<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>A MULTI-CHANNEL OBJECTIVE MODEL FOR THE FULL REFERENCE ASSESSMENT OF COLOR PICTURES Francesca De Simone, Michael Ansorge and Touradj Ebrahimi Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper presents a new approach for the design of a full reference objective quality metric for the assessment of color pictures. Our goal is to build a multi-channel metric based on the perceptual weighting of single-channel metrics. A psycho-visual experiment is thus designed in order to determine the values of the weighting factors. This metric is expected to provide a new useful tool for the quality assessment of compressed pictures in the framework of codec performance evaluation.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. INTRODUCTION</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. PSYCHO-VISUAL TEST METHODOLOGY</title>
      <p>The compression efficiency of an image coding algorithm
expresses its ability to maximize the visual quality of the
compressed data while minimizing the number of bits used
to store the data, for a range of compression rates. Being the
human subjects the end users of the digital data, subjective
tests can be performed, where a significant sample of human
subjects is asked to rate the quality of the processed
material. Since these tests are time consuming and
expensive, usually objective metrics are used in order to
assess the quality of the compressed images. These metrics
are called Full-Reference (FR) quality metrics, because they
assume as input both the original image (i.e. reference) and
the compression version of it. A substantial effort has been
recently deployed by the research community to design
objective visual quality metrics which achieve a good
correlation with the subjective quality evaluation.
Nevertheless, most of the well-known and widely used FR
quality metrics take into account only the luminance channel
of the picture under analysis. Hence, in the state of practice,
the quality performance evaluation and optimization of full
color image algorithms are usually done by mean of
methods which are applied on the luminance component
only of the signals. Due to the evident influence of the color
information on the human perception of the quality of visual
data, this approach is of course limiting a priori the
correlation that can be met with such a single-channel
metric compared to the subjective judgment.</p>
      <p>This paper presents a general model for designing a metric
for the assessment of color pictures, by exploiting data
collected from human subjects by means of a properly
designed psycho-visual experiment. The idea is to perform
In our experiment the test material is presented to the
subjects according to a slightly modified version of the
Double Stimulus Continuous Quality Scale (DSCQS)
method [1]. Pairs of pictures are shown, with the reference
picture on one side of the screen and a distorted version on
the other side. The assessor is asked to judge the quality of
the distorted picture with respect to the reference, and to rate
it by choosing a rate on a continuous scale in the range
going from 0 (Very bad quality) to 100 (Excellent quality).
This test is performed by considering pairs where the true
color images are shown (i.e. reference image and distorted
version in the same screen); and the corresponding pairs
where just the luminance components of each true color
image previously considered are displayed (i.e. luminance
component of the reference shown together with the
luminance component of the distorted image). The
luminance-only and true color pairs are randomly mixed
while assuring that luminance-only and full color displays
are always consecutive. The test room conditions, as well as
the number of subjects, the test duration, the training session
details and the processing of the subjective data are assumed
to be standard compliant [1].</p>
      <p>By computing for each test condition the mean score over
the entire set of subjects’ rates, two sets of Mean Opinion
Score (MOS) results are obtained: one set of subjective
scores is referred to the quality evaluation of luminance only
stimulus and we will call it MOSluma; the other set is
related to the quality assessment of the full color stimulus
and we call it MOScolor. The first interesting analysis made
at this stage is related to the influence of the color
information on the overall quality assessment by the human
subject: the same distorted picture can be rated in different
ways if the subject sees the true color image or just the
luminance component of the true color image.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>2.1. Dataset selection</title>
      <p>For choosing the input data to be used in the psycho-visual
experiment, as a starting step we restrict our field of
investigation by considering a dataset of pictures including
only natural images and the distortions introduced by three
different JPEG compression algorithms specified hereafter.
