<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>DigiTransfEd</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Professional development of teachers in conditions of digital transformation of postgraduate pedagogical education</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Iryna P. Vorotnykova</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>18/2 Bulvarno-Kudriavska Str., Kyiv, 04053</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>3</volume>
      <fpage>23</fpage>
      <lpage>27</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The digital transformation of society promotes changes in all spheres of life, including education. Digital and remote technologies for professional development are essential for those who combine study with work and already have professional experience. The critical aspects of the continuity of the educational process during crises and the creation of strategies for the efective implementation of digital tools in postgraduate pedagogical education are understanding the general strategy of the digital transformation of education in general and postgraduate pedagogical education in particular. To ensure the continuous professional development of teachers in today's conditions, it is necessary to consider the possibilities of digital transformation of postgraduate pedagogical education. The digital transformation strategy of postgraduate education is impossible without analysing the needs and requests of teachers in professional development using digital technologies and possibilities of postgraduate education, taking into account international experience. To determine teachers' professional development possibilities, the article presented the results of a survey of 1472 teachers of various specialities and diferent professional experiences and conducted interviews with focus groups of 72 teachers with a high level of digital competence and professional experience.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;digital transformation</kwd>
        <kwd>postgraduate pedagogical education</kwd>
        <kwd>teacher's professional development</kwd>
        <kwd>information and educational environment</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The modern world, particularly in the use of AI, is changing rapidly, and to be competitive, education
systems must adapt to these changes. Digital transformation is necessary for updating education,
which should ensure lifelong learning and teachers’ adaptation to the changing conditions of the labour
market according to the requirements of time and the conditions of the modern economy. Digital
transformation should reduce or remove barriers to access to quality, flexible postgraduate education
and ensure continuous professional development of teachers because of the ability to choose various
training programs and use adaptive learning platforms from anywhere in the world at a convenient
time and at your own pace. Researchers emphasise the development of Education 4.0 and Education
5.0. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] conducted a systematic review of the concept of “Education 4.0” as a new educational system
based on experience, which uses technology and meets the expectations of the modern world within
the framework of personalised educational needs and concluded that compared to previous social
constructs, we are talking about a digital society that is being formed, defined by a completely new
perception of time and place and virtually unlimited access to information [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. Education 5.0 refers to
the fifth industrial revolution in education through the use of digital technologies to remove barriers
to learning, improve learning methods and promote overall well-being. The critical requirements of
Education 5.0 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] are advanced technologies that make it possible and necessary to create a
learnercentred environment that uses the latest technologies and learning methods, in particular, artificial
intelligence, blockchain, virtual and augmented reality, which can enhance personalisation, engagement
and to provide more comprehensive access to education, taking into account ethical aspects cite.
      </p>
      <p>The digital transformation of postgraduate education is a complex and multifaceted process that
requires a comprehensive approach and consideration of many factors. Essential aspects are
preparing teachers to use the latest technologies, supporting continuous learning in crisis conditions, and
developing strategies for efectively integrating digital tools into the educational process.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Literature review</title>
      <p>
        Mergel et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] conducted research based on interviews with experts, developing a detailed definition
of digital transformation, highlighting its importance for educational institutions and determining how
information systems can be integrated into educational institutions to support digital transformation.
      </p>
      <p>
        The study of leadership in the conditions of digital transformation, organisational flexibility and
digital transformation itself made it possible to determine that the training of educational leaders should
ensure successful changes and adaptation of new technologies in educational institutions [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. The
intersection between teachers and artificial intelligence in education is another opportunity to improve
the quality of teaching and reduce the burden on teachers. Still, it should become a mandatory condition
for such cooperation and ethical training for educators and technologists to ensure the responsible use
of AI in the educational process.
