<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>F. Klessascheck);</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1613-0073</issn>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Simulating Environmental Impacts of Business Processes with SimuBridge and the SOPA Framework</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Finn Klessascheck</string-name>
          <email>finn.klessascheck@tum.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Leon Bein</string-name>
          <email>leon.bein@tum.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Luise Pufahl</string-name>
          <email>luise.pufahl@tum.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Business Process Simulation</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Sustainability, Environmental Impact Assessment, LCA</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Microsoft Windows, GNU/Linux</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>School of CIT, Technical University of Munich</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Heilbronn</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>Typescript</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Java, Scylla, Simod, openLCA, Docker</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4">
          <label>4</label>
          <institution>Weizenbaum Institute</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Berlin</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>000</volume>
      <fpage>0</fpage>
      <lpage>0001</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Assessing the environmental impact of business processes is an important factor for organizations to contribute towards meaningfully facing climate change. However, existing contributions and frameworks are often rather conceptual, and no unified and user-friendly implementation exits. For this, we draw on previous studies and extend an existing tool, SimuBridge, which allows process analysts to create, manage, and execute business process simulation scenarios. We incorporate concepts of SOPA, a framework for sustainability-oriented process analysis that uses Life Cycle Assessments as holistic indicators of environmental impact. In doing so, we enable simulation-based analyses of business processes and allow analysts to develop process re-design scenarios and compare them regarding their environmental impact.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Framework</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>https://github.com/INSM-TUM/SimuBridge--SOPA-Extension
https://github.com/INSM-TUM/SimuBridge--SOPA-Extension/#readme
https://github.com/INSM-TUM/SimuBridge--SOPA-Extension
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26885872</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Metadata description</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Tool name</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Current version</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Legal code license</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Download/Demo URL</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Documentation URL</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Source code repository</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>Screencast video</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>Value</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>SimuBridge 2.0.0 MIT</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-12">
      <title>Languages, tools and services used &lt; Supported operating environment Typescript, Java, Scylla, Simod, openLCA, Docker Microsoft Windows, GNU/Linux</title>
      <p>CEUR
ceur-ws.org</p>
      <sec id="sec-12-1">
        <title>1. Introduction</title>
        <p>
          In light of climate change and the environmental impact of human activity, it is increasingly
important for organizations to assess, quantify, and reduce the environmental impact of their
business processes [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ]. For this, various frameworks and approaches exist in a subfield of
Business Process Management (BPM), known as Green BPM, that aims at incorporating sustainability
into traditional BPM [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ]. Examples of these approaches include, i.a., [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref3">3, 1</xref>
          ]. However, often there
is no open-source implementation made available, or existing tools are cumbersome and not
user-friendly.
        </p>
        <p>
          In particular, the Sustainability-Oriented Process Analysis (SOPA) framework has been
proposed [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ]. Concretely, SOPA combines activity-based costing with business process simulation
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          ] and life-cycle assessment (LCA), for holistically assessing the environmental impact of
business process executions based on the environmental impact of activity instances and process
instances [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ]. LCA, in particular, allows analysts to assess environmental impacts of products,
processes, and services across a wide range of dimensions (e.g., toxic impacts, global warming,
land and resource use) for the entire life cycle (i.e., from material acquisition to production, use,
and disposal) into a single aggregated numeric score [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6 ref7">6, 7</xref>
          ]. For many industry sectors, existing
LCA databases provide pre-collected data for various goods and services, so that the efort of
conducting LCAs can be reduced. In this light, SOPA enables end users to manage and evaluate
re-design scenarios for their potential to reduce the environmental impact of business processes.
Currently, SOPA provides a conceptual framework and a prototypical implementation, which
requires process analysts to manually create, manage and execute simulation scenarios, as well
as to handle LCA analyses and results. Notably, a unifying UI is missing, as well as support
mechanisms for managing simulation scenarios and visualizing results.
        </p>
        <p>
          Therefore, we: 1.) integrate formal concepts of SOPA into SimuBridge [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          ] to allow easier
management and execution of simulation scenarios and visualization of their results; 2.) integrate
the LCA tool openLCA [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ] to allow process analysts to import results of LCA analyses directly
into SimuBridge; and 3.) extend the business process simulator Scylla [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ] to use SOPA concepts
and openLCA data during process simulation. This allows easier management and execution,
as well as evaluation of SOPA analyses. Figure 1 shows the main concepts and capabilities of
SimuBridge and the SOPA integration. In the following, we present the tool’s features and its
architecture, as well as its applications and potential future development.
