Sandoval et al. [25], to create multiple splits of the data. This approach allowed us to maintain the original distribution of classes within each fold, enhancing the robustness and generalizability of our model through efective cross-validation.
The performance of our system was evaluated using two approaches: one without profiling and one with profiling. We assessed the system’s efectiveness based on four key metrics: F1 score, precision, recall, and accuracy. The results for each approach during the training phase are presented in Table 1.
The results from the approach without profiling demonstrate a solid performance across all metrics. The higher precision and recall indicate that the system is capable of efectively identifying sexist messages, while maintaining a reasonable balance between false positives and false negatives.
The results from the approach with profiling show a balanced performance, with precision slightly higher than recall. This suggests that the profiling method contributed to a consistent detection of sexist messages while maintaining a moderate false positive rate.
Overall, the training phase evaluation results from both approaches indicate that our system is capable of reliably detecting sexism in online text. While the metrics are satisfactory, they highlight areas for further improvement and refinement.
The final evaluation of our system was conducted during the CLEF EXIST 2024 competition, where the performance was assessed using the competition’s oficial metrics. The results for both approaches are as follows:
The approach without profiling achieved a position of 54 in the competition, with an ICM-Hard score of 0.1064, an ICM-Hard Norm score of 0.5532, and an F1_YES score of 0.6320. This indicates a relatively strong performance in detecting sexist messages.
The approach with profiling, on the other hand, achieved a position of 56, with an ICM-Hard score of 0.0390, an ICM-Hard Norm score of 0.5195, and an F1_YES score of 0.6221. While this approach showed slightly lower performance metrics, it still demonstrated the system’s capability in the competition context.
Overall, the competition evaluation results suggest that both approaches have their strengths, with the non-profiling approach slightly outperforming the profiling approach. These results provide valuable insights for further refinement and optimization of our detection system.
This study presented a novel approach to detecting online sexism in tweets by combining transformer models and profiling techniques. By integrating features from the ’twitter-roberta-base-sentimentlatest’ model with traditional lexical elements, and grouping annotator profiles based on demographic factors such as gender, age, and education level, we aimed to improve the accuracy of sexism detection. Our methodology included rigorous pre-processing, comprehensive feature extraction, and robust regularization techniques to ensure the reliability of our model.
The evaluation results demonstrated that both approaches, with and without profiling, performed satisfactorily in the training phase, achieving F1 scores of 74.5 and 75.68, respectively. The competition results showed that the approach without profiling slightly outperformed the profiling approach, with higher scores in all metrics. While the metrics indicate a solid performance, there is still room for improvement, especially in refining the profiling techniques to better capture demographic biases.
Future work will focus on several areas to enhance the detection of online sexism. First, we plan to refine our profiling techniques by incorporating more detailed demographic data and exploring additional factors that may influence annotator biases. Second, we aim to experiment with other transformer models and fine-tune them specifically for sexism detection to improve the performance further.
Additionally, expanding the dataset to include a wider variety of social media platforms and languages could provide a more comprehensive understanding of online sexism. We also intend to investigate the use of advanced regularization techniques and ensemble methods to increase the robustness of our models.
Finally, collaborating with experts in gender studies and psychology could provide valuable insights into the nuances of sexist language, leading to more accurate and sensitive detection systems. By addressing these areas, we hope to contribute to the development of more efective tools for combating online sexism and promoting safer online environments.
The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by the master’s degree scholarship program in engineering at the Universidad Tecnologica de Bolivar (UTB) in Cartagena, Colombia.