      </p>
      <p>The European Digital Strategy aims to give Europe a leadership position in digital technologies,
the development of the digital economy, the protection of citizens’ data, and the support of digital
infrastructure.</p>
      <p>
        The main factors can determine the adoption of new technologies in education: to what extent
users believe that the new technology will improve their work (Perceived Usefulness), to what extent
ease their use of new technology (Perceived Ease of Use), general attitude towards using technology
(Attitude Towards Using), intention to use technology in the future (Behavioural Intention to Use), social
influences, organisational support and individual characteristics of users (External Variables). Scientists
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]investigated developing teachers’ knowledge in integrating content, pedagogy and technology. They
created the TRACK model, which is critical to understanding how teachers can efectively use technology
in learning. Kaufmann [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ] compared the adoption of artificial intelligence models by experienced and
novice teachers and explored the factors influencing teachers’ willingness to use new technologies in
their work. In their bibliometric analysis, Phuong et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] considered digital tools for distance learning,
emphasising the importance of modern technologies to ensure the quality of learning in the distance
format. Training and support of teachers and providing access to modern technologies are essential for
quality teaching [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Ukraine has adopted several documents that regulate and regulate the processes of digital
transformation: Concept for Developing the Digital Economy and Society of Ukraine for 2018-2020, Strategy
for the Development of Digital Skills and Digital Rights of Citizens until 2025, Law of Ukraine on the
Basic Principles of Cybersecurity in Ukraine (2017), Concept for the Development of E-Governance in
Ukraine (2017), Law of Ukraine on Electronic Trust Services (2017), National Informatization Program
(2008, updated in 2020), Law of Ukraine on Open Data (2015, updated in 2020).</p>
      <p>
        Ukrainian researchers emphasise the importance of digital transformation of education in crisis
conditions and the importance of digital skills during crises [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ]. The experience of digital transformation
of secondary education in Ukraine during the war showed [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ] that in crisis conditions, it is very
important to adapt digital tools to support continuous learning. It has been proven that the quality
of teaching in natural and mathematical disciplines depends on teachers’ attitudes toward digital
transformation and the level of digital transformation in educational institutions. Morse et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]
reviewed the efectiveness of training managers in e-learning, emphasising the importance of designing
training programs and evaluating their efectiveness in supporting digital transformation.
      </p>
      <p>
        Researchers point to obstacles to the digital transformation of education: resistance to change, digital
skills gap, unstructured data and lack of an implementation strategy. It is crucial to have a plan for the
digital transformation of this or that educational link as a whole and each institution [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ] and consider
critical success factors for the efective implementation of the “Education 4.0” strategy and provide
recommendations on the integration of technologies into the educational process to ensure quality
education. Most of the research concerns the digital transformation of higher education [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref13">13, 1</xref>
        ], which
is essential in the context of the development of higher pedagogical education because this is where the
research activity of future teachers is formed in the conditions of digitalisation, teachers are trained
for professional activities, practical recommendations are provided for the successful integration of
technologies into the educational process [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ]. We must emphasise that higher education prepares a
competitive specialist for several years, and postgraduate pedagogical education should be anticipatory
and ensure the teacher’s professional development under the development of society and science
throughout his professional life (almost 30 years).
      </p>
      <p>Researchers have not paid attention to the digital transformation of postgraduate education and its
opportunities for teacher professional development, particularly the study of the digital transformation
strategy of postgraduate education.</p>
      <p>Research questions or hypothesis: digital transformation of postgraduate pedagogical education will
ensure an individual trajectory of professional development of teachers The purpose of the study: to
reveal the possibilities of professional development of teachers in the conditions of digital transformation
of postgraduate education</p>
      <p>Objectives of the study.</p>
      <p>• To analyse the needs and requests of teachers in professional development using digital
technologies and attitudes towards the digital transformation of postgraduate education;
• To build a strategy for the digital transformation of postgraduate pedagogical education for the
professional development of teachers. settings.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Methodology</title>
      <p>To collect data, a survey was conducted among 1472 teachers of various specialities and interviews with
72 teachers with much experience and a high level of digital competence. The survey was conducted
online with the anonymity of participants and content questions about the qualification levels of
teachers and their competencies, determined by views on efective methods in postgraduate education.