        </p>
        <p>openLCA
Assess environmental
impact of entities and
procedures involved in
business process
activities</p>
        <p>SimuBridge
1) Import LCA data to simulate
environmental impacts of activities and</p>
        <p>business processes
2) Create and manage simulation scenarios
3) Visualize results and compare scenarios</p>
        <p>Business
process
simulator
(e.g., Scylla)</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-12-2">
        <title>2. Tool Description</title>
        <p>In the following, we describe the main features of the SimuBridge-SOPA-integration, and its
architecture. The entire tool and its source code, including a tutorial and a demonstration
screencast, is available online.</p>
        <sec id="sec-12-2-1">
          <title>2.1. Features</title>
          <p>
            The extension of SimuBridge and Scylla to include SOPA concepts enables the following
capabilities:
1) Import environmental cost driver data for SOPA analyses from openLCA. To facilitate the
analysis of business processes with process simulation, we extended SimuBridge to import
LCA data from openLCA. Concretely, process analysts with experience in LCA model product
systems in openLCA, which represent concrete entities that are involved in the execution of
activities. These product systems represent concrete environmental cost drivers of SOPA, that
is, concrete entities, products, or materials involved in the execution of activities, that cause
environmental impact for which LCA analyses can be conducted. Groups of product systems
represent abstract environmental cost drivers, being an abstract notion of what kinds of products
are involved in activity execution [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
            ].
          </p>
          <p>
            For example, a process activity where a good is packaged may use three distinct carton boxes
(distinguished, e.g., by their dimensions, quantity, or material, such as large and small cartons
made from bleached corrugated cardboard and a small carton made from unbleached recycled
ifbres) as packaging material — the packaging material would be the abstract environmental
cost driver, and the three types of carton boxes, for which LCA analyses produce environmental
impact scores, the concrete environmental cost drivers belonging to the abstract one [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
            ].
          </p>
          <p>In SimuBridge, these product systems are fetched via a TypeScript API and library ofered by
openLCA1. After fetching, a method to calculate the environmental impact of each concrete
environmental cost driver (i.e., each product system) can be selected. This method defines
the aggregation of environmental impact dimensions into a single score. Once the method is
selected, SimuBridge can trigger the calculation and stores the resulting impact scores internally.
2) Manage and run SOPA analyses. In order to conduct a SOPA-based analysis, that is, to
holistically assess the environmental impact of business processes and test various re-design
options based on process simulations, process analysts can use our tool in the following manner:</p>
          <p>
            First, a BPMN process model to be used for the analysis can be either uploaded or discovered
from an event log with the Simod tool [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
            ], which is already integrated into SimuBridge. Then,
after defining (or refining, in the case that Simod has been used to discover a process model
and an initial simulation scenario) general simulation parameters such as activity durations
and branching probabilities, the process analyst can assign abstract environmental cost drivers
to the process’ activities, extending the traditional cost perspective. In a subsequent step,
the process analyst can configure environmental cost variants, which describe how, during
simulation, abstract environmental cost drivers are translated into concrete environmental cost
drivers that cause a quantified environmental impact. For each environmental cost variant,
the process analyst also configures how many of the process executions to be simulated are
executed with which environmental cost variant. For example, 90 of 100 process instances
use one specific carton box when packaging a good, and 10 of 100 a diferent one, both with
diferent environmental impact scores. [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
            ]
          </p>
          <p>
            For reference, a formalization of these concepts, including a metamodel, formalisms describing
the exact calculations of environmental costs of activities and processes, in addition to a case
study, is provided in the original SOPA article [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
            ] — here, we rather provide a high-level
overview.