Five different contents, having different spatial and color
features, have been selected for building our test set. The
selected pictures are 8 bits per channel high resolution
pictures chosen from the dataset established by Microsoft
and T. Richter [2]. The test pictures are produced by 4:4:4
coding using i) JPEG with conventional visually optimized
quantization matrix, ii) JPEG 2000 with frequency
weighting of quantization steps, and iii) the new coding
algorithm recently proposed by Microsoft and currently
under evaluation by the JPEG standardization body under
the name of JPEG XR [3]. Five levels of quality of each
compressed data have been considered. Our dataset is thus
composed of 5X3X5=75 test pictures, corresponding to 5
different original contents, 3 different coding techniques and
5 different samples in the perceivable quality difference
range of interest. Finally, since we are using very high
resolution input data, the subjective data are collected by
presenting just a selected representative crop of each picture
in order to fit the data in the native resolution of the screen
(e.g. 1920x1440 pixels screen resolution).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>3. SUBJECTIVE TO OBJECTIVE DATA FITTING</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>METHODOLOGY: A BASIC APPROACH</title>
      <p>The results of the subjective experiment described in the
previous section can be used in order to extend any generic
mono-channel metrics to the multi-channel case. In
particular, to illustrate the proposed approach, we will
consider, as an example, the application of our method to
the widely used Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) metric.
Considering the representation of an image in the Y’CbCr
color space [4], the PSNR metric can be applied on each
color channel by computing the PSNR index on the
luminance (PSNRy) and to the two chrominance
components (PSNRcb and PSNRcr). A multi-channel metric
can thus be built by simply considering the weighted
average of the PSNR indexes computed on the single
channels (i.e. multi-channel PSNR= w1PSNRy +
w2PSNRcb + w3PSNRcr). The values of the weighting
factors w1, w2 and w3 are defined by maximizing the
correlation between the multi-channel model and the
subjective results collected on the full color inputs
(MOScolor). In particular, we assume as “reference values”
the values of the Pearson correlation coefficient, the
Spearman rank order correlation coefficient, and the outliers
ratio evaluated between the MOSluma and the PSNRy.
These three measures are the standard tools used to compare
the performance of an objective metric to the subjective
scores. They provide an estimate of the accuracy,
monotonicity and consistency of the objective metric under
analysis [1]. A system of equations is thus defined,
imposing that the values of these three indexes computed
between the MOScolor and the multi-channel metric are the
known values computed for the luma only objective and
subjective data. By solving the system of equations, the
values of the weighting factors are defined.</p>
      <p>Further conditions could be that the sum of the values of the
three weighting factors is equal to 1 and that the weights of
the two chrominance channels are the same. The
investigation of more sophisticated conditions is also
currently under progress.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>4. CONCLUSIONS</title>
      <p>The final goal of the proposed approach is to design a
general method for the extension of a generic mono-channel
metric to a multi-channel case, in order to achieve a better
correlation with the end user quality judgment compared to
the objective metric applied on the luminance channel only.
One of the main advantage of our approach is that it allows
the usage of well-know single-channel metrics (i.e. PSNR,
SSIM) in the multi-channel scenario, thus providing a new
tool to researchers who are already applying these metrics
for the luminance-only objective quality assessment, by
simply suggesting the right weights to be used for the
weighting of the three channels.</p>
      <p>The psycho-visual experiment described in this paper is
currently running, so that the analysis of the results and the
proposition of more sophisticated fitting methodologies will
be reported in future publications.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>5. REFERENCES</title>
      <p>[1] Recommendation ITU‐R BT.500‐11, Methodology for the
subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures, Geneva,
June 2002.
[2] Test dataset available on the JPEG committee sftp server,
http://www.jpeg.org.
[3] S. Srinivasan, C. Tu, S.L. Regunathan, R.A. Rossi, G.J.
Sullivan, HD Photo: a new image coding technology for digital
photography, Proceedings of SPIE, Applications of Digital Image
Processing XXX, vol. 6696, San Diego, CA USA, August 2007.
[4] Recommendation ITU‐R BT.601-6, Studio encoding
parameters of digital television for standard 4:3 and wide screen
16:9 aspect ratio, Geneva, January 2007.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>