The data were analysed using statistical methods to assess the main trends and challenges and build
a strategy for the digital transformation of postgraduate education for the continuous professional
development of teachers. The focus group of teachers with experience using digital technologies and a
high level of digital competence was formed by speciality based on the analysis of their pedagogical
activities and the desire to contribute to the digital transformation of education. Participants of focus
groups (up to 9 participants in one group) expressed their forecasts regarding the digital transformation
of education and substantiated their opinions. The participants’ opinions were summarised, and critical
forecasts were highlighted, with which each focus group became familiar. Forecasts were built based on
previous ones until there were no changes in individual forecasts. The results of the survey of diferent
groups of teachers were processed using statistical methods.</p>
      <p>Description of research plan and methods This study used theoretical methods: literature analysis
for building hypotheses and developing the study’s theoretical basis, defining the problem to be solved,
and empirical methods, a qualitative approach using interviews and focus groups as data collection
methods and statistical methods for processing the results. The study was conducted based on a sample
of teachers.</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>3.1. Data collection process</title>
        <p>They took part in the survey 1472 teachers of various specialities: natural sciences (20.97%), mathematics
(12.3%), foreign language (6.3%), computer science (6.03%), technology (2.7%), Ukrainian language and
literature (4.79%), history (3%) of primary school teachers (6.7%) and 37.21% of teachers (physical
education, art, teacher organisers, etc.), which emphasises the consideration thoughts teachers of
various specialities regarding their professional development. The largest share of participants (56.1%)
has the highest qualification level, of which 19.4% are Methodology teachers and 21.4% are senior
teachers. Teachers of the first category are 11.2%, teachers of the second category are 11.2%, and
specialists are 7.1%. Teachers with diferent teaching experiences took part in the survey: more than
20 years – 47.50%, from 10 to 20 years – 28.64%, up to 10 years – 22.03%, up to 1 year – 1.83%, which
allowed to take into account diferent teachers’ experience.</p>
        <p>Data were collected through interviews, focus groups, and online teacher surveys. Each teacher was
interviewed individually, allowing for detailed information.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Results</title>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>4.1. The needs and requests of teachers in professional development with the use of digital technologies and attitudes towards the digital transformation of postgraduate education</title>
        <p>Digital technologies allow educators to quickly update educational materials with the latest advances
in science and technology, guaranteeing teachers the opportunity to obtain up-to-date knowledge that
meets the modern requirements of the labour market and the needs of society.</p>
        <p>Let us consider teachers’ requests regarding the digital transformation of postgraduate teacher’s
education, ensuring continuous professional development, based on a survey of 1,472 teachers in 2024.
Almost half of the participants have extensive teaching experience (over 20 years— 47.50%, from 10
to 20 years: 28.64%; up to 10 years—22.03%, up to 1 year—1.83%), which emphasises the importance
of further professional development for teachers with diferent levels of experience. To the question
“What motivated you to increase the level of professionalism in the chosen topic?” most of the answers
related to the relevance of the topic (58.31%), interest in learning new things (48.72%), the possibility
of choosing the desired distance form of professional development (37.92%), free courses (34.0%), the
availability of experience and this topic (33.10%), recommendations colleagues (18.43%), authority of
the teacher (6.31%).</p>
        <p>Face-to-face education is the most efective and desirable (average score of 4.43). Still, teachers also
chose the mixed form of education (average score of 4.41) and the distance form of education (average
score of 4.23), which indicates a generally positive assessment of all forms of education (figure 1).</p>
        <p>
          The answer is, “Is it necessary to use coaching, including electronic coaching, in professional
development?” 43.4% of teachers answered positively, 1.7% determined that yes, but 37.2% hesitated to
answer under certain conditions, and only 17.7% said that it was unnecessary. Instead, in 2017, the
percentage of positive responses regarding using e-coaching was 10% [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>It can be concluded that the digital transformation of society and education is increasing teachers’
desire to receive personalised postgraduate education with consulting and coaching. Surveys showed a
medium to high level of digital competence among teachers (67.45%), their desire to master new digital
tools for professional development, including AI technologies (74.23%) and motivation for continuous
professional development using digital technologies (89.35%).</p>
        <p>Most participants (almost 70%) give distance learning the highest rating (5), and 24.78% of participants
gave a rating of 4, indicating that many participants consider this form of learning very efective.
When evaluating the disadvantages and advantages of remote advanced training synchronously and
asynchronously with active and passive participation, the participants determined the efectiveness of
the synchronous training form in webinars (figure 2). Seventy-two teachers who have a high level of
digital competence (64.7% of participants have scores of 9 and 10 on a 10-point scale) and significant
work experience (88.24% – more than 20 years, from 10 to 20 years) participated in the focus group
survey – 5.88%) and a high level of qualification (teacher of the highest category – 47.06%, title of
“methodology teacher” – 29.41%, teacher of the highest category, title of “senior teacher” – 23.53%) and
motivated to digital transformation of education.</p>
        <p>Their survey results showed that the main functions of the information and educational environment
in postgraduate education are to provide access to current professional development programs in digital
format and to create professional online networks and communities to support and develop teachers.</p>
        <p>The respondents highlighted the following main perspectives on development information and the
educational environment of post-graduate teacher education: providing access to current professional
development programs (17.65%), monitoring teacher requests and creating adaptive professional
development programs (11.76%), developing professional online communities and networks (11.76%).