3) Visualize results of SOPA analyses. After simulation runs, which produce event logs enriched
with environmental impact indicators, the results can be visualized via a dashboard written in
1https://greendelta.github.io/openLCA-ApiDoc/ipc/ [Accessed: 16/08/2024]
TypeScript with a React chart library2. The dashboard allows process analysts to assess the
average environmental impacts of activity instances and process instances per environmental
cost variant. Based on this, they can copy the existing simulation scenario into a new scenario,
re-configure the process simulation, create new environmental cost drivers, and thereby compare
and evaluate diferent process re-designs for their potential to reduce the environmental impact
of the business process being analysed.
          </p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-12-2-2">
          <title>2.2. Structure</title>
          <p>openLCA</p>
          <p>Environmental
Cost Variants</p>
          <p>View</p>
          <p>Scenario
Management</p>
          <p>View</p>
          <p>Scenario View PaMraomdeetle-rbsasVeidew TimReetasboluecVe/iew</p>
          <p>SOPA Results</p>
          <p>View</p>
          <p>Simulator View Discovery View
Internal Storage</p>
          <p>PSaiBmXraPuMmMlaeLtNti,eorns ESviXmLenMoutglLaLst,oogr EvXenMt LLog PSaiBmXraPuMmMlaeLtNti,eorns</p>
          <p>Scylla</p>
          <p>Simod</p>
          <p>The integration of SOPA into SimuBridge extends the existing architecture and data schema
of SimuBridge, which has been implemented as a web application, in several ways. The overall
architecture is shown in Figure 2, where we highlight extended and newly added components.</p>
          <p>In general, we extended the internal purpose-built data schema to accommodate
environmental cost variants as well as abstract and concrete environmental cost drivers in simulation
scenarios. We have integrated openLCA for creating and calculating abstract and concrete
environmental cost drivers; we also extended the process simulation engine Scylla, written in
Java, to make use of these concepts and assign concrete environmental cost drivers to activity
instances based on the environmental cost variant. In Figure 3, we highlight the internal data
schema of SimuBridge and the SOPA-specific concepts that we added. We also extended the
user interface of SimuBridge to 1) configure openLCA and the environmental cost variants in
the openLCA Connector View and Environmental Cost Variants View; 2) Assign abstract
environmental cost drivers to process activities in the Model-based Parameters View; and to 3) view the
resulting environmental costs across activities and process instances in the SOPA Results View.</p>
          <p>For increased portability and independence of operating systems, we provide SimuBridge
and the process simulation engine Scylla as Docker images, i.e., packaged in light-weight virtual
containers. Only openLCA needs to be installed manually, although for Windows, a portable
standalone version also exists.3.
2https://mui.com/x/react-charts/ [Accesssed: 21/08/2024]
3See https://www.openlca.org/download/ [Accessed: 23/08/2024]
0..* Env. Cost Variant 0..*</p>
          <p>Abstract Env.</p>
          <p>Cost Drivers</p>
          <p>1 1..*</p>
          <p>Concrete Env.
0..* Cost Drivers
0..*
0..*</p>
          <p>BPS
Project
1
0..*
Scenario
1
0..*</p>
          <p>Process
Simulation Model</p>
          <p>1 1
Env. Impact 1 1
Parameter Set
1 1
1 1 Resource</p>
          <p>Parameter Set</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-12-3">
        <title>3. Demonstration and Future Work</title>
        <p>For demonstrating our implementation, we unfortunately cannot freely provide LCA datasets,
since the underlying databases are bound to (educational) licences. Instead, we provide a
synthetic dataset online4 that can be loaded into openLCA – see the repository linked above
for a description of how this can be achieved – and used for demonstration purposes. We
additionally provide several BPMN diagrams (a logistics process, a hiring process of a university,
and a pizza baking and delivery process) and describe scenarios that can be tested with our
implementation and the synthetic dataset.</p>
        <p>In the future, we plan to extend the integration of SOPA into SimuBridge: We want to
include support so that event logs with annotated environmental cost driver information
can serve as a basis for creating and configuring simulation scenarios and the corresponding
environmental cost drivers. Doing so would allow process experts to even further reason about
the environmental impact of process re-designs based on simulation scenarios derived from
historic process data (something already possible with SimuBridge without considerations
of environmental impact). We also want to make the simulation even more dynamic, so
that the simulation engine uses parametrised environmental cost drivers and calculates the
environmental impact dynamically by calling openLCA, instead of statically. Finally, we plan
to conduct a case study with the SOPA-SimuBridge extension in a real-world organization,
to further illustrate the benefit of holistic sustainability analyses of business processes with
business process simulation.</p>
        <p>Maturity We evaluated our work with several synthetic business processes and scenarios for
which we derived LCA data from existing databases. We were able to quantify the environmental
impact based on configured simulation scenarios and the underlying LCA data, and were able
to reason about reductions in environmental impact based on process redesigns. Furthermore,
4https://github.com/INSM-TUM/SimuBridge--SOPA-Extension/tree/main/demo [Accessed: 28/08/2024]
we have presented the underlying SOPA framework to several industry experts with knowledge
in the area of sustainability and BPM, who agreed that the combination of LCA-based holistic
environmental assessments and business process simulation adds value and enables useful
considerations of process redesigns.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-12-4">
        <title>Acknowledgments</title>
        <p>We would like to thank the Bachelor students who contributed to incorporate the SOPA
framework in SimuBridge and Scylla: Kareem Ali Abou-sena, Mihail Atansov, Alexey Bednik, Ilona
Bogatinovska, Wen-Chun Chen, Jing Yao Seow, Orion Shkodra, Renis Shutina, Hui-Yu Yu and
Zeynep Sude Yildirim.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Roohy Gohar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Indulska</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Environmental Sustainability through Green Business Process Management</article-title>
