=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-3768/preface
|storemode=property
|title=None
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3768/preface.pdf
|volume=Vol-3768
}}
==None==
<pdf width="1500px">https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3768/preface.pdf</pdf>
<pre>
                                Preface
                                Timotheus Kampik1 , Kristijonas Čyras2 , Antonio Rago3 and Oana Cocarascu4
                                1
                                  Umeå University, Sweden & SAP Signavio, Germany
                                2
                                  Ericsson Inc., USA
                                3
                                  Imperial, UK
                                4
                                  King’s College London, UK



                                   Research on intelligent systems that can explain their inferences and decisions to (human
                                and machine) users has emerged as an important subfield of Artificial Intelligence (AI). In this
                                context, the interest in symbolic and hybrid approaches to AI and their ability to facilitate ex-
                                plainable and trustworthy reasoning and decision-making – often in combination with machine
                                learning algorithms – is increasing. Computational argumentation is considered a particularly
                                promising paradigm for facilitating explainable AI (XAI). This trend is reflected by the fact that
                                many researchers who study argumentation have started to i) apply argumentation as a method
                                of explainable reasoning; ii) combine argumentation with other subfields of AI, such as knowl-
                                edge representation and reasoning (KR) and machine learning (ML), to facilitate the latter’s
                                explainability; iii) study explainability properties of argumentation; iv) move from explainable
                                AI to contestable AI, by facilitating not only explainability but also human intervention. Given
                                the substantial interest in these different facets of argumentative XAI, this workshop aims at
                                providing a forum for focused discussions of the recent developments on the topic.
                                   These workshop proceedings feature five papers (out of eight submitted), covering diverse
                                perspectives on argumentative explainability. The works’ topics range from formal argumen-
                                tation dialogues, via applications of argumentative explainability to e.g. image classification,
                                to human factors. We thank all the authors of the submitted papers, our keynote speaker
                                AnneMarie Borg, as well as the reviewers of the submitted papers (listed below) for making the
                                2𝑛𝑑 edition of the workshop a success.




                                ArgXAI-24: 2nd International Workshop on Argumentation for eXplainable AI
                                $ tkampik@cs.umu.se (T. Kampik); kristijonas.cyras@ericsson.com (K. Čyras); a.rago@imperial.ac.uk (A. Rago);
                                oana.cocarascu@kcl.ac.uk (O. Cocarascu)
                                                                       © 2024 Copyright for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
                                    CEUR
                                    Workshop
                                    Proceedings
                                                  http://ceur-ws.org
                                                  ISSN 1613-0073
                                                                       CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org)



                                                                                                                                           1




CEUR
                  ceur-ws.org
Workshop      ISSN 1613-0073
Proceedings
Timotheus Kampik et al. CEUR Workshop Proceedings   1–2


Program Committee
    • Gianvincenzo Alfano
    • Lars Bengel
    • Elfia Bezou Vrakatseli
    • Lydia Blümel
    • Davide Ceolin
    • Jesse Heyninck
    • Loan Ho
    • Jieting Luo
    • Mariela Morveli Espinoza
    • Alison R. Panisson
    • Theodore Patkos
    • Guilherme Paulino-Passos
    • Nico Potyka
    • Nikolaos Spanoudakis
    • Srdjan Vesic
    • Madeleine Waller
    • Andreas Xydis
    • Xiang Yin
    • Yun Zhou
    • Timotheus Kampik
    • Kristijonas Čyras
    • Antonio Rago
    • Oana Cocarascu




                                              2

</pre>