Simultaneously, the quality of content, interactivity of learning and availability of resources remain
critical factors in the efectiveness of using the information and educational environment (41.17%). To
further improve the informational and academic environment of postgraduate pedagogical education,
according to teachers, it is necessary to focus on improving their support (tutoring), which was indicated
by 29.35% of respondents, improving qualifications and supporting professional networks (11.76% of
responses), attracting experienced teachers as authors of professional development courses (17.65% of
reactions).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>4.2. Model of educational policy of digital transformation of postgraduate pedagogical education</title>
        <p>The results of the survey of the focus groups of teachers made it possible to identify the necessary
directions for the digital transformation of postgraduate pedagogical education: in the management of
postgraduate education and organisation of the educational process, teaching and learning, professional
development of postgraduate education teachers and teachers, resource provision.</p>
        <p>
          To develop the educational policy of digital transformation of post-graduate teacher education, the
results of teacher surveys, literature analysis, and tools and Intel, which consists of materials arranged
according to the educational policy development process model, were used [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>Components of such tools.</p>
        <p>• Forecasting the future. Formation of a common vision ;
• Develop a strategic plan to create a roadmap for realising the vision, focused on the next five
years. Select some strategic levers that can be used to implement change. Plan to use these levers
to join the eforts of interested participants to implement transformational changes;
• Management plan and resource provision;
• Evaluation and adjustment of phase 1 “Prediction of the future”;</p>
        <p>The first phase. Let us consider forecasting the future and forming a common vision. At the
state level, it is possible to single out trends regarding the vision of strategies related to the development
of postgraduate education to ensure the professional development of teachers: anti-corruption reform,
provision of services in electronic form to citizens, decentralisation and reform of public administration,
promotion of Ukraine’s interests in the global information space, digital transformation for economic
and social development within the framework of public-private partnership, reducing the gap in digital
technologies and increasing their availability, reforming the education sector, the need to eliminate
inequality between rural and urban communities in providing quality education. The strategy is based
on the vision of the future landmarks to which we strive: the economy is built on the use of our
resources and engagement with the latest technologies, work under martial law and post-war recovery,
education has a proactive nature, a high percentage of middle-class people (60%) a single information
space, e-government, e-services, e-democracy.</p>
        <p>Implementation of national vision strategies at the level of the Institute of Postgraduate
Pedagogical Education: digital transformation, individualisation of continuous professional development of
teachers, creation of an information and educational environment for professional development of
teachers, internship, personalised training, preservation of the mission, development of corporate
culture, traditions, improvement of communication between participants of the educational process,
using AI.</p>
        <p>Development of education: increasing the availability of quality, competitive education for citizens
of Ukraine by the requirements of innovative sustainable development of society, economy, and every
citizen; ensuring the personal development of a person according to his abilities and needs based on
lifelong learning. Critical areas of educational policy: modernisation of the structure, content and
organisation of the educational process based on the competence approach, personalised training,
reorientation of the content of education for sustainable development; creation and provision of
opportunities for the implementation of various educational models and methods for teachers working
in educational institutions of diferent types and forms of ownership, multiple forms and means of
obtaining an education; cooperation with educational institutions, training centres on the creation of a
joint informational and educational environment for the professional development of teachers; ensuring
availability and continuity of education throughout life; ensuring monitoring of the education system,
raising the social status of teachers; development of human resources (personnel) and the creation of a
knowledge society.</p>
        <p>Among the tasks of postgraduate pedagogical education which must be resolved, the main ones are the
formation of the content of training based on the target direction and job duties of specialists, professional
standards, previously acquired education, work experience, individual interests and needs; the use of
modern technologies, which provide for diferentiation, individualisation, the introduction of various
forms of professional development, including without leaving work; development and continuous
improvement of the content of postgraduate education, and at the state level – decentralisation of
management bodies and autonomous institutions, which will be able (forced) to make decisions and
bear responsibility for them to ensure continuous professional development of the teacher or lose him
as a customer of services in connection with the development of competition among institutions of
postgraduate pedagogical education and various organisations, training centres. A digital transformation
policy for teacher professional development is impossible without considering teachers’ motivation
and educational institutions’ needs, which school leaders determine, the possibilities of postgraduate
pedagogical education, and the availability of consulting and coaching assistance for educators.</p>
        <p>The second phase – “Strategic plan development” , includes directions organised to support