          , AJIS
          <volume>24</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Seidel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Recker</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. Vom</given-names>
            <surname>Brocke</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Green Business Process Management</article-title>
          , in: J. vom Brocke,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Seidel</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J. Recker (Eds.),
          <source>Green Business Process Management</source>
          , Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg,
          <year>2012</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>3</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>13</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Recker</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Rosemann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Hjalmarsson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Lind</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Modeling and Analyzing the Carbon Footprint of Business Processes</article-title>
          , in: J. vom Brocke,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Seidel</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J. Recker (Eds.),
          <source>Green Business Process Management</source>
          , Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg,
          <year>2012</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>93</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>109</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Klessascheck</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Weber</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>L. Pufahl,</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>SOPA: A Framework for Sustainability-Oriented Process Analysis and Re-design in Business Process Management</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2024</year>
          . arXiv:
          <volume>2405</volume>
          .
          <fpage>01176</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Dumas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. La</given-names>
            <surname>Rosa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Mendling</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Reijers</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Fundamentals of Business Process Management, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Finnveden</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Hauschild</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Ekvall</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Guinée</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Heijungs</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Hellweg</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Koehler</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Pennington</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Suh</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Environ</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Manage.
          <volume>91</volume>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>21</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>H. de Bruijn</surname>
            , R. van Duin,
            <given-names>M. A. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Huijbregts</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guinee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gorree</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Heijungs</surname>
            , G. Huppes,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kleijn</surname>
          </string-name>
          , A. de Koning, L. van
          <string-name>
            <surname>Oers</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. Wegener</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sleeswijk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Suh</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H. A. Udo de Haes (Eds.), Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment:
          <article-title>Operational Guide to the ISO Standards</article-title>
          , volume
          <volume>7</volume>
          of Eco-Eficiency
          <source>in Industry and Science</source>
          , Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht,
          <year>2002</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Bein</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Klessascheck</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Nepeina</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Warmuth</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Kampik</surname>
          </string-name>
          , L. Pufahl,
          <article-title>SimuBridge: Discovery and Management of Process Simulation Scenarios</article-title>
          , in: BPM (Demos/Resources Forum), Utrecht, Netherlands,
          <year>2023</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Ciroth</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>ICT for environment in life cycle applications openLCA - A new open source software for life cycle assessment</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Int J Life Cycle Assess</source>
          <volume>12</volume>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
          <fpage>209</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>210</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Pufahl</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Wong</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Weske</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Design of an Extensible BPMN Process Simulator</article-title>
          , in: E. Teniente, M. Weidlich (Eds.),
          <source>Business Process Management Workshops</source>
          , volume
          <volume>308</volume>
          , Springer International Publishing, Cham,
          <year>2018</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>782</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>795</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Camargo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Dumas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>González-Rojas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Automated discovery of business process simulation models from event logs</source>
          ,
          <source>Decision Support Systems</source>
          <volume>134</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>113284</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>