stepby-step implementation, namely: the creation of a long-term plan, search for levers of influence,
coordination of interested participants, and development of strategies. Combining the results of changes
in various system components is necessary for the digital transformation of postgraduate pedagogical
education. This should be done by institutes of post-graduate pedagogical education, which have
gained various experiences in ICT policy and professional development of teachers in conditions of
digitalisation, and all interested participants. Considering the above, we will develop a strategic plan
for the digital transformation of postgraduate education, which will encourage the implementation of
educational policy in the next five years.</p>
        <p>Strategic plan of digital transformation of postgraduate pedagogical education.</p>
        <p>
          Leadership management of postgraduate education and organisation of the educational process:
• distribution and expansion of the network of digital educational platforms for the professional
development of teachers using constantly updated content ;
• development of a national platform for management postgraduate pedagogical education with AI
integration to analyse data and predict training needs for optimisation processes and to increase
their eficiency;
• implementation of a system of individual online registration for courses and placement of
eportfolios of teachers on the platform for the creation of data banks and improving the exchange
of information between teachers and administration;
• the use of AI to analyse and monitor the efectiveness of courses and the individual progress of
teachers and determine their training needs, which helps in data-based decision-making, which
improves the management and planning of educational processes;
Professional development of postgraduate teachers and teachers
• soft skills and hard skills, development of critical thinking, analytical, technical communication
skills of teachers, project management skills [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
          ];
• development of digital competencies of teachers [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
          ];
• personalised professional development and learning: using AI to create individual professional
development trajectories based on learning data analysis, using AI-based adaptive learning
systems to improve motivation and learning outcomes [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
          ]; introducing virtual assistants to
support teachers in training and professional development. AI assistants can provide
round-theclock support and consulting, which positively afects the efectiveness of training;
• involvement of teachers in international projects and internship programs organised both in a
face-to-face format and using AI platforms to improve teaching quality and develop professional
skills [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>
          ];
Teaching and learning:
• Use of AI to monitor professional development needs and adapt training programs to respond to
changes on time and ensure the relevance of training programs;
• using various forms of professional development, mobile immersive technologies, micro-learning
and ensuring synchronisation of data between diferent devices such as phones, tablets and
computers for convenience and continuity of learning, allowing teachers to have constant access
to the necessary materials [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>
          ] regardless of their location using cloud-based services;
• introduction of electronic coaching and mentoring using AI to support and advise teachers to
increase the efectiveness of teaching and support of teachers [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11 ref15">15, 11</xref>
          ];
• individual and group programs: development of individual and group educational and professional
programs for various forms of education, including creating and supporting massive open online
courses (MOOC) using AI technologies for adaptive learning. Studies confirm that MOOCs with
the integration of AI contribute to improving access to quality education and increasing the level
of knowledge among teachers;
• creation of digital etiquette of cooperation and communication and use of cloud technologies to
share experiences and create joint online learning programs based on connectivist theory;
• with the creation of adaptive training programs and improvement of the assessment system using
AI and implementation of formative assessment and self-assessment; implementing adaptive
programs using AI to analyse teachers’ needs and progress. Studies confirm that adaptive learning
systems increase student motivation and success;
• for constant monitoring of the quality of education and the efectiveness of educational programs:
AI can ensure high quality of education and timely correction of programs, using AI for formative
assessment, self-assessment and expert assessment of professional development programs for
objectivity and transparency of assessment ;
• introduction of a teacher certification system with automatic monitoring and evaluation to
promote changes in the content of postgraduate pedagogical education;
• peer review: evaluation of professional development programs by teachers on platforms and sites
and improving the quality of education through research and evaluation using AI;
• for automatic assessment of achievement results, which contributes to the objectivity and
eficiency of knowledge assessment [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
          ];
• to research changes in the system of postgraduate pedagogical education and the introduction
of innovative technologies. Data analytics based on AI helps to make informed decisions and
implement innovations;
• ensuring data security and content quality (plagiarism check), safety and eficiency of management
of educational resources;
Resource support:
• development of digital infrastructure of educational institutions;
• availability of e-education managers;
• providing access to educational resources;
• development of repositories in educational institutions, libraries, open electronic educational
resources and electronic textbooks;
• use of cloud services, individual educational e-ofices, and e-methodical centres.
        </p>
        <p>The third phase is “Management Plan + Resource Support”. In the management plan, we must
define the areas of activity and responsibility for implementing the programs that introduce the
implementation of the educational policy on the digital transformation of postgraduate pedagogical education.
The budget should include the following categories of costs: initial costs, which include ensuring the
development of digital infrastructure (hardware and software), teacher training, maintenance (installation
of hardware, payment of IT specialists, etc.); costs for the provision of services, that will be provided
by third parties (outsourcing). To set up the digital infrastructure, educational institutions should also
decide what tools can be used free of charge and which need funding.</p>
        <p>The fourth phase. Evaluation and adjustment. The materials of the “Assessment and Adjustment”
phase are intended to help in the development of a monitoring and evaluation plan; determination
of progress measurement criteria; drawing up a schedule of periodic inspections to track success and
identify problems that can be measured quantitatively: based on the analysis of documents (work plan
of post-graduate pedagogical education institutes, programs and forms of teacher training); the results
of a questionnaire regarding teachers’ satisfaction with professional development courses; introduction
of ICT by teachers in their professional activities; teacher training courses in ICT; availability of each
teacher’s individual professional development route; openness and accessibility platform for professional
development; the availability of individual and group educational and professional programs and their
variability for diferent groups of teachers (by speciality, seniority, needs); measurement of digital and
AI competence of teachers, monitoring general secondary education.</p>
        <p>
          The main problems and limitations of the developed strategy are the presence of restrictions on
ifnancial support for the development of the digital infrastructure of educational institutions in wartime
conditions, including post-graduate pedagogical education institutions; diferent level of training, digital
competence and motivation of teachers of postgraduate pedagogical education and teachers for the
digital transformation of education; lack of electricity, access to high-speed Internet in martial law
conditions [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>
          ]; lack of recommendations on the digital transformation of education at the state level
(including on the use of AI).
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Conclusions</title>
      <p>Digital technologies contribute to automating many educational institutions’ processes, allowing for
more efective management, reduced costs, and increased decision-making eficiency. Thanks to data
analysis and the use of adaptive learning systems, it is possible to create individual learning trajectories
for each teacher, considering their needs and training level. Digital platforms allow the creation of
communities of interest, which promotes social integration and the exchange of experiences between
teachers and professionals from diferent fields.</p>
      <p>The survey showed that teachers are highly motivated to use digital technologies for professional
development. The digital transformation of postgraduate education is critical for ensuring the
competitiveness and adaptability of educational institutions in today’s world. This strategy aims to create
conditions for integrating digital technologies in all aspects of postgraduate education, improve the
quality of education, and train specialists to work in the digital economy. The strategy’s primary goal is
to create an innovative and efective post-graduate education system that meets modern society’s and
the economy’s needs, ensuring access to quality education and developing digital competencies among
students and teachers. The main directions of the digital transformation of postgraduate pedagogical
education for the professional development of teachers, which were confirmed by teachers’ surveys:
• Infrastructural support for digital transformation: development of modern digital infrastructure
in educational institutions, provision of access to high-speed Internet and modern digital tools
for learning, implementation of cloud services for data storage and processing.
• Personalised and adaptive learning: the use of adaptive learning platforms to individualise the
learning process, the development of training programs that consider the individual needs and
capabilities of teachers, and the use of data analytics to monitor progress and adapt learning
trajectories.
• Professional development of teachers: organisation of training and courses for teachers on using
modern digital technologies, support of teachers in developing digital skills and implementing
innovative teaching methods, and creation of communities for sharing experiences and best
practices.
• Innovations in educational programs and teaching methods: integration of modern technologies,
such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and virtual and augmented reality, into the
educational process, development of interactive and gamified educational materials, use of
simulations and virtual laboratories for practical training.</p>
      <p>The digital transformation strategy of postgraduate education will contribute to improving its
quality, continuous professional development of teachers, developing digital competencies among the
educational process participants, and ensuring the competitiveness of educational institutions in the
modern digital world. Implementing digital technologies in all aspects of the educational process will
help create an innovative and efective learning environment that meets the requirements of the times.
Further research is required for the introduction of management plans and resource provision for the
introduction of the educational policy of digital transformation of postgraduate pedagogical education
for the professional development of teachers based on the integration of resources of institutes of
postgraduate pedagogical education, the development of educational and professional training programs
for teachers who work with teachers, the creation of single information and educational environment
for professional development teachers.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Mukul</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Büyüközkan,
          <article-title>Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of education 4.0</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Technological</surname>
            <given-names>Forecasting</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <source>and Social Change</source>
          <volume>194</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <article-title>122664</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.techfore.
          <year>2023</year>
          .
          <volume>122664</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Sony</surname>
          </string-name>
          , K. T. B.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Karingada</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Education 4.0 unravelled: deciphering critical success factors for successful implementation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education</source>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1108/ JARHE-10-2023-0459.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Ahmad</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Umirzakova</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Mujtaba,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
            <surname>Amin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>T. Whangbo, Education</source>
          <volume>5</volume>
          .0: Requirements,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Enabling</given-names>
            <surname>Technologies</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and Future Directions,
          <year>2023</year>
          . URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15846. arXiv:
          <volume>2307</volume>
          .
          <fpage>15846</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Mergel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Edelmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Haug</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Government Information Quarterly</source>
          <volume>36</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <article-title>101385</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.giq.
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <volume>06</volume>
          .002.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Ly</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The Interplay of Digital Transformational Leadership, Organizational Agility, and Digital Transformation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of the Knowledge Economy</source>
          <volume>15</volume>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          )
          <fpage>4408</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>4427</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/ s13132-023-01377-8.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Koehler</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Mishra</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Yahya</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Computers &amp; Education</source>
          <volume>49</volume>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
          <fpage>740</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>762</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.compedu.
          <year>2005</year>
          .
          <volume>11</volume>
          .012.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Kaufmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Algorithm appreciation or aversion? Comparing in-service and pre-service teachers' acceptance of computerized expert models</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence</source>
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <article-title>100028</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.caeai.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>100028</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. T. T.</given-names>
            <surname>Phuong</surname>
          </string-name>
          , T.-T. Nguyen,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N. N.</given-names>
            <surname>Danh</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. N.</given-names>
            <surname>Van</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H. D.</given-names>
            <surname>Luong</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L. V. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Nguyen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , T. Tran,
          <article-title>Digital transformation in education: a bibliometric analysis using Scopus</article-title>
          ,
          <source>European Science Editing</source>
          <volume>49</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <article-title>e107138</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3897/ese.
          <year>2023</year>
          .e107138.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O. V.</given-names>
            <surname>Ovcharuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Gurzhii</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I. V.</given-names>
            <surname>Ivaniuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Kartashova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O. O.</given-names>
            <surname>Hrytsenchuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Vakaliuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. P.</given-names>
            <surname>Shyshkina</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The use of digital tools by secondary school teachers for the implementation of distance learning in the context of digital transformation in Ukraine 3085 (</article-title>
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>16</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>27</lpage>
          . URL: https://ceur-ws.
          <source>org/</source>
          Vol-
          <volume>3085</volume>
          /paper10.pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. P.</given-names>
            <surname>Leshchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Kolomiiets</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. V.</given-names>
            <surname>Iatsyshyn</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V. V.</given-names>
            <surname>Kovalenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. V.</given-names>
            <surname>Dakal</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O. O.</given-names>
            <surname>Radchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Development of informational and research competence of postgraduate and doctoral students in conditions of digital transformation of science and education</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Physics: Conference Series</source>
          <year>1840</year>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <article-title>012057</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1088/
          <fpage>1742</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>6596</lpage>
          /
          <year>1840</year>
          /1/012057.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I. P.</given-names>
            <surname>Vorotnykova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N. V.</given-names>
            <surname>Morze</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Hrynevych</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Digital transformation of secondary education of Ukraine and the quality of teaching natural and mathematical sciences in the conditions of war</article-title>
          , in: T. A.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vakaliuk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Osadchyi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          Pinchuk (Eds.),
          <source>Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Digital Transformation of Education (DigiTransfEd</source>
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <article-title>co-located with 18th International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications (ICTERI</article-title>
          <year>2023</year>
          ), Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine,
          <source>September 18-22</source>
          ,
          <year>2023</year>
          , volume
          <volume>3553</volume>
          <source>of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org</source>
          ,
          <year>2023</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>57</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>74</lpage>
          . URL: https://ceur-ws.
          <source>org/</source>
          Vol-
          <volume>3553</volume>
          /paper13.pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          , R. Su,
          <article-title>Research on the path of digital transformation of postgraduate education in chinese universities under the background of digital education strategy</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Intelligent Information Management</source>
          <volume>15</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <fpage>339</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>349</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .4236/iim.
          <year>2023</year>
          .
          <volume>155016</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>A. M. McCarthy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Maor</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>McConney</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cavanaugh</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Open</source>
          <volume>8</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <article-title>100479</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.ssaho.
          <year>2023</year>
          .
          <volume>100479</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Tungpantong</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Nilsook</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Wannapiroon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Factors Influencing Digital Transformation Adoption among Higher Education Institutions during Digital Disruption</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Higher Education Studies</source>
          <volume>12</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <article-title>p9</article-title>
          . URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes/article/view/0/46860. doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .5539/hes. v12n2p9.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Kovalchuck</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Vorotnykova</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E-coaching, e
          <article-title>-mentoring for lifelong professional development of teachers within the system of post-graduate pedagogical education</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education</source>
          <volume>18</volume>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
          <fpage>214</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>227</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .17718/tojde.328956.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <article-title>Intel® Education Transformation Policy Tool. Transformation Toolkit for ICT Policy in Education, 2014</article-title>
          . URL: http://edutransform.org/instrumentariy-transformatsiyi
          <string-name>
            <surname>-</surname>
          </string-name>
          ikt-po/.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Muir</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Deed</surname>
          </string-name>
          , D. Thomas,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Emery</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Achieving Teacher Professional Growth Through Professional Experimentation and Changes in Pedagogical Practices</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Australian Journal of Teacher Education</source>
          <volume>46</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>22</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>38</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .14221/ajte.2021v46n9.2.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Morze</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Buinytska</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Glazunova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Kuzminska</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Protsenko,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Vorotnykova</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E-Learning Managers Training at Universities: Projection, Design and Eficiency Indicators, in: V.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ermolayev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bassiliades</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fill</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yakovyna</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mayr</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kharchenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Peschanenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shyshkina</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nikitchenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . Spivakovsky (Eds.),
          <source>Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications</source>
          . Integration, Harmonization and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Knowledge</given-names>
            <surname>Transfer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ICTERI</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2017</year>
          , Kyiv, Ukraine, May
          <volume>15</volume>
          -18,
          <year>2017</year>
          , volume
          <volume>1844</volume>
          <source>of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>229</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>244</lpage>
          . URL: https://ceur-ws.
          <source>org/</source>
          Vol-
          <volume>1844</volume>
          /10000229.pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Smith</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Gillespie</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Research on Professional Development and Teacher Change:
          <article-title>Implications for Adult Basic Education</article-title>
          , volume
          <volume>7</volume>
          , Taylor and Francis,
          <year>2007</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>205</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>244</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .4324/ 9781003417996-7.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          [20]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Holmes</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Tuomi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>State of the art and practice in AI in education</article-title>
          ,
          <source>European Journal of Education</source>
          <volume>57</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>542</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>570</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1111/ejed.12533.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          [21]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Barnard</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Dehon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Compretta</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Notebaert</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Sparkmon</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. Meyer, S. Stray,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Taylor</surname>
          </string-name>
          , D. Sullivan,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Rockhold</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Development of a competency model and tailored assessment method for high school science teachers utilizing a flipped learning approach</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Educational Technology Research and Development</source>
          <volume>68</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>2595</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2614</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/s11423-020-09782-5.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          [22]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Scientific</given-names>
            <surname>Conference</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Report of the Institute of Digitalization of Education, NAPS of Ukraine "Digital Transformation of Education in Ukraine during Martial Law"</article-title>
          :
          <source>Collection of Materials, February</source>
          <volume>24</volume>
          ,
          <year>2023</year>
          , Kyiv, Institute of Digitalization of Education,
          <source>NAPS of Ukraine</source>
          ,
          <year>2023</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          . 33407/lib.NAES.
          <volume>735053</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>